Managing Pain in the Setting of Opioid Use Disorder

Feasibility of Web-Based Single-Session Empowered Relief in Patients With Chronic Pain Taking Methadone or Buprenorphine: Protocol for a Single-Arm Trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain affects tens of millions of US adults and continues to rise in prevalence. Nonpharmacologic behavioral pain treatments are greatly needed and yet are often inaccessible, particularly in settings where medication prescribing is prioritized.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to test the feasibility of a live-instructor, web-based 1-session pain relief skills class in an underserved and potentially at-risk population: people with chronic pain prescribed methadone or buprenorphine either solely for pain or for comorbid opioid use disorder (OUD).

METHODS

This is a national, prospective, single-arm, uncontrolled feasibility trial. The trial is untethered from medical care; to enhance participants' willingness to join the study, no medical records or drug-monitoring records are accessed. At least 45 participants will be recruited from outpatient pain clinics and from an existing research database of individuals who have chronic pain and are taking methadone or buprenorphine. Patient-reported measures will be collected at 6 time points (baseline, immediately post treatment, 2 weeks, and months 1-3) via a web-based platform, paper, or phone formats to include individuals with limited internet or computer access and low literacy skills. At baseline, participants complete demographic questions and 13 study measures (Treatment Expectations, Body Pain Map, Medication Use, Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS], Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Measures, and Opioid Craving Scale). Immediately post treatment, a treatment satisfaction and acceptability measure is administered on a 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) scale, with 3 of these items being the primary outcome (perceived usefulness, participant satisfaction, and likelihood of using the skills). At each remaining time point, the participants complete all study measures minus treatment expectations and satisfaction. Participants who do not have current OUD will be assessed for historical OUD, with presence of OUD (yes or no), and history of OUD (yes or no) reported separately. Feasibility threshold is set as an overall group treatment satisfaction rating of 8 of 10. In-depth qualitative interviews will be conducted with about 10 participants to obtain additional data on patient perceptions, satisfactions, needs, and wants. To assess preliminary efficacy, we will examine changes in pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, pain bothersomeness, sleep disturbance, pain interference, depression, anxiety, physical function, global impression of change, and opioid craving at 1 month post treatment.

RESULTS

This project opened to enrollment in September 2021 and completed the recruitment in October 2023. The data collection was completed in February 2024. Results are expected to be published in late 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this trial will inform the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of Empowered Relief in this population and will inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial testing web-based Empowered Relief in chronic pain and comorbid OUD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05057988; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05057988.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/53784.

Association of Opioid Use Disorder Diagnosis with Management of Acute Low Back Pain: A Medicare Retrospective Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines recommend nonpharmacologic and nonopioid therapies as first-line pain treatment for acute pain. However, little is known about their utilization generally and among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) for whom opioid and other pharmacologic therapies carry greater risk of harm.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between a pre-existing OUD diagnosis and treatment of acute low back pain (aLBP).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using 2016-2019 Medicare data.

PARTICIPANTS

Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with a new episode of aLBP.

MAIN MEASURES

The main independent variable was OUD diagnosis measured prior to the first LBP claim (i.e., index date). Using multivariable logistic regressions, we assessed the following outcomes measured within 30 days of the index date: (1) nonpharmacologic therapies (physical therapy and/or chiropractic care), and (2) prescription opioids. Among opioid recipients, we further assessed opioid dose and co-prescription of gabapentin. Analyses were conducted overall and stratified by receipt of physical therapy, chiropractic care, opioid fills, or gabapentin fills during the 6 months before the index date.

KEY RESULTS

We identified 1,263,188 beneficiaries with aLBP, of whom 3.0% had OUD. Two-thirds (65.8%) did not receive pain treatments of interest at baseline. Overall, nonpharmacologic therapy receipt was less prevalent and opioid and nonopioid pharmacologic therapies were more common among beneficiaries with OUD than those without OUD. Beneficiaries with OUD had lower odds of receiving nonpharmacologic therapies (aOR = 0.62, 99%CI = 0.58-0.65) and higher odds of prescription opioid receipt (aOR = 2.24, 99%CI = 2.17-2.32). OUD also was significantly associated with increased odds of opioid doses ≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents/day (aOR = 2.43, 99%CI = 2.30-2.56) and co-prescription of gabapentin (aOR = 1.15, 99%CI = 1.09-1.22). Similar associations were observed in stratified groups though magnitudes differed.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicare beneficiaries with aLBP and OUD underutilized nonpharmacologic pain therapies and commonly received opioids at high doses and with gabapentin. Complementing the promulgation of practice guidelines with implementation science could improve the uptake of evidence-based nonpharmacologic therapies for aLBP.

The current state of knowledge on care for co-occurring chronic pain and opioid use disorder: A scoping review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Opioid use disorder often co-occurs with chronic pain but assessment and treatment of these co-occurring disorders is complex. This review aims to identify current treatments and delivery models for co-occurring chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) documented in the scientific literature.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

METHODS

The review was conducted in six databases in June 2022 (no time limit): CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed and Embase. The PRISMA-ScR checklist was used to guide reporting.

RESULTS

Forty-seven publications addressing the issue of co-occurring chronic pain and OUD management were included. Randomized controlled trials provide evidence for the effectiveness of opioid agonist treatments (OAT) such as methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone, as well as for combining OAT with Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement or cognitive behavioural therapy. A number of other pharmacological treatments (opioid and nonopioid), nonpharmacological treatments (e.g. physiotherapy) and service delivery models (e.g. simultaneous treatment of comorbidities, interdisciplinary and interprofessional collaboration) are also underlined. In most cases, authors recommend a combination of strategies to meet patient needs.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoping review reveals gaps in evidence-based knowledge to effectively care for co-occurring chronic pain and OUD, but several experts recommend the uptake of known 'best' practices such as integrated treatment of the multiple biopsychosocial dimensions of the co-occurring disorders as well as collaborative interdisciplinary work.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Improving services is dependent on alleviating barriers such as working in silos, the costs associated with nonpharmacological treatments, and the double stigma associated with pain in people with a substance use disorder.

Compassionate Care for People with Cancer and Opioid Use Disorder

ABSTRACT

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is an important comorbidity to assess and manage in people with cancer. In this article, the authors discuss strategies for safe opioid management in individuals with OUD and cancer-related pain using a composite case example. They highlight core approaches to pain management, including motivational interviewing, harm reduction, and evidence-based treatments, as well as advocacy for person-centered end-of-life care.

Piloting Smart Home Sensors to Detect Overnight Respiratory and Withdrawal Symptoms in Adults Prescribed Opioids

BACKGROUND

Novel strategies are needed to curb the opioid overdose epidemic. Smart home sensors have been successfully deployed as digital biomarkers to monitor health conditions, yet they have not been used to assess symptoms important to opioid use and overdose risks.

AIM

This study piloted smart home sensors and investigated their ability to accurately detect clinically pertinent symptoms indicative of opioid withdrawal or respiratory depression in adults prescribed methadone.

METHODS

Participants (n = 4; 3 completed) were adults with opioid use disorder exhibiting moderate levels of pain intensity, withdrawal symptoms, and sleep disturbance. Participants were invited to two 8-hour nighttime sleep opportunities to be recorded in a sleep research laboratory, using observed polysomnography and ambient smart home sensors attached to lab bedroom walls. Measures of feasibility included completeness of data captured. Accuracy was determined by comparing polysomnographic data of sleep/wake and respiratory status assessments with time and event sensor data.

RESULTS

Smart home sensors captured overnight data on 48 out of 64 hours (75% completeness). Sensors detected sleep/wake patterns in alignment with observed sleep episodes captured by polysomnography 89.4% of the time. Apnea events (n = 118) were only detected with smart home sensors in two episodes where oxygen desaturations were less severe (>80%).

CONCLUSIONS

Smart home technology could serve as a less invasive substitute for biologic monitoring for adults with pain, sleep disturbances, and opioid withdrawal symptoms. Supplemental sensors should be added to detect apnea events. Such innovations could provide a step forward in assessing overnight symptoms important to populations taking opioids.

Induced pain affects auricular and body biosignals: From cold stressor to deep breathing

Pain affects every fifth adult worldwide and is a significant health problem. From a physiological perspective, pain is a protective reaction that restricts physical functions and causes responses in physiological systems. These responses are accessible for evaluation via recorded biosignals and can be favorably used as feedback in active pain therapy via auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS). The aim of this study is to assess the significance of diverse parameters of biosignals with respect to their deflection from cold stressor to deep breathing and their suitability for use as biofeedback in aVNS stimulator. Seventy-eight volunteers participated in two cold pressors and one deep breathing test. Three targeted physiological parameters (RR interval of electrocardiogram, cardiac deflection magnitude Z _AC of ear impedance signal, and cardiac deflection magnitude PPG _AC of finger photoplethysmogram) and two reference parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressures BP _S and BP _D) were derived and monitored. The results show that the cold water decreases the medians of targeted parameters (by 5.6, 9.3%, and 8.0% of RR, Z _AC, and PPG _AC, respectively) and increases the medians of reference parameters (by 7.1% and 6.1% of BP _S and BP _D, respectively), with opposite changes in deep breathing. Increasing pain level from relatively mild to moderate/strong with cold stressor varies the medians of targeted and reference parameters in the range from 0.5% to 6.0% (e.g., 2.9% for RR, Z _AC and 6.0% for BP _D). The physiological footprints of painful cold stressor and relaxing deep breathing were shown for auricular and non-auricular biosignals. The investigated targeted parameters can be used as biofeedback to close the loop in aVNS to personalize the pain therapy and increase its compliance.

The effects of opioid policy changes on transitions from prescription opioids to heroin, fentanyl and injection drug use: a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Beginning in the 1990s, nonmedical use of prescription opioids (POs) became a major public health crisis. In response to rising rates of opioid dependence and fatal poisonings, measures were instituted to decrease the prescription, diversion, and nonmedical use of POs including prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), pain clinic laws, prescription duration limits, disciplining doctors who prescribed an excessive number of POs, and the advent of abuse deterrent formulations of POs. This paper explores the unintended effects of these policies in the descriptions of why people who use opioids transitioned from PO to injection or heroin/fentanyl use.

METHODS

We conducted 148 in-depth-interviews with people who use prescription opioids nonmedically, fentanyl or heroin from a rural, urban and suburban area in three states, Connecticut, Kentucky and Wisconsin. Interviews with people who use opioids (PWUO) focused on how they initiated their opioid use and any transitions they made from PO use to heroin, fentanyl or injection drug use.

RESULTS

The majority of participants reported initiating use with POs, which they used for medical or nonmedical purposes. They described needing to take more POs or switched to heroin or fentanyl as their tolerance increased. As more policies were passed to limit opioid prescribing, participants noticed that doctors were less likely to prescribe or refill POs. This led to scarcity of POs on the street which accelerated the switch to heroin or fentanyl. These transitions likely increased risk of overdose and HIV/HCV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

A careful analysis of how and why people say they transitioned from PO to heroin or fentanyl reveals many unintended harms of policy changes to prevent overprescribing and diversion. Results highlight the importance of mitigating harms that resulted from policy changes.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Pain, Opioid Withdrawal, and Related Symptoms: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Pain, drug cravings, and opioid withdrawal symptoms can interfere with substance use disorder or opioid tapering treatment goals.

AIM

This pilot study investigated the feasibility of a protocol designed to test opioid withdrawal symptom relief relative to a sham condition after two consecutive days of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for adults prescribed daily methadone for opioid use disorder.

METHOD

Using a double-blind protocol, eight adults were randomized to receive either a full 90-minute HBOT dose in a pressurized chamber with 100% oxygen at 2.0 atmospheres absolute (ATA) or a sham condition receiving 21% oxygen (equivalent to room air within the chamber) at a minimal pressure of ≤1.3 ATA. Measures included study retention, treatment satisfaction, and pre- and post-intervention effects for opioid withdrawal symptoms, drug cravings, pain intensity and interference, sleep quality, and mood.

RESULTS

Study retention and treatment satisfaction was high. All measurements improved more, on average, for participants receiving full-dose HBOT treatment than among participants receiving sham treatments except for clinically observed withdrawal symptoms. The largest positive effects were observed in measurements of pain intensity and drug craving.

CONCLUSIONS

These pilot results provide evidence to support a fully powered study of HBOT as a potential treatment adjunct for adults receiving methadone for opioid use disorder. Trends towards symptom improvements were detected from pre- to post-HBOT in the full treatment arm versus sham condition. More research into novel non-pharmacologic options to relieve distressing symptoms related to pain and opioid use disorder is essential to improve clinical outcomes.

A Pilot Investigation of Nonpharmacological Pain Management Intervention Groups in Methadone Maintenance Treatment

OBJECTIVES

We examined the feasibility (i.e., single-session attendance) of conducting 3 counselor-delivered nonpharmacological pain management intervention (NPMI) groups in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT): (1) Coping with Pain, an intervention based on cognitive-behavioral therapy, (2) Wii-Covery, an exergame intervention to facilitate exercise, and (3) Juggling Group, an intervention to promote social inclusion and reduce stress. We examined pre-post session changes in pain and mood associated with group attendance.

METHODS

Over 1 month at an MMT clinic with 1800 patients, each NPMI group was offered daily Monday-Friday and 1 was offered on Saturdays. A standardized but unvalidated measure was administered before and after sessions to assess acute changes in current pain intensity and mood states. Paired t-tests with Bonferroni corrections were performed for each NPMI group (P < 0.0007 [.05/7]).

RESULTS

About 452 patients (67% male, 84% White, mean age, 40) attended at least 1 NPMI group. About 57% reported current chronic pain. Attendance at any NPMI group (for the whole sample and the subset with chronic pain) was significantly associated with acute reductions in current pain intensity, anxiety, depression, and stress, and acute increases in current energy and happiness. Attendance at Coping with Pain and Juggling Group was also associated with acute increases in compassion.

CONCLUSIONS

Coping with Pain, Wii-Covery, and Juggling Group are feasible to conduct in MMT, and acute improvements in current pain intensity and specific mood states associated with a single session attendance point to the importance of examining systematically the efficacy of these and other NPMIs in MMT.

Pain Management and Risks Associated With Substance Use: Practice Recommendations

Assessing and managing pain while evaluating risks associated with substance use and substance use disorders continues to be a challenge faced by health care clinicians. The American Society for Pain Management Nursing and the International Nurses Society on Addictions uphold the principle that all persons with co-occurring pain and substance use or substance use disorders have the right to be treated with dignity and respect, and receive evidence-based, high quality assessment, and management for both conditions. The American Society for Pain Management Nursing and International Nurses Society on Addictions have updated their 2012 position statement on this topic supporting an integrated, holistic, multidimensional approach, which includes nonopioid and nonpharmacological modalities. Opioid use disorder is used as an exemplar for substance use disorders and clinical recommendations are included with expanded attention to risk assessment and mitigation with interventions targeted to minimize the risk for relapse or escalation of substance use. Opioids should not be excluded for anyone when indicated for pain management. A team-based approach is critical, promotes the active involvement of the person with pain and their support systems, and includes pain and addiction specialists whenever possible. Health care systems should establish policies and procedures that facilitate and support the principles and recommendations put forth in this article.

Primary Care Implementation of a Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Program in New York City

The ways in which prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) have been integrated into clinical practice remain understudied, and research into PDMP implementation in states where PDMP use by providers is mandated remains scant. This qualitative study describes how use of a state-mandated PDMP influenced clinical practice and opioid analgesic prescribing. We conducted face-to-face, in-depth interviews with 53 New York State-licensed primary care physicians who reported that they currently prescribed opioid analgesic medication, including those providers who reported consistent use of the PDMP (n = 38) in this sample. We used a thematic analytic approach to identify patterns of PDMP implementation into practice following enactment of the New York State legislative usage mandate. Among physicians who consistently used the PDMP, we found two distinct groups: (1) physicians who reported no change in their clinical practice and (2) physicians who acknowledged changes to both clinical practice and administrative management. In the latter group, most physicians felt the PDMP had benefited their patient relationships by fostering dialogue around patient substance use; however, some used the PDMP to dismiss patients from care. Findings suggest that increased education for providers relating to judicious prescribing, opioid use disorder, and best practice for PDMP utilization are needed.

Advanced Inpatient Management of Opioid Use Disorder in a Patient Requiring Serial Surgeries

Opioid use disorder has affected many lives across the US. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including buprenorphine, have been shown to decrease mortality in this patient population. Here we present a case of a 32-year-old woman on buprenorphine/naloxone undergoing multiple surgical operations, whose course included buprenorphine discontinuation, methadone initiation, and buprenorphine re-induction using a novel "microdosing" approach. This report includes a presentation of the case and a discussion of the clinical decision making and relevant literature to give hospitalbased providers a perspective on management of peri-operative patients on MOUD.

Chronic Pain, Opioid Use Disorder, and Clinical Management Among Older Adults

Because of unique factors related to physiological changes and altered metabolism in advanced age, special attention is needed concerning chronic pain, opioid use, and opioid use disorder among older adults. Clinicians need to follow the most updated clinical guidelines regarding opioid prescribing. Routine screening and awareness are the keys to identifying opioid use disorder. Comprehensive assessments often require both pain assessment (including functional status) and substance use assessment, including the use of urine toxicological testing and structured, validated screening tools and instruments. Comprehensive, interdisciplinary efforts are critical in managing the care of older adults with chronic pain and opioid use disorder. A collaborative approach that includes substance abuse treatment and pain management (including pain subspecialty care) is often recommended. Medications for opioid use disorder have been extensively studied and have the most convincing evidence to date, and psychosocial treatments may be beneficial in some circumstances.

A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Perceptions of Narcotic Administration after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Nearly every patient admitted to a neuroscience intensive care unit (ICU) will experience pain and nurses are tasked with analgesic administration. Within the setting of the ongoing opioid epidemic it is not well understood how nurses meet the need to alleviate pain while individualizing analgesic administration.

AIMS

This qualitative study used a phenomenological approach to determine nurses' perceptions in pain management of patientswith subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

DESIGN

Prospective qualitative inquiry using phenomenology SETTING: The study was conducted in a neuroscience intensive care unit at a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine neuroscience intensive care unit nurses were enrolled using snowball sampling.

METHODS

Saturation was reached after nine individual nurse interviews. Hermeneutic cycling analysis was used throughout interviews and codes and themes were developed throughout the interview process. Rigor was established using triangulation, rich and thick descriptions, and member checks.

RESULTS

Emerging themes included discernment and hesitation. Discernment is supported by codes such as: "nursing judgement" and "follow the orders." Hesitation is supported by codes such as "clouded exam" and "over sedation." Eight nurses made references to hesitation of administering opioids due to the perception that it would cause a poorer neurological exam. All nurses described a reliance on education, experience, or intuition to guide their decision to administer opioids along with using approved pain scales. Themes were confirmed by member checks, which prompted slight modifications to coding.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study support that nurses do express apprehension in administering opioids to patients with (SAH). This apprehension leads to hesitation to administer the medication and a thought out discernment process.

Managing pain in seriously ill patients with substance use disorders

ABSTRACT

Managing pain can be challenging, especially in patients with serious illnesses and a history of substance use disorders. This article discusses the challenges of addressing pain in these patients and offers perspectives regarding their clinical management.