Knowledge and competency standards for specialized cognitive behavior therapy for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder

Editorial: The Durable Long-Term Benefits of Evidence-Based Care for Children and Adolescents With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can be enormously taxing for affected youth and their families; the distress, impairment, and family upheaval that it brings are well documented.1 Both exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and pharmacological interventions are efficacious for reducing symptoms and functional impairment, producing mean effect sizes of g = 1.21 and g = 0.50 respectively.2 These treatments-whether administered alone or in combination-form the backbone of our current suite of interventions. They have helped countless young people to restore functioning and lead healthy, productive lives. Despite this encouraging picture, long-term outcomes for children and adolescents with OCD remain poorly understood. Even for youth who receive high-quality evidence-based care, it is unclear what to expect down the road, and this gap in understanding creates challenges for clinical decision making as well as angst for parents who, quite understandably, want to know what the future holds for their children. Although CBT often is recommended as the frontline intervention for pediatric OCD3 and parents routinely report preferring to begin with nonmedication options,4 data to help patients and families make fully informed treatment decisions are scarce. Most would like to know the long-term outcomes associated with various treatment options, and this is a challenge given that the typical length of follow-up in CBT trials for pediatric OCD is 3 to 6 months-well short of a typical school year. The study by Ivarsson et al.5 is therefore a much-needed advance for the field, offering a first view of long-term outcomes for youth with OCD treated with evidence-based treatments.

Closing the Gap for Children with OCD: A Staged-Care Model of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy with Exposure and Response Prevention

Childhood obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is among the most prevalent and disabling mental health conditions affecting children and adolescents. Although the distress and burden associated with childhood OCD are well documented and empirically supported treatments are available, there remains an unacceptable "treatment gap" and "quality gap" in the provision of services for youth suffering from OCD. The treatment gap represents the large number of children who never receive mental health services for OCD, while the quality gap refers to the children and young people who do access services, but do not receive evidence-based, cognitive behavioural therapy with exposure and response prevention (CBT-ERP). We propose a novel staged-care model of CBT-ERP that aims to improve the treatment access to high-quality CBT-ERP, as well as enhance the treatment outcomes for youth. In staged care, patients receive hierarchically arranged service packages that vary according to the intensity, duration, and mix of treatment options, with provision of care from prevention, early intervention, through to first and second-line treatments. Based on a comprehensive review of the literature on treatment outcomes and predictors of treatments response, we propose a preliminary staging algorithm to determine the level of clinical care, informed by three key determinants: severity of illness, comorbidity, and prior treatment history. The proposed clinical staging model for paediatric OCD prioritises high-quality care for children at all stages and levels of illness, utilising empirically supported CBT-ERP, across multiple modalities, combined with evidence-informed, clinical decision-making heuristics. While informed by evidence, the proposed staging model requires empirical validation before it is ready for prime time.

What Is the Added Benefit of Combining Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Youth with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder? A Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling Meta-Analysis

Background: Treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in children and adolescents frequently involves cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), or their combination. However, how adding CBT to SSRIs affects the trajectory and magnitude of improvement has not been evaluated meta-analytically. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis using weekly data from prospective randomized parallel group trials of CBT and SSRIs in pediatric patients with OCD. Response was modeled for the change in the Child Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) using a Bayesian hierarchical model over 12 weeks. Results: Fourteen studies included pharmacotherapy arms, 4 studies included combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, and 10 studies included a placebo or control arm. The studies included 1146 patients (mean age 12.7 ± 1.3 years, mean 42.1% female). In the logarithmic model of response, statistically significant differences in treatment effects for CBT+SSRI and SSRI monotherapy were observed compared with placebo (SSRI β = -3.59, credible interval [95% CrI]: -4.13 to -3.02, p < 0.001; SSRI+CBT β = -4.07, 95% CrI: -5.05 to -3.04, p < 0.001). Adding CBT to an SSRI produced numerically (but not statistically significantly) greater improvement over 12 weeks. Greater improvement was observed in studies with more boys (p < 0.001), younger patients (p < 0.001), and in studies with greater baseline symptom severity (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In children and adolescents with OCD, compared with placebo, both SSRIs and SSRI+CBT produced early and sustained improvement over 12 weeks, although the improvement was also related to sample characteristics. Longer term studies are needed to determine when the additive benefit of CBT emerges relative to SSRI monotherapy.

An ultra-brief screening scale for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: The OCI-CV-5

BACKGROUND

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is an often disabling and chronic condition that is normally assessed using diagnostic interviews or lengthy self-report questionnaires. This makes routine screening in general health settings impractical, and as a result OCD is often under-(or mis-)recognized. The present study reports on the development of an ultra-brief version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Child Version (OCI-CV) which may be administered routinely as a screener for pediatric OCD.

METHOD

A total of 489 youth diagnosed with OCD, 259 non-clinical controls, and 299 youth with other disorders completed the OCI-CV and other indices of psychopathology. Using item analyses, we extracted five items and examined the measure's factor structure, sensitivity and specificity, and convergent and discriminant validity.

RESULTS

We extracted five items that assess different dimensions of OCD (washing, checking, ordering, obsessing, neutralizing/counting), termed the OCI-CV-5. Results revealed that the measure possesses good to excellent psychometric properties, and a cutoff off (≥2) yielded optimal sensitivity and specificity.

LIMITATIONS

Participants were predominantly White. In addition, more research is needed to examine the OCI-CV-5's test-retest reliability and sensitivity to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The OCI-CV-5 shows promise as an ultra-brief self-report screener for identifying OCD in youth when in-depth assessment is unfeasible.

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: 2021 Update

In this update of a previous review, the authors discuss cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) with exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This efficacious modality avoids side effects common to psychotropic medication and reduces risk of relapse once treatment has ended. Psychotherapy involves identification and ranking of stimuli that provoke obsessions, exposure to these stimuli while preventing compulsions, and cognitive restructuring. The family of the OCD patient plays a significant role in treatment. This article includes expanded research on family-focused CBT and treatment of pediatric OCD. The family's accommodation and emotional response to a patient's symptoms may interfere with therapy and perpetuate the disorder. The treatment of pediatric OCD involves the same considerations. However, the form of obsessions and compulsions may differ and therapeutic techniques are modified to make them age appropriate.

Specialty knowledge and competency standards for pharmacotherapy for adult obsessive-compulsive disorder

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects approximately one person in 40 and causes substantial suffering. Evidence-based treatments can benefit many; however, optimal treatment can be difficult to access. Diagnosis is frequently delayed, and pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions often fail to follow evidence-based guidelines. To ameliorate this distressing situation, the International OCD Accreditation Task Force of the Canadian Institute for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders has developed knowledge and competency standards for specialized treatments for OCD through the lifespan. These are foundational to evidence-based practice and will form the basis for upcoming ATF development of certification/accreditation programs. Here, we present specialty standards for the pharmacological treatment of adult OCD. We emphasize the importance of integrating pharmacotherapy with clear diagnosis, appreciation of complicating factors, and evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapy. Clear evidence exists to inform first- and second-line pharmacological treatments. In disease refractory to these initial efforts, multiple strategies have been investigated, but the evidence is more equivocal. These standards summarize this limited evidence to give the specialist practitioner a solid basis on which to make difficult decisions in complex cases. It is hoped that further research will lead to development of a clear, multi-step treatment algorithm to support each step in clinical decision-making.