1
|
Pozzar RA, Seven M. Interventions to support decision making in people considering germline genetic testing for BRCA 1/2 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants: A scoping review. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:392-401. [PMID: 37328917 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are medically actionable and may inform hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) treatment and prevention. However, rates of germline genetic testing (GT) in people with and without cancer are suboptimal. Individuals' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs may influence GT decisions. While genetic counseling (GC) provides decision support, the supply of genetic counselors is insufficient to meet demand. Accordingly, there is a need to explore the evidence on interventions that aim to support BRCA1/2 testing decisions. We conducted a scoping review of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO using search terms related to HBOC, GT, and decision making. First, we screened records to identify peer-reviewed reports that described interventions to support BRCA1/2 testing decisions. Next, we reviewed full-text reports and excluded studies that lacked statistical comparisons or enrolled previously tested individuals. Finally, we extracted study characteristics and findings into a table. All records and reports were reviewed independently by two authors; decisions were tracked in Rayyan, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Of 2116 unique citations, 25 met the eligibility criteria. Articles were published between 1997 and 2021 and described randomized trials and nonrandomized, quasi-experimental studies. Most studies tested technology-based (12/25, 48%) or written (9/25, 36%) interventions. Nearly half (12/25, 48%) of interventions were designed to complement traditional GC. Of the interventions compared to GC, 75% (6/8) increased or had a noninferior effect on knowledge, and 67% (4/6) decreased or had a noninferior effect on decisional conflict. Intervention effects on GT uptake were mixed, which may reflect evolving eligibility criteria for GT. Our findings suggest novel interventions may promote informed GT decision making, but many were developed to complement traditional GC. Trials that assess the effects of decision support interventions in diverse samples and evaluate implementation strategies for efficacious interventions are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Pozzar
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Memnun Seven
- Elaine Marieb College of Nursing, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Culver JO, Bertsch NL, Kurz RN, Cheng LL, Pritzlaff M, Rao SK, Stasi SM, Stave CD, Sharaf RN. Systematic evidence review and meta-analysis of outcomes associated with cancer genetic counseling. Genet Med 2024; 26:100980. [PMID: 37688462 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetic counseling (GC) is standard of care in genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA). A rigorous assessment of the data reported from published studies is crucial to ensure the evidence-based implementation of GC. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 patient-reported and health-services-related outcomes associated with pre- and post-test GC in GCRA in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. RESULTS Twenty-five of 5393 screened articles met inclusion criteria. No articles reporting post-test GC outcomes met inclusion criteria. For patient-reported outcomes, pre-test GC significantly decreased worry, increased knowledge, and decreased perceived risk but did not significantly affect patient anxiety, depression, decisional conflict, satisfaction, or intent to pursue genetic testing. For health-services outcomes, pre-test GC increased correct genetic test ordering, reduced inappropriate services, increased spousal support for genetic testing, and expedited care delivery but did not consistently improve cancer prevention behaviors nor lead to accurate risk assessment. The GRADE certainty in the evidence was very low or low. No included studies elucidated GC effect on mortality, cascade testing, cost-effectiveness, care coordination, shared decision making, or patient time burden. CONCLUSION The true impact of GC on relevant outcomes is not known low quality or absent evidence. Although a meta-analysis found that pre-test GC had beneficial effects on knowledge, worry, and risk perception, the certainty of this evidence was low according to GRADE methodology. Further studies are needed to support the evidence-based application of GC in GCRA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie O Culver
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
| | | | - Raluca N Kurz
- Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Linda L Cheng
- Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Ravi N Sharaf
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine and Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chu ATW, Chung CCY, Hue SPY, Chung BHY. The growing needs of genetic counselling-Feasibility in utilization of tele-genetic counselling in Asia and Hong Kong. Front Genet 2023; 14:1239817. [PMID: 37600657 PMCID: PMC10435751 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1239817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The need for the expansion of genomic services has been at a record time high in the past decade. As technological advancement continues to strengthen the entire genetic and genomic pipeline and clinical operational workflow, the major challenge remains to be the speed of workforce development to meet service growth. In particular, the international expansion of genetic counselling (GC) services has been a topic of interest for the past few years. GC is an emerging profession in most of Asia, and in many countries the profession of GC often refers to physicians or front-line health workers with expertise in genetics to provide GC services rather than being a specific independent profession. As genetic and genomic services, especially pre-test and post-test GC, expand globally, the need to tackle the longstanding obstacles of GC personnel shortage and funding issues must not be overlooked. There is an urgent need internationally, and especially in Asia, where GC profession is comparatively less well-established, to seek alternative approaches to meet service demand. The present review examines the global development and feasibility of tele-genetics and tele-genetic counselling (TGC), and serves as the foundation to explore a possible roadmap in Hong Kong via the Hong Kong Genome Project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Brian Hon Yin Chung
- Hong Kong Genome Institute, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuo WL, Lin PH, Peng MT, Chu CH, Cho CW. Patients' attitudes regarding genetic counseling before germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants testing in Taiwan: A single-country, multi-center, patient-reported outcome study. J Genet Couns 2023. [PMID: 36872635 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants of BRCA1 or BRCA2 cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes. The present study investigated the participants' understanding and awareness of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants before genetic counseling, the expectations and obstacles for genetic testing from the perspective of participants and their families, and their attitudes towards genetic testing after counseling. In this single-country, multicenter, non-interventional, patient-reported outcome study, untested cancer patients and their families who visited genetic counseling clinics or who wanted to receive pre-test genetic counseling were eligible to fill in the questionnaire after pre-test counseling for germline BRCA1/2 testing. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and information collected from the questionnaires, including the understanding of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants before genetic counseling, understanding of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and feelings after genetic counseling, willingness to share results of genetic testing with family, and willingness to receive genetic testing, were summarized using descriptive statistics. A total of 88 participants were enrolled. The proportion of slight understanding of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants increased from 11.4% to 67.0%, and the proportion of full understanding increased from 0% to 8.0%. After genetic counseling, most participants were willing to undergo genetic testing (87.5%) and share the results with their families (96.6%). The main factors that may affect participants' willingness to undergo BRCA1/2 testing were management (61.2%) and testing costs (25.9%). After pre-test counseling, there was a high acceptance of BRCA1/2 testing and in-family information sharing in Taiwanese patients with cancer and their families, which may serve as a reference for implementing genetic counseling in Taiwan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Ling Kuo
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Po-Han Lin
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Ting Peng
- Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Division of Haematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hui Chu
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
French DP, Woof VG, Ruane H, Evans DG, Ulph F, Donnelly LS. The feasibility of implementing risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme: a focus group study investigating the perspectives of healthcare personnel responsible for delivery. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:142. [PMID: 35501791 PMCID: PMC9063090 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01730-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Providing women with personalized estimates of their risk of developing breast cancer, as part of routine breast cancer screening programmes, allows women at higher risk to be offered more frequent screening or drugs to reduce risk. For this to be feasible, the concept and practicalities have to be acceptable to the healthcare professionals who would put it in to practice. The present research investigated the acceptability to healthcare professionals who were responsible for the implementation of this new approach to screening in the ongoing BC-Predict study. METHODS Four focus groups were conducted with 29 healthcare professionals from a variety of professional backgrounds working within three breast screening services in north-west England. An inductive-manifest thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Overall, healthcare professionals viewed the implementation of personalised breast cancer risk estimation as a positive step, but discussion focused on concerns. Three major themes are presented. (1) Service constraints highlights the limited capacity within current breast services and concerns about the impact of additional workload. (2) Risk communication concerns the optimal way to convey risk to women within resource constraints. (3) Accentuating inequity discusses how risk stratification could decrease screening uptake for underserved groups. CONCLUSIONS Staff who implemented risk stratification considered it a positive addition to routine screening. They considered it essential to consider improving capacity and demands on healthcare professional time. They highlighted the need for skilled communication of risks and new pathways of care to ensure that stratification could be implemented in financially and time constrained settings without impacting negatively on women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P French
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Victoria G Woof
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Ruane
- Nightingale & Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Nightingale & Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, Department of Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Ulph
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise S Donnelly
- Nightingale & Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jull J, Köpke S, Smith M, Carley M, Finderup J, Rahn AC, Boland L, Dunn S, Dwyer AA, Kasper J, Kienlin SM, Légaré F, Lewis KB, Lyddiatt A, Rutherford C, Zhao J, Rader T, Graham ID, Stacey D. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 11:CD013385. [PMID: 34749427 PMCID: PMC8575556 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013385.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision coaching is non-directive support delivered by a healthcare provider to help patients prepare to actively participate in making a health decision. 'Healthcare providers' are considered to be all people who are engaged in actions whose primary intent is to protect and improve health (e.g. nurses, doctors, pharmacists, social workers, health support workers such as peer health workers). Little is known about the effectiveness of decision coaching. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of decision coaching (I) for people facing healthcare decisions for themselves or a family member (P) compared to (C) usual care or evidence-based intervention only, on outcomes (O) related to preparation for decision making, decisional needs and potential adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library (Wiley), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), Nursing and Allied Health Source (ProQuest), and Web of Science from database inception to June 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where the intervention was provided to adults or children preparing to make a treatment or screening healthcare decision for themselves or a family member. Decision coaching was defined as: a) delivered individually by a healthcare provider who is trained or using a protocol; and b) providing non-directive support and preparing an adult or child to participate in a healthcare decision. Comparisons included usual care or an alternate intervention. There were no language restrictions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data on characteristics of the intervention(s) and outcomes. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion to reach consensus. We used the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the measures of treatment effect and, where possible, synthesised results using a random-effects model. If more than one study measured the same outcome using different tools, we used a random-effects model to calculate the standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI. We presented outcomes in summary of findings tables and applied GRADE methods to rate the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS Out of 12,984 citations screened, we included 28 studies of decision coaching interventions alone or in combination with evidence-based information, involving 5509 adult participants (aged 18 to 85 years; 64% female, 52% white, 33% African-American/Black; 68% post-secondary education). The studies evaluated decision coaching used for a range of healthcare decisions (e.g. treatment decisions for cancer, menopause, mental illness, advancing kidney disease; screening decisions for cancer, genetic testing). Four of the 28 studies included three comparator arms. For decision coaching compared with usual care (n = 4 studies), we are uncertain if decision coaching compared with usual care improves any outcomes (i.e. preparation for decision making, decision self-confidence, knowledge, decision regret, anxiety) as the certainty of the evidence was very low. For decision coaching compared with evidence-based information only (n = 4 studies), there is low certainty-evidence that participants exposed to decision coaching may have little or no change in knowledge (SMD -0.23, 95% CI: -0.50 to 0.04; 3 studies, 406 participants). There is low certainty-evidence that participants exposed to decision coaching may have little or no change in anxiety, compared with evidence-based information. We are uncertain if decision coaching compared with evidence-based information improves other outcomes (i.e. decision self-confidence, feeling uninformed) as the certainty of the evidence was very low. For decision coaching plus evidence-based information compared with usual care (n = 17 studies), there is low certainty-evidence that participants may have improved knowledge (SMD 9.3, 95% CI: 6.6 to 12.1; 5 studies, 1073 participants). We are uncertain if decision coaching plus evidence-based information compared with usual care improves other outcomes (i.e. preparation for decision making, decision self-confidence, feeling uninformed, unclear values, feeling unsupported, decision regret, anxiety) as the certainty of the evidence was very low. For decision coaching plus evidence-based information compared with evidence-based information only (n = 7 studies), we are uncertain if decision coaching plus evidence-based information compared with evidence-based information only improves any outcomes (i.e. feeling uninformed, unclear values, feeling unsupported, knowledge, anxiety) as the certainty of the evidence was very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Decision coaching may improve participants' knowledge when used with evidence-based information. Our findings do not indicate any significant adverse effects (e.g. decision regret, anxiety) with the use of decision coaching. It is not possible to establish strong conclusions for other outcomes. It is unclear if decision coaching always needs to be paired with evidence-informed information. Further research is needed to establish the effectiveness of decision coaching for a broader range of outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Jull
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Sascha Köpke
- Institute of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Meg Carley
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University & the Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne C Rahn
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Unit, University of Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | - Laura Boland
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Western University, London, Canada
| | - Sandra Dunn
- BORN Ontario, CHEO Research Institute, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Andrew A Dwyer
- William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston University, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA
- Munn Center for Nursing Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jürgen Kasper
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Simone Maria Kienlin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
- The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Department of Medicine and Healthcare, Hamar, Norway
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada
| | - Krystina B Lewis
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Claudia Rutherford
- School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Junqiang Zhao
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Tamara Rader
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), Ottawa, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Danylchuk NR, Cook L, Shane-Carson KP, Cacioppo CN, Hardy MW, Nusbaum R, Steelman SC, Malinowski J. Telehealth for genetic counseling: A systematic evidence review. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:1361-1378. [PMID: 34355839 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Telehealth options, such as telephone counseling or videoconferencing, for service delivery in genetic counseling are becoming more widely accepted. However, until now, there has not been a systematic review of the literature focused specifically on genetic counseling outcomes for telehealth. We performed a systematic evidence review to compare telehealth genetic counseling (THGC), including videoconferencing and telephone counseling, across specialties to in-person genetic counseling (IPGC) for a range of outcomes specific to patient and provider experiences and access to care. Several biomedical databases were queried up to January 11, 2021, to identify original research evaluating THGC. Through this search, 42 articles met the inclusion criteria including 13 randomized controlled trials and 29 non-randomized observational studies encompassing 13,901 patients. Most included studies focused only on cancer genetic counseling; however, adult, pediatric, and prenatal specialties were also represented. The majority of studies evaluated patient and/or access to care outcomes. Though most studies reported high patient satisfaction with THGC, as well as comparable rates of trust and rapport, confidence in privacy, health behavior changes, and psychosocial outcomes, few represented diverse populations. Data of provider experiences were limited and varied with more disadvantages noted compared with patient experiences, particularly in studies involving telephone genetic counseling. Studies consistently reported a decrease in the patients' costs and time required for travel when patients are seen via THGC compared to IPGC with a similar reduction in costs to the health system. Overall, results from our evidence synthesis suggest THGC is non-inferior or comparable to IPGC across many domains, even considering that many of the studies included in this review were conducted with telehealth systems, notably videoconferencing, that were less robust and reliable than what is available today. There are notable limitations within this body of literature, leading to potential uncertainty in the generalizability of our analysis. We outline several recommendations for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelle R Danylchuk
- Department of Genetic Counseling, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Lola Cook
- Department of Medical & Molecular Genetics, Indiana U School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Kate P Shane-Carson
- Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Cara N Cacioppo
- Penn Telegenetics Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Rachel Nusbaum
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Susan C Steelman
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Library, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Turchetti D, Battistuzzi L, Bertonazzi B, Godino L. Sudden shift to remote genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of genetics professionals in Italy. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:1024-1037. [PMID: 34096134 PMCID: PMC8242797 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The 2020 COVID‐19 pandemic has rendered in‐person provision of genetic counseling impossible for prolonged periods in many countries, mandating a sudden shift to remote delivery. We used qualitative thematic analysis to explore Italian genetics professionals’ experience with remote genetic counseling. Fourteen group and four individual interviews were conducted after participants had delivered one or more remote sessions via videoconference or on the telephone. Data were coded and grouped under themes. Three main themes were identified as follows: (a) technical and logistical issues, (b) communication issues, and (c) clinical content and outcome of the session. The participants acknowledged that not having to travel to the clinic saves consultands time and expense. They also highlighted that not sharing a physical space with consultands and having to rely on technology can negatively impact on effective communication, building trusting relationships, and performing accurate psychosocial assessments. Regarding the clinical content of sessions, remote genetic counseling was perceived to favor greater focus and succinct, to the point communication. However, participants also felt uncomfortable not being able to use visual aids to support the explanation of complex concepts. Moreover, demographics and the socio‐cultural status of consultands emerged as factors influencing the outcome of remote genetic counseling sessions. Finally, participants reported feeling that more experience with this novel approach would improve their confidence and their ability to adapt their counseling skills as appropriate. Based on these findings, we suggest that effective, equitable provision of remote genetic counseling will require an infrastructure that is able to support video counseling, sharing of clinical documents and visual aids, and connect with a wide range of devices. Moreover, the structure of sessions should be tailored to the specific requirements of remote genetic counseling and suitable training efforts should be promoted to enhance professionals’ communication skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Turchetti
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Centro di Ricerca sui Tumori Ereditari, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,UO Genetica Medica, IRCCS AOU Policlinico di S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Linda Battistuzzi
- Dipartimento di Informatica, Bioingegneria, Robotica e Ingegneria dei Sistemi, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Benedetta Bertonazzi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Centro di Ricerca sui Tumori Ereditari, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lea Godino
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Centro di Ricerca sui Tumori Ereditari, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,UO Genetica Medica, IRCCS AOU Policlinico di S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Waters EA, Taber JM, McQueen A, Housten AJ, Studts JL, Scherer LD. Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:2389-2394. [PMID: 33046450 PMCID: PMC8170537 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer risk prediction models such as those published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention are a cornerstone of precision medicine and public health efforts to improve population health outcomes by tailoring preventive strategies and therapeutic treatments to the people who are most likely to benefit. However, there are several barriers to the effective translation, dissemination, and implementation of cancer risk prediction models into clinical and public health practice. In this commentary, we discuss two broad categories of barriers. Specifically, we assert that the successful use of risk-stratified cancer prevention and treatment strategies is particularly unlikely if risk prediction models are translated into risk assessment tools that (i) are difficult for the public to understand or (ii) are not structured in a way to engender the public's confidence that the results are accurate. We explain what aspects of a risk assessment tool's design and content may impede understanding and acceptance by the public. We also describe strategies for translating a cancer risk prediction model into a cancer risk assessment tool that is accessible, meaningful, and useful for the public and in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika A Waters
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| | | | - Amy McQueen
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Jamie L Studts
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thapa S, Leppin A, Kristensen R, Just Bonde M, Aro AR. Implementation of interventions targeting the uptake of genetic testing services for breast cancer risk: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e031727. [PMID: 32595144 PMCID: PMC7322324 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The timely identification of breast cancer-related pathogenic variants can help to identify the risk of potential disease development and determine healthcare choices. However, the uptake rate of genetic testing services for breast cancer risk remains low in many countries. Interventions targeting the uptake of these services among individuals potentially at risk for inherited breast cancer are often complex and have multiple components, and are therefore difficult to implement, replicate and disseminate to new contexts. Our aim is to systematically review studies targeting the uptake of genetic testing services for breast cancer risk and critically assess the quality of implementation outcomes and the reporting of intervention descriptions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Library and all Campbell Coordinating Group databases will be searched for intervention studies that target individuals' participation in breast cancer genetic testing programmes. Papers published in English within the time period from January 2005 until October 2019 will be considered for inclusion. Titles, abstracts and full papers will be screened for eligibility by two pairs of reviewers independently. For data analysis and synthesis, study-level and intervention-level characteristics will be abstracted. We will present all implementation outcomes that are mentioned in each of the studies and register the number of studies that do not at all look at or report implementation outcomes. The quality of implementation will be checked using a 5-point rubric item, and the quality and completeness of reporting of intervention description will be evaluated using the 12-item Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required to conduct this review. Review findings will be disseminated to academic and non-specialist audiences via peer-reviewed academic journals and presented at appropriate conferences, workshops and meetings to policymakers, practitioners and organisations that work with our population of interest. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018105732.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subash Thapa
- Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Anja Leppin
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Rikke Kristensen
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Mette Just Bonde
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Arja R Aro
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hallet J, Davis LE, Isenberg-Grzeda E, Mahar AL, Zhao H, Zuk V, Moody L, Coburn NG. Gaps in the Management of Depression Symptoms Following Cancer Diagnosis: A Population-Based Analysis of Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes. Oncologist 2020; 25:e1098-e1108. [PMID: 32100906 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the most common psychological morbidities of cancer is depression. Routine depression symptoms screening (DSS) is recommended, but its ability to lead to psychosocial interventions in clinical practice is limited. We examined the use of and factors associated with psychosocial interventions for positive DSS following cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients with diagnoses from 2010 to 2017 who reported ≥1 patient-reported Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) score. Positive DSS was defined as ESAS ≥2 out of 10 for the depression item within 6 months of diagnosis. Outcomes were psychosocial interventions around the time of positive DSS: palliative care assessment, psychiatry/psychology assessment, social work referral, and antidepressant therapy (in patients ≥65 years of age with universal drug coverage). We examined reduction in depression symptom score (≥1 point) following intervention. Modified Poisson regression examined factors associated with interventions. RESULTS Of 142,270 patients, 65,424 (46.0%) reported positive DSS at a median of 66 days (interquartile range: 34-105) after diagnosis. Of those with depression symptoms, 17.1% received palliative assessment, 1.7% psychiatry/psychology assessment, 8.4% social work referral, and 4.3% antidepressant therapy. Depression symptom score decreased in 67.2% who received palliative assessment, 63.7% with psychiatry/psychology assessment, 67.3% with social work referral, and 71.4% with antidepressant therapy. On multivariable analysis, patients with older age, rural residence, lowest income quintile, and genitourinary or oropharyngeal cancer were more likely to not receive intervention other than palliative care. CONCLUSION The proportion of patients reporting positive DSS after cancer diagnosis receiving psychosocial intervention is low. We identified patients vulnerable to not receiving interventions, who may benefit from additional support. These data represent a call to action to modify practice and optimize the usefulness of systematic symptom screening. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Patient-reported depression symptoms screening should be followed by targeted interventions to improve symptoms and patient-centered management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Hallet
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura E Davis
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elie Isenberg-Grzeda
- Division of Psycho-Social Services, Odette Cancer Centre - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alyson L Mahar
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Victoria Zuk
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Natalie G Coburn
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bayne M, Fairey M, Silarova B, Griffin SJ, Sharp SJ, Klein WMP, Sutton S, Usher-Smith JA. Effect of interventions including provision of personalised cancer risk information on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:83-95. [PMID: 31439435 PMCID: PMC6919334 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize the literature on the effect of provision of personalised cancer risk information to individuals at population level risk on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses. METHODS A systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of articles published from 01/01/2000 to 01/07/2017. RESULTS We included 23 studies. Immediately after provision of risk information 87% of individuals were able to recall the absolute risk estimate. Less than half believed that to be their risk, with up to 71% believing their risk to be higher than the estimate. Provision of risk information increased accuracy of perceived absolute risk immediately after risk information compared with no information (pooled RR 4.16 (95%CI 1.28-13.49), 3 studies). There was no significant effect on comparative risk accuracy (pooled RR 1.39 (0.72-2.69), 2 studies) and either no change or a reduction in cancer worry, anxiety and fear. CONCLUSION These findings highlight the complex cognitive processes involved in the conceptualisation of risk. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Individuals who appear to understand and are able to recall risk information most likely do not believe it reflects their own risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Bayne
- University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Madi Fairey
- University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Simon J Griffin
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen J Sharp
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge UK
| | - William M P Klein
- Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Stephen Sutton
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Juliet A Usher-Smith
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Doubeni CA, Epling JW, Kubik M, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Pbert L, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2019; 322:652-665. [PMID: 31429903 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.10987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 261] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Potentially harmful mutations of the breast cancer susceptibility 1 and 2 genes (BRCA1/2) are associated with increased risk for breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. For women in the United States, breast cancer is the most common cancer after nonmelanoma skin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death. In the general population, BRCA1/2 mutations occur in an estimated 1 in 300 to 500 women and account for 5% to 10% of breast cancer cases and 15% of ovarian cancer cases. OBJECTIVE To update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for potentially harmful BRCA1/2 mutations in asymptomatic women who have never been diagnosed with BRCA-related cancer, as well as those with a previous diagnosis of breast, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer who have completed treatment and are considered cancer free. In addition, the USPSTF reviewed interventions to reduce the risk for breast, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer in women with potentially harmful BRCA1/2 mutations, including intensive cancer screening, medications, and risk-reducing surgery. FINDINGS For women whose family or personal history is associated with an increased risk for harmful mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes, or who have an ancestry associated with BRCA1/2 gene mutations, there is adequate evidence that the benefits of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and interventions are moderate. For women whose personal or family history or ancestry is not associated with an increased risk for harmful mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes, there is adequate evidence that the benefits of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and interventions are small to none. Regardless of family or personal history, the USPSTF found adequate evidence that the overall harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and interventions are small to moderate. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF recommends that primary care clinicians assess women with a personal or family history of breast, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer or who have an ancestry associated with BRCA1/2 gene mutations with an appropriate brief familial risk assessment tool. Women with a positive result on the risk assessment tool should receive genetic counseling and, if indicated after counseling, genetic testing. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against routine risk assessment, genetic counseling, or genetic testing for women whose personal or family history or ancestry is not associated with potentially harmful BRCA1/2 gene mutations. (D recommendation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Douglas K Owens
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
- Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Karina W Davidson
- Feinstein Institute for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
| | - Alex H Krist
- Fairfax Family Practice Residency, Fairfax, Virginia
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lori Pbert
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester
| | | | | | - Chien-Wen Tseng
- University of Hawaii, Honolulu
- Pacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - John B Wong
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Haney E, Holmes R. Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2019; 322:666-685. [PMID: 31429902 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.8430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Pathogenic mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 increase risks for breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer in women; interventions reduce risk in mutation carriers. OBJECTIVE To update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force review on benefits and harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA1/2-related cancer in women. DATA SOURCES Cochrane libraries; MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE (January 1, 2013, to March 6, 2019, for updates; January 1, 1994, to March 6, 2019, for new key questions and populations); reference lists. STUDY SELECTION Discriminatory accuracy studies, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and observational studies of women without recently diagnosed BRCA1/2-related cancer. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data on study methods, setting, population characteristics, eligibility criteria, interventions, numbers enrolled and lost to follow-up, outcome ascertainment, and results were abstracted. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cancer incidence and mortality; discriminatory accuracy of risk assessment tools for BRCA1/2 mutations; benefits and harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and risk-reducing interventions. RESULTS For this review, 103 studies (110 articles; N = 92 712) were included. No studies evaluated the effectiveness of risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing in reducing incidence and mortality of BRCA1/2-related cancer. Fourteen studies (n = 43 813) of 8 risk assessment tools to guide referrals to genetic counseling demonstrated moderate to high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.68-0.96). Twenty-eight studies (n = 8060) indicated that genetic counseling was associated with reduced breast cancer worry, anxiety, and depression; increased understanding of risk; and decreased intention for testing. Twenty studies (n = 4322) showed that breast cancer worry and anxiety were higher after testing for women with positive results and lower for others; understanding of risk was higher after testing. In 8 RCTs (n = 54 651), tamoxifen (relative risk [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59-0.84]; 4 trials), raloxifene (RR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.24-0.80]; 2 trials), and aromatase inhibitors (RR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.26-0.70]; 2 trials) were associated with lower risks of invasive breast cancer compared with placebo; results were not specific to mutation carriers. Mastectomy was associated with 90% to 100% reduction in breast cancer incidence (6 studies; n = 2546) and 81% to 100% reduction in breast cancer mortality (1 study; n = 639); oophorectomy was associated with 69% to 100% reduction in ovarian cancer (2 studies; n = 2108); complications were common with mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among women without recently diagnosed BRCA1/2-related cancer, the benefits and harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing to reduce cancer incidence and mortality have not been directly evaluated by current research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi D Nelson
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Miranda Pappas
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Amy Cantor
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Elizabeth Haney
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Rebecca Holmes
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cognitive Biases of Consumers' Risk Perception of Foodborne Diseases in China: Examining Anchoring Effect. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16132268. [PMID: 31252539 PMCID: PMC6651537 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16132268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Consumer cognitive biases arise from judgment and decision-making due to their limitations in information processing. As one of the important cognitive biases, the anchoring effect plays a significant role in interfering with consumers’ risk perception. With a stratified random approach, we collected survey data from 375 consumers in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China. Based on these data, this study attempted to analyze the anchoring effect in consumers’ risk perception of foodborne diseases (FBDs) and the differences in their perception before and after intervention in a contrast experiment using the anchoring index and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The results confirm the existence of the proposed anchoring effect. Moreover, the experimenter-provided anchor value, a history of FBD, and familiarity with FBD were found to be important factors influencing this anchoring effect. Therefore, improving consumers’ risk perception of FBD is critical to the long-term prevention of FBD risks by the government and consumers. The government should strengthen active monitoring, publicity, and education about FBD.
Collapse
|
16
|
Marshall AA, Zaccardelli A, Yu Z, Prado MG, Liu X, Miller Kroouze R, Kalia SS, Green RC, Triedman NA, Lu B, Deane KD, Iversen MD, Karlson EW, Sparks JA. Effect of communicating personalized rheumatoid arthritis risk on concern for developing RA: A randomized controlled trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:976-983. [PMID: 30558852 PMCID: PMC6491232 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Revised: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of providing comprehensive personalized risk information on concern for chronic disease development. METHODS Unaffected first-degree relatives (FDRs) of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (n = 238) were randomly allocated to: 1) disclosure of RA risk personalized to demographics, genetics, biomarkers, and behaviors using a web-based tool (PRE-RA arm, n = 78); 2) PRE-RA with interpretation by a health educator (PRE-RA Plus arm, n = 80); and 3) standard RA education (Comparison arm, n = 80). Concern for developing RA was assessed at baseline and immediately, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months post-intervention. RESULTS FDRs randomized to PRE-RA arms were less concerned about developing RA than the Comparison arm at all post-intervention assessments (p < 0.05). Among those concerned about RA risk at baseline, the PRE-RA (OR = 4.7, 95%CI 1.5-14.4) and PRE-RA Plus (OR = 5.2, 95%CI 1.6-17.3) arms were more likely to have reassurance 6 months post-intervention than the Comparison arm. CONCLUSION A comprehensive tool provided reassurance to those at risk for developing a chronic disease, with or without interpretation from a health educator, compared to standard education. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Individuals may be more likely to be reassured using a personalized chronic disease risk disclosure tool than a standard non-personalized approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison A Marshall
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA; Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Avenue, 02111, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Alessandra Zaccardelli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Zhi Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Maria G Prado
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Xinyi Liu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Rachel Miller Kroouze
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Sarah S Kalia
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Robert C Green
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, 02115, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, NRB Rm. 250, 02115, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute, 415 Main Street, 02142, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | - Nellie A Triedman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Bing Lu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Kevin D Deane
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1635 Aurora Court, 80045, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Maura D Iversen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, 02115, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, 301 Robinson Hall, 360 Huntington Avenue, 02115, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, SE-177 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Elizabeth W Karlson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jeffrey A Sparks
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, 02115, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Goldstein KM, Zullig LL, Dedert EA, Alishahi Tabriz A, Brearly TW, Raitz G, Sata SS, Whited JD, Bosworth HB, Gordon AM, Nagi A, Williams JW, Gierisch JM. Telehealth Interventions Designed for Women: an Evidence Map. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33:2191-2200. [PMID: 30284173 PMCID: PMC6258612 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4655-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telehealth employs technology to connect patients to the right healthcare resources at the right time. Women are high utilizers of healthcare with gender-specific health issues that may benefit from the convenience and personalization of telehealth. Thus, we produced an evidence map describing the quantity, distribution, and characteristics of evidence assessing the effectiveness of telehealth services designed for women. METHODS We searched MEDLINE® (via PubMed®) and Embase® from inception through March 20, 2018. We screened systematic reviews (SRs), randomized trials, and quasi-experimental studies using predetermined eligibility criteria. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified for data abstraction. To assess emerging trends, we also conducted a targeted search of ClinicalTrials.gov . RESULTS Two hundred thirty-four primary studies and three SRs were eligible for abstraction. We grouped studies into focused areas of research: maternal health (n = 96), prevention (n = 46), disease management (n = 63), family planning (n = 9), high-risk breast cancer assessment (n = 10), intimate partner violence (n = 7), and mental health (n = 3). Most interventions focused on phone as the primary telehealth modality and featured healthcare team-to-patient communication and were limited in duration (e.g., < 12 weeks). Few interventions were conducted with older women (≥ 60 years) or in racially/ethnically diverse populations. There are few SRs in this area and limited evidence regarding newer telehealth modalities such as mobile-based applications or short message service/texting. Targeted search of clinical.trials.gov yielded 73 ongoing studies that show a shift in the use of non-telephone modalities. DISCUSSION Our systematic evidence map highlights gaps in the existing literature, such as a lack of studies in key women's health areas (intimate partner violence, mental health), and a dearth of relevant SRs. With few existing SRs in this literature, there is an opportunity for examining effects, efficiency, and acceptability across studies to inform efforts at implementing telehealth for women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Goldstein
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eric A Dedert
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,VA Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amir Alishahi Tabriz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Timothy W Brearly
- Salisbury Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Salisbury, NC, USA.,Neuropsychology Assessment Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Giselle Raitz
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - John D Whited
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Adelaide M Gordon
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Avishek Nagi
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John W Williams
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer M Gierisch
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Usher-Smith JA, Masson G, Mills K, Sharp SJ, Sutton S, Klein WMP, Griffin SJ. A randomised controlled trial of the effect of providing online risk information and lifestyle advice for the most common preventable cancers: study protocol. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:796. [PMID: 29940914 PMCID: PMC6019532 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5712-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Prevention is recognised by many, including the World Health Organization, to offer the most cost-effective long-term strategy for the control of cancer. One approach that focuses on individuals is the provision of personalised risk information. However, whether such information motivates behaviour change and whether the effect is different with varying formats of risk presentation is unclear. We aim to assess the short-term effect of providing information about personalised risk of cancer in three different formats alongside lifestyle advice on health-related behaviours, risk perception and risk conviction. METHODS In a parallel group, randomised controlled trial 1000 participants will be recruited through the online platform Prolific. Participants will be allocated to either a control group receiving cancer-specific lifestyle advice alone or one of three intervention groups receiving the same lifestyle advice alongside their estimated 10-year risk of developing one of the five most common preventable cancers, calculated from self-reported modifiable behavioural risk factors, in one of three different formats (bar chart, pictograph or qualitative scale). The primary outcome is change from baseline in computed risk relative to an individual with a recommended lifestyle at three months. Secondary outcomes include: perceived risk of cancer; anxiety; cancer-related worry; intention to change behaviour; and awareness of cancer risk factors. DISCUSSION This study will provide evidence on the short-term effect of providing online information about personalised risk of cancer alongside lifestyle advice on risk perception and health-related behaviours and inform the development of interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN17450583. Registered 30 January 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet A. Usher-Smith
- The Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 113 Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK
| | - Golnessa Masson
- The Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 113 Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK
| | - Katie Mills
- The Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 113 Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK
| | - Stephen J. Sharp
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ UK
| | - Stephen Sutton
- Behavioural Science Group, The Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 113 Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK
| | | | - Simon J. Griffin
- The Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 113 Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Usher-Smith JA, Silarova B, Sharp SJ, Mills K, Griffin SJ. Effect of interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information on intentions and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e017717. [PMID: 29362249 PMCID: PMC5786113 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a comprehensive review of the impact on intention to change health-related behaviours and health-related behaviours themselves, including screening uptake, of interventions incorporating information about cancer risk targeted at the general adult population. DESIGN A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2017. INCLUSION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of interventions including provision of a personal estimate of future cancer risk based on two or more non-genetic variables to adults recruited from the general population that include at least one behavioural outcome. RESULTS We included 19 studies reporting 12 outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes between studies. There is evidence that interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information do not affect intention to attend or attendance at screening (relative risk 1.00 (0.97-1.03)). There is limited evidence that they increase smoking abstinence, sun protection, adult skin self-examination and breast examination, and decrease intention to tan. However, they do not increase smoking cessation, parental child skin examination or intention to protect skin. No studies assessed changes in diet, alcohol consumption or physical activity. CONCLUSIONS Interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information do not affect uptake of screening, but there is limited evidence of effect on some health-related behaviours. Further research, ideally including objective measures of behaviour, is needed before cancer risk information is incorporated into routine practice for health promotion in the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet A Usher-Smith
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Barbora Silarova
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen J Sharp
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katie Mills
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon J Griffin
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zierhut HA, MacFarlane IM, Ahmed Z, Davies J. Genetic Counselors’ Experiences and Interest in Telegenetics and Remote Counseling. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:329-338. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0200-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
21
|
Fowler SL, Klein WMP, Ball L, McGuire J, Colditz GA, Waters EA. Using an Internet-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool to Improve Social-Cognitive Precursors of Physical Activity. Med Decis Making 2017; 37:657-669. [PMID: 28363033 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x17699835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internet-based cancer risk assessment tools might serve as a strategy for translating epidemiological risk prediction research into public health practice. Understanding how such tools affect key social-cognitive precursors of behavior change is crucial for leveraging their potential into effective interventions. PURPOSE To test the effects of a publicly available, Internet-based, breast cancer risk assessment tool on social-cognitive precursors of physical activity. METHODS Women (N = 132) aged 40-78 with no personal cancer history indicated their perceived risk of breast cancer and were randomly assigned to receive personalized ( www.yourdiseaserisk.wustl.edu ) or nonpersonalized breast cancer risk information. Immediately thereafter, breast cancer risk perceptions and physical activity-related behavioral intentions, self-efficacy, and response efficacy were assessed. RESULTS Personalized information elicited higher intentions, self-efficacy, and response efficacy than nonpersonalized information, P values < 0.05. Self-efficacy and response efficacy mediated the effect of personalizing information on intentions. Women who received personalized information corrected their inaccurate risk perceptions to some extent, P values < 0.05, but few fully accepted the information. CONCLUSION Internet-based risk assessment tools can produce beneficial effects on important social-cognitive precursors of behavior change, but lingering skepticism, possibly due to defensive processing, needs to be addressed before the effects can be maximized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Linda Ball
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (LB, JM, GAC, EAW)
| | - Jaclyn McGuire
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (LB, JM, GAC, EAW)
| | - Graham A Colditz
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (LB, JM, GAC, EAW)
| | - Erika A Waters
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (LB, JM, GAC, EAW)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:902-933. [PMID: 28255928 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0082-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
With the advancements in precision medicine and health care reform, it is critical that genetic counseling practice respond to emerging evidence to maximize client benefit. The objective of this review was to synthesize evidence on outcomes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of genetic counseling to inform clinical practice. Seven databases were searched in conducting this review. Studies were selected for inclusion if they were: (a) RCTs published from 1990 to 2015, and (b) assessed a direct outcome of genetic counseling. Extracted data included study population, aims, and outcomes. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions guidelines. A review of 1654 abstracts identified 58 publications of 54 unique RCTs that met inclusion criteria, the vast majority of which were conducted in cancer genetic counseling setting. Twenty-seven publications assessed 'enhancements' to genetic counseling, and 31 publications compared delivery modes. The methodological rigor varied considerably, highlighting the need for attention to quality criteria in RCT design. While most studies assessed several client outcomes hypothesized to be affected by genetic counseling (e.g., psychological wellbeing, knowledge, perceived risk, patient satisfaction), disparate validated and reliable scales and other assessments were often used to evaluate the same outcome(s). This limits opportunity to compare findings across studies. While RCTs of genetic counseling demonstrate enhanced client outcomes in a number of studies and pave the way to evidence-based practice, the heterogeneity of the research questions suggest an important need for more complementary studies with consistent outcome assessments.
Collapse
|
23
|
Bould K, Daly B, Dunne S, Scott S, Asimakopoulou K. A Systematic Review of the Effect of Individualized Risk Communication Strategies on Screening Uptake and Its Psychological Predictors: The Role of Psychology Theory. Health Psychol Res 2016; 4:6157. [PMID: 28058289 PMCID: PMC5178819 DOI: 10.4081/hpr.2016.6157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 09/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
People might be more likely to attend for health screening if they are told their individual risk of an illness. The way this risk of ill-health is communicated might have an effect on screening uptake or its psychological proxies. It is possible that the format, presentation, and details of the information as well as the complexity of an intervention and use of psychological theory to inform the intervention may impact the effectiveness of individual risk communication. This systematic review collates, analyses and synthesizes the evidence for effectiveness of these aspects of individual risk communication. The synthesis indicated that written, individualized risk scores or categories are effective at supporting screening uptake and its psychological proxies. Complex, or theory-based interventions, surprisingly, are no more effective than simpler or atheoretical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Bould
- Division of Population and Patient Health, King's College London , UK
| | - Blanaid Daly
- Division of Population and Patient Health, King's College London , UK
| | - Stephen Dunne
- Division of Population and Patient Health, King's College London , UK
| | - Suzanne Scott
- Division of Population and Patient Health, King's College London , UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Légaré F, Robitaille H, Gane C, Hébert J, Labrecque M, Rousseau F. Improving Decision Making about Genetic Testing in the Clinic: An Overview of Effective Knowledge Translation Interventions. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0150123. [PMID: 26938633 PMCID: PMC4777394 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Knowledge translation (KT) interventions are attempts to change behavior in keeping with scientific evidence. While genetic tests are increasingly available to healthcare consumers in the clinic, evidence about their benefits is unclear and decisions about genetic testing are thus difficult for all parties. Objective We sought to identify KT interventions that involved decisions about genetic testing in the clinical context and to assess their effectiveness for improving decision making in terms of behavior change, increased knowledge and wellbeing. Methods We searched for trials assessing KT interventions in the context of genetic testing up to March 2014 in all systematic reviews (n = 153) published by two Cochrane review groups: Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) and Consumers and Communication. Results We retrieved 2473 unique trials of which we retained only 28 (1%). Two EPOC reviews yielded two trials of KT interventions: audit and feedback (n = 1) and educational outreach (n = 1). Both targeted health professionals and the KT intervention they assessed was found to be effective. Four Consumers and Communication reviews yielded 26 trials: decision aids (n = 15), communication of DNA-based disease risk estimates (n = 7), personalized risk communication (n = 3) and mobile phone messaging (n = 1). Among these, 25 trials targeted only health consumers or patients and the KT interventions were found to be effective in four trials, partly effective in seven, and ineffective in four. Lastly, only one trial targeted both physicians and patients and was found to be effective. Conclusions More research on the effectiveness of KT interventions regarding genetic testing in the clinical context may contribute to patients making informed value-based decisions and drawing the maximum benefit from clinical applications of genetic and genomic innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- France Légaré
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
- APOGÉE-Net/CanGèneTest Research and Knowledge Network on Health Services and Policy in Genetics and Genomics, Quebec, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Hubert Robitaille
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claire Gane
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jessica Hébert
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michel Labrecque
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
- APOGÉE-Net/CanGèneTest Research and Knowledge Network on Health Services and Policy in Genetics and Genomics, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Livaudais-Toman J, Karliner LS, Tice JA, Kerlikowske K, Gregorich S, Pérez-Stable EJ, Pasick RJ, Chen A, Quinn J, Kaplan CP. Impact of a primary care based intervention on breast cancer knowledge, risk perception and concern: A randomized, controlled trial. Breast 2015; 24:758-66. [PMID: 26476466 PMCID: PMC4698352 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2015] [Revised: 09/06/2015] [Accepted: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the effects of a tablet-based, breast cancer risk education intervention for use in primary care settings (BreastCARE) on patients' breast cancer knowledge, risk perception and concern. METHODS From June 2011-August 2012, we enrolled women from two clinics, aged 40-74 years with no personal breast cancer history, and randomized them to the BreastCARE intervention group or to the control group. All patients completed a baseline telephone survey and risk assessment (via telephone for controls, via tablet computer in clinic waiting room prior to visit for intervention). All women were categorized as high or average risk based on the Referral Screening Tool, the Gail model or the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium model. Intervention patients and their physicians received an individualized risk report to discuss during the visit. All women completed a follow-up telephone survey 1-2 weeks after risk assessment. Post-test comparisons estimated differences at follow-up in breast cancer knowledge, risk perception and concern. RESULTS 580 intervention and 655 control women completed follow-up interviews. Mean age was 56 years (SD = 9). At follow-up, 73% of controls and 71% of intervention women correctly perceived their breast cancer risk and 22% of controls and 24% of intervention women were very concerned about breast cancer. Intervention patients had greater knowledge (≥75% correct answers) of breast cancer risk factors at follow-up (24% vs. 16%; p = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, there were no differences in correct risk perception or concern, but intervention patients had greater knowledge ([OR] = 1.62; 95% [CI] = 1.19-2.23). CONCLUSIONS A simple, practical intervention involving physicians at the point of care can improve knowledge of breast cancer without increasing concern. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01830933.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Livaudais-Toman
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Leah S Karliner
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Tice
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karla Kerlikowske
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Steven Gregorich
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rena J Pasick
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alice Chen
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jessica Quinn
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Celia P Kaplan
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Prognostic Factors for Distress After Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:495-503. [PMID: 26475052 PMCID: PMC4868861 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9894-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The psychological impact of an unfavorable genetic test result for counselees at risk for hereditary cancer seems to be limited: only 10-20 % of counselees have psychological problems after testing positive for a known familial mutation. The objective of this study was to find prognostic factors that can predict which counselees are most likely to develop psychological problems after presymptomatic genetic testing. Counselees with a 50 % risk of BRCA1/2 or Lynch syndrome completed questionnaires at three time-points: after receiving a written invitation for a genetic counseling intake (T1), 2-3 days after receiving their DNA test result (T2), and 4-6 weeks later (T3). The psychological impact of the genetic test result was examined shortly and 4-6 weeks after learning their test result. Subsequently, the influence of various potentially prognostic factors on psychological impact were examined in the whole group. Data from 165 counselees were analyzed. Counselees with an unfavorable outcome did not have more emotional distress, but showed significantly more cancer worries 4-6 weeks after learning their test result. Prognostic factors for cancer worries after genetic testing were pre-existing cancer worries, being single, a high risk perception of getting cancer, and an unfavorable test result. Emotional distress was best predicted by pre-existing cancer worries and pre-existing emotional distress. The psychological impact of an unfavorable genetic test result appears considerable if it is measured as "worries about cancer." Genetic counselors should provide additional guidance to counselees with many cancer worries, emotional distress, a high risk perception or a weak social network.
Collapse
|
27
|
O'Shea R, Meany M, Carroll C, Cody N, Healy D, Green A, Lynch SA. Predictive Genetic Testing and Alternatives to Face to Face Results Disclosure: A Retrospective Review of Patients Preference for Alternative Modes of BRCA 1 and 2 Results Disclosure in the Republic of Ireland. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:422-31. [PMID: 26407988 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9887-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2015] [Accepted: 08/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The traditional model of providing cancer predictive testing services is changing. Many genetic centres are now offering a choice to patients in how they receive their results instead of the typical face-to-face disclosure. In view of this shift in practice and the increasing demand on the ROI cancer predictive testing service, a 2 year retrospective study on patient preference in how to receive a Breast Cancer (BRCA) predictive result was carried out. Results showed that 71.7 % of respondents would have liked to have the option of obtaining their results by telephone or by letter. However, when asked about their actual experience of BRCA predictive results disclosure 40.6 % did still value the face-to-face contact, while 44.9 % would still have preferred to receive results by either post or telephone. No significant difference was found between males and females (p > 0.05) and those who tested negative or positive for the BRCA mutation (p > 0.05) in wanting a choice in how their results were disclosed. While the majority expressed a wish to have a choice in how to receive their results, it is important not to underestimate the value of a face-to-face encounter in these circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie O'Shea
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Our Lady's Hospital for Children, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Marie Meany
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Our Lady's Hospital for Children, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cliona Carroll
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Our Lady's Hospital for Children, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nuala Cody
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Our Lady's Hospital for Children, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David Healy
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Our Lady's Hospital for Children, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Andrew Green
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Our Lady's Hospital for Children, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sally Ann Lynch
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Our Lady's Hospital for Children, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
A Comparison of Telephone Genetic Counseling and In-Person Genetic Counseling from the Genetic Counselor’s Perspective. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:112-26. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9848-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2014] [Accepted: 05/18/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
29
|
Patrick-Miller LJ, Egleston BL, Fetzer D, Forman A, Bealin L, Rybak C, Peterson C, Corbman M, Albarracin J, Stevens E, Daly MB, Bradbury AR. Development of a communication protocol for telephone disclosure of genetic test results for cancer predisposition. JMIR Res Protoc 2014; 3:e49. [PMID: 25355401 PMCID: PMC4259920 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.3337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2014] [Revised: 06/12/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dissemination of genetic testing for disease susceptibility, one application of “personalized medicine”, holds the potential to empower patients and providers through informed risk reduction and prevention recommendations. Genetic testing has become a standard practice in cancer prevention for high-risk populations. Heightened consumer awareness of “cancer genes” and genes for other diseases (eg, cardiovascular and Alzheimer’s disease), as well as the burgeoning availability of increasingly complex genomic tests (ie, multi-gene, whole-exome and -genome sequencing), has escalated interest in and demand for genetic risk assessment and the specialists who provide it. Increasing demand is expected to surpass access to genetic specialists. Thus, there is urgent need to develop effective and efficient models of delivery of genetic information that comparably balance the risks and benefits to the current standard of in-person communication. Objective The aim of this pilot study was to develop and evaluate a theoretically grounded and rigorously developed protocol for telephone communication of BRCA1/2 (breast cancer) test results that might be generalizable to genetic testing for other hereditary cancer and noncancer syndromes. Methods Stakeholder data, health communication literature, and our theoretical model grounded in Self-Regulation Theory of Health Behavior were used to develop a telephone communication protocol for the communication of BRCA1/2 genetic test results. Framework analysis of selected audiotapes of disclosure sessions and stakeholders’ feedback were utilized to evaluate the efficacy and inform refinements to this protocol. Results Stakeholder feedback (n=86) and audiotapes (38%, 33/86) of telephone disclosures revealed perceived disadvantages and challenges including environmental factors (eg, non-private environment), patient-related factors (eg, low health literacy), testing-related factors (eg, additional testing needed), and communication factors (eg, no visual cues). Resulting modifications to the communication protocol for BRCA1/2 test results included clarified patient instructions, scheduled appointments, refined visual aids, expanded disclosure checklist items, and enhanced provider training. Conclusions Analyses of stakeholders’ experiences and audiotapes of telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 test results informed revisions to communication strategies and a protocol to enhance patient outcomes when utilizing telephone to disclose genetic test results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J Patrick-Miller
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Disparities in uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in a randomized trial of telephone counseling. Genet Med 2014; 17:467-75. [PMID: 25232856 PMCID: PMC4364924 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose As genetic counseling and testing become more fully-integrated into clinical care, alternative delivery models are increasingly prominent. This study examines predictors of genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer among high-risk women in a randomized trial of in-person vs. telephone-based genetic counseling. Methods Methods include multivariable logistic regression and interaction analyses. Results Of the 669 participants, 600 completed counseling and 523 received test results. As previously reported, participants randomized to telephone counseling were significantly less likely to be tested. In intention to treat analyses, completion of counseling and testing was associated with: race/ethnicity (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.20-3.20), , perceived stress (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.98, knowledge (OR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.23), and randomization group (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.01-2.16).. Further, race/ethnicity moderated the association between randomization group and testing, where minority women receiving telephone counseling were least likely to complete testing. Conclusion Evidence for logistical and communication-based explanations for this interaction are presented. The overall increased access made possible with telephone genetic counseling should be considered in light of the possibility that this may also lead to lower rates of testing among high-risk minority women. Additional care should be taken to assess and address potential barriers when services are delivered by phone.
Collapse
|
31
|
Sweeny K, Ghane A, Legg AM, Huynh HP, Andrews SE. Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:263-88. [PMID: 24719248 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9712-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2013] [Accepted: 03/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing is increasingly available in medical settings and direct-to-consumer. However, the large and growing literature on genetic testing decisions is rife with conflicting findings, inconsistent methodology, and uneven attention across test types and across predictors of genetic testing decisions. Existing reviews of the literature draw broad conclusions but sacrifice nuanced analysis that with a closer look reveals far more inconsistency than homogeny across studies. The goals of this paper are to provide a systematic review of the empirical work on predictors of genetic testing decisions, highlight areas of consistency and inconsistency, and suggest productive directions for future research. We included all studies that provided quantitative analysis of subjective (e.g., perceived risk, perceived benefits of testing) and/or objective (e.g., family history, sociodemographic variables) predictors of genetic testing interest, intentions, or uptake, which produced a sample of 115 studies. From this review, we conclude that self-reported and test-related (as opposed to disorder-related or objective) predictors are relatively consistent across studies but that theoretically-driven efforts to examine testing interest across test types are sorely needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Sweeny
- Department of Psychology, University of California, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA, 92521, USA,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kelly KM, Ellington L, Schoenberg N, Agarwal P, Jackson T, Dickinson S, Abraham J, Paskett ED, Leventhal H, Andrykowski M. Linking genetic counseling content to short-term outcomes in individuals at elevated breast cancer risk. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:838-48. [PMID: 24671341 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9705-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2012] [Accepted: 02/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Few studies have linked actual genetic counseling content to short-term outcomes. Using the Self-regulation Model, the impact of cognitive and affective content in genetic counseling on short-term outcomes was studied in individuals at elevated risk of familial breast-ovarian cancer. Surveys assessed dependent variables: distress, perceived risk, and 6 knowledge measures (Meaning of Positive Test; Meaning of Negative Test; Personal Behavior; Practitioner Knowledge; Mechanisms of Cancer Inheritance; Frequency of Inherited Cancer) measured at pre- and post-counseling. Proportion of participant cognitive and affective and counselor cognitive and affective content during sessions (using LIWC software) were predictors in regressions. Knowledge increased for 5 measures and decreased for Personal Behavior, Distress and Perceived Risk. Controlling for age and education, results were significant/marginally significant for three measures. More counselor content was associated with decreases in knowledge of Personal Behavior. More participant and less counselor affective content was associated with gains in Practitioner Knowledge. More counselor cognitive, and interaction of counselor cognitive and affective content, were associated with higher perceived risk. Genetic counselors dominate the content of counseling sessions. Therefore, their content is tied more closely to short term outcomes than participant content. A lack of patient communication in sessions may pose problems for understanding of complex concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly M Kelly
- School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dilworth S, Higgins I, Parker V, Kelly B, Turner J. Patient and health professional's perceived barriers to the delivery of psychosocial care to adults with cancer: a systematic review. Psychooncology 2014; 23:601-12. [PMID: 24519814 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2013] [Revised: 11/29/2013] [Accepted: 12/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the barriers experienced and perceived by health professionals and patients in the delivery of psychosocial care to adults with cancer. METHODS Systematic searches were undertaken using the PsychInfo, Medline and CINAHL electronic databases, up to October 2013. Research reporting health professional or patient experiences and perceptions of barriers to psychosocial care are included in the review. The systematic review includes studies that have non-experimental, exploratory and observational designs, as is appropriate to answer the review question. Included studies were critically appraised. The results of individual quantitative studies were aggregated. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the qualitative results. RESULTS Twenty-five papers met the pre-specified inclusion criteria for the final review. The most commonly perceived barrier for patients relates to receiving adequate support from elsewhere and a lack of perceived need for psychosocial care. Health professionals report barriers at an organisational level most frequently followed by cultural and then individual clinician-related barriers. CONCLUSIONS Barriers exist on a variety of levels. People with cancer need clear appropriate information and communication about psychosocial services, including information about the role of psychosocial care in addition to existing supports. Interventions that target the complex interplay of individual, organisational and cultural factors need to be developed. Strategies that improve health professional communication skills, identify clear referral pathways, improve acceptability of interventions and clearly identify the need for services could address many of the barriers identified in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Dilworth
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schwartz MD, Valdimarsdottir HB, Peshkin BN, Mandelblatt J, Nusbaum R, Huang AT, Chang Y, Graves K, Isaacs C, Wood M, McKinnon W, Garber J, McCormick S, Kinney AY, Luta G, Kelleher S, Leventhal KG, Vegella P, Tong A, King L. Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:618-26. [PMID: 24449235 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.51.3226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although guidelines recommend in-person counseling before BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing, genetic counseling is increasingly offered by telephone. As genomic testing becomes more common, evaluating alternative delivery approaches becomes increasingly salient. We tested whether telephone delivery of BRCA1/2 genetic counseling was noninferior to in-person delivery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants (women age 21 to 85 years who did not have newly diagnosed or metastatic cancer and lived within a study site catchment area) were randomly assigned to usual care (UC; n = 334) or telephone counseling (TC; n = 335). UC participants received in-person pre- and post-test counseling; TC participants completed all counseling by telephone. Primary outcomes were knowledge, satisfaction, decision conflict, distress, and quality of life; secondary outcomes were equivalence of BRCA1/2 test uptake and costs of delivering TC versus UC. RESULTS TC was noninferior to UC on all primary outcomes. At 2 weeks after pretest counseling, knowledge (d = 0.03; lower bound of 97.5% CI, -0.61), perceived stress (d = -0.12; upper bound of 97.5% CI, 0.21), and satisfaction (d = -0.16; lower bound of 97.5% CI, -0.70) had group differences and confidence intervals that did not cross their 1-point noninferiority limits. Decision conflict (d = 1.1; upper bound of 97.5% CI, 3.3) and cancer distress (d = -1.6; upper bound of 97.5% CI, 0.27) did not cross their 4-point noninferiority limit. Results were comparable at 3 months. TC was not equivalent to UC on BRCA1/2 test uptake (UC, 90.1%; TC, 84.2%). TC yielded cost savings of $114 per patient. CONCLUSION Genetic counseling can be effectively and efficiently delivered via telephone to increase access and decrease costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc D Schwartz
- Marc D. Schwartz, Beth N. Peshkin, Jeanne Mandelblatt, Rachel Nusum, An-Tsun Huang, Yaojen Chang, Kristi Graves, Claudine Isaacs, George Luta, Sarah Kelleher, Kara-Grace Leventhal, Patti Vegella, Angie Tong, and Lesley King, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; Marie Wood and Wendy McKinnon, Familial Cancer Program of the Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; Judy Garber and Shelley McCormick, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Anita Y. Kinney, University of Utah School of Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Patrick-Miller L, Egleston BL, Daly M, Stevens E, Fetzer D, Forman A, Bealin L, Rybak C, Peterson C, Corbman M, Bradbury AR. Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2013; 93:413-419. [PMID: 24075727 PMCID: PMC4199583 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2012] [Revised: 08/05/2013] [Accepted: 08/11/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES With an increasing demand for genetic services, effective and efficient delivery models for genetic testing are needed. METHODS In this prospective single-arm communication study, participants received clinical BRCA1/2 results by telephone with a genetic counselor and completed surveys at baseline, after telephone disclosure (TD) and after in-person clinical follow-up. RESULTS Sixty percent of women agreed to participate; 73% of decliners preferred in-person communication. Anxiety decreased from baseline to post-TD (p=0.03) and satisfaction increased (p<0.01). Knowledge did not change significantly from baseline to post-TD, but was higher post-clinical follow-up (p=0.04). Cancer patients had greater declines in state anxiety and African-American participants reported less increase in satisfaction. 28% of participants did not return for in-person clinical follow-up, particularly those with less formal education, and higher post-disclosure anxiety and depression (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 test results may not be associated with negative cognitive and affective responses among willing patients, although some subgroups may experience less favorable responses. Some patients do not return for in-person clinical follow-up and longitudinal outcomes are unknown. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Further evaluation of longitudinal outcomes of telephone disclosure and differences among subgroups can inform how to best incorporate telephone communication into delivery of genetic services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Patrick-Miller
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology–Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | | | - Mary Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Evelyn Stevens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Dominique Fetzer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology–Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Andrea Forman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Lisa Bealin
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Christina Rybak
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Candace Peterson
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Melanie Corbman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Angela R. Bradbury
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology–Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Vig HS, Wang C. The evolution of personalized cancer genetic counseling in the era of personalized medicine. Fam Cancer 2013; 11:539-44. [PMID: 22419176 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9524-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Practice changes in cancer genetic counseling have occurred to meet the demand for cancer genetic services. As cancer genetics continues to impact not only prevention strategies but also treatment decisions, current cancer genetic counseling models will need to be tailored to accommodate emerging clinical indications. These clinical indications include: surgical prophylactic bilateral mastectomy candidates, PARP-inhibitor candidates, patients with abnormal tumor screening results for Lynch syndrome, and post-test counseling patients (after genetic testing is ordered by another healthcare provider). A more personalized, multidisciplinary approach to selecting the best framework, for a given clinical indication, may become increasingly necessary in this era of personalized medicine.
Collapse
|
37
|
Edwards AGK, Naik G, Ahmed H, Elwyn GJ, Pickles T, Hood K, Playle R. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD001865. [PMID: 23450534 PMCID: PMC6464864 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001865.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a trend towards greater patient involvement in healthcare decisions. Although screening is usually perceived as good for the health of the population, there are risks associated with the tests involved. Achieving both adequate involvement of consumers and informed decision making are now seen as important goals for screening programmes. Personalised risk estimates have been shown to be effective methods of risk communication. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of personalised risk communication on informed decision making by individuals taking screening tests. We also assess individual components that constitute informed decisions. SEARCH METHODS Two authors searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2012), MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), CINAHL (EbscoHOST) and PsycINFO (OvidSP) without language restrictions. We searched from 2006 to March 2012. The date ranges for the previous searches were from 1989 to December 2005 for PsycINFO and from 1985 to December 2005 for other databases. For the original version of this review, we also searched CancerLit and Science Citation Index (March 2001). We also reviewed the reference lists and conducted citation searches of included studies and other systematic reviews in the field, to identify any studies missed during the initial search. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials incorporating an intervention with a 'personalised risk communication element' for individuals undergoing screening procedures, and reporting measures of informed decisions and also cognitive, affective, or behavioural outcomes addressing the decision by such individuals, of whether or not to undergo screening. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed each included trial for risk of bias, and extracted data. We extracted data about the nature and setting of interventions, and relevant outcome data. We used standard statistical methods to combine data using RevMan version 5, including analysis according to different levels of detail of personalised risk communication, different conditions for screening, and studies based only on high-risk participants rather than people at 'average' risk. MAIN RESULTS We included 41 studies involving 28,700 people. Nineteen new studies were identified in this update, adding to the 22 studies included in the previous two iterations of the review. Three studies measured informed decision with regard to the uptake of screening following personalised risk communication as a part of their intervention. All of these three studies were at low risk of bias and there was strong evidence that the interventions enhanced informed decision making, although with heterogeneous results. Overall 45.2% (592/1309) of participants who received personalised risk information made informed choices, compared to 20.2% (229/1135) of participants who received generic risk information. The overall odds ratios (ORs) for informed decision were 4.48 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.62 to 5.53 for fixed effect) and 3.65 (95% CI 2.13 to 6.23 for random effects). Nine studies measured increase in knowledge, using different scales. All of these studies showed an increase in knowledge with personalised risk communication. In three studies the interventions showed a trend towards more accurate risk perception, but the evidence was of poor quality. Four out of six studies reported non-significant changes in anxiety following personalised risk communication to the participants. Overall there was a small non-significant decrease in the anxiety scores. Most studies (32/41) measured the uptake of screening tests following interventions. Our results (OR 1.15 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.29)) constitute low quality evidence, consistent with a small effect, that personalised risk communication in which a risk score was provided (6 studies) or the participants were given their categorised risk (6 studies), increases uptake of screening tests. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is strong evidence from three trials that personalised risk estimates incorporated within communication interventions for screening programmes enhance informed choices. However the evidence for increasing the uptake of such screening tests with similar interventions is weak, and it is not clear if this increase is associated with informed choices. Studies included a diverse range of screening programmes. Therefore, data from this review do not allow us to draw conclusions about the best interventions to deliver personalised risk communication for enhancing informed decisions. The results are dominated by findings from the topic area of mammography and colorectal cancer. Caution is therefore required in generalising from these results, and particularly for clinical topics other than mammography and colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian G K Edwards
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School ofMedicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Belkora J, Stupar L, O'Donnell S, Loucks A, Moore D, Jupiter C, Johnson N, Wilson L. Decision support by telephone: randomized controlled trial in a rural community setting. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2012; 89:134-142. [PMID: 22776761 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2011] [Revised: 05/24/2012] [Accepted: 06/06/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our community-based participatory research partnership previously evaluated Consultation Planning (CP), a question-listing intervention delivered in-person. We now report on effectiveness, cost, and value of delivering CP by telephone (Tele-CP). METHODS Between 2007 and 2010, we randomly assigned rural women with a diagnosis of breast cancer to receive Tele-CP or In-Person CP. We compared ratings of decision self-efficacy (0 minimum to 4 maximum) with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 15%. We also explored psychosocial and economic outcomes. RESULTS Tele-CP (n=35) recipients reported mean decision self-efficacy ratings of 3.53 versus 3.44 for in-person (n=32). Under intent-to-treat analysis, we rejected the null hypothesis of greater than 0.52 inferiority for Tele-CP (95% CI for difference: -0.44 to 0.13, p=0.006). The intervention costs averaged $48 for Tele-CP versus $78 in-person (95% CI for difference: -$63 to $2). Mean willingness-to-pay was $154 for Tele-CP and $144 for in-person (95% CI for difference: -$88 to $108). CONCLUSION Tele-CP was non-inferior to In-Person CP, cost no more, and was equally valued by patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Telephone delivery of Consultation Planning can achieve comparable quality, cost, and value as in-person. Organizations offering Consultation Planning or similar question-listing interventions should consider adopting telephone delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Belkora
- Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94118-1944, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Platten U, Rantala J, Lindblom A, Brandberg Y, Lindgren G, Arver B. The use of telephone in genetic counseling versus in-person counseling: a randomized study on counselees' outcome. Fam Cancer 2012; 11:371-9. [PMID: 22399327 PMCID: PMC3496516 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9522-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Increased demand for genetic counseling services necessitates exploring alternatives to in-person counseling. Telephone counseling is a less time-consuming and more cost-effective alternative. So far there is insufficient evidence to support a pre-counseling telephone model. This randomized questionnaire study aims to evaluate the oncogenetic counseling process and to compare the impact of the initial part of the oncogenetic counseling, when conducted via telephone versus in-person. The aspects of evaluations were: patients' expectations, satisfaction and experiences of genetic counseling, worry for developing hereditary cancer and health related quality of life. A total of 215 participants representing several cancer syndromes were randomized to counseling via telephone or in-person. The questionnaires were completed before and after oncogenetic nurse counseling, and 1 year after the entire counseling process. Overall, a high satisfaction rate with the oncogenetic counseling process was found among the participants regardless of whether the oncogenetic nurse counseling was conducted by telephone or in-person. The results show that a considerable number of participants experienced difficulties with the process of creating a pedigree and dissatisfaction with information on surveillance and prevention. Affected participants reported lower levels in most SF-36 domains compared to non-affected and both groups reported lower levels as compared to a Swedish reference group. The results indicate that telephone pre-counseling works as well as in-person counseling. Emotional support during genetic counseling and information on recommended cancer prevention and surveillance should be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulla Platten
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johanna Rantala
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yvonne Brandberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunilla Lindgren
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brita Arver
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rothwell E, Kohlmann W, Jasperson K, Gammon A, Wong B, Kinney A. Patient outcomes associated with group and individual genetic counseling formats. Fam Cancer 2012; 11:97-106. [PMID: 22057473 PMCID: PMC7462715 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-011-9486-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Identifying new methods to deliver cancer genetic counseling (GC) are needed to meet the growing interest in BRCA1/2 testing. The goal of this pilot feasibility study was designed to test the initial acceptability of group GC on selected patient outcomes (satisfaction, distress, perceived control) in a breast/ovarian cancer genetics clinic setting. Sixty-five participants at increased risk for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) agreed to participate in self-selected individual or group GC appointments. Forty-nine participants completed all study questionnaires and were included in the analyses. There were significant improvements for participants in both the individual and group GC formats with regard to perceived personal control, general psychological distress and cancer-specific psychological distress scores. Participants in both the individual and group formats reported high satisfaction scores on the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale. Study results suggest that group GC may be feasible and acceptable to high-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Rothwell
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hilgart JS, Coles B, Iredale R. Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2012:CD003721. [PMID: 22336791 PMCID: PMC7154385 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003721.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recognition of an inherited component to breast cancer has led to an increase in demand for information, reassurance, and genetic testing, which has resulted in the creation of genetic clinics for familial cancer. The first step for patients referred to a cancer genetic clinic is a risk assessment. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of cancer genetic risk-assessment services on patients at risk of familial breast cancer. SEARCH METHODS The specialised register maintained by the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 16th February 2005. We also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycLIT, CENTRAL, DARE, ASSIA, Web of Science, SIGLE and LILACS. The original searches covered the period 1985 to February 2005. We also handsearched relevant journals. For this review update the search was repeated through to April 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered trials looking at interventions for cancer genetic risk-assessment services for familial breast cancer for inclusion. Trials assessed outcomes such as understanding of risk, satisfaction and psychological well-being. We excluded studies if they concerned cancers other than breast cancer or if participants were not at risk of inherited breast cancer. We also excluded trials concerning the provision of general cancer genetic information or education as this review was concerned with the delivery of genetic risk assessment. Participants could be individuals of any age or gender, with or without a known BRCA mutation, but without a previous history of breast cancer or any other serious illness. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Additional information was sought from investigators as necessary. Due to the heterogeneity of both the interventions and outcomes, we reported data descriptively. MAIN RESULTS In this review update, we included five new trials, bringing the total number of included studies to eight. The included trials (pertaining to 10 papers), provided data on 1973 participants and assessed the impact of cancer genetic risk assessment on outcomes including perceived risk of inherited cancer, and psychological distress. This review suggests that cancer genetic risk-assessment services help to reduce distress, improve the accuracy of the perceived risk of breast cancer, and increase knowledge about breast cancer and genetics. The health professional delivering the risk assessment does not appear to have a significant impact on these outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review found favourable outcomes for patients after risk assessment for familial breast cancer. However, there were too few papers to make any significant conclusions about how best to deliver cancer genetic risk-assessment services. Further research is needed assessing the best means of delivering cancer risk assessment, by different health professionals, in different ways and in alternative locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Hilgart
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK, CF14 4XN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Voorwinden JS, Jaspers JPC, ter Beest JG, Kievit Y, Sijmons RH, Oosterwijk JC. The introduction of a choice to learn pre-symptomatic DNA test results for BRCA or Lynch syndrome either face-to-face or by letter. Clin Genet 2011; 81:421-9. [PMID: 22091929 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01811.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In predictive DNA testing for hereditary cancer, test results should traditionally be disclosed face-to-face. Increasingly, however, counselees ask to receive their test result at home by letter. To compare the quality of genetic counselling in the traditional way to a procedure in which counselees are offered a choice on how to get their test result. Counselees from families with a known BRCA1/2 or Lynch syndrome mutation were randomised into two groups. The control group was given the DNA test result in a face-to-face consultation. In the intervention group people could choose to learn their test result face-to-face or by letter. The quality of genetic counselling was assessed through questionnaires at three different moments. Data of 198 counselees were analysed. The quality of genetic counselling and psychological functioning were equally good in both groups. The majority of cases chose for disclosure by letter. The counselees with a good test result in the intervention group were the most satisfied. Our results indicate that in predictive DNA testing for BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndrome, a choice protocol is equally safe and more satisfying. Moreover, it is more efficient for both counsellor and counselee.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Voorwinden
- Department of Medical Psychology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hilgart J, Hayward JA, Iredale R. E-genetics: exploring the acceptability and feasibility of using technology in cancer genetics services. Clin Genet 2011; 81:514-20. [PMID: 22091995 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01813.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the delivery of cancer genetics services could improve equality of access in rural areas and help meet the increasing demand for specialist genetics services. An online patient survey and focus groups with patients and staff from the Cancer Genetics Service for Wales (CGSW) were used to explore the acceptability and feasibility of utilizing ICTs within genetics services, which we have termed e-genetics. A total of 225 patients completed the online survey. Many aspects of e-genetics proposed in the survey were highly acceptable to patients, including an electronic version of the family history questionnaire, an email facility for cancer genetic queries, and a computerized decision-aid. Participants in the focus groups emphasized the importance of patient choice when developing new models of service delivery. For example, the use of genetic counselling via telemedicine was not considered to be preferable to face-to-face clinic appointments but could benefit those unable to travel. This article highlights the fact that e-genetics initiatives may not be appropriate for all cancer genetics service users. However, user-friendly developments that can be easily implemented and attend to individual needs could improve efficiency and cost-effectiveness, whilst providing high-quality services to remote areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Hilgart
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
One barrier to genetic testing is the lack of access to genetic counselors. We provided cancer genetic counseling via telephone, through a pilot project for employees of a national health insurer, Aetna, Inc. Knowledge transfer, behavioral intentions, and patient satisfaction were assessed by survey after genetic counseling. Aetna sent an individual email to its employees nationwide notifying them of the availability of a new telephone genetic counseling and testing program and providing a link to take a brief screening questionnaire to determine whether they may be at risk of hereditary cancer. Employees completing the questionnaire received immediate feedback regarding whether there appeared to be a risk of hereditary cancer. If so, they were invited to schedule a telephonic genetic counseling session. After the session, respondents completed an online survey. 397 individuals completed the questionnaire. 39 proceeded with telephone genetic counseling, and 22 completed the follow-up survey, including all 11 women with family history warranting genetic testing. One third reported prior discussion about inherited cancer risk with their primary care provider (PCP); 12% were referred to a geneticist; 20% had an accurate perception of their own cancer risk. After counseling, 94% reported understanding their risk for cancer and 87% were aware of available risk-reduction strategies. 87% of high-risk respondents intended to engage in risk-management interventions. 93% reported high satisfaction. 66% indicated they would not have pursued genetic counseling if it had not been available by phone. Results suggest telephone counseling is a viable option for increasing access to genetic experts. In this sample, telephone counseling increases knowledge of cancer risk, motivates intention to change health-related behaviors, and elicits a high satisfaction level. Consequently, Aetna now offers telephone cancer genetic counseling nationwide as a covered benefit.
Collapse
|
45
|
Pal T, Stowe C, Cole A, Lee JH, Zhao X, Vadaparampil S. Evaluation of phone-based genetic counselling in African American women using culturally tailored visual aids. Clin Genet 2010; 78:124-31. [PMID: 20662853 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01466.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Genetic counselling (GC) services for inherited breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) are underutilized by African American (AA) women. We sought to evaluate factors associated with knowledge gain in a sample of AA women diagnosed with early-onset breast cancer, in whom GC for HBOC was provided, using a culturally targeted genetic counselling aid (GCA). Through a cancer registry-based study, phone-based GC for HBOC was offered to AA women with breast cancer < or =50. A questionnaire to assess knowledge about HBOC was completed prior to GC. All women were provided a GCA about HBOC developed by the investigative team for use during the GC session. Following GC, a personalized summary letter was mailed to all study participants and the same knowledge questionnaire was completed. A total of 37 study participants completed the pre- and post-GC knowledge questionnaires with significant gains in knowledge following the GC process (p < 0.0001). Statistically significant factors associated with knowledge gain included earlier stage of diagnosis of breast cancer and education level. Our results indicate that phone-based GC supplemented by a culturally targeted visual aid is an effective means of improving knowledge about HBOC in young AA women with invasive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Pal
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Tampa, Florida, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller L, Fetzer D, Egleston B, Cummings SA, Forman A, Bealin L, Peterson C, Corbman M, O'Connell J, Daly MB. Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test results. Clin Genet 2010; 79:125-31. [PMID: 21039431 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01540.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BRCA1/2 test disclosure has, historically, been conducted in-person by genetics professionals. Given increasing demand for, and access to, genetic testing, interest in telephone and Internet genetic services, including disclosure of test results, has increased. Semi-structured interviews with genetic counselors were conducted to determine interest in, and experiences with telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 test results. Descriptive data are summarized with response proportions. One hundred and ninety-four genetic counselors completed self-administered surveys via the web. Although 98% had provided BRCA1/2 results by telephone, 77% had never provided pre-test counseling by telephone. Genetic counselors reported perceived advantages and disadvantages to telephone disclosure. Thirty-two percent of participants described experiences that made them question this practice. Genetic counselors more frequently reported discomfort with telephone disclosure of a positive result or variant of uncertain significance (p < 0.01) than other results. Overall, 73% of participants reported interest in telephone disclosure. Many genetic counselors have provided telephone disclosure, however, most, infrequently. Genetic counselors identify potential advantages and disadvantages to telephone disclosure, and recognize the potential for testing and patient factors to impact patient outcomes. Further research evaluating the impact of testing and patient factors on cognitive, affective, social and behavioral outcomes of alternative models of communicating genetic information is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Bradbury
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Doughty Rice C, Ruschman JG, Martin LJ, Manders JB, Miller E. Retrospective comparison of patient outcomes after in-person and telephone results disclosure counseling for BRCA1/2 genetic testing. Fam Cancer 2010; 9:203-12. [PMID: 20473602 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9303-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 molecular genetic test results has been proposed as a feasible alternative to traditional in-person results disclosure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between method of result disclosure with the patient outcome variables of knowledge, cancer worry, cancer risk perception, satisfaction, and cancer screening and prophylactic surgery behaviors. Study participants included 228 women who completed retrospective, self-administered, mailed surveys regarding their pre-test genetic counseling and results disclosure. No significant relationships were found between result disclosure method and the outcome variables investigated. A majority (90%) of individuals who received positive results by telephone returned for follow up visits. Factors which genetic counselors believed influenced their clinical decision to offer telephone disclosure, such as history of breast cancer, a priori risk of genetic mutation and family history of known mutation were not shown to significantly impact the actual disclosure method. This study suggests that telephone results disclosure is clinically appropriate when counselors utilize their clinical judgment to determine which patients are appropriate candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Doughty Rice
- Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Patrick-Miller L, Bradbury AR, Terry MB. Controversies in communication of genetic screening results for cancer: a report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology's Screening Special Interest Group (ASPO's 33rd Annual Meeting, March 8 to 10, 2009, Tampa, Florida). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19:624-7. [PMID: 20142257 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-2-aspo01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
49
|
O'Daniel JM. The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 2010; 19:315-27. [PMID: 20440545 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9302-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2009] [Accepted: 04/07/2010] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
One of the major anticipated benefits of genomic medicine is the area of preventive medicine. Commercially available genomic profiling is now able to generate risk information for a number of common conditions several of which have recognized preventive guidelines. Similarly, family history assessment affords powerful health risk prediction based on the shared genetic, physical and lifestyle environments within families. Thus, with the ability to help predict disease risk and enable preemptive health plans, genome-guided preventive medicine has the potential to improve population health on an individualized level. To realize this potential, steps to broaden access to accurate genomic health information must be considered. With expertise in genetic science, risk assessment and communication, and a patient-centered practice approach, genetic counselors are poised to play a critical role in facilitating the incorporation of genomic health risks into the burgeoning field of genome-guided preventive medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julianne M O'Daniel
- Duke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, 450 Research Drive, LSRC B342C, Box 91009, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Harle CA, Downs JS, Padman R. A clustering approach to segmenting users of internet-based risk calculators. Methods Inf Med 2010; 50:244-52. [PMID: 20300681 DOI: 10.3414/me09-01-0080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2009] [Accepted: 02/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk calculators are widely available Internet applications that deliver quantitative health risk estimates to consumers. Although these tools are known to have varying effects on risk perceptions, little is known about who will be more likely to accept objective risk estimates. OBJECTIVE To identify clusters of online health consumers that help explain variation in individual improvement in risk perceptions from web-based quantitative disease risk information. METHODS A secondary analysis was performed on data collected in a field experiment that measured people's pre-diabetes risk perceptions before and after visiting a realistic health promotion website that provided quantitative risk information. K-means clustering was performed on numerous candidate variable sets, and the different segmentations were evaluated based on between-cluster variation in risk perception improvement. RESULTS Variation in responses to risk information was best explained by clustering on pre-intervention absolute pre-diabetes risk perceptions and an objective estimate of personal risk. Members of a high-risk overestimater cluster showed large improvements in their risk perceptions, but clusters of both moderate-risk and high-risk underestimaters were much more muted in improving their optimistically biased perceptions. CONCLUSIONS Cluster analysis provided a unique approach for segmenting health consumers and predicting their acceptance of quantitative disease risk information. These clusters suggest that health consumers were very responsive to good news, but tended not to incorporate bad news into their self-perceptions much. These findings help to quantify variation among online health consumers and may inform the targeted marketing of and improvements to risk communication tools on the Internet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Harle
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100195, Gainesville, FL 32610-0195, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|