1
|
Jeong JU, Rim CH, Yoo GS, Cho WK, Chie EK, Ahn YC, Lee JH. The Clinical Efficacy of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases by Sterotactic Body Ablative Radiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis. Cancer Res Treat 2024; 56:809-824. [PMID: 38097919 PMCID: PMC11261202 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2023.920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is increasing interest in the efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for treating colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with oligometastases (OM), recently. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of CRC patients with pulmonary OM treated with SABR and toxicities. MATERIALS AND METHODS Studies that reported SABR for CRC patients with pulmonary OM were searched from MEDLINE and Embase. Treatment outcomes including LC, PFS, OS, and toxicities of grade 3 or higher were assessed. RESULTS A total of 19 studies with 1,668 patients were chosen for this meta-analysis. Pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year LC rates were 83.1%, 69.3%, and 63.9%, respectively. PFS rates were 44.8%, 26.5%, and 21.5% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. OS rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were 87.5%, 69.9%, and 60.5%, respectively. The toxicity rate of grade 3 or higher was 3.6%. The effect of dose escalation was meta-analyzed using available studies. CONCLUSION Application of SABR to CRC patients with pulmonary OM achieved modest local control with acceptable toxicity according to the present meta-analysis. Further studies establishing the clinical efficacy of SABR are guaranteed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Uk Jeong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University College of Medicine, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Chai Hong Rim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Kyung Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - on behalf of Korean Oligometastasis Working Group, Korean Cancer Association
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University College of Medicine, Hwasun, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu F, Brown DR, Munley MT. Optimal hypofractionated radiation therapy schemes for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110223. [PMID: 38467342 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been emerging as an efficacious and safe treatment modality for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but optimal fractionation regimens are unknown. This study aims to analyze published clinical tumor control probability (TCP) data as a function of biologically effective dose (BED) and to determine radiobiological parameters and optimal fractionation schemes for SBRT and hypofractionated radiation therapy of early-stage HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS Clinical 1- to 5-year TCP data of 4313 patients from 41 published papers were collected for hypofractionated radiation therapy at 2.5-4.5 Gy/fraction and SBRT of early-stage HCC. BED was calculated at isocenter using three representative radiobiological models developed per the Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) initiative. Radiobiological parameters were determined from a fit to the TCP data using the least χ2 method with one set of model parameters regardless of tumor stages or Child-Pugh scores A and B. RESULTS The fits to the clinical TCP data for SBRT of early-stage HCC found consistent α/β ratios of about 14 Gy for all three radiobiological models. TCP increases sharply with BED and reaches an asymptotic maximal plateau, which results in optimal fractionation schemes of least doses to achieve asymptotic maximal tumor control for SBRT and hypofractionated radiation therapy of early-stage HCC that are found to be model-independent. CONCLUSION From the fits to the clinical TCP data, we presented the first determination of radiobiological parameters and model-independent optimal fractionation regimens in 1-20 fractions to achieve maximal tumor control whenever safe for SBRT and hypofractionated radiation therapy of early-stage HCC. The determined optimal fractionation schemes agree well with clinical practice for SBRT of early-stage HCC. However, most existing hypofractionated radiation therapy schemes of 3-5 Gy/fraction are not optimal, higher doses are required to maximize tumor control, further validation of these findings is essential with clinical TCP data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| | - Doris R Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Michael T Munley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Klement RJ, Sweeney RA. Metabolic factors associated with the prognosis of oligometastatic patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2023; 42:927-940. [PMID: 37261610 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-023-10110-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, it has been established that cancer patients with oligometastases, i.e., only a few detectable metastases confined to one or a few organs, may benefit from an aggressive local treatment approach such as the application of high-precision stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Specifically, some studies have indicated that achieving long-term local tumor control of oligometastases is associated with prolonged overall survival. This motivates investigations into which factors may modify the dose-response relationship of SBRT by making metastases more or less radioresistant. One such factor relates to the uptake of the positron emission tomography tracer 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) which reflects the extent of tumor cell glycolysis or the Warburg effect, respectively. Here we review the biological mechanisms how the Warburg effect drives tumor cell radioresistance and metastasis and draw connections to clinical studies reporting associations between high FDG uptake and worse clinical outcomes after SBRT for oligometastases. We further review the evidence for distinct metabolic phenotypes of metastases preferentially seeding to specific organs and their possible translation into distinct radioresistance. Finally, evidence that obesity and hyperglycemia also affect outcomes after SBRT will be presented. While delivered dose is the main determinant of a high local tumor control probability, there might be clinical scenarios when metabolic targeting could make the difference between achieving local control or not, for example when doses have to be compromised in order to spare neighboring high-risk organs, or when tumors are expected to be highly therapy-resistant due to heavy pretreatment such as chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany.
| | - Reinhart A Sweeney
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saga R, Matsuya Y, Sato H, Hasegawa K, Obara H, Komai F, Yoshino H, Aoki M, Hosokawa Y. Translational study for stereotactic body radiotherapy against non-small cell lung cancer, including oligometastases, considering cancer stem-like cells enable predicting clinical outcome from in vitro data. Radiother Oncol 2023; 181:109444. [PMID: 37011969 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.109444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Curative effects of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been evaluated using various biophysical models. Because such model parameters are empirically determined based on clinical experience, there is a large gap between in vitro and clinical studies. In this study, considering the heterogeneous cell population, we performed a translational study to realize the possible linkage based on a modeling approach. METHODS We modeled cell-killing and tumor control probability (TCP) considering two populations: progeny and cancer stem-like cells. The model parameters were determined from in vitro survival data of A549 and EBC-1 cells. Based on the cellular parameters, we predicted TCP and compared it with the corresponding clinical data from 553 patients collected at Hirosaki University Hospital. RESULTS Using an all-in-one developed model, the so-called integrated microdosimetric-kinetic (IMK) model, we successfully reproduced both in vitro survival after acute irradiation and the 3-year TCP with various fractionation schemes (6-10 Gy per fraction). From the conventional prediction without considering cancer stem cells (CSCs), this study revealed that radioresistant CSCs play a key role in the linkage between in vitro and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This modeling study provides a possible generalized biophysical model that enables precise estimation of SBRT worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Saga
- Department of Radiation Science, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 66-1 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8564, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Matsuya
- Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Research Group for Radiation Transport Analysis, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 2-4 Shirakata, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan; Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12 Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0812, Japan
| | - Hikari Sato
- Department of Radiation Science, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 66-1 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8564, Japan
| | - Kazuki Hasegawa
- Department of Radiation Science, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 66-1 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8564, Japan
| | - Hideki Obara
- Division of Radiology, Hirosaki University Hospital, 53 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8563, Japan
| | - Fumio Komai
- Division of Radiology, Hirosaki University Hospital, 53 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8563, Japan
| | - Hironori Yoshino
- Department of Radiation Science, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 66-1 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8564, Japan
| | - Masahiko Aoki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8562, Japan
| | - Yoichiro Hosokawa
- Department of Radiation Science, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 66-1 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8564, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Falcinelli L, Menichelli C, Casamassima F, Aristei C, Borghesi S, Ingrosso G, Draghini L, Tagliagambe A, Badellino S, di Monale e Bastia MB. Stereotactic radiotherapy for lung oligometastases. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:23-31. [PMID: 35402023 PMCID: PMC8989443 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2022.0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
30-60% of cancer patients develop lung metastases, mostly from primary tumors in the colon-rectum, lung, head and neck area, breast and kidney. Nowadays, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) is considered the ideal modality for treating pulmonary metastases. When lung metastases are suspected, complete disease staging includes a total body computed tomography (CT ) and/or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET -CT ) scan. PET -CT has higher specificity and sensitivity than a CT scan when investigating mediastinal lymph nodes, diagnosing a solitary lung lesion and detecting distant metastases. For treatment planning, a multi-detector planning CT scan of the entire chest is usually performed, with or without intravenous contrast media or esophageal lumen opacification, especially when central lesions have to be irradiated. Respiratory management is recommended in lung SRT, taking the breath cycle into account in planning and delivery. For contouring, co-registration and/or matching planning CT and diagnostic images (as provided by contrast enhanced CT or PET-CT ) are useful, particularly for central tumors. Doses and fractionation schedules are heterogeneous, ranging from 33 to 60 Gy in 3-6 fractions. Independently of fractionation schedule, a BED10 > 100 Gy is recommended for high local control rates. Single fraction SRT (ranges 15-30 Gy) is occasionally administered, particularly for small lesions. SRT provides tumor control rates of up to 91% at 3 years, with limited toxicities. The present overview focuses on technical and clinical aspects related to treatment planning, dose constraints, outcome and toxicity of SRT for lung metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Falcinelli
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | | | | | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | | | | | - Serena Badellino
- Radiation Oncology Department, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yu J, Kim DH, Lee J, Shin YM, Kim JH, Yoon SM, Jung J, Kim JC, Yu CS, Lim SB, Park IJ, Kim TW, Hong YS, Kim SY, Kim JE, Park JH, Kim SY. Radiofrequency Ablation versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Cancer Res Treat 2021; 54:850-859. [PMID: 34645129 PMCID: PMC9296936 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) and to determine the favorable treatment modality according to tumor characteristics. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the records of 222 colorectal cancer patients with 330 CRLM who underwent RFA (268 tumors in 178 patients) or SBRT (62 tumors in 44 patients) between 2007 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models were used by adjusting with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results The median follow-up duration was 30.5 months. The median tumor size was significantly smaller in the RFA group than in the SBRT group (1.5 cm vs 2.3 cm, p < 0.001). In IPTW-adjusted analysis, difference in treatment modality was not associated with significant differences in 1-year and 3-year recurrence-free survival (35% vs. 43%, 22% vs. 23%; p=0.198), overall survival (96% vs. 91%, 58% vs. 56%; p=0.508), and freedom from local progression (FFLP; 90% vs. 72%, 78% vs. 60%; p=0.106). Significant interaction effect between the treatment modality and tumor size was observed for FFLP (p=0.001). In IPTW-adjusted subgroup analysis of patients with tumor size > 2 cm, the SBRT group had a higher FFLP compared with the RFA group (hazard ratio, 0.153; p < 0.001). Conclusion SBRT and RFA showed similar local control in the treatment of patients with CRLM. Tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for local control and SBRT may be preferred for larger tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesang Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Dong Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jungbok Lee
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Moon Shin
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Min Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinhong Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Cheon Kim
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Sik Yu
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Byung Lim
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Ja Park
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Won Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Sang Hong
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Young Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Eun Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Hong Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - So Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Klement RJ, Andratschke N, Guckenberger M. In Regard to Ohri et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:249-250. [PMID: 31759682 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Romesser PB, Tyagi N, Crane CH. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071636. [PMID: 33915810 PMCID: PMC8036824 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Technological advances have enabled well tolerated and effective radiation treatment for small liver metastases. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) refers to ablative dose delivery (>100 Gy BED) in five fractions or fewer. For larger tumors, the safe delivery of SABR can be challenging due to a more limited volume of healthy normal liver parenchyma and the proximity of the tumor to radiosensitive organs such as the stomach, duodenum, and large intestine. In addition to stereotactic treatment delivery, controlling respiratory motion, the use of image guidance, adaptive planning and increasing the number of radiation fractions are sometimes necessary for the safe delivery of SABR in these situations. Magnetic Resonance (MR) image-guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) is a new and rapidly evolving treatment paradigm. MR imaging before, during and after treatment delivery facilitates direct visualization of both the tumor target and the adjacent normal healthy organs as well as potential intrafraction motion. Real time MR imaging facilitates non-invasive tumor tracking and treatment gating. While daily adaptive re-planning permits treatment plans to be adjusted based on the anatomy of the day. MRgART therapy is a promising radiation technology advance that can overcome many of the challenges of liver SABR and may facilitate the safe tumor dose escalation of colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B. Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
- Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Neelam Tyagi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Christopher H. Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wust P, Beck M, Dabrowski R, Neumann O, Zschaeck S, Kaul D, Modest DP, Stromberger C, Gebauer B, Ghadjar P. Radiotherapeutic treatment options for oligotopic malignant liver lesions. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:51. [PMID: 33726751 PMCID: PMC7970808 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01779-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several radiotherapeutic approaches for patients with oligotopic malignant liver lesions unfit for surgical resection exist. The most advanced competitive techniques are high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, Cyberknife, volume-modulated-arc therapy (VMAT) and Tomotherapy. We evaluated the optimal technique by a planning study for a single ablative dose with different lesion sizes.
Methods We compared dose distributions of HDR-brachytherapy with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using the Cyberknife, VMAT or Tomotherapy. Tumor-control-probabilities (TCP), normal-tissue-complication-probabilities (NTCP) were determined in a theoretical framework applying a single dose of 20 Gy (demanding 95% coverage) for intrahepatic lesions of 1–5 cm in size. We evaluated therapeutic ratios by TCP (mean dose in the lesion) relative to high-dose (conformality) or low-dose liver exposition in dependency on the lesion size for each technique. In addition, we considered treatment times and accuracy (clinical target volume vs planning target volume). Results HDR-brachtherapy has the highest therapeutic ratios with respect to high-dose as well as low-dose liver exposition even for extended lesions, and the Cyberknife being suited second best. However, for lesions ≥ 3 cm diameter the therapeutic ratios of all ablative techniques are increasingly converging, and better tolerance and shorter treatment times of noninvasive external techniques become more important. On the other hand, mean tumor doses of HDR-brachytherapy of near 60 Gy are unattainable by the other techniques gaining only 22–34 Gy, and the conformality of HDR-brachytherapy is still rather good for lesions ≥ 3 cm diameter. Conclusions HDR-brachytherapy is by far the most effective technique to treat intrahepatic lesions by a single fraction, but sparing of the surroundings declines with increasing lesion size and approaches the benchmarks of external beam radiosurgery techniques. External beam radiotherapy has the advantage to use suitable fractionation schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Wust
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Dabrowski
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Neumann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vaugier L, Mirabel X, Martel-Lafay I, Racadot S, Carrie C, Vendrely V, Mahé MA, Senellart H, Raoul JL, Campion L, Rio E. Radiosensitizing Chemotherapy (Irinotecan) with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Inoperable Liver and/or Lung Metastases of Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020248. [PMID: 33440832 PMCID: PMC7827408 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a recognized treatment for liver or lung metastases, but radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer could be lower than other primary cancers. We postulated that local responses could be improved by SBRT with a concomitant radiosensitizing agent (irinotecan). RADIOSTEREO-CAMPTO was a prospective multi-center phase 2 trial conducted between 2008 and 2013. We confirmed that SBRT-Irinotecan was a short, effective and well-tolerated treatment, with no worsening of the quality of life. It allowed for several months of chemotherapy-free periods despite most patients receiving multiple prior lines of treatment. Radiosensitizing irinotecan was able to compensate for lower SBRT dose than nowadays used for liver and lung metastases and could be an interesting regimen in case of tumour-surrounding healthy tissues requiring limited radiation dose. Abstract Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a recognized treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. We postulated that local responses could be improved by SBRT with a concomitant radiosensitizing agent (irinotecan). Methods: RADIOSTEREO-CAMPTO was a prospective multi-center phase 2 trial investigating SBRT (40–48 Gy in 4 fractions) for liver and/or lung inoperable CRC oligometastases (≤3), combined with two weekly intravenous infusions of 40 mg/m2 Irinotecan. Primary outcome was the objective local response rate as per RECIST. Secondary outcomes were early and late toxicities, EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life, local control and overall survival. Results: Forty-four patients with 51 lesions (liver = 39, lungs = 12) were included. Median age was 69 years (46–84); 37 patients (84%) had received at least two prior chemotherapy treatments. Median follow-up was 48.9 months. One patient with two lung lesions was lost during follow-up. Assuming maximum bias hypothesis, the objective local response rate in ITT was 86.3% (44/51—95% CI: [76.8–95.7]) or 82.4% (42/51—95% CI: [71.9–92.8]). The observed local response rate was 85.7% (42/49—95% CI: [75.9–95.5]). The 1 and 2-year local (distant) progression-free survivals were 84.2% (38.4%) and 67.4% (21.3%), respectively. The 1 and 2-year overall survivals were 97.5% and 75.5%. There were no severe acute or late reactions. The EORTC questionnaire scores did not significantly worsen during or after treatment. Conclusions: SBRT with irinotecan was well tolerated with promising results despite heavily pretreated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïg Vaugier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France; (L.V.); (M.-A.M.)
| | - Xavier Mirabel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France;
| | - Isabelle Martel-Lafay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (I.M.-L.); (S.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Séverine Racadot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (I.M.-L.); (S.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Christian Carrie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (I.M.-L.); (S.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Véronique Vendrely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Hôpital Saint André, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Marc-André Mahé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France; (L.V.); (M.-A.M.)
| | - Hélène Senellart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France; (H.S.); (J.-L.R.)
| | - Jean-Luc Raoul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France; (H.S.); (J.-L.R.)
| | - Loïc Campion
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France;
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie Nantes-Angers (CRCNA), UMR 1232 Inserm—6299 CNRS, Institut de Recherche en Santé de l’Université de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuel Rio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France; (L.V.); (M.-A.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-240-679-900
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ten Eikelder SCM, Ferjančič P, Ajdari A, Bortfeld T, den Hertog D, Jeraj R. Optimal treatment plan adaptation using mid-treatment imaging biomarkers. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:245011. [PMID: 33053518 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies on personalized radiotherapy (RT) have mostly focused on baseline patient stratification, adapting the treatment plan according to mid-treatment anatomical changes, or dose boosting to selected tumor subregions using mid-treatment radiological findings. However, the question of how to find the optimal adapted plan has not been properly tackled. Moreover, the effect of information uncertainty on the resulting adaptation has not been explored. In this paper, we present a framework to optimally adapt radiation therapy treatments to early radiation treatment response estimates derived from pre- and mid-treatment imaging data while considering the information uncertainty. The framework is based on the optimal stopping in radiation therapy (OSRT) framework. Biological response is quantified using tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models, and these are directly optimized for in the adaptation step. Two adaptation strategies are discussed: (1) uniform dose adaptation and (2) continuous dose adaptation. In the first strategy, the original fluence-map is simply scaled upwards or downwards, depending on whether dose escalation or de-escalation is deemed appropriate based on the mid-treatment response observed from the radiological images. In the second strategy, a full NTCP-TCP-based fluence map re-optimization is performed to achieve the optimal adapted plans. We retrospectively tested the performance of these strategies on 14 canine head and neck cases treated with tomotherapy, using as response biomarker the change in the 3'-deoxy-3'[(18)F]-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET signals between the pre- and mid-treatment images, and accounting for information uncertainty. Using a 10% uncertainty level, the two adaptation strategies both yield a noteworthy average improvement in guaranteed (worst-case) TCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S C M Ten Eikelder
- Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) commonly is used for small liver metastases. Modern conformal radiotherapy techniques, including 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy, enable the safe delivery of SABR to small liver volumes. For larger tumors, the safe delivery of SABR can be challenging due to a more limited volume of healthy normal liver parenchyma and the proximity of the tumor to radiosensitive organs, such as the stomach, duodenum, and large intestine. Controlling respiratory motion, the use of image guidance, and increasing the number of radiation fractions sometimes are necessary for the safe delivery of SABR in these situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, New York, NY 10065, USA; Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Brian P Neal
- Medical Physics, ProCure Proton Therapy Center, 103 Cedar Grove Lane, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alsuhaibani A, Elashwah A, Alkafi A, Constantinescus C, ALzorkany F. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Using CyberKnife in Oligometastatic Cancer Patients; Retrospective Evaluation, Single Institution Experience. J Gastrointest Cancer 2020; 50:879-887. [PMID: 30291546 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-018-0170-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We retrospectively evaluate local control rate at 6 months and 1 year in oligometastatic cancer patients treated with SBRT using CyberKnife. METHODS Total of 21 patients with 24 treatment sites from February 2014 till June 2017 who were treated with SBRT in our institution were included in this study. RESULTS Eleven patients were males, 10 patients were females, median age at diagnosis was 63 years, and colorectal cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in 18 patients. The abdomino-pelvic lymph nodes were the commonest treatment site in 11 (45.8%), average PTV volume of 46.4 cc. All the patients received SBRT with average (BED) of 97 GY, 7 treatment sites received BED of < 100GYgroup 1, and 17 received BED ≥ 100GY group 2. No reported G3 or G4 acute or chronic toxicity. The 6 months and 1 year local control (LC) were 95.8 and 88.2%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 16.8 months, 19(90.5%) patients were alive; among them, local progression was observed in 1 (4.1%) treatment site, while systemic progression in 4 (16.6%), and two (9.5%) patients died; they had both local and systemic failures. The 1-year local PFS rate was 82%. In univariate analysis, PTV volume was significantly correlated with LC rate at 6 months (p = 0.001), while the site of metastasis appeared to significantly correlate with PFS (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION SBRT using CyberKnife is feasible, safe, and effective treatment for oligometastatic sites. Six months and 1 year local control rate is 95.8 and 88.2% respectively in our patients cohort, treatment regimens with higher BED resulting in better 1-year local PFS, although it was not statistically significant. A larger cohort of patients and longer follow up is required for better evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Alsuhaibani
- Oncology Center, University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Ahmed Elashwah
- Radiation oncology department King Faisal specialized hospital and research center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Kasr Aleini center of clinical oncology and nuclear medicine (NEMROCK), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Abdullah Alkafi
- Radiation oncology department King Faisal specialized hospital and research center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Camelia Constantinescus
- Radiation oncology department King Faisal specialized hospital and research center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal ALzorkany
- Radiation oncology department King Faisal specialized hospital and research center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dewaraja YK, Devasia T, Kaza RK, Mikell JK, Owen D, Roberson PL, Schipper MJ. Prediction of Tumor Control in 90Y Radioembolization by Logit Models with PET/CT-Based Dose Metrics. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:104-111. [PMID: 31147404 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.226472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this work was to develop models for tumor control probability (TCP) in radioembolization with 90Y PET/CT-derived radiobiologic dose metrics. Methods: Patients with primary liver cancer or liver metastases who underwent radioembolization with glass microspheres were imaged with 90Y PET/CT for voxel-level dosimetry to determine lesion absorbed dose (AD) metrics, biological effective dose (BED) metrics, equivalent uniform dose, and equivalent uniform BED for 28 treatments (89 lesions). The lesion dose-shrinkage correlation was assessed on the basis of RECIST and, when available, modified RECIST (mRECIST) at first follow-up. For a subset with mRECIST, logit regression TCP models were fit via maximum likelihood to relate lesion-level binary response to the dose metrics. As an exploratory analysis, the nontumoral liver dose-toxicity relationship was also evaluated. Results: Lesion dose-shrinkage analysis showed that there were no significant differences between model parameters for primary and metastatic subgroups and that correlation coefficients were superior with mRECIST. Therefore, subsequent TCP analysis was performed for the combined group using mRECIST only. The overall lesion-level mRECIST response rate was 57%. The AD and BED metrics yielding 50% TCP were 292 and 441 Gy, respectively. All dose metrics considered for TCP modeling, including mean AD, were significantly associated with the probability of response, with high areas under the curve (0.87-0.90, P < 0.0001) and high sensitivity (>0.75) and specificity (>0.83) calculated using a threshold corresponding to 50% TCP. Because nonuniform AD deposition by microspheres cannot be determined by PET at a microscopic scale, radiosensitivity values extracted here by fitting models to clinical response data were substantially lower than reported for in vitro cell cultures or for external-beam radiotherapy clinical studies. There was no correlation between nontumoral liver AD and toxicity measures. Conclusion: Despite the heterogeneous patient cohort, logistic regression TCP models showed a strong association between various dose metrics and the probability of response. The performance of mean AD was comparable to that of radiobiologic dose metrics that involve more complex calculations. These results demonstrate the importance of considering TCP in treatment planning for radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuni K Dewaraja
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Theresa Devasia
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Ravi K Kaza
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Justin K Mikell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Peter L Roberson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew J Schipper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Klement RJ, Abbasi-Senger N, Adebahr S, Alheid H, Allgaeuer M, Becker G, Blanck O, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Duma M, Eble MJ, Ernst I, Gerum S, Habermehl D, Hass P, Henkenberens C, Hildebrandt G, Imhoff D, Kahl H, Klass ND, Krempien R, Lewitzki V, Lohaus F, Ostheimer C, Papachristofilou A, Petersen C, Rieber J, Schneider T, Schrade E, Semrau R, Wachter S, Wittig A, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N. The impact of local control on overall survival after stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer: a combined analysis of 388 patients with 500 metastases. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:173. [PMID: 30808323 PMCID: PMC6390357 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5362-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this analysis was to model the effect of local control (LC) on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver or lung metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS The analysis is based on pooled data from two retrospective SBRT databases for pulmonary and hepatic metastases from 27 centers from Germany and Switzerland. Only patients with metastases from colorectal cancer were considered to avoid histology as a confounding factor. An illness-death model was employed to model the relationship between LC and OS. RESULTS Three hundred eighty-eight patients with 500 metastatic lesions (lung n = 209, liver n = 291) were included and analyzed. Median follow-up time for local recurrence assessment was 12.1 months. Ninety-nine patients with 112 lesions experienced local failure. Seventy-one of these patients died after local failure. Median survival time was 27.9 months in all patients and 25.4 months versus 30.6 months in patients with and without local failure after SBRT. The baseline risk of death after local failure exceeds the baseline risk of death without local failure at 10 months indicating better survival with LC. CONCLUSION In CRC patients with lung or liver metastases, our findings suggest improved long-term OS by achieving metastatic disease control using SBRT in patients with a projected OS estimate of > 12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - N Abbasi-Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - S Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - H Alheid
- Strahlentherapie Bautzen, Bautzen, Germany
| | - M Allgaeuer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Barmherzige Brueder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - G Becker
- RadioChirurgicum CyberKnife Suedwest, Goeppingen, Germany
| | - O Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - J Boda-Heggemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - T Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Duma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar- Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany
| | - M J Eble
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - I Ernst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - S Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - D Habermehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar- Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Hass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - C Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hanover, Germany
| | - G Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - D Imhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - H Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - N D Klass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - R Krempien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - V Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - F Lohaus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - C Ostheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - A Papachristofilou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - J Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - E Schrade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Germany
| | - R Semrau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Wachter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Passau, Passau, Germany
| | - A Wittig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jingu K, Matsushita H, Yamamoto T, Umezawa R, Ishikawa Y, Takahashi N, Katagiri Y, Takeda K, Kadoya N. Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019; 17:1533033818794936. [PMID: 30145943 PMCID: PMC6111389 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818794936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine whether pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer have greater radioresistance than that of pulmonary oligometastases from other cancers and whether good local control can be achieved by dose escalation in stereotactic body radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement and methods. Studies were obtained from a database search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for publications using search terms designed to identify studies on "oligometastases," "lung," "stereotactic radiotherapy," and "colorectal cancer." For meta-analysis 1, studies that showed the number of local failures after stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma and other cancers were included. For meta-analysis2, studies in which a comparison was made of local control rates of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma by stereotactic body radiotherapy with a higher dose and that with a lower dose were included. A meta-analysis was performed using Mantel-Haenszel statics with the fixed or random-effect model by Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS Eighteen retrospective studies with 1920 patients with pulmonary oligometastases were used in meta-analysis 1. The local control rate in patients with pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer was significantly lower than that in patients with pulmonary oligometastases from other cancers (odds ratio = 3.10, P < .00001). Next, 8 retrospective studies with 478 patients were included in meta-analysis 2 for dose escalation. Better local control was achieved by a higher prescription dose than by a lower prescription dose (odds ratio = 0.16, P < .00001). CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis indicated that local control of pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer by stereotactic body radiotherapy was significantly worse than that of pulmonary metastases from other cancers; however, our results also indicated that good local control of pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer can be achieved by dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichi Jingu
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Haruo Matsushita
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Rei Umezawa
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yojiro Ishikawa
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Takahashi
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yu Katagiri
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kazuya Takeda
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Scorsetti M, Comito T, Clerici E, Franzese C, Tozzi A, Iftode C, Di Brina L, Navarria P, Mancosu P, Reggiori G, Fogliata A, Tomatis S, Torzilli G, Cozzi L. Phase II trial on SBRT for unresectable liver metastases: long-term outcome and prognostic factors of survival after 5 years of follow-up. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:234. [PMID: 30477560 PMCID: PMC6258482 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1185-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term efficacy and survival prognostic factors of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for un-resectable liver metastases in patients enrolled in a prospective phase II trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS 5-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity rates were analyzed in patients with un-resectable liver metastases enrolled in a Phase II Trial on liver SBRT, with a prescription dose of 75Gy in 3 consecutive fractions. RESULTS A total of 61 patients with 76 lesions were enrolled, with a median follow-up time of 6.1 years. One, three and 5 year LC rates were 94 ± 3.1%, 78.0 ± 5.9% and 78.0 ± 5.9%, without reaching the median LC time. Median OS was 27.6 months and the survival rates were 85.2 ± 4.5%, 31.1 ± 5.9% and 18.0 ± 4.9% at 1, 3 and 5-year after SBRT, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that favorable primary site (colorectal, breast and gynecological) of metastases (p = 0.001) improved survival. Toxicity was moderate. One patient experienced G3 late chest wall pain, which resolved within 1 year from SBRT. No cases of Radiation Induced Liver Disease (RILD) were detected. CONCLUSIONS Long-term results of this Phase II study suggest the efficacy and safety of SBRT for un-resectable liver metastases after 5-year of follow up. Selection of cases with positive prognostic factors may improve long-term survival of these oligo-metastastic patients and may confirm the role of SBRT as an effective alternative local therapy for liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 113, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Tozzi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Iftode
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucia Di Brina
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Fogliata
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 113, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Hepato-biliary Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Cozzi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. .,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 113, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. .,Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:427-434. [PMID: 29997034 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While surgery is the preferred option for isolated, operable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC), ablative techniques are endorsed for medically or technically inoperable lesions. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an alternative ablative local therapy that delivers high RT doses in a few fractions to the cancer, sparing surrounding critical tissue. We have performed a systematic review of published trials to evaluate the efficacy of SBRT as a primary modality therapy for CRC liver oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pubmed, and EMBASE for publications regarding SBRT for CRC liver metastases. Overall survival (OS: median, 1- and 2-year OS %) was the primary endpoint, and median PFS and one- and two-year local control (LC) were the secondary endpoints. A random-effect model pooled-analysis was performed to calculate the aggregated OS rates at 1 and 2 years as well as the one- and two-year LC. RESULTS A total of 18 studies, encompassing 656 patients, were included in the analysis. The pooled one- and two-year OS were 67.18% (95% CI, 42.1-92.2) and 56.5% (95% CI, 36.7-76.2), respectively. Median PFS and OS were 11.5 and 31.5 months. The pooled one-year LC was 67% (95% CI, 43.8-90.2), while the pooled two-year LC was 59.3% (95% CI, 37.2-81.5). Correlation analysis revealed a moderate/poor linear relationship between the SBRT (BED10) dose and LC (p = 0.001, R = 0.47)/OS (p = 0.001, R = 0.29) at 2 years. Mild-moderate and severe liver toxicity were 30.7% and 8.7%. CONCLUSION SBRT for liver oligometastases is an effective option for patients with advanced CRC, with encouraging local control and survival. However, a definitive validation in large randomised studies is required, due to the retrospective or non-randomised nature of the included studies and the limitations of series with different doses/schedules of treatment.
Collapse
|
19
|
Klement R, Hoerner-Rieber J, Adebahr S, Andratschke N, Blanck O, Boda-Heggemann J, Duma M, Eble M, Eich H, Flentje M, Gerum S, Hass P, Henkenberens C, Hildebrandt G, Imhoff D, Kahl K, Klass N, Krempien R, Lohaus F, Petersen C, Schrade E, Wendt T, Wittig A, Guckenberger M. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for multiple pulmonary oligometastases: Analysis of number and timing of repeat SBRT as impact factors on treatment safety and efficacy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:246-252. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
20
|
Andratschke N, Alheid H, Allgäuer M, Becker G, Blanck O, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Duma M, Gerum S, Guckenberger M, Hildebrandt G, Klement RJ, Lewitzki V, Ostheimer C, Papachristofilou A, Petersen C, Schneider T, Semrau R, Wachter S, Habermehl D. The SBRT database initiative of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO): patterns of care and outcome analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver oligometastases in 474 patients with 623 metastases. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:283. [PMID: 29534687 PMCID: PMC5851117 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4191-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intent of this pooled analysis as part of the German society for radiation oncology (DEGRO) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) initiative was to analyze the patterns of care of SBRT for liver oligometastases and to derive factors influencing treated metastases control and overall survival in a large patient cohort. METHODS From 17 German and Swiss centers, data on all patients treated for liver oligometastases with SBRT since its introduction in 1997 has been collected and entered into a centralized database. In addition to patient and tumor characteristics, data on immobilization, image guidance and motion management as well as dose prescription and fractionation has been gathered. Besides dose response and survival statistics, time trends of the aforementioned variables have been investigated. RESULTS In total, 474 patients with 623 liver oligometastases (median 1 lesion/patient; range 1–4) have been collected from 1997 until 2015. Predominant histologies were colorectal cancer (n = 213 pts.; 300 lesions) and breast cancer (n = 57; 81 lesions). All centers employed an SBRT specific setup. Initially, stereotactic coordinates and CT simulation were used for treatment set-up (55%), but eventually were replaced by CBCT guidance (28%) or more recently robotic tracking (17%). High variance in fraction (fx) number (median 1 fx; range 1–13) and dose per fraction (median: 18.5 Gy; range 3–37.5 Gy) was observed, although median BED remained consistently high after an initial learning curve. Median follow-up time was 15 months; median overall survival after SBRT was 24 months. One- and 2-year treated metastases control rate of treated lesions was 77% and 64%; if maximum isocenter biological equivalent dose (BED) was greater than 150 Gy EQD2Gy, it increased to 83% and 70%, respectively. Besides radiation dose colorectal and breast histology and motion management methods were associated with improved treated metastases control. CONCLUSION After an initial learning curve with regards to total cumulative doses, consistently high biologically effective doses have been employed translating into high local tumor control at 1 and 2 years. The true impact of histology and motion management method on treated metastases control deserve deeper analysis. Overall survival is mainly influenced by histology and metastatic tumor burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Andratschke
- University Hospital Zürich, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - H. Alheid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Strahlentherapie Bautzen, Bautzen, Germany
| | - M. Allgäuer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - G. Becker
- RadioChirurgicum CyberKnife Südwest, Radiation Oncology, Göppingen, Germany
| | - O. Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, /Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - J. Boda-Heggemann
- University Hospital Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - T. Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M. Duma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar- Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - S. Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich – LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M. Guckenberger
- University Hospital Zürich, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - G. Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - R. J. Klement
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - V. Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - C. Ostheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - A. Papachristofilou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - C. Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T. Schneider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Strahlenzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - R. Semrau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - S. Wachter
- Klinikum Passau, Radiation Oncology, Passau, Germany
| | - D. Habermehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rodemann HP, Datta NR, Bodis S. Molecular radiation biology/oncology and its impact on preclinical and clinical research in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2017; 124:339-343. [PMID: 28888706 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H Peter Rodemann
- Division of Radiation Biology & Molecular Environmental Research, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Niloy Ranjan Datta
- Center of Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau and University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Bodis
- Center of Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau and University of Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stera S, Balermpas P, Chan MKH, Huttenlocher S, Wurster S, Keller C, Imhoff D, Rades D, Dunst J, Rödel C, Hildebrandt G, Blanck O. Breathing-motion-compensated robotic guided stereotactic body radiation therapy : Patterns of failure analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 2017; 194:143-155. [PMID: 28875297 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1204-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We retrospectively evaluated the patterns of failure for robotic guided real-time breathing-motion-compensated (BMC) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of tumors in moving organs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2011 and 2016, a total of 198 patients with 280 lung, liver, and abdominal tumors were treated with BMC-SBRT. The median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 12.3 cc (0.1-372.0 cc). Medians of mean GTV BEDα/β =10 Gy (BED = biological effective dose) was 148.5 Gy10 (31.5-233.3 Gy10) and prescribed planning target volume (PTV) BEDα/β =10 Gy was 89.7 Gy10 (28.8-151.2 Gy10), respectively. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) based on various factors, including BEDs with α/β ratios of 15 Gy (lung metastases), 21 Gy (primary lung tumors), and 27 Gy (liver metastases). RESULTS Median follow-up was 10.4 months (2.0-59.0 months). The 2‑year actuarial LC was 100 and 86.4% for primary early and advanced stage lung tumors, respectively, 100% for lung metastases, 82.2% for liver metastases, and 90% for extrapulmonary extrahepatic metastases. The 2‑year OS rate was 47.9% for all patients. In uni- and multivariate analysis, comparatively lower PTV prescription dose (equivalence of 3 × 12-13 Gy) and higher average GTV dose (equivalence of 3 × 18 Gy) to current practice were significantly associated with LC. For OS, Karnofsky performance score (100%), gender (female), and SBRT without simultaneous chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors. Grade 3 side effects were rare (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS Robotic guided BMC-SBRT can be considered a safe and effective treatment for solid tumors in moving organs. To reach sufficient local control rates, high average GTV doses are necessary. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate these points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Stera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mark K H Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Wurster
- Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Güstrow, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Christian Keller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Detlef Imhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.,Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Güstrow, Germany
| |
Collapse
|