Update of the systematic review of palliative radiation therapy fractionation for bone metastases

Fractionated radiotherapy initiated at the early stage of bone metastasis is effective to prolong survival in mouse model

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Bone metastasis is common for breast cancer and associated with poor prognosis. Currently, radiotherapy (RT) serves as the standard treatment for patients exhibiting symptoms of bone metastasis to alleviate pain. Whether earlier application of RT will better control bone metastasis remains unclear.

METHODS

We utilized a mouse model of breast cancer bone metastasis by intra-femoral injection of 4T1-luc breast tumor cells. The bone metastasis was treated by RT using various doses, timings, and modalities. Tumor growth was assessed through bioluminescence imaging, and lung metastases was quantified following lung tissue fixation. Flow cytometry was employed to analyze alterations in immune cell populations.

RESULTS

Single high-dose RT suppressed tumor growth of bone metastases, but caused severe side effects. Conversely, fractionated RT mitigated tumor growth in bone metastases with fewer adverse effects. Fractioned RT initiated at the early stage of bone metastasis effectively inhibited tumor growth in the bone, suppressed secondary lung metastases, and prolonged mouse survival. In line with the known pro- and anti-metastatic effects of neutrophils and T cells in breast cancer, respectively, earlier fractioned RT consistently decreased the proportions of neutrophils while increased the proportions of T cells in both the bone and the lung tissues.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that fractionated RT can inhibit the progression of early stage of bone metastasis and reduce secondary lung metastasis, leading to favorable outcomes. Therefore, these findings provide preclinical evidence to support the application of fractionated RT to treat patients with bone metastasis as earlier as possible.

Real-World Implementation of Simulation-Free Radiation Therapy (SFRT-1000): A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of 1000 Consecutive Palliative Courses Delivered in Routine Care

PURPOSE

The feasibility of simulation-free radiation therapy (SFRT) has been demonstrated but information regarding its routine care impact and scalability is lacking.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this single-institution, retrospective cohort study, all patients receiving palliative radiation therapy at an Australian tertiary cancer center were eligible for consideration of SFRT unless mask immobilization, a stereotactic technique, or a definitive dose was indicated. Coprimary endpoints were SFRT utilization, impact on consultation-to-RT time, and on-couch treatment duration. Timing metrics were compared with a contemporary local cohort that received simulation-based palliative radiation therapy using unadjusted Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and a propensity score-matched regression. Electronic patient-reported outcomes captured 2-week toxicity and pain response.  RESULTS:  Between April 2018 and February 2024, 2849 palliative radiation courses were delivered, of which 1904 were eligible. Of the 1904 courses, 1000 (52.5% SFRT utilization) received SFRT, including 668 using intensity-modulated radiation therapy/volumetric-modulated arc therapy. A total of 788 individual patients received SFRT and the median age was 71 years (IQR, 61-80) with 59% being male and 42% being Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group 2-4. SFRT utilization increased from 41% to 54% between years 2018-2019 and 2022-2024.  SFRT reduced median consultation-to-RT time from 7.0 to 5.1 days (P < .0001) corresponding to an adjusted average treatment effect in the treated of -2.1 days (95% CI, -2.8 to -1.3). SFRT increased median on-couch treatment duration from 17.8 to 20.5 minutes (P < .0001; adjusted average treatment effect in the treated 2.6 minutes, 95% CI, 1.3-3.9). Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 acute toxicity was 9% and at 4 weeks after RT, patients with moderate/severe pain at baseline (≥5/10) had a mean pain reduction of 3.5 points (7.1-3.6; P < .0001).  CONCLUSIONS:  Using widely available technologies, the SFRT-1000 cohort demonstrates routine care scalability with patient-centered and workflow benefits. SFRT is an attractive new paradigm implementable in most settings following adaptation to local requirements. Thus, SFRT opens new avenues to potentially improve access to palliative RT, which remains a global area of need.

Randomized phase III study comparing re-irradiation stereotactic body radiotherapy and conventional radiotherapy for painful spinal metastases: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG2211 (RESCORE study)

Bone metastases are often associated with pain and can occur in various types of cancer, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Despite the high response rates to initial conventional radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases, recurrence and inadequate response still occur. Thus, the development of a highly effective strategy for pain recurrence is crucial to improving the quality of life in patients with advanced metastatic cancer. This randomized phase III trial aims to confirm the superiority of re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (24 Gy in 2 fractions) over conventional radiotherapy (8 Gy in a single fraction) in achieving a complete pain response at 12 weeks in patients with previously irradiated painful spinal metastases. A total of 158 patients from 33 hospitals will be enrolled in Japan over 3.5 years. This trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCTs1030240172 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1030240172).

Single versus multiple fraction stereotactic spine radiosurgery for spinal metastases: a prospective randomized phase II trial

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Stereotactic spine radiosurgery (SSRS) shows potentials of better tumor and pain control for limited spinal metastases. However, the optimal schedule of SSRS is not well established and has never been investigated in a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE

To compare 2 SSRS schedules to determine which results in the lowest rate of grade 3 or higher protocol-specified adverse events at 4 months.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized phase II trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with biopsy-proven nonhematogenous malignancy and limited unirradiated spine metastases not requiring upfront spine surgery were eligible. Between November 2015 and April 2019, 69 patients were randomly assigned, yielding a total cohort of 63 analyzable patients with 79 treated spinal segments.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were the 4-month grade 3 or higher adverse events determined by the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE) definitely, probably, or possibly related to single fraction or multiple fractions spine SSRS.

METHODS

All patients at a single tertiary medical center who had radiographic evidence of limited spine metastases not requiring upfront spinal surgery were randomized to receive 16 Gy in SF or 24 Gy in 3 fractions. A post-hoc analysis was performed to assess the cumulative incidences and prognostic factors of local progression (LP) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF) by the Fine and Gray competing risk model.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (29 with 38 spinal segments in the SF arm and 34 with 41 spinal segments in the MF arm) were analyzed. Median follow-up was 16.6 months. At 4 months, none of the patients in the SF arm and 1 patient in the MF arm experienced protocol-specified grade 3 or higher toxicity. The 1-year cumulative incidence of LP was 2.6% for the SF arm and 4.9% for the MF arm, respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of VCF was 7.9% and 10.1% for the SF arm and the MF arm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both single-fraction and multifraction SSRS are safe. There was no difference in cumulative incidence of LP or VCF between 2 dose-fractionation schedules. Single-fraction SSRS is more efficient and provides the most acceptable outcome profile for all assessed endpoints.

The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MDTB) in the Management of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)

BACKGROUND

The management of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex process. Defining the disease burden, assessing the radiological response and identifying the right time for surgery or other locoregional treatments are crucial factors which can require the involvement of a multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) comprising several specialists. This study investigates the impact of MDTB on management of CRC in our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed all cases discussed by our MDTB between September 2019 and April 2023. In particular, we collected data concerning radiology, surgery and radiotherapy indication before and after MDTB meetings. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of discrepancy between pre- and post-discussion evaluations.

RESULTS

Our analysis involved 1150 cases. Median age was 64 years (16-90), 629 patients (54.7%) were male and 915 (79.5%) had metastatic disease at the time of the relevant MDTB discussion. After the meetings, 325 treatment decisions were modified, producing an overall discrepancy rate of 28.3%. In particular: (1) of 648 cases discussed for radiological assessment, 156 decisions (24.1%) were altered after a central imaging review; (2) of 327 cases considered for surgical approach, treatment strategy changed in 118 (36.1%); and (3) of the 160 cases discussed regarding radiotherapy, the treatment strategy changed in 51 of them (31.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis shows significant discrepancies between the radiology and locoregional evaluations from both before and after the MDTB meetings. Our results highlight that the discussions of a MDTB can considerably change the management of CRC, maximizing the treatment strategy.

Radiation for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: Indications, Safety, and Dose Selection

Survival outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) have drastically improved over the past two decades with the advent of highly effective biologic agents and integration of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for select patients. Despite these advances, MM remains an incurable disease and duration of remission decreases with each relapse. Palliative radiotherapy (RT) for MM, including treatment of pain, relief of compression, and prevention of fracture, is highly effective and generally well tolerated. Though RT can be delivered concurrently with biologic agents, caution should be exercised for potential added hematologic toxicity that may disrupt systemic therapy, especially in heavily pretreated patients, who have limited bone marrow reserve. In this review, we discuss the safety of RT with biologic agents (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies), review indications for palliative RT in MM, and present a framework for how to personalize RT based on goals of treatment, classification of uncomplicated versus complicated lesions, and patient and lesion characteristics. Additionally, we discuss the emerging role of bridging RT prior to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.

Development of an automated CBCT-based simulation-free platform for expedited palliative radiotherapy on a conventional linear accelerator

BACKGROUND

Conventional approaches for emergent or expedited palliative radiotherapy (RT) involve the application of cumbersome vendor-provided solutions and/or multiple patient appointments to complete the RT workflow within a compressed timeframe.

PURPOSE

This report delineates the clinical development of an in-house, semi-automated Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based simulation-free platform for expedited palliative RT on conventional linacs, intended to supplant existing techniques employed at this institution.

METHODS

The internal software, termed SimFree Wizard (SFW), was engineered utilizing a C#-based application programming interface integrated within the treatment planning system (TPS). Generated scripts were compiled as stand-alone executables, with a graphical user interface (GUI) customized via an integrated development environment. The platform was conceived as a framework for accelerated CBCT-based RT, bypassing the requirement for standard simulation imaging. SFW employs full automation where feasible to minimize user intervention, supplemented by graphical instructions for tasks requiring manual execution. During development, relevant temporal metrics from 10 end-to-end tests for palliative spine RT were quantified. User feedback was solicited via a simple questionnaire assessing the overall platform usability. Automated in-house secondary verification software was developed for validation of the TPS-calculated monitor units (MUs).

RESULTS

The mean duration for workflow execution was 41:42 ± 3:18 [mm:ss] (range ∼37-46 min). SFW satisfactorily generated simple, multi-field CBCT-based 3D treatment plans within seconds following delineation of the desired treatment area. User feedback indicated enhanced usability compared to previously employed solutions. Validation of the secondary verification software demonstrated accurate results for palliative spine RT and other simple cases wherein the dose calculation point resides in a predominantly homogenous medium.

CONCLUSION

A novel in-house solution for expedited CBCT-based RT was successfully developed, facilitating completion of the entire workflow within approximately 1-hour or less for simple palliative/emergent scenarios. Overall, this application is expected to improve the quality and safety of palliative RT while greatly reducing workflow duration, thereby improving access to palliative care.

Efficacy and tolerability of single-fraction radiotherapy for spinal bone metastases in a low-middle-income country setting: a prospective study

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the symptomatic efficacy and tolerability of three different radiotherapy (RT) regimens for patients with vertebral metastases in a low-middle-income country setting, focusing specifically on the effectiveness of single-fraction radiotherapy.

METHODS

Conducted at the National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Bangladesh, from July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021, this prospective, non-randomized study enrolled 90 patients aged 18 to 75 years with histologically confirmed primary malignancies and vertebral metastases. Patients were allocated to one of three treatment arms: 8 Gy in a single fraction (Arm A), 20 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm B), or 30 Gy in 10 fractions (Arm C). The primary endpoint was pain response at 12 weeks, assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale and International Bone Metastases Consensus. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Pain control at 12 weeks showed no significant differences among the treatment groups, with 70% of patients in Arm A, 67% in Arm B, and 70% in Arm C experiencing either partial or complete pain relief (p = 0.95). The overall survival rates were comparable across the groups (median survival, 7 months for arms A and C, 6 months for Arm B). Skin toxicity was significantly lower in Arm A (10% incidence) compared to arms B (30%) and C (47%) (p = 0.017). There were no reports of Grade 3 or higher toxicities.

CONCLUSION

The study confirms the efficacy and safety of single-fraction RT for spinal bone metastases, providing significant pain relief and lower skin toxicity relative to multiple fraction regimens. These results confirm the efficacy of single-fraction RT in the treatment of vertebral metastases also in resource-limited settings, suggesting its broader adoption to reduce toxicity and treatment burdens in low-middle-income countries.

Reirradiation - still navigating uncharted waters?

With the emergence of high-precision radiotherapy technologies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), MR guided brachytherapy, image guided intensity modulated photon and proton radiotherapy and most recently daily adaptive radiotherapy, reirradiation is increasingly recognized as a viable treatment option for many patients. This includes those with recurrent, metastatic or new malignancies post initial radiotherapy. The primary challenge in reirradiation lies in balancing tumor control against the risk of severe toxicity from cumulative radiation doses to previously irradiated normal tissue. Although technology for precise delivery has advanced at a fast pace, clinical practice of reirradiation still mostly relies on individual expertise, as prospective evidence is scarce, the level of reporting in clinical studies is not standardized and of low quality - especially with respect to cumulative doses received by organs at risk. A recent ESTRO/EORTC initiative proposed a standardized definition of reirradiation and formulated general requirements for minimal reporting in clinical studies [1]. As a consequence we found it timely to convene for an international and interdisciplinary meeting with experts in the field to summarize the current evidence, identify knowledge gaps and explore which best practices can be derived for safe reirradiation. The meeting was held on 15.06.2023 in Zurich and was endorsed by the scientific societies SASRO, DEGRO and ESTRO. Here, we report on available evidence and research priorities in the field of reirradiation, as discussed during the meeting.

Reirradiation of bone metastasis: A narrative review of the literature

Patients with bone metastasis are prevalent among those receiving palliative radiotherapy (RT), with approximately 20 % requiring reirradiation (reirradiation). The goal of bone reirradiation may be local control (oligoreoccurrence or oligoprogression of a previously treated lesion or in a previous treatment field) or symptomatic (threatening or painful progression). Published data on bone reirradiation indicate almost two-thirds of overall pain response. The primary organ at risk (especially for spine treatment) is the spinal cord. The risk of radiation myelitis is<1 % for cumulative doses of<50Gy. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and stereotactic RT (SRT) appear to be safer than three-dimensional RT (3DRT), although randomized trials comparing these techniques in reirradiation are lacking. Reirradiation requires multidisciplinary assessment. Alternative treatments for bone metastases (surgery, interventional radiology, etc.) must be considered. Patients should have a performance status≤2, with at least a 1-month interval between treatments. The planning process involves reviewing previous RT plans, cautious dose adjustments, and precise target delineation and dose distribution to minimize toxicity. Cumulative dosimetry, patient consent, and vigilant post-treatment monitoring and dose reporting are crucial.

Multi-institutional prospective observational study of radiotherapy for metastatic bone tumor

Purpose of this study is to evaluate patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes in bone metastasis radiotherapy practice. Patients for whom radiotherapy for bone metastasis was planned at 26 institutions in Japan between December 2020 and March 2021 were consecutively registered in this prospective, observational study. Study measures included patient characteristics, pain relief, skeletal-related events (SREs), overall survival and incidence of radiation-related adverse events. Pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10. Irradiated dose was analyzed by the biologically effective dose (BED) assuming α/β = 10. Overall, 232 patients were registered; 224 patients and 302 lesions were fully analyzed. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status was 0/1/2/3/4 in 23%/38%/22%/13%/4%; 59% of patients had spinal metastases and 84% had painful lesions (NRS ≥ 2). BED was <20 Gy (in 27%), 20-30 Gy (24%), 30-40 Gy (36%) and ≥ 40 Gy (13%); 9% of patients were treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 4% and no grade 4-5 toxicity was reported. Pain relief was achieved in 52% at 2 months. BED is not related to pain relief. The cumulative incidence of SREs was 6.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-9.9) at 6 months; no factors were significantly associated with SREs. With spinal lesions, 18% of patients were not ambulatory at baseline and 50% of evaluable patients in this group could walk at 2 months. The 6-month overall survival rate was 70.2% (95% CI 64.2-76.9%). In conclusion, we report real-world details of radiotherapy in bone metastasis.

Impacts of radiation therapy on quality of life and pain relief in patients with bone metastases

Bone metastases (BM) are a common complication in advanced cancer patients, significantly contributing to morbidity and mortality due to their ability to cause pain, fractures, and spinal cord compression. Radiation therapy (RT) is vital in managing these complications by targeting metastatic lesions to ease pain, improve mobility, and reduce the risk of skeletal-related events such as fractures. Evidence supports the effectiveness of RT in pain relief, showing its ability to provide significant palliation and lessen the need for opioid painkillers, thereby enhancing the overall quality of life (QoL) for patients with BM. However, optimizing RT outcomes involves considerations such as the choice of radiation technique, dose fractionation schedules, and the integration of supportive care measures to mitigate treatment-related side effects like fatigue and skin reactions. These factors highlight the importance of personalized treatment planning tailored to individual patient needs and tumor characteristics. This mini-review aims to provide comprehensive insights into the multifaceted impacts of RT on pain management and QoL enhancement in BM patients, with implications for refining clinical practices and advancing patient care through the synthesis of findings from various studies.

Classification of Patients With Painful Tumors to Predict Response to Palliative Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify factors affecting pain response to develop a patient classification system for palliative radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Our prospective observational study (UMIN000044984) provided data on patients who received palliative RT for painful tumors. The eligibility criteria were having a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 2 or more before treatment and receiving palliative RT between August 2021 and September 2022. Post-RT follow-up was scheduled prospectively at 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks. Pain response was assessed using the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints criteria, with the primary outcome being the response rate within 12 weeks. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors affecting pain response and develop the classification system. Each class evaluated the differences in response rate, time to response, and progression.

RESULTS

Of the 488 registered lesions, 366 from 261 patients met the criteria. Most patients had bone metastases (75%), of whom 72% were using opioids and 22% underwent reirradiation. Conventional RT (eg, 8-Gy single fraction, 20 Gy in 5 fractions) was administered to 93% of patients. Over a median of 6.8 months of follow-up, the average NRS decreased from 6.1 to 3.4 at 12 weeks for 273 evaluable lesions, with a 60% response rate. Opioid use and reirradiation negatively affected the response rate in multivariate analysis (P < .01). Lesions were categorized into class 1 (no opioid use and no reirradiation; 89 lesions), class 2 (neither class 1 nor 3; 211 lesions), and class 3 (opioid use and reirradiation; 66 lesions), with respective response rates of 75%, 61%, and 36% (P < .001). Time to response was similar across the classes (P = .91), but the progression rates at 24 weeks differed (11%, 27%, and 63%, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid use and reirradiation are factors leading to significant variations in pain response rates and time to progression.

External Beam Radiation Therapy for Palliation of Symptomatic Bone Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for palliative external beam radiation therapy (RT) in symptomatic bone metastases.

METHODS

The ASTRO convened a task force to address 5 key questions regarding palliative RT in symptomatic bone metastases. Based on a systematic review by the Agency for Health Research and Quality, recommendations using predefined consensus-building methodology were established; evidence quality and recommendation strength were also assessed.

RESULTS

For palliative RT for symptomatic bone metastases, RT is recommended for managing pain from bone metastases and spine metastases with or without spinal cord or cauda equina compression. Regarding other modalities with RT, for patients with spine metastases causing spinal cord or cauda equina compression, surgery and postoperative RT are conditionally recommended over RT alone. Furthermore, dexamethasone is recommended for spine metastases with spinal cord or cauda equina compression. Patients with nonspine bone metastases requiring surgery are recommended postoperative RT. Symptomatic bone metastases treated with conventional RT are recommended 800 cGy in 1 fraction (800 cGy/1 fx), 2000 cGy/5 fx, 2400 cGy/6 fx, or 3000 cGy/10 fx. Spinal cord or cauda equina compression in patients who are ineligible for surgery and receiving conventional RT are recommended 800 cGy/1 fx, 1600 cGy/2 fx, 2000 cGy/5 fx, or 3000 cGy/10 fx. Symptomatic bone metastases in selected patients with good performance status without surgery or neurologic symptoms/signs are conditionally recommended stereotactic body RT over conventional palliative RT. Spine bone metastases reirradiated with conventional RT are recommended 800 cGy/1 fx, 2000 cGy/5 fx, 2400 cGy/6 fx, or 2000 cGy/8 fx; nonspine bone metastases reirradiated with conventional RT are recommended 800 cGy/1 fx, 2000 cGy/5 fx, or 2400 cGy/6 fx. Determination of an optimal RT approach/regimen requires whole person assessment, including prognosis, previous RT dose if applicable, risks to normal tissues, quality of life, cost implications, and patient goals and values. Relatedly, for patient-centered optimization of treatment-related toxicities and quality of life, shared decision making is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on published data, the ASTRO task force's recommendations inform best clinical practices on palliative RT for symptomatic bone metastases.

Meta-Analysis of Stereotactic Body Radiation ThERapy in Nonspine BONE Metastases (MASTER-BONES)

PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with nonspine bone metastases remains in question. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate SBRT treatment outcomes in nonspine bone metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible studies were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase, Scielo, the Cochrane Library, and annual meeting proceedings through July 6, 2023. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guideline recommendations. Quantitative synthesis was performed using a random-effects model. Meta-regression was performed to determine correlation between clinical and treatment factors with the local failure (LF) and fracture rate. P values ≤.05 were deemed statistically significant.

RESULTS

Seven retrospective studies, with a total of 807 patients (1048 lesions) treated with SBRT were included, with median follow-up ranging from 7.6 to 26.5 months. The most common SBRT sites were pelvis (39.2%), ribs (25.8%), femur (16.7%), and humerus/shoulder region (8.7%). At 1 year, the LF and fracture rate were 7% (95% CI, 5.5%-8.5%; I2 = 0; n = 75/1048) and 5.3% (95% CI, 3%-7.5%; I2 = 0; n = 65/1010). The 2-year cumulative LF incidence was 12.1% (95% CI, 10%-15.5%). The overall survival and progression-free survival at 1 year were 82% (95% CI, 75%-88%; I2 = 82%; n = 746/867) and 33.5% (95% CI, 26%-41%; I2 = 0%; n = 51/152), with a median of 20.2 months (95% CI, 10.9-49.1 months) and 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.3-10.3 months) for overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between planning target volume and fracture rate (P < .05). Ribs (2.5%) followed by the femur (1.9%; 95% CI, 0%-6.1%) were the most common fracture sites. The occurrence of pain flare, fatigue, and dermatitis were 7%, 5.4%, and 0.65%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic body radiation proves both safety and efficacy for non-spine bone metastases, and although serious complications (grade 3) are rare, one case of grade 5 complication was reported. Careful consideration of target volume is crucial due to its link with a higher fracture risk.

Clinical Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Nonspinal Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

There are limited data available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for nonspinal bone metastases. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize local control (LC), overall survival (OS), pain response rates, and toxicity after SBRT. The primary outcomes were 1-year LC, incidence of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicities, and overall pain response rate at 3 months. The secondary outcome was 1-year OS. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for assessment of study bias, with a median score of 5 for included studies (range, 4-8). Weighted random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes. We identified 528 patients with 597 nonspinal bone lesions in 9 studies (1 prospective study and 8 retrospective observational studies) treated with SBRT. The estimated 1-year LC rate was 94.6% (95% CI, 87.0%-99.0%). The estimated 3-month combined partial and complete pain response rate after SBRT was 87.7% (95% CI, 55.1%-100.0%). The estimated combined acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicity rate was 0.5% (95% CI, 0%-5.0%), with an estimated pathologic fracture rate of 3.1% (95% CI, 0.2%-9.1%). The estimated 1-year OS rate was 71.0% (95% CI, 51.7%-87.0%). SBRT results in excellent LC and palliation of symptoms with minimal related toxicity. Prospective investigations are warranted to further characterize long-term outcomes of SBRT for patients with nonspinal bone metastases.

Evaluation and Management of Shoulder Dysfunction in Cancer Survivors

Purpose of Review

Shoulder dysfunction widely affects function and quality of life of cancer survivors. This paper discusses the etiology, identification, evaluation, and management of the common shoulder impairments seen in cancer survivors, particularly those with breast cancer, head and neck cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma.

Recent Findings

Shoulder dysfunction can be caused by a wide range of sources, often as a sequelae of cancer treatments including surgery, systemic therapy, and radiation therapy. These can change the shoulder biomechanics leading to musculoskeletal disorders such as rotator cuff disease and adhesive capsulitis. Other etiologies include neuromuscular complications, such as post-breast surgery pain syndrome and radiation fibrosis syndrome, and lymphovascular disorders such as lymphedema and axillary web syndrome. Metastatic bone disease and primary bone cancer should be considered for those with intense shoulder pain. Detailed history and physical exam, and in some cases, imaging can assist with evaluation of shoulder issues. Exercise, physical and occupation therapy are essential in managing shoulder dysfunction.

Summary

Shoulder dysfunction can limit function and quality of life for cancer survivors. It is important to consider the possible etiologies as accurate diagnosis is critical for optimal treatment.

Palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions in patients with advanced cancer: a single center retrospective study

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions in patients with advanced cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled patients with painful non-bone lesions who underwent conventional palliative radiotherapy between September 2018 and September 2022. The treatment targets included primary tumor lesions, lymph node metastases, non-bone hematogenous metastases, and other lesions. The primary endpoint was the overall pain response rate in evaluable patients, determined based on the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoint criteria. The secondary endpoints included overall survival, pain recurrence, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 420 screened patients, 142 received palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions, and 112 were evaluable. A pain response was achieved in 67 patients (60%) of the 112 evaluable patients within a median of 1.2 months. Among these patients, 25 exhibited complete response, 42 partial response, 18 indeterminate response, and 27 pain progression. The median survival time was 5.5 months, recorded at a median follow-up of 6.0 months, during which 67 patients died. Multivariate analysis identified poor performance status scores of 2-4, opioid use, and re-irradiation as independent factors associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving a pain response. Pain recurrence occurred in 18 patients over a median of 4.1 months. Seventeen patients had grade 1-2 adverse events, while none experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Palliative radiotherapy can potentially be a safe and well-tolerated modality for managing painful non-bone lesions, with a low rate of adverse events.

Pain response in single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy for painful non-bone-metastasis tumors: a single-center retrospective study

The effectiveness of single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy for painful bone metastases has been verified in numerous randomized controlled trials. However, few reports have described the effectiveness of single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy in painful tumors other than bone metastases. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the pain response to single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy in painful non-bone-metastasis tumors. We included patients who had received single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy for such tumors between January 2017 and December 2022, excluding those with brain metastases, hematological tumors and those who received re-irradiation. Pain response assessment was based on the best responses documented in the medical records and conducted by two radiation oncologists. A total of 36 eligible patients were included in this study. The irradiation sites included primary lesions in eight patients, lymph node metastases in eight, muscle metastases in seven, pleural dissemination in four, skin/subcutaneous metastases in four and other sites in five. Pain response was assessed in 24 patients after radiotherapy. Pain response rate was 88% in evaluable patients; 21 of the 24 patients experienced response. The median assessment date for pain response was 37 days (range: 8-156 days) after radiotherapy. Re-irradiation was performed in four patients (11%). Single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy seemed to be a promising treatment option for painful non-bone-metastasis tumors and warrants further investigation.

Methodological guide for assessing the carbon footprint of external beam radiotherapy: A single-center study with quantified mitigation strategies

Background and purposes

Data on the carbon footprint of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) are scarce. Reliable and exhaustive data, including a detailed carbon inventory, are needed to determine effective mitigation strategies.

Materials and methods

This study proposes a methodology for calculating the carbon footprint of EBRT and applies it to a single center. Mitigation strategies are derived from the carbon inventory, and their potential reductions are quantified whenever possible.

Results

The average emission per treatment and fraction delivered was 489 kg CO₂eq and 27 kg CO₂eq, respectively. Patient transportation (43 %) and the construction and maintenance of linear accelerators (LINACs) and scanners (17 %) represented the most significant components. Electricity, the only energy source used, accounted for only 2 % of emissions.Derived mitigation strategies include a data deletion policy (reducing emissions in 30 years by 12.5 %), geographical appropriateness (-12.2 %), transportation mode appropriateness (-9.3 %), hypofractionation (-5.9 %), decrease in manufacturers' carbon footprint (-5.2 %), and an increase in machine durability (-3.5 %).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that a significant reduction in the carbon footprint of a radiotherapy unit can be achieved without compromising the quality of care.This study provides a methodology and a starting point for comparison and proposes and quantifies mitigation strategies, paving the way for others to follow.

The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for radiation treatment of breast cancer, 2022 edition

The Breast Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines, organized by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS), were published in 2022. We present the English version of the Radiation Therapy (RT) section of the guidelines. The JBCS formed a task force to update the 2018 version of the JBCS Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Background Questions (BQs) contain the standard treatments for breast cancer in clinical practice, whereas the Clinical Questions (CQs) address daily clinical questions that remain controversial. Future Research Questions (FRQs) explore the subjects that are considered important issues, despite there being insufficient data for inclusion as CQs. The task force selected the 12 BQs, 8 CQs, and 6 FRQs for the RT section. For each CQ, systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses were conducted according to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020, version 3.0. The recommendations, strength of recommendation, and strength of evidence for each CQ were determined based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and finalized by voting at the recommendation decision meeting.

An Update on the Management of Bone Metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasing life expectancy among patients with advanced cancer has placed a greater emphasis on optimizing pain control and quality of life. Concurrently, significant advancements in radiotherapy for bone metastases have permitted for dose escalation strategies such as stereotactic radiotherapy. This review aims to provide updated information on the management of bone metastases in light of these developments.

RECENT FINDINGS

We reviewed recent studies regarding the role and details of external beam radiotherapy for bone metastases, with emphasis on differences by treatment site as well as intention (palliative versus ablative for oligometastases). Conventional palliative radiotherapy remains a mainstay of management. While stereotactic radiotherapy may augment durability of pain relief and even survival time, there are significant questions remaining regarding optimal dosing and patient selection. Radiotherapy for bone metastases continues to evolve, particularly with increasing use of stereotactic radiotherapy. Future studies are needed to clarify optimal dose, fractionation, modality, and patient selection criteria among different radiotherapy approaches.

Deterioration of Performance Status during Palliative Radiotherapy Suggests a Significant Short Survival Duration: Indicating the Necessities for Considering Radiotherapy Discontinuation

Discontinuation of palliative radiotherapy due to a patient's declining general condition poses a clinical dilemma for palliative care physicians. This study aimed to investigate the survival duration of patients whose performance status (PS) deteriorated during palliative radiotherapy and inform decisions regarding early treatment discontinuation. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients referred from our institute's palliative care department who underwent ≥10 fractions of palliative radiotherapy between March 2017 and December 2021. PS was assessed using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale. Survival duration was calculated from the final day of palliative radiotherapy to death using the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 35 patients underwent palliative radiotherapy. Seven (20%) experienced deterioration in ECOG PS during treatment. Their median survival duration was significantly shorter at 22 days (95% confidence interval: 1-94 days) compared to 125 days (95% confidence interval: 82-150 days) for the 28 patients whose PS remained stable (p = 0.0007). Deterioration in ECOG PS during palliative radiotherapy signifies a markedly shorter survival duration. Careful assessment of a patient's condition throughout treatment is crucial, and early discontinuation should be considered if their general health worsens rather than strictly adhering to the initial schedule.

Stereotactic Body and Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are commonly used treatment options for relieving metastatic bone pain. The effectiveness of SBRT compared with cEBRT in pain relief has been a subject of debate, and conflicting results have been reported.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness associated with SBRT vs cEBRT for relieving metastatic bone pain.

Data Sources

A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases on June 5, 2023. Additionally, results were added from a new randomized clinical trial (RCT) and additional unpublished data from an already published RCT.

Study Selection

Comparative studies reporting pain response after SBRT vs cEBRT in patients with painful bone metastases.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two independent reviewers extracted data from eligible studies. Data were extracted for the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. The study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall and complete pain response at 1, 3, and 6 months after radiotherapy, according to the study's definition. Relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for each study. A random-effects model using a restricted maximum likelihood estimator was applied for meta-analysis.

Results

There were 18 studies with 1685 patients included in the systematic review and 8 RCTs with 1090 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In 7 RCTs, overall pain response was defined according to the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints in clinical trials (ICPRE). The complete pain response was reported in 6 RCTs, all defined according to the ICPRE. The ITT meta-analyses showed that the overall pain response rates did not differ between cEBRT and SBRT at 1 (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.99-1.30), 3 (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96-1.47), or 6 (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.96-1.54) months. However, SBRT was associated with a higher complete pain response at 1 (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.01), 3 (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16-2.78), and 6 (RR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.24-4.91) months after radiotherapy. The PP meta-analyses showed comparable results.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with painful bone metastases experienced similar overall pain response after SBRT compared with cEBRT. More patients had complete pain alleviation after SBRT, suggesting that selected subgroups will benefit from SBRT.

Palliative radiotherapy is effective for both well- and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

The outcomes of palliative radiation therapy (RT) for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are seldom reported. We investigated outcomes following palliative radiotherapy in a cohort of patients with NENs. We hypothesised that well-differentiated NEN will be less likely to have a clinical response than poorly differentiated NEN.

METHODS

Patients who received at least one course of palliative RT were identified using the New Zealand NETwork! Registry. Patients with Merkel cell carcinoma, pulmonary small cell carcinoma or asymptomatic patients were excluded. Clinical response to RT within 90 days and overall survival were analysed alongside clinical variables (fractionation, RT site, tumour differentiation and tumour primary site).

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 79 patients, with 147 courses of palliative RT delivered. Clinical response was measurable for 100 courses, with clinical response rate of 76%. A course delivered to a well-differentiated NEN was associated with 2.02-fold (95% CI 0.67, 6.12; P = 0.21) increase in odds of a clinical response compared to a poorly differentiated NEN. Median overall survival from the first fraction of RT was 94 days (95% CI 80, 138 days). Overall survival was higher in well-differentiated NEN than in poorly differentiated NEN (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.10-0.40, P-value < 0.001); 30-day mortality was 7%. There were significantly reduced odds of clinical response for non-bone sites, and for courses >10 fractions compared to a single fraction.

CONCLUSION

Palliative RT is an appropriate option for management of symptoms in patients with both well- and poorly differentiated metastatic NEN.

Treatment and Management of the Clinical Manifestations of Advanced Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

People with advanced breast cancer (ABC) experience complex and debilitating physical symptoms of their disease that can have a profound effect on quality of life. This report provides an overview of the clinical manifestations related to different metastatic sites in ABC and potential oncologic emergencies.

DATA SOURCES

Date sources include peer-reviewed papers sourced in electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar) and national and international best practice guidelines.

CONCLUSION

People living with ABC experience multiple symptoms of disease that can impact on quality of life and physical functioning. The most common sites of metastatic disease are bone, lung, liver and brain. Clinical manifestations of ABC include pain, pathologic fractures, pleural effusions, and ascites. Potential oncologic emergencies related to these metastatic sites include hypercalcemia, malignant spinal cord compression, superior vena cava obstruction, and raised intracranial pressure.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

It is important for nurses to have informed knowledge and understanding of these clinical manifestations. This will enable them to be vigilant and perform targeted patient evaluation to assess signs and symptoms with a view to identifying potentially life-threatening emergencies and initiating interventions or appropriate referral or follow-up accordingly.

[Acute spinal cord compression under systemic therapy - radiotherapy or surgery?]

Vertebral bodies are one of the most common metastasis sites found in advanced prostate cancer and have a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Spinal metastases frequently cause severe back pain and in some occasions can lead to secondary complications, with serious neurological deficits and loss of function. The main treatment goals include adequate pain management, controlling tumour growth and restoring spinal stability. Publications on the role of surgery - both conventional and stereotactic radiotherapy, and either as an individual modality or in combination - have been inconclusive. The NOMS score has proven to be useful in making treatment decisions. Existing data show better outcomes in patients with surgical therapy, both when performed in isolation and also combined with radiotherapy, in which some of the cohorts studied including patients with primary cancer other than prostate cancer. Comparative studies that specifically investigate the superiority of specific therapy modalities for metastatic prostate carcinoma are scarce. Similarly, there are limited data on microsurgical interventions for spinal metastases. Radiotherapy alone is crucial in the setting of palliation, especially for pain relief, and its effectiveness has been shown in many studies. The patient's life expectancy plays a crucial role in deciding the most appropriate treatment approach. Given the complexity of the patient population, a multimodal therapy approach is necessary. Current trends in therapy favour greater use of surgical interventions, particularly in the early detection of spinal metastases.

Incidence and radiotherapy treatment patterns of complicated bone metastases

Background

Despite the encouraging results of the SCORAD trial, single fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) remains underused for patients with complicated bone metastases with rates as low as 18-39%. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and treatment patterns of these metastases in patients being referred to a tertiary centre for palliative radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective review of all bone metastases treated at our centre from January 2013 until December 2017. Lesions were classified as uncomplicated or complicated. Complicated was defined as associated with (impending) fracture, existing spinal cord or cauda equina compression. Our protocol suggests using SFRT for all patients with complicated bone metastases, except for those with symptomatic neuraxial compression and a life expectancy of ≥28 weeks.

Results

Overall, 37 % of all bone metastases were classified as complicated. Most often as a result of an (impending) fracture (56 %) or spinal cord compression (44 %). In 93 % of cases, complicated lesions were located in the spine, most commonly originating from prostate, breast and lung cancer (60 %). Median survival of patients with complicated bone metastases was 4 months. The use of SFRT for complicated bone metastases increased from 51 % to 85 % over the study period, reaching 100 % for patients with the poorest prognosis.

Conclusions

Approximately 37 % of bone metastases are classified as complicated with the majority related to (impending) fracture. Patients with complicated bone metastases have a median survival of 4 months and were mostly treated with SFRT.

Optimizing Clinical Implementation of Hypofractionation: Comprehensive Evidence Synthesis and Practical Guidelines for Low- and Middle-Income Settings

The global cancer burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), worsens existing disparities, amplified by the rising costs of advanced treatments. The shortage of radiation therapy (RT) services is a significant issue in LMICs. Extended conventional treatment regimens pose significant challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT) and ultra-hypofractionated/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offer promising alternatives by shortening treatment durations. This approach optimizes the utilization of radiotherapy machines, making them more effective in meeting the growing demand for cancer care. Adopting HRT/SBRT holds significant potential, especially in LMICs. This review provides the latest clinical evidence and guideline recommendations for the application of HRT/SBRT in the treatment of breast, prostate, and lung cancers. It emphasizes the critical importance of rigorous training, technology, stringent quality assurance, and safety protocols to ensure precise and secure treatments. Additionally, it addresses practical considerations for implementing these treatments in LMICs, highlighting the need for comprehensive support and collaboration to enhance patient access to advanced cancer care.

Short-term pain control after palliative radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases: a prospective cohort study

This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of different radiotherapy (RT) fractionation regimens in managing uncomplicated painful bone metastases (BM) and identifying predictive factors for pain control. Patients with 1 to 4 symptomatic BM from any primary solid tumors and a life expectancy exceeding 3 months were included in the study and received palliative RT, with SBRT restricted in the context of oligometastatic disease or in patients with good prognosis. Pain analysis using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) tool was conducted at baseline, 1 and 3 months after RT. Analgesic intake was recorded as morphine-equivalent doses (OME). Pain response was assessed using the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoint (ICPRE). Multivariate logistic regression analyzed patient-related, tumor-related, and treatment-related factors predicting BM pain control at 3 months post-RT. From Feb 2022 to Feb 2023, 44 patients with 65 symptomatic BM were investigated. Breast (32%) and lung (24%) tumors were the most common primary tumors. Treatment plans included 3DCRT (60%) and VMAT (40%), with a median biological effective dose for tumors (BED) of 29 Gy [14-108]. All patients completed the 3-month follow-up. Pain response rates were 62% at 1 month and 60% at 3 months. Responders had better PS ECOG scores (67%; P = 0.008) and received active systemic therapies (67%: P = 0.036). Non-responders had lower pretreatment BPI (mean: 13.7 vs. 58.2; P = 0.032), with significantly higher values after 1 month (mean: 9.1 vs. 5.3, P = 0.033). Baseline BPI (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.032-1.327; P = 0.014) and BPI at 1 month (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.698-0.976; P = 0.025) were independent predictors of pain response at 3 months. Our findings show that palliative RT ensured short-term pain control in patients with BM, regardless of tumor type and dose-fractionation regimen. A larger sample size and a longer follow-up could potentially identify which patients are likely to benefit most from RT, and which fractionation might be indicated for achieving a durable pain relief. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount to provide a better care to BM patients.

Dosimetric Comparison of Conventional Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, and Proton Beam Therapy for Palliation of Thoracic Spine Metastases Secondary to Breast or Prostate Cancer

The aim of this planning study was to compare the dosimetric outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Proton Beam Therapy (PBT), and conventional External Beam Radiation Therapy (cEBRT) in the treatment of thoracic spinal metastases originating from breast or prostate cancer. Our study utilized data from 30 different treatment plans and evaluated target coverage and doses to vital organs at risk (OARs), such as the spinal cord, heart, esophagus, and lungs. The results showed that VMAT and PBT achieved superior target coverage and significantly lower doses to the spinal cord compared to cEBRT (target: median PTVD95%: 75.2 for cEBRT vs. 92.9 and 91.7 for VMAT (p < 0.001) and PBT (p < 0.001), respectively; spinal cord: median Dmax%: 105.1 for cEBRT vs. 100.4 and 103.6 for VMAT (p < 0.001) and PBT (p = 0.002), respectively). Specifically, VMAT was notable for its superior target coverage and PBT for significantly lower doses to heart, lungs, and esophagus. However, VMAT resulted in higher lung doses, indicating potential trade-offs among different techniques. The study demonstrated the relative advantages of VMAT and PBT over traditional RT in the palliative treatment of spinal metastases using conventional fractionation. These findings underscore the potential of VMAT and PBT to improve dosimetric outcomes, suggesting that they may be more suitable for certain patient groups for whom the sparing of specific OARs is especially important.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spine Oligometastases: A Multicentre Retrospective Study From the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine oligometastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicentre retrospective study of a series of patients who received SBRT for spine oligometastases. The efficacy of SBRT was evaluated in terms of local control as the primary endpoint. Survival outcomes were also analysed to identify predictive factors for clinical outcomes. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0.

RESULTS

Between March 2018 and July 2022, 183 lesions in 177 patients were analysed. In most patients, SBRT was delivered to a single spine metastasis (82%) for a median total dose of 21 Gy (14-35 Gy) in three fractions (one to five fractions) and a median BED10 = 119 Gy (57.7-152 Gy). Local control rates were 90.3% at 1 year, 84.3% at 2 years and 84.3% at 3 years. Distant progression-free survival rates were 33.1%, 18.5% and 12.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, with prostate histology (P = 0.023), oligorecurrent disease (P = 0.04) and BED10 > 100 Gy (P = 0.04) found to be predictive on univariate analysis. A further oligometastatic progression was observed in 33 patients (18.6%) treated with a second course of SBRT, reporting at univariate analysis improved overall survival rates (P = 0.01). Polymetastases-free survival rates were 57.8%, 43.4% and 32.4%; concurrent therapy was related to improved outcomes at multivariate analysis (P = 0.009). Overall survival rates were 91.8%, 79.6% and 65.9%, with prostate histology and non-cervical metastases related to better overall survival at multivariate analysis. Pain-flare after SBRT was recorded in 3.3%; five patients underwent surgical decompression after SBRT; there were no grade ≥3 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience of only oligometastatic patients, spine SBRT gave excellent results in terms of safety and efficacy. Prostate histology and oligorecurrent disease were predictive factors for improved clinical outcomes; also, patients who experienced a further oligoprogression after SBRT maintained a survival advantage compared with polymetastatic progression. No severe adverse events were reported.

Clinical trials that will change practices: News in palliative radiotherapy

Palliative radiotherapy is used to alleviate cancer-related symptoms. Symptomatic responses to palliative radiotherapy may however take several weeks, meaning that patients need to survive long enough to derive a real benefit. Oncologists can be optimistic when estimating survival for patients with advanced cancer and as a consequence some patients receiving palliative radiotherapy die before experiencing any gain. Models of patient survival have limited accuracy, particularly for predicting whether patients will die within the next 30 days. Dedicated rapid access palliative radiotherapy clinics, in which patients are assessed, simulated and treated on the same day, reduce the number of patient visits to the radiation oncology department and hence the burden on the patient as well as costs. Teleconsultation and advanced practice nurses can play a crucial role in providing rapid access to palliative radiotherapy in a dedicated palliative radiotherapy service. Single-fraction palliative radiotherapy should be offered to eligible patients if they are able to attend treatment and could potentially benefit from symptom palliation, irrespective of predicted life expectancy. Technical and organizational innovations have been proposed in order to dispense with the computed tomography scanner by carrying out the dosimetry on a recent diagnostic scanner or a magnetic resonance imaging scanner with integrated linear acceleration system. Stereotactic body radiation therapy makes it possible to envisage greater and more lasting analgesic benefits in patients with painful bone metastasis and good prognosis. Flash radiotherapy remains at the preclinical stage.

Treatment outcomes of radiotherapy for malignant psoas syndrome: A single-center retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of radiotherapy for symptomatic relief of malignant psoas syndrome (MPS) remains unknown because there are limited publications with high level evidence, including analyses with sufficient number of cases, clinical trials, and systematic reviews about radiotherapy for MPS. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of and symptom relief rates in patients treated with radiotherapy for MPS in palliative intent.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed data of 22 consecutive patients treated with radiotherapy for MPS at our institution in Japan between 2012 and 2022. We recorded patient characteristics, including primary site, invasion pattern, recognition of MPS by the attending physician, radiation regimen, biological effective dose with α/β = 10 Gy (BED10), and adverse events. Since no objective evaluation index for palliative radiotherapy for non-bone metastases has been established, we modified and used an International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoint, which was originally used for bone metastases, to evaluate symptom relief in the present retrospective study. "Response" was defined as symptom relief described in medical records or the use of analgesic medications reduced by ≥25% within 3 months post-initiation of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Genitourinary organs (41%) were the most common primary-tumor sites. MPS was caused by metastasis in the iliopsoas muscle in 14 patients (64%) and by direct invasion of the primary tumor in eight patients (36%). Since the optimal radiation dose for MPS has not been established, the radiation dose varied from low dose, which are used in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases, to high dose with conventional fraction using 1.8 to 2 Gy per fraction, with a median BED10 of 48 Gy (range, 10.6-79.2 Gy). Fifteen patients (68%) achieved a response. No acute nor late adverse events of grade 2 or higher, according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, were reported during the observation period.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy for symptomatic MPS might be an effective treatment option with a high response rate (68%) and minimal adverse events. Since the present study is a retrospective study with small number of cases, a prospective study with a larger sample size is required.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases: 12 years of a single center experience

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical outcomes of patients with spine metastases treated with SBRT at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with spine metastases treated with SBRT (1 fraction/18 Gy or 5 fractions/7 Gy) during the last 12 years have been analyzed. All patients were simulated supine in a vacuum cushion or with a shoulder mask. CT scans and MRI image registration were performed. Contouring was based on International Spine-Radiosurgery-Consortium-Consensus-Guidelines. Highly conformal-techniques (IMRT/VMAT) were used for treatment planning. Intra and interfraction (CBCT or X-Ray-ExacTrac) verification were mandatory.

RESULTS

From February 2010 to January 2022, 129 patients with spinal metastases were treated with SBRT [1 fraction/18 Gy (75%) or 5 fractions/7 Gy] (25%). For patients with painful metastases (74/129:57%), 100% experienced an improvement in pain after SBRT. With a median follow-up of 14.2 months (average 22.9; range 0.5-140) 6 patients (4.6%) experienced local relapse. Local progression-free survival was different, considering metastases's location (p < 0.04). The 1, 2 and 3 years overall survival (OS) were 91.2%, 85.1% and 83.2%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly better for patients with spine metastases of breast and prostate cancers compared to other tumors (p < 0.05) and significantly worse when visceral metastases were present (p < 0.05), when patients were metastatic de novo (p < 0.05), and in those patients receiving single fraction SBRT (p: 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our experience, SBRT for patients with spinal metastases was effective in terms of local control and useful to reach pain relief. Regarding the intent of the treatment, an adequate selection of patients is essential to propose this ablative approach.

Radiation Therapy in the Last Month of Life: Association With Aggressive Care at the End of Life

CONTEXT

Half of the patients with cancer who undergo radiation therapy do so with palliative intent.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the proportion of undergoing radiation in the last month of life, patient characteristics, cancer course, the type and duration of radiation, whether palliative care was involved, and the of radiation with aggressive cancer care metrics.

METHODS

One thousand seven hundred twenty-seven patients who died of cancer between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, were included. Demographics, cancer stage, palliative care referral, advance directives, use of home health care, radiation timing, and survival were collected. Type of radiation, course, and intent were reviewed. Chi-square analysis was utilized for categorical variables, and Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables. A stepwise selection was used to build a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-three patients underwent radiation in the last month of life. Younger patients underwent radiation 67.3 years (SD 11.52) versus 69.2 years (SD 11.96). 42.6% had radiation within two weeks of death. The average fraction number was 5.5. Individuals undergoing radiation were more likely to start chemotherapy within the last 30 days of life, continue chemotherapy within two weeks of death, be admitted to the ICU, and have two or more hospitalizations or emergency room visits. Survival measured from the date of diagnosis was shorter for those undergoing radiation, 122 days (IQR 58-462) versus 474 days (IQR 225-1150). Palliative care consultations occurred later in those undergoing radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy in the last month of life occurs in younger patients with rapidly progressive cancer, who are subject to more aggressive cancer care, and have late palliative care consults.

Dosimetric evaluation of a spinal cord dose-limiting 3D-CRT technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the possible advantages of a simple spinal cord (SC) dose-limiting three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) technique in comparison to conventional two-dimensional (2D) techniques and other 3D-CRT techniques for spinal bone irradiation.

METHODS

For 41 spinal target volumes, seven different techniques were evaluated, using a standard schedule of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The SC dose-limiting 3D-CRT technique 1F2S-18MV using a single posterior field (F) supplemented by two anterior segment fields (S) and 18-MV photon beams was compared to two conventional 2D techniques (a single posterior field, PA, and two opposed anterior-posterior fields, APPA), three other 3D-CRT techniques (a single posterior field supplemented by four segment fields, 1F4S; two wedged fields, WD, and the SC dose-limiting variant using 6 MV, 1F2S-6MV) along with the original clinically applied plans.

RESULTS

1F2S-18MV demonstrated notably better results for all target volume parameters compared to the conventional 2D techniques (p < 0.001). Limitation of the SC dose was significantly superior with 1F2S-18MV in comparison to PA and APPA (SC Dmean: 28.9 ± 0.4  vs. 30.1 ± 0.6 Gy and 30.1 ± 0.4 Gy; SC Dmax: 30.9 ± 0.7  vs. 32.5 ± 1.0 Gy and 31.8 ± 0.7 Gy; SC D1cm3 : 30.1 ± 0.6  vs. 31.7 ± 0.9 Gy and 31.1 ± 0.6 Gy; p < 0.001). Likewise, lower mean SC doses with 1F2S-18MV were observed in comparison to the more treatment time-consuming 3D-CRT techniques (1F4S, WD) and the original plans without relevant compromises on the dose homogeneity in the target volume and the dose exposure to the other OARs.

CONCLUSION

In treatment planning of spinal metastases, simple variants of 3D-CRT-techniques like 1F2S-18MV can offer a significant dose limitation to the SC while providing a sufficient dose coverage of the target volume. Especially in patients with favorable life expectancy and potential need for re-irradiation, such SC dose-limiting 3D-CRT techniques may be a reasonable approach.

Randomized controlled study of pain education in patients receiving radiotherapy for painful bone metastases

BACKGROUND

Although short-course radiotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with painful bone metastases, pain is not always sufficiently controlled. We therefore investigated the additional effect of a nurse-led pain education program on pain control and quality of life (QoL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter study, patients with solid tumor bone metastases and a worst pain intensity of ≥5 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) were randomized between care as usual (control-group) and care as usual plus the Pain Education Program (PEP-group). PEP consisted of a structured interview and personalized education with follow-up phone calls. Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory, EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and BM22 at week 0, 1, 4, 8 and 12. The primary outcome was pain control, defined as the number of patients whose worst pain intensity was <5 on a 0-10 NRS after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to reach control of pain (NRS < 5), mean worst pain and average pain, and QoL at weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12.

RESULTS

Of 308 included patients, 182 (92 PEP-group) completed 12 weeks follow-up. At 12 weeks, more patients in the PEP-group (71%) compared to the control-group (52%) reported pain control (P =.008). In the PEP-group, pain control was reached earlier than in the control-group (median 29 days versus 56 days; P =.003). Mean worst and average pain decreased in both groups but decreased more in the PEP-group. QoL did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The addition of PEP to care as usual for patients treated with radiotherapy for painful bone metastases resulted in less pain and faster pain control.

What did COVID-19 pandemics teach us about single-fraction radiotherapy for painful bone metastases-State of the art or undertreatment?

BACKGROUND

Choosing the optimal treatment approach for patients with painful bone metastases during the COVID-19 pandemic became challenging. A simple technique, single fraction radiotherapy was recommended for these patients usually referring to bone metastases as a single entity, although it is a very heterogeneous group of patients.

AIM

This study aimed to analyze the response to palliative single fraction radiotherapy in relation to age, performance status, primary tumor, histopathology, and bone localization in the group of patients with painful bone metastases.

METHODS

A clinical, prospective, non-randomized study was conducted at the Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, which included 64 patients with noncomplicated, painful bone metastases who underwent palliative, pain-relieving radiation therapy with a single tumor dose of 8Gy in a single hospital visit. Response to treatment was patient reported via telephone interview using visual analog scale. The response assessment was based on the international consensus panel of radiation oncologists.

RESULTS

In the entire group of patients, 83% responded to radiotherapy. No statistically significant difference was observed in response to therapy, time to reach the maximum response, degree of pain reduction, nor in response duration depending on the patient's age, performance status, the primary origin of the tumor, histopathology, or location of the metastasis (bone) that was irradiated.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of clinical parameters, palliative radiotherapy with a single dose of 8Gy can be considered very effective in quick pain relief in patients with noncomplicated painful bone metastases. Single fraction radiotherapy in a single hospital visit, as well as patient-reported outcome for these patients may be considered favorable beyond Covid pandemics.

A Comprehensive Review of Interventional Clinical Trials in Patients with Bone Metastases

Bone metastasis is one of the most important factors associated with poor prognosis for patients with prostate, breast, thyroid, and lung cancer. In the past two decades, 651 clinical trials, including 554 interventional trials, were being registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and pharma.id.informa.com to combat bone metastases from different perspectives. In this review, we comprehensively analyzed, regrouped, and discussed all the interventional trials on bone metastases. Clinical trials were re-grouped into bone-targeting agents, radiotherapy, small molecule targeted therapy, combination therapy, and others, based on the different mechanisms of action including modifying the bone microenvironment and preventing the growth of cancer cells. We also discussed the potential strategies that might improve overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with bone metastases in the future.

The Role of Post-Operative Radiotherapy for Non-Spine Bone Metastases (NSBMs)

Non-spine bone metastases (NSBMs) can cause significant morbidity and deterioration in the quality of life of cancer patients. This paper reviews the role of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) in the management of NSBMs and provides suggestions for clinical practice based on the best available evidence. We identified six retrospective studies and several reviews that examined PORT for NSBMs. These studies suggest that PORT reduces local recurrence rates and provides effective pain relief. Based on the literature, PORT was typically delivered as 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions within 5 weeks of surgery. Complete coverage of the surgical hardware is an important consideration when designing an appropriate radiation plan and leads to improved local control. Furthermore, the integration of PORT in a multidisciplinary team with input from radiation oncologists and orthopedic surgeons is beneficial. A multimodal approach including PORT should be considered for an NSBM that requires surgery. However, phase III studies are needed to answer many remaining questions and optimize the management of NSBMs.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases: Benefits and Limitations

Progress in biological cancer characterization, targeted systemic therapies and multimodality treatment strategies have shifted the goals of radiotherapy for spinal metastases from short-term palliation to long-term symptom control and prevention of compilations. This article gives an overview of the spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) methodology and clinical results of SBRT in cancer patients with painful vertebral metastases, metastatic spinal cord compression, oligometastatic disease and in a reirradiation situation. Outcomes after dose-intensified SBRT are compared with results of conventional radiotherapy and patient selection criteria will be discussed. Though rates of severe toxicity after spinal SBRT are low, strategies to minimize the risk of vertebral compression fracture, radiation induced myelopathy, plexopathy and myositis are summarized, to optimize the use of SBRT in multidisciplinary management of vertebral metastases.

Initial experience, feasibility, and technical development with an electromagnetic navigation assistance in percutaneous pelvic bone cementoplasty: retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility and technical outcomes of pelvic bone cementoplasty using an electromagnetic navigation system (EMNS) in standard practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Monocentric retrospective study of all consecutive patients treated with cementoplasty or reinforced cementoplasty of the pelvic bone with EMNS-assisted procedures. The endpoints were periprocedural adverse events, needle repositioning rates, procedure duration, and radiation exposure.

RESULTS

A detailed description of the technical steps is provided. Thirty-three patients (68 years ± 10) were treated between February 2016 and February 2020. Needle repositioning was required for 1/33 patients (3%). The main minor technical adverse event was soft tissue PMMA cement leaks. No major adverse event was noted. The median number of CT acquisitions throughout the procedures was 4 (range: 2 to 8). Radiation exposure and mean procedure duration are provided.

CONCLUSION

Electromagnetic navigation system-assisted percutaneous interventions for the pelvic bone are feasible and lead to low rates of minor technical adverse events and needle repositioning. Procedure duration and radiation exposure were low.

KEY POINTS

• Initial experience for 33 patients treated with an electromagnetic navigation assistance for pelvic cementoplasty shows feasibility and safety. • The use of an electromagnetic navigation system does not expose to high procedure duration or radiation exposure. • The system is efficient in assisting the radiologist for extra-axial planes in challenging approaches.

Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: Fractionation, Recalcification, and Symptom Control

Bone is a common site for metastases, which may cause pain and other skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with advanced cancer. Since the 1980s, prospective clinical trials have demonstrated the high efficacy of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for pain relief from focal, symptomatic lesions. In uncomplicated bone metastases, which include those without pathologic fracture, evidence of cord compression, or prior surgical intervention, improvement or complete pain relief with radiotherapy is as high as 60%, with no difference in efficacy when radiotherapy is delivered in a single or multiple fractions. The ability to treat with a single fraction makes EBRT an attractive therapy even for patients with poor performance status and/or life expectancy. Even in patients with complicated bone metastases (eg cord compression), several randomized trials have demonstrated similar rates of pain relief in addition to improved functional outcomes such as ambulation. In this review, we summarize the role of EBRT for alleviating painful bone metastases and explore its role for other endpoints including functional outcomes, recalcification, and prevention of SREs.

Radiation Therapy at the End of-Life: Quality of Life and Financial Toxicity Considerations

In patients with advanced cancer, radiation therapy is considered at various time points in the patient's clinical course from diagnosis to death. As some patients are living longer with metastatic cancer on novel therapeutics, radiation oncologists are increasingly using radiation therapy as an ablative therapy in appropriately selected patients. However, most patients with metastatic cancer still eventually die of their disease. For those without effective targeted therapy options or those who are not candidates for immunotherapy, the time frame from diagnosis to death is still relatively short. Given this evolving landscape, prognostication has become increasingly challenging. Thus, radiation oncologists must be diligent about defining the goals of therapy and considering all treatment options from ablative radiation to medical management and hospice care. The risks and benefits of radiation therapy vary based on an individual patient's prognosis, goals of care, and the ability of radiation to help with their cancer symptoms without undue toxicity over the course of their expected lifetime. When considering recommending a course of radiation, physicians must broaden their understanding of risks and benefits to include not only physical symptoms, but also various psychosocial burdens. These include financial burdens to the patient, to their caregiver and to the healthcare system. The burden of time spent at the end-of-life receiving radiation therapy must also be considered. Thus, the consideration of radiation therapy at the end-of-life can be complex and requires careful attention to the whole patient and their goals of care.

Evaluation of a workflow for cone-beam CT-guided online adaptive palliative radiotherapy planned using diagnostic CT scans

PURPOSE

Single-visit radiotherapy (RT) is beneficial for patients requiring pain control and can limit interruptions to systemic treatments. However, the requirement for a dedicated planning CT (pCT)-scan can result in treatment delays. We developed a workflow involving preplanning on available diagnostic CT (dCT) imaging, followed by online plan adaption using a cone-beam CT (CBCT)-scan prior to RT-delivery, in order to account for any changes in anatomy and target position.

METHODS

Patients previously treated with palliative RT for bone metastases were selected from our hospital database. Patient dCT-images were deformed to treatment CBCTs in the Ethos platform (Varian Medical Systems) and a synthetic CT (sCT) generated. Treatment quality was analyzed by comparing a coverage of the V95% of the planning/clinical target volume and different organ-at-risk (OAR) doses between adapted and initial clinical treatment plans. Doses were recalculated on the CBCT and sCT in a separate treatment planning system. Adapted plan doses were measured on-couch using an anthropomorphic phantom with a Gafchromic EBT3 dosimetric film and compared to dose calculations.

RESULTS

All adapted treatment plans met the clinical goals for target and OARs and outperformed the original treatment plans calculated on the (daily) sCT. Differences in V95% of the target volume coverage between the initial and adapted treatments were <0.2%. Dose recalculations on CBCT and sCT were comparable, and the average gamma pass rate (3%/2 mm) of dosimetric measurements was 98.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Online daily adaptive RT using dCTs instead of a dedicated pCT is feasible using the Ethos platform. This workflow has now been implemented clinically.

Bone Metastases and Health in Prostate Cancer: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Implications

Clinically relevant bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for prostate cancer patients. Distinct phenotypes are described: osteoblastic, the more common osteolytic and mixed. A molecular classification has been also proposed. Bone metastases start with the tropism of cancer cells to the bone through different multi-step tumor-host interactions, as described by the "metastatic cascade" model. Understanding these mechanisms, although far from being fully elucidated, could offer several potential targets for prevention and therapy. Moreover, the prognosis of patients is markedly influenced by skeletal-related events. They can be correlated not only with bone metastases, but also with "bad" bone health. There is a close correlation between osteoporosis-a skeletal disorder with decreased bone mass and qualitative alterations-and prostate cancer, in particular when treated with androgen deprivation therapy, a milestone in its treatment. Systemic treatments for prostate cancer, especially with the newest options, have improved the survival and quality of life of patients with respect to skeletal-related events; however, all patients should be evaluated for "bone health" and osteoporotic risk, both in the presence and in the absence of bone metastases. Treatment with bone-targeted therapies should be evaluated even in the absence of bone metastases, as described in special guidelines and according to a multidisciplinary evaluation.

Same-day adaptive palliative radiotherapy without prior CT simulation: Early outcomes in the FAST-METS study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Standard palliative radiotherapy workflows involve waiting times or multiple clinic visits. We developed and implemented a rapid palliative workflow using diagnostic imaging (dCT) for pre-planning, with subsequent on-couch target and plan adaptation based on a synthetic computed tomography (CT) obtained from cone-beam CT imaging (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with painful bone metastases and recent diagnostic imaging were eligible for inclusion in this prospective, ethics-approved study. The workflow consisted of 1) telephone consultation with a radiation oncologist (RO); 2) pre-planning on the dCT using planning templates and mostly intensity-modulated radiotherapy; 3) RO consultation on the day of treatment; 4) CBCT scan with on-couch adaptation of the target and treatment plan; 5) delivery of either scheduled or adapted treatment plan. Primary outcomes were dosimetric data and treatment times; secondary outcome was patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

47 patients were enrolled between December 2021 and October 2022. In all treatments, adapted treatment plans were chosen due to significant improvements in target coverage (PTV/CTV V95%, p-value < 0.005) compared to the original treatment plan calculated on daily anatomy. Most patients were satisfied with the workflow. The average treatment time, including consultation and on-couch adaptive treatment, was 85 minutes. On-couch adaptation took on average 30 min. but was longer in cases where the automated deformable image registration failed to correctly propagate the targets.

CONCLUSION

A fast treatment workflow for patients referred for painful bone metastases was implemented successfully using online adaptive radiotherapy, without a dedicated CT simulation. Patients were generally satisfied with the palliative radiotherapy workflow.