Towards therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus in cancer? Results of an exploratory study of exposure-effect relationship

Everolimus Personalized Therapy: Second Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology

ABSTRACT

The Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology established the second consensus report to guide Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of everolimus (EVR) and its optimal use in clinical practice 7 years after the first version was published in 2016. This version provides information focused on new developments that have arisen in the last 7 years. For the general aspects of the pharmacology and TDM of EVR that have retained their relevance, readers can refer to the 2016 document. This edition includes new evidence from the literature, focusing on the topics updated during the last 7 years, including indirect pharmacological effects of EVR on the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 with the major mechanism of direct inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1. In addition, various concepts and technical options to monitor EVR concentrations, improve analytical performance, and increase the number of options available for immunochemical analytical methods have been included. Only limited new pharmacogenetic information regarding EVR has emerged; however, pharmacometrics and model-informed precision dosing have been constructed using physiological parameters as covariates, including pharmacogenetic information. In clinical settings, EVR is combined with a decreased dose of calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine, instead of mycophenolic acid. The literature and recommendations for specific organ transplantations, such as that of the kidneys, liver, heart, and lungs, as well as for oncology and pediatrics have been updated. EVR TDM for pancreatic and islet transplantation has been added to this edition. The pharmacodynamic monitoring of EVR in organ transplantation has also been updated. These updates and additions, along with the previous version of this consensus document, will be helpful to clinicians and researchers treating patients receiving EVR.

Everolimus decreases [U-13C]glucose utilization by pyruvate carboxylase in breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo

Reprogrammed metabolism is a hallmark of cancer, but notoriously difficult to target due to metabolic plasticity, especially in response to single metabolic interventions. Combining mTOR inhibitor everolimus and mitochondrial complex 1 inhibitor metformin results in metabolic synergy in in vitro models of triple-negative breast cancer. Here, we investigated whether the effect of this drug combination on tumor size is reflected in changes in tumor metabolism using [U-13C]glucose labeling in an MDA-MB-231 triple negative breast cancer xenograft model. The in vitro effects of everolimus and metformin treatment on oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis reflected changes in 13C-labeling of metabolites in MDA-MB-231 cells. Treatment of MDA-MB-231 xenografts in SCID/Beige mice with everolimus resulted in slower tumor growth and reduced tumor size and tumor viability by 35%. Metformin treatment moderately inhibited tumor growth but did not enhance everolimus-induced effects. High serum levels of everolimus were reached, whereas levels of metformin were relatively low. Everolimus decreased TCA cycle metabolite labeling and inhibited pyruvate carboxylase activity. Metformin only caused a mild reduction in glycolytic metabolite labeling and did not affect pyruvate carboxylase activity or TCA cycle metabolite labeling. In conclusion, treatment with everolimus, but not metformin, decreased tumor size and viability. Furthermore, the efficacy of everolimus was reflected in reduced 13C-labeling of TCA cycle intermediates and reduced pyruvate carboxylase activity. By using in-depth analysis of drug-induced changes in glucose metabolism in combination with measurement of drug levels in tumor and plasma, effects of metabolically targeted drugs can be explained, and novel targets can be identified.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Kinase Inhibitors in Oncology

Although kinase inhibitors (KI) frequently portray large interpatient variability, a 'one size fits all' regimen is still often used. In the meantime, relationships between exposure-response and exposure-toxicity have been established for several KIs, so this regimen could lead to unnecessary toxicity and suboptimal efficacy. Dose adjustments based on measured systemic pharmacokinetic levels-i.e., therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-could therefore improve treatment efficacy and reduce the incidence of toxicities. Therefore, the aim of this comprehensive review is to give an overview of the available evidence for TDM for the 77 FDA/EMA kinase inhibitors currently approved (as of July 1st, 2023) used in hematology and oncology. We elaborate on exposure-response and exposure-toxicity relationships for these kinase inhibitors and provide practical recommendations for TDM and discuss corresponding pharmacokinetic targets when possible.

Evaluation of Everolimus Activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Using In Vitro Models of Infection

Even though Everolimus has been investigated in a phase II randomized trial as a host-directed therapy (HDT) to treat tuberculosis (TB), an oncological patient treated with Everolimus for a neuroendocrine pancreatic neoplasia developed active TB twice and a non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infection in a year and a half time span. To investigate this interesting case, we isolated and genotypically characterized the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) clinical strain from the patient and tested the effect of Everolimus on its viability in an axenic culture and in a peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMCs) infection model. To exclude strain-specific resistance, we tested the activity of Everolimus against Mtb strains of ancient and modern lineages. Furthermore, we investigated the Everolimus effect on ROS production and autophagy modulation during Mtb infection. Everolimus did not have a direct effect on mycobacteria viability and a negligible effect during Mtb infection in host cells, although it stimulated autophagy and ROS production. Despite being a biologically plausible HDT against TB, Everolimus does not exert a direct or indirect activity on Mtb. This case underlines the need for a careful approach to drug repurposing and implementation and the importance of pre-clinical experimental studies.

Everolimus pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship in Japanese patients with advanced breast cancer

Background: Everolimus is one of the key drugs for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. The optimal target concentration range for everolimus therapy in patients with breast cancer has not yet been established. This study aimed to characterize everolimus pharmacokinetics (PK) and determine the relationship between blood concentration and efficacy as well as adverse events in patients with breast cancer.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational PK study. Patients receiving everolimus between November 2015 and November 2018 at our hospital were enrolled in this study. The whole blood samples for the everolimus assay were collected at least two weeks after initiation of treatment or the last everolimus dose change. PK parameters were estimated using Bayesian analysis. Statistical differences in everolimus trough concentrations between patient cohorts were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. Progression-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled in the study. The median follow-up period was 35 months. The most frequently observed adverse event was stomatitis (all grade 94%). There was high inter-individual variation in PK parameters such as clearance [range: 5.1–21.3 L/h/70 kg and co-efficient of variation (CV): 38.5%] and volume of distribution of the central compartment (range: 9.9–103.6 L/70 kg and CV: 57.8%). The trough concentrations at dose-limiting toxicities were significantly higher than trough concentrations in the absence of these toxicities (p = 0.0058). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the 10–20 ng/ml group than in the other groups (p = 0.0078).

Conclusion: This study characterized the everolimus PK parameters in Japanese patients with breast cancer. High everolimus exposure was found to be associated with poor tolerability. Based on our data, trough concentrations in the range of 10–20 ng/ml may be associated with prolonged progression-free survival. Thus, determining the blood concentration of everolimus and subsequent dose adjustments will potentially reduce side effects and enhance the therapeutic effect in Japanese patients with advanced breast cancer.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Protein Kinase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Patients

Protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) represent up-to-date therapeutic approach in breast cancer treatment. Although cancer is a rapidly progressive disease, many substances, including PKIs, are usually used at fixed doses without regard to each patient's individuality. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a tool that allows individualization of therapy based on drug plasma levels. For TDM conduct, exposure-response relationships of drug substances are required. The pharmacokinetic data and exposure-response evidence supporting the use of TDM for 6 PKIs used in breast cancer treatment, one of the most common female tumour diseases, are discussed in this review.

Real-world pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in metastatic breast cancer

Purpose This study investigated the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of everolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in real-world practice.Methods Twenty-two patients with mBC treated with everolimus plus exemestane were enrolled. Blood everolimus concentrations were measured at outpatient visits. The inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was examined. The efficacy and safety endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and the cumulative incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), respectively. Results Blood samples were obtained from 19 consenting patients. Everolimus did not completely inhibit mTOR activity in PBMCs at therapeutic concentrations (~ 56 % maximal inhibition). The most common adverse event was stomatitis (any grade 77 %). The trough concentration (Ctrough) was significantly higher in patients experiencing DLTs than in those without any DLTs (P = 0.030). The optimal Ctrough cutoff predicting DLT development was 17.3 ng/mL. The cumulative incidence of DLTs was significantly higher in patients with Ctrough ≥17.3 ng/mL than in other patients (sub-hazard ratio 4.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.53-15.5; P = 0.007). Furthermore, the median PFS was numerically longer in patients who maintained a steady-state Ctrough below the threshold than in those who did not (327 days [95 % CI 103-355 days] vs. 194 days [95 % CI 45 days-not estimable]; P = 0.35). Conclusions The suggested upper threshold for the therapeutic window of everolimus Ctrough was 17.3 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing may improve the efficacy and safety of everolimus for mBC, warranting further investigation in a larger study.Clinical trial registry: Not applicable.

High trough levels of everolimus combined to sorafenib improve patients survival after hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in liver transplant recipients

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following liver transplantation (LT) occurs in 10%-20% of patients transplanted for HCC. The treatment of HCC recurrence after LT remains a challenge. Consecutive patients who underwent LT for HCC between 2005 and 2015 at our center were recruited. Characteristics of patients with recurrence, modalities of treatment and outcome were collected retrospectively. Patient survival was analyzed according to HCC recurrence therapeutic strategy. Among 306 transplanted patients, 43 patients (14.1%) developed recurrence with a median survival time after recurrence of 10.9 months (95%CI: 6.6-18.6). Survival of patients treated with Sorafenib (SOR) and everolimus (EVL) (n = 19) was significantly better than that of the group treated with other strategies (n = 24) (P = 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that SOR plus EVL therapy and absence of dissemination at diagnosis of recurrence were independent predictive factors of prolonged survival after recurrence. Among the patients who treated with EVL, survival of patients with controlled EVL blood trough levels ≥5 ng/ml was significantly better compared to those with EVL trough levels <5 ng/ml (P = 0.021). Combination therapy of sorafenib and everolimus was an independent predictor for better survival after HCC recurrence. Patients with controlled everolimus trough level ≥5 ng/ml might get the best survival benefit.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs

PURPOSE

This review provides an overview of the current challenges in oral targeted antineoplastic drug (OAD) dosing and outlines the unexploited value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Factors influencing the pharmacokinetic exposure in OAD therapy are depicted together with an overview of different TDM approaches. Finally, current evidence for TDM for all approved OADs is reviewed.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search (covering literature published until April 2020), including primary and secondary scientific literature on pharmacokinetics and dose individualisation strategies for OADs, together with US FDA Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Reviews and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use European Public Assessment Reports was conducted.

RESULTS

OADs are highly potent drugs, which have substantially changed treatment options for cancer patients. Nevertheless, high pharmacokinetic variability and low treatment adherence are risk factors for treatment failure. TDM is a powerful tool to individualise drug dosing, ensure drug concentrations within the therapeutic window and increase treatment success rates. After reviewing the literature for 71 approved OADs, we show that exposure-response and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been established for the majority. Moreover, TDM has been proven to be feasible for individualised dosing of abiraterone, everolimus, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and tamoxifen in prospective studies. There is a lack of experience in how to best implement TDM as part of clinical routine in OAD cancer therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sub-therapeutic concentrations and severe adverse events are current challenges in OAD treatment, which can both be addressed by the application of TDM-guided dosing, ensuring concentrations within the therapeutic window.

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Everolimus: External Validation in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The immunosuppressant everolimus is increasingly applied in renal transplantation. Its extensive pharmacokinetic variability necessitates therapeutic drug monitoring, typically based on whole-blood trough concentrations (C₀). Unfortunately, therapeutic drug monitoring target attainment rates are often unsatisfactory and patients with on-target exposure may still develop organ rejection. As everolimus displays erythrocyte partitioning, haematocrit-normalised whole-blood exposure has been suggested as a more informative therapeutic drug monitoring marker. Furthermore, model-informed precision dosing has introduced options for more sophisticated dose adaptation. We have previously developed a mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model, which described everolimus plasma pharmacokinetics and enabled estimation of haematocrit-normalised whole-blood exposure. Here, we externally evaluated this model for its utility for model-informed precision dosing.

METHODS

The retrospective dataset included 4123 pharmacokinetic observations from routine clinical therapeutic drug monitoring in 173 renal transplant recipients. Model appropriateness was confirmed with a visual predictive check. A fit-for-purpose analysis was conducted to evaluate whether the model accurately and precisely predicted a future C₀ or area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from prior pharmacokinetic observations. Bias and imprecision were expressed as the mean percentage prediction error (MPPE) and mean absolute percentage prediction error (MAPE), stratified on 6 months post-transplant. Additionally, we compared dose adaptation recommendations of conventional C₀-based therapeutic drug monitoring and C₀- or AUC-based model-informed precision dosing, and assessed the percentage of differences between observed and haematocrit-normalised C₀ (∆C₀) and AUC (∆AUC) exceeding ± 20%.

RESULTS

The model showed adequate accuracy and precision for C₀ and AUC prediction at ≤ 6 months (MPPE_C0: 8.1 ± 2.5%, MAPE_C0: 26.8 ± 2.1%; MPPE_AUC: - 9.7 ± 5.1%, MAPE_AUC: 13.3 ± 3.9%) and > 6 months post-transplant (MPPE_C0: 4.7 ± 2.0%, MAPE_C0: 25.4 ± 1.4%; MPPE_AUC: - 0.13 ± 4.8%, MAPE_AUC: 13.3 ± 2.8%). On average, dose adaptation recommendations derived from C₀-based and AUC-based model-informed precision dosing were 2.91 ± 0.01% and 13.7 ± 0.18% lower than for conventional C₀-based therapeutic drug monitoring at ≤ 6 months, and 0.93 ± 0.01% and 3.14 ± 0.04% lower at > 6 months post-transplant. The ∆C₀ and ∆AUC exceeded ± 20% on 13.6% and 14.3% of occasions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that our population pharmacokinetic model was able to accurately and precisely predict future everolimus exposure from prior pharmacokinetic measurements. In addition, we illustrated the potential added value of performing everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring with haematocrit-normalised whole-blood concentrations. Our results provide reassurance to implement this methodology in clinical practice for further evaluation.

Prospective evaluation of an anti-cancer drugs management programme in a dedicated oral therapy center (DICTO programme)

Oral therapies have highly modified cancer patient management and changed hospital practises. We introduce a specific Oral Therapy Centre and retrospectively review information prospectively recorded by co-ordination nurses (CNs) (the DICTO programme). We describe the roles played by CNs in the management of oral cancer therapies at Limoges Dupuytren Hospital between May 2015 and June 2018. All cancers, irrespective of stage or whether oral general chemotherapy or targeted therapy was prescribed, are included. We followed up 287 patients of median age 67 years (range 26–89 years). Of these, 76% had metastases and 44% were on first-line therapy. The vast majority (88%) of their first CN contacts occurred just after physician consultation and lasted an average of 60 min. As part of follow-up, the CNs made 2719 calls (average 10 min) to patients to educate them and to verify compliance and drug tolerance. They also received 833 calls from patients (70%) or their relatives or health professionals (30%) seeking advice on management of side effects. In addition to the initial appointments, 1069 non-scheduled follow-up visits were made to assess side effects (49.2%). The CNs devoted 5 h to each patient over 3 months of treatment (i.e. 25 min/day) and, also organised scheduled hospitalisations in the department of oncology for 51% of patients. We show the interest and real-life work in a specific oral therapy centre within oncology department with the role of CNs to facilitate the global health care of the patients.

Lack of everolimus diffusion in pleural fluid during pleural progression of breast cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

We report here a case where no everolimus pleural diffusion was evidenced at the same time of pleural progression of a metastatic breast cancer treated with everolimus and exemestane.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 69-year-old woman was diagnosed in October 2006 with stage III invasive ductal breast adenocarcinoma. After nine months of everolimus and exemestane treatment, she presented with a pleural progression. Everolimus concentration was measured in blood and in pleural fluid. Residual blood concentration was at 9.1 ng/mL, while no everolimus was observed in the pleural fluid.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Due to inefficacy of everolimus in this patient, she was switched to palbociclib and fulvestrant.

CONCLUSION

Everolimus seems to have a poor diffusion in the pleural fluid.

Advantages of everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology when drug-drug interaction is suspected: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Drug interactions involving everolimus are fairly well known because of its common use, primarily as an immunosuppressant. Several recommendations regarding therapeutic drug monitoring are also available for the use of everolimus-based immunosuppression regimens. However, everolimus use in oncology differs substantially, particularly because of the high doses involved. Therapeutic drug monitoring, although sometimes necessary, is not recommended as a routine in oncology. Thus, it was deemed inapplicable due to the lack of clear recommendations.

CASE REPORT

Here, we present a case where a patient was prescribed everolimus for renal cell carcinoma. The patient benefitted from a pharmaceutical consultation prior to treatment initiation, and a drug interaction with verapamil was suspected.Management and outcome: Therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus was proposed. Based on the everolimus values reported in the literature, trough plasma concentration in the patient was greatly increased. The patient was then diagnosed with grade 4 oral mucositis, thereby requiring temporary suspension of everolimus treatment. Management of adverse effects was performed through multiple medicated mouthwashes.

DISCUSSION

Therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus is important for potential drug interactions or the occurrence of severe adverse events. In such cases, dose adjustments should be managed according to everolimus plasma concentrations. Clear oncological recommendations regarding plasma everolimus thresholds are required for a successful follow-up of the patient's condition and to ensure adequate response to treatment.

Effect of genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and m-TOR on everolimus blood exposure and clinical outcomes in cancer patients

Genetic variations in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and m-TOR could contribute to interpatient variability regarding m-TOR inhibitors pharmacokinetics or cellular effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of selected candidate variations in these genes on everolimus pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity in cancer patients. Thirty-four patients receiving everolimus for breast (n = 22) or renal (n = 10) cancers, or neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin (n = 2) were included in the study. Six variants in genes related to everolimus pharmacokinetics (CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3) or pharmacodynamics (m-TOR rs2295079, rs2295080, rs2024627 and rs1057079) were genotyped. Associations with trough concentrations (C₀), dose reductions, or treatment interruptions due to toxicity and progression-free survival were investigated using generalized estimating equations and Cox models. CYP3A5 nonexpressers had significantly higher C₀ as compared with expressers (βGG vs AG = + 6.32 ± 2.22 ng/mL, p = 0.004). m-TOR rs2024627 was significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer progression studied alone or as part of an haplotype (T vs C: HR = 2.60, 95% CI [1.16-5.80], p = 0.020; CTCG vs other haplotypes HR = 2.29, 95% CI [1.06-4.95], p = 0.035, respectively). This study showed that CYP3A5 expression impacts everolimus pharmacokinetics in cancer patients and identified a genetic variation in m-TOR associated with the risk of cancer progression.

Everolimus Exposure and Early Metabolic Response as Predictors of Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Everolimus and Exemestane

BACKGROUND

Treating breast cancer patients with everolimus and exemestane can be challenging due to toxicity and suboptimal treatment responses.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether everolimus exposure and early metabolic response are predictors for toxicity and effectiveness in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed pharmacokinetic assessments 14 and 35 days after starting treatment. [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) was performed at baseline, and 14 and 35 days after the start of the therapy. We recorded toxicity, defined as dose interventions within 3 months, and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Among 44 evaluable patients, the geometric mean (GM) C_trough was higher in patients with toxicity compared to patients without (17.4 versus 12.3 μg/L (p = 0.02)). The optimal cut-off value to predict toxicity was C_trough > 19.2 μg/L. GM C_trough of patients with and without progressive disease (PD) within 3 months was not significantly different (12.0 versus 15.2 μg/L (p = 0.118)). In 28 evaluable patients, PD within 3 months could best be predicted using the percentage decrease in peak standardized uptake value normalized by lean body mass of the lesion with highest FDG uptake (SUL_{peak high}) at day 14. Patients with <11% versus >11% decrease in SUL_{peak high} at day 14 had a median PFS of 90 days versus 411 days, respectively (p = 0.0013) and more frequently had PD within 3 months: 70 vs 11%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that everolimus toxicity is related to everolimus C_trough. No relation was observed between everolimus exposure and treatment effectiveness. An early FDG-PET can identify patients at high risk of nonresponse. These results warrant further validation. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01948960.

Everolimus Exposure as a Predictor of Toxicity in Renal Cell Cancer Patients in the Adjuvant Setting: Results of a Pharmacokinetic Analysis for SWOG S0931 (EVEREST), a Phase III Study (NCT01120249)

Background:

S0931 is assessing recurrence-free survival in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients randomized to receive everolimus (EVE) versus placebo for one year following nephrectomy. Due to a higher than expected dropout rate, we assessed EVE trough levels in the adjuvant setting to evaluate the relationship between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity.

Methods:

Patients received 10 mg daily EVE for nine 6-week cycles. Pre-dose whole blood samples were collected pre-cycle 2 and pre-cycle 3 and analyzed for EVE. Patients with pre-cycle 2 and/or pre-cycle 3 EVE results were used in the analysis. Patients were segregated into quartiles (Q) based on EVE levels and logistic regression was used to model the most common adverse event outcomes using EVE trough as a predictor. Hazard and odds ratios were adjusted for age, BMI and performance status.

Results:

A total of 467 patients were included in this analysis. Quartiles normalized to an EVE dose of 10 mg/day were < 9.0, 9.0–12.9, 12.9–22.8, and > 22.8 ng/mL, respectively. EVE trough levels increased with increasing age (p < 0.001). Furthermore, EVE trough levels were higher in men than women (19.4 versus 15.4 ng/mL, p = 0.01). Risk of grade 2 + triglycerides was increased in Q2 and Q3 vs Q1 (OR = 2.08; p = 0.02 and OR = 2.63; p = 0.002). Risk of grade 2 + rash was increased in Q2 and Q4 vs Q1 (OR = 2.99; p = 0.01 and OR = 2.90; p = 0.02). There was also an increased risk of any grade 3 + tox in Q2 vs Q1 (OR = 1.71; p = 0.05).

Conclusions:

We identified significant gender and age-related differences in EVE trough levels in patients receiving adjuvant treatment for RCC. Furthermore, our analysis identified significant associations between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity.

Prospective Study of Drug-induced Interstitial Lung Disease in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Everolimus Plus Exemestane

BACKGROUND

Everolimus-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) (also: pneumonitis) poses a difficulty for physicians, as it is hard to discriminate ILD from other causes of respiratory symptoms and to decide on safe treatment continuation.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the capability of pulmonary function tests (PFT), plasma biomarkers, everolimus pharmacokinetics, and FDG-PET to discriminate between everolimus-related ILD and other causes of respiratory problems and to predict the severity of ILD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women starting treatment with everolimus plus exemestane for advanced breast cancer were included. At baseline and during the first 3 months, respiratory symptoms, PFT with diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide corrected for hemoglobin (DLCOc) and forced vital capacity, serum plasma biomarkers (including SP-D and YKL-40), everolimus trough concentration, and 18F-FDG-PET were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (out of 29 included) patients were evaluable for analysis. Fifteen patients (56%) developed everolimus-related respiratory signs or symptoms and four patients (15%) needed everolimus discontinuation and received corticosteroids. Change in DLCOc differentiated ILD from alternative diagnoses with 0.91 sensitivity and 0.78 specificity. Decrease in DLCOc (non-significant) was greatest in patients who needed everolimus discontinuation. Serum SP-D and YKL-40 could differentiate ILD from alternative diagnoses with 0.83 and 0.83 sensitivity, and 0.85 and 0.62 specificity, respectively. 18F-FDG-PET abnormalities did not precede clinical symptoms. No relationship between ILD and everolimus trough concentration was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that everolimus-related ILD occurs frequently. Prospective monitoring of DLCOc in combination with measurement of serum SP-D and YKL-40 appear useful to discriminate ILD from other causes of respiratory symptoms. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01978171.

Long-term relationship between everolimus blood concentration and clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study

Background

Everolimus is an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Recently, personalized medicine through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended in cancer therapy. In this study, the relationship between everolimus blood concentration and clinical outcomes on a long-term were evaluated in Japanese patients with mRCC.

Methods

Patients with mRCC were enrolled following treatment with everolimus at Tohoku University Hospital between April 2012 and December 2016. The relationship between everolimus trough blood concentration on day 8 of everolimus therapy and just before discontinuation or dose reduction, and their adverse events were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups based on the median of everolimus blood concentration on day 8 of treatment, and the profiles of adverse events, and efficacy [time to treatment failure (TTF) and progression-free survival (PFS)] were evaluated.

Results

The median (range) everolimus blood concentrations on day 8 after starting everolimus administration and just before discontinuation or dose reduction were 15.3 (8.1-28.0) ng/mL and 14.8 (6.4-58.4) ng/mL, respectively, with no significant difference between these values (P = 0.3594). Patients (n = 6) with discontinuation or dose reduction following adverse events in everolimus therapy had significantly higher blood concentrations than patients (n = 4) with dose maintenance on both day 8 (median, 18.0 vs 8.2 ng/mL; P = 0.0139) and just before discontinuation or dose reduction (median, 22.9 vs 9.7 ng/mL; P = 0.0142). Median TTF and PFS of the total patients (n = 10) were 96 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 26-288) and 235 days (95% CI, 28-291), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that TTF of the patients with > 15.3 ng/mL (n = 5) was not significantly different from that of the patients with ≤15.3 ng/mL (n = 5; P = 0.5622). Similarly, PFS of the patients with > 15.3 ng/mL was not significantly different from that of the patients with ≤15.3 ng/mL (P = 0.3436).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the long-term relationship between everolimus blood level and clinical outcomes and adverse events in Japanese patients with mRCC. Thus, TDM in everolimus therapy could be a useful tool for the early prediction of adverse events for Japanese patients with mRCC.

A pharmacological rationale for improved everolimus dosing in oncology and transplant patients

AIMS

Everolimus is a drug from the class of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors used for both immunosuppressant and oncological indications. We postulate that there is room for improvement of dosing, as the optimal immunosuppressive dose in calcineurin-free regimens is unknown and since the once daily dosing regimen for oncological indications is often associated with treatment-limiting toxicity.

METHODS

We developed a mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model for everolimus in cancer and transplant patients and explored alternative dosing regimens.

RESULTS

We found that formulation did not influence bioavailability and that use of >20 mg prednisolone daily increased everolimus clearance. In transplant patients, the approved dose of 0.75-1 mg twice daily (BID) results in subtherapeutic trough levels (<6 μg l-1 ) and that a higher starting dose of 2.25-3 mg BID is required.

CONCLUSION

For oncological indications, our results encourage the investigation of dosing everolimus 3.75 mg BID in terms of superiority in safety and noninferiority in efficacy.

Everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: efficacy, side-effects, resistance, and factors affecting its place in the treatment sequence

INTRODUCTION

Since the initial approval of everolimus in 2011, there have been a number of important changes in therapeutic/diagnostic modalities as well as classification/staging systems of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which can significantly impact the use of everolimus in patients with advanced NETs. Areas covered: The efficacy of everolimus monotherapy and combination therapy demonstrated in clinical studies involving patients with advanced NETs are reviewed. Several factors affecting everolimus use are described including: the development and routine use of NET classification/staging systems; widespread use of molecular imaging modalities; side effects; drug resistance; and the availability of other treatment options. Furthermore, the current position of everolimus in the treatment approach is discussed, taking into account the recommendations from the recent guidelines. Expert opinion: Although everolimus demonstrated its high efficacy and tolerability in the RADIANT trials and other clinical studies, there still remain a number of controversies related to everolimus treatment in the management of NETs. The synergistic anti-growth effect of other agents in combination with everolimus or its effect on overall survival have not been established. The appropriate order of the use of everolimus in the treatment of advanced NETs still remains unclear, which needs to be defined in further studies and will be addressed in the new guidelines.

Pharmacokinetically-targeted dosed everolimus maintenance therapy in lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND

Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, is active in refractory lymphomas. However, toxicity with flat dosing limits its usage. Speculatively, pharmacokinetically-targeted dosing could improve tolerability. Therefore, we studied serum-trough dosing with rituximab as maintenance after high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC) consolidation in lymphoma patients.

PATIENTS/METHODS

After HDC, everolimus was dosed to serum trough levels (goal 3-15 ng/mL), with quarterly rituximab infusions for 1 year while maintaining < grade II non-hematologic and < grade III hematologic toxicities. Adult patients in first PR/CR with: mantle cell, transformed, double-hit, or high risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia or in second PR for any relapsed B cell lymphoma were eligible. Prophylaxis was given for encapsulated organisms, HSV and PCP. Serum IgG levels were maintained > 500 mg/dL.

RESULTS

49 patients, median age: 59.0 years enrolled; MCL (26), CLL (10), transformed lymphoma (7), and other histologies (6). During the life of the study, the most frequent everolimus dosing has been 2.5 mg daily or 2.5 mg every other day; at these doses, serum levels are within the therapeutic range and non-hematologic toxicity is rare. At a median follow-up of 27.1 months, three patients remain on active therapy. Two patients withdrew secondary to potentially-attributable adverse events including a bacterial pneumonia and a viral pneumonia; this low rate of discontinuation compares well to other long-term everolimus trials. While a 58 and 76% EFS at 30 months for the entire cohort and MCL cohort, respectively, compares similarly to previously published HDC/rituximab data, longer follow-up is required.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetically-targeted dosing appears to increase everolimus tolerability. This finding may be applicable to other patient populations.

Clinical validation study of dried blood spot for determining everolimus concentration in patients with cancer

PURPOSE

Everolimus treatment is seriously hampered by its toxicity profile. As a relationship between everolimus exposure and effectiveness and toxicity has been established, early and ongoing concentration measurement can be key to individualize the dose and optimize treatment outcomes. Dried blood spot (DBS) facilitates sampling at a patients' home and thereby eases dose individualization. The aim of this study is to determine the agreement and predictive performance of DBS compared to whole blood (WB) to measure everolimus concentrations in cancer patients.

METHODS

Paired DBS and WB samples were collected in 22 cancer patients treated with everolimus and analyzed using UPLC-MS/MS. Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok analysis were used to determine method agreement. Limits of clinical relevance were set at a difference of ± 25%, as this would lead to a different dosing advice. Using DBS concentration and Passing-Bablok regression analysis, WB concentrations were predicted.

RESULTS

Samples of 20 patients were suitable for analysis. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean ratio of everolimus WB to DBS concentrations of 0.90, with 95% of data points within limits of clinical relevance. Passing-Bablok regression of DBS compared to WB revealed no constant bias (intercept 0.02; 95% CI 0.93-1.35) and a small proportional bias (slope 0.89; 95% CI 0.76-0.99). Predicted concentrations showed low bias and imprecision and 90% of samples had an absolute percentage prediction error of < 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

DBS is a valid method to determine everolimus concentrations in cancer patients. This can especially be of value for early recognition of over- or underexposure to enable dose adaptations.

Continuous low plasma concentrations of everolimus provides equivalent efficacy to oral daily dosing in mouse xenograft models of human cancer

PURPOSE

Everolimus is a drug used successfully in a number of different oncology indications, but significant on-target toxicities exist. We explored the possibility of improving the therapeutic index (TI) by studying alternative means of administering the drug based upon low continuous dosing.

METHODS

All studies were performed using naïve nude mice or nude mice bearing s.c. human renal 786-O tumours or human breast MDA-MB-468 tumours. Everolimus was administered via a standard emulsion, either i.v., p.o., i.p., s.c., or via s.c. osmotic mini-pumps (MP) or via poly-lactic-co-glycolic (PLGA)-microparticles (PLGA-µP) prepared from everolimus powder injected s.c. Total-drug levels in blood, plasma or tissues were quantified ex vivo by LC-MS/MS. Efficacy studies were performed over 2-3 weeks and toxicity assessed by changes in body weight, glucose and white blood cell count. Effects on tumour activity biomarkers were quantified using reverse-phase protein array.

RESULTS

Everolimus administration s.c. in an emulsion decreased the absorption rate but increased the C _max and bio-availability of everolimus compared to standard approaches of administration p.o. or i.p. Everolimus administration s.c. via MP or PLGA-µP reduced the C _max and provided continuous low concentrations of everolimus in the plasma, which inhibited tumour pS6/S6 to a similar degree to oral administration. Toxicities such as changes in body weight or white blood cell count were unaffected. Provided the everolimus concentration was above the free unbound IC50 for proliferation of the tumour cell line, efficacy could be achieved equivalent to that provided by standard oral administration. However, an overall improvement in the TI could not be demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous low plasma concentrations of everolimus can provide strong efficacy in preclinical models, which if translatable to the clinic may reduce on-target toxicities and so increase the TI.