1
|
Al Saffar H, Chen DC, Delgado C, Ingvar J, Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Perera M, Murphy DG, Eapen R. The Current Landscape of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Imaging Biomarkers for Aggressive Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:939. [PMID: 38473301 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The review examines the vital role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). It focuses on the superior diagnostic abilities of PSMA PET/CT for identifying both nodal and distant PCa, and its potential as a prognostic indicator for biochemical recurrence and overall survival. Additionally, we focused on the variability of PSMA's expression and its impact on personalised treatment, particularly the use of [177Lu] Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. This review emphasises the essential role of PSMA PET/CT in enhancing treatment approaches, improving patient outcomes, and reducing unnecessary interventions, positioning it as a key element in personalised PCa management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haidar Al Saffar
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - David C Chen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Carlos Delgado
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
| | - Jacob Ingvar
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia
| | - Marlon Perera
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Renu Eapen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Predicting tumour radiosensitivity to deliver precision radiotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:83-98. [PMID: 36477705 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00709-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Owing to advances in radiotherapy, the physical properties of radiation can be optimized to enable individualized treatment; however, optimization is rarely based on biological properties and, therefore, treatments are generally planned with the assumption that all tumours respond similarly to radiation. Radiation affects multiple cellular pathways, including DNA damage, hypoxia, proliferation, stem cell phenotype and immune response. In this Review, we summarize the effect of these pathways on tumour responses to radiotherapy and the current state of research on genomic classifiers designed to exploit these variations to inform treatment decisions. We also discuss whether advances in genomics have generated evidence that could be practice changing and whether advances in genomics are now ready to be used to guide the delivery of radiotherapy alone or in combination.
Collapse
|
3
|
Elsesy ME, Oh-Hohenhorst SJ, Oing C, Eckhardt A, Burdak-Rothkamm S, Alawi M, Müller C, Schüller U, Maurer T, von Amsberg G, Petersen C, Rothkamm K, Mansour WY. Preclinical patient-derived modeling of castration-resistant prostate cancer facilitates individualized assessment of homologous recombination repair deficient disease. Mol Oncol 2023. [PMID: 36694344 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of mutation analysis of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes to estimate PARP-inhibition response may miss a larger proportion of responding patients. Here, we provide preclinical models for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) that can be used to functionally predict HRR defects. In vitro, CRPC LNCaP sublines revealed an HRR defect and enhanced sensitivity to olaparib and cisplatin due to impaired RAD51 expression and recruitment. Ex vivo-induced castration-resistant tumor slice cultures or tumor slice cultures derived directly from CRPC patients showed increased olaparib- or cisplatin-associated enhancement of residual radiation-induced γH2AX/53BP1 foci. We established patient-derived tumor organoids (PDOs) from CRPC patients. These PDOs are morphologically similar to their primary tumors and genetically clustered with prostate cancer but not with normal prostate or other tumor entities. Using these PDOs, we functionally confirmed the enhanced sensitivity of CRPC patients to olaparib and cisplatin. Moreover, olaparib but not cisplatin significantly decreased the migration rate in CRPC cells. Collectively, we present robust patient-derived preclinical models for CRPC that recapitulate the features of their primary tumors and enable individualized drug screening, allowing translation of treatment sensitivities into tailored clinical therapy recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed E Elsesy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Department of Tumor Biology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Su Jung Oh-Hohenhorst
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), QC, Canada
| | - Christoph Oing
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Mildred Scheel Cancer Career Center HaTriCS4, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Alicia Eckhardt
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Research Institute Children's Cancer Center Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Malik Alawi
- Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Christian Müller
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Bioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Ulrich Schüller
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Gunhild von Amsberg
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Department of Oncology, University Cancer Center Hamburg Eppendorf, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Cordula Petersen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Kai Rothkamm
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Wael Y Mansour
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Mildred Scheel Cancer Career Center HaTriCS4, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marinescu IM, Rogg M, Spohn S, von Büren M, Kamps M, Jilg CA, Fountzila E, Papadopoulou K, Ceci L, Bettermann A, Ruf J, Benndorf M, Adebahr S, Zips D, Grosu AL, Schell C, Zamboglou C. Ex vivo γH2AX assay for tumor radiosensitivity in primary prostate cancer patients and correlation with clinical parameters. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:163. [PMID: 36199143 PMCID: PMC9533509 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02131-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Backround Accurate surrogate parameters for radio resistance are warranted for individualized radiotherapy (RT) concepts in prostate cancer (PCa). The purpose of this study was to assess intertumoral heterogeneity in terms of radio resistance using an ex-vivo γH2AX assay after irradiation of prostate biopsy cores and to investigate its correlation with clinical features of respective patients as well as imaging and genomic features of tumor areas.
Methods Twenty one patients with histologically-proven PCa and pre-therapeutic multiparametric resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography were included in the study. Biopsy cores were collected from 26 PCa foci. Residual γH2AX foci were counted 24 h after ex-vivo irradiation (with 0 and 4 Gy) of biopsy specimen and served as a surrogate for radio resistance. Clinical, genomic (next generation sequencing) and imaging features were collected and their association with the radio resistance was studied. Results In total 18 PCa lesions from 16 patients were included in the final analysis. The median γH2AX foci value per PCa lesion was 3.12. According to this, the patients were divided into two groups (radio sensitive vs. radio resistant) with significant differences in foci number (p < 0.0001). The patients in the radio sensitive group had significantly higher prostate specific antigen serum concentration (p = 0.015), tumor areas in the radio sensitive group had higher SUV (standardized uptake values in PSMA PET)-max and -mean values (p = 0.0037, p = 0.028) and lower ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient-mean values, p = 0.049). All later parameters had significant (p < 0.05) correlations in Pearson’s test. One patient in the radio sensitive group displayed a previously not reported loss of function frameshift mutation in the NBN gene (c.654_658delAAAAC) that introduces a premature termination codon and results in a truncated protein. Conclusion In this pilot study, significant differences in intertumoral radio resistance were observed and clinical as well as imaging parameters may be applied for their prediction. After further prospective validation in larger patient cohorts these finding may lead to individual RT dose prescription for PCa patients in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioana M Marinescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Manuel Rogg
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz von Büren
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marius Kamps
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Cordula A Jilg
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elena Fountzila
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Euromedica General Clinic of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Greece and European University Cyprus, Engomi, Cyprus
| | - Kyriaki Papadopoulou
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Lara Ceci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alisa Bettermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Benndorf
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Schell
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Tumorbank Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berger J, Zech HB, Hoffer K, von Bargen CM, Nordquist L, Bussmann L, Gatzemeier F, Busch CJ, Möckelmann N, Münscher A, Betz CS, Petersen C, Rothkamm K, Rieckmann T, Köcher S, Kriegs M. Kinomic comparison of snap frozen and ex vivo-cultured head and neck tumors. Oral Oncol 2021; 123:105603. [PMID: 34798574 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of primary tumor tissue in experimental and pre-clinical cancer research is becoming increasingly important. Especially the use of tissue slice cultures of tumor specimen, so called ex vivo cultures or tumor explants, promises functional analysis under approximate physiological conditions. This includes screening and testing of targeted therapeutics directed against deregulated protein kinases. However, it is unclear if ex vivo cultures indeed represent the in situ situation especially with respect to very sensitive and transient molecular processes such as kinase dependent signaling. We now asked here, if and to what extent ex vivo culturing affects kinase activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed the activity of protein tyrosine kinases (PTK) using functional kinome profiling of either snap frozen or ex vivo-cultured tumor tissue samples of head and neck cancer patients. RESULTS Although we observed a quantitative decline in overall kinase activity after 24 h or 48 h of ex vivo cultivation, we most importantly noticed that the signaling characteristics were conserved in most samples; approximately two thirds of all ex vivo-cultured samples displayed a signaling pattern which was qualitatively comparable to the parental tumor. We could also demonstrate kinase inhibition by treatment of ex vivo slice cultures with the multi-kinase inhibitor staurosporine, although higher concentrations were needed compared to cell cultures. CONCLUSION We here demonstrate that the tyrosine kinase dependent signaling is conserved under exvivo culturing conditions in the majority of samples, which highlights the power of this method in experimental and pre-clinical cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Berger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Henrike Barbara Zech
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Konstantin Hoffer
- Department of Radiobiology & Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; UCCH Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clara Marie von Bargen
- Department of Pathology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lena Nordquist
- Department of Radiobiology & Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lara Bussmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; UCCH Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; Mildred Scheel Cancer Career Center HaTriCS4, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fruzsina Gatzemeier
- Department of Radiobiology & Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chia-Jung Busch
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Niko Möckelmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Adrian Münscher
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Stefan Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cordula Petersen
- Department of Radiobiology & Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kai Rothkamm
- Department of Radiobiology & Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Rieckmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; Department of Radiobiology & Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sabrina Köcher
- Department of Radiobiology & Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Malte Kriegs
- Department of Radiobiology & Radiation Oncology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; UCCH Kinomics Core Facility, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum - University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aerts A, Eberlein U, Holm S, Hustinx R, Konijnenberg M, Strigari L, van Leeuwen FWB, Glatting G, Lassmann M. EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:3365-3377. [PMID: 33912987 PMCID: PMC8440244 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05345-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
With an increasing variety of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic nuclear medicine as valuable diagnostic or treatment option, radiobiology plays an important role in supporting optimizations. This comprises particularly safety and efficacy of radionuclide therapies, specifically tailored to each patient. As absorbed dose rates and absorbed dose distributions in space and time are very different between external irradiation and systemic radionuclide exposure, distinct radiation-induced biological responses are expected in nuclear medicine, which need to be explored. This calls for a dedicated nuclear medicine radiobiology. Radiobiology findings and absorbed dose measurements will enable an improved estimation and prediction of efficacy and adverse effects. Moreover, a better understanding on the fundamental biological mechanisms underlying tumor and normal tissue responses will help to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as biomarkers for treatment follow-up. In addition, radiobiology can form the basis for the development of radiosensitizing strategies and radioprotectant agents. Thus, EANM believes that, beyond in vitro and preclinical evaluations, radiobiology will bring important added value to clinical studies and to clinical teams. Therefore, EANM strongly supports active collaboration between radiochemists, radiopharmacists, radiobiologists, medical physicists, and physicians to foster research toward precision nuclear medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Aerts
- Radiobiology Unit, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Uta Eberlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Sören Holm
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Roland Hustinx
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, GIGA-CRC in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Mark Konijnenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Medical Physics Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerhard Glatting
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Michael Lassmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Riedel A, Klumpp L, Menegakis A, De-Colle C, Huber SM, Schittenhelm J, Neumann M, Noell S, Tatagiba M, Zips D. γH2AX foci assay in glioblastoma: Surgical specimen versus corresponding stem cell culture. Radiother Oncol 2021; 159:119-125. [PMID: 33775712 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess radiation response using γH2AX assay in surgical specimens from glioblastoma (GB) patients and their corresponding primary gliosphere culture. To test the hypothesis that gliospheres (stem cell enriched) are more resistant than specimens (bulky cell dominated) but that the interpatient heterogeneity is similar. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten pairs of specimens and corresponding gliospheres derived from patients with IDH-wildtype GB were studied. Specimens and gliospheres were irradiated with graded doses and after 24 h the number of residual γH2AX foci was counted. RESULTS Gliospheres showed a higher Nestin expression than specimens and exhibited two different phenotypes: free floating (n = 7) and attached (n = 3). Slope analysis revealed an interpatient heterogeneity with values between 0.15 and 1.30 residual γH2AX foci/Gy. Free-floating spheres were more resistant than their parental specimens (median slope 0.13 foci/Gy versus 0.53) as well as than the attached spheres (2.14). The slopes of free floating spheres did not correlate with their corresponding specimens while a trend for a positive correlation was found for the attached spheres and the respective specimens. Association with MGMT did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION Consistent with the clinical phenotype and our previous experiments, GB specimens show low radiation sensitivity. Stem-cell enriched free-floating gliospheres were more resistant than specimens supporting the concept of radioresistance in stem cell-like cells. The lack of correlation between specimens and their respective gliosphere cultures needs validation and may have a profound impact on future translational studies using γH2AX as a potential biomarker for personalized radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Riedel
- Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Lukas Klumpp
- Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Apostolos Menegakis
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Cell Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chiara De-Colle
- Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan M Huber
- Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Division of Neuropathology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Manuela Neumann
- Division of Neuropathology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Susan Noell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bryant J, White L, Coen N, Shields L, McClean B, Meade AD, Lyng FM, Howe O. MicroRNA Analysis of ATM-Deficient Cells Indicate PTEN and CCDN1 as Potential Biomarkers of Radiation Response. Radiat Res 2020; 193:520-530. [PMID: 32216710 DOI: 10.1667/rr15462.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Genetic and epigenetic profile changes associated with individual radiation sensitivity are well documented and have led to enhanced understanding of the mechanisms of the radiation-induced DNA damage response. However, the search continues to identify reliable biomarkers of individual radiation sensitivity. Herein, we report on a multi-biomarker approach using traditional cytogenetic biomarkers, DNA damage biomarkers and transcriptional microRNA (miR) biomarkers coupled with their potential gene targets to identify radiosensitivity in ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-deficient lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL); ATM-proficient cell lines were used as controls. Cells were 0.05 and 0.5 Gy irradiated, using a linear accelerator, with sham-irradiated cells as controls. At 1 h postirradiation, cells were fixed for γ-H2AX analysis as a measurement of DNA damage, and cytogenetic analysis using the G2 chromosomal sensitivity assay, G-banding and FISH techniques. RNA was also isolated for genetic profiling by microRNA (miR) and RT-PCR analysis. A panel of 752 miR were analyzed, and potential target genes, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and cyclin D1 (CCND1), were measured. The cytogenetic assays revealed that although the control cell line had functional cell cycle checkpoints, the radiosensitivity of the control and AT cell lines were similar. Analysis of DNA damage in all cell lines, including an additional control cell line, showed elevated γ-H2AX levels for only one AT cell line. Of the 752 miR analyzed, eight miR were upregulated, and six miR were downregulated in the AT cells compared to the control. Upregulated miR-152-3p, miR-24-5p and miR-92-15p and all downregulated miR were indicated as modulators of PTEN and CCDN1. Further measurement of both genes validated their potential role as radiation-response biomarkers. The multi-biomarker approach not only revealed potential candidates for radiation response, but provided additional mechanistic insights into the response in AT-deficient cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Bryant
- Radiation and Environmental Science Centre (RESC), FOCAS Research Institute
| | - Lisa White
- Radiation and Environmental Science Centre (RESC), FOCAS Research Institute.,School of Biological and Health Sciences, Technological University Dublin, City Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Natasha Coen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Division of Cytogenetics, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland
| | - Laura Shields
- Medical Physics Department, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Centre, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Brendan McClean
- Medical Physics Department, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Centre, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Aidan D Meade
- Radiation and Environmental Science Centre (RESC), FOCAS Research Institute.,School of Physics & Clinical & Optometric Sciences, Technological University Dublin, City Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Fiona M Lyng
- Radiation and Environmental Science Centre (RESC), FOCAS Research Institute.,School of Physics & Clinical & Optometric Sciences, Technological University Dublin, City Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Orla Howe
- Radiation and Environmental Science Centre (RESC), FOCAS Research Institute.,School of Biological and Health Sciences, Technological University Dublin, City Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rassamegevanon T, Löck S, Baumann M, Krause M, von Neubeck C. Comparable radiation response of ex vivo and in vivo irradiated tumor samples determined by residual γH2AX. Radiother Oncol 2019; 139:94-100. [PMID: 31445839 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 06/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE a) To investigate if an ex vivo cultured and irradiated tumor biopsy reflects and predicts the radiation response of the corresponding in vivo irradiated tumor measured with the DNA double strand break marker γH2AX foci. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (hHNSCC) xenograft models were used. Fine needle biopsies were taken from anesthetized tumor-bearing NMRI nude mice prior to in vivo single dose irradiation (0, 2, 4, or 8 Gy) under ambient blood flow. Biopsies were ex vivo reoxygenated and irradiated with equivalent doses. Tumors and biopsies were fixed 24 h post irradiation, and γH2AX foci were assessed in oxygenated tumor regions. RESULTS Linear regression analysis showed comparable slopes of the residual γH2AX foci dose-response curves in four out of five hHNSCC models when in vivo and ex vivo cohorts were compared. The slopes from ex vivo biopsies and in vivo tumors could classify the respective tumor model as sensitive or resistant according to the intrinsic radiation sensitivity (TCD50). CONCLUSION The ability of ex vivo irradiated tumor biopsies to reflect and predict the intrinsic radiation response of in vivo tumors increases the translational potential of the ex vivo γH2AX foci assay as a diagnostic tool for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Treewut Rassamegevanon
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany.
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meneceur S, Löck S, Gudziol V, Hering S, Bütof R, Rehm M, Baumann M, Krause M, von Neubeck C. Residual gammaH2AX foci in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas as predictors for tumour radiosensitivity: Evaluation in pre-clinical xenograft models and clinical specimens. Radiother Oncol 2019; 137:24-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
11
|
Köcher S, Beyer B, Lange T, Nordquist L, Volquardsen J, Burdak‐Rothkamm S, Schlomm T, Petersen C, Rothkamm K, Mansour WY. A functional
ex vivo
assay to detect PARP1‐EJ repair and radiosensitization by PARP‐inhibitor in prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 2019; 144:1685-1696. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Köcher
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental RadiooncologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Burkhard Beyer
- Martini‐Klinik, Prostate Cancer CenterUniversity Medical Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Tobias Lange
- Institute of AnatomyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Lena Nordquist
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental RadiooncologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Jennifer Volquardsen
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental RadiooncologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Susanne Burdak‐Rothkamm
- Department of Radiotherapy and RadiooncologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Martini‐Klinik, Prostate Cancer CenterUniversity Medical Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Cordula Petersen
- Department of Radiotherapy and RadiooncologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Kai Rothkamm
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental RadiooncologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Wael Yassin Mansour
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental RadiooncologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
- Department of Tumor BiologyNational Cancer Institute, Cairo University Cairo Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zamboglou C, Eiber M, Fassbender TR, Eder M, Kirste S, Bock M, Schilling O, Reichel K, van der Heide UA, Grosu AL. Multimodal imaging for radiation therapy planning in patients with primary prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 8:8-16. [PMID: 33458410 PMCID: PMC7807571 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of advanced imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) or Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in radiation therapy (RT) planning of patients with primary prostate cancer demands several preconditions: accurate staging of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor mass, robust delineation of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) and a reproducible characterization of the prostate cancer's biological properties. In the current review we searched for the currently available imaging techniques and we discussed their ability to fulfill these preconditions. We found that current pretreatment imaging was mainly performed with mpMRI and/or Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging. Both techniques offered an accurate detection of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor burden and had a major impact on RT concepts. However, some studies postulated that mpMRI and PSMA PET had complementary information for intraprostatic GTV detection. Moreover, interobserver differences for intraprostatic tumor delineation based on mpMRI were observed. It is currently unclear whether PET based GTV delineation underlies also interobserver heterogeneity. Further research is warranted to answer whether multimodal imaging is able to visualize biological processes related to prostate cancer pathophysiology and radiation resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas R. Fassbender
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eder
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Schilling
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Reichel
- Department of Urology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Uulke A. van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wilkins A, Melcher A, Somaiah N. Science in Focus: Biological Optimisation of Radiotherapy Fraction Size in an Era of Immune Oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:605-608. [PMID: 30041845 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Wilkins
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Melcher
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - N Somaiah
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rassamegevanon T, Löck S, Baumann M, Krause M, von Neubeck C. Heterogeneity of γH2AX Foci Increases in Ex Vivo Biopsies Relative to In Vivo Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:E2616. [PMID: 30181446 PMCID: PMC6163410 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19092616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Revised: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The biomarker for DNA double stand breaks, gammaH2AX (γH2AX), holds a high potential as an intrinsic radiosensitivity predictor of tumors in clinical practice. Here, two published γH2AX foci datasets from in and ex vivo exposed human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (hHNSCC) xenografts were statistically re-evaluated for the effect of the assay setting (in or ex vivo) on cellular geometry and the degree of heterogeneity in γH2AX foci. Significant differences between the nucleus areas of in- and ex vivo exposed samples were found. However, the number of foci increased linearly with nucleus area in irradiated samples of both settings. Moreover, irradiated tumor cells showed changes of nucleus area distributions towards larger areas compared to unexposed samples, implying cell cycle alteration after radiation exposure. The number of residual γH2AX foci showed a higher degree of intra-tumoral heterogeneity in the ex vivo exposed samples relative to the in vivo exposed samples. In the in vivo setting, the highest intra-tumoral heterogeneity was observed in initial γH2AX foci numbers (foci detected 30 min following irradiation). These results suggest that the tumor microenvironment and the culture condition considerably influence cellular adaptation and DNA damage repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Treewut Rassamegevanon
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), 01328 Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), 01328 Dresden, Germany.
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pötter R, Balosso J, Baumann M, Bert C, Davies J, Enghardt W, Fossati P, Harris S, Jones B, Krämer M, Mayer R, Mock U, Pullia M, Schreiner T, Dosanjh M, Debus J, Orecchia R, Georg D. Union of light ion therapy centers in Europe (ULICE EC FP7) – Objectives and achievements of joint research activities. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:83-100. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
16
|
Zschaeck S, Lohaus F, Beck M, Habl G, Kroeze S, Zamboglou C, Koerber SA, Debus J, Hölscher T, Wust P, Ganswindt U, Baur ADJ, Zöphel K, Cihoric N, Guckenberger M, Combs SE, Grosu AL, Ghadjar P, Belka C. PSMA-PET based radiotherapy: a review of initial experiences, survey on current practice and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:90. [PMID: 29751842 PMCID: PMC5948793 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1047-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
68Gallium prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography (PET) is an increasingly used imaging modality in prostate cancer, especially in cases of tumor recurrence after curative intended therapy. Owed to the novelty of the PSMA-targeting tracers, clinical evidence on the value of PSMA-PET is moderate but rapidly increasing. State of the art imaging is pivotal for radiotherapy treatment planning as it may affect dose prescription, target delineation and use of concomitant therapy. This review summarizes the evidence on PSMA-PET imaging from a radiation oncologist’s point of view. Additionally a short survey containing twelve examples of patients and 6 additional questions was performed in seven mayor academic centers with experience in PSMA ligand imaging and the findings are reported here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. .,Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gregor Habl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), München, Germany
| | - Stephanie Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Alexander Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German cancer research center (DKFZ) and german consortium for translational cancer research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German cancer research center (DKFZ) and german consortium for translational cancer research (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Wust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Klaus Zöphel
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nikola Cihoric
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, München, Switzerland
| | | | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), München, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Dresden, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thomann B, Sachpazidis I, Koubar K, Zamboglou C, Mavroidis P, Wiehle R, Grosu AL, Baltas D. Influence of inhomogeneous radiosensitivity distributions and intrafractional organ movement on the tumour control probability of focused IMRT in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:62-67. [PMID: 29548559 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the influence of radioresistance and intrafractional movement on the tumour control probability (TCP) in IMRT prostate treatments using simultaneous integrated boosts to PSMA-PET/CT-delineated GTVs. MATERIALS AND METHODS 13 patients had PSMA-PET/CT prior to prostatectomy and histopathological examination. Two GTVs were available: GTV-PET and GTV-histo, which is the true cancer volume. Focused IMRT plans delivering 77 Gy in 35 fractions to the prostate and 95 Gy to PTV-PET were produced. For random portions of the true cancer volume, α and α/β were uniformly changed to represent different radiosensitivity reductions. TCP was calculated (linear quadratic model) for the true cancer volume with and without simulated intrafractional movement. RESULTS Intrafractional movement increased the TCP by up to 10.2% in individual cases and 1.2% averaged over all cases for medium radiosensitivity levels. At lower levels of radiosensitivity, movement decreased the TCP. Radiosensitivity reductions of 10-20% led to TCP reductions of 1-24% and 10-68% for 1% and 5% affected cancer volume, respectively. There is no linear correlation but a sudden breakdown of TCPs within a small range of radiosensitivity levels. CONCLUSION TCP drops significantly within a narrow range of radiosensitivity levels. Intrafractional movement can increase TCP when the boost volume is surrounded by a sufficiently high dose plateau.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Thomann
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Ilias Sachpazidis
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Khodor Koubar
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Panayiotis Mavroidis
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Radiation Oncology, USA
| | - Rolf Wiehle
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|