1
|
Toussaint L, Matysiak W, Alapetite C, Aristu J, Bannink-Gawryszuk A, Bolle S, Bolsi A, Calvo F, Cerron Campoo F, Charlwood F, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Doyen J, Drosik-Rutowicz K, Dutheil P, Embring A, Engellau J, Goedgebeur A, Goudjil F, Harrabi S, Kopec R, Kristensen I, Lægsdmand P, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Meijers A, Mirandola A, Missohou F, Montero Feijoo M, Muren LP, Ondrova B, Orlandi E, Pettersson E, Pica A, Plaude S, Righetto R, Rombi B, Timmermann B, Van Beek K, Vela A, Vennarini S, Vestergaard A, Vidal M, Vondracek V, Weber DC, Whitfield G, Zimmerman J, Maduro JH, Lassen-Ramshad Y. Clinical practice in European centres treating paediatric posterior fossa tumours with pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 198:110414. [PMID: 38942120 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE As no guidelines for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy (PT) of paediatric posterior fossa (PF) tumours exist to date, this study investigated planning techniques across European PT centres, with special considerations for brainstem and spinal cord sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS A survey and a treatment planning comparison were initiated across nineteen European PBS-PT centres treating paediatric patients. The survey assessed all aspects of the treatment chain, including but not limited to delineations, dose constraints and treatment planning. Each centre planned two PF tumour cases for focal irradiation, according to their own clinical practice but based on common delineations. The prescription dose was 54 Gy(RBE) for Case 1 and 59.4 Gy(RBE) for Case 2. For both cases, planning strategies and relevant dose metrics were compared. RESULTS Seventeen (89 %) centres answered the survey, and sixteen (80 %) participated in the treatment planning comparison. In the survey, thirteen (68 %) centres reported using the European Particle Therapy Network definition for brainstem delineation. In the treatment planning study, while most centres used three beam directions, their configurations varied widely across centres. Large variations were also seen in brainstem doses, with a brainstem near maximum dose (D2%) ranging from 52.7 Gy(RBE) to 55.7 Gy(RBE) (Case 1), and from 56.8 Gy(RBE) to 60.9 Gy(RBE) (Case 2). CONCLUSION This study assessed the European PBS-PT planning of paediatric PF tumours. Agreement was achieved in e.g. delineation-practice, while wider variations were observed in planning approach and consequently dose to organs at risk. Collaboration between centres is still ongoing, striving towards common guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Toussaint
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Witold Matysiak
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Claire Alapetite
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton Centre, Paris, France
| | - Javier Aristu
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Proton Therapy Unit, Madrid, Spain
| | - Agata Bannink-Gawryszuk
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Bolle
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton Centre, Paris, France; Institut Gustave Roussy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Villejuif, France; Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Centre for Proton Therapy, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Felipe Calvo
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Proton Therapy Unit, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Frances Charlwood
- University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France; Angers University Hospital, Department of Paediatric Oncology, Angers, France
| | - Jérôme Doyen
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nice, France
| | - Katarzyna Drosik-Rutowicz
- National Research Institute of Oncology Kraków/Gliwice branch, Department of Radiation Oncology, Kraków, Poland
| | - Pauline Dutheil
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France
| | - Anna Embring
- Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jacob Engellau
- Skåne University Hospital, Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anneleen Goedgebeur
- PARTICLE Proton Therapy Centre University Hospital Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton Centre, Paris, France
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Centre, University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Renata Kopec
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
| | - Ingrid Kristensen
- Skåne University Hospital, Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Peter Lægsdmand
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | | | - Arturs Meijers
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Centre for Proton Therapy, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Centre for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Fernand Missohou
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France
| | | | - Ludvig P Muren
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Barbora Ondrova
- Proton Therapy Centre Czech, Department of Radiation Oncology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Centre for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy; University of Pavia, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, Pavia, Italy
| | - Erik Pettersson
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Alessia Pica
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Centre for Proton Therapy, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Sandija Plaude
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Barbara Rombi
- Trento Proton Therapy Centre,epartment of Radiation Oncology, APSS Trento, Italy
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany; Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| | - Karen Van Beek
- PARTICLE Proton Therapy Centre University Hospital Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anthony Vela
- Centre Regional Francois Baclesse, Department of Radiation Oncology, Caen, France
| | - Sabina Vennarini
- Paediatric Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Foundation Institute of Cancer, Milano, Italy
| | - Anne Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Marie Vidal
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nice, France
| | - Vladimir Vondracek
- Proton Therapy Centre Czech, Department of Radiation Oncology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Damien C Weber
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Centre for Proton Therapy, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Gillian Whitfield
- University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; University of Manchester, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, The Children's Brain Tumour Research Network, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Zimmerman
- Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - John H Maduro
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsang DS, Timmerman B. Improving Access to Proton Therapy in the United States and Around the World. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:1078-1081. [PMID: 38925766 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Beate Timmerman
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dalmasso C, Alapetite C, Bolle S, Goudjil F, Lusque A, Desrousseaux J, Claude L, Doyen J, Bernier-Chastagner V, Ducassou A, Sevely A, Roques M, Tensaouti F, Laprie A. Brainstem toxicity after proton or photon therapy in children and young adults with localized intracranial ependymoma: A French retrospective study. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110157. [PMID: 38367939 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Ependymoma is the third most frequent childhood braintumor. Standard treatment is surgery followed by radiation therapy including proton therapy (PBT). Retrospective studies have reported higher rates of brainstem injury after PBT than after photon therapy (XRT). We report a national multicenter study of the incidence of brainstem injury after XRT versus PBT, and their correlations with dosimetric data. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included all patients aged < 25 years who were treated with PBT or XRT for intracranial ependymoma at five French pediatric oncology reference centers between 2007 and 2020. We reviewed pre-irradiation MRI, follow-up MRIs over the 12 months post-treatment and clinical data. RESULTS Of the 83 patients, 42 were treated with PBT, 37 with XRT, and 4 with both (median dose: 59.4 Gy, range: 53‑60). No new or progressive symptomatic brainstem injury was found. Four patients presented asymptomatic radiographic changes (punctiform brainstem enhancement and FLAIR hypersignal), with median onset at 3.5 months (range: 3.0‑9.4) after radiation therapy, and median offset at 7.6 months (range: 3.7‑7.9). Two had been treated with PBT, one with XRT, and one with mixed XRT-PBT. Prescribed doses were 59.4, 55.8, 59.4 and 54 Gy. CONCLUSION Asymptomatic radiographic changes occurred in 4.8% of patients with ependymoma in a large national series. There was no correlation with dose or technique. No symptomatic brainstem injury was identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Dalmasso
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse- Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Claire Alapetite
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie - Centre de Protontherapie d', Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Institut Curie - Centre de Protontherapie d', Orsay, Orsay, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Institut Curie - Centre de Protontherapie d', Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Amélie Lusque
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse- Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Jacques Desrousseaux
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse- Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Line Claude
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Jérome Doyen
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | - Anne Ducassou
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse- Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Annick Sevely
- Department of Radiology, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Margaux Roques
- Department of Radiology, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Fatima Tensaouti
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse- Oncopole, Toulouse, France; ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, INSERM, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse- Oncopole, Toulouse, France; ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, INSERM, UPS, Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Voshart DC, Klaver M, Jiang Y, van Weering HRJ, van Buuren-Broek F, van der Linden GP, Cinat D, Kiewiet HH, Malimban J, Vazquez-Matias DA, Reali Nazario L, Scholma AC, Sewdihal J, van Goethem MJ, van Luijk P, Coppes RP, Barazzuol L. Proton therapy induces a local microglial neuroimmune response. Radiother Oncol 2024; 193:110117. [PMID: 38453539 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Although proton therapy is increasingly being used in the treatment of paediatric and adult brain tumours, there are still uncertainties surrounding the biological effect of protons on the normal brain. Microglia, the brain-resident macrophages, have been shown to play a role in the development of radiation-induced neurotoxicity. However, their molecular and hence functional response to proton irradiation remains unknown. This study investigates the effect of protons on microglia by comparing the effect of photons and protons as well as the influence of age and different irradiated volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Rats were irradiated with 14 Gy to the whole brain with photons (X-rays), plateau protons, spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) protons or to 50 % anterior, or 50 % posterior brain sub-volumes with plateau protons. RNA sequencing, validation of microglial priming gene expression using qPCR and high-content imaging analysis of microglial morphology were performed in the cortex at 12 weeks post irradiation. RESULTS Photons and plateau protons induced a shared transcriptomic response associated with neuroinflammation. This response was associated with a similar microglial priming gene expression signature and distribution of microglial morphologies. Expression of the priming gene signature was less pronounced in juvenile rats compared to adults and slightly increased in rats irradiated with SOBP protons. High-precision partial brain irradiation with protons induced a local microglial priming response and morphological changes. CONCLUSION Overall, our data indicate that the brain responds in a similar manner to photons and plateau protons with a shared local upregulation of microglial priming-associated genes, potentially enhancing the immune response to subsequent inflammatory challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniëlle C Voshart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Myrthe Klaver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Yuting Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Hilmar R J van Weering
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Neurobiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Fleur van Buuren-Broek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Gideon P van der Linden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Davide Cinat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Harry H Kiewiet
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, PARTREC, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9747 AA, The Netherlands
| | - Justin Malimban
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel A Vazquez-Matias
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Luiza Reali Nazario
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Ayla C Scholma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Sewdihal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Marc-Jan van Goethem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, PARTREC, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9747 AA, The Netherlands
| | - Peter van Luijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Rob P Coppes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Lara Barazzuol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 AD, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Janssens GO, Timmermann B, Laprie A, Mandeville H, Padovani L, Chargari C, Kearns P, Kozhaeva O, Kameric L, Kienesberger A, van Rossum PSN, Boterberg T, Lievens Y, Vassal G. The organization of care in pediatric radiotherapy across SIOP Europe affiliated centers: A multicenter survey in the framework of the 'Joint Action on Rare Cancers' project. Radiother Oncol 2024; 191:110075. [PMID: 38159681 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE To reduce inequalities among SIOPE-affiliated countries, standard and optional levels to deliver 'Good Clinical Practice' compliant treatment in pediatric radiation oncology have been published. The aim of this project was to map the availability of pediatric radiotherapy resources across SIOPE-affiliated radiotherapy departments. MATERIALS/METHODS An online survey with 34 questions was distributed to 246 radiotherapy departments across 35 SIOPE-affiliated countries. In addition to demographic data, 15 general items related to the organization of the radiotherapy process, and 10 radiotherapy-specific items were defined. For each of the 25 items, sum scores were calculated per center and country. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze associations. RESULTS Between March-June 2019, 121 departments (49 %) out of 31 countries (89 %) completed the survey. At center level, involvement of core disciplines in tumor boards (28 %), and integration of dedicated pediatric radiation therapy technologists (24 %) are limited, while rare & complex brachytherapy procedures are performed in many centers (23 %). For general and radiotherapy-specific items respectively, a relevant variation of sum scores was observed across countries (Δgeneral: ≤10 points; ΔRT_specific: ≤5 points) and among centers within a country (Δgeneral: ≤9 points; ΔRT_specific: ≤6 points). Sum scores for general and radiotherapy-specific items were higher in countries with a high-income (p < 0.01) and higher health development index (p < 0.01). A larger annual number of irradiated pediatric patients was associated with higher sum scores for general items (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION This survey demonstrates the disparities in organization of pediatric radiotherapy departments between SIOPE-affiliated countries and centers within the same country. Investment is needed to reduce inequalities in pediatric radiotherapy care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert O Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncopole Claudius Regaud at Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Henry Mandeville
- The Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Laetitia Padovani
- Aix-Marseille University, Oncology-Radiotherapy-Department, CRCM Inserm UMR1068, CNRSUMR7258 AMUUM105, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Pamela Kearns
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Olga Kozhaeva
- Policy Department, European Society for Pediatric Oncology, SIOP Europe, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Leila Kameric
- Childhood Cancer International - Europe, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Tom Boterberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven (PARTICLE), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gilles Vassal
- Department of Children and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berrington de González A, Gibson TM, Lee C, Albert PS, Griffin KT, Kitahara CM, Liu D, Mille MM, Shin J, Bajaj BV, Flood TE, Gallotto SL, Paganetti H, Ahmed SK, Eaton BR, Indelicato DJ, Milgrom SA, Palmer JD, Baliga S, Poppe MM, Tsang DS, Wong K, Yock TI. The Pediatric Proton and Photon Therapy Comparison Cohort: Study Design for a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort to Investigate Subsequent Cancers After Pediatric Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101273. [PMID: 38047226 PMCID: PMC10692298 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The physical properties of protons lower doses to surrounding normal tissues compared with photons, potentially reducing acute and long-term adverse effects, including subsequent cancers. The magnitude of benefit is uncertain, however, and currently based largely on modeling studies. Despite the paucity of directly comparative data, the number of proton centers and patients are expanding exponentially. Direct studies of the potential risks and benefits are needed in children, who have the highest risk of radiation-related subsequent cancers. The Pediatric Proton and Photon Therapy Comparison Cohort aims to meet this need. Methods and Materials We are developing a record-linkage cohort of 10,000 proton and 10,000 photon therapy patients treated from 2007 to 2022 in the United States and Canada for pediatric central nervous system tumors, sarcomas, Hodgkin lymphoma, or neuroblastoma, the pediatric tumors most frequently treated with protons. Exposure assessment will be based on state-of-the-art dosimetry facilitated by collection of electronic radiation records for all eligible patients. Subsequent cancers and mortality will be ascertained by linkage to state and provincial cancer registries in the United States and Canada, respectively. The primary analysis will examine subsequent cancer risk after proton therapy compared with photon therapy, adjusting for potential confounders and accounting for competing risks. Results For the primary aim comparing overall subsequent cancer rates between proton and photon therapy, we estimated that with 10,000 patients in each treatment group there would be 80% power to detect a relative risk of 0.8 assuming a cumulative incidence of subsequent cancers of 2.5% by 15 years after diagnosis. To date, 9 institutions have joined the cohort and initiated data collection; additional centers will be added in the coming year(s). Conclusions Our findings will affect clinical practice for pediatric patients with cancer by providing the first large-scale systematic comparison of the risk of subsequent cancers from proton compared with photon therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Todd M. Gibson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Paul S. Albert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Keith T. Griffin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Cari Meinhold Kitahara
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Danping Liu
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthew M. Mille
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jungwook Shin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Benjamin V.M. Bajaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tristin E. Flood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara L. Gallotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Safia K. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bree R. Eaton
- Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Daniel J. Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Sarah A. Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Matthew M. Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah–Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Derek S. Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth Wong
- Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Torunn I. Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vennarini S, Colombo F, Mirandola A, Chiaravalli S, Orlandi E, Massimino M, Casanova M, Ferrari A. Clinical Insight on Proton Therapy for Paediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Manag Res 2023; 15:1125-1139. [PMID: 37842128 PMCID: PMC10576457 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s362664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper offers an insight into the use of Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) in paediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the literature, investigating comparative photon-proton dosimetry, outcome, and toxicity. In the complex and multimodal scenario of the treatment of RMS, clear evidence of the therapeutic superiority of PBT compared to other modern photon techniques has not yet been demonstrated; however, PBT can be considered an excellent treatment option, in particular for young children and patients with specific primary sites, such as the head and neck area (and especially the parameningeal regions), genito-urinary, pelvic, and paravertebral regions. The unique depth-dose characteristics of protons can be exploited to achieve significant reductions in normal tissue doses and may allow an escalation of tumour doses and greater sparing of normal tissues, thus potentially improving local control while at the same time reducing toxicity and improving quality of life. However, access of children with RMS (and more in general with solid tumors) to PBT remains a challenge, due to the limited number of available proton therapy installations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Vennarini
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Colombo
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefano Chiaravalli
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Maura Massimino
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Michela Casanova
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu KX, Haas-Kogan DA, Elhalawani H. Radiotherapy for Primary Pediatric Central Nervous System Malignancies: Current Treatment Paradigms and Future Directions. Pediatr Neurosurg 2023; 58:356-366. [PMID: 37703864 DOI: 10.1159/000533777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central nervous system tumors are the most common solid tumors in childhood. Treatment paradigms for pediatric central nervous system malignancies depend on elements including tumor histology, age of patient, and stage of disease. Radiotherapy is an important modality of treatment for many pediatric central nervous system malignancies. SUMMARY While radiation contributes to excellent overall survival rates for many patients, radiation also carries significant risks of long-term side effects including neurocognitive decline, hearing loss, growth impairment, neuroendocrine dysfunction, strokes, and secondary malignancies. In recent decades, clinical trials have demonstrated that with better imaging and staging along with more sophisticated radiation planning and treatment set-up verification, smaller treatment volumes can be utilized without decrement in survival. Furthermore, the development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton-beam radiotherapy has greatly improved conformality of radiation. KEY MESSAGES Recent changes in radiation treatment paradigms have decreased risks of short- and long-term toxicity for common histologies and in different age groups. Future studies will continue to develop novel radiation regimens to improve outcomes in aggressive central nervous system tumors, integrate molecular subtypes to tailor radiation treatment, and decrease radiation-associated toxicity for long-term survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin X Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vázquez M, Bachmann N, Pica A, Bolsi A, De Angelis C, Lomax AJ, Weber DC. Early outcome after craniospinal irradiation with pencil beam scanning proton therapy for children, adolescents and young adults with brain tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30087. [PMID: 36377685 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most common solid malignancies in children and adolescents and young adults (C-AYAs). Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is an essential treatment component for some malignancies, but it can also lead to important toxicity. Pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) allows for a minimization of dose delivered to organs at risk and, thus, potentially reduced acute and late toxicity. This study aims to report the clinical outcomes and toxicity rates after CSI for C-AYAs treated with PBSPT. Seventy-one C-AYAs (median age: 7.4 years) with CNS tumors were treated with CSI between 2004 and 2021. Medulloblastoma (n = 42: 59%) and ependymoma (n = 8; 11%) were the most common histologies. Median prescribed total PBSPT dose was 54 GyRBE (range: 18-60.4), and median prescribed craniospinal dose was 24 GyRBE (range: 18-36.8). Acute and late toxicities were coded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. After a median follow-up of 24.5 months, the estimated 2-year local control, distant control, and overall survival were 86.3%, 80.5%, and 84.7%, respectively. Late grade ≥3 toxicity-free rate was 92.6% at 2 years. Recurrent and metastatic tumors were associated with worse outcome. In conclusion, excellent tumor control with low toxicity rates was observed in C-AYAs with brain tumors treated with CSI using PBSPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Vázquez
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Bachmann
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Claudio De Angelis
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Qiu W, Zhang W, Ma X, Kong Y, Shi P, Fu M, Wang D, Hu M, Zhou X, Dong Q, Zhou Q, Zhu J. Auto-segmentation of important centers of growth in the pediatric skeleton to consider during radiation therapy based on deep learning. Med Phys 2023; 50:284-296. [PMID: 36047281 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routinely delineating of important skeletal growth centers is imperative to mitigate radiation-induced growth abnormalities for pediatric cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. However, it is hindered by several practical problems, including difficult identification, time consumption, and inter-practitioner variability. PURPOSE The goal of this study was to construct and evaluate a novel Triplet-Attention U-Net (TAU-Net)-based auto-segmentation model for important skeletal growth centers in childhood cancer radiotherapy, concentrating on the accuracy and time efficiency. METHODS A total of 107 childhood cancer patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria were enrolled in the training cohort (N = 80) and test cohort (N = 27). The craniofacial growth plates, shoulder growth centers, and pelvic ossification centers, with a total of 19 structures in the three groups, were manually delineated by two experienced radiation oncologists on axial, coronal, and sagittal computed tomography images. Modified from U-Net, the proposed TAU-Net has one main branch and two bypass branches, receiving semantic information of three adjacent slices to predict the target structure. With supervised deep learning, the skeletal growth centers contouring of each group was generated by three different auto-segmentation models: U-Net, V-Net, and the proposed TAU-Net. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance 95% (HD95) were used to evaluate the accuracy of three auto-segmentation models. The time spent on performing manual tasks and manually correcting auto-contouring generated by TAU-Net was recorded. The paired t-test was used to compare the statistical differences in delineation quality and time efficiency. RESULTS Among the three groups, including craniofacial growth plates, shoulder growth centers, and pelvic ossification centers groups, TAU-Net had demonstrated highly acceptable performance (the average DSC = 0.77, 0.87, and 0.83 for each group; the average HD95 = 2.28, 2.07, and 2.86 mm for each group). In the overall evaluation of 19 regions of interest (ROIs) in the test cohort, TAU-Net had an overwhelming advantage over U-Net (63.2% ROIs in DSC and 31.6% ROIs in HD95, p = 0.001-0.042) and V-Net (94.7% ROIs in DSC and 36.8% ROIs in HD95, p = 0.001-0.040). With an average time of 52.2 min for manual delineation, the average time saved to adjust TAU-Net-generated contours was 37.6 min (p < 0.001), a 72% reduction. CONCLUSIONS Deep learning-based models have presented enormous potential for the auto-segmentation of important growth centers in pediatric skeleton, where the proposed TAU-Net outperformed the U-Net and V-Net in geometrical precision for the majority status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenlong Qiu
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Manteia Technologies Co., Ltd, Xiamen, P. R. China
| | - Xingmin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Youyong Kong
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, P. R. China
| | - Pengyue Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Min Fu
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Dandan Wang
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Man Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| | - Xianjun Zhou
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, P. R. China
| | - Qian Dong
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, P. R. China
| | - Qichao Zhou
- Manteia Technologies Co., Ltd, Xiamen, P. R. China
| | - Jian Zhu
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Changes in Nutritional Status of Cancer Patients Undergoing Proton Radiation Therapy Based on Real-World Data. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING 2023; 2023:9260747. [PMID: 36824406 PMCID: PMC9943601 DOI: 10.1155/2023/9260747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Methods Observational study on 47 adult hospitalized cancer patients including 27 males and 20 females who received proton beam radiotherapy during December 2021 and August 2022. Nutritional assessments, 24 h dietary survey, handgrip strength (HGS) test, anthropometrical measurements, and hematological parameters were conducted or collected at the beginning and the completion of treatment. Results The rate of nutritional risk and malnutrition among the total of 47 enrolled patients was 4.3% and 12.8% at the onset of proton radiation and raised up to 6.4% and 27.7% at the end of the treatment. 42.6% of patients experienced weight loss during the proton radiotherapy, and 1 of them had weight loss over 5%, and in general, the average body weight was stable over radiotherapy. The changes in patients' 24 h dietary intakes, HGS, and anthropometrical parameters, including triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), midupper arm circumference (MUAC), and midupper arm muscle circumference (MAMC), were statistically insignificant over the treatment (all p values > 0.05). The changes in patients' hematological parameters, including total protein (TP) and serum albumin (ALB), were not statistically significant over the treatment (all p values >0.05), and the level of hemoglobin (HGB) at the end of treatment was higher than that at the onset (p < 0.05). Conclusion The results of this study demonstrated that proton radiotherapy might have a lighter effect on the nutritional status of cancer patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Griffin KT, Yeom YS, Mille MM, Lee C, Jung JW, Hertel NE, Lee C. Comparison of out-of-field normal tissue dose estimates for pencil beam scanning proton therapy: MCNP6, PHITS, and TOPAS. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022; 9:10.1088/2057-1976/acaab1. [PMID: 36562506 PMCID: PMC10772933 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/acaab1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Monte Carlo (MC) methods are considered the gold-standard approach to dose estimation for normal tissues outside the treatment field (out-of-field) in proton therapy. However, the physics of secondary particle production from high-energy protons are uncertain, particularly for secondary neutrons, due to challenges in performing accurate measurements. Instead, various physics models have been developed over the years to reenact these high-energy interactions based on theory. It should thus be acknowledged that MC users must currently accept some unknown uncertainties in out-of-field dose estimates. In the present study, we compared three MC codes (MCNP6, PHITS, and TOPAS) and their available physics models to investigate the variation in out-of-field normal tissue dosimetry for pencil beam scanning proton therapy patients. Total yield and double-differential (energy and angle) production of two major secondary particles, neutrons and gammas, were determined through irradiation of a water phantom at six proton energies (80, 90, 100, 110, 150, and 200 MeV). Out-of-field normal tissue doses were estimated for intracranial irradiations of 1-, 5-, and 15-year-old patients using whole-body computational phantoms. Notably, the total dose estimates for each out-of-field organ varied by approximately 25% across the three codes, independent of its distance from the treatment volume. Dose discrepancies amongst the codes were linked to the utilized physics model, which impacts the characteristics of the secondary radiation field. Using developer-recommended physics, TOPAS produced both the highest neutron and gamma doses to all out-of-field organs from all examined conditions; this was linked to its highest yields of secondary particles and second hardest energy spectra. Subsequent results when using other physics models found reduced yields and energies, resulting in lower dose estimates. Neutron dose estimates were the most impacted by physics model choice, and thus the variation in out-of-field dose estimates may be even larger than 25% when considering biological effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith T. Griffin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Yeon Soo Yeom
- Department of Radiation Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea
| | - Matthew M. Mille
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Choonik Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jae Won Jung
- Department of Physics, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Nolan E. Hertel
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ruggi A, Melchionda F, Sardi I, Pavone R, Meneghello L, Kitanovski L, Zaletel LZ, Farace P, Zucchelli M, Scagnet M, Toni F, Righetto R, Cianchetti M, Prete A, Greto D, Cammelli S, Morganti AG, Rombi B. Toxicity and Clinical Results after Proton Therapy for Pediatric Medulloblastoma: A Multi-Centric Retrospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2747. [PMID: 35681727 PMCID: PMC9179586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. Even if current treatment dramatically improves the prognosis, survivors often develop long-term treatment-related sequelae. The current radiotherapy standard for medulloblastoma is craniospinal irradiation with a boost to the primary tumor site and to any metastatic sites. Proton therapy (PT) has similar efficacy compared to traditional photon-based radiotherapy but might achieve lower toxicity rates. We report on our multi-centric experience with 43 children with medulloblastoma (median age at diagnosis 8.7 years, IQR 6.6, M/F 23/20; 26 high-risk, 14 standard-risk, 3 ex-infant), who received active scanning PT between 2015 and 2021, with a focus on PT-related acute-subacute toxicity, as well as some preliminary data on late toxicity. Most acute toxicities were mild and manageable with supportive therapy. Hematological toxicity was limited, even among HR patients who underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation before PT. Preliminary data on late sequelae were also encouraging, although a longer follow-up is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Ruggi
- Specialty School of Paediatrics-Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Fraia Melchionda
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, IRCCS Sant’Orsola SSD, University Hospital of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.M.); (A.P.)
| | - Iacopo Sardi
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; (I.S.); (R.P.)
| | - Rossana Pavone
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; (I.S.); (R.P.)
| | - Linda Meneghello
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology Service, Pediatric Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, 38123 Trento, Italy;
| | - Lidija Kitanovski
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | | | - Paolo Farace
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Mino Zucchelli
- Pediatric Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurological Science, IRCCS Bellaria Hospital, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Mirko Scagnet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy;
| | - Francesco Toni
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Roberto Righetto
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Marco Cianchetti
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Arcangelo Prete
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, IRCCS Sant’Orsola SSD, University Hospital of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.M.); (A.P.)
| | - Daniela Greto
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (A.G.M.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (S.C.); (A.G.M.)
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Barbara Rombi
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (P.F.); (R.R.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Romero-Expósito M, Toma-Dasu I, Dasu A. Determining Out-of-Field Doses and Second Cancer Risk From Proton Therapy in Young Patients—An Overview. Front Oncol 2022; 12:892078. [PMID: 35712488 PMCID: PMC9197425 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.892078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy has the potential to provide survival and tumor control outcomes comparable and frequently superior to photon therapy. This has led to a significant concern in the medical physics community on the risk for the induction of second cancers in all patients and especially in younger patients, as they are considered more radiosensitive than adults and have an even longer expected lifetime after treatment. Thus, our purpose is to present an overview of the research carried out on the evaluation of out-of-field doses linked to second cancer induction and the prediction of this risk. Most investigations consisted of Monte Carlo simulations in passive beam facilities for clinical scenarios. These works established that equivalent doses in organs could be up to 200 mSv or 900 mSv for a brain or a craniospinal treatment, respectively. The major contribution to this dose comes from the secondary neutrons produced in the beam line elements. Few works focused on scanned-beam facilities, but available data show that, for these facilities, equivalent doses could be between 2 and 50 times lower. Patient age is a relevant factor in the dose level, especially for younger patients (by means of the size of the body) and, in addition, in the predicted risk by models (due to the age dependence of the radiosensitivity). For risks, the sex of the patient also plays an important role, as female patients show higher sensitivity to radiation. Thus, predicted risks of craniospinal irradiation can range from 8% for a 15-year-old male patient to 58% for a 2-year-old female patient, using a risk model from a radiological protection field. These values must be taken with caution due to uncertainties in risk models, and then dosimetric evaluation of stray radiation becomes mandatory in order to complement epidemiological studies and be able to model appropriate dose–response functions for this dose range. In this sense, analytical models represent a useful tool and some models have been implemented to be used for young patients. Research carried out so far confirmed that proton beam therapy reduces the out-of-field doses and second cancer risk. However, further investigations may be required in scanned-beam delivery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maite Romero-Expósito
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Oncology Pathology Department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Maite Romero-Expósito,
| | - Iuliana Toma-Dasu
- Oncology Pathology Department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baliga S, Gallotto S, Bajaj B, Lewy J, Weyman E, Lawell M, Yeap BY, Ebb DE, Huang M, Caruso P, Perry A, Jones RM, MacDonald SM, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI. Decade Long Disease, Secondary Malignancy, and Brainstem Injury Outcomes in Pediatric and Young Adult Medulloblastoma Patients Treated with Proton Radiotherapy. Neuro Oncol 2021; 24:1010-1019. [PMID: 34788463 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma experience long term morbidity associated with the toxic effects of post-operative radiotherapy. Proton radiotherapy limits radiation dose to normal tissues thereby reducing side effects of treatment while maintaining high cure rates. However, long term data on disease outcomes and long-term effects of proton radiotherapy remain limited. METHODS 178 Pediatric medulloblastoma patients treated with proton radiotherapy between 2002-2016 at the Massachusetts General Hospital comprise the cohort of patients who were treated with surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. We evaluated EFS, OS, and LC using the Kaplan Meier method. The cumulative incidence of brainstem injury and secondary malignancies was assessed. RESULTS Median follow-up was 9.3 years. 159 patients (89.3%) underwent a gross total resection (GTR). The 10-year OS for the entire cohort, standard risk, and intermediate/high risk patients was 79.3%, 86.9%, and 68.9% respectively. The 10-year EFS for entire cohort, SR, and IR/HR cohorts was 73.8%, 79.5%, and 66.2%. The 10-year EFS and OS for patients with GTR/NTR were 75.3% and 81.0% versus 57.7% and 61.0% for STR. On univariate analysis, IR/HR status was associated with inferior EFS, while both anaplastic histology and IR/HR status was associated with worse overall survival. The 10-year cumulative incidence of secondary tumors and brainstem injury was 5.6% and 2.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort study of pediatric medulloblastoma, proton radiotherapy was effective and disease outcomes were comparable to historically treated photon cohorts. The incidence of secondary malignancies and brainstem injury was low in this cohort with mature follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Sara Gallotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Benjamin Bajaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jaqueline Lewy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth Weyman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Miranda Lawell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beow Y Yeap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David E Ebb
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary Huang
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul Caruso
- Department of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alisa Perry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robin M Jones
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Toussaint L, Peters S, Mikkelsen R, Karabegovic S, Bäumer C, Muren LP, Tram-Henriksen L, Høyer M, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Timmermann B. Delineation atlas of the Circle of Willis and the large intracranial arteries for evaluation of doses to neurovascular structures in pediatric brain tumor patients treated with radiation therapy. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1392-1398. [PMID: 34213401 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1945679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of pediatric brain tumors are susceptible to neurovascular disease after radiotherapy, with dose to the chiasm or Circle of Willis (CW) as risk factors. The aims of this study were to develop a delineation atlas of neurovascular structures, to investigate the doses to these structures in relation to tumor location and to investigate potential dose surrogates for the CW dose. MATERIAL AND METHODS An atlas of the CW, the large intracranial arteries and the suprasellar cistern (SC) was developed and validated. Thirty proton plans from previously treated pediatric brain tumor patients were retrieved and grouped according to tumor site: 10 central, 10 lateralized, and 10 posterior fossa tumors. Based on the atlas, neurovascular structures were delineated and dose metrics (mean dose (Dmean) and maximal dose (Dmax)) to these structures and the already delineated chiasm were evaluated. The agreement between dose metrics to the CW vs. chiasm/SC was investigated. The minimal Hausdorff distance (HDmin) between the target and SC was correlated with the SC Dmean. RESULTS The median Dmean/Dmax to the CW were 53 Gy(RBE)/55 Gy(RBE) in the central tumors, 18 Gy(RBE)/25 Gy(RBE) in the lateralized tumors and 30 Gy(RBE)/49 Gy(RBE) in the posterior fossa tumors. There was a good agreement between the Dmax/Dmean to the CW and the SC for all cases (R2=0.99), while in the posterior fossa group, the CW Dmax was underestimated when using the chiasm as surrogate (R2=0.76). Across all patients, cases with HDmin < 10 mm between the target and the SC received the highest SC Dmean. CONCLUSION The pattern of dose to neurovascular structures varied with the tumor location. For all locations, SC doses could be used as a surrogate for CW doses. A minimal distance larger than 10 mm between the target and the SC indicated a potential for neurovascular dose sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Toussaint
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Peters
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - R. Mikkelsen
- Department of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Karabegovic
- Department of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - C. Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)
| | - L. P. Muren
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - L. Tram-Henriksen
- Department of Pediatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M. Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Y. Lassen-Ramshad
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - B. Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Germany
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Background: Gliomas are primary cerebral tumors. Radiation therapy plays a key role in their treatment but with a risk of toxicity associated with the dose to and volume of normal tissue that is irradiated. With its precision properties allowing for the increased sparing of healthy tissue, proton therapy could be an interesting option for this pathology. Methods: Two reviewers performed a systematic review of original papers published between 2010 and July 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. We analyzed disease outcomes, toxicity outcomes, or dosimetry data in four separate groups: children/adults and individuals with low-/high-grade gliomas. Results: Among 15 studies, 11 concerned clinical and toxicity outcomes, and 4 reported dosimetry data. Proton therapy showed similar disease outcomes with greater tolerance than conventional radiation therapy, partly due to the better dosimetry plans. Conclusions: This review suggests that proton therapy is a promising technique for glioma treatment. However, studies with a high level of evidence are still needed to validate this finding.
Collapse
|
18
|
Young Adult Populations Face Yet Another Barrier to Care With Insurers: Limited Access to Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1496-1504. [PMID: 33677051 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Young patients, including pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (YA) patients, are most likely to benefit from the reduced integral dose of proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) resulting in fewer late toxicities and secondary malignancies. This study sought to examine insurance approval and appeal outcomes for PBT among YA patients compared with pediatric patients at a large-volume proton therapy center. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a cross-sectional cohort study of 284 consecutive patients aged 0 to 39 years for whom PBT was recommended in 2018 through 2019. Pediatric patients were defined as aged 0 to 18 years and YA patients 19 to 39 years. Rates of approval, denials, and decision timelines were calculated. Tumor type and location were also evaluated as factors that may influence insurance decisions. RESULTS A total of 207 patients (73%) were approved for PBT at initial request. YA patients (n = 68/143, 48%) were significantly less likely to receive initial approval compared with pediatric patients (n = 139/141; 99%) (P < .001). Even after 47% (n = 35 of 75) of the PBT denials for YA patients were overturned, YAs had a significantly lower final PBT approval (72% vs pediatric 99%; P < .001). The median wait time was also significantly longer for YA patients (median, 8 days; interquartile range [IQR] 3-17 vs median, 2 days; IQR, 0-6; P < .001). In those patients requiring an appeal, the median wait time was 16 days (IQR, 9-25). CONCLUSION Given the decades of survivorship of YA patients, PBT is an important tool to reduce late toxicities and secondary malignancies. Compared with pediatric patients, YA patients are significantly less likely to receive insurance approval for PBT. Insurance denials and subsequent appeal requests result in significant delays for YA patients. Insurers need to re-examine their policies to include expedited decisions and appeals and removal of arbitrary age cutoffs so that YA patients can gain easier access to PBT. Furthermore, consensus guidelines encouraging greater PBT access for YA may be warranted from both medical societies and/or AYA experts.
Collapse
|
19
|
Guerreiro F, Svensson S, Seravalli E, Traneus E, Raaymakers BW. Intra-fractional per-beam adaptive workflow to mitigate the need for a rotating gantry during MRI-guided proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34298523 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac176f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The integration of real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guidance and proton therapy would potentially improve the proton dose steering capability by reducing daily uncertainties due to anatomical variations. The use of a fixed beamline coupled with an axial patient couch rotation would greatly simplify the proton delivery with MRI-guidance. Nonetheless, it is mandatory to assure that the plan quality is not deteriorated by the anatomical deformations due to patient rotation. In this work, an in-house tool allowing for intra-fractional per-beam adaptation of intensity-modulated proton plans (BeamAdapt) was implemented through features available in RayStation. A set of three MRIs was acquired for two healthy volunteers (V1, V2): (1) no rotation/static, (2) rotation to the right and (3) left. V1 was rotated by 15º, to simulate a clinical pediatric abdominal case and V2 by 45º, to simulate an extreme patient rotation case. For each volunteer, a total of four intensity-modulated pencil beam scanning plans were optimized on the static MRI using virtual abdominal targets and 2-3 posterior-oblique beams. Beam angles were defined according to the angulations on the rotated MRIs. With BeamAdapt, each original plan was first converted into separate plans with one beam per plan. In an iterative order, individual beam doses were non-rigidly deformed to the rotated anatomies and re-optimized accounting for the consequent deformations and the beam doses delivered so far. For evaluation, the final adapted dose distribution was propagated back to the static MRI. Planned and adapted dose distributions were compared by computing relative differences between dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics. Absolute target dose differences were on average below 1% and mean dose organs-at-risk differences were below 3%. With BeamAdapt, not only intra-fractional per-beam proton plan adaptation coupled with axial patient rotation is possible but also the need for a rotating gantry during MRI-guidance might be mitigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipa Guerreiro
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht Imaging Division, Utrecht, NETHERLANDS
| | | | - Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht Imaging Division, Utrecht, NETHERLANDS
| | - Erik Traneus
- RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Stockholm, SWEDEN
| | - Bas W Raaymakers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht Imaging Division, Utrecht, NETHERLANDS
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Indelicato DJ, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Bradley JA, Mailhot-Vega RB, Morris CG, Tarbell NJ, Yock T, MacDonald SM. Proton Therapy for Pediatric Ependymoma: Mature Results From a Bicentric Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:815-820. [PMID: 33508372 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the long-term efficacy and toxicity of proton therapy for pediatric ependymoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2000 and 2019, 386 children with nonmetastatic grade 2/3 intracranial ependymoma received proton therapy at 1 of 2 academic institutions. Median age at treatment was 3.8 years (range, 0.7-21.3); 56% were male. Most (72%) tumors were in the posterior fossa and classified as World Health Organization grade 3 (65%). Eighty-five percent had a gross total or near total tumor resection before radiation therapy; 30% received chemotherapy. Median radiation dose was 55.8 Gy relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) (range, 50.4-59.4). RESULTS Median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 0.4-16.7). The 7-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 77.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.9%-81.5%), 63.8% (95% CI, 58.0%-68.8%), and 82.2% (95% CI, 77.2%-86.3%), respectively. Subtotal resection was associated with inferior local control (59% vs 80%; P < .005), progression-free survival (48% vs 66%; P < .001), and overall survival (70% vs 84%; P < .05). Male sex was associated with inferior progression-free (60% vs 69%; P < .05) and overall survival (76% vs 89%; P < .05). Posterior fossa tumor site was also associated with inferior progression-free (59% vs 74%; P < .05) and overall survival (79% vs 89%; P < .01). Twenty-one patients (5.4%) required hearing aids; of these, 13 received cisplatin, including the 3 with bilateral hearing loss. Forty-five patients (11.7%) required hormone replacement, typically growth hormone (38/45). The cumulative incidence of grade 2+ brain stem toxicity was 4% and occurred more often in patients who received >54 GyRBE. Two patients (0.5%) died of brain stem necrosis. The second-malignancy rate was 0.8%. CONCLUSION Proton therapy offers disease control commensurate with modern photon therapy without unexpected toxicity. The high rate of long-term survival justifies efforts to reduce radiation exposure in this young population. Independent of radiation modality, this large series confirms extent of resection as the most important modifiable factor for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | | | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Raymond B Mailhot-Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Eaton BR, Schwarz R, Vatner R, Yeh B, Claude L, Indelicato DJ, Laack N. Osteosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28352. [PMID: 32779875 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Osteosarcoma is a rare tumor that requires complex multidisciplinary management. This paper reviews the general management and standard radiotherapy guidelines for osteosarcoma in both North America and Europe in a joined effort between the Children's Oncology Group and International Society of Pediatric Oncology. Standard treatment involves multiagent induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection for local tumor control and consolidation local control to metastatic sites. Radiotherapy is reserved for cases with a marginal or incomplete resection or for definitive treatment in the case of unresectable disease. We present supporting data for the role of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bree R Eaton
- Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rudolf Schwarz
- Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Outpatient Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ralph Vatner
- Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Brian Yeh
- Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Line Claude
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Nadia Laack
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Eaton BR, Claude L, Indelicato DJ, Vatner R, Yeh B, Schwarz R, Laack N. Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28355. [PMID: 33818887 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Ewing sarcoma is a rare tumor that requires complex multidisciplinary management. This report describes the general management and standard radiotherapy guidelines in both North America (Children's Oncology Group) and Europe (International Society of Pediatric Oncology). Standard treatment involves multiagent induction chemotherapy followed by local treatment with surgery, definitive radiation, or a combination of surgery and radiation followed by additional chemotherapy and consolidation local treatment to metastatic sites. The data supporting the role of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation and specific radiation therapy guidelines are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bree R Eaton
- Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Line Claude
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Ralph Vatner
- Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Brian Yeh
- Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Rudolf Schwarz
- Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Outpatient Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nadia Laack
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Patterns of care for pediatric patients with newly-diagnosed grade II gliomas. Childs Nerv Syst 2021; 37:1563-1572. [PMID: 33404712 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-05002-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe large-scale demographic, initial treatment, and outcomes data for pediatric grade II gliomas included in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014. METHODS Our cohort included cases less than 21 years of age with pathology-confirmed disease. Logistic regressions were used to evaluate the use of chemotherapy (CT) and radiation therapy (RT). Overall survival (OS) rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test. RESULTS We identified 803 cases with astrocytoma (56.2%), oligodendroglioma (26.0%), and mixed glioma/glioma NOS (17.8%) histologies. Most cases underwent surgical resection (n = 661). Whereas cases 16 to 21 years of age were more likely than cases 0 to 5 years to receive RT (OR = 7.38, 95% CI 3.58-15.21, p < 0.001), they were less likely to receive CT (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.52, p < 0.001). The 5-year OS rates for all cases, cases that underwent surgical resection, and cases managed with biopsy were 87.5%, 92.7%, and 63.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION In one of the largest series of pediatric grade II gliomas, astrocytoma was the most common histology. Patterns of care and OS outcomes were similar to grade I gliomas, with surgical resection being the most common initial treatment and associated with a favorable rate of OS. Younger patients were more likely to receive post-operative CT and the use of RT increased with age.
Collapse
|
24
|
Guerreiro F, Seravalli E, Janssens G, Maduro J, Knopf A, Langendijk J, Raaymakers B, Kontaxis C. Deep learning prediction of proton and photon dose distributions for paediatric abdominal tumours. Radiother Oncol 2021; 156:36-42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
25
|
Gallagher KJ, Youssef B, Georges R, Mahajan A, Feghali JA, Nabha R, Ayoub Z, Jalbout W, Taddei PJ. Proton Radiotherapy Could Reduce the Risk of Fatal Second Cancers for Children with Intracranial Tumors in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Int J Part Ther 2021; 7:1-10. [PMID: 33829068 PMCID: PMC8019578 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00041.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To test our hypothesis that, for young children with intracranial tumors, proton radiotherapy in a high-income country does not reduce the risk of a fatal subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMN) compared with photon radiotherapy in low- and middle-income countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively selected 9 pediatric patients with low-grade brain tumors who were treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in low- and middle-income countries. Images and contours were deidentified and transferred to a high-income country proton therapy center. Clinically commissioned treatment planning systems of each academic hospital were used to calculate absorbed dose from the therapeutic fields. After fusing supplemental computational phantoms to the patients' anatomies, models from the literature were applied to calculate stray radiation doses. Equivalent doses were determined in organs and tissues at risk of SMNs, and the lifetime attributable risk of SMN mortality (LAR) was predicted using a dose-effect model. Our hypothesis test was based on the average of the ratios of LARs from proton therapy to that of photon therapy ()(H0: = 1; H A : < 1). RESULTS Proton therapy reduced the equivalent dose in organs at risk for SMNs and LARs compared with photon therapy for which the for the cohort was 0.69 ± 0.10, resulting in the rejection of H0 (P < .001, α = 0.05). We observed that the younger children in the cohort (2-4 years old) were at a factor of approximately 2.5 higher LAR compared with the older children (8-12 years old). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that proton radiotherapy has the strong potential of reducing the risk of fatal SMNs in pediatric patients with intracranial tumors if it were made available globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle J. Gallagher
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Bassem Youssef
- American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rola Georges
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Racile Nabha
- American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Zeina Ayoub
- American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Wassim Jalbout
- American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Phillip J. Taddei
- American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- Radiation Oncology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Otterlei OM, Indelicato DJ, Toussaint L, Ytre-Hauge KS, Pilskog S, Fjaera LF, Rørvik E, Pettersen HES, Muren LP, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Di Pinto M, Stokkevåg CH. Variation in relative biological effectiveness for cognitive structures in proton therapy of pediatric brain tumors. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:267-274. [PMID: 33131367 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1840626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinically, a constant value of 1.1 is used for the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons, whereas in vitro the RBE has been shown to vary depending on physical dose, tissue type, and linear energy transfer (LET). As the LET increases at the distal end of the proton beam, concerns exist for an elevated RBE in normal tissues. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the heterogeneity of RBE to brain structures associated with cognition (BSCs) in pediatric suprasellar tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans for 10 pediatric craniopharyngioma patients were re-calculated using 11 phenomenological and two plan-based variable RBE models. Based on LET, tissue dependence and number of data points used to fit the models, the three RBE models considered the most relevant for the studied endpoint were selected. Thirty BSCs were investigated in terms of RBE and dose/volume parameters. RESULTS For a representative patient, the median (range) dose-weighted mean RBE (RBEd) across all BSCs from the plan-based models was among the lowest (1.09 (1.02-1.52) vs. the phenomenological models at 1.21 (0.78-2.24)). Omitting tissue dependency resulted in RBEd at 1.21 (1.04-2.24). Across all patients, the narrower RBE model selection gave median RBEd values from 1.22 to 1.30. CONCLUSION For all BSCs, there was a systematic model-dependent variation in RBEd, mirroring the uncertainty in biological effects of protons. According to a refined selection of in vitro models, the RBE variation across BSCs was in effect underestimated when using a fixed RBE of 1.1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laura Toussaint
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Sara Pilskog
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Eivind Rørvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Ludvig P. Muren
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Marcos Di Pinto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Camilla H. Stokkevåg
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Advances in multimodality care for patients with pediatric cancer continues to improve long-term survival. The use of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy may lead to debilitating late effects in childhood cancer survivors. It is critically important to understand, mitigate, and screen for late effects to improve the quality of life in childhood cancer survivors. This review summarizes the use of radiotherapy in children, radiobiology of tissue injury, impact of age on late effects, important organ systems affected by radiotherapy during survivorship, and screening for radiotherapy late effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Matthew D Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute and Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Suzanne Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Judy DiMarzo Cancer Survivorship Program, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, PO Box 647, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu KX, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Susko MS, Rao AD, Yeap BY, Snijders AM, Ladra MM, Vogel J, Zaslowe-Dude C, Marcus KJ, Yock TI, Grassberger C, Braunstein SE, Haas-Kogan DA, Terezakis SA, MacDonald SM. A Multi-institutional Comparative Analysis of Proton and Photon Therapy-Induced Hematologic Toxicity in Patients With Medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:726-735. [PMID: 33243479 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This multi-institutional retrospective study sought to examine the hematologic effects of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma using proton or photon therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Clinical and treatment characteristics were recorded for 97 pediatric patients with medulloblastoma who received CSI without concurrent chemotherapy or with concurrent single-agent vincristine from 2000 to 2017. Groups of 60 and 37 patients underwent treatment with proton-based and photon-based therapy, respectively. Overall survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test. Comparisons of blood counts at each timepoint were conducted using multiple t tests with Bonferroni corrections. Univariate and multivariate analyses of time to grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity were performed with Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Median age of patients receiving proton and photon CSI was 7.5 years (range, 3.5-22.7 years) and 9.9 years (range, 3.6-19.5 years), respectively. Most patients had a diagnosis of standard risk medulloblastoma, with 86.7% and 89.2% for the proton and photon cohorts, respectively. Median total dose to involved field or whole posterior fossa was 54.0 Gy/Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and median CSI dose was 23.4 Gy/Gy(RBE) (range, 18-36 Gy/Gy[RBE]) for both cohorts. Counts were significantly higher in the proton cohort compared with the photon cohort in weeks 3 to 6 of radiation therapy (RT). Although white blood cell counts did not differ between the 2 cohorts, patients receiving proton RT had significantly higher lymphocyte counts throughout the RT course. Similar results were observed when excluding patients who received vertebral body sparing proton RT or limiting to those receiving 23.4 Gy. Only photon therapy was associated with decreased time to grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity on univariate and multivariable analyses. No difference in overall survival was observed, and lymphopenia did not predict survival. CONCLUSIONS Patients who receive CSI using proton therapy experience significantly decreased hematologic toxicity compared with those receiving photon therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin X Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Myrsini Ioakeim-Ioannidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew S Susko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Avani D Rao
- Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Beow Y Yeap
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Antoine M Snijders
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
| | - Matthew M Ladra
- Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer Vogel
- Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Cierra Zaslowe-Dude
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen J Marcus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steve E Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie A Terezakis
- Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sütterlin AL, Demmert M, Kovács G, Claviez A, Schulz C, Lauten M. Interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) achieves very good long-term quality of life in children and adolescents with soft-tissue sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28464. [PMID: 32706504 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective local therapy (surgery, radiation) and systemic multidrug chemotherapy are mandatory for curing childhood sarcoma. The standard radiation therapy for pediatric patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Because EBRT may cause long-term side effects with adverse effects on the patients' health and quality of life (QoL), alternative strategies are required. Interventional radiotherapy (IRT; brachytherapy) is established as a standard treatment for several tumors in adulthood. Single-center series have reported low levels of late effects and improved QoL in survivors treated with IRT in childhood. However, IRT is still applied infrequently in pediatric patients. METHODS Thirty patients with STS were treated with IRT between 1992 and 2012 at the University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Germany. Five patients were lost to follow-up, and 25 patients (mean age at time of data collection 24.8 years [range, 10.7-36.1]) could be analyzed focusing on overall survival and QoL (EORTC-C30 questionnaire). For more detailed information regarding general and health-specific questions, a separate questionnaire was developed. RESULTS Nineteen of 25 patients were alive 13.4 [1.6-25.2] years after first cancer disease, and the three-year overall survival was 76% (SE, 0.09). The score of QoL/global health status (76.2 [16.6-100]) in our patients outvalues the European (66.1) and equals the German (75.9) reference value. CONCLUSION IRT is an effective treatment option for pediatric patients with localized STS. Its role among other radiation dose-sparing techniques such as proton beam therapy has to be defined in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lotte Sütterlin
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Martin Demmert
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - György Kovács
- Department of Radiotherapy, Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.,Gemelli INTERACTS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alexander Claviez
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Melchior Lauten
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Age as a decisive factor in general anaesthesia use in paediatric proton beam therapy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:15096. [PMID: 32934278 PMCID: PMC7493927 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72223-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy for paediatric cancer patients is an effective treatment; however, young children have may have difficulties staying still during irradiation. This study investigated the indication of general anaesthesia in paediatric proton therapy. Background information and anaesthesia/treatment protocols were retrospectively extracted from the medical records of cancer patients under 15 years who underwent proton therapy at Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan between April 2016 and December 2018. The anaesthesia and non-anaesthesia groups were compared to evaluate factors determining the need for general anaesthesia. Thirty-two patients who received 285 irradiations were analysed. The median age was 5 years old (range: 1–15), and 13 patients (40.6%) were female. Twelve (37.5%) patients received general anaesthesia. In the general anaesthesia group, airway management using a laryngeal mask was performed in 11 patients (91.6%). Patient age was significantly lower in the general anaesthesia group than in the non-anaesthetised group (p < 0.001). Considering all background factors, only age was strongly associated with anaesthesia in the univariate logistic regression model (odds ratio 0.55 [95% confidence interval 0.35–0.86]; P < 0.01). Thus, age is one of the most important factors determining the need for general anaesthesia during proton therapy in children.
Collapse
|
31
|
Yeom YS, Griffin K, Mille M, Jung JW, Lee C, Lee C. A dose voxel kernel method for rapid reconstruction of out-of-field neutron dose of patients in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:175015. [PMID: 32726766 PMCID: PMC10182832 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abaa5f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport methods are used for dose calculation as 'gold standard.' However, the method is computationally time-consuming and thus impractical for normal tissue dose reconstructions for the large number of proton therapy patients required for epidemiologic investigations of late health effects. In the present study, we developed a new dose calculation method for the rapid reconstruction of out-of-field neutron dose to patients undergoing pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. The new dose calculation method is based on neutron dose voxel kernels (DVKs) generated by MC simulations of a proton pencil beam irradiating a water phantom (60 × 60 × 300 cm3), which was conducted using a MC proton therapy simulation code, TOPAS. The DVKs were generated for 19 beam energies (from 70 to 250 MeV with the 10 MeV interval) and three range shifter thicknesses (1, 3, and 5 cm). An in-house program was written in C++ to superimpose the DVKs onto a patient CT images according to proton beam characteristics (energy, position, and direction) available in treatment plans. The DVK dose calculation method was tested by calculating organ/tissue-specific neutron doses of 1- and 5-year-old whole-body computational phantoms where intracranial and craniospinal irradiations were simulated. The DVK-based doses generally showed reasonable agreement with those calculated by direct MC simulations with a detailed PBS model that were previously published, with differences mostly less than 30% and 10% for the intracranial and craniospinal irradiations, respectively. The computation time of the DVK method for one patient ranged from 1 to 30 min on a single CPU core of a personal computer, demonstrating significant improvement over the direct MC dose calculation requiring several days on high-performance computing servers. Our DVK-based dose calculation method will be useful when dosimetry is needed for the large number of patients such as for epidemiologic or clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Soo Yeom
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Uezono H, Indelicato DJ, Rotondo RL, Mailhot Vega RB, Bradfield SM, Morris CG, Bradley JA. Treatment Outcomes After Proton Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma of the Pelvis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:974-981. [PMID: 32437922 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis is associated with inferior local control compared with those arising from other primary sites. Despite its increased use, outcome data for treatment with proton therapy remain limited. We report 3-year disease control and toxicity in pediatric patients treated with proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-five patients aged ≤21 years (median, 14 years) with nonmetastatic pelvic Ewing sarcoma received proton therapy and chemotherapy between 2010 and 2018. Overall survival and tumor control rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A log-rank test assessed significance between strata of prognostic factors. Significant toxicity was reported per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS Most patients received definitive radiation (n = 26; median dose 55.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]; range, 54.0-64.8), 7 received preoperative radiation (50.4 Gy RBE), and 2 received postoperative radiation (45 Gy RBE and 54 Gy RBE). The median primary tumor size was 10.5 cm. With a median follow-up of 3 years (range, 0.3-9.0 years), the 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65%-93%), 64% (95% CI, 45%-79%), and 92% (95% CI, 74%-98%), respectively. There was no association between local control, progression-free survival, or overall survival and tumor size, patient age, radiation dose, or definitive versus pre-/postoperative radiation therapy. Median time to progression was 1 year (range, 0.1-1.9 years). All patients with large tumors (≥8 cm) who underwent definitive proton therapy with a higher dose (≥59.4 Gy RBE) remained free from tumor recurrence (n = 5). Five patients experienced grade ≥2 subacute/late toxicity, all of whom were treated with combined surgery and radiation. CONCLUSIONS Definitive proton therapy offers local control comparable to photon therapy in pediatric patients with pelvic Ewing sarcoma. These data lend preliminary support to radiation dose escalation without significant toxicity, which may contribute to the favorable outcomes. Combined surgery and radiation therapy, particularly preoperative radiation, is associated with postoperative complications, but not survival, compared with radiation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haruka Uezono
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Ronny L Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Raymond B Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Scott M Bradfield
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Nemours Children's Specialty Care, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, State of Science in radiation oncology and priorities for clinical trials meeting report. Eur J Cancer 2020; 131:76-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
34
|
Yeom YS, Kuzmin G, Griffin K, Mille M, Polf J, Langner U, Jung JW, Lee C, Ellis D, Shin J, Lee C. A Monte Carlo model for organ dose reconstruction of patients in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for epidemiologic studies of late effects. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2020; 40:225-242. [PMID: 31509813 PMCID: PMC10065358 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab437d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Significant efforts such as the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) involving multiple proton therapy centers have been made to conduct collaborative studies evaluating outcomes following proton therapy. As a groundwork dosimetry effort for the late effect investigation, we developed a Monte Carlo (MC) model of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) to estimate organ/tissue doses of pediatric patients at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center (MPTC), one of the proton centers involved in the PPCR. The MC beam modeling was performed using the TOPAS (TOol for PArticle Simulation) MC code and commissioned to match measurement data within 1% for range, and 0.3 mm for spot sizes. The established MC model was then tested by calculating organ/tissue doses for sample intracranial and craniospinal irradiations on whole-body pediatric computational human phantoms. The simulated dose distributions were compared with the treatment planning system dose distributions, showing the 3 mm/3% gamma index passing rates of 94%-99%, validating our simulations with the MC model. The calculated organ/tissue doses per prescribed doses for the craniospinal irradiations (1 mGy Gy-1 to 1 Gy Gy-1) were generally much higher than those for the intracranial irradiations (2.1 μGy Gy-1 to 0.1 Gy Gy-1), which is due to the larger field coverage of the craniospinal irradiations. The largest difference was observed at the adrenal dose, i.e. ∼3000 times. In addition, the calculated organ/tissue doses were compared with those calculated with a simplified MC model, showing that the beam properties (i.e. spot size, spot divergence, mean energy, and energy spread) do not significantly influence dose calculations despite the limited irradiation cases. This implies that the use of the MC model commissioned to the MPTC measurement data might be dosimetrically acceptable for patient dose reconstructions at other proton centers particularly when their measurement data are unavailable. The developed MC model will be used to reconstruct organ/tissue doses for MPTC pediatric patients collected in the PPCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Soo Yeom
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Greenberger BA, Yock TI. The role of proton therapy in pediatric malignancies: Recent advances and future directions. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:8-22. [PMID: 32139101 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has promised an advantage in safely treating pediatric malignancies with an increased capability to spare normal tissues, reducing the risk of both acute and late toxicity. The past decade has seen the proliferation of more than 30 proton facilities in the United States, with increased capacity to provide access to approximately 3,000 children per year who will require radiotherapy for their disease. We provide a review of the initial efforts to describe outcomes after proton therapy across the common pediatric disease sites. We discuss the main attempts to assess comparative efficacy between proton and photon radiotherapy concerning toxicity. We also discuss recent efforts of multi-institutional registries aimed at accelerating research to better define the optimal treatment paradigm for children requiring radiotherapy for cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Oh D. Proton therapy: the current status of the clinical evidences. PRECISION AND FUTURE MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.23838/pfm.2019.00058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
37
|
Komori K, Saito S, Araya M, Morita D, Kurata T, Hirabayashi K, Tanaka M, Koiwai K, Tauchi K, Masaki H, Nakazawa Y. Proton Beam Therapy for Adolescent Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma With Residual Tumor After Intensive Chemotherapy: A Case Report. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:333-337. [PMID: 31128305 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2019] [Revised: 05/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kazutoshi Komori
- Department of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Nagano Children's Hospital, Azumino, Japan
| | - Shoji Saito
- Department of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
| | - Masayuki Araya
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Daisuke Morita
- Department of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Kurata
- Department of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Nagano Children's Hospital, Azumino, Japan
| | - Koichi Hirabayashi
- Department of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Miyuki Tanaka
- Department of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Koiwai
- Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Katsunori Tauchi
- Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Masaki
- Department of Radiology, Kameda General Hospital, Kamogawa, Japan
| | - Yozo Nakazawa
- Department of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ohno T, Okamoto M. Carbon ion radiotherapy as a treatment modality for paediatric cancers. THE LANCET CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2019; 3:371-372. [PMID: 30948250 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(19)30106-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Ohno
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, 371-8511 Showa 3-39-22, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
| | - Masahiko Okamoto
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, 371-8511 Showa 3-39-22, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| |
Collapse
|