Supramacroparticulate PE in 6 different joint endoprostheses localisations: An indicator for PE damage?

Utility of histopathological examination in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary analysis

INTRODUCTION

The utility of a routine histopathological examination in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been well explored. We aim to describe the approach and present the results of histopathological examination, focusing on its clinical usefulness in the setting of aseptic revision THA.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed 285 performed aseptic revision THA with available histopathological reports between 2015 and 2017 at a single institution. We described histopathological requests by the surgical team. Preoperative diagnoses, intraoperative findings, as well as histopathology and culture results were analysed.

RESULTS

13 painful THAs (4.5%) had preoperatively unknown diagnoses. In 10 of them, potential causes of pain were intraoperatively identified. Histopathology confirmed these findings in 8 THAs. 19 THAs (6.7%) revealed unexpected positive cultures (UPC). Histopathology was negative for infection in 18 of them. Among 16 consultants, 3 surgeons requested histopathology in 47% of the cases (130/285), usually to exclude infection (101/285; 35%). Documentation for tissue sample location was lacking in 51% (145/285), and for question asked by the surgeon in 47% (135/285).

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathology is deemed a useful confirmatory tool in the context of ruling out infection in UPCs, and in documenting intraoperative findings in painful THAs with unknown preoperative diagnoses. Importantly, the approach to requesting histopathology should be optimised. Further large-scale studies, including cost analyses, are warranted to explore the usefulness of histopathology in routine utility.

Do polyethylene wear particles affect the development of pseudotumor in total hip arthroplasty? A minimum 15-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Adverse local tissue reactions have been problematic as an implant-related complication in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite the absence of significant metal wear and corrosion, granulomatous pseudotumor has been reported to be caused by polyethylene wear. We performed a long-term follow-up study investigating the relationship between polyethylene wear and pseudotumor formation in THA.

METHODS

This study included 57 patients (64 hips) that underwent primary THA with metal-on-polyethylene or ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing over a minimum follow-up of 15 years. They were stratified into pseudotumor and non-pseudotumor groups and their linear wear rates of polyethylene liner and serum cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ion levels were compared. Pseudotumor was diagnosed on metal artifact reduction sequence-MRI according to its composition and wall thickness using the Hauptfleisch classification.

RESULTS

The incidence of pseudotumor was 34% (22/64 hips) at the mean follow-up of 16.9 years. Metal ion levels did not differ between the pseudotumor and non-pseudotumor groups, and none of the patients exceeded the Co/Cr ratio of 2.0 μg/L. Moreover, the wear rate in the pseudotumor group was 1.8 times greater than in the non-pseudotumor group (0.14 vs. 0.08 mm/year, P < 0.001). According to an analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves, the cutoff level of the wear rate to discriminate between pseudotumor and non-pseudotumor patients at 15 years was 0.11 mm/year (area under the curve = 91%; sensitivity = 95%; specificity = 78%; accuracy = 87%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results might provide new insights into excessive polyethylene wear potentially leading to the future development of both pseudotumor and osteolysis. Further studies are needed to clarify the direct relationship between polyethylene wear and pseudotumor and the mutual effects of osteolysis and pseudotumor in particle reactions.

Molded, Gamma-radiated, Argon-processed Polyethylene Components of Rotating Hinge Knee Megaprostheses Have a Lower Failure Hazard and Revision Rates Than Air-sterilized, Machined, Ram-extruded Bar Stock Components

BACKGROUND

Megaprostheses are commonly used for reconstruction after distal femoral resection in orthopaedic oncology. The polyethylene bearings in these reconstructions experience wear and wear-related complications that may result in revision surgery. Improved manufacturing and processing of polyethylene has increased the durability of components commonly used for routine arthroplasty. Alterations in the manufacture of polyethylene is expected to reduce the revision risk of oncologic megaprostheses, resulting in fewer revision procedures, but this has not been proven.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Is there a difference in the hazard of polyethylene wear or breakage leading to prosthetic revision between differences in polyethylene manufacture and processing based on a competing risk analysis?

METHODS

This was a single-center, observational, retrospective comparative study of 224 patients who had distal femur megaprostheses with identical rotating hinge articulations and knee kinematics after oncologic surgery from 1993 to 2015. No differences in surgical indications, joint articular components and kinematics, age, sex, diagnosis, BMI, use of chemotherapy, or tumor stage were seen with the patient numbers available. Prosthetic survivorship free from prosthetic revision surgery because of polyethylene wear-related revisions, defined as breakage, increased excursion on varus-valgus stress, or new locking or giving way was compared between two groups of patients: group 1 polyethylene (P1) (66 patients) who had air-sterilized machined ram-extruded bar stock or group 2 polyethylene (P2) (158 patients) molded gamma-radiated argon-processed polyethylene components. The mean follow-up duration for the P1 group (89 ± 55 months) was not different from that of patients with P2 polyethylene (79 ± 63 months; p = 0.24) including 27% (18 of 66) of patients in the P1 group and 25% (40 of 158) of patients in the P2 group followed for more than 10 years. More patients in the P2 group were lost to follow-up (9.2%, 16 of 174) than in the P1 group (5.7%, 4 of 70) but this was not statistically different (chi square; p = 0.37). The hazard of revision because of polyethylene wear or breakage was calculated with a competing risk analysis using the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model.

RESULTS

The P1 implants had a higher hazard ratio for revision caused by polyethylene damage at 120 months than did the P2 polyethylene implants (P1 HR 0.24 [95% CI 0.13 to 0.36] versus HR 0.07 [95% CI 0.03 to 0.12]), which represents an estimated absolute risk reduction of 17% (95% CI 6.15 to 27.9).

CONCLUSION

Polyethylene damage can result in megaprosthetic revisions in patients undergoing oncologic procedures. The hazard of polyethylene failure resulting in revision surgery was lower in patients who received recent polyethylene than in patients with polyethylene produced by previous methods, enhancing the durability of distal femoral megaprosthetic reconstructions. Despite improvements in polyethylene manufacture and clinical results, revision solely because of polyethylene damage still occurs in 7% of patients by the 10-year timepoint; thus, more improvement is needed. Patients who receive these implants should be monitored for signs and symptoms of polyethylene damage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Do Polyethylene Supra-Macroparticles Lead to Pseudotumor Formation in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty?

We describe 2 cases of pseudotumors induced by an unusual size of polyethylene wear particle after metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (MoP THA). The supra-macroparticles of size >100 μm originated from a polyethylene liner with relatively small cup anteversion, potentially leading to excessive loading and increased wear of the anterior edge of the polyethylene liner. Histopathology showed a foreign-body reaction to the polyethylene particles without an adverse reaction to metal debris and with no severe signs of corrosion at the head-neck junction, which have been noted in past reports of pseudotumors in MoP THA. It has been suggested that the large polyethylene wear particles might be the cause of pseudotumor formation in MoP THA.

[ARMD reaction patterns in knee arthroplasty : A novel hypothetical mechanism: hingiosis]

BACKGROUND

There are case descriptions of pronounced peri-implant inflammatory reactions and necrosis in non-infectious knee joint replacements with metal-polyethylene pairing.

OBJECTIVES

Due to the histopathological similarities to the dysfunctional metal-on-metal (MoM) hip joint replacement, MoM-like reactions in knee joint arthroplasty ("ARMD-KEP") are proposed and a histopathological comparison is made.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This analysis evaluates five cases of "ARMD-KEP" using: (1) the SLIM consensus classification, (2) the particle algorithm, (3) the CD3 focus score and (4) the AVAL score. The comparison groups consist of 11 adverse cases of MoM hip and 20 cases of knee joint arthroplasty without adverse reaction.

RESULTS

The ARMD-KEP cases were identified as SLIM type VI. Their median ALVAL score was 10. The CD3 focus score confirmed an adverse reaction. Particle corrosion was found in two of five cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This data indicates that, in rare cases, an adverse MoM-like reaction may be present in knee replacements, with inflammatory and immunological expression similar to that of the adverse MoM reaction in the hip. The pathomechanisms can be discussed as follows: (1) secondary metal-metal contact, (2) dysfunctional loading of the coupling mechanism and (3) corrosion of the metal components. Much like trunnionosis in the hip, the term "hingiosis" is proposed for corrosion phenomena in dysfunctional conditions of coupled knee endoprosthetic systems.

[Histopathological classification principles of rheumatic joint diseases : Contribution of pathology to the diagnosis]

Even though the diagnostics of rheumatic joint diseases are mostly based on clinical, immunoserological and imaging criteria, histopathology can also make a significant contribution. This is particularly true for clinically unclear monoarticular and periarticular diseases. The contribution of histopathology to the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases is manifold since the histopathological differential diagnosis includes the complete spectrum of synovial diseases. This heterogeneous pathogenetic spectrum is described in the joint pathology algorithm, which includes inflammatory and non-inflammatory diseases. To the latter group belong certain benign tumors such as the diffuse variant of the tenosynovial giant cell tumor, lipoma, hemangioma, vascular malformations and synovial chondromatosis. Additionally, the rare group of storage diseases should be kept in mind. Inflammatory diseases can be discriminated into crystal-induced arthropathies mainly such as gout and pseudogout, into granulomatous diseases such as tuberculosis and foreign-body inoculations, and finally into the large group of non-granulomatous, non-infectious synovitis. This large group is by far the most common, and it often causes difficulties in assigning the histopathological findings to a concrete rheumatologic diagnosis. In this context the synovitis score should be applied as a diagnostic device in these cases, leading to the diagnosis of a low-grade synovitis (which is associated with degenerative arthropathies) or of a high-grade synovitis (associated with rheumatic diseases). Identification of crystals and crystal-like deposits should be carried out with the application of the joint particle algorithm which addresses the identification of endogenous and non-endogenous particle deposits in the synovial tissues. Additionally, the synovitis-score may be used for evaluation of arthritis-progresssion and for the evaluation of inflammation-regression as a consequence of therapy with biologicals.

[Arthur Vick Prize 2017 of the German Society of Orthopaedic Rheumatology]

The German Society of Orthopaedic Rheumatology (DGORh) honored Prof. Dr. med. Veit Krenn (MVZ-ZHZMD-Trier) with the Arthur Vick Prize 2017. With this award, scientific results with high impact on the diagnosis, therapy and pathogenetic understanding of rheumatic diseases are honored. In cooperation with pathologists and colleagues from various clinical disciplines Prof. Dr. med. Veit Krenn developed several histopathologic scoring systems which contribute to the diagnosis and pathogenetic understanding of degenerative and rheumatic diseases. These scores include the synovitis score, the meniscal degeneration score, the classification of periprosthetic tissues (SLIM classification), the arthrofibrosis score, the particle score and the CD15 focus score. Of highest relevance for orthopedic rheumatology is the synovitis score which is a semiquantitative score for evaluating immunological and inflammatory changes of synovitis in a graded manner. Based on this score, it is possible to divide results into low-grade synovitis and high-grade synovitis: a synovitis score of 1-4 is called low-grade synovitis and occurs for example in association with osteoarthritis (OA), post-trauma, with meniscal lesions and hemochromatosis. A synovitis score of 5-9 is called high-grade synovitis, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, Lyme arthritis, postinfection and reactive arthritis as well as peripheral arthritis with Bechterew's disease (sensitivity 61.7%, specificity 96.1%). The first publication (2002) and an associated subsequent publication (2006) of the synovitis score has led to national and international acceptance of this score as the standard for histopathological assessment of synovitis. The synovitis score provides a diagnostic, standardized and reproducible histopathological evaluation method for joint diseases, particularly when this score is applied in the context with the joint pathology algorithm.