Serial 4DCT/4DPET imaging to predict and monitor response for locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer chemo-radiotherapy

Early radiologic and metabolic tumour response assessment during combined chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC

Background

The role of early treatment response for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT) is unclear. The study aims to investigate the predictive value of response to induction chemotherapy (iCX) and the correlation with pattern of failure (PoF).

Materials and methods

Patients with LA-NSCLC treated with cCRT were included for analyses (n = 276). Target delineations were registered from radiotherapy planning PET/CT to diagnostic PET/CT, in between which patients received iCX. Volume, sphericity, and SUVpeak were extracted from each scan. First site of failure was categorised as loco-regional (LR), distant (DM), or simultaneous LR+M (LR+M). Fine and Gray models for PoF were performed: a baseline model (including performance status (PS), stage, and histology), an image model for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and an image model for non-SCC. Parameters included PS, volume (VOL) of tumour, VOL of lymph nodes, ΔVOL, sphericity, SUVpeak, ΔSUVpeak, and oligometastatic disease.

Results

Median follow-up was 7.6 years. SCC had higher sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) for LRF (sHR = 2.771 [1.577:4.87], p < 0.01) and decreased sHR for DM (sHR = 0.247 [0.125:0.485], p  <  0.01). For both image models, high diagnostic SUVpeak increased risk of LRF (sHR = 1.059 [1.05:1.106], p < 0.01 for SCC, sHR = 1.12 [1.03:1.21], p < 0.01 for non-SCC). Patients with SCC and less decrease in VOL had higher sHR for DM (sHR = 1.025[1.001:1.048] pr. % increase, p = 0.038).

Conclusion

Poor response in disease volume was correlated with higher sHR of DM for SCC, no other clear correlation of response and PoF was observed. Histology significantly correlated with PoF with SCC prone to LRF and non-SCC prone to DM as first site of failure. High SUVpeak at diagnosis increased the risk of LRF for both histologies.

Pretreatment 18-FDG-PET/CT parameters can serve as prognostic imaging biomarkers in recurrent NSCLC patients treated with reirradiation-chemoimmunotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Our study aimed to assess whether quantitative pretreatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters could predict prognostic clinical outcome of recurrent NSCLC patients who may benefit from ablative reirradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with recurrent NSCLC of all UICC stages who underwent ablative thoracic reirradiation were analyzed. Twenty-nine (60%) patients received immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in addition to reirradiation. Twelve patients (25%) received reirradiation only and seven (15%) received chemotherapy and reirradiation. Pretreatment 18-FDG-PET/CT was mandatory in initial diagnosis and recurrence, based on which volumetric and intensity quantitative parameters were measured before reirradiation and their impact on overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional control was assessed.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 16.7 months, the median OS was 21.8 months (95%-CI: 16.2-27.3). On multivariate analysis, OS and PFS were significantly influenced by MTV (p < 0.001 for OS; p = 0.006 for PFS), TLG (p < 0.001 for OS; p = 0.001 for PFS) and SUL peak (p = 0.0024 for OS; p = 0.02 for PFS) of the tumor and MTV (p = 0.004 for OS; p < 0.001 for PFS) as well as TLG (p = 0.007 for OS; p = 0.015 for PFS) of the metastatic lymph nodes. SUL peak of the tumor (p = 0.05) and the MTV of the lymph nodes (p = 0.003) were only PET quantitative parameters that significantly impacted LRC.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment tumor and metastastic lymph node MTV, TLG and tumor SUL peak significantly correlated with clinical outcome in recurrent NSCLC patients treated with reirradiation-chemoimmunotherapy.

The prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT taken immediately after completion of radiotherapy for lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A pilot study

PURPOSE

The prognostic value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) taken immediately after completion of radiotherapy in lung cancer patients is not well known. The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic value of PET/CT taken immediately after completion of radiotherapy in lung cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with primary lung cancer planned to undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. Patients underwent PET/CT scans at 3 time points: before radiotherapy, within 24hours of completing radiotherapy (im-PET/CT), and 2-9 months after radiotherapy (post-PET/CT). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) was obtained. A post-PET/CT-SUV_max cut-off of 2.5 was determined as radiotherapy success.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled. im-PET/CT-SUV_max for patients in the high post-PET/CT-SUV_max group was significantly higher than that of the low group (P=0.004). Receiver operator curve analysis indicated that im-PET/CT-SUV_max of 4.35 was an optimal cut-off value to discriminate between the two groups. Multivariable analysis showed that a high im-PET/CT-SUV_max was significantly associated with a high post-PET/CT-SUV_max (P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

PET/CT-SUV_max taken immediately following radiotherapy was associated with that evaluated 2-9 months after radiotherapy.

Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy

This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.

Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy

This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.

The dynamics and prognostic value of FDG PET-metrics in weekly monitoring of (chemo)radiotherapy for NSCLC

PURPOSE

To test if the relative change in FDG-PET SUV_max over the course of treatment was associated with disease progression and overall survival. Additionally, the prognostic values of other first-order PET-metric changes were investigated.

METHODS

The study included 38 patients with stage II-III NSCLC, who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients received two pre-treatment FDG-PET scans and four during-treatment scans at weekly intervals. SUV_max was normalized to the start of treatment and analyzed using linear regression. Linear regression coefficients of other first order PET-metrics were grouped according to dissimilarity. Associations to patient outcome were analyzed using Cox hazard ratio.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients satisfied the criteria for analysis. All PET-metrics demonstrated a strong linear correlation with time during treatment [median R-range: -0.87: -0.97]. No strong associations (p > 0.10) were found for the relative slope of SUV_max to patient outcomes. Other first-order metrics did correlate with outcome but the single imaging time-point maximizing the association of PET response with outcome varied per PET metric and outcome parameter.

CONCLUSION

All investigated FDG PET metrics linearly decreased during treatment. Relative change in SUV_max was not associated to patient outcome while several other first order PET-metrics were related to patient outcome. A single optimal imaging time-point could not be identified.

Non-small cell lung cancer stage migration as a function of wait times from diagnostic imaging: A pooled analysis from five international centres

INTRODUCTION

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can experience rapid disease progression between initial staging FDG-PET scans and commencement of curative-intent radiotherapy (RT). Previous studies that estimated stage migration rates by comparing staging PET/CT and treatment-planning PET/CT images were limited by small sample sizes.

METHODS

This multicenter, international study combined prospective data from five institutions for PET-staged patients with NSCLC who were intended to receive curative-intent RT. TNM status was compared for staging and RT planning scans and the probability of TNM status and overall stage migration was analyzed as a function of the interval between PET/CT scans. The impacts of N classification, overall stage, and pathology were also studied.

RESULTS

Pooled data from 181 patients were analyzed. The median interval between PET/CT scans was 42 days (range, 2-208). Upstaging occurred in 32 % of patients. The overall rate of stage migration was higher for patients presenting with initial stage IIIB/IIIC disease (p = 0.006) and patients with N2-3 nodal disease (p = 0.019). Upstaging to M1 disease was significantly associated with initial stage IIIB/IIIC disease (HR = 15.2) and adenocarcinoma (HR = 10) histology.

CONCLUSION

Longer intervals between imaging and treatment in patients with NSCLC were associated with high rates disease progression with consequent risks of geographic miss in RT planning and futile treatment in patients with M1 disease. Patients with more extensive initial nodal involvement and those with adenocarcinoma had the highest rates of stage migration. Dedicated RT planning PET/CT imaging is recommended, especially if >3 weeks have elapsed after initial staging.

Cone-Beam-CT Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Enables Quality Assurance and Superior Sparing of Healthy Lung

Purpose

To evaluate the potential of cone-beam-CT (CB-CT) guided adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for sparing of surrounding organs-at-risk (OAR).

Materials and Methods

In 10 patients with locally advanced NSCLC, daily CB-CT imaging was acquired during radio- (n = 4) or radiochemotherapy (n = 6) for simulation of ART. Patients were treated with conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with total doses of 60–66 Gy (pPlan) (311 fraction CB-CTs). OAR were segmented on every daily CB-CT and the tumor volumes were modified weekly depending on tumor changes. Doses actually delivered were recalculated on daily images (dPlan), and voxel-wise dose accumulation was performed using a deformable registration algorithm. For simulation of ART, treatment plans were adapted using the new contours and re-optimized weekly (aPlan).

Results

CB-CT showed continuous tumor regression of 1.1 ± 0.4% per day, leading to a residual gross tumor volume (GTV) of 65.3 ± 13.4% after 6 weeks of radiotherapy (p = 0.005). Corresponding PTVs decreased to 83.7 ± 7.8% (p = 0.005). In the actually delivered plans (dPlan), both conformity (p = 0.005) and homogeneity (p = 0.059) indices were impaired compared to the initial plans (pPlan). This resulted in higher actual lung doses than planned: V_20Gy was 34.6 ± 6.8% instead of 32.8 ± 4.9% (p = 0.066), mean lung dose was 19.0 ± 3.1 Gy instead of 17.9 ± 2.5 Gy (p = 0.013). The generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) of the lung was 18.9 ± 3.1 Gy instead of 17.8 ± 2.5 Gy (p = 0.013), leading to an increased lung normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of 15.2 ± 13.9% instead of 9.6 ± 7.3% (p = 0.017). Weekly plan adaptation enabled decreased lung V_20Gy of 31.6 ± 6.2% (−3.0%, p = 0.007), decreased mean lung dose of 17.7 ± 2.9 Gy (−1.3 Gy, p = 0.005), and decreased lung gEUD of 17.6 ± 2.9 Gy (−1.3 Gy, p = 0.005). Thus, resulting lung NTCP was reduced to 10.0 ± 9.5% (−5.2%, p = 0.005). Target volume coverage represented by conformity and homogeneity indices could be improved by weekly plan adaptation (CI: p = 0.007, HI: p = 0.114) and reached levels of the initial plan (CI: p = 0.721, HI: p = 0.333).

Conclusion

IGRT with CB-CT detects continuous GTV and PTV changes. CB-CT-guided ART for locally advanced NSCLC is feasible and enables superior sparing of healthy lung at high levels of plan conformity.

Local and regional treatment response by 18FDG-PET-CT-scans 4 weeks after concurrent hypofractionated chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate associations of early post-treatment ¹⁸Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission-tomography (FDG-PET)-scans with local (LF), regional (RF), distant failure (DF) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC)-patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-seven stage IIIA-B NSCLC-patients included in a randomized phase II-trial (NTR2230) received 66 Gy (24x2.75 Gy) with low dose Cisplatin +/- Cetuximab. FDG-PET-scans were performed at baseline and 4 weeks post-treatment (range, 1.6-10.1). SUV_max, SUV_mean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and gross tumor volume were calculated separately for the primary tumor and the involved lymph nodes to generate baseline, post-treatment, and relative response metrics defined as (metric_pre-metric_post)/metric_pre. Univariable cox regression analyses were performed to investigate associations between PET-metrics and outcomes.

RESULTS

Metrics resulted from the post-treatment scan and relative response were associated with outcome, but baseline metrics were not. Primary tumor metrics were stronger associated with all outcomes than lymph node metrics. Both the volumetric (TLG/MTV) and intensity (SUV_max/SUV_mean) PET-metrics were associated with OS. The intensity metrics were associated with LF, while the volumetric PET-metrics were associated with RF/DF. This was in contrast to the nodal metrics, demonstrating only an association between RF and the relative response of TLG/MTV. No preference was found between PET volumetric and intensity metrics associated with outcome.

CONCLUSION

Early post-treatment PET-metrics are associated with treatment outcome in LA-NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Both volumetric and intensity PET-metrics are useful, but more for the primary tumor than for lymph nodes.

Voxel Forecast for Precision Oncology: Predicting Spatially Variant and Multiscale Cancer Therapy Response on Longitudinal Quantitative Molecular Imaging

PURPOSE

Prediction of spatially variant response to cancer therapies can inform risk-adaptive management within precision oncology. We developed the "Voxel Forecast" multiscale regression framework for predicting spatially variant tumor response to chemoradiotherapy on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Twenty-five patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, enrolled on the FLARE-RT phase II trial (NCT02773238), underwent FDG PET/CT imaging prior to (PETpre) and during week 3 (PETmid) of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Voxel Forecast was designed to predict tumor voxel standardized uptake value (SUV) on PETmid from baseline patient-level and voxel-level covariates using a custom generalized least squares (GLS) algorithm. Matérn covariance matrices were fit to patient- specific empirical variograms of distance-dependent intervoxel correlation. Regression coefficients from variogram-based weights and corresponding standard errors were estimated using the jackknife technique. The framework was validated using statistical simulations of known spatially variant tumor response. Mean absolute prediction errors (MAEs) of Voxel Forecast models were calculated under leave-one-patient-out cross-validation.

RESULTS

Patient-level forecasts resulted in tumor voxel SUV MAE on PETmid of 1.5 g/mL while combined patient- and voxel-level forecasts achieved lower MAE of 1.0 g/mL (P < 0.0001). PETpre voxel SUV was the most important predictor of PETmid voxel SUV. Patients with a greater percentage of under-responding tumor voxels were classified as PETmid nonresponders (P = 0.030) with worse overall survival prognosis (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Voxel Forecast multiscale regression provides a statistical framework to predict voxel-wise response patterns during therapy. Voxel Forecast can be extended to predict spatially variant response on multimodal quantitative imaging and may eventually guide optimized spatial-temporal dose distributions for precision cancer therapy.

Greater reduction in mid-treatment FDG-PET volume may be associated with worse survival in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study tested the hypotheses that 1) changes in mid-treatment fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) parameters are predictive of overall survival (OS) and 2) mid-treatment FDG-PET-adapted treatment has the potential to improve survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with stage I-III NSCLC requiring daily fractionated radiation were eligible. FDG-PET-CT scans were obtained prior to and mid-treatment with radiotherapy at 40-50 Gy. The normalized maximum standardized uptake value (NSUVmax), normalized mean SUV (NSUVmean), PET-metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and computed tomography-based gross tumor volume (CT-GTV) were consistently measured for all patients. The primary study endpoint was OS.

RESULTS

The study is comprised of 102 patients who received 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, among whom 30 patients who received mid-treatment PET-adapted dose escalation radiotherapy. All PET-CT parameters decreased significantly (P < 0.001) mid-treatment, with greater reductions in FDG-volumetric parameters compared to FDG-activity factors. Mid-treatment changes in MTV (P = 0.053) and TLG (P = 0.021) were associated with OS, while changes in NSUVmax, NSUVmean, and CT-GTV were not (all Ps>0.1). Patients receiving conventional radiation (60-70 Gy) with MTV reductions greater than the mean had a median survival of 14 months, compared to those with MTV reductions less than the mean who had a median survival of 22 months. By contrast, patients receiving mid-treatment PET-adapted radiation with MTV reductions greater than the mean had a median survival of 33 months, compared to those with MTV reductions less than the mean who had a median survival of 19 months. Overall, PET-adapted treatment resulted in a 19% better 5-year survival than conventional radiation.

CONCLUSION

Changes in mid-treatment PET-volumetric parameters were significantly associated with survival in NSCLC. A greater reduction in the mid-treatment MTV was associated with worse survival in patients treated with standard radiation, but with better survival in patients who received mid-treatment PET-adapted treatment.

Rationale and Protocol for a Canadian Multicenter Phase II Randomized Trial Assessing Selective Metabolically Adaptive Radiation Dose Escalation in Locally Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NCT02788461)

We explain the rationale for metabolically adaptive radiation dose escalation in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and describe the design of a Canadian phase II randomized trial investigating this approach. In the trial, patients are randomized to either conventional chemoradiation treatment (60 Gy in 30 fractions) or metabolically adaptive chemoradiation, where fluorodeoxyglucose-avid tumor sub-volumes receive an integrated boost dose to a maximum of 85 Gy in 30 fractions. The trial sample size is 78 patients, and the target population is patients with newly diagnosed, inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated with radical intent chemoradiation. The primary objective of the trial is to determine if dose escalation to metabolically active sub-volumes will reduce 2-year local-regional failure rate from 42.3% to 22.3%, when compared with standard treatment. The secondary objectives are to determine the effect of dose escalation on overall survival, progression-free survival, quality of life, and rate of grade 3 to 5 toxicities.