Active Breathing Coordinator reduces radiation dose to the heart and preserves local control in patients with left breast cancer: report of a prospective trial

A comparative study in left-sided breast cancer treated with moderate deep inspiratory breath hold versus free breathing

BACKGROUND

The moderate deep inspiratory breath hold (mDIBH) is a modality famed for cardiac sparing. Prospective studies based on this are few from the eastern part of the world and India. We intend to compare the dosimetry between mDIBH and free-breathing (FB) plans.

METHODS

Thirty-two locally advanced left breast cancer patients were taken up for the study. All patients received a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the chest wall/intact breast, followed by a 10-Gy boost to the lumpectomy cavity in the case of breast conservation surgery. All the patients were treated in mDIBH using active breath coordinator (ABC). The data from the two dose volume histograms were compared regarding plan quality and the doses received by the organs at risk. Paired t-test was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The dose received by the heart in terms of V5, V10, and V30 (4.55% vs 8.39%) and mean dose (4.73 Gy vs 6.74 Gy) were statistically significant in the ABC group than that in the FB group (all p-values < 0.001). Also, the dose received by the LADA in terms of V30 (19.32% vs 24.87%) and mean dose (32.99 Gy vs 46.65 Gy) were significantly less in the ABC group. The mean treatment time for the ABC group was 20 min, while that for the free-breathing group was 10 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating ABC-mDIBH for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy significantly reduces the doses received by the heart, LADA, and left and right lung, with no compromise in plan quality but with an increase in treatment time.

Can we predict who will benefit from the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique for breast cancer irradiation?

Background

The objective was to explore the clinical use of an "in-house" prototype developed to monitor respiratory motion to implement the deep inspiration breath hold technique (DIBH), compare dosimetric differences, and assess whether simple anatomic metrics measured on free breathing (FB) computed tomography scan (CT) can help in selecting patients that would benefit the most from the technique.

Materials and methods

A prospective study was conducted on patients with left breast cancer with an indication of adjuvant radiotherapy for breast only. Treatment simulation consisted of four series of CTs: the first during FB and three in DIBH to assess the reproducibility and stability of apnea. Contouring was based on the RTOG atlas, and planning was done in both FB and DIBH. Dosimetric and geometric parameters were assessed and compared between FB and DIBH.

Results

From June 2020 to December 2021, 30 patients with left breast cancer were recruited. Overall, the DIBH technique presented a mean dose reduction of 24% in the heart and 30% in the left anterior descendent coronary artery (LAD) (p < 0.05). The only geometric parameter correlated to a 30% dose reduction in the mean heart dose and LAD doses was the anterolateral distance from the heart to the chest wall of at least 1.5 cm measured on FB (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The prototype enabled the use of the DIBH technique with dose reductions in the heart and LAD. The benefit of the DIBH technique can be predicted on FB CT by measuring the distance between the heart and chest wall at the treatment isocenter.

Deep inspiration breath hold: dosimetric benefits to decrease cardiac dose during postoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer patients

Background

Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is the standard treatment for almost all patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Even with modern RT techniques, parts of the heart may still receive higher doses than those recommended by clinically validated dose limit restrictions, especially when the left breast is irradiated. Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) may reduce irradiated cardiac volume compared to free breathing (FB) treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric impact on the heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in FB and DIBH RT planning in patients with left breast cancer.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with left-sided breast cancer submitted to breast surgery followed by postoperative RT from 2015 to 2019. All patients were planned with FB and DIBH and hypofractionated dose prescription (40.05 Gy in 15 fractions).

Results

68 patients were included in the study. For the coverage of the planned target volume evaluation [planning target volume (PTV) eval] there was no significant difference between the DIBH versus FB planning. For the heart and LAD parameters, all constraints evaluated favored DIBH planning, with statistical significance. Regarding the heart, median V16.8 Gy was 2.56% in FB vs. 0% in DIBH (p < 0.001); median V8.8 Gy was 3.47% in FB vs. 0% in DIBH (p < 0.001) and the median of mean heart dose was 1.97 Gy in FB vs. 0.92 Gy in DIBH (p < 0.001). For the LAD constraints D2% < 42 Gy, the median dose was 34.87 Gy in FB versus 5.8 Gy in DIBH (p < 0.001); V16.8 Gy < 10%, the median was 15.87% in FB versus 0% in DIBH (p < 0.001) and the median of mean LAD dose was 8.13Gy in FB versus 2.92Gy in DIBH (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The DIBH technique has consistently demonstrated a significant dose reduction in the heart and LAD in all evaluated constraints, while keeping the same dose coverage in the PTV eval.

PET/MRI Assessment of Acute Cardiac Inflammation 1 Month After Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy

Our purpose was to investigate the utility of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and serial blood work to detect early inflammatory responses and cardiac functionality changes at 1 mo after radiation therapy (RT) in patients with left-sided breast cancer. Methods: Fifteen left-sided breast cancer patients who enrolled in the RICT-BREAST study underwent cardiac PET/MRI at baseline and 1 mo after standard RT. Eleven patients received deep-inspiration breath-hold RT, whereas the others received free-breathing RT. A list-mode 18F-FDG PET scan with glucose suppression was acquired. Myocardial inflammation was quantified by the change in 18F-FDG SUVmean (based on body weight) and analyzed on the basis of the myocardial tissue associated with the left anterior descending, left circumflex, or right coronary artery territories. MRI assessments, including left ventricular functional and extracellular volumes (ECVs), were extracted from T1 (before and during a constant infusion of gadolinium) and cine images, respectively, acquired simultaneously during the PET acquisition. Cardiac injury and inflammation biomarker measurements of high-sensitivity troponin T, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were measured at the 1-mo follow-up and compared with preirradiation values. Results: At the 1-mo follow-up, a significant increase (10%) in myocardial SUVmean in left anterior descending segments (P = 0.04) and ECVs in slices at the apex (6%) and base (5%) was detected (P ≤ 0.02). Further, a significant reduction in left ventricular stroke volume (-7%) was seen (P < 0.02). No significant changes in any circulating biomarkers were seen at follow-up. Conclusion: Myocardial 18F-FDG uptake and functional MRI, including stroke volume and ECVs, were sensitive to changes at 1 mo after breast cancer RT, with findings suggesting an acute cardiac inflammatory response to RT.

The effect of respiratory capacity for dose sparing in left-sided breast cancer irradiation with active breathing coordinator technique

Background and aim

A subsequent cardiac toxicity is deemed to be dose-dependent for left-sided breast cancer irradiation. This study aims to demonstrate the effect of respiratory capacity for dose sparing when the deep inspiration breath hold with Active Breathing Coordinator technique (ABC-DIBH) is used in left-sided breast cancer irradiation.

Methods

74 left-sided breast cancer patients, who received whole breast or post-mastectomy chest wall radiotherapy with ABC-DIBH between 2020 and 2021 in our center, were retrospectively reviewed in this study. CT scans of free breath (FB) and ABC-DIBH were done for each patient, and two treatment plans with a prescription dose of 5000 cGy/25 Fr were designed separately. The dose to heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD) and lungs was compared between FB and ABC-DIBH. The correlation between individual parameters (dose to organs at risk (OARs) and minimum heart distance (MHD)) was analyzed, and the effect of respiratory capacity for dose sparing was assessed.

Results

The plans with ABC-DIBH achieved lower Dmean for heart (34.80%, P &lt; 0.01) and LAD (29.33%, P &lt; 0.01) than those with FB. Regression analysis revealed that both Dmean and D2 of heart were negatively correlated with MHD in the plans with FB and ABC-DIBH, which decreased with the increase in MHD by 37.8 cGy and 309.9 cGy per 1mm, respectively. Besides, a lower Dmean of heart was related to a larger volume of ipsilateral lung in plans with FB. With the increase in volume of ipsilateral lung, the linear correlation was getting weaker and weaker until the volume of ipsilateral lung reached 1700 cc. Meanwhile, a negative linear correlation between Dmean of LAD and MHD in plans with FB and ABC-DIBH was observed, whose slope was 162.5 and 135.9 cGy/mm, respectively. Furthermore, when the respiratory capacity of ABC-DIBH reached 1L, and the relative ratio (ABC-DIBH/FB) reached 3.6, patients could obtain the benefit of dose sparing. The larger difference in respiratory capacity had no significant effect in the larger difference of MHD, Dmean of heart and Dmean of LAD between FB and ABC-DIBH.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the sufficiently good effect of ABC-DIBH when utilizing for cardiac sparing. It also reveals the correlations among individual parameters and the effect of respiratory capacity for dose sparing. This helps take optimal advantage of the ABC-DIBH technique and predict clinical benefits.

Deep inspiratory breath-hold radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer: Initial experience with Active Breathing Coordinator™ in a regional hospital

INTRODUCTION

Deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) has become standard in radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer to reduce the heart dose. This study evaluated breath-hold stability and reproducibility using Elekta's Active Breathing Coordinator™ (ABC) and its effectiveness and feasibility in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients were planned with free breathing (FB) and DIBH protocols. DIBH treatment was considered if the mean heart dose (MHD) was ≥2 Gy on the FB plan. Those who proceeded with DIBH treatment were enrolled for the pilot study. Electronic portal images of DIBH treatment beams were taken using the movie-exposure mode for breath-hold stability and reproducibility analysis. DIBH effectiveness in heart dose reduction and impact on simulation and treatment durations were compared with FB protocol.

RESULTS

Out of 56 eligible patients, 15 proceeded with DIBH treatment. The mean difference of patient setup within a single breath-hold was 0.4 mm; between different breath-holds of the same beam 1.1 mm and between different days 2.6 mm. DIBH reduced the MHD by 47% and the mean left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose by 35%. DIBH took longer time than FB in simulation and treatment. At least 14% of the eligible patients did not tolerate DIBH during simulation.

CONCLUSIONS

ABC leads to stable and reproducible breath-holds and results in significant heart dose reductions. It may not be tolerated by all patients and has resource implications.

Application of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Thoracic Respiratory Motion Management: An Assessment in a Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Radiation Therapy Environment

Purpose

Patient tolerability of magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation treatment delivery is limited by the need for repeated deep inspiratory breath holds (DIBHs). This volunteer study assessed the feasibility of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with and without DIBH for respiratory motion management during radiation treatment with an MR-linear accelerator (MR-linac).

Methods and Materials

MR imaging safety was first addressed by placing the CPAP device in an MR-safe closet and configuring a tube circuit via waveguide to the magnet bore. Reproducibility and linearity of the final configuration were assessed. Six healthy volunteers underwent thoracic imaging in a 0.35T MR-linac, with one free breathing (FB) and 2 DIBH acquisitions being obtained at 5 pressures from 0 to 15 cm-H₂O. Lung and heart volumes and positions were recorded; repeatability was assessed by comparing 2 consecutive DIBH scans. Blinded reviewers graded images for motion artifact using a 3-point grading scale. Participants completed comfort and perception surveys before and after imaging sessions.

Results

Compared with FB alone, FB-10, FB-12, and FB-15 cm H₂O significantly increased lung volumes (+23%, +34%, +44%; all P <.05) and inferiorly displaced the heart (0.86 cm, 0.96 cm, 1.18 cm; all P < . 05). Lung volumes were significantly greater with DIBH-0 cm H₂O compared with FB-15 cm H₂O (+105% vs +44%, P = .01), and DIBH-15 cm H₂O yielded additional volume increase (+131% vs +105%, P = .01). Adding CPAP to DIBH decreased lung volume differences between consecutive breath holds (correlation coefficient 0.97 at 15 cm H₂O vs 0.00 at 0 cm H₂O). The addition of 15 cm H₂O CPAP reduced artifact scores (P = .03) compared with FB; all DIBH images (0-15 cm H₂O) had less artifact (P < .01).

Conclusions

This work demonstrates the feasibility of integrating CPAP in an MR-linac environment in healthy volunteers. Extending this work to a larger patient cohort is warranted to further establish the role of CPAP as an alternative and concurrent approach to DIBH in MR-guided radiation therapy.

Comparison of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Versus Free Breathing in Radiotherapy for Left Sided Breast Cancer

Objectives

Modern breast cancer techniques, such as the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique has been applied for left-sided breast cancer. Whether the DIBH regimen is the optimal solution for left-sided breast cancer remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to elucidate the differences of DIBH and free-breathing (FB) for patients receiving radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer and provide a practical reference for clinical practice.

Methods

Relevant research available on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science published before November 30, 2021 was independently and systematically examined by two investigators. Data were extracted from eligible studies for assessing their qualities and calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Review Manager software 5.4 (RevMan 5.4).

Results

Forty-one studies with a total of 3599 left-sided breast cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with FB, DIBH reduced heart dose (Dmean, Dmax, V30, V10, V5), left anterior descending branch (LAD) dose (Dmean, Dmax), ipsilateral lung dose (Dmean, V20, V10, V5), and heart volume significantly. Lung volume increased greatly, and a statistically significant difference. For contralateral breast mean dose, DIBH has no obvious advantage over FB. The funnel plot suggested this study has no significant publication bias.

Conclusions

Although DIBH has no obvious advantage over FB in contralateral breast mean dose, it can significantly reduce heart dose, LAD dose, ipsilateral lung dose, and heart volume. Conversely, it can remarkably increase the ipsilateral lung volume. This study suggests that soon DIBH could be more widely utilized in clinical practice because of its excellent dosimetric performance.

The impact of modern radiotherapy on long-term cardiac sequelae in breast cancer survivor: a focus on deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique

INTRODUCTION

One of the most feared side effects of radiotherapy (RT) in the setting of breast cancer (BC) patients is cardiac toxicity. This side effect can jeopardize the quality of life (QoL) of long-term survivors. The impact of modern techniques of RT such as deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) have dramatically changed this setting. We report and discuss the results of the literature overview of this paper.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature references were obtained with a PubMed query, hand searching, and clinicaltrials.gov.

RESULTS

We reported and discussed the toxicity of RT and the improvements due to the modern techniques in the setting of BC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

BC patients often have a long life expectancy, thus the RT should aim at limiting toxicities and at the same time maintaining the same high cure rates. Further studies are needed to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio to identify patients at higher risk and to tailor the treatment choices.

Evaluation of DIBH and VMAT in Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancers After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Planning Study

Background: Dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were compared among 3 different radiotherapy (RT) modalities in left breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Methods: Eleven patients with left breast cancer after BCS were enrolled and underwent CT simulation in the free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) position. Three-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated for each patient in the DIBH positions. A 3DCRT plan was also created in the FB position. A dose-volume histogram (DVH) was used to analyze each evaluation index of PTV and OARs. The principal outcomes were PTV dose, heart dose, right breast dose, left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) dose, and left lung dose. Results: For 3DCRT plans, significant dose reductions were demonstrated in all evaluation parameters of the heart, LADCA, and left lung doses in the DIBH position compared with those in the FB position (P < 0.05). In the DIBH position, significant dose reductions were found in the heart and LADCA in VMAT plans compared to those in 3DCRT plans (P < 0.05). For the right breast, VMAT reduced Dmean significantly (0.32 Gy vs 0.08  Gy, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between 3DCRT and VMAT plans for the left lung dose in the DIBH position. The indicators of PTV had no significant difference between the 3 plans. Conclusion: DIBH and VMAT could reduce dosimetric parameters of the OARs in left breast cancer patients after BCS. RT plans for left breast cancer after BCS can be optimized by DIBH and VMAT techniques to minimize radiation-induced toxicity.

The advantages of abdominal compression with shallow breathing during left-sided postmastectomy radiotherapy by Helical TomoTherapy

BACKGROUND

Left-sided post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) certainly precedes some radiation dose to the cardiopulmonary organs causing many side effects. To reduce the cardiopulmonary dose, we created a new option of the breathing adapted technique by using abdominal compression applied with a patient in deep inspiration phase utilizing shallow breathing. This study aimed to compare the use of abdominal compression with shallow breathing (ACSB) with the free breathing (FB) technique in the left-sided PMRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty left-sided breast cancer patients scheduled for PMRT were enrolled. CT simulation was performed with ACSB and FB technique in each patient. All treatment plans were created on a TomoTherapy planning station. The target volume and dose, cardiopulmonary organ volume and dose were analyzed. A linear correlation between cardiopulmonary organ volumes and doses were also tested.

RESULTS

Regarding the target volumes and dose coverage, there were no significant differences between ACSB and FB technique. For organs at risk, using ACSB resulted in a significant decrease in mean (9.17 vs 9.81 Gy, p<0.0001) and maximum heart dose (43.79 vs 45.45 Gy, p = 0.0144) along with significant reductions in most of the evaluated volumetric parameters. LAD doses were also significantly reduced by ACSB with mean dose 19.24 vs 21.85 Gy (p = 0.0036) and the dose to 2% of the volume (D2%) 34.46 vs 37.33 Gy (p = 0.0174) for ACSB and FB technique, respectively. On the contrary, the lung dose metrics did not show any differences except the mean V5 of ipsilateral lung. The positive correlations were found between increasing the whole lung volume and mean heart dose (p = 0.05) as well as mean LAD dose (p = 0.041) reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACSB technique significantly reduced the cardiac dose compared with the FB technique in left-sided PMRT treated by Helical TomoTherapy. Our technique is uncomplicated, well-tolerated, and can be applied in limited resource center.

Quantifying inter- and intra-fraction variations of breast cancer radiotherapy with skin dose measurements

Aim. The aim of the current study was to compare between the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique and free-breathing (FB) method in the treatment delivery uncertainty of breast cancer radiotherapy using skin dose measurements.Methods. In a prospective manner, eighty patients were randomly selected for skin dose measurements, and they were assigned to two groups. DIBH (40 patients) and FB (40 patients). The systematic inter-fraction dose variation was quantified using the mean percentage error (MPE) between the average measured total dose per session in three consecutive sessions and the corresponding calculated point dose from the treatment planning system. The random inter-fraction dose variation was quantified using the standard deviation (SD) of the dose delivered by the medial or lateral tangential fields, or the total session dose in the three sessions (SD_MT, SD_LT, or SD_total, respectively). While the random intra-fraction dose variation was quantified using the SD of the dose difference between the medial and lateral tangential fields in three consecutive sessions (SD_MT-LT).Results. There was no statistically significant difference in MPE between the DIBH and FB groups (p = 0.583). Moreover, the mean SD_totaland SD_MTof the DIBH group were significantly lower than that of the FB group (2.75 ± 2.33 cGy versus 4.45 cGy ± 4.33, p = 0.048) and (1.94 ± 1.63 cGy versus 3.76 ± 3.42 cGy, p = 0.007), respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the mean SD_LTand SD_MT-LTbetween the two groups (p > 0.05).Conclusion. In addition to the advantage of reducing the cardiopulmonary radiation doses in left breast cancer, the DIBH technique could reduce the treatment delivery uncertainty compared to the FB method due to the significant reduction in the random inter-fraction dose variations.

Comparison of thoracic and abdominal deep inspiration breath holds in whole-breast irradiation for patients with left-sided breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique is effective for heart dose reduction in patients with left-sided breast cancer. In deep breathing, some women breathe in thoracic respiration; and others, in abdominal respiration. This study evaluated differences in dose reduction in organs at risk (OAR) and reproducibilities of the target and OAR between thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH) and abdominal DIBH (A-DIBH).

METHODS

Fourteen patients with left-sided breast cancer who had planned to receive whole-breast irradiation were included. Computed tomography (CT) was performed in free breathing (FB), T-DIBH, and A-DIBH, and the dosimetric indexes of the target and OAR for three treatment plans were compared. In T-DIBH and A-DIBH, two series CTs were taken in each breathing method and the displacements of the target and heart were calculated.

RESULTS

The averaged mean heart doses (MHDs) were 1.5 Gy and 1.6 Gy in T-DIBH and A-DIBH, respectively, significantly lower than 2.7 Gy in FB (p < 0.001 for both breathing methods). Between T-DIBH and A-DIBH, no significant difference in MHD was found (p = 0.95); however, the percentage increase in lung volume positively moderately correlated with the reduction in MHD (R = 0.68). The three-dimensional target displacements were 2.3 mm in T-DIBH and 2.0 mm in A-DIBH (p = 0.64). The three-dimensional heart displacements were 1.7 mm in T-DIBH and 1.8 mm in A-DIBH (p = 0.85).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that the MHD and reproducibility did not differ between T-DIBH and A-DIBH. However, the superior breathing method for increasing lung volume should be determined for each patient.

Dosimetric Comparisons of Simulation Techniques for Left-Sided Breast Cancer in the COVID-19 Era: Techniques to Reduce Viral Transmission and Respect the Therapeutic Ratio

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic challenges our ability to safely treat breast cancer patients and requires revisiting current techniques to evaluate optimal strategies. Potential long-term sequelae of breast radiation have been addressed by deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), prone positioning, and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) average intensity projection (AveIP)-based planning techniques. Dosimetric comparisons to determine the optimal technique to minimize the normal tissue dose for left-sided breast cancers have not been performed.

Methods

Ten patients with left-sided, early-stage breast cancer undergoing whole breast radiation were simulated in the prone position, supine with DIBH, and with a free-breathing 4DCT scan. The target and organs at risk (OAR) contours were delineated in all scans. Target volume coverage and OAR doses were assessed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA were used to detect differences in dosimetric parameters among the different treatment plans. Significance was set as p < 0.05.

Results

We demonstrate differences in heart and lung dose by the simulation technique. The mean heart doses in the prone, DIBH, and AveIP plans were 129 cGy, 154 cGy, and 262 cGy, respectively (p=0.02). The lung V20 in the prone, DIBH, and AveIP groups was 0.5%, 10.3% and 9.5%, respectively (p <0.001). Regardless of technique, lumpectomy planning target volume (PTV) coverage did not differ between the three plans with 95% of the lumpectomy PTV volume covered by 100.4% in prone plans, 98.5% in AveIP plans, and 99.3% in DIBH plans (p=0.7).

Conclusions

Prone positioning provides dosimetric advantages as compared to DIBH. When infection risks are considered as in the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, prone plans have advantages in reducing the risk of disease transmission. In instances where prone positioning is not feasible, obtaining an AveIP simulation may be useful in more accurately assessing heart and lung toxicity and informing a risk/benefit discussion of DIBH vs free breath-hold techniques.

Deep inspiration breath hold reduces the mean heart dose in left breast cancer radiotherapy

Background

Patients with left breast cancer who undergo radiotherapy have a non-negligible risk of developing radiation-induced cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cardioprotection can be achieved through better treatment planning protocols and through respiratory gating techniques, including deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH). Several dosimetric studies have shown that DIBH reduces the cardiac dose, but clinical data confirming this effect is limited. The aim of the study was to compare the mean heart dose (MHD) in patients with left breast cancer who underwent radiotherapy at our institution as we transitioned from non-gated free-breathing (FB) radiotherapy to gated radiotherapy (FB-GRT), and finally to DIBH.

Patients and methods

Retrospective study involving 2022 breast cancer patients who underwent radiotherapy at West Pomeranian Oncology Center in Szczecin from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2017. We compared the MHD in these patients according to year of treatment and technique.

Results

Overall, the MHD for patients with left breast cancer in our cohort was 3.37 Gy. MHD values in the patients treated with DIBH were significantly lower than in patients treated with non-gated FB (2.1 vs. 3.48 Gy, p < 0.0001) and gated FB (3.28 Gy, p < 0.0001). The lowest MHD values over the four-year period were observed in 2017, when nearly 85% of left breast cancer patients were treated with DIBH. The proportion of patients exposed to high (> 4 Gy) MHD values decreased every year, from 40% in 2014 to 7.9% in 2017, while the percentage of patients receiving DIBH increased.

Conclusions

Compared to free-breathing techniques (both gated and non-gated), DIBH reduces the mean radiation dose to the heart in patients with left breast cancer. These findings support the use of DIBH in patients with left breast cancer treated with radiotherapy.

The necessity of using deep inspiration breath-hold in the radiotherapy of left breast cancer patients who undergo the UK FAST trial

Aim : The purpose of the current study was to compare between deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB) method in the setup reproducibility and to perform a dosimetric comparison between both methods in left-sided breast cancer patients who undergo the UK FAST trial. Materials and methods : The online matching correction data were retrospectively collected for 50 patients treated with the FAST trial. They were equally divided into DIBH and FB groups to compare between both methods in the setup reproducibility and create the appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margin. Ten patients out of the fifty were scanned in DIBH and FB to perform a dosimetric comparison with the strict acceptance criteria of the FAST trial. Results : All heart dosimetric parameters of the DIBH was significantly lower than that of FB (p < 0.001), and the lung V30% of DIBH plans was significantly lower than FB plans (p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the two methods in the other organs at risk doses. To fulfill the heart and lung constraints in FB plans, the PTV V90% was reduced by 3.4%, and three plans would not attain the PTV acceptance criteria. There was no significant difference between the systematic or random setup errors between both methods except the left-right random shift was significantly lower in DIBH cases (p = 0.004). The calculated PTV margins were (4 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm) for DIBH group, and (5 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm) for FB group in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and left-right shifts, respectively. Conclusion : It is highly warranted to treat left-sided breast cancer patients with the DIBH technique when the UK FAST trial is employed for treatment.

Matched-pair dosimetric comparison of cardiac radiation exposure between deep-inspiration breath-hold whole-breast radiation therapy with Active Breathing Coordinator and interstitial multicatheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy as accelerated partial breast irradiation in adjuvant treatment of left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To compare dosimetrically the radiation exposure to heart, left ventricle (LV), and left anterior descending artery (LAD) between whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with Active Breathing Coordinator (ABC; ABC-WBRT) and interstitial multicatheter high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as accelerated partial breast irradiation (ABPI; imHDR-APBI) for left-sided breast cancer (BCA) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2019, 32 and 20 patients were treated with ABC-WBRT (63 Gy/2.25 Gy) and imHDR-APBI (32 Gy/4 Gy), respectively. Among them a matched-pair analysis was performed according to tumor location (clock position) before BCS as well as planning target volume of imHDR-APBI and boost volume of ABC-WBRT. This yielded 17 pairs of patients for whom dosimetric parameters for heart, LV, and LAD were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney test was used for comparison after adjusting for equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions (EQD2). In addition, a second analysis of ABC-WBRT to 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions was performed in order to account for the EQD2 difference between the 63-Gy ABC-WBRT and the imHDR-APBI protocol.

RESULTS

Tumor location for the 17 pairs of patients relative to breast quadrant was as follows: upper outer 8, lower outer 5, upper inner 3, and lower inner 1. There was no difference regarding mean heart dose (MHD) and V5, whereas D25%, D45%, V10, and V25 significantly favored imHDR-APBI. Likewise, mean dose- and V5-LV did not differ, while Dmax- and V23-LV were significantly higher for ABC-WBRT. For LAD, Dmax, D25%, and V30 significantly favored imHDR-APBI without differences for mean dose and V40. When comparing imHDR-APBI with the 40.05 Gy ABC-WBRT schedule, MHD and mean dose LV were significantly lower in favor of ABC-WBRT.

CONCLUSION

ABC-WBRT and imHDR-APBI yield similar low heart and LV exposure for left-sided BCA after BCS, whereas LAD can be better spared with imHDR-APBI.

Reducing Cardiac Radiation Dose From Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy With Breath Hold Training and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

The delivery of radiation therapy shares many of the challenges encountered in imaging procedures. As in imaging, such as MRI, organ motion must be reduced to a minimum, often for lengthy time periods, to effectively target the tumor during imaging-guided therapy while reducing radiation dose to nearby normal tissues. For patients, radiation therapy is frequently a stress- and anxiety-provoking medical procedure, evoking fear from negative perceptions about irradiation, confinement from immobilization devices, claustrophobia, unease with equipment, physical discomfort, and overall cancer fear. Such stress can be a profound challenge for cancer patients' emotional coping and tolerance to treatment, and particularly interferes with advanced radiation therapy procedures where active, complex and repetitive high-level cooperation is often required from the patient.In breast cancer, the most common cancer in women worldwide, radiation therapy is an indispensable component of treatment to improve tumor control and outcome in both breast-conserving therapy for early-stage disease and in advanced-stage patients. High technological complexity and high patient cooperation is required to mitigate the known cardiac toxicity and mortality from breast cancer radiation by reducing the unintended radiation dose to the heart from left breast or left chest wall irradiation. To address this, radiation treatment in daily deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), to create greater distance between the treatment target and the heart, is increasingly practiced. While holding the promise to decrease cardiac toxicity, DIBH procedures often augment patients' baseline stress and anxiety reaction toward radiation treatment. Patients are often overwhelmed by the physical and mental demands of daily DIBH, including the nonintuitive timed and sustained coordination of abdominal thoracic muscles for prolonged breath holding.While technologies, such as DIBH, have advanced to millimeter-precision in treatment delivery and motion tracking, the "human factor" of patients' ability to cooperate and perform has been addressed much less. Both are needed to optimally deliver advanced radiation therapy with minimized normal tissue effects, while alleviating physical and cognitive distress during this challenging phase of breast cancer therapy.This article discusses physical training and psychotherapeutic integrative health approaches, applied to radiation oncology, to leverage and augment the gains enabled by advanced technology-based high-precision radiation treatment in breast cancer. Such combinations of advanced technologies with training and cognitive integrative health interventions hold the promise to provide simple feasible and low-cost means to improve patient experience, emotional outcomes and quality of life, while optimizing patient performance for advanced imaging-guided treatment procedures - paving the way to improve cardiac outcomes in breast cancer survivors.

Practical Heart Sparing Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Resource-Limited Radiation Oncology Clinics

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report experiences of practical heart sparing breast radiation therapy (RT) using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in resource-limited radiation oncology clinics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients underwent computed tomography-simulations with both free-breathing (FB) and CPAP under the individual maximum tolerable air pressure. For each patient, left-sided breast RT plans (9 with breast only, 3 with breast and regional nodal stations) with FB and CPAP were created using 3-dimensional conformal RT (supine tangential or wide tangential RT fields) according to RTOG 1304. For daily RT, patients started CPAP in the patients waiting area for 15 minutes before entering the treatment room and continued CPAP during RT. Treatment setup times between breast RT with and without CPAP were compared.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated CPAP well with 8 to 15 cm H2O of air pressure. Compared with FB, CPAP inflated the thorax and increased total lung volume by 35±16% (CPAP: 3136±751 vs. FB: 2354±657 cm, P<0.01); caudally displaced the heart by 1.8 cm (P<0.01); and decreased heart volume within tangential RT fields on computed tomography-simulation scans by 96±4% (1.4±2.5 vs. 21±17 cm, P=0.02) in all patients. Planning target volume coverage was acceptable in all RT plans. CPAP lowered mean dose (Dmean) to heart by 47±22% (2.5±1.5 vs. 5.4±3.3 Gy, P<0.01); heart volume receiving ≥25 Gy (V25) by 82±18% (2.2±2.6 vs. 9.1±7.1%, P<0.01); Dmean to left anterior descending coronary artery by 68±8% (4.7±1.9 vs. 14.8±3.3 Gy, P<0.01). CPAP decreased radiation dose to ipsilateral lung compared with FB: 9.1±5.8 versus 11.2±8 Gy (20% reduction, P=0.03) of Dmean; 15.7±12.5 vs. 20.5±17.5% (25% reduction, P=0.03) of V20. RT with CPAP did not increase treatment setup time compared with FB (week 1: 362±63 vs. 352±77 s; week 2 to 5: 217±13 vs. 201±14 s, all P>0.25).

CONCLUSION

Novel use of CPAP allowed efficient and practical heart sparing breast RT without increasing infrastructural requirements in resource-limited radiation oncology clinics.

CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) is an effective and stable solution for heart sparing radiotherapy of left sided breast cancer

PURPOSE

Limiting the heart dose in left sided breast cancer radiotherapy is critical. We sought to study the effect of using CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) as an aid in reducing heart dose in breast cancer radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with left sided breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy were enrolled on a prospective IRB (institutional review board) approved clinical trial utilizing CPAP during radiotherapy. Each patient was simulated and planned with and without CPAP and the best dosimetric results determined the patient's treatment. Data on the differences in lung and heart volume and position as well as boost cavity position with and without CPAP were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four women from 10/16 to 10/18 were enrolled. Seven patients were not treated on study; only two of these were due to treatment issues. Median age was 54 years. 70% had breast only radiation and 30% were treated to breast\CW (chest wall) and regional nodes. The median lung volume with CPAP was 60% larger than without CPAP. (1637 vs. 996 cc) p < 0.001. The median heart volume decreased 12% with CPAP. (338 vs. 382 cc) In regards to the DVH, CPAP decreased mean heart dose from 3.02 to 1.6Gy (p = .0075) and V20 of the lungs from 17.1 to 13.8 with CPAP but this was not significant.

CONCLUSION

CPAP assisted radiotherapy was tolerable and produced superior treatment plans in left sided breast cancer. This method is worthy of further investigation as a method to normal tissue sparing treatment of left sided breast cancer patients.

Fraction-specific post-treatment quality assurance for active breath-hold radiation therapy

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate variation in the treatment hold pattern and quantify its dosimetric impact in breath-hold radiotherapy, using fraction-specific post-treatment quality assurance.

Material and Methods

A patient with lung mets treated using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with active breath coordinator (ABC) was recruited for the study. Treatment beam hold conditions were recorded for all the 25 fractions. The linearity and reproducibility of the dosimetric system were measured. Variation in the dose output of unmodulated open beam with beam hold was studied. Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) was performed with and without beam hold, and the results were compared to quantify the dosimetric impact of beam hold.

Results

There was a considerable amount of variation observed in the number of beam hold for the given field and the monitor unit at which the beam held. Linearity and reproducibility of the dosimetric system were found within the acceptable limits. The average difference over the 25 measurements was 0·044% (0·557 to −0·318%) with standard deviation of 0·248.

Conclusion

Patient comfort with the ABC system and responsiveness to the therapist communication help to maintain consistent breathing pattern, in turn consistent treatment delivery pattern. However, the magnitude of dosimetric error is much less than the acceptable limits recommended by IROC. The dosimetric error induced by the beam hold is over and above the dose difference observed in conventional PSQA.

Tumor localization accuracy for high-precision radiotherapy during active breath-hold

BACKGROUND

Conventionally fractionated and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for thoracoabdominal tumors may utilize breath-hold techniques. However, there are concerns that differential amounts of inspired airflow may result in unplanned tumor dislocation and underdosing. Thus, we investigated tumor localization accuracy associated with lung volume variations during breath-hold treatment via an automated-gating interface.

METHODS

Twelve patients received breath-hold treatment with the active breathing coordinator (ABC) through an automated-gating interface. All breath-hold volumes were recorded at CT simulation, setup imaging, and during treatment, and analyzed as a function of airflow rate into the ABC. The variation of breath-hold volumes was calculated for each fraction over entire course. Intrafraction target motion related to the breathing variation was investigated based on daily imaging acquired before the breath-hold treatment. Correlation between target location and breath-hold variation was statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The air volume held by the ABC increased as the airflow rate increased on inhalation and decreased on exhalation. The mean range of airflow rate was 0.77 L/s and 0.29 L/s in the conventionally fractionated and SBRT patients, respectively. The maximum air volume difference with respect to the reference volume at the CT simulation was 1.0 L for conventional fractionation and 0.16 L for SBRT. The target dislocation caused by 0.25 L of air volume difference was 6 mm for SBRT. Three patients showed significant correlation between the target location and breath-hold variations.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation shows that because variations in the breath-hold volume may cause target dislocation, patient-specific breath-hold setting is required to improve tumor localization accuracy.

A seven-year experience of using moderate deep inspiration breath-hold for patients with early-stage breast cancer and dosimetric comparison

We present our seven-year experience of using moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (mDIBH) with an active breathing control (ABC) device for patients with early-stage breast cancer and dosimetric comparison to evaluate the benefit of mDIBH on the heart, lung, and liver.We retrospectively reviewed all patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and having clinical stage Tis, I, or II disease treated between November 2010 and October 2017. Among the 369 patients included in this study, 107 patients were treated with mDIBH and 262 patients were treated with free breathing (FB). Dosimetric analysis was performed to compare dose distribution in the heart, lung, and liver between the two treatment groups. The chi-square test was used to compare the distribution of stage and tumor site between the two groups. The independent samples t-test was used to compare the remaining parameters between the two groups.For all 369 patients, there was a significantly lower ipsilateral lung V5 (relative volume receiving ≧5 Gy), ipsilateral lung V10, ipsilateral lung V20, mean ipsilateral lung dose, whole lung V5, whole lung V10, whole lung V20, mean whole lung dose, heart V10, heart V30, heart V40, and mean heart dose in the mDIBH group. For 184 patients with a left-sided breast tumor, significantly lower ipsilateral lung V5, ipsilateral lung V10, ipsilateral lung V20, mean ipsilateral lung dose, whole lung V10, whole lung V20, mean whole lung dose, heart V10, heart V30, heart V40, and mean heart dose were observed in the mDIBH group. For 185 patients with a right-sided breast tumor, significantly lower ipsilateral lung V5, ipsilateral lung V10, ipsilateral lung V20, mean ipsilateral lung dose, whole lung V5, whole lung V10, whole lung V20, mean whole lung dose, heart V10, heart V30, heart V40, mean heart dose, liver V30, and mean liver dose were observed in the mDIBH group.For early-stage breast cancer patients, mDIBH reduces not only the heart dose but also the lung and liver doses. The routine integration of mDIBH using an ABC device may decrease radiation-induced toxicity in the heart, lung, and liver.

Dosimetric evaluation and systematic review of radiation therapy techniques for early stage node-negative breast cancer treatment

Radiation therapy (RT) is essential in treating women with early stage breast cancer. Early stage node-negative breast cancer (ESNNBC) offers a good prognosis; hence, late effects of breast RT becomes increasingly important. Recent literature suggests a potential for an increase in cardiac and pulmonary events after RT. However, these studies have not taken into account the impact of newer and current RT techniques that are now available. Hence, this review aimed to evaluate the clinical evidence for each technique and determine the optimal radiation technique for ESNNBC treatment. Currently, six RT techniques are consistently used and studied: 1) prone positioning, 2) proton beam RT, 3) intensity-modulated RT, 4) breath-hold, 5) partial breast irradiation, and 6) intraoperative RT. These techniques show dosimetric promise. However, limited data on late cardiac and pulmonary events exist due to challenges in long-term follow-up. Moving forward, future studies are needed to validate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of these current techniques.

Evaluation of a new predictor of heart and left anterior descending artery dose in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy to the left breast

Background

Heart-sparing techniques are time and resource intensive, although not all patients require the use of these strategies. This study evaluates the performance of different distance metrics in predicting the need for breath-hold radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy.

Methods

Fifty left-sided breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast from a single institution were retrospectively studied. The left breast and organs at risk were contoured in accordance to guidelines and a plan with tangents was obtained using the free-breathing CT in supine position. Heart (mean heart dose (MHD), heart V25 Gy) and left anterior descending artery dosimetry were computed and compared against distance metrics under investigation (Contact Heart, 4th Arch and 5th Arch). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to determine optimal cut-points for distance metrics for dosimetric end points. Receiver operating characteristic curves and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the association between distance metrics and dosimetric endpoints. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of dosimetric end points.

Results

The mean MHD and heart V25 Gy were 2.3 Gy and 10.4 cm³, respectively. With tangents, constraints for MHD (< 1.7 Gy and V25 Gy < 10 cm³) were unattainable in 80% and 46% of patients, respectively. Optimal RPA thresholds included: Contact Heart (73 mm), 4th Arch (7 mm) and 5th Arch (41 mm). Of these, the 4th Arch had the highest overall accuracy, sensitivity, concordance index and correlation coefficient. All metrics were statistically significant predictors for MHD ≥ 1.7 Gy based on univariable logistic regression. Fifth Arch did not reach significance for heart V25 Gy ≥ 10 cm³. Fourth Arch was the only predictor to remain statistically significant after multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

We propose a novel “4th Arch” metric as an accurate and practical tool to determine the need for breath-hold radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy with standard tangents. Further validation in an external cohort is necessary.

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

The prognosis of patients with metastatic cancers has improved in the past decades due to effective chemotherapy and oligometastatic surgery. For inoperable patients, local ablation therapies, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), can provide effective local tumor control with minimal toxicity. Because of its high precision and accuracy, SBRT delivers a higher radiation dose per fraction, is more effective, and targets smaller irradiation volumes than does conventional radiotherapy. In addition, steep dose gradients from target lesions to surrounding normal tissues are achieved using SBRT; thus, SBRT provides more effective tumor control and exhibits fewer side effects than conventional radiotherapy. The use of SBRT is prevalent for treating intracranial lesions (known as stereotactic radiosurgery); however, it is now also used for treating spinal and adrenal metastases. Because of advancements in image-guided assistance and respiratory motion management, several studies have investigated the use of SBRT for treating lung or liver tumors, which move as a patient breathes. The results of these studies have suggested that SBRT favorably controls tumors in the case of moving lesions. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) with an abdominal compressor (AC) is clinically convenient for effective respiratory motion management. Because this method is noninvasive and allows free breathing, its use reduces complications. Furthermore, patients consider this method convenient. Moreover, it is considered more efficient than other methods of respiratory motion management by physicians and therapists. The use of 4D-CT with an AC for treating pulmonary lesions has also been widely investigated, and the technique is gaining acceptance for treating hepatic lesions. However, the protocols for using 4D-CT with an AC for treating hepatic lesions are different from those used for treating pulmonary lesions. In this article, we describe a new protocol for SBRT with 4D-CT and an AC for treating liver metastases.

Deep Inspiration Breath Hold: Techniques and Advantages for Cardiac Sparing During Breast Cancer Irradiation

Historically, heart dose from left-sided breast radiotherapy has been associated with a risk of cardiac injury. Data suggests that there is not a threshold for the deleterious effects from radiation on the heart. Over the past several years, advances in radiation delivery techniques have reduced cardiac morbidity due to treatment. Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is a technique that takes advantage of a more favorable position of the heart during inspiration to minimize heart doses over a course of radiation therapy. In the accompanying review article, we outline several methods used to deliver treatment with DIBH, quantify the benefits of DIBH treatment, discuss considerations for patient selection, and identify challenges associated with DIBH techniques.

A clinical example of extreme dose exposure for an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator : Beyond the DEGRO guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Considering that the number of malignant diseases in patients over 65 years of age is increasing, it often occurs that patients who carry a cardiac implanted electronic device must undergo radiotherapy. Ionizing radiation can disturb the function of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). As a result of this, an update of the DEGRO/DKG guidelines for radiotherapy of this patient group has been published.

METHODS

We report the case of a patient with an ICD and T‑lymphoblastic lymphoma with cardiac involvement, who received i.a. a total body irradiation with 8 Gy followed by a consolidating radiotherapy of the pericardium with 14 Gy as well as additional radiotherapy courses after consecutive recurrences. For the purposes of the treatment, the antitachyarrhythmia (ATA) therapy was deactivated and temporarily replaced through a life vest.

RESULTS

According to the current DEGRO guidelines for irradiation of patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices, a categorization of the patient in the "high-risk" group was made. Furthermore, regular telemetric checks of the ICD device were performed before and after treatment. Despite unavailable declaration of the manufacturer regarding the cumulative tolerable dose and DEGRO recommendation for a cumulative dose <2 Gy, the aftercare was unproblematic and normal values were assessed for all relevant ICD parameters, despite a cumulative dose >10 Gy in the device.

CONCLUSION

This case shows that if the cardiac implanted electronic devices are not directly irradiated und the energy used is reduced to 6 MV, irradiation-induced damage is less likely and can possibly be prevented.

Deep inspiration breathhold for left-sided breast cancer patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy requiring internal mammary nodal irradiation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of moderate deep inspiration breathhold (mDIBH) in reducing heart exposure in left breast cancer patients who have unfavorable cardiac anatomy and need internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used maximum heart distance (MHD), defined as the maximum distance of the heart within the treatment field, >1 cm as a surrogate for unfavorable cardiac anatomy. Twenty-two left breast cancer patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy requiring IMLN-RT underwent free-breathing (FB) and mDIBH computed tomography simulation and planning. Three-dimensional partially wide tangents (3D-PWTs) and intensity modulated RT plans were generated. Dose-volume histograms were used to compare heart and lung dosimetric parameters. Duration of treatment delivery was recorded for all fractions.

RESULTS

MHD decreased significantly in mDIBH scans. mDIBH significantly reduced mean heart dose (222.7 vs 578.4 cGy; P < .0001) and percentage of left lung receiving doses ≥20 Gy (V20; 31.93 vs 38.41%; P = .0006) in both 3D-PWT and intensity modulated RT plans. The change in MHD after breathhold reliably predicted mean heart dose reduction after mDIBH. Radiation was effectively delivered in 11.31 ± 3.40 minutes with an average of 10.06 ± 2.74 breathholds per fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

mDIBH is efficient and can effectively decrease mean heart dose in patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy who need IMLN-RT, thus simplifying planning and delivery for them. The reduction in mean heart dose is proportional to the reduction in maximum heart distance.

Fraction size in radiation therapy for breast conservation in early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Shortening the duration of radiation therapy would benefit women with early breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery. It may also improve access to radiation therapy by improving efficiency in radiation oncology departments globally. This can only happen if the shorter treatment is as effective and safe as conventional radiation therapy. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2008 and updated in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of altered radiation fraction size for women with early breast cancer who have had breast conserving surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Specialised Register (23 May 2015), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 4), MEDLINE (Jan 1996 to May 2015), EMBASE (Jan 1980 to May 2015), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal (June 2010 to May 2015) and ClinicalTrials.gov (16 April 2015), reference lists of articles and relevant conference proceedings. No language or publication constraints were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of altered fraction size versus conventional fractionation for radiation therapy in women with early breast cancer who had undergone breast conserving surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors performed data extraction independently, with disagreements resolved by discussion. We sought missing data from trial authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We studied 8228 women in nine studies. Eight out of nine studies were at low or unclear risk of bias. Altered fraction size (delivering radiation therapy in larger amounts each day but over fewer days than with conventional fractionation) did not have a clinically meaningful effect on: local recurrence-free survival (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.15, 7095 women, four studies, high-quality evidence), cosmetic outcome (Risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.01, 2103 women, four studies, high-quality evidence) or overall survival (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03, 5685 women, three studies, high-quality evidence). Acute radiation skin toxicity (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.45, 357 women, two studies) was reduced with altered fraction size. Late radiation subcutaneous toxicity did not differ with altered fraction size (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.05, 5130 women, four studies, high-quality evidence). Breast cancer-specific survival (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06, 5685 women, three studies, high quality evidence) and relapse-free survival (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.05, 5685 women, three studies, moderate-quality evidence) did not differ with altered fraction size. We found no data for mastectomy rate. Altered fraction size was associated with less patient-reported (P < 0.001) and physician-reported (P = 0.009) fatigue at six months (287 women, one study). We found no difference in the issue of altered fractionation for patient-reported outcomes of: physical well-being (P = 0.46), functional well-being (P = 0.38), emotional well-being (P = 0.58), social well-being (P = 0.32), breast cancer concerns (P = 0.94; 287 women, one study). We found no data with respect to costs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that using altered fraction size regimens (greater than 2 Gy per fraction) does not have a clinically meaningful effect on local recurrence, is associated with decreased acute toxicity and does not seem to affect breast appearance, late toxicity or patient-reported quality-of-life measures for selected women treated with breast conserving therapy. These are mostly women with node negative tumours smaller than 3 cm and negative pathological margins.

Modeled risk of ischemic heart disease following left breast irradiation with deep inspiration breath hold

PURPOSE

Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) dramatically reduces radiation dose to the heart during radiation therapy (RT) for left-sided breast cancer, but the subsequent risk of radiation-related ischemic heart disease (IHD) is unknown. Our primary objective was to quantify the risk of IHD following RT with DIBH using modeled risk estimates (MRE).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with stage 0-III left-sided breast cancer who received RT with DIBH were retrospectively studied. Computed tomography simulations were performed with DIBH and during free breathing (FB) for comparison of dosimetry. Patients were classified as high risk, at risk, or at optimal risk for IHD and baseline risk estimates for IHD were obtained from historic controls. The excess relative risk of IHD because of left breast RT was calculated using patient-specific dosimetry and an existing dose-effect model. MRE were determined from the sum of baseline risk estimates and excess risk.

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2011, 111 patients were treated using DIBH and 104 were available for analysis. MRE for 10-year risk of IHD with DIBH and FB were 3.25% (interquartile range [IQR], 1.20-3.44) and 3.64% (IQR, 1.43-3.81) (P < .0001), respectively. MRE for lifetime risk of IHD with DIBH and FB were 9.71% (IQR, 1.98-16.62) and 10.28% (IQR, 2.05-16.97) (P < .0001), respectively. MRE were significantly reduced by use of DIBH in all risk groups. The largest absolute risk reduction resulting from the DIBH technique was observed in patients at high risk for IHD. The median relative risk reduction in MRE resulting from DIBH was 11.4% (range, 0-32.0) and 6.4% (range, 0-23.4) at 10 years and throughout the patients' lifetime, respectively. After a median follow-up of 7.0 years (range, 1.3-11.2), the estimated 10-year freedom from IHD was 99.0% (95% confidence interval 93.4-99.8).

CONCLUSIONS

RT with DIBH may provide breast cancer survivors a clinically significant reduction in the risk of IHD.

Deep Inspiration Breath Hold-Based Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Review

Several recent developments in linear accelerator-based radiation therapy (RT) such as fast multileaf collimators, accelerated intensity modulation paradigms like volumeric modulated arc therapy and flattening filter-free (FFF) high-dose-rate therapy have dramatically shortened the duration of treatment fractions. Deliverable photon dose distributions have approached physical complexity limits as a consequence of precise dose calculation algorithms and online 3-dimensional image guided patient positioning (image guided RT). Simultaneously, beam quality and treatment speed have continuously been improved in particle beam therapy, especially for scanned particle beams. Applying complex treatment plans with steep dose gradients requires strategies to mitigate and compensate for motion effects in general, particularly breathing motion. Intrafractional breathing-related motion results in uncertainties in dose delivery and thus in target coverage. As a consequence, generous margins have been used, which, in turn, increases exposure to organs at risk. Particle therapy, particularly with scanned beams, poses additional problems such as interplay effects and range uncertainties. Among advanced strategies to compensate breathing motion such as beam gating and tracking, deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) gating is particularly advantageous in several respects, not only for hypofractionated, high single-dose stereotactic body RT of lung, liver, and upper abdominal lesions but also for normofractionated treatment of thoracic tumors such as lung cancer, mediastinal lymphomas, and breast cancer. This review provides an in-depth discussion of the rationale and technical implementation of DIBH gating for hypofractionated and normofractionated RT of intrathoracic and upper abdominal tumors in photon and proton RT.

Prospective assessment of deep inspiration breath-hold using 3-dimensional surface tracking for irradiation of left-sided breast cancer

PURPOSE

Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is used to decrease cardiac irradiation during radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer. The patients most likely to benefit and the impact on treatment time remain largely unknown. We sought to identify predictors for the use of DIBH and to quantify differences in dosimetry and treatment time using a prospective registry.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 150 patients with left breast cancer were enrolled. All patients were simulated with both free breathing (FB) and DIBH. RT was delivered by either modality. Alternate scans were planned with use of deformable registration to include identical RT volumes. DIBH patients were monitored by a real-time surface tracking system, AlignRT (Vision RT, Ltd, London, United Kingdom). Baseline characteristics and treatment times were compared by Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Dosimetric endpoints were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test, and linear regression identified predictors for change in mean heart dose (∆MHD).

RESULTS

We treated 38 patients with FB and 110 with DIBH. FB patients were older, more likely to have heart and lung disease, and less likely to receive chemotherapy or immediate reconstruction (all P < .05). Treatment times were not significantly different, but DIBH patients had greater variability in times (P = .0002). Of 146 evaluable patients, DIBH resulted in >20 cGy improvement in MHD in 107 patients but a >20 cGy increase in MHD in 14. Both MHD and lung V20 were significantly lower in DIBH than in paired FB plans. On multivariate analysis, younger age (4.18 cGy per year; P < .0001), higher body mass index (6.06 cGy/kg/m(2); P = .0018), and greater change in lung volumes (130 cGy/L; P = .003) were associated with greater ∆MHD.

CONCLUSIONS

DIBH improves cardiac dosimetry without significantly impacting treatment time in most patients. Greater inspiratory lung volumes augment this benefit. Because the improvement with DIBH was not uniform, patients should be scanned with both FB and DIBH.