1
|
Wang L, Liu L, Cao Y, Chen X, Liu S, Li X, Han J, Wang Q, Han C. Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) combined with nimotuzumab for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A phase II clinical trial. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:679. [PMID: 38831450 PMCID: PMC11149230 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12427-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of concurrent simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) combined with nimotuzumab in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). METHODS Eligible patients were histologically proven to have locally advanced ESCC, and were unable to tolerate or refuse concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Enrolled patients underwent concurrent SIB-IMRT in combination with nimotuzumab. SIB-IMRT For the planning target volume of clinical target volume (PTV-C), the prescription dose was 50.4 Gy/28fractions, 1.8 Gy/fraction, 5fractions/week, concurrently, the planning target volume of gross tumor (PTV-G) undergone an integrated boost therapy, with a prescription dose of 63 Gy/28fractions, 2.25 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week. Nimotuzumab was administered concurrently with radiotherapy, 200 mg/time, on D1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, with a total accumulation of 1200 mg through intravenous infusion. The primary endpoint of the study was the safety and efficacy of the combined treatment regimen, and the secondary endpoints were 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year local control and survival outcomes. RESULTS (1) From December 2018 to August 2021, 35 patients with stage II-IVA ESCC were enrolled and 34 patients completed the full course of radiotherapy and the intravenous infusion of full-dose nimotuzumab. The overall completion rate of the protocol was 97.1%. (2) No grade 4-5 adverse events occurred in the entire group. The most common treatment-related toxicity was acute radiation esophagitis, with a total incidence of 68.6% (24/35). The incidence of grade 2 and 3 acute esophagitis was 25.7% (9/35) and 17.1% (6/35), respectively. The incidence of acute radiation pneumonitis was 8.6% (3/35), including one case each of Grades 1, 2, and 3 pneumonitis. Adverse events in other systems included decreased blood cells, hypoalbuminemia, electrolyte disturbances, and skin rash. Among these patients, five experienced grade 3 electrolyte disturbances during the treatment period (three with grade 3 hyponatremia and two with grade 3 hypokalemia). (3) Efficacy: The overall CR rate was 22.8%, PR rate was 71.4%, ORR rate was 94.2%, and DCR rate was 97.1%.(4) Local control and survival: The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control (LC) rate, progression-free survival(PFS) rate, and overall survival(OS) rate for the entire group were 85.5%, 75.4%, and 64.9%; 65.7%, 54.1%, and 49.6%; and 77.1%, 62.9%, and 54.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The combination of SIB-IMRT and nimotuzumab for locally advanced esophageal cancer demonstrated good feasibility, safety and efficacy. It offered potential benefits in local control and survival. Acute radiation esophagitis was the primary treatment-related toxicity, which is clinically manageable. This comprehensive treatment approach is worthy of further clinical exploration (ChiCTR1900027936).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Lihong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Yu Cao
- Anti-Cancer Association of Hebei Province, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xiaoxi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Shutang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Xiaoning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Jing Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Chun Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaanders JHAM, Bussink J, Aarntzen EHJG, Braam P, Rütten H, van der Maazen RWM, Verheij M, van den Bosch S. [18F]FDG-PET-Based Personalized Radiotherapy Dose Prescription. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:287-297. [PMID: 37331783 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
PET imaging with 2'-deoxy-2'-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) has become one of the pillars in the management of malignant diseases. It has proven value in diagnostic workup, treatment policy, follow-up, and as prognosticator for outcome. [18F]FDG is widely available and standards have been developed for PET acquisition protocols and quantitative analyses. More recently, [18F]FDG-PET is also starting to be appreciated as a decision aid for treatment personalization. This review focuses on the potential of [18F]FDG-PET for individualized radiotherapy dose prescription. This includes dose painting, gradient dose prescription, and [18F]FDG-PET guided response-adapted dose prescription. The current status, progress, and future expectations of these developments for various tumor types are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes H A M Kaanders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands..
| | - Johan Bussink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik H J G Aarntzen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Pètra Braam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Heidi Rütten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sven van den Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy With Concurrent Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin for Patients With Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 3 Superiority Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1129-1137. [PMID: 36402359 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard dose (SD) of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) remains 50.4 Gy in patients with esophageal cancer; a higher dose, when applied with conventional radiation therapy techniques, increases toxicities without improving survival. We investigated whether a high dose of 59.4 Gy using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) would improve survival without increasing toxicities. METHODS Patients with inoperable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) referred for dCRT were randomly assigned (1:1) to high-dose (HD) IMRT (59.4 Gy) or SD IMRT (50.4 Gy). Chemotherapy consisted of 6 cycles of concurrent weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin and a maximum of 2 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy. Nutritional intervention was implemented for patients with malnutrition on the basis of nutritional screening. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). Analyses were by modified intention to treat. RESULTS Between April 30, 2016, and April 30, 2019, 167 patients were enrolled at 9 participating centers in China. Seventy-one patients in the HD and 73 patients in the SD groups were included in the analysis; 86.8% of the patients completed radiation therapy and 70.1% received 5 or 6 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 36.0 months. The mOS was 28.1 and 26.0 months in the HD and SD arms, respectively (P = .54). A total of 7 treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3 or worse treatment-related toxicities were observed in 62% and 68.5% of the patients in the HD and SD arms, respectively (P = .675). CONCLUSIONS For patients with inoperable thoracic esophageal SCC, a dose of 59.4 Gy did not improve survival compared with the SD of dCRT using IMRT.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang X, Bai H, Li R, Wang L, Zhang W, Liang J, Yuan Z. High versus standard radiation dose of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Radiother Oncol 2023; 180:109463. [PMID: 36642387 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Compare the efficacy and safety of high vs standard radiation dose of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) for esophageal cancer (EC). METHODS AND MATERIALS This meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO, and it was followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing high dose (HD;≥59.4 Gy/1.8 Gy) and standard doses (SD; 50 Gy/2Gy or 50.4 Gy/1.8 Gy) were identified on electronic databases. STATA16.0 was used for statistical analysis. A meta-analysis was performed to compare treatment effect and toxicity. RESULTS Four articles with a total of 1014 patients were finally included. The results showed that the two groups had similar 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates (RR = 1.08, 95 % CI = 0.90-1.30, P = 0.395; RR = 1.07, 95 % CI = 0.95-1.20, P = 0.272; RR = 1.06, 95 % CI = 0.97-1.17, P = 0.184; respectively) and 2-, and 3-year locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) (RR = 0.95, 95 % CI = 0.81-1.10, P = 0.478; RR = 0.97, 95 % CI = 0.85-1.11, P = 0.674; respectively). The HD-RT group had higher grade ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicities (OR = 1.35, 95 % CI = 1.03-1.77, P = 0.029) and treatment-related deaths rates (OR = 1.85, 95 % CI = 1.04-3.28, P = 0.036) compared with the SD-RT group. Results of subgroup analysis also indicated that HD could not bring benefit compared to SD, even with modern radiotherapy techniques. CONCLUSION SD-RT had similar treatment effect but lower Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicities rates compared with the HD-RT. Therefore, SD (50 Gy/2Gy or 50.4 Gy/1.8 Gy) should be considered as the recommended dose in dCCRT for EC. Further RCTs are needed to verify our conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofeng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Hui Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
| | - Rui Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315016, China
| | - Lide Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China.
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cui H, Li Y, Huang W, Lu W, Yi X. Escalation of radiotherapy dose in large locally advanced drug-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors by multi-shell simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated technique: a feasibility study. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:216. [PMID: 36578008 PMCID: PMC9795666 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02179-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resistance to conventional dose schemes and radiotoxicity of healthy tissue is a clinical challenge in the radiation therapy of large locally advanced drug-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (LADR-GIST). This study aimed to assess the feasibility of using multi-shell Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated modality (SIB-IMRT) strategy to provide a safe and effective escalation dose regimen for LADR-GIST. METHODS 7 patients with LADR-GIST were selected in this study. The modified SIB-IMRT plans for all patients were generated by delivering different escalation-dose gradients to four ring shaped regions (shells) within the gross tumor volume (GTV). The doses of the central volume of the tumor (GTVcenter) were escalated up to 70-92.5 Gy (25 fractions), while the doses of planning target volume (PTV) and shell-1 were kept at 50.0 Gy. Based on different escalation-dose gradients, the modified SIB-IMRT plans were divided into four groups (SIB-IMRT groups). For comparison purposes, plans obtained by conventional IMRT technique (Con-IMRT) with 50 Gy (25 fractions) were also generated for all patients (Con-IMRT group). All plans were normalized to cover 95% of the PTV with the prescribed dose of 50.0 Gy. The equivalent uniform dose (EUD), relative equivalent uniform dose (rEUD), dose volume histogram (DVH), dose profile, conformity index (CI) and monitor unit (MU) were evaluated in five groups. The Friedman Test was performed to determine whether there were significant differences (P < 0.05). RESULTS Compared with the Con-IMRT group, the EUD of GTV (EUDGTV) and rEUD of SIB-IMRT groups were improved when escalation-dose gradient was increased, and the improvement became significant when the escalation-dose gradient reached 20% of the prescription dose. The rEUD tended to be stable as the escalation-dose gradient went up to 25% of the prescription dose. There were no significant differences in CIs and DVH metrics for OARs between the Con-IMRT group and any SIB-IMRT group, but the significant differences were observed between the SIB10-IMRT group and the SIB25-IMRT group. For the SIB-IMRT groups, as the dose gradient became steeper in the dose profiles, the higher dose was mainly accumulated in the inner part of GTV accompanied with a higher MU. CONCLUSIONS The proposed multi-shell SIB-IMRT strategy is feasible in dosimetry for LADR-GIST and can acquire higher therapeutic gain without sacrifice of healthy tissues. It appears that the scheme of delivering 20% of the prescribed escalation-dose gradient to the target volume can provide satisfactory dose irradiation for LADR-GIST, and it should be evaluated in future clinical study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haixia Cui
- grid.452206.70000 0004 1758 417XDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016 China
| | - Ying Li
- grid.452206.70000 0004 1758 417XDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016 China
| | - Wei Huang
- grid.452206.70000 0004 1758 417XDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016 China
| | - Wenli Lu
- grid.452206.70000 0004 1758 417XDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016 China
| | - Xin Yi
- grid.452206.70000 0004 1758 417XDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016 China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu W, Zeng C, Wang S, Zhan Y, Huang R, Luo T, Peng G, Wu Y, Qiu Z, Li D, Wu F, Chen C. A combined predicting model for benign esophageal stenosis after simultaneous integrated boost in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (GASTO1072). Front Oncol 2022; 12:1026305. [PMID: 37078004 PMCID: PMC10107369 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1026305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeWe aimed to develop a combined predicting model for benign esophageal stenosis (BES) after simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).MethodsThis study included 65 patients with EC who underwent SIB with chemotherapy. Esophageal stenosis was evaluated using esophagograms and the severity of eating disorders. Risk factors were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Radiomics features were extracted based on contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) before treatment. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used for feature selection and radiomics signature construction. The model’s performance was evaluated using Harrell’s concordance index and receiver operating characteristic curves.ResultsThe patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups according to BES after SIB. The area under the curves of the clinical model, Rad-score, and the combined model were 0.751, 0.820 and 0.864, respectively. In the validation cohort, the AUCs of these three models were 0.854, 0.883 and 0.917, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that there was no deviation from model fitting for the training cohort (p=0.451) and validation cohort (p=0.481). The C-indexes of the nomogram were 0.864 and 0.958 for the training and validation cohort, respectively. The model combined with Rad-score and clinical factors achieved favorable prediction ability.ConclusionDefinitive chemoradiotherapy could alleviate tumor-inducing esophageal stenosis but result in benign stenosis. We constructed and tested a combined predicting model for benign esophageal stenosis after SIB. The nomogram incorporating both radiomics signature and clinical prognostic factors showed favorable predictive accuracy for BES in ESCC patients who received SIB with chemotherapy.Trial registration number and date of registrationRegistered in www.Clinicaltrial.gov, ID: NCT01670409, August 12, 2012
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weitong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jieyang People’s Hospital, Jeiyang, China
| | - Chengbing Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Siyan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Yizhou Zhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Ruihong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Ting Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenshan Central Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shanwei, China
| | - Guobo Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Yanxuan Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Zihan Qiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Derui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Fangcai Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- *Correspondence: Chuangzhen Chen, ; Fangcai Wu,
| | - Chuangzhen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- *Correspondence: Chuangzhen Chen, ; Fangcai Wu,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Han W, Chang X, Zhang W, Yang J, Yu S, Deng W, Ni W, Zhou Z, Chen D, Feng Q, Liang J, Hui Z, Wang L, Gao S, Lin Y, Chen X, Chen J, Xiao Z. Effect of Adjuvant Radiation Dose on Survival in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235879. [PMID: 36497360 PMCID: PMC9736548 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: For patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with surgery alone, the incidence of local-regional recurrence remains unfavorable. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has been associated with increased local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), although its application is limited by concerns of PORT-related toxicities. Methods: Among 3591 patients with ESCC analyzed in this study, 2765 patients with T3-4N0 and T1-4N1-3 lesions and specific local-regional status information were analyzed in a subsequent analysis of adjuvant radiation dose (aRTD) effect. Application of the restricted cubic spline regression model revealed a non-linear relationship between aRTD and survival/radiotoxicity. Linear regression analysis (LRA) was performed to evaluate correlations between LRFS and overall survival (OS)/ disease-free survival (DFS). Results: For patients staged T1−2N0, T1−2N1−3, T3−4N0, and T3−4N1−3, 5-year OS in PORT and non-PORT groups were 77.38% vs. 72.91%, p = 0.919, 52.35% vs. 46.60%, p = 0.032, 73.41% vs. 61.19%, p = 0.005 and 38.30% vs. 25.97%, p < 0.001. With aRTD escalation, hazard ratios (HRs) of OS/DFS declined until aRTD exceeded 50Gy, then increased, whereas that of LRFS declined until aRTD exceeded 50 Gy, then remained steady. HR of treatment-related mortality was stable until aRTD exceeded 50 Gy, then increased. LRA revealed strong correlations between LRFS and OS/DFS (r = 0.984 and r = 0.952, respectively). An absolute 1% advancement in LRFS resulted in 0.32% and 0.34% improvements in OS and DFS. Conclusions: An aRTD of 50Gy was well-tolerated, with favorable survival resulting from PORT-related LRFS improvement in patients staged T3−4N0 or T1-4N1−3. Further stratification analyses based on tumor burden would help determine potential PORT-beneficiaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiming Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Jingsong Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Shufei Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Wei Deng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Ninth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100038, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Dongfu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhouguang Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Lvhua Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Shugeng Gao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China
| | - Xiaohui Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Radiation Dose-Effect Relation in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Center Data and Literature-Based Analysis. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:2438270. [PMID: 36317125 PMCID: PMC9617729 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2438270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Despite receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with radiation dose (RTD) of 50.4 Gy, survival of esophageal carcinoma was dismal. The effect of RTD in cancer control and radiotoxicity, and the extent to which local-regional control (LRC) influenced survival remain vague. This study aimed at evaluating RTD-effect relationship in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods 1440 dRT/CRT-treated ESCC patients were enrolled. Restricted cubic spline regression model was applied to reveal nonlinear relationship between RTD and survival/radiotoxicity. Linear regression analysis (LRA) was performed to evaluate correlations between LRC and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). Results For 1440 dRT/CRT-treated ESCC patients, with RTD escalating, hazard ratios (HRs) of OS, PFS, LRC declined until RTD exceeded 60 Gy, then increased. HR of treatment-related mortality was stable until RTD exceeded 60 Gy, then increased. HR of LRC was lower for majority of patients treated with RTD≥60 Gy, except for those with KPS<80, T1-2 lesion, or without lymph node metastasis. LRA revealed strong correlations between LRC and OS/PFS. 45.5% and 44.9% of OS and PFS improvements were owing to improved LRC. Conclusions RTD of 60 Gy was well tolerated, with favorable survival resulted of LRC improvement in local-advanced ESCC. Further stratification analyses based on radiation sensitivity will be helpful to determine potential beneficiaries of RTD escalation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Boustani J, Créhange G. [Dose-escalated radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A review of the literature]. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:884-889. [PMID: 36008261 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
For non-operable, localized esophageal cancer, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment. Currently, the radiation dose recommended is 50 to 50,4Gy. However, the optimal radiation dose remains controversial. Many studies have demonstrated that locoregional failure remains a common failure pattern, most likely to occur within the original gross tumor volume. Several retrospective studies have indicated that higher radiation dose may improve local control and survival while others failed to demonstrate improved oucomes. In three randomized trials (INT0123, ARTDECO, and CONCORDE), dose escalation did not improve locoregional control nor survival, establishing 50Gy as the standard chemoradiation dose for patients who will not undergo surgery. Here, we reviewed the results of dose escalation in the literature in the neoadjuvant and definitive settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Boustani
- Département de radiothérapie, Centre hospitalo-universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
| | - G Créhange
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gao Q, Liu ZY, Cheng Y, Di XK, Zhang YM, Sun XC, Xia XJ, Ge XL. Prognostic factors for 495 nonoperative esophageal squamous cancer patients receiving IMRT plus chemotherapy: A retrospective analysis. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:1002-1007. [PMID: 35933288 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemoradiotherapy is regarded as a standard scheme for inoperable and unresectable esophageal cancers. Our aims were to explore the prognostic factors relevant to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) following intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plus chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Totally 495 ESCC patients undergoing IMRT combined with chemotherapy in our hospital between 2011 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Potential clinical prognosis-related factors were assessed by uni- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the ESCC patients were 2.25 and 1.24years, respectively. Uni- and multivariate analyses demonstrated the relevant independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS were gender, T stage, N stage, clinical stage, and tumor location (P<0.05), but not chemotherapy or radiotherapy dose. We further compared the 5-year OS rates among different T stages, N stages, clinical stages, genders, and tumor locations. The survival rate at the higher clinical stage was significantly lower (P<0.001). The 5-year OS in the upper thorax of the tumor was 46.0% and exceeded other tumor locations (P<0.05). The 5-year OS was 56.1% among females and 33.3% among males (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS For ESCC patients receiving IMRT combined with chemotherapy, their long-term curative effects are influenced by T stages, N stages, clinical stages, genders, and tumor locations. ESCC patients who are females, or have upper thoracic tumor, or are at early clinical stage own better prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300, Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Z-Y Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital and the Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 168, Gushan Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Y Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, 1-1, Zhongfu Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - X-K Di
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300, Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Y-M Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300, Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - X-C Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300, Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
| | - X-J Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300, Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
| | - X-L Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300, Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhu H, Liu Q, Xu H, Mo M, Wang Z, Lu K, Zhou J, Chen J, Zheng X, Ye J, Ge X, Luo H, Liu Q, Deng J, Ai D, Hao S, Zhang J, Tseng IH, Song S, Chen Y, Zhao K. Dose escalation based on 18F-FDG PET/CT response in definitive chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase III, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (ESO-Shanghai 12). Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:134. [PMID: 35906623 PMCID: PMC9338557 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02099-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Definitive chemoradiotherapy has established the standard non-surgical treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. The standard dose of 50-50.4 Gy has been established decades ago and been confirmed in modern trials. The theorical advantage of better local control and technical advances for less toxicity have encouraged clinicians for dose escalation investigation. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have the potential to tailor therapy for esophageal patients not showing response to CRT and pioneers the PET-based dose escalation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The ESO-Shanghai 12 trial is a prospective multicenter randomized phase 3 study in which patients are randomized to either 61.2 Gy or 50.4 Gy of radiation dose by PET response. Both groups undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel/cisplatin regimen for 2 cycles followed by consolidation chemotherapy for 2 cycles. Patients with histologically confirmed ESCC [T1N1-3M0, T2-4NxM0, TxNxM1 (Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis only), (AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition)] and without any prior treatment of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery against esophageal cancer will be eligible. The primary endpoints included overall survival in PET/CT non-responders (SUVmax > 4.0) and overall survival in total population. Patients will be stratified by standardized uptake volume, gross tumor volume and tumor location. The enrollment could be ended, when the number of PET/CT non-responder reached 132 and the total population reached 646 for randomization. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This trial has been approved by the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Institutional Review Board. Trial results will be disseminated via peer reviewed scientific journals and conference presentations. Trial registration The trial was initiated in 2018 and is currently recruiting patients. Trial registration number NCT03790553.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongcheng Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiufang Liu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Miao Mo
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Cancer Prevention and Statistics, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zezhou Wang
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Cancer Prevention and Statistics, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Kui Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taizhou Second People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jialiang Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiangpeng Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinjun Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaolin Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Honglei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiaying Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Dashan Ai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengnan Hao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Junhua Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - I Hsuan Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaoli Song
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. .,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China.
| | - Kuaile Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. .,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xu Y, Dong B, Zhu W, Li J, Huang R, Sun Z, Yang X, Liu L, He H, Liao Z, Guan N, Kong Y, Wang W, Chen J, He H, Qiu G, Zeng M, Pu J, Hu W, Bao Y, Liu Z, Ma J, Jiang H, Du X, Hu J, Zhuang T, Cai J, Huang J, Tao H, Liu Y, Liang X, Zhou J, Tao G, Zheng X, Chen M. A Phase III Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of 60 Gy versus 50 Gy Radiation Dose in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Inoperable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1792-1799. [PMID: 35190815 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this multicenter phase 3 trial, the efficacy and safety of 60 Gy and 50 Gy doses delivered with modern radiotherapy technology for definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIA‒IVA ESCC were randomized 1:1 to receive conventional fractionated 60 Gy or 50 Gy to the tumor and regional lymph nodes. Concurrent weekly chemotherapy (docetaxel 25 mg/m2; cisplatin 25 mg/m2) and two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy (docetaxel 70 mg/m2; cisplatin 25 mg/m2 days 1‒3) were administered. RESULTS A total of 319 patients were analyzed for survival, and the median follow-up was 34.0 months. The 1- and 3-year locoregional progression-free survival (PFS) rates for the 60 Gy group were 75.6% and 49.5% versus 72.1% and 48.4%, respectively, for the 50 Gy group [HR, 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75‒1.35; P = 0.98]. The overall survival rates were 83.7% and 53.1% versus 84.8% and 52.7%, respectively (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73‒1.35; P = 0.96), whereas the PFS rates were 71.2% and 46.4% versus 65.2% and 46.1%, respectively (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73‒1.30; P = 0.86). The incidence of grade 3+ radiotherapy pneumonitis was higher in the 60 Gy group (nominal P = 0.03) than in the 50 Gy group. CONCLUSIONS The 60 Gy arm had similar survival endpoints but a higher severe pneumonitis rate compared with the 50 Gy arm. Fifty Gy should be considered as the recommended dose in CCRT for ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujin Xu
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Baiqiang Dong
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiguo Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Huai'an, China
| | - Jiancheng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Rong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Zongwen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jining NO.1 people's hospital, Jining, China
| | - Xinmei Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing, China
| | - Liping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jining NO.1 people's hospital, Jining, China
| | - Han He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Taxes, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ni Guan
- Department of Medical Statistics, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Yue Kong
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wanwei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Huai'an, China
| | - Jianxiang Chen
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Huijuan He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China
| | - Guoqin Qiu
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Pu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lianshui People's Hospital, Huai'an, China
| | - Wangyuan Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, China
| | - Yong Bao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhigang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Hao Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China
| | - Xianghui Du
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jin Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Tingting Zhuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Jing Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Jin Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, China
| | - Hua Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Yuan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaodong Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Juying Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Guangzhou Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Huai'an, China
| | - Xiao Zheng
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lan W, Lihong L, Chun H, Shutang L, Qi W, Liang X, Xiaoning L, Likun L. Comparison of efficacy and safety between simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy and standard-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:802-811. [PMID: 35029718 PMCID: PMC9402727 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01894-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) versus standard-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SD-IMRT) in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods From July 2003 to March 2014, 1748 patients in a single center who received definitive chemoradiotherapy were included in the analysis. A total of 109 patients who underwent SIB-IMRT and fulfilled all inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified as the study group. A total of 266 patients who underwent SD-IMRT (60 Gy/30 fractions, 2 Gy/fraction, 1 time/day, 5 times/week) during the same period were selected as the control group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Survival status, treatment failure mode, and the occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups. Results There were more women and more cervical and upper thoracic cancers (P = 0.038, < 0.001, respectively) in the SIB-IMRT group before case matching. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the SD-IMRT and SIB-IMRT groups was 22 and 19 months, respectively, and the median overall survival duration was 24 and 22 months, respectively, with χ2 = 0.244 and P = 0.621. After PSM of 1:1, 138 patients entered the final analysis (69 cases from each group). The median PFS of the SD-IMRT group and the SIB-IMRT group was 13 and 18 months, respectively, with χ2 = 8.776 and P = 0.003. The 1‑, 3‑, and 5‑year overall survival rates were 66.7, 21.7, and 8.7% and 65.2, 36.2, and 27.3%, respectively, and the median overall survival duration was 16 and 22 months, respectively, with χ2 = 5.362 and P = 0.021. Treatment failure mode: 5‑year local regional recurrence rates of SD-IMRT and SIB-IMRT were 50.7 and 36.2%, respectively, with χ2 = 2.949 and P = 0.086. The 5‑year distant metastasis rates of the two groups were 36.2 and 24.6%, respectively, with χ2 = 2.190 and P = 0.139. Adverse events: 3 patients experienced grade 4–5 toxicity (2.2%), including one case of grade 4 radiation esophagitis and two cases of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis, all in the SD-IMRT group; 14 patients experienced grade 3 adverse events (10.1%), primarily including radiation esophagitis, radiation pneumonitis, and hematological toxicity. Conclusion The technique of SIB-IMRT was safe and reliable compared with SD-IMRT. In addition, SIB-IMRT had locoregional control advantages and potential survival benefits. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-021-01894-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang Lan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Liu Lihong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Han Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, China.
| | - Liu Shutang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Wang Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xu Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Li Xiaoning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Liu Likun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 050011, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Créhange G, Modesto A, Vendrely V, Quéro L, Mirabel X, Rétif P, Huguet F. Radiotherapy for cancers of the oesophagus, cardia and stomach. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:250-258. [PMID: 34955417 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
We present the updated recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on radiotherapy of oesophageal cancer. Oesophageal cancer still remains a malignant tumour with a poor prognosis. Surgery remains the standard treatment for localized cancers, regardless of histology. For locally advanced stages, surgery remains a standard for adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, it is a therapeutic option after initial chemoradiotherapy for stage III squamous cell carcinomas, given the increased morbidity and mortality with a multimodal treatment, which results in an equivalent overall survival with or without surgery. Preoperative or exclusive chemoradiotherapy should be delivered according to validated regimens with an effective total dose (50Gy), if surgery is not planned or if the tumour is deemed resectable before chemoradiotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy significantly reduces irradiation of the lungs and heart and may reduce the morbidity of this treatment, especially in combination with surgery. In case of exclusive chemoradiotherapy, dose escalation beyond 50Gy is not currently recommended. Some technical considerations still remain questionable, such as the place of prophylactic lymph node irradiation, adaptive radiotherapy, evaluation of response during and after chemoradiotherapy and the value of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Créhange
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - A Modesto
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Claudius-Regaud, université de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - V Vendrely
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, avenue de Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France
| | - L Quéro
- Service de cancérologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefeaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - X Mirabel
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - P Rétif
- Département of physique médicale, CHRU de Metz, 1, allée du Château, 57085 Metz, France
| | - F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li H, Li J, Li F, Zhang Y, Li Y, Guo Y, Xu L. Geometrical Comparison and Quantitative Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT- and DW-MRI-Based Target Delineation Before and During Radiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:772428. [PMID: 35004291 PMCID: PMC8727588 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the geometrical differences in and metabolic parameters of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) performed before and during radiotherapy (RT) for patients with esophageal cancer based on the three-dimensional CT (3DCT) medium and explore whether the high signal area derived from DW-MRI can be used as a tool for an individualized definition of the volume in need of dose escalation for esophageal squamous cancer. Materials and Methods Thirty-two patients with esophageal squamous cancer sequentially underwent repeated 3DCT, 18F-FDG PET-CT, and enhanced MRI before the initiation of RT and after the 15th fraction. All images were fused with 3DCT images through deformable registration. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated based on PET Edge on the first and second PET-CT images and defined as GTVPETpre and GTVPETdur, respectively. GTVDWIpre and GTVDWIdur were delineated on the first and second DWI and corresponding T2-weighted MRI (T2W-MRI)-fused images. The maximum, mean, and peak standardized uptake values (SUVs; SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak, respectively); metabolic tumor volume (MTV); and total lesion glycolysis(TLG) and its relative changes were calculated automatically on PET. Similarly, the minimum and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC; ADCmin and ADCmean) and its relative changes were measured manually using ADC maps. Results The volume of GTVCT exhibited a significant positive correlation with that of GTVPET and GTVDWI (both p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in both ADCs and 18F-FDG PET metabolic parameters before and during RT (both p < 0.001). No significant correlation was observed between SUVs and ADCs before and during RT (p = 0.072–0.944) and between ∆ADCs and ∆SUVs (p = 0.238–0.854). The conformity index and degree of inclusion of GTVPETpre to GTVDWIpre were significantly higher than those of GTVPETdur to GTVDWIdur (both p < 0.001). The maximum diameter shrinkage rate (∆LDDWI) (24%) and the tumor volume shrinkage rate (VRRDWI) (60%) based on DW-MRI during RT were significantly greater than the corresponding PET-based ∆LDPET (14%) and VRRPET (41%) rates (p = 0.017 and 0.000, respectively). Conclusion Based on the medium of CT images, there are significant differences in spatial position, biometabolic characteristics, and the tumor shrinkage rate for GTVs derived from 18F-FDG PET-CT and DW-MRI before and during RT for esophageal squamous cancer. Further studies are needed to determine if DW-MRI will be used as tool for an individualized definition of the volume in need of dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huimin Li
- Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
- Department of Respiratory and Neurology, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Jianbin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- *Correspondence: Jianbin Li, ; Fengxiang Li,
| | - Fengxiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- *Correspondence: Jianbin Li, ; Fengxiang Li,
| | - Yingjie Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Yankang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Yanluan Guo
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomograph (PET-CT), Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Liang Xu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li C, Tan L, Liu X, Wang X, Zhou Z, Chen D, Feng Q, Liang J, Lv J, Wang X, Bi N, Deng L, Wang W, Zhang T, Ni W, Chang X, Han W, Xiao Z. Definitive Simultaneous Integrated Boost Versus Conventional-Fractionated Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:618776. [PMID: 34235073 PMCID: PMC8256744 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.618776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the effects of simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) and conventional fractionated-IMRT (CF-IMRT) for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS The data of 1173 patients treated with either CF-IMRT or SIB-IMRT for a curative intent from 2005 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create a well-balanced cohort of 687 patients at 1:2 ratio (237 patients in SIB-IMRT group and 450 patients in CF-IMRT group). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence pattern, and toxicity profiles were evaluated and compared between the two groups after PSM. RESULTS After a median follow-up time of 42.3 months (range, 3.0-153.2 months) for surviving patients, survival results were comparable in the two groups. After PSM, the 1-year, 2-year and 4-year OS rates in the SIB-IMRT and CF-IMRT groups were 70.0% vs. 66.4%, 41.9% vs. 41.7% and 30.2% vs. 27.6%, respectively (p = 0.87). The 1-year, 2-year and 4-year PFS rates were 48.4% vs. 49.1%, 31.2% vs. 29.4%, and 26.1% vs. 17.9%, respectively (p = 0.64). Locoregional recurrence (p = 0.32) and distant metastasis (p = 0.54) rates were also comparable between two groups. The toxicity profile was similar in the two groups. Multivariate analyses in the matched samples showed that female, concurrent chemotherapy and earlier clinical stage were independently associated with longer OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS SIB-IMRT appears to be equivalent to CF-IMRT in treatment efficacy and safety, and could become an alternative option for definitive radiotherapy of ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lijun Tan
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical College, Harbin, China
| | - Xiao Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dongfu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen Center, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jima Lv
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaozhen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weiming Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chen D, Menon H, Verma V, Seyedin SN, Ajani JA, Hofstetter WL, Nguyen QN, Chang JY, Gomez DR, Amini A, Swisher SG, Blum MA, Younes AI, Barsoumian HB, Erasmus JJ, Lee JH, Bhutani MS, Hess KR, Minsky BD, Welsh JW. Results of a Phase 1/2 Trial of Chemoradiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Radiotherapy Dose in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2021; 5:1597-1604. [PMID: 31529018 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Importance Effective treatment options for locally advanced esophageal cancer are limited, and rates of local recurrence after standard chemoradiotherapy remain high. Objective To evaluate toxic effects, local control, and overall survival rates after chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose to the gross tumor and nodal disease for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A phase 1/2, single-arm trial was conducted in 46 patients from April 28, 2010, to April 9, 2015 (median follow-up, 52 months [range, 2-86 months]), at a tertiary academic cancer center. Outcomes of the study patients were compared with those of 97 similar patients treated at the same institution from January 10, 2010, to December 5, 2014, as part of the interim analysis. Statistical analysis was performed from December 15, 2018, to February 12, 2019. Interventions Chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose (50.4 Gy to subclinical areas at risk and 63.0 Gy to the gross tumor and involved nodes, all given in 28 fractions) with concurrent docetaxel and capecitabine or fluorouracil. Main Outcomes and Measures Toxic effects, local (in-field) control, and overall survival rates. Results All 46 patients (11 women and 35 men; median age, 65.5 years [range, 37.3-84.4 years]) received per-protocol therapy, as intensity-modulated photon therapy (39 [85%]) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (7 [15%]); 11 patients (24%) ultimately underwent resection. No patients experienced grade 4 or 5 toxic effects; the 10 acute grade 3 toxic events were esophagitis (4), dysphagia (3), and anorexia (3) and the 3 late grade 3 toxic events were all esophageal strictures. The actuarial local recurrence rates were 22% (95% CI, 11%-35%) at 6 months, 30% (95% CI, 18%-44%) at 1 year, and 33% (95% CI, 20%-46%) at 2 years. Overall, 15 patients (33%) experienced local failure, at a median interval of 5 months (range, 1-24 months). The median overall survival time was 21.5 months (range, 2.3-86.4 months). Exploratory comparison with a 97-patient contemporaneous institutional cohort receiving standard-dose (non-simultaneous integrated boost) chemoradiotherapy showed superior local control (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.92; P = .03) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94; P = .02) in the group that received chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose for locally advanced esophageal cancer is well tolerated, with encouraging local control, and thus warrants further study. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01102088.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Hari Menon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven N Seyedin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Mariela A Blum
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ahmed I Younes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Jeremy J Erasmus
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology-Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jeffrey H Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kenneth R Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - James W Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fan B, Li C, Mu F, Qin W, Wang L, Sun X, Wang C, Zou B, Wang S, Li W, Hu M. Dose escalation guided by 18F-FDG PET/CT for esophageal cancer. RADIATION MEDICINE AND PROTECTION 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmp.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
19
|
Gao HM, Shen WB, Xu JR, Li YM, Li SG, Zhu SC. Effect of SIB-IMRT-based selective dose escalation of local tumor on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1640-1649. [PMID: 34043101 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01943-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the effect of SIB-IMRT-based selective dose escalation to local tumor on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer (EC). METHODS A total of 302 EC patients were enrolled. The prognostic factors of the entire group were initially analyzed, and the composition ratios of the two groups and the different doses of each fraction for PTV were compared. The propensity-score matching (PSM) was carried out (1:1 ratio), and the prognostic factors for the two groups were analyzed according to the results of COX. RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 30.0 months (23.495-36.505 months), and the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 21.3 months (7.698-24.902 months). In multivariate analysis, chemotherapy, cTNM stage and dose-per-fraction for the PTV were independent prognostic factors for OS (P = 0.013, 0.000, 0.028) and DFS (P = 0.033, 0.000, 0.047). Multivariate analysis of patients after PSM revealed that cTNM staging and dose-per-fraction were the independent prognostic factors for OS (P = 0.000, 0.015). Chemotherapy, cTNM staging and dose-per-fraction for the PTV were the independent prognostic factors for DFS (P = 0.025, 0.010, 0.015). There was no significant difference in grade ≥ 2 acute toxicities between the two groups. A subgroup analysis of patients with a single dose of 2 Gy and > 2 Gy in the SIB-IMRT group showed that OS and DFS of the latter were significantly better than those of the former. CONCLUSION The selective dose escalation to local tumors based on SIB-IMRT technique can improve the survival of patients received radical radiotherapy without increasing toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Mei Gao
- Department of Radiation, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Wen-Bin Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankan Road, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China.
| | - Jin-Rui Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankan Road, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - You-Mei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankan Road, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Shu-Guang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankan Road, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Shu-Chai Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankan Road, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li C, Tan L, Liu X, Wang X, Zhou Z, Chen D, Feng Q, Liang J, Lv J, Wang X, Bi N, Deng L, Wang W, Zhang T, Ni W, Chang X, Han W, Gao L, Wang S, Xiao Z. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the era of intensity modulated radiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Thorac Cancer 2021; 12:1831-1840. [PMID: 33949784 PMCID: PMC8201542 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the survival benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) during the years of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods Medical records of 1089 patients with ESCC who received IMRT from January 2005 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 617 patients received CCRT, 472 patients received radiotherapy (RT) alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to eliminate baseline differences between the two groups. Survival and toxicity profile were evaluated afterward. Results After a median follow‐up time of 47.9 months (3.2–149.8 months), both overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) of the CCRT group were better than those of the RT alone group, either before or after PSM. After PSM, the 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year OS of RT alone and CCRT groups were 59.0% versus 70.2%, 27.7% versus 40.5% and 20.3% versus 33.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). The 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year PFS were 39.4% versus 49.0%, 18.3% versus 30.4% and 10.5% versus 25.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). The rates of ≥ grade 3 leukopenia and radiation esophagitis in the CCRT group were higher than that of RT alone group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the probability of radiation pneumonitis between the two groups (p = 0.167). Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that female, EQD2 ≥60 Gy and concurrent chemotherapy were favorable prognostic factors for both OS and PFS. Conclusions Concurrent chemotherapy can bring survival benefits to patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving IMRT. For patients who cannot tolerate concurrent chemotherapy, RT alone is an effective alternative with promising results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lijun Tan
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical College, Harbin, China
| | - Xiao Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dongfu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jima Lv
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaozhen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weiming Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Linrui Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shijia Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Motion-compensated FDG PET/CT for oesophageal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:791-801. [PMID: 33825916 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01761-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Respiratory-induced motion of oesophageal tumours and lymph nodes can influence positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). The aim was to compare standard three-dimensional (3D) and motion-compensated PET/CT regarding standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and detection of lymph node metastases. METHODS This prospective observational study (NCT02424864) included 37 newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer patients. Diagnostic PET/CT was reconstructed in 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT. MTVs of the primary tumour were calculated using an automated region-growing algorithm with SUV thresholds of 2.5 (MTV2.5) and ≥ 50% of SUVmax (MTV50%). Blinded for reconstruction method, a nuclear medicine physician assessed all lymph nodes showing 18F‑fluorodeoxyglucose uptake for their degree of suspicion. RESULTS The mean (95% CI) SUVmax of the primary tumour was 13.1 (10.6-15.5) versus 13.0 (10.4-15.6) for 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT, respectively. MTVs were also similar between the two techniques. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences between both measurements (95% limits of agreement) of 0.08 (-3.60-3.75), -0.26 (-2.34-1.82), 4.66 (-29.61-38.92) cm3 and -0.95 (-19.9-18.0) cm3 for tumour SUVmax, lymph node SUVmax, MTV2.5 and MTV50%, respectively. Lymph nodes were classified as highly suspicious (30/34 nodes), suspicious (20/22) and dubious (66/59) for metastases on 3D/motion-compensated PET/CT. No additional lymph node metastases were found on motion-compensated PET/CT. SUVmax of the most intense lymph nodes was similar for both scans: mean (95% CI) 6.6 (4.3-8.8) and 6.8 (4.5-9.1) for 3D and motion-compensated, respectively. CONCLUSION SUVmax of the primary oesophageal tumour and lymph nodes was comparable on 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT. The use of motion-compensated PET/CT did not improve lymph node detection.
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhang Y, Feng W, Gao LT, Cai XW, Liu Q, Zhu ZF, Fu XL, Yu W. Long-term follow-up of a phase I/II trial of radiation dose escalation by simultaneous integrated boost for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2021; 159:190-196. [PMID: 33812913 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To observe the long-term survival and late adverse events in a phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ trial (NCT01843049) of dose escalation for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. METHODS Patients with ESCC were treated with escalating radiation dose of four predefined levels. Dose of 62.5-64 Gy/25-32 fractions was delivered to the gross tumor volume (GTV), with (Level 3&4) or without (Level 1&2) a SIB up to 70 Gy for pre-treatment 50% SUVmax area of GTV. Patients also received 2 cycles of chemotherapy of cisplatin and fluorouracil concurrently and 2 more cycles after radiotherapy. RESULTS Median follow-up duration was 17.2 (2.5-83.4) months for all 44 patients and 47.2 (3.9-83.4) months for 25 survivors. The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 57.6% and 41.0%, respectively. One, one, four and twelve severe (grade≥3) esophageal late adverse events (SEAE) occurred in patients of Level 1/2/3/4 (n = 5/10/16/13), with median occurrence time of 6.5 months. In univariable and multivariable competing risk models, maximal dose of the esophagus (Dmax) was found to have significant impact on the incidence of SEAE, and the cutoff distinguishing patients who developed SEAE or not was 77 Gy. CONCLUSION Boosting the gross tumor to 63 Gy while delivering 50.4 Gy to subclinical diseases in 28 fractions in locally advanced ESCC is well tolerated with promising long-term survival. Intenser dose regimen should be considered with caution before further toxicity assessment. Esophageal Dmax was significantly associated with severe late esophageal injury, while more findings of dose-volume predictors need larger-sample investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lan-Ting Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu-Wei Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng-Fei Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Long Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Wen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lee SL, Bassetti M, Meijer GJ, Mook S. Review of MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:628009. [PMID: 33828980 PMCID: PMC8019940 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, we outline the potential benefits and the future role of MRI and MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) in the management of esophageal cancer. Although not currently used in most clinical practice settings, MRI is a useful non-invasive imaging modality that provides excellent soft tissue contrast and the ability to visualize cancer physiology. Chemoradiation therapy with or without surgery is essential for the management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. MRI can help stage esophageal cancer, delineate the gross tumor volume (GTV), and assess the response to chemoradiotherapy. Integrated MRgRT systems can help overcome the challenge of esophageal motion due to respiratory motion by using real-time imaging and tumor tracking with respiratory gating. With daily on-table MRI, shifts in tumor position and tumor regression can be taken into account for online-adaptation. The combination of accurate GTV visualization, respiratory gating, and online adaptive planning, allows for tighter treatment volumes and improved sparing of the surrounding normal organs. This could lead to a reduction in radiotherapy induced cardiac toxicity, pneumonitis and post-operative complications. Tumor physiology as seen on diffusion weighted imaging or dynamic contrast enhancement can help individualize treatments based on the response to chemoradiotherapy. Patients with a complete response on MRI can be considered for organ preservation while patients with no response can be offered an earlier resection. In patients with a partial response to chemoradiotherapy, areas of residual cancer can be targeted for dose escalation. The tighter and more accurate targeting enabled with MRgRT may enable hypofractionated treatment schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangjune Laurence Lee
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michael Bassetti
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Gert J. Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Stella Mook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen C, Chen J, Luo T, Wang S, Guo H, Zeng C, Wu Y, Liu W, Huang R, Zhai T, Chen Z, Li D. Late Toxicities, Failure Patterns, Local Tumor Control, and Survival of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients After Chemoradiotherapy With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost: A 5-Year Phase II Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:738936. [PMID: 34868933 PMCID: PMC8639085 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.738936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty-seven patients with primary ESCC enrolled in this phase II trial. The majority (92.0%) had locoregionally advanced disease. They underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy. The radiotherapy doses were 66 Gy for the gross tumor and 54 Gy for the subclinical disease. Doses were simultaneously administered in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. The patients also underwent concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy, which comprised cisplatin and fluorouracil. The study end points were acute and late toxicities, first site of failure, locoregional tumor control, and overall survival rates. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 65.7 (range, 2.2-97.5) months for all patients and 81.5 (range, 19.4-97.5) months for those alive. There were 17 cases (19.5%) of severe late toxicities, including four cases (4.6%) of grade 5 and seven (8.0%) of grade 3 esophageal ulceration, four (4.6%) of grade 3 esophageal stricture, and two (2.3%) of grade 3 radiation-induced pneumonia. Twenty-three (26.4%) patients had locoregional disease progression. Most (86.7%) locally progressive lesions were within the dose-escalation region in the initial radiation plan, while majority of the recurrent lymph nodes were found out-of-field (83.3%) and in the supraclavicular region (75.0%). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year locoregional tumor control and overall survival rates were 79.2%, 72.4%, 72.4%, 70.8%, and 82.8%, 66.6%, 61.9%, 58.4%, respectively. Incomplete tumor response, which was assessed immediately after CCRT was an independent risk predictor of disease progression and death in ESCC patients. CONCLUSIONS CCRT with SIB was well tolerated in ESCC patients during treatment and long-term follow-up. Moreover, patients who underwent CCRT with SIB exhibited improved local tumor control and had better survival outcomes compared to historical data of those who had standard-dose radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuangzhen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- *Correspondence: Chuangzhen Chen,
| | - Jianzhou Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Oncological Research Lab, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Ting Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenshan Central Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shanwei, China
| | - Siyan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Hong Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Chengbing Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Yanxuan Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Weitong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Meizhou People’s Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Meizhou, China
| | - Ruihong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Tiantian Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Zhijian Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Derui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gao LR, Wang X, Han W, Deng W, Li C, Wang X, Zhao Y, Ni W, Chang X, Zhou Z, Deng L, Wang W, Liu W, Liang J, Zhang T, Bi N, Wang J, Zhai Y, Feng Q, Lv J, Li L, Xiao Z. A multicenter prospective phase III clinical randomized study of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: 3JECROG P-02 study protocol. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:901. [PMID: 32962674 PMCID: PMC7510301 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07387-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the development of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), no prospective study has investigated whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (SIB-IMRT with 60 Gy) remains superior to radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) alone for unresectable esophageal cancer (EC). Furthermore, the optimal therapeutic regimen for patients who cannot tolerate concurrent chemoradiotherapy is unclear. We recently completed a phase I/II radiation dose-escalation trial using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), elective nodal irradiation, and concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable EC. We now intend to conduct a prospective, phase III, randomized study of SIB-IMRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy. We aim to find a safe, practical, and effective therapeutic regimen to replace the conventional segmentation (1.8-2.0 Gy) treatment mode (radiotherapy ± chemotherapy) for unresectable EC. METHODS This two-arm, open, randomized, multicenter, phase III trial will recruit esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (stage IIA-IVB [UICC 2002]; IVB only with metastasis to the supraclavicular or celiac lymph nodes). In all, 164 patients will be randomized using a 1:1 allocation ratio, and stratified by study site and disease stage, especially the extent of lymph node metastasis. Patients in the SIB arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy (95% planning target volume/planning gross tumor volume, 50.4 Gy/59.92 Gy/28 f, equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions = 60.62 Gy). Patients in the SIB + concurrent chemotherapy arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and a platinum-based drug (5-6 weeks). Four cycles of consolidated chemoradiotherapy will also be recommended. The primary objective is to compare the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival of the SIB + chemotherapy group and SIB groups. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, local recurrence-free rate, completion rate, and adverse events. Detailed radiotherapy protocol and quality-assurance procedures have been incorporated into this trial. DISCUSSION In unresectable, locally advanced EC, a safe and effective total radiotherapy dose and reasonable segmentation doses are required for the clinical application of SIB-IMRT + two-drug chemotherapy. Whether this protocol will replace the standard treatment regimen will be prospectively investigated. The effects of SIB-IMRT in patients with poor physical condition who cannot tolerate definitive chemoradiotherapy will also be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03308552 , November 1, 2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin-Rui Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Weiming Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, 455000, China
| | - Yidian Zhao
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, 455000, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenyang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yirui Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jima Lv
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Tengzhou Central People's Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Tengzhou, 277599, China.
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang X, Ge X, Wang X, Zhang W, Zhou H, Lin Y, Qie S, Hu M, Wang W, Liu K, Pang Q, Li M, Chen J, Liu M, Zhang K, Li L, Shi Y, Deng W, Li C, Ni W, Chang X, Han W, Deng L, Wang W, Liang J, Bi N, Zhang T, Liu W, Wang J, Zhai Y, Feng Q, Chen D, Zhou Z, Zhao Y, Sun X, Xiao Z. S-1-Based Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy With S-1 in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Phase II Trial. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1499. [PMID: 32983991 PMCID: PMC7484368 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Intensive treatments can often not be administered to elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), leading to a poorer prognosis. This multi-center phase II trial aimed to determine the toxicity profile and efficiency of S-1–based simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy (SIB-RT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy with S-1 in elderly ESCC patients and to evaluate the usefulness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Patients and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 46 elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with histopathologically proven ESCC. The patients underwent pretreatment CGA followed by SIB-RT (dose, 59.92 Gy/50.4 Gy) in 28 daily fractions administered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy. S-1 was orally administered (40–60 mg/m2) concurrently with radiotherapy and 4–8 weeks later, for up to four 3-week cycles at the same dose. Results: The median survival time was 22.6 months. The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 80.4 and 47.8%, respectively. The overall response rate was 78.3% (36/46). The incidence of grade 3–4 toxicities was 28% (13/46). The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were radiation esophagitis (5/46, 10.9%), nausea (4/46, 8.7%), anorexia (3/46, 6.5%), and radiation pneumonitis (3/46, 6.5%). There were no grade 5 toxicities. CGA identified that 48.8% of patients were at risk for depression and 65.5% had malnutrition. Conclusion: Concurrent S-1 treatment with SIB-RT followed by 4 cycles of S-1 monotherapy yielded satisfactory tumor response rates and manageable toxicities in selected elderly patients with ESCC. Pretreatment CGA uncovered numerous health problems and allowed the provision of appropriate supportive care. Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02979691.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolin Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Haiwen Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shuai Qie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
| | - Miaomiao Hu
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Ke Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Minghe Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Miaoling Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
| | - Kaixian Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Yonggang Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Wei Deng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weiming Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenyang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yirui Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dongfu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yidian Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Xinchen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sakanaka K, Ishida Y, Fujii K, Ishihara Y, Nakamura M, Hiraoka M, Mizowaki T. Radiation Dose-escalated Chemoradiotherapy Using Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Thoracic Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-institution Phase I Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:191-201. [PMID: 32768158 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS About 80% of cases of locally advanced unresectable thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma recur within the irradiation fields after chemoradiotherapy. Radiation dose escalation using advanced radiotherapy techniques is expected to improve clinical outcomes by reducing local and regional recurrence. The current study aimed to determine the recommended escalated radiation dose for these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with locally advanced unresectable thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma with good performance status underwent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with elective nodal irradiation. SIB-IMRT was delivered in five fractions per week. The radiation dose to the unresectable gross tumour was escalated from 66 Gy to a planned maximum dose of 72 Gy in 3 Gy increments in a standard 3 + 3 design. The doses to the resectable component, superficial tumours and elective nodal regions were fixed as 60, 51 and 48 Gy, respectively. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil were concurrently administered. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as acute grade 3 oesophagitis, grade 2 pneumonitis, grade 2 cardiac toxicity and a failure to complete planned radiotherapy within 60 days. Locoregional control and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Nine patients were enrolled. RESULTS DLTs occurred in one of six and two of three patients at doses of 66 and 69 Gy, respectively. All DLTs were grade 3 oesophagitis. The recommended dose was determined as 66 Gy delivered in 30 fractions based on the predefined criteria. With a median follow-up period of 23 months, the 1-year locoregional control and overall survival rates were 67 (95% confidence interval = 19-90) and 78% (95% confidence interval = 36-94), respectively. CONCLUSION The recommended radiation dose in chemoradiotherapy using SIB-IMRT with elective nodal irradiation was 66 Gy delivered in 30 fractions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Sakanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Y Ishida
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - K Fujii
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Y Ishihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - M Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Division of Medical Physics, Department of Information Technology and Medical Engineering, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - M Hiraoka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - T Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fan XW, Wang HB, Mao JF, Li L, Wu KL. Sequential boost of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with chemotherapy for inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective phase II study. Cancer Med 2020; 9:2812-2819. [PMID: 32100452 PMCID: PMC7163105 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This prospective phase II study aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of sequential boost of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with chemotherapy for patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with histologically or cytologically proven inoperable ESCC were enrolled in this study (ChiCTR‐OIC‐17010485). A larger target volume for subclinical lesion was irradiated with 50 Gy, and then, a smaller target volume only including gross tumor was boosted to 66 Gy. The fraction dose was 2 Gy, and no elective node was irradiated. Concurrent and consolidation chemotherapy of fluorouracil (600 mg/m2, days 1‐3) plus cisplatin (25 mg/m2, days 1‐3) was administered every 4 weeks, for 4 cycles in total. The primary endpoint was 2‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Results Eighty‐eight patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 65 years (range: 45‐75 years), and 69 patients (78.4%) were men. With the median follow‐up of 26 (range: 3‐95) months, the 2‐ and 5‐year PFS were 39.3% and 36.9%, respectively, and overall survival (OS) were 57.1% and 39.2%, respectively. Tumor stage and concurrent chemotherapy were independent OS predictors. Major acute adverse events were myelosuppression and esophagitis, most of which were grades 1‐2. Nine percent and 2.3% of patients had grade 3 acute esophagitis and late esophageal strictures, respectively. Conclusions Sequential boost to 66 Gy by IMRT with chemotherapy was safe and effective for inoperable ESCC. A randomized phase III study to compare with standard dose of 50 Gy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing-Wen Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong-Bing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing-Fang Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kai-Liang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Phase I Trial of Intensity-Modulated Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy Boost with Concurrent Chemotherapy Immediately Following Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Patients Primarily with Advanced Intra-thoracic/Cervical Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:340-348. [PMID: 31655197 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Local persistence and relapse of disease in the gross tumor volume (GTV) account for the majority of treatment failures after standard chemoradiation therapy. The primary objective of this phase 1 trial was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) boost to the GTV with concurrent weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin after standard-dose chemoradiation therapy, using image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients were given weekly doses of paclitaxel (45 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 1.5) for 5 weeks with concurrent radiation therapy (50 Gy), immediately followed by an HFRT boost to the GTV with the same chemotherapy regimen. The boost doses were escalated in increments of 7.2 Gy delivered in 6 twice-daily fractions of 1.2 Gy using a modified Fibonacci design. Once the MTD was established, additional patients were treated at that dose to determine the safety. RESULTS Thirty-one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The incidence of dose-limiting toxicity was 0 of 3, 0 of 3, 0 of 3, 1 of 6 (grade 4 esophagitis), 0 of 3, and 2 of 3 (1 case each of grade 5 esophageal fistula and grade 3 pneumotitis) at 7.2, 14.4, 21.6, 28.8, 36, and 43.2 Gy, respectively, indicating an MTD of 36 Gy. Ten patients treated with this MTD showed no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common acute grade 3 or greater toxicities were esophagitis (26%) and neutropenia (19%). Late toxicity of grade 2 esophageal stricture occurred in 4 patients. The overall response rate was 84% (95% confidence interval, 42%-93%) in the entire cohort. The 1-year local control rate was 100% among those receiving a cumulative dose of the MTD or greater. CONCLUSIONS The MTD of the HFRT boost after standard chemoradiation therapy in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy was 36 Gy, resulting in the cumulative tumor dose of 86 Gy in patients primarily with advanced intrathoracic/cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and not adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. A phase 2 study to further evaluate this regimen is underway.
Collapse
|
30
|
Luo HS, Huang HC, Lin LX. Effect of modern high-dose versus standard-dose radiation in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on outcome of esophageal squamous cell cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:178. [PMID: 31623639 PMCID: PMC6798457 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1386-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94–05 has demonstrated that higher dose radiation didn’t improve outcome of patients with esophageal cancer (EC). However, several retrospective studies showed that a higher dose radiation based on modern radiotherapy techniques could improve overall survival (OS) and local control rate (LCR) of patients with EC, especially esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). As trials have provided updated and controversial data, we performed this updated meta-analysis to investigate whether high-dose (> = 60 Gy) radiotherapy in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) could yield benefit compared to standard dose radiotherapy. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out in the database of MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase. All studies published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2018 on the association between radiation dose and curative efficiency in EC were included in this meta-analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to evaluate the time-to-event data employing RevMan version 5.3. Results Eight articles with a total of 3736 patients were finally included. Results indicated that there was a significant benefit in favor of high dose radiotherapy (HD-RT) regarding OS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.72–0.84, p < 0.001; 2-year OS risk ratio (RR) = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.14–1.37, p < 0.001), progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.001, HR = 0.7, 95%CI: 0.57–0.87) and LRFS (P < 0.001, HR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.36–0.74) . Conclusions HD-RT (> = 60 Gy) based on modern radiotherapy techniques in definitive CCRT appears to improve OS, PFS amd LRFS compared to the SD-RT in patients with ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He-San Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 114 Waima Road, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
| | - He-Cheng Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 114 Waima Road, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lian-Xing Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 114 Waima Road, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Li C, Wang X, Wang X, Han C, Wang P, Pang Q, Chen J, Sun X, Wang L, Zhang W, Lin Y, Ge X, Zhou Z, Ni W, Chang X, Liang J, Deng L, Wang W, Zhao Y, Xiao Z. A multicenter phase III study comparing Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) radiotherapy concurrent and consolidated with S-1 versus SIB alone in elderly patients with esophageal and esophagogastric cancer - the 3JECROG P-01 study protocol. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:397. [PMID: 31036088 PMCID: PMC6489222 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5544-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of definitive radiotherapy for elderly patients with esophageal and esophagogastric-junction cancer is pronounced. However, little is known in terms of the best way to combine radiotherapy with other treatment options. This study aims to compare the efficiency of SIB radiotherapy alone with SIB radiotherapy concurrent and consolidated with S-1 for elderly patients. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is also incorporated in the procedure of treatment. METHODS/DESIGN The study is a two arm, open, randomized multicenter Phase III trial with patients over 70 years old with stage IIA-IVB (UICC 2002, IVB only with metastasis to supraclavicular or celiac lymph nodes) squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. A total of 300 patients will be randomized using a 1:1 allocation ratio stratified by disease stage and study site. Patients allocated to the SIB arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy (95%PTV/PGTV 50.4Gy/59.92Gy/28f) while those randomized to SIB + S-1 arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy concurrent and consolidated with S-1. The primary endpoint of the trial is 1-year overall survival. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival (local-regional and distant), disease failure pattern, toxicity profile as well as quality of life. Besides, detailed radiotherapy protocol and quality assurance procedure have been incorporated into this trial. DISCUSSION The proportion of elderly patients in esophageal cancer is now growing, but there is a lack of evidence in term of treatment standard for this group of patients, which is what we aim to obtain through this prospective phase III study. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov NCT02979691 . Registered November 22, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, 455000, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Chun Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital/Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Xinchen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Lan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital/Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Xiaolin Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen Center, Shenzhen, 518000, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yidian Zhao
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, 455000, China.
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Li C, Ni W, Wang X, Zhou Z, Deng W, Chang X, Chen D, Feng Q, Liang J, Wang X, Deng L, Wang W, Bi N, Zhang T, Xiao Z. A phase I/II radiation dose escalation trial using simultaneous integrated boost technique with elective nodal irradiation and concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable esophageal Cancer. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:48. [PMID: 30876442 PMCID: PMC6420772 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1249-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the safety and tolerability of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique concurrent with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and dual-drug chemotherapy for patients with unresectable esophageal cancer. Methods In phase I, the prophylactic PTV received a stable dose of 50.40Gy/1.80Gy/28f while the boost area was planned with 3 consecutive dose levels: the first dose level was 60.76Gy/2.17Gy/28f, and then escalated approximately every 2 Gy. ENI was incorporated in Clinical Target Volume (CTV), and paclitaxel and nedaplatin were given concurrently for at least 5 weeks. In phase II, enrolled patients were treated with Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) obtained in phase I and the compliance rate, survival results and toxicities were evaluated. Results From December 2014 to April 2017, 53 patients were enrolled. In phase I, 2 out of 6 patients developed Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) at dose level 1. Due to excessive treatment-related toxicities, the escalation process was suspended and de-escalated to 59.92Gy /2.14Gy /28 f. Three patients were treated at this dose level, all of whom completed at least 5 weeks of chemotherapy and none of whom reached a DLT, determining the newly added dose level to be the MTD. In phase II, 44 patients were treated with MTD, 31 of them (70.0%) completed at least 5 weeks of chemotherapy. The most common Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in phase II included leukopenia (21%) and esophagitis (15%). With a median follow-up time of 16.9 months, 1-y OS, DFS and local failure-free survival were 76.9, 63.6 and 78.8% respectively. Conclusion The SIB technique was feasible and safe at the MTD (95% PGTV/PTV 59.92/50.40Gy/28f) concurrent with ENI and dual-drug chemotherapy for patients with unresectable esophageal cancer. Trial registration clinicaltrials.govNCT02429622. Retrospectively registered on April 24, 2015. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1249-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Dongfu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiaozhen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sabbagh A, Jacobs C, Cooke R, Chu KY, Ng SM, Strauss VY, Virdee PS, Hawkins MA, Aznar MC, Muirhead R. Is There a Role for an 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-derived Biological Boost in Squamous Cell Anal Cancer? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:72-80. [PMID: 30583927 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the potential role for a biological boost in anal cancer by assessing whether subvolumes of high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity, identified at outset, are spatially consistent during a course of chemoradiotherapy (CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS FDG-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans from 21 patients enrolled into the ART study (NCT02145416) were retrospectively analysed. In total, 29 volumes including both primary tumours and involved nodes >2 cm were identified. FDG-PET scans were carried out before treatment and on day 8 or 9 of CRT. FDG subvolumes were created using a percentage of maximum FDG avidity at thresholds of 34%, 40%, 50%, on the pre-treatment scans, and 70% and 80% on the subsequent scans. Both FDG-PET scans were deformably registered to the planning computed tomography scan. The overlap fraction and the vector distance were calculated to assess spatial consistency. FDG subvolumes for further investigation had an overlap fraction >0.7, as this has been defined in previous publications as a 'good' correlation. RESULTS The median overlap fractions between the diagnostic FDG-PET subvolumes 34%, 40% and 50% of maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) and subsequent FDG-PET subvolumes of 70% of SUVmax were 0.97, 0.92 and 0.81. The median overlap fraction between the diagnostic FDG-PET subvolumes 34%, 40% and 50% and subsequent FDG-PET subvolumes of 80% were 1.00, 1.00 and 0.92. The median (range) vector distance values between diagnostic FDG-PET subvolumes 34%, 40% and 50% and subsequent FDG-PET subvolumes of 80% were 0.74 mm (0.19-2.94) 0.74 mm (0.19-3.39) and 0.71 mm (0.2-3.29), respectively. Twenty of 29 volumes (69.0%) achieved a threshold > 0.7 between the FDG 50% subvolume on the diagnostic scan and the FDG 80% subvolume on the subsequent scan. CONCLUSION FDG-avid subvolumes identified at baseline were spatially consistent during a course of CRT treatment. The subvolume of 50% of SUVmax on the pre-treatment scan could be considered as a potential target for dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sabbagh
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - C Jacobs
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Cooke
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - K-Y Chu
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S M Ng
- Oncology Clinical Trials Office, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - V Y Strauss
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - P S Virdee
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M A Hawkins
- CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M C Aznar
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - R Muirhead
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fan XW, Wu JL, Wang HB, Liang F, Jiang GL, Wu KL. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy alone for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: 10-year survival outcomes. Thorac Cancer 2019; 10:519-525. [PMID: 30648821 PMCID: PMC6397900 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2018] [Revised: 12/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We conducted a phase II study to explore the effect of three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3‐DCRT) alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC. This study aimed to analyze the long‐term survival outcomes. Methods Between November 2004 and April 2007, 30 patients with thoracic esophageal SCC underwent late‐course sequential boost 3‐DCRT at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The planning target volume (PTV1) comprised a 1.2–1.5 cm lateral margin around the gross tumor volume and a 3.0 cm margin, superior and inferior to the gross tumor volume. PTV2 encompassed the gross tumor volume with a margin of 0.5–0.7 cm. The PTV1 dose delivered was 50 Gy, and the PTV2 dose was a boost dose of 16 Gy, resulting in a total dose of 66 Gy. No chemotherapy was administered. Results The median follow‐up time was 30 months for all patients, and 132 months for patients who were alive. The median overall survival was 27 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.9–35.0). The 2‐, 5‐, and 10‐year overall survival rates were 56.6%, 33.3%, and 26.6%, respectively. The median progression‐free survival was 14 months (95% CI 7.7–20.2 months), and the 2‐, 5‐, and 10‐year progression‐free survival rates were 33.3%, 30.0%, and 26.6%, respectively. No severe late toxicity was observed in long‐term survivors. Conclusion Late‐course sequential boost 3‐DCRT is safe and feasible with promising long‐term outcomes for esophageal SCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing-Wen Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun-Lan Wu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Armed Police Corps Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong-Bing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fei Liang
- Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Guo-Liang Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kai-Liang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cilla S, Deodato F, Ianiro A, Macchia G, Picardi V, Buwenge M, Cammelli S, Zamagni A, Valentini V, Morganti AG. Partially ablative radiotherapy (PAR) for large mass tumors using simultaneous integrated boost: A dose-escalation feasibility study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:35-43. [PMID: 30220111 PMCID: PMC6236838 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to assess the feasibility to plan and deliver highly heterogeneous doses to symptomatic large tumors using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) during a short course palliative accelerated radiotherapy. Methods A patient with a large symptomatic chordoma infiltrating the right gluteal region was selected. A modified SIB treatment was implemented to irradiate the central volume of the tumor (boost target volume, BTV) up to 10 Gy/fraction in a dose escalation trial while maintaining the remaining tumor volume (planning target volume, PTV) and the surrounding healthy tissues within 5 Gy/fraction in twice daily fractions for two consecutive days. Four SIB plans were generated in the dual‐arc modality; a basal dose of 20 Gy was prescribed to the PTV, while the BTV was boosted up to 40 Gy. For comparison purposes, plans obtained with a sequential boost (SEQ plans) were also generated. All plans were optimized to deliver at least 95% of the prescription dose to the targets. Dose contrast index (DCI), conformity index (CI), integral dose (ID), and the irradiated body volumes at 5, 10, and 20 Gy were evaluated. Results At equal targets coverage, SIB plans provided major improvement in DCI, CI, and ID with respect to SEQ plans. When BTV dose escalated up to 200% of PTV prescription, DCI resulted in 66% for SIB plans and 37% for SEQ plans; the ID increase was only 11% for SIB plans (vs 27% for SEQ plans) and the increase in healthy tissues receiving more than 5, 10, and 20 Gy was less than 2%. Pretreatment dose verification reported a γ‐value passing rate greater than 95% with 3%(global)‐2 mm. Conclusion A modified SIB technique is dosimetrically feasible for large tumors, where doses higher than the tolerance dose of healthy tissues are necessary to increase the therapeutic gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Anna Ianiro
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology Department, DIMES Università di Bologna - Ospedale S.Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology Department, DIMES Università di Bologna - Ospedale S.Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alice Zamagni
- Radiation Oncology Department, DIMES Università di Bologna - Ospedale S.Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Department, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Department, DIMES Università di Bologna - Ospedale S.Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zhu W, Zhang Y, Kong L, Huang Y, Zheng J, Wang R, Li M, Yu J. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts lymph node responses to definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Onco Targets Ther 2018; 11:4345-4353. [PMID: 30100740 PMCID: PMC6065596 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s160456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the capability of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) to predict the clinical response of metastatic lymph node (mLN) to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) and guide personalized radiation dose in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. Patients and methods One hundred and forty-three mLNs from 59 patients with ESCC treated with dCRT and who had undergone a pretreatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan were included in the study. All defined mLNs were contoured by nuclear medicine radiologists. Response was evaluated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography and 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Results Sixty-nine mLNs showed complete response (CR), and 74 mLNs showed non-complete response. The 143 mLNs were divided into 4 groups (Groups 1–4) based on the quartiles of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax-G1, SUVmax-G2, SUVmax-G3, and SUVmax-G4) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV-G1, MTV-G2, MTV-G3, and MTV-G4). The CR rate of SUVmax-G2 was significantly higher than the other 3 groups. The escalated radiation dose improved the CR rate of lymph nodes in SUVmax-G3 (55 Gy) and SUVmax-G4 (61 Gy). The lowest CR rate was found in MTV-G4 (the group with the largest MTV). The escalated radiation dose (59.7 Gy) improved the CR rate of lymph node in MTV-Groups 3 and 4. Conclusion Pretreatment metabolic parameters can predict the response of mLNs to dCRT for patients with ESCC. The parameters could also be used to guide personalized dose to mLNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenyao Zhu
- School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China, ;
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China, ;
| | - Li Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China, ;
| | - Yong Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jinsong Zheng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Renben Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China, ;
| | - Minghuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China, ;
| | - Jinming Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China, ;
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
The Role of PET-Based Radiomic Features in Predicting Local Control of Esophageal Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. Sci Rep 2018; 8:9902. [PMID: 29967326 PMCID: PMC6028651 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28243-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the predictive performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)-based radiomic features for local control of esophageal cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). For each of the 30 patients enrolled, 440 radiomic features were extracted from both pre-CRT and mid-CRT PET images. The top 25 features with the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for identifying local control status were selected as discriminative features. Four machine-learning methods, random forest (RF), support vector machine, logistic regression, and extreme learning machine, were used to build predictive models with clinical features, radiomic features or a combination of both. An RF model incorporating both clinical and radiomic features achieved the best predictive performance, with an accuracy of 93.3%, a specificity of 95.7%, and a sensitivity of 85.7%. Based on risk scores of local failure predicted by this model, the 2-year local control rate and PFS rate were 100.0% (95% CI 100.0–100.0%) and 52.2% (31.8–72.6%) in the low-risk group and 14.3% (0.0–40.2%) and 0.0% (0.0–40.2%) in the high-risk group, respectively. This model may have the potential to stratify patients with different risks of local failure after CRT for esophageal cancer, which may facilitate the delivery of personalized treatment.
Collapse
|
38
|
Bulens P, Thomas M, Deroose CM, Haustermans K. PET imaging in adaptive radiotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY 2018; 62:385-403. [PMID: 29869484 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.18.03081-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in the multimodality treatment of several gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Positron-emission tomography (PET) has an established role in the diagnosis, response assessment and (re-)staging of these tumors. Nevertheless, the value of PET in adaptive radiotherapy remains unclear. This review focuses on the role of PET in adaptive radiotherapy, i.e. during the treatment course and in the delineation process. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The MEDLINE database was searched for the terms ("Radiotherapy"[Mesh] AND "Positron-Emission Tomography"[Mesh] AND one of the site-specific keywords, yielding a total of 1710 articles. After abstract selection, 27 papers were identified for esophageal neoplasms, 1 for gastric neoplasms, 9 for pancreatic neoplasms, 6 for liver neoplasms, 1 for biliary tract neoplasms, none for colonic neoplasms, 15 for rectal neoplasms and 12 for anus neoplasms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The use of PET for truly adaptive radiotherapy during treatment for GI tumors has barely been investigated, in contrast to the potential of the PET-defined metabolic tumor volume for optimization of the target volume. The optimized target definition seems useful for treatment individualization such as focal boosting strategies in esophageal, pancreatic and anorectal cancer. Nevertheless, for all GI tumors, further investigation is needed. CONCLUSIONS In general, too little data are available to conclude on the role of PET imaging during radiotherapy for ART strategies in GI cancer. On the other hand, based on the available evidence, the use of biological imaging for target volume adaptation seems promising and could pave the road towards individualized treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Bulens
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Melissa Thomas
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe M Deroose
- Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium - .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Deng W, Lin SH. Advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 6:79. [PMID: 29666802 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is a common type of malignancy worldwide and usually requires multidisciplinary care. Radiotherapy plays an important part in management of the disease. During the past few years, researchers have made much progress about radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, which was revealed in every aspect of clinical practice. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to show less toxicities and non-inferior prognosis. What's more, definitive chemoradiotherapy could be an option for non-surgical candidates and good responders to chemoradiotherapy. Advances in radiation techniques result in higher conformity, homogeneity, more normal tissue sparing and less treatment time. Promising prognoses and less toxicities were also seen in advanced techniques. As radiation dose higher than 50 Gy obtains better local control and survival, simultaneously integrated boost is designed to increase primary tumor dosage and keep prophylactic dose to subclinical areas. Elective nodal irradiation brings about better local control but do not show advantages in survival compared with involved field irradiation (IFI). As a trend, more tolerable chemoradiotherapy regimen would be taken into account in dealing with elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Luo Y, Mao Q, Wang X, Yu J, Li M. Radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: dose, response and survival. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 10:13-21. [PMID: 29343986 PMCID: PMC5749557 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s144687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) is an extremely aggressive, lethal malignancy that is increasing in incidence worldwide. At present, definitive chemoradiotherapy is accepted as the standard treatment for locally advanced EC. The EC guidelines recommend a radiation dose of 50.4 Gy for definitive treatment, yet the outcomes for patients who have received standard-dose radiotherapy remain unsatisfactory. However, some studies indicate that a higher radiation dose could improve local tumor control, and may also confer survival benefits. Some studies, however, suggest that high-dose radiotherapy does not bring survival benefit. The available data show that most failures occurred in the gross target volume (especially in the primary tumor) after definitive chemoradiation. Based on those studies, we hypothesize that at least for some patients, more intense local therapy may lead to better local control and survival. The aim of this review is to evaluate the radiation dose, fractionation strategies, and predictive factors of response to therapy in functional imaging for definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma, with an emphasis on seeking the predictive model of response to CRT and trying to individualize the radiation dose for EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijun Luo
- Department of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Jiangxi, Nanchang
| | - Qingfeng Mao
- School of Medical and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiaoli Wang
- Department of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Jiangxi, Nanchang
| | - Jinming Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Minghuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chen J, Guo H, Zhai T, Chang D, Chen Z, Huang R, Zhang W, Lin K, Guo L, Zhou M, Li D, Li D, Chen C. Radiation dose escalation by simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: a phase II study. Oncotarget 2017; 7:22711-9. [PMID: 26992206 PMCID: PMC5008394 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Accepted: 02/23/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) underwent standard-dose radical radiotherapy were still disappointing. This phase II study investigated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of radiation dose escalation using simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) combined with chemotherapy in 60 EC patients. Radiotherapy consisted of 66Gy at 2.2 Gy/fraction to the gross tumor and 54Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction to subclinical diseases simultaneously. Chemotherapy including cisplatin and 5fluorouracil were administered to all patients during and after radiotherapy. The data showed that the majority of patients (98.3%) completed the whole course of radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. The most common ≥ grade 3 acute toxicities were neutropenia (16.7%), followed by esophagitis (6.7%) and thrombopenia (5.0%). With a median follow-up of 24 months (5-38) for all patients and 30 months (18-38) for those still alive, 11 patients (18.3%) developed ≥ Grade 3 late toxicities and 2 (3.3%) of them died subsequently due to esophageal hemorrhage. The 1- and 2-year local-regional control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 87.6% and 78.6%, 86.0% and 80.5%, 75.6% and 64.4%, 86.7% and 72.7%, respectively. SMART combined with concurrent chemotherapy is feasible in EC patients with tolerable acute toxicities. They showed a trend of significant improvements in local-regional control and overall survival. Further follow-up is needed to evaluate the late toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianzhou Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.,CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hong Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Tiantian Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Daniel Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Zhijian Chen
- Department of Oncology, The University of Hongkong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Ruihong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wuzhe Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kun Lin
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Longjia Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Mingzhen Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Dongsheng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Derui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chuangzhen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Warren S, Hurt CN, Crosby T, Partridge M, Hawkins MA. Potential of Proton Therapy to Reduce Acute Hematologic Toxicity in Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:729-737. [PMID: 29280467 PMCID: PMC5612280 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy dose escalation using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) is predicted to improve local tumor control in esophageal cancer; however, any increase in acute hematologic toxicity (HT) could limit the predicted improvement in patient outcomes. Proton therapy has been shown to significantly reduce HT in lung cancer patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the potential of bone marrow sparing with protons for esophageal tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-one patients with mid-esophageal cancer who had undergone conformal radiation therapy (3D50) were selected. Two surrogates for bone marrow were created by outlining the thoracic bones (bone) and only the body of the thoracic vertebrae (TV) in Eclipse. The percentage of overlap of the TV with the planning treatment volume was recorded for each patient. Additional plans were created retrospectively, including a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan with the same dose as for 3D50; a VMAT SIB plan with a dose prescription of 62.5 Gy to the high-risk subregion within the planning treatment volume; a reoptimized TV-sparing VMAT plan; and a proton therapy plan with the same SIB dose prescription. The bone and TV dose metrics were recorded and compared across all plans and variations with respect to PTV and percentage of overlap for each patient. RESULTS The 3D50 plans showed the highest bone mean dose and TV percentage of volume receiving ≥30 Gy (V30Gy) for each patient. The VMAT plans irradiated a larger bone V10Gy than did the 3D50 plans. The reoptimized VMAT62.5 VT plans showed improved sparing of the TV volume, but only the proton plans showed significant sparing for bone V10Gy and bone mean dose, especially for patients with a larger PTV. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study have shown that proton therapy can reduced bone marrow toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Warren
- Cancer Research UK/Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Gray Laboratories, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Thomas Crosby
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Partridge
- Cancer Research UK/Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Gray Laboratories, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- Cancer Research UK/Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Gray Laboratories, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhao L, Zhou Y, Mu Y, Chai G, Xiao F, Tan L, Lin SH, Shi M. Patterns of failure and clinical outcomes of definitive radiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:21852-21860. [PMID: 28423530 PMCID: PMC5400628 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Because of the scarcity of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC), data for this disease entity is limited. We aim to evaluate the outcomes, prognostic factors and failure patterns of CEC treated by contemporary radiotherapy (RT). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 86 CEC patients consecutively treated between 2007 and 2015 by definitive RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy. RT was mainly delivered with Intensity Modulated Irradiation Therapy (IMRT) or Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Statistical analyses were performed on survival, prognostic factors and failure patterns. Results The median follow-up time was 19.4 months. The 3-year overall survival (OS), local regional failure free survival (LRFFS), distant metastatic free survival (DMFS), and progression free survival (PFS) were 53.6%, 57.9%, 81.5% and 41.5%, respectively. Independent predictors for poorer OS were N stage, hoarseness and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node (RLN) involvement, and predictors for LRFFS were N stage and EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction) to gross tumor volume (GTV), with ≥ 66Gy achieving local control of 94.7%. Patients receiving elective nodal irradiation (ENI) had better nodal regional control than those receiving involved field irradiation (IFI). 31 (36%) patients had treatment failure and 15 (17.4%), 8 (9.3%) and 14 (16.2%) patients had local, regional, and distant failure, respectively. 86.7% (13/15) local failures were within GTV, and supraclavicular region (62.5%, 5/8) was the most common regional failure site. No severe toxicities were observed. Conclusions Our results seem to indicate that good locoregional control might be achieved for CEC with adequate radiation dose and treatment planning approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Yongchun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Yunfeng Mu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Guangjin Chai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Feng Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Lina Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Mei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is reflecting a treatment standard in oesophageal cancer. For irresectable localised tumours and for inoperable patients, dCRT can change the treatment intent from palliative to curative. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), in particular in those of cervical location, dCRT is a proper alternative for treatment that may include radical surgery. Patients with localised locoregional recurrence after primary surgery can survive for long-term after salvage CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Stahl
- Klinik für Internistische Onkologie und Hämatologie mit integrierter Palliativmedizin, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Encaoua J, Abgral R, Leleu C, El Kabbaj O, Caradec P, Bourhis D, Pradier O, Schick U. Intérêt de la tomographie par émission de positons au ( 18 F)-fluorodésoxyglucose pour la planification de la radiothérapie des cancers de l’œsophage localement évolués ou inopérables. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:267-275. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Revised: 09/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
46
|
Jiménez-Ortega E, Ureba A, Vargas A, Baeza JA, Wals-Zurita A, García-Gómez FJ, Barbeiro AR, Leal A. Dose painting by means of Monte Carlo treatment planning at the voxel level. Phys Med 2017; 42:339-344. [PMID: 28412136 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Revised: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a new optimization algorithm to carry out true dose painting by numbers (DPBN) planning based on full Monte Carlo (MC) calculation. METHODS Four configurations with different clustering of the voxel values from PET data were proposed. An optimization method at the voxel level under Lineal Programming (LP) formulation was used for an inverse planning and implemented in CARMEN, an in-house Monte Carlo treatment planning system. RESULTS Beamlet solutions fulfilled the objectives and did not show significant differences between the different configurations. More differences were observed between the segment solutions. The plan for the dose prescription map without clustering was the better solution. CONCLUSIONS LP optimization at voxel level without dose-volume restrictions can carry out true DPBN planning with the MC accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Jiménez-Ortega
- Dpto. Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBIS, Sevilla, Spain
| | - A Ureba
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBIS, Sevilla, Spain; Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Vargas
- Dpto. Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain
| | - J A Baeza
- Dept. Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - A Wals-Zurita
- Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Servicio de Radioterapia, Seville, Spain
| | - F J García-Gómez
- Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Seville, Spain
| | - A R Barbeiro
- Dpto. Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBIS, Sevilla, Spain
| | - A Leal
- Dpto. Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain; Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBIS, Sevilla, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Huang BT, Huang RH, Zhang WZ, Lin W, Guo LJ, Xu LY, Lin PX, Chen JZ, Li DR, Chen CZ. Different definitions of esophagus influence esophageal toxicity prediction for esophageal cancer patients administered simultaneous integrated boost versus standard-dose radiation therapy. Sci Rep 2017; 7:120. [PMID: 28273921 PMCID: PMC5427902 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00168-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
We aim to evaluate whether different definitions of esophagus (DEs) impact on the esophageal toxicity prediction for esophageal cancer (EC) patients administered intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMRT) vs. standard-dose IMRT (SD-IMRT). The esophagus for 21 patients diagnosed with primary EC were defined in the following four ways: the whole esophagus, including the tumor (ESOwhole); ESOwhole within the treatment field (ESOinfield); ESOinfield, excluding the tumor (ESOinfield-tumor) and ESOwhole, excluding the tumor (ESOwhole-tumor). The difference in the dose variation, acute esophageal toxicity (AET) and late esophageal toxicity (LET) of four DEs were compared. We found that the mean esophageal dose for ESOwhole, ESOinfield, ESOinfield-tumor and ESOwhole-tumor were increased by 7.2 Gy, 10.9 Gy, 4.6 Gy and 2.0 Gy, respectively, in the SIB-IMRT plans. Radiobiological models indicated that a grade ≥ 2 AET was 2.9%, 3.1%, 2.2% and 1.6% higher on average with the Kwint model and 14.6%, 13.2%, 7.2% and 3.4% higher with the Wijsman model for the four DEs. A grade ≥ 3 AET increased by 4.3%, 7.2%, 4.2% and 1.2%, respectively. Additionally, the predicted LET increased by 0.15%, 0.39%, 1.2 × 10−2% and 1.5 × 10−3%. Our study demonstrates that different DEs influence the esophageal toxicity prediction for EC patients administered SIB-IMRT vs. SD-IMRT treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao-Tian Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Rui-Hong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Wu-Zhe Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Wen Lin
- Department of Respiratory Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Long-Jia Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Liang-Yu Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Pei-Xian Lin
- Department of Nosocomial Infection Management, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Jian-Zhou Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.,CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - De-Rui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Chuang-Zhen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Huang BT, Wu LL, Guo LJ, Xu LY, Huang RH, Lin PX, Chen JZ, Li DR, Chen CZ. Radiobiological evaluation of simultaneously dose-escalated versus non-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with upper thoracic esophageal cancer. Onco Targets Ther 2017; 10:2209-2217. [PMID: 28458564 PMCID: PMC5403125 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s132388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the radiobiological response between simultaneously dose-escalated and non-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (DE-IMRT and NE-IMRT) for patients with upper thoracic esophageal cancer (UTEC) using radiobiological evaluation. METHODS Computed tomography simulation data sets for 25 patients pathologically diagnosed with primary UTEC were used in this study. DE-IMRT plan with an escalated dose of 64.8 Gy/28 fractions to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and involved lymph nodes from 25 patients pathologically diagnosed with primary UTEC, was compared to an NE-IMRT plan of 50.4 Gy/28 fractions. Dose-volume metrics, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability for the lung and spinal cord were compared. In addition, the risk of acute esophageal toxicity (AET) and late esophageal toxicity (LET) were also analyzed. RESULTS Compared with NE-IMRT plan, we found the DE-IMRT plan resulted in a 14.6 Gy dose escalation to the GTV. The tumor control was predicted to increase by 31.8%, 39.1%, and 40.9% for three independent TCP models. The predicted incidence of radiation pneumonitis was similar (3.9% versus 3.6%), and the estimated risk of radiation-induced spinal cord injury was extremely low (<0.13%) in both groups. Regarding the esophageal toxicities, the estimated grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 AET predicted by the Kwint model were increased by 2.5% and 3.8%. Grade ≥2 AET predicted using the Wijsman model was increased by 14.9%. The predicted incidence of LET was low (<0.51%) in both groups. CONCLUSION Radiobiological evaluation reveals that the DE-IMRT dosing strategy is feasible for patients with UTEC, with significant gains in tumor control and minor or clinically acceptable increases in radiation-induced toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao-Tian Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou
| | - Li-Li Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou
| | - Long-Jia Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou
| | - Liang-Yu Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou
| | - Rui-Hong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou
| | - Pei-Xian Lin
- Department of Nosocomial Infection Management, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jian-Zhou Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - De-Rui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou
| | - Chuang-Zhen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou
- Correspondence: Chuang-Zhen Chen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 7 Raoping Road, Shantou, Guangdong Province, 515031, People’s Republic of China, Tel/fax +86 754 8855 5844, Email
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Welsh JW, Seyedin SN, Allen PK, Hofstetter WL, Ajani JA, Chang JY, Gomez DR, Amini A, Swisher SG, Blum MA, Younes AI, Nguyen QN, Minsky BD, Erasmus JJ, Lee JH, Bhutani M, Komaki RU. Local Control and Toxicity of a Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Dose Escalation in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Interim Results from a Prospective Phase I/II Trial. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 12:375-382. [PMID: 27794500 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Revised: 10/12/2016] [Accepted: 10/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 50% of recurrences after standard-dose chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer occur within the gross tumor volume (GTV). In this prospective phase I/II clinical trial, we explored the use of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) dose to the GTV. METHODS Forty-four patients with unresectable esophageal cancer received chemoradiation with an SIB of 58.8 to 63 Gy to the GTV and 50.4 Gy to the planning target volume, all in 28 fractions, with 5 weeks of concurrent docetaxel and fluorouracil or capecitabine. The end points were maximum tolerated dose, time to local failure, and clinical response. RESULTS Excluding those with less than 6 months of follow-up, 38 patients were evaluated at the time of analysis. The median age was 65 years (range 37-84). Most patients (71%) were men; 84% had T3 disease, 37% had N1 disease, 26% had N2 disease, 13% had M1 disease, and 50% had adenocarcinoma. The maximum tolerated SIB dose was 63 Gy. None experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4 or 5 toxicity. At a median follow-up time of 13.3 months (range 1.2-36.2), 11 (29%) had local failure (median time to local failure 2.5 months [range 1.5-23.9]). A comparison with 97 similar patients who received 50.4 Gy without an SIB showed that the SIB reduced the local failure rate for patients with node-positive disease (13% versus 56%, p = 0.04), adenocarcinoma (26% versus 59%, p = 0.02), or stage III-IV disease (29% versus 55%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS SIB intensity-modulated radiation therapy to gross primary disease may improve local control for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer, especially those with adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Steven N Seyedin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Pamela K Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Division of Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mariela A Blum
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ahmed I Younes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeremy J Erasmus
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology-Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey H Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutrition, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Manoop Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutrition, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ritsuko U Komaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lu J, Sun XD, Yang X, Tang XY, Qin Q, Zhu HC, Cheng HY, Sun XC. Impact of PET/CT on radiation treatment in patients with esophageal cancer: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 107:128-137. [PMID: 27823640 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2015] [Revised: 07/10/2016] [Accepted: 08/31/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE With the advances in radiotracers, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is recognized as a useful adjunct to anatomic imaging with CT, MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The objective of this review was to comprehensively analyze the roles of PET/CT for the radiotherapy of esophageal cancer. METHODS In this review, we focused on issues concerning the application of PET/CT in TNM staging, target volume delineation and response to therapy, both for the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes. Furthermore, the following questions were addressed: how does PET/CT guide appropriate treatment protocols, how does it allow accurate tumor delineation and how does it guide prognosis and future treatment decisions. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION For the staging of esophageal cancer, PET/CT played a crucial role in exploring distant malignant lymph nodes and metastasis with high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. PET/CT using different radiotracer provided a serial of thresholding methods based on standardized uptake value (SUV) to assist in auto-contouring the gross tumor volume (GTV). The change in SUV may offer a potential paradigm of personalized treatment to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In total, PET/CT has sought to further optimize radiotherapy treatment planning for patients with esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Xiang-Dong Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The 81st Hospital of PLA, Nanjing 210002, PR China
| | - Xi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Xin-Yu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Qin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Hong-Cheng Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Hong-Yan Cheng
- Department of Synthetic Internal Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Xin-Chen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|