The somatostatin sst1 receptor: an autoreceptor for somatostatin in brain and retina?

From representations to servomechanisms to oscillators: my journey in the study of cognition

The study of comparative cognition bloomed in the 1970s and 1980s with a focus on representations in the heads of animals that undergird what animals can achieve. Even in action-packed domains such as navigation and spatial cognition, a focus on representations prevailed. In the 1990s, I suggested a conception of navigation in terms of navigational servomechanisms. A servomechanism can be said to aim for a goal, with deviations from the goal-directed path registering as an error. The error drives action to reduce the error in a negative-feedback loop. This loop, with the action reducing the very signal that drove action in the first place, is key to defining a servomechanism. Even though actions are crucial components of servomechanisms, my focus was on the representational component that encodes signals and evaluates errors. Recently, I modified and amplified this view in claiming that, in navigation, servomechanisms operate by modulating the performance of oscillators, endogenous units that produce periodic action. The pattern is found from bacteria travelling micrometres to sea turtles travelling thousands of kilometres. This pattern of servomechanisms working with oscillators is found in other realms of cognition and of life. I think that oscillators provide an effective way to organise an organism's own activities while servomechanisms provide an effective means to adjust to the organism's environment, including that of its own body.

Relevance of Peptide Homeostasis in Metabolic Retinal Degenerative Disorders: Curative Potential in Genetically Modified Mice

The mammalian retina contains approximately 30 neuropeptides that are synthetized by different neuronal cell populations, glia, and the pigmented epithelium. The presence of these neuropeptides leaves a mark on normal retinal molecular processes and physiology, and they are also crucial in fighting various pathologies (e.g., diabetic retinopathy, ischemia, age-related pathologies, glaucoma) because of their protective abilities. Retinal pathologies of different origin (metabolic, genetic) are extensively investigated by genetically manipulated in vivo mouse models that help us gain a better understanding of the molecular background of these pathomechanisms. These models offer opportunities to manipulate gene expression in different cell types to help reveal their roles in the preservation of retinal health or identify malfunction during diseases. In order to assess the current status of transgenic technologies available, we have conducted a literature survey focused on retinal disorders of metabolic origin, zooming in on the role of retinal neuropeptides in diabetic retinopathy and ischemia. First, we identified those neuropeptides that are most relevant to retinal pathologies in humans and the two clinically most relevant models, mice and rats. Then we continued our analysis with metabolic disorders, examining neuropeptide-related pathways leading to systemic or cellular damage and rescue. Last but not least, we reviewed the available literature on genetically modified mouse strains to understand how the manipulation of a single element of any given pathway (e.g., signal molecules, receptors, intracellular signaling pathways) could lead either to the worsening of disease conditions or, more frequently, to substantial improvements in retinal health. Most attention was given to studies which reported successful intervention against specific disorders. For these experiments, a detailed evaluation will be given and the possible role of converging intracellular pathways will be discussed. Using these converging intracellular pathways, curative effects of peptides could potentially be utilized in fighting metabolic retinal disorders.

Somatostatin, a Presynaptic Modulator of Glutamatergic Signal in the Central Nervous System

Somatostatin is widely diffused in the central nervous system, where it participates to control the efficiency of synaptic transmission. This peptide mainly colocalizes with GABA, in inhibitory, GABA-containing interneurons from which it is actively released in a Ca²⁺ dependent manner upon application of depolarizing stimuli. Once released in the synaptic cleft, somatostatin acts locally, or it diffuses in the extracellular space through "volume diffusion", a mechanism(s) of distribution which mainly operates in the cerebrospinal fluid and that assures the progression of neuronal signalling from signal-secreting sender structures towards receptor-expressing targeted neurons located extrasynaptically, in a non-synaptic, inter-neuronal form of communication. Somatostatin controls the efficiency of central glutamate transmission by either modulating presynaptically the glutamate exocytosis or by metamodulating the activity of glutamate receptors colocalized and functionally coupled with somatostatin receptors in selected subpopulations of nerve terminals. Deciphering the role of somatostatin in the mechanisms of "volume diffusion" and in the "receptor-receptor interaction" unveils new perspectives in the central role of this fine tuner of synaptic strength, paving the road to new therapeutic approaches for the cure of central disorders.

A role for the neuropeptide somatostatin in the neurobiology of behaviors associated with substances abuse and affective disorders

In recent years, neuropeptides which display potent regulatory control of stress-related behaviors have been extensively demonstrated to play a critical role in regulating behaviors associated with substance abuse and affective disorders. Somatostatin (SST) is one neuropeptide known to significantly contribute to emotionality and stress behaviors. However, the role of SST in regulating behavior has received relatively little attention relative to other stress-involved peptides, such as neuropeptide Y or corticotrophin releasing factor. This review characterizes our current understanding of the role of SST and SST-expressing cells in general in modulating several behaviors intrinsically linked to substance abuse and affective disorders, specifically: anxiety and fear; stress and depression; feeding and drinking; and circadian rhythms. We further summarize evidence of a direct role for the SST system, and specifically somatostatin receptors 2 and 4, in substance abuse disorders. This article is part of the special issue on 'Neuropeptides'.

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms Underlying Somatostatin-Based Signaling in Two Model Neural Networks, the Retina and the Hippocampus

Neural inhibition plays a key role in determining the specific computational tasks of different brain circuitries. This functional "braking" activity is provided by inhibitory interneurons that use different neurochemicals for signaling. One of these substances, somatostatin, is found in several neural networks, raising questions about the significance of its widespread occurrence and usage. Here, we address this issue by analyzing the somatostatinergic system in two regions of the central nervous system: the retina and the hippocampus. By comparing the available information on these structures, we identify common motifs in the action of somatostatin that may explain its involvement in such diverse circuitries. The emerging concept is that somatostatin-based signaling, through conserved molecular and cellular mechanisms, allows neural networks to operate correctly.

Somatostatin Serves a Modulatory Role in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb: Neuroanatomical and Behavioral Evidence

Somatostatin (SOM) and somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-4) are present in all olfactory structures, including the olfactory bulb (OB), where SOM modulates physiological gamma rhythms and olfactory discrimination responses. In this work, histological, viral tracing and transgenic approaches were used to characterize SOM cellular targets in the murine OB. We demonstrate that SOM targets all levels of mitral dendritic processes in the OB with somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) detected in the dendrites of previously uncharacterized mitral-like cells. We show that inhibitory interneurons of the glomerular layer (GL) express SSTR4 while SSTR3 is confined to the granule cell layer (GCL). Furthermore, SOM cells in the OB receive synaptic inputs from olfactory cortical afferents. Behavioral studies demonstrate that genetic deletion of SSTR4, SSTR2 or SOM differentially affects olfactory performance. SOM or SSTR4 deletion have no major effect on olfactory behavioral performances while SSTR2 deletion impacts olfactory detection and discrimination behaviors. Altogether, these results describe novel anatomical and behavioral contributions of SOM, SSTR2 and SSTR4 receptors in olfactory processing.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature

Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin-release inhibitory factor, is a cyclopeptide that exerts potent inhibitory actions on hormone secretion and neuronal excitability. Its physiologic functions are mediated by five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) called somatostatin receptor (SST)1-5. These five receptors share common structural features and signaling mechanisms but differ in their cellular and subcellular localization and mode of regulation. SST₂ and SST₅ receptors have evolved as primary targets for pharmacological treatment of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, SST₂ is a prototypical GPCR for the development of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. This review article summarizes findings published in the last 25 years on the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications related to SSTs. We also discuss potential future developments and propose a new nomenclature.

Regulation of somatostatin receptor 2 in the context of antidepressant treatment response in chronic mild stress in rat

RATIONALE

The role of somatostatin and its receptors for the stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders has been widely raised. Recently, we have also demonstrated the involvement of somatostatin receptor type 2-sst2R and dopamine receptor type 2-D2R in stress.

OBJECTIVE

In this context, we decided to find if these receptors are involved in response to antidepressant treatment in animal model of depression-chronic mild stress (CMS).

METHODS

Here, we report data obtained following 7-week CMS procedure. The specific binding of [125I]Tyr3-Octreotide to sst2R and [3H]Domperidone to D2R was measured in the rat brain, using autoradiography. Additionally, the level of dopamine and metabolites was measured in the rat brain.

RESULTS

In the final baseline test after 7 weeks of stress, the reduced consumption of sucrose solution was observed (controls vs the stressed animals (6.25 0.16 vs. 10.39 0.41; p < 0.05). Imipramine was administered for the next 5 weeks, and it reversed anhedonia in majority of animals (imipramine-reactive); however, in some animals, it did not (imipramine-non-reactive). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant effects of stress and treatment and time interaction [F(16, 168) = 3.72; p < 0.0001], n = 10 per groups. We observed decreased binding of [125I]Tyr3-Octreotide in most of rat brain regions in imipramine non-reactive groups of animals. The decrease of D2R after stress in striatum and nucleus accumbens and no effect of imipramine were observed. In the striatum and prefrontal cortex, the significant role of stress and imipramine in dopamine levels was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained in binding assays, together with dopamine level, indicate the involvement of sst2R receptors for reaction to antidepressant treatment. Besides, the stress context itself changes the effect of antidepressant drug.

Neuropeptidergic integration of behavior in Trichoplax adhaerens, an animal without synapses

Trichoplax adhaerens is a flat, millimeter-sized marine animal that adheres to surfaces and grazes on algae. Trichoplax displays a repertoire of different feeding behaviors despite the apparent absence of a true nervous system with electrical or chemical synapses. It glides along surfaces to find food, propelled by beating cilia on cells at its ventral surface, and pauses during feeding by arresting ciliary beating. We found that when endomorphin-like peptides are applied to an animal, ciliary beating is arrested, mimicking natural feeding pauses. Antibodies against these neuropeptides label cells that express the neurosecretory proteins and voltage-gated calcium channels implicated in regulated secretion. These cells are embedded in the ventral epithelium, where they comprise only 4% of the total, and are concentrated around the edge of the animal. Each bears a cilium likely to be chemosensory and used to detect algae. Trichoplax pausing during feeding or spontaneously in the absence of food often induce their neighbors to pause as well, even neighbors not in direct contact. Pausing behavior propagates from animal to animal across distances much greater than the signal that diffuses from just one animal, so we presume that the peptides secreted from one animal elicit secretion from nearby animals. Signal amplification by peptide-induced peptide secretion explains how a small number of sensory secretory cells lacking processes and synapses can evoke a wave of peptide secretion across the entire animal to globally arrest ciliary beating and allow pausing during feeding.

Effects of the neuroprotective drugs somatostatin and brimonidine on retinal cell models of diabetic retinopathy

AIMS

Diabetic retinopathy is considered a microvascular disease, but recent evidence has underlined early involvement of the neuroretina with interactions between microvascular and neural alterations. Topical administration of somatostatin (SST), a neuroprotective molecule with antiangiogenic properties, prevents diabetes-induced retinal neurodegeneration in animals. The α₂-adrenergic receptor agonist brimonidine (BRM) decreases vitreoretinal vascular endothelial growth factor and inhibits blood-retinal barrier breakdown in diabetic rats. However, SST and BRM effects on microvascular cells have not yet been studied. We investigated the behaviour of these drugs on the crosstalk between microvasculature and neuroretina.

METHODS

Expression of SST receptors 1-5 in human retinal pericytes (HRP) was checked. We subsequently evaluated the effects of diabetic-like conditions (high glucose and/or hypoxia) with/without SST/BRM on HRP survival. Endothelial cells (EC) and photoreceptors were maintained in the above conditions and their conditioned media (CM) used to culture HRP. Vice versa, HRP-CM was used on EC and photoreceptors. Survival parameters were assessed.

RESULTS

HRP express the SST receptor 1 (SSTR1). Glucose fluctuations mimicking those occurring in diabetic subjects are more damaging for pericytes and photoreceptors than stable high glucose and hypoxic conditions. SST/BRM added to HRP in diabetic-like conditions decrease EC apoptosis. However, neither SST nor BRM changed the response of pericytes and neuroretina-vascular crosstalk under diabetic-like conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Retinal pericytes express SSTR1, indicating that they can be a target for SST. Exposure to SST/BRM had no adverse effects, direct or mediated by the neuroretina, suggesting that these molecules could be safely evaluated for the treatment of ocular diseases.

Somatostatin receptor-mediated suppression of gabaergic synaptic transmission in cultured rat retinal amacrine cells

Somatostatin (SRIF) modulates neurotransmitter release by activating the specific receptors (sst1-sst5). Our previous study showed that sst5 receptors are expressed in rat retinal GABAergic amacrine cells. Here, we investigated modulation of GABA release by SRIF in cultured amacrine cells, using patch-clamp techniques. The frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) in the amacrine cells was significantly reduced by SRIF, which was partially reversed by BIM 23056, an sst5 receptor antagonist, and was further rescued by addition of CYN-154806, an sst2 receptor antagonist. Both nimodipine, an L-type Ca2+ channel blocker, and ω-conotoxin GVIA, an N-type Ca2+ channel blocker, suppressed the sIPSC frequency, and in the presence of nimodipine and ω-conotoxin GVIA, SRIF failed to further suppress the sIPSC frequency. Extracellular application of forskolin, an activator of adenylate cyclase, increased the sIPSC frequency, while the membrane permeable protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor Rp-cAMP reduced it, and in the presence of Rp-cAMP, SRIF did not change sIPSCs. However, SRIF persisted to suppress the sIPSCs in the presence of KT5823, a protein kinase G (PKG) inhibitor. Moreover, pre-incubation with Bis IV, a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, or pre-application of xestospongin C, an inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) inhibitor, SRIF still suppressed the sIPSC frequency. All these results suggest that SRIF suppresses GABA release from the amacrine cells by inhibiting presynaptic Ca2+ channels, in part through activating sst5/sst2 receptors, a process that is mediated by the intracellular cAMP-PKA signaling pathway.

Porcine sst1 can physically interact with other somatostatin receptors, and its expression is regulated by metabolic/inflammatory sensors

The majority of the biological actions attributed to somatostatin (SST) are thought to be mediated by SST receptor 2 (sst2), the most ubiquitous sst, and, to a lesser extent, by sst5. However, a growing body of evidence suggests a relevant role of sst1 in mediating SST actions in (patho)physiological situations (i.e., endometriosis, type 2 diabetes). Moreover, sst1 together with sst2 and sst5 is involved in the well-known actions of SST on pituitary somatotropes in pig and primates. Here, we cloned the porcine sst1 (psst1) and performed a structural and functional characterization using both primary and heterologous models. The psst1 sequence presents the majority of signature motifs shared among G protein-coupled receptors and, specifically, among ssts and exhibits a high homology with other mammalian sst1, with only minor differences in the amino-terminal domain, reinforcing the idea of an early evolutive divergence between mammalian and nonmammalian sst1s. psst1 is functional in terms of decreasing cAMP levels in response to SST when transfected in heterologous models. The psst1 receptor is expressed in several tissues, and analyses of gene cis elements predict regulation by multiple transcription factors and metabolic stimuli. Finally, psst1 is coexpressed with other sst subtypes in various tissues, and in vitro data demonstrate that psst1 can interact with itself forming homodimers and with other ssts forming heterodimers. These data highlight the functional importance of sst1 on the SST-mediated effects and its functional interaction with different ssts, which point out the necessity of exploring the consequences of such interactions.

Reevaluation of sst₁ somatostatin receptor expression in human normal and neoplastic tissues using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody UMB-7

BACKGROUND

The somatostatin receptor 1 (sst1) is widely distributed throughout the body and is also present in neoplastic tissues. However, little is known about its precise tissue distribution, regulation and function, which may in part be due to the lack of specific monoclonal anti-sst1 antibodies.

METHODS

We have characterized the novel rabbit monoclonal anti-human sst1 antibody UMB-7 using sst1-expressing cells and human pituitary samples. The antibody was then used for immunohistochemical staining of a large panel of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human tissues.

RESULTS

Western blot analyses of BON-1 cells and human pituitary revealed a broad band migrating at a molecular weight of 45,000-60,000. After enzymatic deglycosylation the size of this band decreased to a molecular weight of 45,000. UMB-7 yielded an efficient immunostaining of distinct cell populations in the human tissue samples with a predominance of plasma membrane staining, which was completely abolished by preadsorption of UMB-7 with its immunizing peptide. The sst1 receptor was detected in anterior pituitary, pancreatic islets, distal tubules, enteric ganglion cells and nerve fibers, chief cells of the gastric mucosa, macrophages and mast cells. In addition, sst1 was observed in pituitary adenomas, gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors and pheochromocytoma as well as in pancreatic adenocarcinomas, gastric carcinomas, urinary bladder carcinomas and sarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

UMB-7 may prove of great value in the identification of sst1-expressing tumors during routine histopathological examinations. This may open up new routes for diagnostic and therapeutic intervention.

Somatostatinergic systems: an update on brain functions in normal and pathological aging

Somatostatin is highly expressed in mammalian brain and is involved in many brain functions such as motor activity, sleep, sensory, and cognitive processes. Five somatostatin receptors have been described: sst(1), sst(2) (A and B), sst(3), sst(4), and sst(5), all belonging to the G-protein-coupled receptor family. During the recent years, numerous studies contributed to clarify the role of somatostatin systems, especially long-range somatostatinergic interneurons, in several functions they have been previously involved in. New advances have also been made on the alterations of somatostatinergic systems in several brain diseases and on the potential therapeutic target they represent in these pathologies.

Neuropeptidomics of mouse hypothalamus after imipramine treatment reveal somatostatin as a potential mediator of antidepressant effects

Excessive activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been associated with numerous diseases, including depression, and the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine has been shown to suppress activity of the HPA axis. Central hypothalamic control of the HPA axis is complex and involves a number of neuropeptides released from multiple hypothalamic subnuclei. The present study was therefore designed to determine the effects of imipramine administration on the mouse hypothalamus using a peptidomics approach. Among the factors found to be downregulated after acute (one day) or chronic (21 days) imipramine administration were peptides derived from secretogranin 1 (chromogranin B) as well as peptides derived from cerebellin precursors. In contrast, peptides SRIF-14 and SRIF-28 (1-11) derived from somatostatin (SRIF, somatotropin release inhibiting factor) were significantly upregulated by imipramine in the hypothalamus. Because diminished SRIF levels have long been known to occur in depression, a second part of the study investigated the roles of individual SRIF receptors in mediating potential antidepressant effects. SRA880, an antagonist of the somatostatin-1 autoreceptor (sst1) which positively modulates release of endogenous SRIF, was found to synergize with imipramine in causing antidepressant-like effects in the tail suspension test. Furthermore, chronic co-administration of SRA880 and imipramine synergistically increased BDNF mRNA expression in the cerebral cortex. Application of SRIF or L054264, an sst2 receptor agonist, but not L803807, an sst4 receptor agonist, increased phosphorylation of CaMKII and GluR1 in cerebrocortical slices. Our present experiments thus provide evidence for antidepressant-induced upregulation of SRIF in the brain, and strengthen the notion that augmented SRIF expression and signaling may counter depressive-like symptoms. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Anxiety and Depression'.

Rat hippocampal somatostatin sst3 and sst4 receptors mediate anticonvulsive effects in vivo: indications of functional interactions with sst2 receptors

Somatostatin-14 (SRIF) is a potent anticonvulsant in rodent models of limbic seizures in which the hippocampus is its major site of action. However, the distribution of hippocampal sst receptors and their role in the anticonvulsant effects of SRIF remain controversial. Moreover, striking differences have been described between mice and rats. In rats, sst(2) but not sst(1) receptors play a critical role in the anticonvulsant effects of SRIF. At present, the role of rat sst(3) and sst(4) receptors in these anticonvulsive effects remains unknown. Here we demonstrate in vivo anticonvulsive actions of rat hippocampal sst(3) and sst(4) receptors. Using microdialysis and telemetry-based electroencephalographic recordings we show that intrahippocampal administration of the sst(2) agonist L-779,976 (500 nM), the sst(3) agonist L-796,778 (100 nM) or the sst(4) agonist L-803,087 (100 nM) protects rats against focal pilocarpine-induced seizures. SRIF (1 μM)-, sst(3)- and sst(4)-mediated anticonvulsive actions are reversed by the selective sst(2) receptor antagonist cyanamid 154806 (100 nM). Moreover, the selective sst(3) antagonist SST3-ODN-8 (100 nM) blocks the sst(4)-mediated anticonvulsant effect. Sst(3) antagonism does not reverse the sst(2)- or SRIF-mediated anticonvulsant effects. Our findings provide the first in vivo evidence for potent anticonvulsive properties of sst(3) and sst(4) receptors in the rat hippocampus. Nevertheless, selective sst(2) receptor antagonism prevented these sst(3)- or sst(4) receptor-mediated anticonvulsant effects, suggesting a functional cooperation with rat hippocampal sst(2) receptors.

Somatostatin-28 modulates prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response, reward processes and spontaneous locomotor activity in rats

Somatostatins have been shown to be involved in the pathophysiology of motor and affective disorders, as well as psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia. We hypothesized that in addition to motor function, somatostatin may be involved in somatosensory gating and reward processes that have been shown to be dysregulated in schizophrenia. Accordingly, we evaluated the effects of intracerebroventricular administration of somatostatin-28 on spontaneous locomotor and exploratory behavior measured in a behavioral pattern monitor, sensorimotor gating, prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex, and brain reward function (measured in a discrete trial intracranial self-stimulation procedure) in rats. Somatostatin-28 decreased spontaneous locomotor activity during the first 10 min of a 60 min testing session with no apparent changes in the exploratory activity of rats. The highest somatostatin-28 dose (10 microg/5 microl/side) induced PPI deficits with no effect on the acoustic startle response or startle response habituation. The somatostatin-induced PPI deficit was partially reversed by administration of SRA-880, a selective somatostatin 1 (sst(1)) receptor antagonist. Somatostatin-28 also induced elevations in brain reward thresholds, reflecting an anhedonic-like state. The non-peptide sst(1) receptor antagonist SRA-880 had no effect on brain reward function under baseline conditions. Altogether these findings suggest that somatostatin-28 modulates PPI and brain reward function but does not have a robust effect on spontaneous exploratory activity. Thus, increases in somatostatin transmission may represent one of the neurochemical mechanisms underlying anhedonia, one of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and sensorimotor gating deficits associated with cognitive impairments in schizophrenia patients.

Inhibition of inflammatory pain by activating B-type natriuretic peptide signal pathway in nociceptive sensory neurons

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been known to be secreted from cardiac myocytes and activate its receptor, natriuretic peptide receptor-A (NPR-A), to reduce ventricular fibrosis. However, the function of BNP/NPR-A pathway in the somatic sensory system has been unknown. In the present study, we report a novel function of BNP in pain modulation. Using microarray and immunoblot analyses, we found that BNP and NPR-A were expressed in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) of rats and upregulated after intraplantar injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). Immunohistochemistry showed that BNP was expressed in calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-containing small neurons and IB4 (isolectin B4)-positive neurons, whereas NPR-A was present in CGRP-containing neurons. Application of BNP reduced the firing frequency of small DRG neurons in the presence of glutamate through opening large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (BKCa channels). Furthermore, intrathecal injection of BNP yielded inhibitory effects on formalin-induced flinching behavior and CFA-induced thermal hyperalgesia in rats. Blockade of BNP signaling by BNP antibodies or cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) inhibitor KT5823 [(9S,10R,12R)-2,3,9,10,11,12-hexahydro-10-methoxy-2,9-dimethyl-1-oxo-9,12-epoxy-1H-diindolo[1,2,3-fg:3',2',1'-kl]pyrrolo[3,4-i][1,6]benzodiazocine-10-carboxylic acid methyl ester] impaired the recovery from CFA-induced thermal hyperalgesia. Thus, BNP negatively regulates nociceptive transmission through presynaptic receptor NPR-A, and activation of the BNP/NPR-A/PKG/BKCa channel pathway in nociceptive afferent neurons could be a potential strategy for inflammatory pain therapy.

Relative expression of mRNA for the somatostatin receptors in the caudate putamen of C57BL/6J and 129P3/J mice: strain and heroin effects

Using real time qPCR, we examined the expression of mRNAs for the five somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in the caudate putamen of male C57BL/6J and 129P3/J mice. Animals were exposed to multiple injections of heroin, or saline, in the setting of a conditioned place preference study. The relative expression levels of the five SSTR mRNAs differed between the two strains. In both strains, SSTR-1 mRNA was expressed at the highest levels and SSTR-5 at the lowest. Interestingly, in 129P3/J mice SSTR-3 mRNA was not detected in the caudate putamen. We confirmed this finding in the frontal cortex, hypothalamus, nucleus accumbens and a region containing the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area. We also found strain differences in the mRNA levels of SSTR-2 and -4. Intermittent heroin administration had a dose-dependent effect on the levels of SSTR-1 and -3 mRNAs. These results demonstrate strain differences in the expression of specific mRNAs and a heroin-induced dose-dependent elevation of SSTR-1 and -3 mRNAs in the mouse caudate putamen.

Hippocampal sst(1) receptors are autoreceptors and do not affect seizures in rats

Somatostatin-14 (SRIF-14) exerts anticonvulsive effects in several rat seizure models, generally attributed to sst(2) receptor activation. Whereas sst(1) immunoreactivity has been localized to both polymorphic interneurons and principal cells in the rat hippocampus, its potential role as an inhibitory autoreceptor or as a receptor involved in mediating anticonvulsive actions remains unknown. We showed that intrahippocampal administration of the sst(1) antagonist SRA880 (1 microM) induced a robust increase in hippocampal SST-14 levels without affecting gamma-aminobutyric acid levels in conscious rats, indicating that the sst(1) receptor acts as an inhibitory autoreceptor. SRA880 did not affect seizure severity and did not reverse the anticonvulsive action of SRIF-14 (1 microM) against pilocarpine-induced seizures, suggesting that hippocampal sst(1) receptors are not involved in the anticonvulsive effects of SRIF-14.

Functional effects of somatostatin receptor 1 activation on synaptic transmission in the mouse hippocampus

Somatostatin-14 (SRIF) co-localizes with GABA in the hippocampus and regulates neuronal excitability. A role of SRIF in the control of hippocampal activity has been proposed, although the exact contribution of each SRIF receptor (sst(1)-sst(5)) in mediating SRIF action requires some clarification. We used hippocampal slices of wild-type and sst(1) knockout (KO) mice and selective pharmacological tools to provide conclusive evidence for a role of sst(1) in mediating SRIF inhibition of synaptic transmission. With single- and double-label immunohistochemistry, we determined the distribution of sst(1) in hippocampal slices and we quantified sst(1) colocalization with SRIF. With electrophysiology, we found that sst(1) activation with CH-275 inhibited both the NMDA- and the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-mediated responses. Results from sst(1) KO slices confirmed the specificity of CH-275 effects; sst(1) activation did not affect the inhibitory transmission which was in contrast increased by sst(4) activation with L-803,087 in both wild-type and sst(1) KO slices. The AMPA-mediated responses were increased by L-803,087. Functional interaction between sst(1) and sst(4) is suggested by the finding that their combined activation prevented the CH-275-induced inhibition of AMPA transmission. The involvement of pre-synaptic mechanisms in mediating inhibitory effects of sst(1) on excitatory transmission was demonstrated by the finding that CH-275 (i) increased the paired-pulse facilitation ratio, (ii) did not influence the AMPA depolarization in the presence of tetrodotoxin, and (iii) inhibited glutamate release induced by epileptiform treatment. We conclude that SRIF control of excitatory transmission through an action at sst(1) may represent an important contribution to the regulation of hippocampal activity.

Anxiolytic and antidepressant actions of somatostatin: the role of sst2 and sst3 receptors

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Somatostatin is a cyclic polypeptide that inhibits the release of a variety of regulatory hormones (e.g., growth hormone, insulin, glucagon, and thyrotropin). Somatostatin is also widely distributed within the central nervous system (CNS), acting both as a neurotransmitter and as a neuromodulator. Recently, we showed that intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of somatostatin reduced anxiety-like and depression-like behaviors in animal models. The somatostatin receptor subtypes that are involved in these behavioral effects, however, have not been investigated. In the CNS, the neurotransmitter actions of somatostatin are mediated through five G-protein coupled receptors (sst1 to sst5).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the behavioral effects of i.c.v. microinfusions of different doses of selective agonists of each of the five somatostatin receptor subtypes. Their behavioral effects were assessed in the elevated plus-maze and the forced swim apparatus, rodent models of anxiolytic and antidepressant drug effects, respectively.

RESULTS

Anxiety-like behavior was reduced following i.c.v. infusions of a selective sst2 receptor agonist, but not after infusions of the other four receptor agonists. An antidepressant-like effect was observed following infusions of either sst2 or sst3 agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

The results add to our nascent understanding of the role of somatostatin in anxiety- and depression-like behavior and suggest a clinical role for somatostatin agonists for the simultaneous treatment of anxiety and depression, which are often comorbid.

Activation of somatostatin receptor (sst 5) protects the rat retina from AMPA-induced neurotoxicity

In a recent study, we employed an in vivo model of retinal excitotoxicity to investigate the neuroprotective effect of somatostatinergic agents. Intravitreal administration of somatostatin and sst(2) selective agonists protected the retina from (RS)-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid hydrobromide (AMPA) induced excitotoxicity. The sst(1) and sst(4) selective ligands had no effect (Kiagiadaki and Thermos, 2008). The presence of sst(5) receptors in rat retina was only recently reported (Ke and Zhong, 2007). Synthetic agonists that activate sst(2) receptors also bind with high affinity to the sst(5) subtype. In the present study the putative neuroprotective effects of sst(5) receptor activation were investigated. Adult female and male Sprague-Dawley (250-350g) rats were employed. Groups of animals received intravitreally PBS (50mM) or AMPA (42 nmol/eye) alone or in combination with L-817,818 (sst(5), 10(-5), 10(-4)M). To exclude neuroprotective effects via the activation of sst(2) receptors, L-817,818 (10(-4)M) was coinjected with the sst(2) antagonist CYN-154806 (10(-4)M). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies using the anti-retinal marker choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and TUNEL staining were employed to examine retinal cell loss and protection. IHC and Western blot analysis were also employed to assess whether the sst(5) receptors are viable in the AMPA treated tissue as compared to control retina. sst(5) receptors were not affected by AMPA. L-817,818 protected the retina from the AMPA insult in the dose of 10(-4)M, while CYN-154806 (10(-4)M) had no effect on the sst(5) neuroprotection. TUNEL staining confirmed the AMPA-induced retinal toxicity and the L-817,818 neuroprotection. These results demonstrate for the first time that sst(5) receptors are functional in the retina, and that sst(5) analogs administered intravitreally protect the retina from excitotoxicity. Further studies are essential to ascertain the therapeutic relevance of these results.

Novel, potent, and radio-iodinatable somatostatin receptor 1 (sst1) selective analogues

The proposed sst(1) pharmacophore (J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 523-533) derived from the NMR structures of a family of mono- and dicyclic undecamers was used to design octa-, hepta-, and hexamers with high affinity and selectivity for the somatostatin sst(1) receptor. These compounds were tested for their in vitro binding properties to all five somatostatin (SRIF) receptors using receptor autoradiography; those with high SRIF receptor subtype 1 (sst(1)) affinity and selectivity were shown to be agonists when tested functionally in a luciferase reporter gene assay. Des-AA(1,4-6,10,12,13)-[DTyr(2),DAgl(NMe,2naphthoyl)(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF-Thr-NH(2) (25) was radio-iodinated ((125)I-25) and specifically labeled sst(1)-expressing cells and tissues. 3D NMR structures were calculated for des-AA(1,4-6,10,12,13)-[DPhe(2),DTrp(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF-Thr-NH(2) (16), des-AA(1,2,4-6,10,12,13)-[DAgl(NMe,2naphthoyl)(8),IAmp(9)]-SRIF-Thr-NH(2) (23), and des-AA(1,2,4-6,10,12,13)-[DAgl(NMe,2naphthoyl)(8),IAmp(9),Tyr(11)]-SRIF-NH(2) (27) in DMSO. Though the analogues have the sst(1) pharmacophore residues at the previously determined distances from each other, the positioning of the aromatic residues in 16, 23, and 27 is different from that described earlier, suggesting an induced fit mechanism for sst(1) binding of these novel, less constrained sst(1)-selective family members.

GABA antagonists reverse the somatostatin dependent attenuation of rat locomotor activity

Somatostatin infusion in rat ventral pallidum (VP) led to the attenuation of locomotor activity (Marazioti, A., Kastellakis, A., Antoniou, K., Papasava, D., Thermos, K., 2005. Somatostatin receptors in the ventral pallidum/substantia innominata modulate rat locomotor activity. Psychopharmacology 181, 319-326). In the present study, we investigated the putative circuitry involved in somatostatin's actions by examining the involvement of GABAergic neurotransmission in locomotor activity subsequent to somatostatin's infusion into the VP. Male Sprague-Dawley rats, 300-350 g, were used for all experiments. Saline or somatostatin (240 ng/0.5 microl/side) in the absence or presence of bicuculline (GABA-A antagonist; 5 mg/kg/ml, i.p.; 120 ng/side nucleus accumbens (NAc)) or phaclofen (GABA-B antagonist; 10 mg/kg/ml, i.p.; 120 ng/side NAc) were infused bilaterally, and the locomotor activity measured for 60 min using a rectangular activity cage. Somatostatin infused in the VP decreased the locomotor activity of the rat in a statistically significant manner. Bicuculline (i.p., and in the NAc) and phaclofen (only i.p.) reversed SRIF's actions, when administered prior to somatostatin's infusion in the VP. The present study provides further information on somatostatin's involvement in the VP-NAc circuitry, and implicates the GABAergic system in somatostatin's actions in the VP.

Antidepressants influence somatostatin levels and receptor pharmacology in brain

This study investigated how the administration (acute and chronic) of the antidepressants citalopram and desmethylimipramine (DMI) influences somatostatin (somatotropin release inhibitory factor, SRIF) levels and SRIF receptor density (sst(1-5)) in rat brain. Animals received either of the following treatments: (1) saline for 21 days (control group), (2) saline for 20 days and citalopram or DMI for 1 day (citalopram or DMI acute groups), (3) citalopram or DMI for 21 days (citalopram or DMI chronic groups). Somatostatin levels were determined by radioimmunoassay. [(125)I]LTT SRIF-28 binding in the absence (labeling of sst(1-5)) or presence of 3 nM MK678 (labeling of sst(1/4)) and [(125)I]Tyr(3) octreotide (labeling of sst(2/5)) binding with subsequent autoradiography was performed in brains of rats treated with both antidepressants. Somatostatin levels were increased after citalopram, but not DMI administration, in the caudate-putamen, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, and prefrontal cortex. Autoradiography studies illustrated a significant decrease in receptor density in the superficial and deep layers of frontal cortex (sst(2)), as well as a significant increase in the CA1 (sst(1/4)) hippocampal field in brains of chronically citalopram-treated animals. DMI administration increased sst(1/4) receptors levels in the CA1 hippocampal region. These results suggest that citalopram and to a lesser extent DMI influence the function of the somatostatin system in brain regions involved in the emotional, motivational, and cognitive aspects of behavior.

Activation of somatostatin receptors in the globus pallidus increases rat locomotor activity and dopamine release in the striatum

RATIONALE

Somatostatin and its receptors have been localized in brain nuclei implicated in motor control, such as the striatum, nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum, and globus pallidus (GP).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the role of somatostatin receptors (sst(1,2,4)) in the GP on dopamine (DA)-mediated behaviors, such as locomotor activity, and to examine the GP-striatum circuitry by correlating the effect of somatostatin in the GP with the release of DA in the striatum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals received saline, somatostatin (60, 120, 240 ng/0.5 microl per side) or the following selective ligands: L-797,591 (sst(1) analog, 60, 120, 240 ng/0.5 microl per side), L-779,976 (sst(2) analog, 120, 240, 480 ng/0.5 microl per side), L-803,087 (sst(4) analog; 120, 240, 480 ng/0.5 microl per side), L-796,778 (sst(3) analog, 240 ng/0.5 microl per side), SRA-880 (sst(1) selective antagonist + somatostatin, 120 ng/0.5 microl per side), CYN154806 (sst(2) selective antagonist + somatostatin, 120 ng/0.5 microl per side) bilaterally in the GP of the rat. Locomotor activity was measured for 60 min. The effect of somatostatin, administered intrapallidally, on the extracellular concentrations of DA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, and homovanillic acid in the striatum was also studied in the behaving rat using in vivo microdialysis methodology.

RESULTS

Somatostatin increased the locomotor activity of the rat in a dose-dependent manner. This effect was mediated by activation of the sst(1), sst(2), and sst(4) receptors. Selective sst agonists increased locomotor activity in a statistical significant manner, while selective sst(1) and sst(2) antagonists reversed the somatostatin-mediated locomotor activity to control levels. DA levels increased in the striatum after intrapallidal infusion of somatostatin (240 ng/side).

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide behavioral and neurochemical evidence of the functional role of somatostatin receptors in the GP-striatum circuitry.

Somatostatin increases rat locomotor activity by activating sst(2) and sst (4) receptors in the striatum and via glutamatergic involvement

The involvement of striatal somatostatin receptors (sst(1), sst(2) and sst(4)) in locomotor activity was investigated. Male Sprague-Dawley rats, 280-350 g, received in the striatum bilateral infusions of saline, somatostatin, and selective sst(1), sst(2), and sst(4) ligands. Spontaneous locomotor activity was recorded for 60 min. The involvement of excitatory amino acid receptors (AMPA and NMDA) on somatostatin's actions was also examined. Western blot analysis was employed for the identification of somatostatin receptors in striatal membranes. Somatostatin, sst(2) and sst(4), but not sst(1), selective ligands increased rat locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner. Blockade of AMPA and NMDA receptors reversed somatostatin's actions. In conclusion, striatal somatostatin receptor activation differentially influence rat locomotor activity, while glutamatergic actions underlie the behavioral actions of somatostatin.

Somatostatinergic systems in brain: networks and functions

Somatostatin is abundantly expressed in mammalian brain. The peptide binds with high affinity to six somatostatin receptors, sst1, sst2A and B, sst3 to 5, all belonging to the G-protein-coupled receptor family. Recent advances in the neuroanatomy of somatostatin neurons and cellular distribution of sst receptors shed light on their functional roles in the neuronal network. Beside their initially described neuroendocrine role, somatostatin systems subserve neuromodulatory roles in the brain, influencing motor activity, sleep, sensory processes and cognitive functions, and are altered in brain diseases like affective disorders, epilepsia and Alzheimer's disease.

Physiology and pathology of somatostatin in the mammalian retina: a current view

In the retina, peptidergic signalling participates in multiple circuits of visual information processing. The neuropeptide somatostatin (SRIF) is localised to amacrine cells and, in some instances, in a subset of ganglion cells. The variegated expression patterns of SRIF receptors (sst(1)-sst(5)) and the variety of signalling mechanisms activated by retinal SRIF suggest that this peptide may exert multiple actions on retinal neurons and on retinal physiology, although our current understanding reflects a rather complicated picture. SRIF, mostly through sst(2), may act as a positive factor in the retina by regulating retinal homeostasis and protecting neurons against damage. In this respect, SRIF analogues seem to constitute a promising therapeutic arsenal to cure different retinal diseases, as for instance, ischemic and diabetic retinopathies. However, further investigations are needed not only to fully understand the functional role of the SRIF system in the retina but also to exploit new chemical space for drug-like molecules.

Novel signals mediating the functions of somatostatin: the emerging role of NO/cGMP

The neuropeptide somatostatin is a cyclic tetradecapeptide, which is widely distributed in the peripheral and central nervous system. It mediates a plethora of physiological actions and functions as a neurotransmitter, neuromodulator or trophic factor. Somatostatin activates six receptor subtypes that are expressed differentially in different tissues and are coupled to diverse signalling pathways. In order to elucidate the functional role of the individual receptor subtypes, many investigations focused on the assignment of each receptor to a particular signalling pathway. Signalling pathways involving enzyme (adenylate cyclase, phospholipases, phosphatases) and ion channel systems in native and recombinant receptor systems have been extensively studied. A one to one situation (receptor/pathway) has yet to be established, thus justifying the diverse actions of somatostatin. Recently, a NO/cGMP pathway has been shown to mediate the functions of somatostatin and its receptors. This review will present the findings that support the emerging role of NO/cGMP as a novel signal in SRIF's actions in retinal physiology and somatotroph release.

Identification and SAR of potent and selective non-peptide obeline somatostatin sst1 receptor antagonists

A novel class of non-peptide somatostatin receptor ligands bearing the octahydrobenzo[g]quinoline (obeline) structural element has been identified. SAR studies have been performed that led to the discovery of derivatives with high affinity (pK(d) r sst(1) > or = 9) and selectivity (> or = 150-fold for h sst(1) over h sst(2)-h sst(5)) for somatostatin receptor subtype sst(1). In a functional assay, the compounds act as antagonists at human recombinant sst(1) receptors.

Expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 5 in rat retinal amacrine cells

Somatostatin (SRIF), as a neuroactive peptide in the CNS, exerts its actions via five subtypes of specific receptors (ssts). In this work, the localization of sst(5) was studied immunocytochemically in rat retinal amacrine cells (ACs). Labeling for sst(5) was diffusely distributed throughout the full thickness of the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and formed two distinct fluorescence bands in the distal part of the IPL. Double labeling experiments showed that sst(5) was expressed in GABAergic ACs. It was further shown that labeling for sst(5) was observed in both dopaminergic and cholinergic ACs, stained by tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), respectively. The immunostaining appeared mainly on the cell membranes and somatodendritic compartments of these ACs. For the cholinergic ACs, weak sst(5)-immunoreactivity was also observed in the processes terminating in the IPL. In contrast, no sst(5)-immunoreactivity was found in glycinergic AII ACs, stained by parvalbumin (PV). Furthermore, labeling for SRIF was co-localized with sst(5) in both dopaminergic and cholinergic ACs. These results suggest that sst(5) may serve as an autoreceptor or conventional receptor in retinal ACs.

Compensatory changes in the hippocampus of somatostatin knockout mice: upregulation of somatostatin receptor 2 and its function in the control of bursting activity and synaptic transmission

Somatostatin-14 (SRIF) co-localizes with gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the hippocampus and regulates neuronal excitability. A role of SRIF in the control of seizures has been proposed, although its exact contribution requires some clarification. In particular, SRIF knockout (KO) mice do not exhibit spontaneous seizures, indicating that compensatory changes may occur in KO. In the KO hippocampus, we examined whether specific SRIF receptors and/or the cognate peptide cortistatin-14 (CST) compensate for the absence of SRIF. We found increased levels of both sst2 receptors (sst2) and CST, and we explored the functional consequences of sst2 compensation on bursting activity and synaptic responses in hippocampal slices. Bursting was decreased by SRIF in wild-type (WT) mice, but it was not affected by either CST or sst2 agonist and antagonist. sst4 agonist increased bursting frequency in either WT or KO. In WT, but not in KO, its effects were blocked by agonizing or antagonizing sst2, suggesting that sst2 and sst4 are functionally coupled in the WT hippocampus. Bursting was reduced in KO as compared with WT and was increased upon application of sst2 antagonist, while SRIF, CST and sst2 agonist had no effect. At the synaptic level, we observed that in WT, SRIF decreased excitatory postsynaptic potentials which were, in contrast, increased by sst2 antagonist in KO. We conclude that sst2 compensates for SRIF absence and that its upregulation is responsible for reduced bursting and decreased excitatory transmission in KO mice. We suggest that a critical density of sst2 is needed to control hippocampal activity.