Once-daily high-dose pindolol for SSRI-refractory depression

Augmentative Pharmacological Strategies in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Comprehensive Review

Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is associated with poor outcomes, but a consensus is lacking in the literature regarding which compound represents the best pharmacological augmentation strategy to antidepressants (AD). In the present review, we identify the available literature regarding the pharmacological augmentation to AD in TRD. Research in the main psychiatric databases was performed (PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, PsychInfo). Only original articles in English with the main topic being pharmacological augmentation in TRD and presenting a precise definition of TRD were included. Aripiprazole and lithium were the most investigated molecules, and aripiprazole presented the strongest evidence of efficacy. Moreover, olanzapine, quetiapine, cariprazine, risperidone, and ziprasidone showed positive results but to a lesser extent. Brexpiprazole and intranasal esketamine need further study in real-world practice. Intravenous ketamine presented an evincible AD effect in the short-term. The efficacy of adjunctive ADs, antiepileptic drugs, psychostimulants, pramipexole, ropinirole, acetyl-salicylic acid, metyrapone, reserpine, testosterone, T3/T4, naltrexone, SAMe, and zinc cannot be precisely estimated in light of the limited available data. Studies on lamotrigine and pindolol reported negative results. According to our results, aripiprazole and lithium may be considered by clinicians as potential effective augmentative strategies in TRD, although the data regarding lithium are somewhat controversial. Reliable conclusions about the other molecules cannot be drawn. Further controlled comparative studies, standardized in terms of design, doses, and duration of the augmentative treatments, are needed to formulate definitive conclusions.

Distinct effects of antihypertensives on depression in the real-world setting: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Evidence is increasing that pathways of antihypertensives may have a role in the pathogenesis of depression. However, how the class of antihypertensives affects depression risk remains unclear.

METHODS

The effects of different classes of antihypertensives on depression were explored using an insurance database in Beijing, China. Antihypertensives in our study included calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers (BBs), and diuretics (DIUs). Those initially treated with only one class of antihypertensives were included. Stratified analysis was conducted for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and statin prescriptions.

RESULTS

In total, 181,709 newly detected hypertension patients were included. The median follow-up period was 4.33 years and 19,030 participants were with depression by the end. After adjusting for covariates, the incidence density (95% confidence interval, CI) of depression in the BB, ACEI, DIU, CCB, and ARB groups was 3.16 (2.98-3.33), 3.10 (2.91-3.29), 2.70 (2.45-2.94), 2.67 (2.53-2.81), and 2.30 (2.16-2.43) per 100 person-years, respectively. Compared with ARB group, the hazard ratio (95% CI) of depression for BB, ACEI, DIU, and CCB group was 1.37 (1.32-1.43), 1.35 (1.28-1.42), 1.17 (1.08-1.27), and 1.16 (1.12-1.21), respectively. Stratified analysis suggested the highest depression ID remained within the BB or ACEI group.

LIMITATIONS

Detailed clinical information was unavailable, which may introduce bias. Patients on monotherapy as initial treatment were included and caution is needed for extrapolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ARBs, there may be a class effect of other antihypertensives on the risk of depression.

Pindolol Rescues Anxiety-Like Behavior and Neurogenic Maladaptations of Long-Term Binge Alcohol Intake in Mice

Long-term binge alcohol consumption alters the signaling of numerous neurotransmitters in the brain including noradrenaline (NE) and serotonin (5-HT). Alterations in the signaling of these neuronal pathways result in dysfunctional emotional states like anxiety and depression which are typically seen during alcohol withdrawal. Interestingly, studies have demonstrated that the development of alcohol-induced negative affective states is linked to disrupted neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus (DG) region of the hippocampus in alcohol-dependent animals. We have previously shown that modulation of NE and 5-HT activity by pharmacological targeting of β-adrenoreceptors (β-ARs) and 5-HT1A/1B receptors with pindolol reduces consumption in long-term alcohol-consuming mice. Since these receptors are also involved in emotional homeostasis and hippocampal neurogenesis, we investigated the effects of pindolol administration on emotional and neurogenic deficits in mice consuming long-term alcohol (18 weeks). We report that acute administration of pindolol (32 mg/kg) reduces anxiety-like behavior in mice at 24 h withdrawal in the marble-burying test (MBT) and the elevated plus-maze (EPM). We also show that chronic (2 weeks) pindolol treatment (32 mg/kg/day) attenuates alcohol-induced impairments in the density of immature neurons (DCX⁺) but not newborn cells (BrdU⁺) in the hippocampal DG. Pindolol treatment also restores the normal proportion of newborn proliferating cells (BrdU⁺/Ki67⁺/DCX⁻), newborn proliferating immature neurons (BrdU⁺/Ki67⁺/DCX⁺) and newborn non-proliferating immature neurons (BrdU⁺/Ki67⁻/DCX⁺) following long-term alcohol intake. These results suggest that pindolol, through its unique pharmacology may rescue some but not all deficits of long-term alcohol abuse on the brain, adding further value to its properties as a strong pharmaceutical option for alcohol use disorders (AUDs).

Is pindolol augmentation effective in depressed patients resistant to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the use of pindolol augmentation in depressed patients resistant to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and PsychINFO databases from 1970 through December 2013 was conducted. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studied on unipolar SSRI-resistant depressed adults were included. The primary outcome was mean change scores of depressive symptom on the depression rating scales, assessed with standardized mean differences.

RESULTS

Five RCTs consisting of 154 patients met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. The overall pooled effect size in the primary and secondary efficacy analysis showed no significant effects of pindolol plus SSRI therapy (standardized mean difference = -0.43, p = 0.24; OR = 1.92, p = 0.39, respectively). In terms of acceptability, there was no statistical difference in either tolerability or safety between the two groups (OR = 0.46, p = 0.40; OR = 0.90, p = 0.94, respectively). These estimates remained robust through several sensitivity and subgroup analyses, except 7.5 mg-qd pindolol augmentation did show a significant benefit over 2.5-mg tid pindolol augmentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pindolol augmentation may not be suitable for treatment-resistant depression patients with SSRI-resistant depression. However, once-daily high-dose pindolol (7.5 mg qd) appears to show a promising benefit in these patients.

Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2008 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines

A revision of the 2008 British Association for Psychopharmacology evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants was undertaken in order to incorporate new evidence and to update the recommendations where appropriate. A consensus meeting involving experts in depressive disorders and their management was held in September 2012. Key areas in treating depression were reviewed and the strength of evidence and clinical implications were considered. The guidelines were then revised after extensive feedback from participants and interested parties. A literature review is provided which identifies the quality of evidence upon which the recommendations are made. These guidelines cover the nature and detection of depressive disorders, acute treatment with antidepressant drugs, choice of drug versus alternative treatment, practical issues in prescribing and management, next-step treatment, relapse prevention, treatment of relapse and stopping treatment. Significant changes since the last guidelines were published in 2008 include the availability of new antidepressant treatment options, improved evidence supporting certain augmentation strategies (drug and non-drug), management of potential long-term side effects, updated guidance for prescribing in elderly and adolescent populations and updated guidance for optimal prescribing. Suggestions for future research priorities are also made.

The integrative management of treatment-resistant depression: a comprehensive review and perspectives

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder is a prevalent and disabling illness. Notwithstanding numerous advances in the pharmacological treatment of depression, approximately 70% of patients do not remit after first-line antidepressant treatment.

METHODS

The MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov electronic databases were searched from inception to October 1, 2013, for randomized controlled trials (RCT), relevant open-label trials, meta-analyses and ongoing trials of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic approaches to treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

RESULTS

Switching to a different antidepressant is a useful option following nonresponse to a first-line agent. Although widely used in clinical practice, there is limited evidence to support antidepressant combination for TRD. Notwithstanding evidence for lithium or T3 augmentation to be successful in TRD, most studies were carried out when participants were treated with tricyclic antidepressants (TCA). Of the available strategies to augment the response to new-generation antidepressants, the use of some atypical antipsychotics is best supported by evidence. Several novel therapeutic options are currently discussed. Evidence suggests that cognitive therapy (CT) is an effective strategy for TRD.

CONCLUSIONS

The success of switching to a different antidepressant following a first-line agent is supported by evidence, but there is limited evidence for effective combination strategies. Lithium and T3 augmentation of TCA have the strongest evidence base for successful treatment of TRD. The use of augmentation of newer-generation antidepressants with atypical antipsychotics is supported by a growing evidence base. Current evidence supports CT as an effective strategy for TRD. There is a need for additional large-scale RCT of TRD. The development of new antidepressants targeting novel pathways opens a promising perspective for the management of TRD.

Pharmacological approaches to manage persistent symptoms of major depressive disorder: rationale and therapeutic strategies

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent chronic psychiatric illness associated with significant morbidity, mortality, loss of productivity, and diminished quality of life. Typically, only a minority of patients responds to treatment and meet criteria for remission as residual symptoms may persist, the result of an inadequate course of treatment and/or the presence of persistent side effects. The foremost goal of treatment should be to restore patients to full functioning and eliminate or relieve all MDD symptoms, while being virtually free of troublesome side effects. The current available pharmacological options to manage persistent depressive symptoms include augmentation or adjunctive combination strategies, both of which target selected psychobiological systems and specific mood and somatic symptoms experienced by the patient. As well, non-pharmacological interventions including psychotherapies may be used in either first-line or adjunctive approaches. However, the evidence to date with respect to available adjunct therapies is limited by few studies and those published have utilized only a small number of subjects and lack enough data to allow for a consensus of expert opinion. This underlines the need for further longer term, large population-based studies and those that include comorbid populations, all of which are seen in real world community psychiatry.

Pindolol augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of depressive disorder: a systematic review

Adding pindolol to serotonergic antidepressant treatment offers a potential strategy for producing a more rapid onset of action and an enhanced antidepressant effect. This review investigated whether pindolol enhances the efficacy of serotonergic antidepressant treatment in adult patients with depressive disorders at sequential time points up to 6 weeks.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis-Controlled Trials Register plus unpublished trial data.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised trials including depressed patients, comparing serotonergic antidepressants + pindolol with serotonergic antidepressants + placebo and using depressive symptom clinical outcomes scales.

DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical response at time points up to 6 weeks as defined by >50% depression scale score reduction was extracted for each trial as possible. Eleven studies were identified including unpublished data. The pooled odds ratios for dichotomous response to treatment at time points from 1 to 6 weeks were 2.39 (95% CI 1.40-4.06), 2.39 (1.74-3.29), 1.94 (1.46-2.58), 1.59 (1.16-2.18), 1.42 (0.87-2.31) and 1.28 (0.91-1.81). Time-to-event analysis showed a greater response with pindolol augmentation versus placebo (P = 0.04). There was significant heterogeneity between studies at some time points. Dropout rates did not significantly differ between treatment arms. This review suggests an overall beneficial clinical effect of pindolol augmentation, most clearly up to 4 weeks of treatment.

Pharmacologic approaches to treatment resistant depression: a re-examination for the modern era

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is common and debilitating. Initial treatment is often insufficient to achieve full remission in a given depressive episode, resulting in more frequent episodes, worsened severity, and major disability.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review surveys literature on the diagnosis and pharmacological management of TRD in light of recent developments. Evidence regarding commonly used treatment options is critically examined and key recommendations are offered. The review ends by considering drugs acting on the melatonin, acetylcholine, and glutamate systems that hold promise as future options for TRD.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Recent trends and research findings have impacted how the evidence supporting different approaches to TRD should be evaluated. For example, many earlier TRD studies employed tricyclics as the primary antidepressant, but tricyclics have now been superseded by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in routine clinical practice. This deficiency has been addressed by the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, the largest effectiveness study of TRD ever conducted. However, design characteristics of the STAR*D study preclude simple comparisons with earlier studies.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

A shortcoming of most treatment recommendations for TRD is their reliance on older studies that do not reflect the current preeminence of SSRIs in clinical practice. This has distorted the prioritization of pharmacological strategies for TRD. Efforts to correct this distortion with effectiveness research, designed to better reflect current practice trends, require critical consideration of the strengths and limitations of this approach.

Diffusion tensor imaging detects abnormalities in the corticospinal tracts of neonates with infantile Krabbe disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

It is not possible to determine if neonates diagnosed with Krabbe disease through statewide neonate screening programs will develop the disease as infants, juveniles, or adults. The only available treatment for this fatal neurodegenerative condition is unrelated umbilical cord transplantation, but this treatment is only effective before clinical symptoms appear. Therefore, a marker of disease progression is needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with fiber tracking in identifying early changes in major motor tracts of asymptomatic neonates with infantile Krabbe disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six neonates with infantile Krabbe disease identified because of family history underwent brain MR imaging within the first 4 weeks of life. Six-direction DTI and quantitative tractography of the corticospinal tracts were performed. Hypothesis tests, 1 for each hemisphere, were used to determine whether the fractional anisotropy (FA) ratio of the neonates with infantile Krabbe disease was significantly different from that of 45 age- and sex-matched controls.

RESULTS

The average FA ratio for patients with Krabbe disease was 0.89 and 0.87 for left and right tracts, respectively (P = .002 and < .001). After adjusting for gestational age, gestational age at birth, birth weight, sex, and race, the 6 patients with Krabbe disease had significantly lower FA values than the controls (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

DTI with quantitative tractography detected significant differences in the corticospinal tracts of asymptomatic neonates who had the early-onset form of Krabbe disease. Once standardized and validated, this tool has the potential to be used as a marker of disease progression in neonates diagnosed through statewide neonate screening programs.

Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: a revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines

A revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants was undertaken to incorporate new evidence and to update the recommendations where appropriate. A consensus meeting involving experts in depressive disorders and their management was held in May 2006. Key areas in treating depression were reviewed, and the strength of evidence and clinical implications were considered. The guidelines were drawn up after extensive feedback from participants and interested parties. A literature review is provided, which identifies the quality of evidence to inform the recommendations, the strength of which are based on the level of evidence. These guidelines cover the nature and detection of depressive disorders, acute treatment with antidepressant drugs, choice of drug versus alternative treatment, practical issues in prescribing and management, next-step treatment, relapse prevention, treatment of relapse, and stopping treatment.

Paroxetine with pindolol augmentation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in depressed in-patients

Pindolol, a 5-HT1A autoreceptor antagonist, given in combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), may enhance and/or accelerate the therapeutic efficacy of SSRIs. Fifty patients, meeting ICD-10 criteria for major depressive disorder or bipolar depression, were enrolled in our randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. One group received paroxetine plus pindolol (2.5 mg t.i.d.), and the other group received paroxetine plus placebo. The proportion of patients with sustained response (>or=50% reduction of baseline HAM-D 17 score maintained until the endpoint; p=0.252) and the proportion of patients with remission (HAM-D 17 <or=8 at last visit; p=0.769) did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. However, a significantly greater proportion of patients who were not previously treated with antidepressants (n=15; p=0.041) and of patients with bipolar depression (n=11; p=0.015) had a sustained response in the paroxetine plus pindolol group compared to the paroxetine plus placebo group; furthermore there was a trend for first episode depressed patients to have a greater response in the paroxetine plus pindolol group (n=12; p=0.071). Summarizing, the entire study population showed no antidepressive benefit from pindolol augmentation. Nevertheless patients with bipolar depression irrespective of previous treatments and duration of illness, and unipolar patients not previously treated demonstrated a significant benefit from pindolol augmentation.

Glucocorticoid receptor antagonists hasten and augment neurochemical responses to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant

BACKGROUND

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant drugs have a delayed onset and commonly produce an incomplete therapeutic response. The therapeutic actions of SSRIs are thought to depend on increased forebrain extracellular serotonin (5-HT), after desensitization of somatodendritic 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors. Here we determined whether concurrent glucocorticoid receptor (GR) blockade enhances these neurochemical responses to the SSRI fluoxetine.

METHODS

Male rats were treated (3, 7, or 14 days) with either fluoxetine (10 mg/kg IP) or vehicle once daily, in combination with either a GR antagonist (Org 34850 15 mg/kg SC or Org 34517 25 mg/kg SC) or vehicle twice daily. After treatment, 5-HT in the medial prefrontal cortex was measured by microdialysis.

RESULTS

Chronic fluoxetine treatment (14 days) raised basal 5-HT and also attenuated the fall in 5-HT after acute systemic administration of fluoxetine (10 mg/kg IP), indicating desensitization of 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors. Concurrent chronic administration (14 days) of Org 34850 or Org 34517 enhanced the fluoxetine-induced increase in basal 5-HT. Org 34850 also hastened the 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor desensitization induced by chronic fluoxetine treatment. Org 34850 alone (14 days) failed to alter basal 5-HT or 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor desensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressant response is proposed to depend on 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor desensitization and elevation of forebrain 5-HT. These data suggest adjunctive GR antagonists might both hasten and enhance antidepressant responses to SSRIs.

Early postnatal development of corpus callosum and corticospinal white matter assessed with quantitative tractography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The early postnatal period is perhaps the most dynamic phase of white matter development. We hypothesized that the early postnatal development of the corpus callosum and corticospinal tracts could be studied in unsedated healthy neonates by using novel approaches to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and quantitative tractography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isotropic 2 x 2 x 2 mm(3) DTI and structural images were acquired from 47 healthy neonates. DTI and structural images were coregistered and fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and normalized T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) signal intensities were determined in central midline and peripheral cortical regions of the white matter tracts of the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum and the central midbrain and peripheral cortical regions of the corticospinal tracts by using quantitative tractography.

RESULTS

We observed that central regions exhibited lower MD, higher FA values, higher T1W intensity, and lower T2W intensity than peripheral cortical regions. As expected, MD decreased, FA increased, and T2W signal intensity decreased with increasing age in the genu and corticospinal tract, whereas there was no significant change in T1W signal intensity. The central midline region of the splenium fiber tract has a unique pattern, with no change in MD, FA, or T2W signal intensity with age, suggesting different growth trajectory compared with the other tracts. FA seems to be more dependent on tract organization, whereas MD seems to be more sensitive to myelination.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel approach may detect small regional differences and age-related changes in the corpus callosum and corticospinal white matter tracts in unsedated healthy neonates and may be used for future studies of pediatric brain disorders that affect developing white matter.

Multi-target strategies for the improved treatment of depressive states: Conceptual foundations and neuronal substrates, drug discovery and therapeutic application

Major depression is a debilitating and recurrent disorder with a substantial lifetime risk and a high social cost. Depressed patients generally display co-morbid symptoms, and depression frequently accompanies other serious disorders. Currently available drugs display limited efficacy and a pronounced delay to onset of action, and all provoke distressing side effects. Cloning of the human genome has fuelled expectations that symptomatic treatment may soon become more rapid and effective, and that depressive states may ultimately be "prevented" or "cured". In pursuing these objectives, in particular for genome-derived, non-monoaminergic targets, "specificity" of drug actions is often emphasized. That is, priority is afforded to agents that interact exclusively with a single site hypothesized as critically involved in the pathogenesis and/or control of depression. Certain highly selective drugs may prove effective, and they remain indispensable in the experimental (and clinical) evaluation of the significance of novel mechanisms. However, by analogy to other multifactorial disorders, "multi-target" agents may be better adapted to the improved treatment of depressive states. Support for this contention is garnered from a broad palette of observations, ranging from mechanisms of action of adjunctive drug combinations and electroconvulsive therapy to "network theory" analysis of the etiology and management of depressive states. The review also outlines opportunities to be exploited, and challenges to be addressed, in the discovery and characterization of drugs recognizing multiple targets. Finally, a diversity of multi-target strategies is proposed for the more efficacious and rapid control of core and co-morbid symptoms of depression, together with improved tolerance relative to currently available agents.

A Mathematical Model for Paroxetine Antidepressant Effect Time Course and Its Interaction with Pindolol

Although selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) block monoamine uptake within hours of administration to patients, their full clinical effect does not appear until 2-4 weeks after treatment onset. Pindolol, a betablocker with weak partial 5-HT1A receptor agonist activity has been shown to produce a more rapid onset of antidepressant action of SSRIs. However, the optimal dosing schedule of pindolol remains controversial. Building on a set-point model described previously for the hypothermic effect of 5-HT agonists, we have developed a model based on the concept of homeostatic control mechanisms, in which SSRIs exert their antidepressant effect by increasing the transduction set-point of the postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor, and pindolol exerts its effect by increasing the rate of feedback mechanisms. The predictive distribution of the proportion of responders at each day of measurement (based on population simulation from the model) was not significantly different from the proportions observed in two published clinical trials, one with fluoxetine, the other with paroxetine alone or combined with pindolol. The model was applied to the simulation of paroxetine response (clinical score) time course with or without pindolol, after administration of different doses of each drug. The simulated total scores on the MADR scale obtained after treatment with paroxetine alone (20 mg/day) or paroxetine (20 mg/day) with different doses of pindolol (1.5, 7.5 and 37.5 mg/day) support that the reason for inconstant pindolol efficacy is that the 7.5 mg dose is too low. The model might be useful as a basis for clinical trial simulation.

Evidence-based guidelines: response to professor Gordon Parker's critique

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the development of the 'Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of depression' and to discuss the critique of these guidelines.

METHOD

Consideration of international practice in evidence-based medicine and rebuttal of criticisms.

RESULTS

We agree with Professor Gordon Parker on fundamental issues in the treatment of depression. His main criticisms reflect his concerns about the classification of depression. We consider that many of his detailed criticisms reflect a difference of opinion on how data should be evaluated or interpreted.

CONCLUSIONS

The guideline for the treatment of depression makes sound recommendations, in agreement with comparable guidelines from the US and the UK.