Third-Trimester Pregnancy Complications

COVID-19 Vaccination and Reproductive Health: a Comprehensive Review for Healthcare Providers

With all the current misinformation on social media platforms about the COVID-19 vaccine and its potential effects on fertility, it is essential for healthcare providers to have evidenced-based research to educate their patients, especially those who are trying to conceive, of the risks to mothers and fetuses of being unvaccinated. It is well known that COVID-19 infection puts pregnant women at higher risk of complications, including ICU admission, placentitis, stillbirth, and death. In February of 2021, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) released a statement denying any link between COVID vaccination and infertility. ASRM later confirmed and stated that "everyone, including pregnant women and those seeking to become pregnant, should get a COVID-19 vaccine". In this review, we aim to provide a compilation of data that denies any link between vaccination and infertility for healthcare providers to be able to educate their patients based on evidence-based medicine. We also reviewed the effect of COVID-19 virus and vaccination on various parameters and processes that are essential to obtaining a successful pregnancy.

The pregnant traveller: An overview of general travel advice

Travel during pregnancy is common, but is associated with a number of risks and potential problems. There are many pregnancy-specific and destination-specific issues to be considered along with issues related to method of transport. Travel experiences should be made as safe as possible through evidence-based counselling via pregnancy healthcare providers prior to travel. This travelling in pregnancy article has been created to facilitate pregnancy healthcare providers in having these pre-travel discussions to optimise maternal and fetal wellbeing.

The Effect of Serum β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Pregnancy Complications and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The relationship among elevated serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), the incidence of pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been controversial. Differences in study design, subject bias due to demographic characteristics, and differences in local medical levels could contribute to inconsistent results.

Methods

Literature searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and China Science Digital Library (CSDL) databases. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) research subjects were singleton pregnant women; (2) the study is identified as cohort study; (3) the subjects were assigned to the high β-hCG group and control group according to whether the exposure factors increased β-hCG in the second trimester; (4) the observed outcomes include at least pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), diabetes (gestational diabetes mellitus, GMD), preterm delivery (PD), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR); and (5) the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of exposure factors are calculated based on literature dataset. To determine the risk bias of selected literatures, Newcastle-Ottawa scale was applied. The chi-square test was further used for heterogeneity analysis. If heterogeneity was identified, subgroup analyses were then performed for source investigation.

Results

A total of 13 literatures were included and analyzed, including 67,355 pregnant women and 5980 pregnant women assigned to the high β-HCG group and 61,375 pregnant women to the control group. The incidence of PIH in the high β-HCG group was higher than that in the control group (OR = 2.11, 95% CI [1.90, 2.35], Z = 13.85, P < 0.00001). There was no heterogeneity among literatures (χ² = 8.53, P = 0.38, I² = 6%), and thus there is no identified publication bias (P > 0.05). The incidence of preterm birth in the high β-HCG group was higher than that in the control group (OR = 2.11, 95% CI [1.90, 2.35], Z = 13.85, P < 0.00001). The analysis suggested no heterogeneity among included literatures (χ² = 11.78, P = 0.11, I² = 41%) and no publication bias (P > 0.05). Higher incidence of abortion was observed in the high β-HCG group compared with the control group (OR = 2.80, 95% CI [1.92, 4.09], Z = 5.32, P < 0.00001). There was no heterogeneity among literatures (χ² = 3.43, P = 0.33, I² = 13%) and no publication bias (P > 0.05). The incidence of gestational diabetes was higher in the high β-HCG group than in the control group (OR = 2.15, 95% CI [1.05, 4.40], Z = 2.09, P = 0.04). Heterogeneity was identified among literatures (χ² = 47.01, P < 0.00001, I² = 87%). Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were not robust, and there was no publication bias (P > 0.05). Compared with control, the incidence of IGUR was higher in the high β-HCG group (OR = 2.70, 95% CI [1.75, 4.19], Z = 4.45, P < 0.0001) with no heterogeneity among literatures (χ² = 3.92, P = 0.14, I² = 49%) and no publication bias (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

High levels of β-hCG during pregnancy in singleton women are associated with a high incidence of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Pregnant women with high levels of β-hCG should be monitored more closely, followed up, and given timely medical interventions to reduce the incidence of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pregnant and postpartum patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Information on the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in obstetric patients is scarce. The objective was to conduct a systematic review examining ECMO use in pregnant and postpartum patients in order to identify indications leading to ECMO use and to assess mortality rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS were searched using the terms "extracorporeal membrane oxygenation" and "pregnancy" up to 1 November 2020. Case reports and case series reporting the use of ECMO in pregnancy were eligible. Data about maternal age, gestational age, diagnosis, type of ECMO, time on ECMO, pregnancy outcomes, and maternal survival were extracted from studies.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1696 citations, of which 125 were included. There were 213 obstetric patients treated with ECMO over a 30-year period. The frequency of reports increased considerably over the last decade. The majority of patients were treated in their third trimester (28.2%) or postpartum (32.9%). Most common etiologies included influenza-induced ARDS (27.7%), pulmonary embolism (13.6%), peripartum cardiomyopathy (11.7%), and infection (11.7%). Pregnancy outcomes ended with live births, either on ECMO (15.5%, 95% CI 10.6-20.4) or not on ECMO (58.3%, 95% CI 51.7-64.9), in fetal demise (8.9%, 95% CI 5.1-12.7), or in spontaneous or induced abortion on ECMO (4.2%, 95% CI 1.5-6.9) or not on ECMO (4.2%, 95% CI 1.5-6.9). Maternal survival was 79.3%.

CONCLUSION

Although women placed on ECMO had a high mortality rate, this is likely an indication of the severity of illness. Overall, ECMO appears to be a valid therapy for the temporary support of vital organs in severely ill pregnant women.