1
|
Dykstra M, Thompson J, Aldous J, Jiang S, Hughes T, Hayman J, Dragovic A, Shah J, Chang A, Speers C, Sabel M, Dossett L, Schipper M, Jagsi R. The Effect of Wire Versus Magnetic Seed Localization on Lumpectomy Cavity Size. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e255-e263. [PMID: 38161002 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to assess whether an association exists between surgical localization technique and lumpectomy cavity size on radiation therapy planning computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS AND MATERIALS A single-institution retrospective review was conducted of women undergoing breast conserving surgery with wire or magnetic seed guided lumpectomy followed by adjuvant radiation therapy from 2018 to 2021. Patients of a surgeon only performing 1 localization technique or undergoing bracketed localization were excluded. The primary outcome was lumpectomy cavity size on simulation CT. Confounding due to imbalance in patient and tumor factors was addressed with overlap weights derived from a propensity score analysis and used in a weighted multivariable analysis. Secondary outcomes included positive margins, total pathologic volume, boost delivery, and boost modality. RESULTS Of 617 women who received lumpectomy during the study period, 387 were included in final analysis. Tumors of patients undergoing seed localization were more likely unifocal, assessable by ultrasound, and smaller. Seed use rates ranged from 27.7% to 70.7% per surgeon. There was no difference in positive margins (6.4 vs 5.4%, P = .79) or second surgeries (9.4 vs 8.1%, P = .79) between groups. Close margin rates were similar for ductal carcinoma in situ (P = .35) and invasive carcinoma (P = .97). In unadjusted bivariable analyses, wire localization was associated with larger total pathology volume (P = .004), but localization technique showed no association with CT cavity volume (P = .15). After adjusting for potentially confounding variables, multivariable analysis failed to show an association between localization technique and either CT cavity (P = .35) or total path volume (P = .08). There was no difference in indicated-boost delivery (P = .15) or electron boost (P = .14) by localization technique. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in CT cavity size by localization technique, suggesting choice between surgical techniques does not impede radiation therapy boost delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Dykstra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jessica Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Corewell Health Medical Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - Jessica Aldous
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Shannon Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Tasha Hughes
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - James Hayman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Aleksandar Dragovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jennifer Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Alfred Chang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Corey Speers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael Sabel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lesly Dossett
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew Schipper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cavalcante LG, Domingues RAR, Junior BDO, Fernandes MAR, Pessoa EC, Abbade LPF. Incidence of radiodermatitis and factors associated with its severity in women with breast cancer: a cohort study. An Bras Dermatol 2024; 99:57-65. [PMID: 37657957 DOI: 10.1016/j.abd.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the main adverse reactions of adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer is radiodermatitis. OBJECTIVE To assess the incidence of radiodermatitis in women with breast cancer, identify factors associated with its severity and determine the time at which this event occurs. METHODS Prospective cohort study in 113 women with breast cancer who were evaluated before radiotherapy and at every fifth session until the end of treatment. Logistic regression and Cox proportional regression model were used for the assessment of risk factors; P values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS The incidence rate of radiodermatitis was 98.2% and it was demonstrated that for each additional point of the Body Mass Index (BMI), the chance of occurrence of grades II to IV radiodermatitis increases by 14% (OR=1.14 [95% CI 1.04-1.26]; p=0.004) and statin use increases the risk of more severe skin lesions by four-fold (OR=4.27 [95% CI 1.11-16.42]; p=0.035). The exclusive use of hydrogel for skin hydration was an independent factor in delaying the onset of radiodermatitis (HR=0.55 [95% CI 0.36-0.82]; p=0.004). STUDY LIMITATIONS The main limitation of this study was its external validity. The identified factors should be considered for services and populations similar to those in this study. CONCLUSIONS There was a high incidence of radiodermatitis and its severity was related to higher BMI, statin use; there was a protective effect of hydrogel use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loren Giagio Cavalcante
- Department of Nursing, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil; Sector of Radiotherapy, Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Marco Antônio Rodrigues Fernandes
- Department of Infectology, Dermatology, Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Carvalho Pessoa
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| | - Luciana Patrícia Fernandes Abbade
- Department of Infectology, Dermatology, Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kubo T, Kurokawa C, Inoue T, Fujii T, Miyaura K, Shinjo H, Kagami Y, Shikama N. Analysis of applicator displacement in accelerated partial breast irradiation using a strut-based design brachytherapy applicator. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:655-664. [PMID: 37455152 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to identify factors associated with strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) displacement in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using a SAVI device. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively analyzed computed tomography scans taken at the time of treatment planning and immediately before treatment in 61 patients (median age; 55 years, range; 40-85) treated with SAVI and determined the amount of SAVI displacement that occurred between the time from planning to the treatment. The displacement was calculated for the CT axis and SAVI axis, which is related to the SAVI structure. To investigate the cause of the displacement, multivariate analysis was performed on the calculated standard deviation and the insertion angle of SAVI with respect to the sternum in each cross-section, breast density, amount of air around the SAVI, and SAVI length inside the patient to obtain the β coefficient (p-value). RESULTS On the CT coordinate system, positive correlations were observed between the SAVI insertion angle and air volume in the lateral (β coefficient:0.255-0.483) and rotational directions (β coefficient:0.341). On the SAVI coordinate system, positive correlations were observed between the SAVI insertion angle and air volume in all lateral (β coefficient:0.270-0.354) and rotational directions (β coefficient:0.294). A negative correlation was observed between the SAVI length inside the patient and the rotational direction (β coefficient: -0.262). CONCLUSION SAVI insertion angle, the amount of the air outside SAVI and SAVI insertion length are factors which affect the displacement of the applicator. From the results, the applicator displacement and rotation must be <3 mm and 10o in order to meet all the dose criteria. Thus, we should be aware of these factors during insertion of the device to avoid the problem in treatment delivery for the APBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadashi Kubo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiotechnology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Chie Kurokawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoki Fujii
- Department of Radiotechnology, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunori Miyaura
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidenori Shinjo
- Division of radiation oncology, Department of Radiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Kagami
- Division of radiation oncology, Department of Radiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoto Shikama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Civil YA, Jonker LW, Groot Koerkamp MPM, Duvivier KM, de Vries R, Oei AL, Slotman BJ, van der Velde S, van den Bongard HJGD. Preoperative Partial Breast Irradiation in Patients with Low-Risk Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Literature. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3263-3279. [PMID: 36869253 PMCID: PMC10175515 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13233-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative instead of standard postoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has the advantage of reducing the irradiated breast volume, toxicity, and number of radiotherapy sessions and can allow tumor downstaging. In this review, we assessed tumor response and clinical outcomes after preoperative PBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review of studies on preoperative PBI in patients with low-risk breast cancer using the databases Ovid Medline, Embase.com, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Scopus (PROSPERO registration CRD42022301435). References of eligible manuscripts were checked for other relevant manuscripts. The primary outcome measure was pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS A total of eight prospective and one retrospective cohort study were identified (n = 359). In up to 42% of the patients, pCR was obtained and this increased after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS (0.5-8 months). After a maximum median follow-up of 5.0 years, three studies on external beam radiotherapy reported low local recurrence rates (0-3%) and overall survival of 97-100%. Acute toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1 skin toxicity (0-34%) and seroma (0-31%). Late toxicity was predominantly fibrosis grade 1 (46-100%) and grade 2 (10-11%). Cosmetic outcome was good to excellent in 78-100% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative PBI showed a higher pCR rate after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS. Mild late toxicity and good oncological and cosmetic outcomes were reported. In the ongoing ABLATIVE-2 trial, BCS is performed at a longer interval of 12 months after preoperative PBI aiming to achieve a higher pCR rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin A Civil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lysanne W Jonker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje P M Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katya M Duvivier
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ralph de Vries
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arlene L Oei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van der Velde
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J G Desirée van den Bongard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dzhugashvili M, Veldeman L, Kirby AM. The role of the radiation therapy breast boost in the 2020s. Breast 2023; 69:299-305. [PMID: 36958070 PMCID: PMC10068257 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Given that most local relapses of breast cancer occur proximal to the original location of the primary, the delivery of additional radiation dose to breast tissue that contained the original primary cancer (known as a "boost") has been a standard of care for some decades. In the context of falling relapse rates, however, it is an appropriate time to re-evaluate the role of the boost. This article reviews the evolution of the radiotherapy boost in breast cancer, discussing who to boost and how to boost in the 2020s, and arguing that, in both cases, less is more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - L Veldeman
- Ghent University/Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - A M Kirby
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Civil YA, Oei AL, Duvivier KM, Bijker N, Meijnen P, Donkers L, Verheijen S, van Kesteren Z, Palacios MA, Schijf LJ, Barbé E, Konings IRHM, -van der Houven van Oordt CWM, Westhoff PG, Meijer HJM, Diepenhorst GMP, Thijssen V, Mouliere F, Slotman BJ, van der Velde S, van den Bongard HJGD. Prediction of pathologic complete response after single-dose MR-guided partial breast irradiation in low-risk breast cancer patients: the ABLATIVE-2 trial-a study protocol. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:419. [PMID: 37161377 PMCID: PMC10169374 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10910-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is standard of care in low-risk breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Pre-operative PBI can result in tumor downstaging and more precise target definition possibly resulting in less treatment-related toxicity. This study aims to assess the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate one year after MR-guided single-dose pre-operative PBI in low-risk breast cancer patients. METHODS The ABLATIVE-2 trial is a multicenter prospective single-arm trial using single-dose ablative PBI in low-risk breast cancer patients. Patients ≥ 50 years with non-lobular invasive breast cancer ≤ 2 cm, grade 1 or 2, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, and tumor-negative sentinel node procedure are eligible. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled. PBI treatment planning will be performed using a radiotherapy planning CT and -MRI in treatment position. The treatment delivery will take place on a conventional or MR-guided linear accelerator. The prescribed radiotherapy dose is a single dose of 20 Gy to the tumor, and 15 Gy to the 2 cm of breast tissue surrounding the tumor. Follow-up MRIs, scheduled at baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after PBI, are combined with liquid biopsies to identify biomarkers for pCR prediction. BCS will be performed 12 months after radiotherapy or after 6 months, if MRI does not show a radiologic complete response. The primary endpoint is the pCR rate after PBI. Secondary endpoints are radiologic response, toxicity, quality of life, cosmetic outcome, patient distress, oncological outcomes, and the evaluation of biomarkers in liquid biopsies and tumor tissue. Patients will be followed up to 10 years after radiation therapy. DISCUSSION This trial will investigate the pathological tumor response after pre-operative single-dose PBI after 12 months in patients with low-risk breast cancer. In comparison with previous trial outcomes, a longer interval between PBI and BCS of 12 months is expected to increase the pCR rate of 42% after 6-8 months. In addition, response monitoring using MRI and biomarkers will help to predict pCR. Accurate pCR prediction will allow omission of surgery in future patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered prospectively on April 28th 2022 at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05350722).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin A. Civil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arlene L. Oei
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Universiteit van Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katya M. Duvivier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Bijker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Meijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lorraine Donkers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Verheijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zdenko van Kesteren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miguel A. Palacios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura J. Schijf
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellis Barbé
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge R. H. M. Konings
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C. Willemien Menke -van der Houven van Oordt
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paulien G. Westhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke J. M. Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gwen M. P. Diepenhorst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Victor Thijssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Florent Mouliere
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J. Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van der Velde
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H. J. G. Desirée van den Bongard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meattini I, de Oliveira Franco R, Salvestrini V, Hijal T. Special issue. De-escalation of loco-regional treatment in breast cancer: Time to find the balance? Partial breast irradiation. Breast 2023; 69:401-409. [PMID: 37116401 PMCID: PMC10163674 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Over the past few decades, remarkable progress has been made in understanding the biology and pathology of breast cancer. A personalized conservative approach has been currently adopted addressing the patient's individual risk of relapse. After postoperative whole breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer, a rate of recurrences outside the initial tumour bed lower than 4% was observed. Thus, the highest benefits of breast irradiation seem to result from the dose delivered to the tissue neighbouring the tumour bed. Nonetheless, reducing treatment morbidity while maintaining radiation therapy's ability to decrease local recurrences is an important challenge in treating patients with radiation therapy. In this regard, strategies such as partial-breast irradiation have been developed to reduce toxicity without compromising oncologic outcomes. According to the national and international published guidelines, clinical oncologists can refer to specific dose/fractionation schedules and eligible criteria. However, there are still some areas of open questions. Breast cancer represents a multidisciplinary paradigm; it should be considered a heterogeneous disease where a "one-treatment-fits-all" approach cannot be considered an appropriate option. This is a wide overview on the main partial breast irradiation advantages, risks, timings, techniques, and available recommendations. We aim to provide practical findings to support clinical decision-making, exploring future perspectives, towards a balance for optimisation of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| | - Rejane de Oliveira Franco
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Tarek Hijal
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Normal, the Radiosensitive, and the Ataxic in the Era of Precision Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246252. [PMID: 36551737 PMCID: PMC9776433 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: radiotherapy is a cornerstone of cancer treatment. When delivering a tumoricidal dose, the risk of severe late toxicities is usually kept below 5% using dose-volume constraints. However, individual radiation sensitivity (iRS) is responsible (with other technical factors) for unexpected toxicities after exposure to a dose that induces no toxicity in the general population. Diagnosing iRS before radiotherapy could avoid unnecessary toxicities in patients with a grossly normal phenotype. Thus, we reviewed iRS diagnostic data and their impact on decision-making processes and the RT workflow; (2) Methods: following a description of radiation toxicities, we conducted a critical review of the current state of the knowledge on individual determinants of cellular/tissue radiation; (3) Results: tremendous advances in technology now allow minimally-invasive genomic, epigenetic and functional testing and a better understanding of iRS. Ongoing large translational studies implement various tests and enriched NTCP models designed to improve the prediction of toxicities. iRS testing could better support informed radiotherapy decisions for individuals with a normal phenotype who experience unusual toxicities. Ethics of medical decisions with an accurate prediction of personalized radiotherapy's risk/benefits and its health economics impact are at stake; (4) Conclusions: iRS testing represents a critical unmet need to design personalized radiotherapy protocols relying on extended NTCP models integrating iRS.
Collapse
|
9
|
Volume matters: Breast induration is associated with irradiated breast volume in the Danish Breast Cancer Group phase III randomized Partial Breast Irradiation trial. Radiother Oncol 2022; 177:231-235. [PMID: 36265685 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The relation between breast induration grade 2-3 at 3 years after radiation therapy and irradiated breast volume was investigated for patients in the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI) trial. METHODS Treatment plan data was obtained from the Danish radiotherapy plan database. Dosimetric parameters for breast and organs at risk were determined. Breast induration data was obtained from the DBCG database. The volume of the whole breast (CTVp_breast) treated to various dose levels was determined for treatment plans in both arms. Logistic regression was used to assess the frequency of induration on breast volume irradiated to ≥40 Gy. RESULTS PBI and WBI was given to 433 and 432 patients, respectively. Median and interquartile ranges (IQR) for CTVp_breast were 710 mL (467-963 mL; PBI) and 666 mL (443-1012 mL; WBI) (p = 0.98). Median and IQR for CTVp_breast treated to ≥40 Gy was 24.9% (18.6-32.6%; PBI) and 59.8% (53.6-68.5%; WBI). Grade 2-3 induration was observed in 5% (PBI) and 10% (WBI) of the patients. A dose-response relationship was established between irradiated breast volume and frequency of breast induration. From the model, 5% and 10% risks of breast induration were observed for ≥40 Gy delivered to CTVp_breast volumes of 177 mL (95%CI, 94-260 mL) and 426 mL (95%CI, 286-567 mL), respectively. CONCLUSION The frequency of breast induration increased significantly with increasing irradiated breast volume, strongly favouring small volumes and PBI. Thus, treated breast volume - not the breast size itself - is the risk factor for induration. This is the first report directly linking the 40 Gy irradiated breast volume to breast induration.
Collapse
|
10
|
Paladino AJ, Pebley K, Kocak M, Krukowski RA, Waters TM, Vidal G, Schwartzberg LS, Curry AN, Graetz I. An examination of health care utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic among women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1403. [PMID: 36419005 PMCID: PMC9684812 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08705-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women undergoing treatment for breast cancer require frequent clinic visits for maintenance of therapy. With COVID-19 causing health care disruptions, it is important to learn about how this population's access to health care has changed. This study compares self-reported health care utilization and changes in factors related to health care access among women treated at a cancer center in the mid-South US before and during the pandemic. METHODS Participants (N = 306) part of a longitudinal study to improve adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) adherence completed pre-intervention baseline surveys about their health care utilization prior to AET initiation. Questions about the impact of COVID-19 were added after the pandemic started assessing financial loss and factors related to care. Participants were categorized into three time periods based on the survey completion date: (1) pre-COVID (December 2018 to March 2020), (2) early COVID (April 2020 - December 2020), and later COVID (January 2021 to June 2021). Negative binomial regression analyses used to compare health care utilization at different phases of the pandemic controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS Adjusted analyses indicated office visits declined from pre-COVID, with an adjusted average of 17.7 visits, to 12.1 visits during the early COVID period (p = 0.01) and 9.9 visits during the later COVID period (p < 0.01). Hospitalizations declined from an adjusted average 0.45 admissions during early COVID to 0.21 during later COVID, after vaccines became available (p = 0.05). Among COVID period participants, the proportion reporting changes/gaps in health insurance coverage increased from 9.5% participants during early-COVID to 14.8% in the later-COVID period (p = 0.05). The proportion reporting financial loss due to the pandemic was similar during both COVID periods (34.3% early- and 37.7% later-COVID, p = 0.72). The proportion of participants reporting delaying care or refilling prescriptions decreased from 15.2% in early-COVID to 4.9% in the later-COVID period (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION COVID-19 caused disruptions to routine health care for women with breast cancer. Patients reported having fewer office visits at the start of the pandemic that continued to decrease even after vaccines were available. Fewer patients reported delaying in-person care as the pandemic progressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Paladino
- grid.267301.10000 0004 0386 9246College of Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Kinsey Pebley
- grid.56061.340000 0000 9560 654XDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Mehmet Kocak
- grid.411781.a0000 0004 0471 9346International School of Medicine, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Istanbul Medipol University, Uskudar, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Rebecca A. Krukowski
- grid.27755.320000 0000 9136 933XDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Teresa M. Waters
- grid.266539.d0000 0004 1936 8438Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY USA
| | - Gregory Vidal
- grid.488536.40000 0004 6013 2320West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Germantown, TN USA
| | - Lee S. Schwartzberg
- grid.488536.40000 0004 6013 2320West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Germantown, TN USA ,Medical Oncology and Hematology, Renown Institute for Cancer, Reno, USA
| | - Andrea N. Curry
- grid.488536.40000 0004 6013 2320West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Germantown, TN USA
| | - Ilana Graetz
- grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Veiga LHS, Vo JB, Curtis RE, Mille MM, Lee C, Ramin C, Bodelon C, Aiello Bowles EJ, Buist DSM, Weinmann S, Feigelson HS, Gierach GL, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Treatment-related thoracic soft tissue sarcomas in US breast cancer survivors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1451-1464. [PMID: 36240805 PMCID: PMC9633446 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00561-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soft tissue sarcoma is a rare but serious side-effect of radiotherapy to treat breast cancer, and rates are increasing in the USA. We evaluated potential co-factors in two complimentary cohorts of US breast cancer survivors. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we sourced data from the Kaiser Permanente (KP) cohort and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 13 registries cohort, both in the USA. The KP cohort included 15 940 women diagnosed with breast cancer from Jan 1, 1990, to Dec 31, 2016, in KP Colorado, KP Northwest (which serves Oregon and Southwest Washington state), or KP Washington, with detailed treatment data and comorbidities (including hypertension and diabetes at or before breast cancer diagnosis) from electronic medical records. The SEER cohort included 457 300 women diagnosed with breast cancer from Jan 1, 1992, to Dec 31, 2016, within the 13 SEER registries across the USA, with initial treatment data (yes vs no or unknown). Eligibility criteria in both cohorts were female breast cancer survivors (stage I-III) aged 20-84 years at diagnosis who had breast cancer surgery, and had survived at least 1 year after breast cancer diagnosis. The outcome of interest was any second thoracic soft tissue sarcoma (angiosarcomas and other subtypes) that developed at least 1 year after breast cancer diagnosis. Risk factors for thoracic soft tissue sarcoma were assessed using multivariable Poisson regression models. FINDINGS In the KP cohort, median follow-up was 9·3 years (IQR 5·7-13·9) and 19 (0·1%) of 15 940 eligible, evaluable women developed a thoracic soft tissue sarcoma (11 angiosarcomas, eight other subtypes). Most (94·7%; 18 of 19) thoracic soft tissue sarcomas occurred in women treated with radiotherapy; thus, radiotherapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing a thoracic soft tissue sarcoma (relative risk [RR] 8·1 [95% CI 1·1-60·4]; p=0·0052), but there was no association with prescribed dose, fractionation, or boost. The RR of angiosarcoma after anthracyclines was 3·6 (95% CI 1·0-13·3; p=0·058). Alkylating agents were associated with an increased risk of developing other sarcomas (RR 7·7 [95% CI 1·2-150·8]; p=0·026). History of hypertension (RR 4·8 [95% CI 1·3-17·6]; p=0·017) and diabetes (5·3 [1·4-20·8]; p=0·036) were each associated with around a five-times increased risk of angiosarcoma. In the SEER cohort, 430 (0·1%) of 457 300 patients had subsequent thoracic soft tissue sarcomas (268 angiosarcomas and 162 other subtypes) after a median follow-up of 8·3 years (IQR 4·3-13·9). Most (77·9%; 335 of 430) cases occurred after radiotherapy; thus, radiotherapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing a thoracic soft tissue sarcoma (RR 3·0 [95% CI 2·4-3·8]; p<0·0001) and, for angiosarcomas, the RR for breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy versus mastectomy plus radiotherapy was 1·9 (1·1-3·3; p=0·012). By 10 years after radiotherapy, the cumulative incidence of thoracic soft tissue sarcoma was 0·21% (95% CI 0·12-0·34) in the KP cohort and 0·15% (95% CI 0·13-0·17) in SEER. INTERPRETATION Radiotherapy was the strongest risk factor for thoracic soft tissue sarcoma in both cohorts. This finding, along with the novel findings for diabetes and hypertension as potential risk factors for angiosarcomas, warrant further investigation as potential targets for prevention strategies and increased surveillance. FUNDING US National Cancer Institute and National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene H S Veiga
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Jacqueline B Vo
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rochelle E Curtis
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Matthew M Mille
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Cody Ramin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Clara Bodelon
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Erin J Aiello Bowles
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Diana S M Buist
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Bernard J Tyson Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Sheila Weinmann
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Heather Spencer Feigelson
- Bernard J Tyson Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA; Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Gretchen L Gierach
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cheng H, Chen L, Huang M, Hou J, Chen Z, Yang X. Hunting down NLRP3 inflammasome: An executioner of radiation-induced injury. Front Immunol 2022; 13:967989. [PMID: 36353625 PMCID: PMC9637992 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.967989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the mainstream treatment modalities for several malignancies. However, radiation-induced injury to surrounding normal tissues limits its efficacy. The NLRP3 inflammasome is an essential mechanism of innate immunity that reacts to challenges from endogenous danger signals and pathological microbes. A growing body of evidence has demonstrated a key role of NLRP3 inflammasome in the pathogenesis of radiation-induced tissue injury. Despite accumulating evidence, the potential value of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the management of radiation-induced tissue injury is not adequately recognized. We conducted a literature review to characterize the relationship between NLRP3 inflammasome and radiation injury. By analyzing recent evidence, we identify NLRP3 inflammasome as one of the executioners of radiation-induced injury, since it responds to the challenges of radiation, induces cell pyroptosis and tissue dysfunction, and initiates non-resolving inflammation and fibrosis. Based on these concepts, we propose early intervention/prevention strategies targeting NLRP3 inflammasome in a radiation context, which may help resolve imperative clinical problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Cheng
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China,Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lingling Chen
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China,Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Minchun Huang
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin Hou
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhifeng Chen
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China,*Correspondence: Xiaojun Yang, ; Zhifeng Chen,
| | - Xiaojun Yang
- Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China,*Correspondence: Xiaojun Yang, ; Zhifeng Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Experimental determination of breast skin dose using volumetric modulated arc therapy and field-in-field treatment techniques. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396922000292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
The use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on the breast has several dosimetric advantages but its impact on skin dose should be evaluated and compared to well-established treatment techniques using tangential fields. The aim of this work is to contrast the skin dose for VMAT and field-in-field (FIF) and to estimate the magnitude of the skin dose involved.
Method:
The skin dose was measured, without build-up, using thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) in breast radiotherapy by an in-house anthropomorphic phantom. Two different treatment techniques were used: FIF and VMAT, based on the planning strategy proposed by Nicolini et al. The dose levels were 4300 cGy, 4600 cGy and 5600 cGy in 20 fractions. In vivo dosimetry with TLD for VMAT was performed for different breast sizes in the same locations as phantom measurements.
Results:
The ipsilateral phantom breast skin dose using both treatment techniques was equivalent. TLD measured doses by the VMAT technique were up to 5% higher than OSLD, although they agree if we consider the geometry uncertainty of the TLD. In accordance with in vivo dosimetry, the mean dose of the ipsilateral breast skin was 62 ± 6% (51%, 75%) relative to the prescribed dose, regardless of the breast size for the volumes considered with this small population (n = 9) as shown by Mann–Whitney U-test (Z = 1·9, 95% confidence). The uncertainty expected in this region due to geometry (volume) changes is up to 9% higher for volumes from 225·9 cc to 968·8 cc. According to the treatment techniques and in vivo dosimetry, the contralateral breast skin dose was 1·0% in FIF and 2·5% in VMAT concerning the prescribed dose.
Conclusion:
There is no difference in skin dosimetry between VMAT and FIF techniques on the ipsilateral breast. It provides useful support for the use of VMAT as a planning technique for breast irradiation. The work describes the importance of quantifying potential differences in skin dosimetry.
Collapse
|
14
|
Factors Associated with Late Local Radiation Toxicity after Post-Operative Breast Irradiation. Breast J 2022; 2022:6745954. [PMID: 35711897 PMCID: PMC9187272 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6745954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose. To assess determinants associated with late local radiation toxicity in patients treated for breast cancer. Methods. A systematic review was performed. All studies reporting ≥2 variables associated with late local radiation toxicity after treatment with postoperative whole breast irradiation were included. Cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and cross-sectional studies were eligible designs. Study characteristics and definitions of determinants and outcome measures were extracted. If possible, the measure of association was extracted. Results. Twenty-one studies were included in this review. Six out of seven studies focused on the association between radiotherapy (boost) dose or irradiated breast volume and late radiation toxicity found significant results. Tumor bed boost was associated with late radiation toxicity, fibrosis, and/or edema in six out of twelve studies. Lower age was associated with late breast toxicity in one study, while in another study, higher age was significantly associated with breast fibrosis. Also, no association between age and late radiation toxicity was found in eight out of twelve studies. Similar inconsistent results were found in the association between late radiation toxicity and other patient-related factors (i.e., breast size, diabetes mellitus) and surgical and systemic treatment-related factors (i.e., complications after surgery, chemotherapy, and time between surgery and radiotherapy). Conclusion. In modern 3D radiotherapy, radiotherapy (boost) dose and volume are—like in 2D radiotherapy—associated with late local radiation toxicity, such as breast fibrosis and edema. Treatment de-escalation, for example, partial breast irradiation in selected patients might be important to decrease late local toxicity without compromising locoregional control and survival.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kowalchuk RO, Corbin KS, Jimenez RB. Particle Therapy for Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041066. [PMID: 35205814 PMCID: PMC8870138 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy has received increasing attention in the treatment of breast cancer due to its unique physical properties that may enhance patient quality of life and reduce the late effects of therapy. In this review, we will examine the rationale for the use of proton and carbon therapy in the treatment of breast cancer and highlight their potential for sparing normal tissue injury. We will discuss the early dosimetric and clinical studies that have been pursued to date in this domain before focusing on the remaining open questions limiting the widespread adoption of particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman O. Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (R.O.K.); (K.S.C.)
| | - Kimberly S. Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (R.O.K.); (K.S.C.)
| | - Rachel B. Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Comparison of breast volume change between oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy and a simultaneous contralateral balancing procedure through the inverted-T scar technique. Arch Plast Surg 2020; 47:583-589. [PMID: 33238346 PMCID: PMC7700853 DOI: 10.5999/aps.2020.01123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy is performed as an additional balancing procedure in patients with large or ptotic breasts who undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Radiation therapy on breasts that have undergone surgery may result in changes in the volume. This study presents a comparative analysis of patients who received post-BCS balancing procedures to determine whether volume changes were larger in breasts that received radiation therapy than on the contralateral side. Methods Thirty-six participants were selected among patients who received BCS using the inverted-T scar technique between September 2012 and July 2017, were followed up for 2 or more years, and had pre-radiation therapy computed tomography images and post-radiation therapy images taken between 12 and 18 months after completion. The average age of the participants was 53.5 years, their average body mass index was 26.62 kg/m2. Results The pre- and post-radiation therapy volumes of the breasts receiving BCS were 666.08±147.48 mL and 649.33±130.35 mL, respectively. In the contralateral breasts, the volume before radiation therapy was 637.69±145.72 mL, which decreased to 628.14±166.41 mL after therapy. The volume ratio of the affected to the contralateral breasts was 1.05±0.10 before radiation therapy and 1.06±0.12 after radiation therapy. Conclusions The ratio of the volume between the two breasts immediately after surgery and at roughly 18 months postoperatively was not significantly different (P=0.98). For these reasons, we recommend a simultaneous single-stage balancing procedure as a reasonable option for patients who require radiation therapy after BCS without concerns regarding volume change.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kaufman CS, Cross MJ, Barone JL, Dekhne NS, Devisetty K, Dilworth JT, Edmonson DA, Eladoumikdachi FG, Gass JS, Hall WH, Hong RL, Kuske RR, Patton BJ, Perelson C, Phillips RF, Smith AB, Smith LA, Tafra L, Lebovic GS. A Three-Dimensional Bioabsorbable Tissue Marker for Volume Replacement and Radiation Planning: A Multicenter Study of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes for 818 Patients with Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:2529-2542. [PMID: 33221977 PMCID: PMC8043870 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09271-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Accurate identification of the tumor bed after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) ensures appropriate radiation to the tumor bed while minimizing normal tissue exposure. The BioZorb® three-dimensional (3D) bioabsorbable tissue marker provides a reliable target for radiation therapy (RT) planning and follow-up evaluation while serving as a scaffold to maintain breast contour. Methods After informed consent, 818 patients (826 breasts) implanted with the BioZorb® at 14 U.S. sites were enrolled in a national registry. All the patients were prospectively followed with the BioZorb® implant after BCS. The data collected at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months included all demographics, treatment parameters, and provider/patient-assessed cosmesis. Results The median follow-up period was 18.2 months (range, 0.2–53.4 months). The 30-day breast infection rate was 0.5 % of the patients (n = 4), and re-excision was performed for 8.1 % of the patients (n = 66), whereas 2.6 % of the patients (n = 21) underwent mastectomy. Two patients (0.2 %) had local recurrence. The patient-reported cosmetic outcomes at 6, 12, and 24 months were rated as good-to-excellent by 92.4 %, 90.6 %, and 87.3 % of the patients, respectively and similarly by the surgeons. The radiation oncologists reported planning of target volume (PTV) reduction for 46.2 % of the patients receiving radiation boost, with PTV reduction most commonly estimated at 30 %. Conclusions This report describes the first large multicenter study of 818 patients implanted with the BioZorb® tissue marker during BCS. Radiation oncologists found that the device yielded reduced PTVs and that both the patients and the surgeons reported good-to-excellent long-term cosmetic outcomes, with low adverse effects. The BioZorb® 3D tissue marker is a safe adjunct to BCS and may add benefits for both surgeons and radiation oncologists. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-09271-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cary S Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. .,Bellingham Regional Breast Center, 2075 Barkley Blvd. Suite 250, Bellingham, WA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David A Edmonson
- Womens Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Jennifer S Gass
- Women and Infants Hospital, Breast Health Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - William H Hall
- Radiation Oncology, PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center, Bellingham, WA, USA
| | - Robert L Hong
- Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington Health System, Arlington, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lorraine Tafra
- Anne Arundel Medical Center, The Breast Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gill GS, Jakubovic RY, Baker J, Button T, Chang J. Dosimetric benefits of gantry‐static couch‐motion (GsCM) technique for breast boost radiation therapy: Reduced dose to organs‐at‐risk and improved dosimetric indices. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:71-81. [PMID: 32627294 PMCID: PMC7497924 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical feasibility and dosimetric benefits of a novel gantry‐static couch‐motion (GsCM) technique for external beam photon boost treatment of lumpectomy cavity in patients with early‐stage breast cancer in comparison to three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D‐CRT), wedge pair in supine position (WPS), and wedge pair in decubitus position (WPD) techniques. A retrospective review was conducted on breast patients (right breast, n = 10 and left breast, n = 10) who received 10 Gy boost after 50 Gy to whole breast. The treatment plans were generated using an isocentric‐based GsCM technique (a VMAT type planning approach) integrating couch rotational motion at static gantry positions. Static fields for each tangential side were merged using a Matlab® script and delivered automatically within the Varian TruebeamTM STx in Developer Mode application as a VMAT arc (wide‐angular medial and short‐angular lateral arcs). The dosimetric accuracy of the plan delivery was evaluated by ion chamber array measurements in phantom. For both right and left breast boost GsCM, 3D‐CRT, WPS, and WPD all provided an adequate coverage to PTV. GsCM significantly reduced the ipsilateral lung V30% for right side (mean, 80%) and left side (mean, 70%). Heart V5% reduced by 90% (mean) for right and 80% (mean) for left side. Ipsilateral breast V50% and mean dose were comparable for all techniques but for GsCM, V100% reduced by 50% (mean) for right and left side. The automated delivery of both arcs was under 2 min as compared to delivering individual fields (30 ± 5 min). The gamma analysis using 2 mm distance to agreement (DTA) and 2% dose difference (DD) was 98 ± 1.5% for all 20 plans. The GsCM technique facilitates coronal plane dose delivery appropriate for deep‐seated breast boost cavities, with sufficient dose conformity of target volume paired with sparing of the OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurtej S. Gill
- Department of Radiation Medicine Center for Advanced Medicine Northwell Health New York NY USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering Stony Brook University New York NY USA
| | - Raphael Y. Jakubovic
- Department of Radiation Medicine Hamilton Health Services Walker Family Cancer Center Ontario CA USA
| | - Jameson Baker
- Department of Radiation Medicine Center for Advanced Medicine Northwell Health New York NY USA
| | - Terry Button
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering Stony Brook University New York NY USA
| | - Jenghwa Chang
- Department of Radiation Medicine Center for Advanced Medicine Northwell Health New York NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Borrelli MR, Patel RA, Adem S, Diaz Deleon NM, Shen AH, Sokol J, Yen S, Chang EY, Nazerali R, Nguyen D, Momeni A, Wang KC, Longaker MT, Wan DC. The antifibrotic adipose-derived stromal cell: Grafted fat enriched with CD74+ adipose-derived stromal cells reduces chronic radiation-induced skin fibrosis. Stem Cells Transl Med 2020; 9:1401-1413. [PMID: 32563212 PMCID: PMC7581454 DOI: 10.1002/sctm.19-0317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Fat grafting can reduce radiation‐induced fibrosis. Improved outcomes are found when fat grafts are enriched with adipose‐derived stromal cells (ASCs), implicating ASCs as key drivers of soft tissue regeneration. We have identified a subpopulation of ASCs positive for CD74 with enhanced antifibrotic effects. Compared to CD74− and unsorted (US) ASCs, CD74+ ASCs have increased expression of hepatocyte growth factor, fibroblast growth factor 2, and transforming growth factor β3 (TGF‐β3) and decreased levels of TGF‐β1. Dermal fibroblasts incubated with conditioned media from CD74+ ASCs produced less collagen upon stimulation, compared to fibroblasts incubated with media from CD74− or US ASCs. Upon transplantation, fat grafts enriched with CD74+ ASCs reduced the stiffness, dermal thickness, and collagen content of overlying skin, and decreased the relative proportions of more fibrotic dermal fibroblasts. Improvements in several extracellular matrix components were also appreciated on immunofluorescent staining. Together these findings indicate CD74+ ASCs have antifibrotic qualities and may play an important role in future strategies to address fibrotic remodeling following radiation‐induced fibrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mimi R Borrelli
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ronak A Patel
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sandeep Adem
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nestor M Diaz Deleon
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Abra H Shen
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jan Sokol
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sara Yen
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Erin Y Chang
- Program in Epithelial Biology, Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Rahim Nazerali
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Dung Nguyen
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Arash Momeni
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kevin C Wang
- Program in Epithelial Biology, Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Michael T Longaker
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Derrick C Wan
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ahn S, Sung K, Kim HJ, Choi YE, Lee YK, Kim JS, Lee SK, Roh JY. Reducing Radiation Dermatitis Using a Film-forming Silicone Gel During Breast Radiotherapy: A Pilot Randomized-controlled Trial. In Vivo 2020; 34:413-422. [PMID: 31882508 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM To evaluate whether topical use of a film-forming silicone gel (StrataXRT®) could reduce radiation dermatitis compared to a moisturizing cream (X-derm®) in patients receiving whole breast radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 56 patients with breast cancer were randomized to use StrataXRT or X-derm. The severity of radiation dermatitis was graded using physiological skin parameters, clinician-assessed visual rating scales and patient-reported symptoms. Changes in these parameters from baseline to 4 weeks post-radiotherapy were evaluated every two weeks. RESULTS Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed different patterns of changes in the erythema index (F=3.609, p=0.008) and melanin index (F=3.475, p=0.015). The post hoc analysis demonstrated a significantly lower erythema index and melanin index in the patients allocated to the StrataXRT group. CONCLUSION The use of StrataXRT can reduce radiation dermatitis with respect to objectively measured physiological skin parameters. The results of the present study will support the feasibility of conducting a larger randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Songmi Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Kihoon Sung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Ju Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Eun Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Kyu Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Soo Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Seul Ki Lee
- Department of Dermatology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo-Young Roh
- Department of Dermatology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Could a Personalized Strategy Using Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation be an Advantage for Elderly Patients? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Multidisciplinary Opinion. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2020; 2020:3928976. [PMID: 32190051 PMCID: PMC7064828 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3928976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction. Elderly patients are underrepresented from a majority of clinical trials and the choice of the best treatment becomes a challenge. The optimal treatment should be personalized and based on a multidisciplinary approach that includes radiation oncologists, surgeons, geriatricians, medical oncologists, social workers, and support services. The global evaluation of the patients and the creation of nomograms may facilitate the definition of long-term treatment benefits minimizing the use of unnecessary therapy. Material and Method. A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library was performed to identify full articles analyzing the efficacy of APBI in elderly patients with breast cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials, and PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews.
Collapse
|
22
|
Shahbazian H, Bakhshali R, Shamsi A, Bagheri A. Dosimetric analysis of breast cancer tumor bed boost: An interstitial brachytherapy vs. external beam radiation therapy comparison for deeply seated tumors. Brachytherapy 2019; 19:264-274. [PMID: 31787575 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To dosimetrically compare interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) vs. EBRT (3DCRT and high-energy electron beams) for deep-seated tumor bed boosts (depth ≥4 cm) in early-stage breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Planning CTs of fifteen left-side breast cancer patients previously treated with MIBT boost chosen for this study. MIBT, 3DCRT (three-field technique), and enface high-energy electron (15-18 MeV) plans retrospectively generated on these images. To minimize intrapatient target contour inconsistency, due to a technical limitation for transferring identical contours from brachytherapy to EBRT planning system, spherical volumes delineated as hypothetical CTVs (CTV-H) (depth ≥4 cm with considering the geometry of the brachytherapy implant) instead of original lumpectomy cavities (which had irregular contours). In EBRT, PTV-H=CTV-H+5 mm. To account for beam penumbra, additional PTV-H to beam-edge margins added (3DCRT = 5 mm; electron = 10 mm). Included organs at risk (OARs) were ipsilateral breast, skin, ribs, lung, and heart. Prescribed dose-fractionations were 12 Gy/3fractions (MIBT) and 16 Gy/8fractions (EBRT) (BED = 24 Gy, breast cancer Alpha/Beta = 4 Gy). Biologically equivalent DVH parameters for all techniques compared. RESULTS Mean CTV-H depth was 6 cm. Normal breast V25%-V100%; skin V10%-V90%; rib V25%-V75%; lung V5%-V25%; heart V10%; mean lung dose; ribs/lung Dmax were lower in MIBT vs. 3CDRT. MIBT reduced breast V25%-V125%; skin V25%-V125%; rib V25%-V75% and V100%; lung V25%-V90%; heart V10%-V50%; skin/ribs/lung Dmax compared to electrons. In contrast, breast V125%-V250% and V175%-V250% were increased in MIBT vs. 3DCRT and electron plans, respectively. Electron plans had the minimum mean heart dose. CONCLUSIONS From a dosimetric point of view, in deeply-seated lumpectomy beds, MIBT boost better protects OARs from exposure to medium and high doses of radiation compared to 3DCRT and high energy electron beams (except more ipsilateral breast hot spots).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hodjatollah Shahbazian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Roksana Bakhshali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Azin Shamsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Ali Bagheri
- Interventional Radiotherapy Ward, Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Borrelli MR, Shen AH, Lee GK, Momeni A, Longaker MT, Wan DC. Radiation-Induced Skin Fibrosis: Pathogenesis, Current Treatment Options, and Emerging Therapeutics. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 83:S59-S64. [PMID: 31513068 PMCID: PMC6746243 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) has become an indispensable part of oncologic treatment protocols for a range of malignancies. However, a serious adverse effect of RT is radiodermatitis; almost 95% of patients develop moderate to severe skin reactions following radiation treatment. In the acute setting, these can be erythema, desquamation, ulceration, and pain. Chronically, soft tissue atrophy, alopecia, and stiffness can be noted. Radiodermatitis can delay oncologic treatment protocols and significantly impair quality of life. There is currently a paucity of effective treatment options and prevention strategies for radiodermatitis. Importantly, recent preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that fat grafting may be of therapeutic benefit, reversing detrimental changes to soft tissue following RT. This review outlines the damaging effects of RT on the skin and soft tissue as well as discusses available treatment options for radiodermatitis. Emerging strategies to mitigate detrimental, chronic radiation-induced changes are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mimi R. Borrelli
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Abra H. Shen
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Gordon K. Lee
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Arash Momeni
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Michael T. Longaker
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Derrick C. Wan
- Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Grendarova P, Roumeliotis M, Quirk S, Lesiuk M, Craighead P, Liu HW, Pinilla J, Wilson J, Bignell K, Phan T, Olivotto IA. One-Year Cosmesis and Fibrosis From ACCEL: Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) Using 27 Gy in 5 Daily Fractions. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:e457-e464. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Revised: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
25
|
Kindts I, Defraene G, Petillion S, Janssen H, Van Limbergen E, Depuydt T, Weltens C. Validation of a normal tissue complication probability model for late unfavourable aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:448-455. [PMID: 30638097 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1548775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for late unfavourable aesthetic outcome (AO) after breast-conserving therapy. MATERIALS/METHODS The BCCT.core software evaluated the AO using standardized photographs of patients treated at the University Hospitals Leuven between April 2015 and April 2016. Dose maps in 2 Gy equivalents were calculated assuming α/β = 3.6 Gy. The discriminating ability of the model was described by the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic curve. A 95% confidence interval (CI) of AUC was calculated using 10,000 bootstrap replications. Calibration was evaluated with the calibration plot and Nagelkerke R2. Patients with unfavourable AO at baseline were excluded. Patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were compared between the development and the validation cohort. The prognostic value of the characteristics in the validation cohort was further evaluated in univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS Out of 175 included patients, 166 were evaluated two years after RT and 44 (26.51%) had unfavourable AO. AUC was 0.66 (95% CI 0.56; 0.76). Calibration was moderate with small overestimations at higher risk. When applying all of the univariable significant clinicopathological and dosimetrical variables from the validation cohort in a multivariable model, the presence of a seroma and V45 were selected as significant risk factors for unfavourable AO (Odds Ratio 4.40 (95% CI 1.96; 9.86) and 1.14 (95% CI 1.03; 1.27), p-value <.001 and .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The NTCP model for unfavourable AO shows a moderate discrimination and calibration in the present prospective validation cohort with a small overestimation in the high risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Kindts
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gilles Defraene
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Saskia Petillion
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Janssen
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caroline Weltens
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Monten C, Veldeman L, Vandecasteele K, Oltéanu L, De Gersem W, Vercauteren T, Mulliez T, Van Den Broecke R, Depypere H, De Neve W, Lievens Y. External partial breast irradiation in prone position: how to improve accuracy? Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1339-1345. [PMID: 29873283 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1481294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In view of the limited incremental benefit between whole breast irradiation (WBI), accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and omission of radiotherapy in favorable early-stage breast cancer (ESBC), APBI can only be justified if it combines adequate target coverage with the lowest achievable toxicity. Interobserver exercises demonstrated the difficulty of precise target delineation, especially in prone position; information on accuracy is even scarcer. We tested the impact of inserting an additional indicator clip, marking the depth of the tumor in the breast, and the added value of a preoperative CT in treatment position on precision and accuracy. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 12 patients, tumor bed delineation was performed by four radiation oncologists, with CTVstandard (clinical target volume) based on standard delineation guidelines, CTVclip resulting from a 1-2-cm symmetrical expansion with the indicator clip as center and CTVclip_CT expanding from the midpoint between the indicator clip and preoperative gross tumor volume (GTV) as center. Precision was measured as the mean pairwise Jaccard index (JIpairs) between observers, accuracy as the mean overlap between GTV and respective CTVs. RESULTS JIpairs was 0.38 for CTVstandard, 0.75 for CTVclip and 0.59 for CTVclip_CT. Overlap rate of GTV with CTVs was respectively 0.48, 0.67 and improved further to 0.88 for CTVclip_CT. High-dose coverage of GTV (D95 and D90) improved with an indicator clip, but the most optimal result was reached when preoperative CT was added. CONCLUSIONS If EB-APBI in prone position is aimed for, an indicator clip intended to mark the depth of the tumor increases the probability of accurate target coverage, but cannot entirely replace the added value of a preoperative CT in treatment position. Avoiding the cost and effort of such CT implies a risk of missing the target, especially when small volumes are aimed for. Increasing target volumes to reduces this risk, questions the concept of APBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Monten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Liv Veldeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | | | - Luiza Oltéanu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Werner De Gersem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Tom Vercauteren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Thomas Mulliez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | | | - Herman Depypere
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lischalk JW, Chen H, Repka MC, Campbell LD, Obayomi-Davies O, Kataria S, Kole TP, Rudra S, Collins BT. Definitive hypofractionated radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer: Dosimetric feasibility of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and proton beam therapy for intact breast tumors. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 3:447-457. [PMID: 30202812 PMCID: PMC6128030 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Few definitive treatment options exist for elderly patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer who are medically inoperable or refuse surgery. Historical data suggest very poor local control with hormone therapy alone. We examined the dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionated radiation therapy using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and proton beam therapy (PBT) as a means of definitive treatment for early stage breast cancer. Methods and Materials Fifteen patients with biopsy-proven early stage breast cancer with a clinically visible tumor on preoperative computed tomography scans were identified. Gross tumor volumes were contoured and correlated with known biopsy-proven malignancy on prior imaging. Treatment margins were created on the basis of set-up uncertainty and image guidance capabilities of the three radiation modalities analyzed (3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy [3D-CRT], SABR, and PBT) to deliver a total dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Dose volume histograms were analyzed and compared between treatment techniques. Results The median planning target volume (PTV) for SABR, PBT, and 3-dimensional CRT was 11.91, 21.03, and 45.08 cm3, respectively, and were significantly different (P < .0001) between treatment modalities. Overall target coverage of gross tumor and clinical target volumes was excellent with all three modalities. Both SABR and PBT demonstrated significant dosimetric improvements, each in its own unique manner, relative to 3D-CRT. Dose constraints to normal structures including ipsilateral/contralateral breast, bilateral lungs, and heart were all consistently achieved using SABR and PBT. However, skin or chest wall dose constraints were exceeded in some cases for both SABR and PBT plans and was dictated by the anatomic location of the tumor. Conclusions Definitive hypofractionated radiation therapy using SABR and PBT appears to be dosimetrically feasible for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. The anatomical location of the tumor relative to the skin and chest wall appears to be the primary limiting dosimetric factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Michael C Repka
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Lloyd D Campbell
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Olusola Obayomi-Davies
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Shaan Kataria
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Thomas P Kole
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Sonali Rudra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hu JJ, Urbanic JJ, Case LD, Takita C, Wright JL, Brown DR, Langefeld CD, Lively MO, Mitchell SE, Thakrar A, Bryant D, Baglan K, Strasser J, Baez-Diaz L, Lesser GJ, Shaw EG. Association Between Inflammatory Biomarker C-Reactive Protein and Radiotherapy-Induced Early Adverse Skin Reactions in a Multiracial/Ethnic Breast Cancer Population. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2473-2482. [PMID: 29989859 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.77.1790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study examined an inflammatory biomarker, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), in radiotherapy (RT)-induced early adverse skin reactions or toxicities in breast cancer. Patients and Methods Between 2011 and 2013, 1,000 patients with breast cancer who underwent RT were evaluated prospectively for skin toxicities through the National Cancer Institute-funded Wake Forest University Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base. Pre- and post-RT plasma hsCRP levels and Oncology Nursing Society skin toxicity criteria (0 to 6) were used to assess RT-induced skin toxicities. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied to ascertain the associations between hsCRP and RT-induced skin toxicities after adjusting for potential confounders. Results The study comprised 623 white, 280 African American, 64 Asian/Pacific Islander, and 33 other race patients; 24% of the patients were Hispanic, and 47% were obese. Approximately 42% and 15% of patients developed RT-induced grade 3+ and 4+ skin toxicities, respectively. The hsCRP levels differed significantly by race and body mass index but not by ethnicity. In multivariable analysis, grade 4+ skin toxicity was significantly associated with obesity (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% CI, 1.41 to 3.34], post-RT hsCRP ≥ 4.11 mg/L (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.44), and both factors combined (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.18 to 6.14). Above-median post-RT hsCRP (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.63), and change in hsCRP (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.42 to 5.54) were significantly associated with grade 4+ skin toxicity in nonobese patients. Conclusion This large prospective study is the first to our knowledge of hsCRP as an inflammatory biomarker in RT-induced skin toxicities in breast cancer. We demonstrate that nonobese patients with elevated RT-related change in hsCRP levels have a significantly increased risk of grade 4+ skin toxicity. The outcomes may help to predict RT responses and guide decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J Hu
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - James J Urbanic
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - L Doug Case
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Cristiane Takita
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Jean L Wright
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Doris R Brown
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Carl D Langefeld
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Mark O Lively
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Sandra E Mitchell
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Anu Thakrar
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - David Bryant
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Kathy Baglan
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Jon Strasser
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Luis Baez-Diaz
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Glenn J Lesser
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Edward G Shaw
- Jennifer J. Hu and Cristiane Takita, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; James J. Urbanic, University of California, San Diego, Encinitas, CA; L. Doug Case, Doris R. Brown, Carl D. Langefeld, Mark O. Lively, Glenn J. Lesser, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Sandra E. Mitchell, Randolph Cancer Center Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Asheboro, NC; Jean L. Wright, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Anu Thakrar, John H Stroger, Jr Hospital of Cook County Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program (MBCCOP), Chicago, IL; David Bryant, Cancer Center of Kansas/Wichita CCOP, Wichita, KS; Kathy Baglan, St Louis-Cape Girardeau CCOP, St Louis, MO; Jon Strasser, Delaware/Christiana Care Health Services CCOP, Newark, DE; and Luis Baez-Diaz, San Juan MBCCOP, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Demonstration of simulated annealing optimization for permanent breast seed implant treatment planning. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:615-620. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2017] [Revised: 12/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
30
|
Evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) by use of replanning the tumor bed boost with repeated computed tomography (CT) simulation after whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast cancer patients having clinically evident seroma. Jpn J Radiol 2018; 36:401-406. [PMID: 29623550 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-018-0735-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to evaluate adaptive radiotherapy (ART) by use of replanning the tumor bed boost with repeated computed tomography (CT) simulation after whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast cancer patients having clinically evident seroma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-eight patients with clinically evident seroma at the time of planning CT simulation for WBI were included. Two RT treatment plannings were generated for each patient based on the initial CT simulation and tumor bed boost CT simulation to assess seroma and boost target volume (BTV) changes during WBI. Also, dosimetric impact of ART was analyzed by comparative evaluation of critical organ doses in both RT treatment plannings. RESULTS Median time interval between the two CT simulations was 35 days. Statistically significant reduction was detected in seroma volume and BTV during the conventionally fractionated WBI course along with statistically significant reduction in critical organ doses with ART (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Our data suggest significant benefit of ART by use of replanning the tumor bed boost with repeated CT simulation after WBI for patients with clinically evident seroma.
Collapse
|
31
|
Treatment planning considerations for permanent breast seed implant. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:456-464. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 10/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
32
|
Corbin KS, Mutter RW. Proton therapy for breast cancer: progress & pitfalls. BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT 2018. [DOI: 10.2217/bmt-2018-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
As the number of patients cured from breast cancer increases with improvements in multidisciplinary care, emphasis on reducing late toxicities of treatment has increased, in order to improve long-term quality of life. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a form of radiotherapy that uses particles with unique physical properties that enable treatment delivery with minimal dose deposition beyond the treatment target. Therefore, PBT has emerged as an exciting radiotherapy modality for breast cancer due to the ability to minimize exposure to the heart, lungs, muscle, and bone. Herein, we review the rationale for PBT in breast cancer, potential clinical applications, and the available clinical data supporting its use. We also address some of the technical and logistical challenges and areas of ongoing research that will ultimately establish the role for PBT for breast cancer in the years ahead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly S Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Evaluation of acute skin toxicity in breast radiotherapy with a new quantitative approach. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122:54-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Revised: 09/14/2016] [Accepted: 09/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
34
|
Feasibility evaluation of prone breast irradiation with the Sagittilt© system including residual-intrafractional error assessment. Cancer Radiother 2016; 20:776-782. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Revised: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 05/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
35
|
Teguh DN, Bol Raap R, Struikmans H, Verhoef C, Koppert LB, Koole A, Huang Y, van Hulst RA. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for late radiation-induced tissue toxicity: prospectively patient-reported outcome measures in breast cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:130. [PMID: 27682427 PMCID: PMC5041335 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0700-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study examines patient reported outcome measures of women undergoing hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) after breast-conserving therapy. Method Included were 57 women treated with HBOT for late radiation-induced tissue toxicity (LRITT) referred in the period January 2014-December 2015. HBOT consisted of (on average) 47 sessions. In total, 80 min of 100 % O2 was administered under increased pressure of 2.4 ATA. Quality of life was assessed before and after treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-BR23, and a NRS pain score. Results Fifty-seven women were available for evaluation before and after treatment. Before HBOT, patients had severe complaints of pain in the arm/shoulder (46 %), swollen arm/hand (14 %), difficulty to raise arm or move it sideways (45 %), pain in the area of the affected breast (67 %), swollen area of the affected breast (45 %), oversensitivity of the affected breast (54 %), and skin problems on/in the area of the affected breast (32 %); post HBOT, severe complaints were still experienced in 17, 7, 22, 15, 13, 15, and 11 % of the women, respectively. Differences were all significant. The NRS pain score improved at least 1 point (range 0–10) in 81 % of the patients (p < 0.05). Conclusion In these breast cancer patients treated with HBOT for LRITT, the patient-reported outcomes were positive and improvements were observed. HBOT was a well-tolerated treatment for LRITT and its side-effects were both minimal and reversible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David N Teguh
- Hyperbaar Geneeskundig Centrum Rijswijk, Treubstraat 5a, 2288 EG, Rijswijk, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery/Hyperbaric Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - René Bol Raap
- Hyperbaar Geneeskundig Centrum Rijswijk, Treubstraat 5a, 2288 EG, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Struikmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Radiotherapy Centre West, Medical Centre Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arne Koole
- Hyperbaar Geneeskundig Centrum Rijswijk, Treubstraat 5a, 2288 EG, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
| | - Yadi Huang
- University of Leuven, Leuven, The Netherlands
| | - Rob A van Hulst
- Hyperbaar Geneeskundig Centrum Rijswijk, Treubstraat 5a, 2288 EG, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesiology/Hyperbaric Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Assessment and planning for oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery: a review and a proposed chart. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-016-1221-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
37
|
Lakosi F, Gulyban A, Simoni SBM, Nguyen PV, Cucchiaro S, Seidel L, Janvary L, Nicolas S, Vavassis P, Coucke P. The Influence of Treatment Position (Prone vs. Supine) on Clip Displacement, Seroma, Tumor Bed and Partial Breast Target Volumes: Comparative Study. Pathol Oncol Res 2015; 22:493-500. [PMID: 26676979 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-015-0028-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 12/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
To analyse the displacement of surgical clips in prone (Pr) position and assess the consequences on target volumes and integral dose of partial breast irradiation (PBI). 30 post-lumpectomy breast cancer patients underwent CT imaging in supine (Su) and Pr. Clip displacements were measured by the distances from the clips to a common fix bony reference point. On each dataset, the tumour bed (TB = clips ± seroma), clinical target volume (CTV = TB + 1.5 cm) and planning target volumes (PTV = CTV + 1 cm) for PBI were determined and the volume pairs were compared. Furthermore estimation of integral dose ratio (IDR) within the breast from tangential treatment was performed as the ratio of the irradiated breast volume and the volume encompassing all clips. Clips close to the chest wall (CW) in Su showed significantly less displacement in Pr. The mean volumes of seroma, CTV and PTV were significantly higher in Pr than in Su. The PTV volume difference (Pr-Su) was significantly higher in patients with presence of seroma, deep clips and TB location in the superior-internal-quadrant (SIQ) and at the junction of superior quadrants (jSQ). In a multivariate analysis two factors remained significant: seroma and TB localization in SIQ-jSQ. The IDR was significantly larger in Su than in Pr (7.6 vs. 4.1 p < 0.01). Clip displacements varied considerably with respect to their relative position to the CW. In selected patients Pr position potentially leads to a significant increase in target volumes of PBI. Tangential beam arrangement for PBI should be avoided, not only in Su but in Pr as well in case of clip-based target volume definition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferenc Lakosi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Domain University of Sart Tilman, B.35, B-4000, Liège 1, Belgium.
| | - Akos Gulyban
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Domain University of Sart Tilman, B.35, B-4000, Liège 1, Belgium
| | - Selma Ben-Mustapha Simoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Domain University of Sart Tilman, B.35, B-4000, Liège 1, Belgium
| | - Paul Viet Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Domain University of Sart Tilman, B.35, B-4000, Liège 1, Belgium
| | - Séverine Cucchiaro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Domain University of Sart Tilman, B.35, B-4000, Liège 1, Belgium
| | - Laurence Seidel
- Department of Biostatistics, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Levente Janvary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Debrecen University, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Sophie Nicolas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Domain University of Sart Tilman, B.35, B-4000, Liège 1, Belgium
| | - Peter Vavassis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Philippe Coucke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Domain University of Sart Tilman, B.35, B-4000, Liège 1, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Harris EJ, Mukesh MB, Donovan EM, Kirby AM, Haviland JS, Jena R, Yarnold J, Baker A, Dean J, Eagle S, Mayles H, Griffin C, Perry R, Poynter A, Coles CE, Evans PM. A multicentre study of the evidence for customized margins in photon breast boost radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2015; 89:20150603. [PMID: 26585543 PMCID: PMC4985208 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2015] [Revised: 11/10/2015] [Accepted: 11/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if subsets of patients may benefit from smaller or larger margins when using laser setup and bony anatomy verification of breast tumour bed (TB) boost radiotherapy (RT). METHODS Verification imaging data acquired using cone-beam CT, megavoltage CT or two-dimensional kilovoltage imaging on 218 patients were used (1574 images). TB setup errors for laser-only setup (dlaser) and for bony anatomy verification (dbone) were determined using clips implanted into the TB as a gold standard for the TB position. Cases were grouped by centre-, patient- and treatment-related factors, including breast volume, TB position, seroma visibility and surgical technique. Systematic (Σ) and random (σ) TB setup errors were compared between groups, and TB planning target volume margins (MTB) were calculated. RESULTS For the study population, Σlaser was between 2.8 and 3.4 mm, and Σbone was between 2.2 and 2.6 mm, respectively. Females with larger breasts (p = 0.03), easily visible seroma (p ≤ 0.02) and open surgical technique (p ≤ 0.04) had larger Σlaser. Σbone was larger for females with larger breasts (p = 0.02) and lateral tumours (p = 0.04). Females with medial tumours (p < 0.01) had smaller Σbone. CONCLUSION If clips are not used, margins should be 8 and 10 mm for bony anatomy verification and laser setup, respectively. Individualization of TB margins may be considered based on breast volume, TB and seroma visibility. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Setup accuracy using lasers and bony anatomy is influenced by patient and treatment factors. Some patients may benefit from clip-based image guidance more than others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma J Harris
- Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research Sutton, UK
| | - Mukesh B Mukesh
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Oncology Centre, Colchester Hospital University NHS Trust, Colchester, UK
| | - Ellen M Donovan
- The Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Anna M Kirby
- The Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Joanne S Haviland
- ICR-CTSU, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK
| | - Raj Jena
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - John Yarnold
- Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research Sutton, UK
| | - Angela Baker
- Department of Physics, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| | - June Dean
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sally Eagle
- The Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Helen Mayles
- Department of Physics, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| | | | - Rosalind Perry
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich, UK
| | | | - Charlotte E Coles
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - On behalf of the IMPORT high trialists
- Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research Sutton, UK
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Oncology Centre, Colchester Hospital University NHS Trust, Colchester, UK
- The Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
- ICR-CTSU, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK
- Department of Physics, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich, UK
- Radiotherapy Department, Peterborough City Hospital, UK
- CVSSP, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Donovan EM, Harris EJ, Mukesh MB, Haviland JS, Titley J, Griffin C, Coles CE, Evans PM. The IMPORT HIGH image-guided radiotherapy study: a model for assessing image-guided radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2015; 27:3-5. [PMID: 25445551 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2014] [Accepted: 09/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E M Donovan
- Joint Department of Physics at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E J Harris
- Joint Department of Physics at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M B Mukesh
- Oncology Centre, Colchester Hospital University NHS Trust, Colchester, UK
| | - J S Haviland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - J Titley
- ICR-CTSU, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - C Griffin
- ICR-CTSU, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - C E Coles
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - P M Evans
- Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Marta GN, Macedo CR, Carvalho HDA, Hanna SA, da Silva JLF, Riera R. Accelerated partial irradiation for breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of 8653 women in eight randomized trials. Radiother Oncol 2014; 114:42-9. [PMID: 25480094 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2014] [Revised: 11/04/2014] [Accepted: 11/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is the strategy that allows adjuvant treatment delivery in a shorter period of time in smaller volumes. This study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness and outcomes of APBI in breast cancer compared with whole-breast irradiation (WBI). MATERIAL AND METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of WBI versus APBI. Two authors independently selected and assessed the studies regarding eligibility criteria. RESULTS Eight studies were selected. A total of 8653 patients were randomly assigned for WBI versus APBI. Six studies reported local recurrence outcomes. Two studies were matched in 5 years and only one study for different time of follow-up. Meta-analysis of two trials assessing 1407 participants showed significant difference in the WBI versus APBI group regarding the 5-year local recurrence rate (HR=4.54, 95% CI: 1.78-11.61, p=0.002). Significant difference in favor of WBI for different follow-up times was also found. No differences in nodal recurrence, systemic recurrence, overall survival and mortality rates were observed. CONCLUSIONS APBI is associated with higher local recurrence compared to WBI without compromising other clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brazil; Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Cristiane Rufino Macedo
- Brazilian Cochrane Center and Discipline of Emergency Medicine and Evidence-Based Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo-Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP-EPM), Brazil.
| | - Heloisa de Andrade Carvalho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brazil; Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | | | - Rachel Riera
- Brazilian Cochrane Center and Discipline of Emergency Medicine and Evidence-Based Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo-Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP-EPM), Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Donovan EM, Brooks C, Mitchell RA, Mukesh M, Coles CE, Evans PM, Harris EJ. The effect of image guidance on dose distributions in breast boost radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 26:671-6. [PMID: 24929648 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2013] [Revised: 05/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/08/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To determine the effect of image-guided radiotherapy on the dose distributions in breast boost treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS Computed tomography images from a cohort of 60 patients treated within the IMPORT HIGH trial (CRUK/06/003) were used to create sequential and concomitant boost treatment plans (30 cases each). Two treatment plans were created for each case using tumour bed planning target volume (PTV) margins of 5 mm (achieved with image-guided radiotherapy) and 8 mm (required for bony anatomy verification). Dose data were collected for breast, lung and heart; differences with margin size were tested for statistical significance. RESULTS A median decrease of 29 cm(3) (range 11-193 cm(3)) of breast tissue receiving 95% of the prescribed dose was observed where image-guided radiotherapy margins were used. Decreases in doses to lungs, contralateral breast and heart were modest, but statistically significant (P < 0.01). Plan quality was compromised with the 8 mm PTV margin in one in eight sequential boost plans and one third of concomitant boost plans. Tumour bed PTV coverage was <95% (>91%) of the prescribed dose in 12 cases; in addition, the required partial breast median dose was exceeded in nine concomitant boost cases by 0.5-3.7 Gy. CONCLUSIONS The use of image guidance and, hence, a reduced tumour bed PTV margin, in breast boost radiotherapy resulted in a modest reduction in radiation dose to breast, lung and heart tissues. Reduced margins enabled by image guidance were necessary to discriminate between dose levels to multiple PTVs in the concomitant breast boost plans investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Donovan
- Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
| | - C Brooks
- Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - R A Mitchell
- Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - M Mukesh
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - C E Coles
- Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - P M Evans
- Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - E J Harris
- Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rodriguez-Gil JL, Takita C, Wright J, Reis IM, Zhao W, Lally BE, Hu JJ. Inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein and radiotherapy-induced early adverse skin reactions in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014; 23:1873-83. [PMID: 24917184 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in American women. Postsurgery adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) significantly reduced the local recurrence rate. However, many patients develop early adverse skin reactions (EASR) that impact quality of life and treatment outcomes. METHODS We evaluated an inflammatory biomarker, C-reactive protein (CRP), in predicting RT-induced EASRs in 159 patients with breast cancer undergoing RT. In each patient, we measured pre- and post-RT plasma CRP levels using a highly sensitive ELISA CRP assay. RT-induced EASRs were assessed at weeks 3 and 6 using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (v3.0). Associations between EASRs and CRP levels were assessed using logistic regression models after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS RT-induced grade 2+ EASRs were observed in 8 (5%) and 80 (50%) patients at weeks 3 and 6 (end of RT), respectively. At the end of RT, a significantly higher proportion of African Americans developed grade 3 EASRs (13.8% vs. 2.3% in others); grade 2+ EASRs were significantly associated with: change of CRP > 1 mg/L [odds ratio (OR), 2.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-5.95; P = 0.04], obesity (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.03-4.21; P = 0.04), or combined both factors (OR, 5.21; 95% CI, 1.77-15.38; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION This is the first study to demonstrate that an inflammatory biomarker CRP is associated with RT-induced EASRs, particularly combined with obesity. IMPACT Future larger studies are warranted to validate our findings and facilitate the discovery and development of anti-inflammatory agents to protect normal tissue from RT-induced adverse effects and improve quality of life in patients with breast cancer undergoing RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge L Rodriguez-Gil
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Cristiane Takita
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. Department of Radiation-Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Jean Wright
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. Department of Radiation-Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Isildinha M Reis
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Wei Zhao
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Brian E Lally
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. Department of Radiation-Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Jennifer J Hu
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Deasy JO, Muren LP. Advancing our quantitative understanding of radiotherapy normal tissue morbidity. Acta Oncol 2014; 53:577-9. [PMID: 24724930 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2014.907055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph O Deasy
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pasler M, Lutterbach J, Björnsgard M, Reichmann U, Bartelt S, Georg D. VMAT techniques for lymph node-positive left sided breast cancer. Z Med Phys 2014; 25:104-11. [PMID: 24743059 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2014.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2013] [Revised: 03/06/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the plan quality of two different volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques for lymph node-positive left-sided breast cancer. METHODS Two VMAT plans were generated for 10 lymph node-positive left-sided breast cancer patients: one plan using one single segment of a full rotation, typically an arc segment of 230° (1s-VMAT); and a second plan consisting of 2 small tangential arc segments of about 50° (2s-VMAT). For plan comparison, various dose and dose volume metrics (Dmean, D98%, D2% for target volumes, D2%, Dmean and Vx% for organs at risk (OAR)) were evaluated. RESULTS Both techniques fulfilled both clinical target dose and OAR goals. 1s-VMAT achieved a slightly better homogeneity and better target coverage (D2%= 54.2 ± 0.7 Gy, D98%= 30.3 ± 1.8 Gy) compared to 2s-VMAT (D2%= 55.0 ± 1.1 Gy, D98%= 29.9 ± 1.7 Gy). For geometrical reasons, OAR sparing was noticeable but not significant better using 2s-VMAT, particularly heart and contralateral breast. The heart received a mean dose of 4.4 ± 0.8 Gy using 1s-VMAT and 3.3 ± 1.0 Gy using 2s-VMAT; the contralateral breast received 1.5 ± 0.3 Gy and 0.9 ± 0.3 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A VMAT technique based on two small tangential arc segments enables improved OAR sparing; the differences between the two techniques in target coverage and homogeneity are minor. Patient age and -anatomy must be considered for each individual case when deciding which technique to be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlies Pasler
- Lake Constance Radiation Oncology Center Singen, Friedrichshafen, Germany.
| | | | - Mari Björnsgard
- Lake Constance Radiation Oncology Center Singen, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Ursula Reichmann
- Lake Constance Radiation Oncology Center Singen, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Susanne Bartelt
- Lake Constance Radiation Oncology Center Singen, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiooncology, Medical University Vienna/AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Looking for complementary alternatives to CTCAE for skin toxicity in radiotherapy: quantitative determinations. Clin Transl Oncol 2014; 16:892-7. [PMID: 24643699 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1163-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2014] [Accepted: 02/12/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy (RT) is an essential part of the patient's treatment diagnosed with cancer. Determination of the most common RT secondary effect, the cutaneous toxicity, is usually based on visual rating scales, like Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events with an inherent subjectivity. The aim of this work is to perform an objective method to evaluate the radiodermatitis using a non-invasive imaging technique based on laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective study was performed analysing 1,824 measurements. A LDF was used to measure the cutaneous microcirculation in real time. A basal measurement was taken prior to radiotherapy treatment. To be able to observe the microcirculation changes related to the delivered dose, several sets of measurements were taken in the irradiated area along the RT treatment and in the contralateral non-irradiated area. RESULTS A relative increase in blood flow at all measured points was found in the irradiated area. This relative increase in blood flow increases with the dose administered. In the non-irradiated contralateral area, the relative increase in blood flow is not significant and is independent of the dose administered. After treatment, a decrease in blood flow was detected with a trend towards returning to the baseline measurements. CONCLUSIONS LDF is an objective technique that assesses early radiodermatitis. This method is useful to develop strategies to prevent onset of radiation dermatitis in patients irradiated, such as the modification and individualization of fractionation parameters of the RT. This allows the reduction of radiation morbidities and maintains patient quality of life.
Collapse
|
46
|
Shaitelman SF, Khan AJ, Woodward WA, Arthur DW, Cuttino LW, Bloom ES, Shah C, Freedman GM, Wilkinson JB, Babiera GV, Julian TB, Vicini FA. Shortened radiation therapy schedules for early-stage breast cancer: a review of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation and accelerated partial breast irradiation. Breast J 2014; 20:131-46. [PMID: 24479632 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Breast-conserving therapy consisting of segmental mastectomy followed by whole-breast irradiation (WBI) has become widely accepted as an alternative to mastectomy as a treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer. WBI is typically delivered over the course of 5-6 weeks to the whole breast. Hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation and accelerated partial breast irradiation have developed as alternative radiation techniques for select patients with favorable early-stage breast cancer. These radiation regimens allow for greater patient convenience and the potential for decreased health care costs. We review here the scientific rationale behind delivering a shorter course of radiation therapy using these distinct treatment regimens in this setting as well as an overview of the published data and pending trials comparing these alternative treatment regimens to WBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fahimian B, Yu V, Horst K, Xing L, Hristov D. Trajectory modulated prone breast irradiation: A LINAC-based technique combining intensity modulated delivery and motion of the couch. Radiother Oncol 2013; 109:475-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2012] [Revised: 10/16/2013] [Accepted: 10/19/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
48
|
Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) parameters for breast fibrosis: pooled results from two randomised trials. Radiother Oncol 2013; 108:293-8. [PMID: 23953408 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2013] [Revised: 07/04/2013] [Accepted: 07/14/2013] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The dose-volume effect of radiation therapy on breast tissue is poorly understood. We estimate NTCP parameters for breast fibrosis after external beam radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We pooled individual patient data of 5856 patients from 2 trials including whole breast irradiation followed with or without a boost. A two-compartment dose volume histogram model was used with boost volume as the first compartment and the remaining breast volume as second compartment. Results from START-pilot trial (n=1410) were used to test the predicted models. RESULTS 26.8% patients in the Cambridge trial (5 years) and 20.7% patients in the EORTC trial (10 years) developed moderate-severe breast fibrosis. The best fit NTCP parameters were BEUD3(50)=136.4 Gy, γ50=0.9 and n=0.011 for the Niemierko model and BEUD3(50)=132 Gy, m=0.35 and n=0.012 for the Lyman Kutcher Burman model. The observed rates of fibrosis in the START-pilot trial agreed well with the predicted rates. CONCLUSIONS This large multi-centre pooled study suggests that the effect of volume parameter is small and the maximum RT dose is the most important parameter to influence breast fibrosis. A small value of volume parameter 'n' does not fit with the hypothesis that breast tissue is a parallel organ. However, this may reflect limitations in our current scoring system of fibrosis.
Collapse
|
49
|
van Heijst TCF, den Hartogh MD, Lagendijk JJW, van den Bongard HJGD, van Asselen B. MR-guided breast radiotherapy: feasibility and magnetic-field impact on skin dose. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58:5917-30. [PMID: 23920343 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/17/5917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The UMC Utrecht MRI/linac (MRL) design provides image guidance with high soft-tissue contrast, directly during radiotherapy (RT). Breast cancer patients are a potential group to benefit from better guidance in the MRL. However, due to the electron return effect, the skin dose can be increased in presence of a magnetic field. Since large skin areas are generally involved in breast RT, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects on the skin dose, for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). In ten patients with early-stage breast cancer, targets and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated on postoperative CT scans co-registered with MRI. The OARs included the skin, comprising the first 5 mm of ipsilateral-breast tissue, plus extensions. Three intensity-modulated RT techniques were considered (2× WBI, 1× APBI). Individual beam geometries were used for all patients. Specially developed MRL treatment-planning software was used. Acceptable plans were generated for 0 T, 0.35 T and 1.5 T, using a class solution. The skin dose was augmented in WBI in the presence of a magnetic field, which is a potential drawback, whereas in APBI the induced effects were negligible. This opens possibilities for developing MR-guided partial-breast treatments in the MRL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan C F van Heijst
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Todor D, Becker S, Orton CG. Brachytherapy is better than external beam therapy for partial breast irradiation. Med Phys 2013; 40:080601. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4798227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|