Does cognitive impairment in treatment-resistant and ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia differ from that in treatment responders?

Factors associated with cognitive dysfunction in treatment-responsive and -resistant schizophrenia: A pilot cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Cognitive dysfunction is a core feature of schizophrenia. Although treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) exhibits wide-ranging neuropsychological deficits, factors defining cognitive prognosis in TRS are unclear. We aimed to clarify the association between cognitive dysfunction and factors, such as plasma concentrations of clozapine (CLZ), N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC), and homovanillic acid (HVA), due to differences in antipsychotic responses in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

This pilot cross-sectional study included 60 Japanese patients (35 with TRS and 25 with non-CLZ antipsychotic responders (AR)). Cognitive function was evaluated using the Brief Assessment of Cognition Short Form (BAC-SF). Plasma concentrations of HVA, CLZ, and NDMC were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

The cognitive performance of patients with AR was better than that of patients with TRS in all tasks. No significant cognitive differences were detected between the CLZ responders and non-responders. The severity of negative and extrapyramidal symptoms was found to be potentially negatively associated with BAC-SF composite and several subtest scores. In patients with TRS, chlorpromazine equivalents and the CLZ/NDMC ratio were identified as factors negatively associated with Digit Sequencing and the Symbol Coding subtest scores of the BAC-SF, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that patients with TRS experience worse cognitive dysfunction than those with AR, and CLZ responsiveness in TRS may be not associated with cognitive dysfunction. Additionally, higher chlorpromazine equivalents and the CLZ/NDMC ratio may be associated with severity of cognitive dysfunction in patients with TRS. Further studies are required to clarify the relationship between treatment response and cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia.

Association between treatment resistance and cognitive function in schizophrenia

INTRODUCTION

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) affects around 30% of individuals with schizophrenia. About half of the patients with TRS who are treated with clozapine do not show a meaningful clinical response, that is, clozapine resistance. To date, the relationship between cognitive function and treatment response categories is not entirely clear. This study evaluated the cognitive performance across subgroups stratified by treatment response, and we hypothesised that cognitive impairment increases with increased treatment resistance.

METHODS

This study was conducted at the Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, and included healthy controls and people with schizophrenia categorised into these groups: antipsychotic-responsive schizophrenia (ARS), clozapine-responsive TRS (TRS-CR) and clozapine-resistant TRS (ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia [UTRS]). Cognitive function was assessed using the Brief Assessment of Cognition-Short Form. Symptoms were measured with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The planned statistical analyses included adjustments for covariates such as age, sex, PANSS scores and antipsychotic dose, which might affect cognitive function.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in overall cognitive performance between the groups: ARS had the least impairment, followed by TRS-CR and UTRS. Antipsychotic dose, and PANSS negative and disorganisation/cognitive factors were significant predictors of overall cognitive function in all patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found differences in cognitive function that aligned with levels of treatment resistance: the greater the degree of treatment resistance, the poorer the cognitive function. Interventions to improve negative and disorganisation symptoms might be effective to enhance the cognitive function and treatment outcomes in schizophrenia.

Long-Term Outcome of Clozapine in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

The favorable effect of clozapine on psychotic symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant (TR) schizophrenia (SCZ) in short-term studies is well established. However, prospective studies of the long-term outcome of clozapine treatment on psychopathology, cognition, quality of life, and functional outcome in TR-SCZ are limited.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

Here, we have examined the long-term (mean duration of follow-up 14 years) effects of clozapine on those outcomes in a prospective, open label study in 54 TR-SCZ patients. Assessments were performed at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, and at the last follow-up.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total, positive symptoms, and anxiety/depression at the last follow-up improved significantly from baseline, as well as from the 6-month evaluation ( P < 0.0001), with a 70.5% responder rate (≥20% improvement at the last follow-up from baseline). Quality of Life Scale (QLS) total improved by 72% at the last follow-up, with 24% of patients rated as having "good" functioning compared with 0% at baseline. Suicidal thoughts/behavior was significantly reduced at the last follow-up from the baseline. No significant change in negative symptoms was found at the last follow-up in the total sample. Short-term memory function declined at the last follow-up from baseline, but there was no significant change in processing speed. The QLS total showed a significant negative correlation with BPRS positive symptoms but not with cognitive measures, or negative symptoms, at the last follow-up.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

For patients with TR-SCZ, improving psychotic symptoms with clozapine seems to have a more significant impact than negative symptoms or cognition on improving psychosocial function.

Altered Neuroanatomical Signatures of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia Compared to Patients With Early-Stage Schizophrenia and Healthy Controls

Background

The relationship between brain structural changes and cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia is strong. However, few studies have investigated both neuroanatomical abnormalities and cognitive dysfunction in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). We examined neuroanatomical markers and cognitive function between patients with TRS or early-stage schizophrenia (ES-S) and healthy controls (HCs). Relationships between neuroanatomical markers and cognitive function in the patient groups were also investigated.

Methods

A total of 46 and 45 patients with TRS and ES-S and 61 HCs underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scanning and comprehensive cognitive tests. MRI scans were analyzed using the FreeSurfer to investigate differences in cortical surface area (CSA), cortical thickness (CT), cortical volume (CV), and subcortical volume (SCV) among the groups. Four cognitive domains (attention, verbal memory, executive function, and language) were assessed. Comparisons of neuroanatomical and cognitive function results among the three groups were performed.

Results

A widespread reduction in CT was observed in patients with TRS compared to HCs, but differences in cortical thinning between TRS and ES-S patients were mainly limited to the inferior frontal gyrus and insula. Several subcortical structures (accumbens, amygdala, hippocampus, putamen, thalamus and ventricles) were significantly altered in TRS patients compared to both ES-S patients and HCs. Performance in the verbal memory domain was significantly worse in TRS patients compared to ES-S patients. A positive relationship between the thickness of the left middle temporal gyrus and the composite score for language was identified in patients with ES-S.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest significant cognitive impairment and reductions in CT and SCV in individuals with TRS compared to those with ES-S and HCs. These abnormalities could act as biomarkers for earlier identification of TRS.

Functional reconfiguration of cerebellum-cerebral neural loop in schizophrenia following electroconvulsive therapy

Recent evidence highlights the role of the cerebellum-cerebral loop in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (SZ). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is clinically applied to augment the effect of antipsychotic drugs. The study aims to address whether the cerebellum-cerebral loop is involved in the mechanisms of ECT's augmentation effect. Forty-two SZ patients and 23 healthy controls (HC) were recruited and scanned using resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). Twenty-one patients received modified ECT plus antipsychotics (MSZ group), and 21 patients took antipsychotics only (DSZ group). All patients were re-scanned four weeks later. Brain functional network was constructed according to the graph theory. The sub-network exhibited longitudinal changes after ECT or medications were constructed. For the MSZ group, a sub-network involving default-mode network and cerebellum showed significant longitudinal changes. For the DSZ group, a different sub-network involving the thalamus, frontal and occipital cortex was found to be altered in the follow-up scan. In addition, the changing FC of the left cerebellar crus2 region was correlated with the changing scores of the psychotic symptoms only in the MSZ group but not in the DSZ group. In conclusion, the cerebral-cerebellum loop is possibly involved in the antipsychotic mechanisms of ECT for schizophrenia.

Neuropsychological differences between treatment-resistant and treatment-responsive schizophrenia: a meta-analysis

Antipsychotic treatment resistance affects up to a third of individuals with schizophrenia. Of those affected, 70-84% are reported to be treatment resistant from the outset. This raises the possibility that the neurobiological mechanisms of treatment resistance emerge before the onset of psychosis and have a neurodevelopmental origin. Neuropsychological investigations can offer important insights into the nature, origin and pathophysiology of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), but methodological limitations in a still emergent field of research have obscured the neuropsychological discriminability of TRS. We report on the first systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate neuropsychological differences between TRS patients and treatment-responsive controls across 17 published studies (1864 participants). Five meta-analyses were performed in relation to (1) executive function, (2) general cognitive function, (3) attention, working memory and processing speed, (4) verbal memory and learning, and (5) visual-spatial memory and learning. Small-to-moderate effect sizes emerged for all domains. Similarly to previous comparisons between unselected, drug-naïve and first-episode schizophrenia samples v. healthy controls in the literature, the largest effect size was observed in verbal memory and learning [dl = -0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.29 to -0.76; z = 4.42; p < 0.001]. A sub-analysis of language-related functions, extracted from across the primary domains, yielded a comparable effect size (dl = -0.53, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.23; z = 3.45; p < 0.001). Manipulating our sampling strategy to include or exclude samples selected for clozapine response did not affect the pattern of findings. Our findings are discussed in relation to possible aetiological contributions to TRS.

Clozapine induces metformin-resistant prediabetes/diabetes that is associated with poor clinical efficacy in patients with early treatment-resistant schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Two distinct subtypes of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) have been recently reported, including early-treatment resistance (E-TR) and late-treatment resistance (L-TR). This study was to assess clozapine-induced metformin-resistant prediabetes/diabetes and its correlation with clinical efficacy in schizophrenia E-TR subtype.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study enrolled 230 patients with schizophrenia E-TR subtype and they were treated with adequate doses of clozapine for 16 weeks, during which patients with prediabetes/diabetes were assigned to receive add-on metformin. The main outcomes and measures included incidence of clozapine-induced prediabetes/diabetes and metformin-resistant prediabetes/diabetes, and the efficacy of clozapine as assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score.

RESULTS

Clozapine-induced prediabetes/diabetes occurred in 76.52% of patients (170 prediabetes and 6 diabetes), of which the blood sugar of 43 (24.43%) patients was controlled with metformin. Despite add-on metformin, 47.06% (74/170) of prediabetes patients progressed to diabetes. In total, the incidence of clozapine-induced metformin-resistant prediabetes/diabetes was 75.57% (133/176). On completion of 16-week clozapine treatment, 16.52% (38/230) patients showed clinical improvement with PANSS scores of ≥50% declining. Furthermore, clozapine-induced prediabetes/diabetes was significantly correlated with the poor clinical efficacy of clozapine for schizophrenia E-TR subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of clozapine-induced metformin-resistant prediabetes/diabetes was considerably high in the schizophrenia E-TR subtype. Clozapine-induced metformin-resistant prediabetes/diabetes represents an independent risk factor that adversely affects the clinical efficacy of clozapine for the schizophrenia E-TR subtype. This study provided new evidence for re-evaluating the use of clozapine for TRS, especially E-TR subtype, and the use of metformin for the glycemic control of clozapine-induced prediabetes/diabetes.

Longitudinal course of cognition in schizophrenia: Does treatment resistance play a role?

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) represents a main clinical issue, associated with worse functional outcome and higher healthcare costs. Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for TRS, although 40% of resistant patients, defined as ultra-treatment resistant (UTR), are clozapine-refractory. Previous literature suggests that TRS is characterized by worse cognitive functioning and a more disrupted neurobiological substrate, but only few studies focused on UTR schizophrenia. Moreover, despite this evidence and the central role of cognition, to date no study has investigated long-term cognitive outcome in TRS. Based on these premises, this study aims to analyze cross-sectional and long-term cognitive functioning of patients with schizophrenia, stratified according to antipsychotic response: first-line responders (FLRs), clozapine responders (CRs) and UTRs. We analyzed cross-sectional and retrospective cognitive evaluations of 93 patients with schizophrenia (32 FLRs, 42 CRs, 19 UTRs) over a mean follow-up period of 9 years, also taking into account possible influencing factors such as clinical severity and antipsychotic load. Analyses showed that UTR is associated with overall impaired cognitive functioning and represents the main predictor of long-term cognitive decline. We observed no significant differences between FLR and CR patients, which showed moderate cognitive improvement over time. This is the first study to report an association of treatment resistance with longitudinal cognitive course in schizophrenia, indicating that UTR is correlated with cognitive decline over time. This decline may either be a consequence of the persistence of psychotic symptoms or depend on a distinct and more disrupted neurobiological substrate affecting both cognition and antipsychotic response.

Cognitive performance in early, treatment-resistant psychosis patients: Could cognitive control play a role in persistent symptoms?

Approximately one third of psychosis patients fail to respond to conventional antipsychotic medication, which exerts its effect via striatal dopamine receptor antagonism. The present study aimed to investigate impaired cognitive control as a potential contributor to persistent positive symptoms in treatment resistant (TR) patients. 52 medicated First Episode Psychosis (FEP) patients (17 TR and 35 non-TR (NTR)) took part in a longitudinal study in which they performed a series of cognitive tasks and a clinical assessment at two timepoints, 12 months apart. Cognitive performance at baseline was compared to that of 39 healthy controls (HC). Across both timepoints, TR patients were significantly more impaired than NTR patients in a task of cognitive control, while performance on tasks of phonological and semantic fluency, working memory and general intelligence did not differ between patient groups. No significant associations were found between cognitive performance and psychotic symptomatology, and no significant performance changes were observed from the first to second timepoint in any of the cognitive tasks within patient groups. The results suggest that compared with NTR patients, TR patients have an exacerbated deficit specific to cognitive control, which is established early in psychotic illness and stabilises in the years following a first episode.

Autistic traits and cognitive profiles of treatment-resistant schizophrenia

The complex pathophysiology of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) includes severe positive symptoms but also other symptom domains. The overlapping psychological profiles of schizophrenia and autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) are not established. We compared TRS patients (n = 30) with schizophrenia patients in remission (RemSZ, n = 28) and ASD patients (n = 28), focusing on both neurodevelopmental aspects and general and social cognitive impairments. The TRS group performed the worst on general neurocognition (measured by the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery) and social cognition (measured by the theory of mind and emotional expression). The RemSZ group performed the best among the three groups. Regarding autistic traits, all measurements by the Autism-Spectrum Quotient/Autism Screening Questionnaire/Pervasive Developmental Disorder Assessment Rating Scale showed that (1) the ASD patients had the highest autistic traits (2) the TRS patients' scores were less severe than the ASD group's, but (3) the overall trends placed the TRS group between the ASD and the RemSZ group. These findings indicate that TRS patients and remitted patients could have distinctive neurodevelopmental and cognitive profiles. Further, the degrees of social cognitive dysfunction and autistic traits in TRS patients could be close to those of ASD patients, suggesting similarities between TRS and ASD.

Lurasidone Improves Psychopathology and Cognition in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

In addition to clozapine, other atypical antipsychotic drugs pharmacologically similar to clozapine, for example, olanzapine, risperidone, and melperone, are also effective in a similar proportion of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) patients, ~40%. The major goal of this study was to compare 2 doses of lurasidone, another atypical antipsychotic drug, and time to improvement in psychopathology and cognition during a 6-month trial in TRS patients.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

The diagnosis of TRS was based on clinical history and lack of improvement in psychopathology during a 6-week open trial of lurasidone 80 mg/d (phase 1). This was followed by a randomized, double-blind, 24-week trial of lurasidone, comparing 80- and 240-mg/d doses (phase 2).

FINDINGS/RESULTS

Significant non-dose-related improvement in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Total and subscales and in 2 of 7 cognitive domains, speed of processing and executive function, were noted. Twenty-eight (41.8%) of 67 patients in the combined sample improved ≥20% in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Total. Of the 28 responders, 19 (67.9%) first reached ≥20% improvement between weeks 6 and 24 during phase 2, including some who had previously failed to respond to clozapine.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Improvement with lurasidone is comparable with those previously reported for clozapine, melperone, olanzapine, and risperidone in TRS patients. In addition, this study demonstrated that 80 mg/d lurasidone, an effective and tolerable dose for non-TRS patients, was also effective in TRS patients but required longer duration of treatment. Direct comparison of lurasidone with clozapine in TRS patients is indicated.

Preliminary examination of the validity of the NIH toolbox cognition battery in treatment-resistant psychosis

Objective: Prior research has suggested that treatment-resistant psychosis (TRP) may be a categorically distinct subtype from treatment-responsive psychotic disorders. However, relatively few studies have investigated the cognitive profile of individuals with TRP. Moreover, no prior studies have investigated the effectiveness of using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NTCB) for assessing cognition among psychiatric inpatients despite its promising efficiency and practicality in such settings. The current study aimed to investigate the validity of the NTCB and the associated cognitive profile of inpatients with TRP.Methods: Participants (N = 38) were administered the NTCB and a neuropsychological test battery. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Routine Assessment of Patient Progress measured psychosis symptomatology and daily functioning, respectively.Results: Results showed deficits relative to normative values in fluid cognitive abilities using the NTCB, as predicted. There was strong convergent validity and adequate divergent validity between the NTCB subtests and corresponding neuropsychological measures, though no NTCB subtest correlated with performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. NTCB performance correlated with positive and disorganized symptoms of psychosis as well as daily functioning.Conclusions: Taken together, the NTCB appears to be a relatively strong tool for cognitive screening among psychiatric inpatients and may be used to identify which patients might benefit from further neuropsychological evaluation.

Neuropsychological function at first episode in treatment-resistant psychosis: findings from the ÆSOP-10 study

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychological investigations can help untangle the aetiological and phenomenological heterogeneity of schizophrenia but have scarcely been employed in the context of treatment-resistant (TR) schizophrenia. No population-based study has examined neuropsychological function in the first-episode of TR psychosis.

METHODS

We report baseline neuropsychological findings from a longitudinal, population-based study of first-episode psychosis, which followed up cases from index admission to 10 years. At the 10-year follow up patients were classified as treatment responsive or TR after reconstructing their entire case histories. Of 145 cases with neuropsychological data at baseline, 113 were classified as treatment responsive, and 32 as TR at the 10-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared with 257 community controls, both case groups showed baseline deficits in three composite neuropsychological scores, derived from principal component analysis: verbal intelligence and fluency, visuospatial ability and executive function, and verbal memory and learning (p values⩽0.001). Compared with treatment responders, TR cases showed deficits in verbal intelligence and fluency, both in the extended psychosis sample (t = -2.32; p = 0.022) and in the schizophrenia diagnostic subgroup (t = -2.49; p = 0.017). Similar relative deficits in the TR cases emerged in sub-/sensitivity analyses excluding patients with delayed-onset treatment resistance (p values<0.01-0.001) and those born outside the UK (p values<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Verbal intelligence and fluency are impaired in patients with TR psychosis compared with those who respond to treatment. This differential is already detectable - at a group level - at the first illness episode, supporting the conceptualisation of TR psychosis as a severe, pathogenically distinct variant, embedded in aberrant neurodevelopmental processes.

Severity in sustained attention impairment and clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Among patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), some exhibited further clozapine resistance (CR). This study aimed to investigate whether greater severity of treatment resistance in schizophrenia is associated with greater impairments in sustained attention.

METHODS

Patients with a DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia were recruited from a psychiatric center in northern Taiwan (April 2010 to October 2010). Both TRS and CR were determined retrospectively from participants' medical records following the consensus guidelines. The patients were divided into three groups: 102 non-TRS, 48 TRS without CR, and 54 TRS with CR. They underwent both undegraded and degraded Continuous Performance Tests (CPT), and their performance scores (d') were standardized against a community sample to derive age-, sex-, and education-adjusted z scores.

RESULTS

The TRS with CR group had significantly lower adjusted z scores of d' on both undegraded and degraded CPTs than the other two groups. Meanwhile, the differences between the TRS without CR group and the non-TRS group were not significant. Multivariable linear regression analyses with adjustment for covariates revealed a trend of gradient impairments on the degraded CPT from non-TRS to TRS without CR and to TRS with CR. The proportions of attentional deficits (an adjusted z score of ≤ - 2.5) on the degraded CPT also exhibited a significant trend, from 36.3% in the non-TRS group to 62.5% in the TRS without CR group and to 83.3% in the TRS with CR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater severity of treatment resistance in schizophrenia was associated with greater impairments in sustained attention, indicating some common vulnerability.

Transcranial direct-current stimulation in ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive neurostimulation treatment, has been reported in a number of sham-controlled studies to show significant improvements in treatment-resistant auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia patients, primarily in ambulatory and higher-functioning patients, but little is known of the effects of tDCS on hospitalized, low-functioning inpatients.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of tDCS for auditory hallucinations in hospitalized ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and to evaluate the effects of tDCS on cognitive functions. We hypothesized that treatment non-response reported in previous tDCS studies may have been due to the insufficient duration of direct-current stimulation.

METHODS

Inpatient participants with DSM-V schizophrenia, long-standing treatment-resistance, and auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) participated in this 4-week sham-controlled, randomized trial. Assessments included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) at baseline and endpoint (at the end of Week 4), and the Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS) administered at baseline, endpoint, and weekly throughout the study. Participants were randomized to receive active vs. sham tDCS treatments twice daily for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight participants were enrolled (tDCS, n = 15; control, n = 13) and 21 participants completed all 4 weeks of the trial. Results showed a significant reduction for the auditory hallucination total score (p ≤ 0.05). We found a 21.9% decrease in AHRS Total Score for the tDCS group and a 12.6% decrease in AHRS Total Score for the control group. Significant reductions in frequency, number of voices over time, length of auditory hallucinations, and overall psychopathology were also observed for the tDCS group. When assessing cognitive functioning, only Working Memory showed improvement for the tDCS group.

CONCLUSION

Although there was only a small improvement noted in auditory hallucination scores for the tDCS group, this improvement was meaningful when compared to no standard treatment of the control group. While this makes the interpretation of clinical significance debatable, it does confirm that tDCS combined with pharmacological intervention can provide clinical gains over pharmacological intervention alone. Therefore, tDCS treatment appears to be effective not only for ambulatory, higher-functioning patients, but also for patients with ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Improving Cognition to Increase Treatment Efficacy in Schizophrenia: Effects of Metabolic Syndrome on Cognitive Remediation's Outcome

Cognitive impairment, typically more severe in treatment resistant patients, is considered a hallmark of schizophrenia and the prime driver of functional disability. Recent evidence suggests that metabolic syndrome may contribute to cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, possibly through shared underlying mechanisms. However, results are still contradictory and no study has so far examined the influence of metabolic syndrome on cognitive outcome after cognitive remediation therapy (CRT). Based on these premises, this study aims to investigate the relationship between metabolic syndrome and cognition, specifically considering cognitive outcome after treatment. Secondary objectives include the analysis of the association between cognitive impairment and psychopathological status and, in a subgroup of patients, the evaluation of the effect of Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Transcription Factor 1 (SREBF-1) rs11868035 genetic polymorphism, previously associated with metabolic alterations, on both cognition and metabolic syndrome. One-hundred seventy-two outpatients with schizophrenia were assessed for metabolic parameters and neurocognitive measures and 138 patients, who completed CRT, were re-evaluated for cognition. A subsample of 51 patients was also genotyped for rs11868035 from peripheral blood sample. Results show a negative impact of metabolic syndrome on executive functions and global cognitive outcome after CRT. Data also revealed a significant effect of SREBF-1 polymorphism, with a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome and worse processing speed performance among G/G homozygous subjects, compared the A allele carriers. Overall these findings support the hypothesis that metabolic alterations may hamper the capacity to restore cognitive deficits, as well as they highlight the need to further explore possible converging mechanisms underlying both cognitive and metabolic dysfunction. At the clinical level, results point to the importance of a comprehensive assessment including the metabolic status of patients and of individualized strategies addressing metabolic dysfunction in order to potentiate treatment outcome in schizophrenia.

Effects of haloperidol, olanzapine, ziprasidone, and PHA-543613 on spatial learning and memory in the Morris water maze test in naïve and MK-801-treated mice

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive impairment is the core symptom of schizophrenia, significantly impacting the functional outcome. Improvement of cognitive function has been an important aspect of the treatment of schizophrenia. Therefore, this study is to demonstrate the effects of first-generation antipsychotic haloperidol, second-generation antipsychotic olanzapine and ziprasidone, and alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist PHA-543613 on spatial learning and memory.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

C57BL/6 mice received intraperitoneal injections of haloperidol (2 mg/kg), olanzapine (2.5 mg/kg), ziprasidone (2 mg/kg), and PHA-543613 (1 mg/kg), and cognitive dysfunctions were induced by MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg). Morris water maze was used for investigating the effects of all agents.

RESULTS

Mk-801 significantly increased the mean escape latency to the platform and decreased the number of platform area crossings. Ziprasidone had no effect on the mean escape latency to platform and the number of platform area crossings in naïve mice, but haloperidol, olanzapine, and PHA-543613 did not. Haloperidol and olanzapine significantly increased the mean escape latency to platform and decreased the number of platform area crossings, while ziprasidone and PHA-543613 did not. All the agents had no effect on swimming speed.

CONCLUSIONS

Ziprasidone and alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist PHA-543613 might be helpful in the treatment of CIAS.

Adjunctive memantine in clozapine-treated refractory schizophrenia: an open-label 1-year extension study

BACKGROUND

In a recent placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover trial (n = 52), significant beneficial effects on memory (d = 0.30) and negative symptoms (d = 0.29) were found after 12 weeks of memantine augmentation in patients with clozapine-refractory schizophrenia. In this open-label 1-year extension study we report the long-term effects and tolerability of memantine add-on therapy to clozapine.

METHOD

Completers of the first trial who experienced beneficial effects during 12 weeks of memantine treatment received memantine for 1 year. Primary endpoints were memory and executive function using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S).

RESULTS

Of 31 randomized controlled trial completers who experienced beneficial effects from memantine, 24 received memantine for 1 year. The small improvement in memory found in the memantine condition in the placebo-controlled trial remained stable in the extension study. Executive function did not improve. After 26 weeks of memantine add-on therapy to clozapine, PANSS negative symptoms (r = 0.53), PANSS positive symptoms (r = 0.50) and PANSS total symptoms (r = 0.54) significantly improved. Even further significant improvement in all these measures was observed between 26 weeks and 52 weeks of memantine, with effect sizes varying from 0.39 to 0.51. CGI-S showed a non-significant moderate improvement at 26 weeks (r = 0.36) and 52 weeks (r = 0.34). Memantine was well tolerated without serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In the 1-year extension phase the favourable effect of adjunctive memantine on memory was sustained and we observed further improvement of negative, positive and overall symptoms in patients with clozapine-treated refractory schizophrenia.