Exploring parent attitudes around using incentives to promote engagement in family-based weight management programs

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Loss versus Gain Incentives to Improve Adherence to an Obesity Treatment Intervention in Adolescents

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Adherence to pediatric obesity treatment can be challenging. Monetary incentives improve adherence to lifestyle interventions, with incentives framed as loss often more effective than those framed as gain. The objectives of this study were to determine if monetary incentives in the form of gift cards would improve adherence to an obesity treatment intervention and whether framing the incentive as either loss or gain affected adherence.

METHODS

Sixty adolescents with obesity (body mass index of ≥95th percentile for age and sex) were recruited from our pediatric obesity treatment program. They were randomized into one of three groups and given a monthly adherence score (AS) of up to 100 points. These points were based on completing a medical visit, reporting on diet intake, and measuring daily steps on a wearable tracker. The Gain Group (GG), N = 20, started each month with USD 0 in a virtual account and increased their monetary reward up to USD 100 depending on AS. The Loss Group (LG), N = 21, began each month with USD 100 in their virtual account, which decreased based on adherence. The Control Group (CG), N = 19, received USD 10 monthly.

RESULTS

Adherence was highest in the GG, with 66.0 points, compared to the LG, with 54.9 points, and CG, with 40.6 points, with p < 0.01. The GG had greater adherence to their step goal (14.6) and dietary reporting (18.7) compared to the LG (10.0 and 13.9) and the CG (3.9 and 8.1), p < 0.005.

CONCLUSIONS

Gain-framed incentives are superior to loss-framed ones in improving adherence to pediatric obesity treatments.

Evaluation of a voucher scheme to increase child physical activity in participants of a school physical activity trial in the Hunter region of Australia

BACKGROUND

Global population data suggest that physical activity levels in children remain unacceptably low. Improved participation in organised sport has been recommended by the WHO as one strategy to improve population levels of physical activity. In 2018, in the state of New South Wales, Australia, the government introduced the Active Kids scheme, to help families meet the cost of getting children into organized sport. The aim of this study is to describe the uptake of Active Kids and assess the impact of the scheme on organized sport participation and child physical activity in a region of New South Wales.

METHODS

A pragmatic longitudinal study was undertaken of parents/carers from primary school aged children (5-12 years) in the Hunter region of NSW, Australia. Baseline data were collected between Oct-Dec 2017, with follow-up 12 months later. A telephone survey occurred at both time points, asking questions regarding registration and redemption of an Active Kids voucher for their child, child participation in organised sports and child physical activity levels.

RESULTS

Of the 974 parents/carers who consented to participate, 511 (52.5%) completed the telephone surveys at both time points. A very large proportion of children (n = 454, 89.0%) were reported by their parents/carers at baseline as meeting the minimum physical activity guideline of 60 min per day. Of participating parents/carers in this study, 407 (96.0%) reported redeeming an Active Kids voucher. Children who redeemed a voucher had three times the odds to participate in organized team sports from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.009). Sub group analyses identified that females who redeemed a voucher had four times the odds to participate in organized team sports (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the already active nature of this sample, no significant improvements in physical activity levels were noted, but the positive contribution community sport can have on health and wellbeing amongst children is reinforced. Whilst voucher schemes can address financial burdens across all socio-economic groups, more population targeting is needed to deliver voucher schemes to the most disadvantaged and inactive segments of the population in order to increase physical activity.

What Motivates Engagement in a Community-Based Behavior Change Strategy for Overweight Children?

Introduction. The success of family-based community programs for childhood obesity may be increased by promoting social-cognitive factors that influence motivation and participant engagement. Incentivizing behavior can potentially enhance engagement and encourage behavior change. This research investigated motivators to engagement with a multicomponent incentive-based strategy to improve attendance and health-related behavior change in a family community-based weight management program for overweight and obese children. Method. Qualitative analysis combining; demographic data (n = 512), survey of parents (n = 273), and stakeholder (n = 10) and family interviews (n = 24). Participants were selected from program providers and families participating in an Australian community weight management program during a randomized controlled trial (n = 512 children). Maximum variation sampling (demographics and group characteristics) and inductive thematic analysis were used. Results/Conclusion. Four factors influencing engagement were (1) personal value, (2) achievement, (3) support, and (4) overwhelm. These themes corroborated with social-cognitive factors, fostered by a combination of behavior change components in the program that increased participant accountability and intrinsic motivation. Focusing on autonomous goal planning with parental involvement, tracking of goals, and reviewing of goals may complement existing strategies in child-focused treatment programs. Low-value noncash incentives linked to goal setting for encouraging healthy eating and physical activity were well accepted and may enhance family engagement and attendance.

Adolescent and parent perspectives on the acceptability of financial incentives to promote self-care in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

An understanding of acceptability among potential intervention participants is critical to the design of successful real-world financial incentive (FI) programs. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore adolescent and parent perspectives on the acceptability of using FI to promote engagement in diabetes self-care in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

METHODS

Focus groups with 46 adolescents with T1D (12-17 years old) and 39 parents of adolescents with T1D were conducted in the Seattle metropolitan area. Semistructured questions addressed participants' current use of incentives to promote change in diabetes self-care and receptivity to a theoretical incentive program administered by a third-party. Qualitative data were analyzed and emergent themes identified.

RESULTS

Three thematic categories informed participant views about the acceptability of FI programs: (a) the extent to which using FIs in the context of diabetes management fit comfortably into a family's value system, (b) the perceived effectiveness for FIs to promote improved diabetes self-care, and (c) the urgent need for improved self-care due to the threat of diabetes-related health complications. These factors together led most parents and adolescents to be open to FI program participation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this qualitative study suggest that well-designed FI programs to support diabetes management are acceptable to families with adolescents with T1D. Additionally, the use of FIs may have the potential to support adolescents with T1D in developing strong self-care habits and ease the often-turbulent transition to independent self-care.

The NEW Keiki Program Reduces BMI z-scores Among Overweight and Obese Children and BMI Among Their Adult Caregivers in Hawai'i

The high prevalence of childhood obesity highlights the need for effective weight management interventions. This study evaluated a family-based weight management program (Nutrition+Exercise+Weight Management; NEW Keiki) in overweight and obese children and their adult caregivers. Data were collected on overweight (body mass index, BMI = 85th-94th percentile) and obese (BMI > 95th percentile) children (n = 75, 5-14 years) and their adult caregivers (n = 104). Seventy-one percent of the enrolled children identified as Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, and/or Filipino (NHPI+F). Families participated weekly in a multidisciplinary lifestyle program for 8-9 weeks (intervention phase); follow-up visits occurred at 6-months and 12-months post-intervention. Long-term data (14-50 months post intervention) were collected by chart review for the children. Change in children's BMI z-score and adult BMI were analyzed. The effects of ethnicity, acceptance of government assistance, and program attendance were evaluated. Participants identifying as NHPI+F and/or receiving government assistance had higher baseline BMI z-scores and BMIs. In children, BMI z-score decreased from baseline at all evaluation visits (-0.05 at 2 months [P < .001], -0.07 at 6-month follow-up [P < .001], -0.04 at 12-month follow-up [P = .05], -0.06 at long-term follow-up [P = .01]). At the 2 month visit BMI decreased from baseline for adults (-0.39 [P < .001]). Decreases in BMI z-score and BMI were independent of program attendance, ethnicity, and acceptance of government assistance. This study, unique in its inclusion of both adults and overweight children, supports the effectiveness of a community-developed program to address weight management in an ethnically diverse population.

Assessment of Parents' Preferences for Incentives to Promote Engagement in Family-Based Childhood Obesity Treatment

Importance

Family-based treatment (FBT) is recommended for childhood obesity, but even when sought, attrition is high. Extrinsic incentives, which have been effective for improving adult health, could improve FBT engagement.

Objective

To assess parents' preferences for FBT incentives.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Survey study of parents of children aged 6 to 17 years with obesity (body mass index in ≥95th percentile for age and sex). Parents' preferences for FBT incentive program attributes were assessed in a discrete choice experiment conducted using a nationally representative, web-based survey in March 2018. Attributes included (1) the monetary value of the incentive, (2) the payment structure, (3) the goal being incentivized, and (4) the person(s) being incentivized. A fractional factorial design was used to create a set of profiles representing hypothetical FBT incentives. Parents were presented with 10 pairs of profiles and asked which would most motivate them in FBT. Parents were also asked about preferences between a small, guaranteed incentive and a lottery for a large incentive. Analyses used a hierarchical Bayesian model and linear regressions.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Parents' preference for different incentive program attributes and levels.

Results

The nationally representative survey had a 41.4% eligibility rate (n = 339) and a 89.7% completion rate (n = 304). A total of 53.3% of respondents (weighted percentage) were non-Hispanic white, 42.6% had an annual household income less than $50 000, and 28.3% had a bachelor's degree. Parents preferred higher incentives, although they were willing to accept lower-value incentives if both the parent and the child (vs the child alone) were required to meet the goal (mean difference [MD], -$108; 95% CI, -$132 to -$84), if the incentive used a gain-framed vs loss-framed payment structure (MD, -$72; 95% CI, -$85 to -$59), and if physical activity goals were incentivized over weight loss (MD, -$63; 95% CI, -$82 to -$44) or dietary monitoring (MD, -$5; 95% CI, -$1 to $28). Only 20.6% of parents preferred a lottery over a guaranteed payment. Preferences did not vary among demographic or health subgroups.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, parent-stated preferences did not align with FBT best practices or behavioral economic theory. A randomized clinical trial could examine whether aligning incentives with preferences or best practices would maximize FBT engagement and behavior change.