1
|
Monga A, Singh D, de Moura HL, Zhang X, Zibetti MVW, Regatte RR. Emerging Trends in Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Quantitative Biomedical Imaging Applications: A Review. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:236. [PMID: 38534511 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11030236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) stands as a vital medical imaging technique, renowned for its ability to offer high-resolution images of the human body with remarkable soft-tissue contrast. This enables healthcare professionals to gain valuable insights into various aspects of the human body, including morphology, structural integrity, and physiological processes. Quantitative imaging provides compositional measurements of the human body, but, currently, either it takes a long scan time or is limited to low spatial resolutions. Undersampled k-space data acquisitions have significantly helped to reduce MRI scan time, while compressed sensing (CS) and deep learning (DL) reconstructions have mitigated the associated undersampling artifacts. Alternatively, magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) provides an efficient and versatile framework to acquire and quantify multiple tissue properties simultaneously from a single fast MRI scan. The MRF framework involves four key aspects: (1) pulse sequence design; (2) rapid (undersampled) data acquisition; (3) encoding of tissue properties in MR signal evolutions or fingerprints; and (4) simultaneous recovery of multiple quantitative spatial maps. This paper provides an extensive literature review of the MRF framework, addressing the trends associated with these four key aspects. There are specific challenges in MRF for all ranges of magnetic field strengths and all body parts, which can present opportunities for further investigation. We aim to review the best practices in each key aspect of MRF, as well as for different applications, such as cardiac, brain, and musculoskeletal imaging, among others. A comprehensive review of these applications will enable us to assess future trends and their implications for the translation of MRF into these biomedical imaging applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anmol Monga
- Center of Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Dilbag Singh
- Center of Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Hector L de Moura
- Center of Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Xiaoxia Zhang
- Center of Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Marcelo V W Zibetti
- Center of Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Ravinder R Regatte
- Center of Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Christodoulou AG, Cruz G, Arami A, Weingärtner S, Artico J, Peters D, Seiberlich N. The future of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: All-in-one vs. real-time (Part 1). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2024; 26:100997. [PMID: 38237900 PMCID: PMC11211239 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.100997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols can be lengthy and complex, which has driven the research community to develop new technologies to make these protocols more efficient and patient-friendly. Two different approaches to improving CMR have been proposed, specifically "all-in-one" CMR, where several contrasts and/or motion states are acquired simultaneously, and "real-time" CMR, in which the examination is accelerated to avoid the need for breathholding and/or cardiac gating. The goal of this two-part manuscript is to describe these two different types of emerging rapid CMR. To this end, the vision of each is described, along with techniques which have been devised and tested along the pathway of clinical implementation. The pros and cons of the different methods are presented, and the remaining open needs of each are detailed. Part 1 will tackle the "all-in-one" approaches, and Part 2 the "real-time" approaches along with an overall summary of these emerging methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony G Christodoulou
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gastao Cruz
- Michigan Institute for Imaging Technology and Translation, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ayda Arami
- Department of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Weingärtner
- Department of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | | | - Dana Peters
- Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nicole Seiberlich
- Michigan Institute for Imaging Technology and Translation, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eck BL, Yim M, Hamilton JI, da Cruz GJL, Li X, Flamm SD, Tang WHW, Prieto C, Seiberlich N, Kwon DH. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Potential Clinical Applications. Curr Cardiol Rep 2023; 25:119-131. [PMID: 36805913 PMCID: PMC10134477 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01836-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting (cMRF) has developed as a technique for rapid, multi-parametric tissue property mapping that has potential to both improve cardiac MRI exam efficiency and expand the information captured. In this review, we describe the cMRF technique, summarize technical developments and in vivo reports, and highlight potential clinical applications. RECENT FINDINGS Technical developments in cMRF continue to progress rapidly, including motion compensated reconstruction, additional tissue property quantification, signal time course analysis, and synthetic LGE image generation. Such technical developments can enable simplified CMR protocols by combining multiple evaluations into a single protocol and reducing the number of breath-held scans. cMRF continues to be reported for use in a range of pathologies; however barriers to clinical implementation remain. Technical developments are described in this review, followed by a focus on potential clinical applications that they may support. Clinical translation of cMRF could shorten protocols, improve CMR accessibility, and provide additional information as compared to conventional cardiac parametric mapping methods. Current needs for clinical implementation are discussed, as well as how those needs may be met in order to bring cMRF from its current research setting to become a viable tool for patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan L Eck
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael Yim
- Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jesse I Hamilton
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Gastao José Lima da Cruz
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, England, UK
| | - Xiaojuan Li
- Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott D Flamm
- Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - W H Wilson Tang
- Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Claudia Prieto
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, England, UK
- School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nicole Seiberlich
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Deborah H Kwon
- Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fingerprinting MINOCA: Unraveling Clues With Quantitative CMR. JACC Case Rep 2023; 7:101722. [PMID: 36776793 PMCID: PMC9911932 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2022.101722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
In the following case series, we describe the clinical presentation of 2 patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries with different underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. In both scenarios, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provided comprehensive tissue characterization with both conventional parametric mapping techniques and CMR fingerprinting. These cases demonstrate the diagnostic utility for CMR to elucidate the underlying etiology and appropriate therapeutic strategy. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
Collapse
|
5
|
Eyre K, Lindsay K, Razzaq S, Chetrit M, Friedrich M. Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Basic concepts and status of clinical development. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:953823. [PMID: 36277755 PMCID: PMC9582154 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.953823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques (SMART) are gaining attention for their potential to overcome some of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging's (CMR) clinical limitations. The major advantages of SMART lie within their ability to simultaneously capture multiple "features" such as cardiac motion, respiratory motion, T1/T2 relaxation. This review aims to summarize the overarching theory of SMART, describing key concepts that many of these techniques share to produce co-registered, high quality CMR images in less time and with less requirements for specialized personnel. Further, this review provides an overview of the recent developments in the field of SMART by describing how they work, the parameters they can acquire, their status of clinical testing and validation, and by providing examples for how their use can improve the current state of clinical CMR workflows. Many of the SMART are in early phases of development and testing, thus larger scale, controlled trials are needed to evaluate their use in clinical setting and with different cardiac pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Eyre
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada,*Correspondence: Katerina Eyre,
| | - Katherine Lindsay
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Saad Razzaq
- Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Michael Chetrit
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Matthias Friedrich
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eck BL, Seiberlich N, Flamm SD, Hamilton JI, Suresh A, Kumar Y, Hanna M, Houston A, Tew D, Tang WHW, Kwon DH. Characterization of cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Int J Cardiol 2022; 351:107-110. [PMID: 34963645 PMCID: PMC8857016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.12.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy with poor prognosis absent appropriate treatment. Elevated native myocardial T1 and T2 have been reported for CA, and tissue characterization by cardiac MRI may expedite diagnosis and treatment. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (cMRF) has the potential to enable tissue characterization for CA through rapid, simultaneous T1 and T2 mapping. Furthermore, cMRF signal timecourses may provide additional information beyond myocardial T1 and T2. METHODS Nine CA patients and five controls were scanned at 3 T using a prospectively gated cMRF acquisition. Two cMRF-based analysis approaches were examined: (1) relaxometric-based linear discriminant analysis (LDA) using native T1 and T2, and (2) signal timecourse-based LDA. The Fisher coefficient was used to compare the separability of patient and control groups from both approaches. Leave-two-out cross-validation was employed to evaluate the classification error rates of both approaches. RESULTS Elevated myocardial T1 and T2 was observed in patients vs controls (T1: 1395 ± 121 vs 1240 ± 36.4 ms, p < 0.05; T2: 36.8 ± 3.3 vs 31.8 ± 2.6 ms, p < 0.05). LDA scores were elevated in patients for relaxometric-based LDA (0.56 ± 0.28 vs 0.18 ± 0.13, p < 0.05) and timecourse-based LDA (0.97 ± 0.02 vs 0.02 ± 0.02, p < 0.05). The Fisher coefficient was greater for timecourse-based LDA (60.8) vs relaxometric-based LDA (1.6). Classification error rates were lower for timecourse-based LDA vs relaxometric-based LDA (12.6 ± 24.3 vs 22.5 ± 30.1%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that cMRF may be a valuable technique for the detection and characterization of CA. Analysis of cMRF signal timecourse data may improve tissue characterization as compared to analysis of native T1 and T2 alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan L Eck
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | - Nicole Seiberlich
- Department of Radiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Scott D Flamm
- Imaging Institute, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Jesse I Hamilton
- Department of Radiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Abhilash Suresh
- Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Yash Kumar
- Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Mazen Hanna
- Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Angel Houston
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Derrek Tew
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - W H Wilson Tang
- Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Deborah H Kwon
- Imaging Institute, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ding H, Velasco C, Ye H, Lindner T, Grech-Sollars M, O’Callaghan J, Hiley C, Chouhan MD, Niendorf T, Koh DM, Prieto C, Adeleke S. Current Applications and Future Development of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting in Diagnosis, Characterization, and Response Monitoring in Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4742. [PMID: 34638229 PMCID: PMC8507535 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled non-invasive cancer diagnosis, monitoring, and management in common clinical settings. However, inadequate quantitative analyses in MRI continue to limit its full potential and these often have an impact on clinicians' judgments. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) has recently been introduced to acquire multiple quantitative parameters simultaneously in a reasonable timeframe. Initial retrospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using MRF for various cancer characterizations. Further trials with larger cohorts are still needed to explore the repeatability and reproducibility of the data acquired by MRF. At the moment, technical difficulties such as undesirable processing time or lack of motion robustness are limiting further implementations of MRF in clinical oncology. This review summarises the latest findings and technology developments for the use of MRF in cancer management and suggests possible future implications of MRF in characterizing tumour heterogeneity and response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Ding
- Imperial College School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK;
| | - Carlos Velasco
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (C.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Huihui Ye
- State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical instrumentation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;
| | - Thomas Lindner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Matthew Grech-Sollars
- Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey GU2 7XX, UK;
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - James O’Callaghan
- UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.O.); (M.D.C.)
| | - Crispin Hiley
- Cancer Research UK, Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London WC1E 6DD, UK;
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Manil D. Chouhan
- UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London W1W 7TS, UK; (J.O.); (M.D.C.)
| | - Thoralf Niendorf
- Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbrueck, Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 13125 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK;
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Claudia Prieto
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (C.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Sola Adeleke
- High Dimensional Neurology Group, Queen’s Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK
- Department of Oncology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Qi H, Cruz G, Botnar R, Prieto C. Synergistic multi-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance image reconstruction. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2021; 379:20200197. [PMID: 33966456 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an important tool for the non-invasive diagnosis of a variety of cardiovascular diseases. Parametric mapping with multi-contrast CMR is able to quantify tissue alterations in myocardial disease and promises to improve patient care. However, magnetic resonance imaging is an inherently slow imaging modality, resulting in long acquisition times for parametric mapping which acquires a series of cardiac images with different contrasts for signal fitting or dictionary matching. Furthermore, extra efforts to deal with respiratory and cardiac motion by triggering and gating further increase the scan time. Several techniques have been developed to speed up CMR acquisitions, which usually acquire less data than that required by the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, followed by regularized reconstruction to mitigate undersampling artefacts. Recent advances in CMR parametric mapping speed up CMR by synergistically exploiting spatial-temporal and contrast redundancies. In this article, we will review the recent developments in multi-contrast CMR image reconstruction for parametric mapping with special focus on low-rank and model-based reconstructions. Deep learning-based multi-contrast reconstruction has recently been proposed in other magnetic resonance applications. These developments will be covered to introduce the general methodology. Current technical limitations and potential future directions are discussed. This article is part of the theme issue 'Synergistic tomographic image reconstruction: part 1'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haikun Qi
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 3rd Floor, Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Gastao Cruz
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 3rd Floor, Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - René Botnar
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 3rd Floor, Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Escuela de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Claudia Prieto
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 3rd Floor, Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Escuela de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|