1
|
Eekers DBP, Zegers CML, Ahmed KA, Amelio D, Gupta T, Harrabi SB, Kazda T, Scartoni D, Seidel C, Shih HA, Minniti G. Controversies in neuro-oncology: Focal proton versus photon radiation therapy for adult brain tumors. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:369-382. [PMID: 39006517 PMCID: PMC11241386 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) plays a fundamental role in the treatment of malignant and benign brain tumors. Current state-of-the-art photon- and proton-based RT combines more conformal dose distribution of target volumes and accurate dose delivery while limiting the adverse radiation effects. PubMed was systematically searched from from 2000 to October 2023 to identify studies reporting outcomes related to treatment of central nervous system (CNS)/skull base tumors with PT in adults. Several studies have demonstrated that proton therapy (PT) provides a reduced dose to healthy brain parenchyma compared with photon-based (xRT) radiation techniques. However, whether dosimetric advantages translate into superior clinical outcomes for different adult brain tumors remains an open question. This review aims at critically reviewing the recent studies on PT in adult patients with brain tumors, including glioma, meningiomas, and chordomas, to explore its potential benefits compared with xRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle B P Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina M L Zegers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Departments of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Dante Amelio
- Trento Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC/TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Trento Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kotecha R, Schiff D, Chakravarti A, Fleming JL, Brown PD, Puduvalli VK, Vogelbaum MA, Gondi V, Gallus M, Okada H, Mehta MP. Multidisciplinary Management of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutated Gliomas in a Contemporary Molecularly Defined Era. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2588-2598. [PMID: 38833641 PMCID: PMC11283772 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes, an early step in the ontogeny of lower-grade gliomas, induce global epigenetic changes characterized by a hypermethylation phenotype and are critical to tumor classification, treatment decision making, and estimation of patient prognosis. The introduction of IDH inhibitors to block the oncogenic neomorphic function of the mutated protein has resulted in new therapeutic options for these patients. To appreciate the implications of these recent IDH inhibitor results, it is important to juxtapose historical outcomes with chemoradiotherapy. Herein, we rationally evaluate recent IDH inhibitor data within historical precedents to guide contemporary decisions regarding the role of observation, maximal safe resection, adjuvant therapies, and the import of patient and tumor variables. The biological underpinnings of the IDH pathway and the mechanisms, impact, and limitations of IDH inhibitors, the actual magnitude of tumor regression and patient benefit, and emergence of resistance pathways are presented to guide future trial development. Management in the current, molecularly defined era will require careful patient selection and risk factor assessment, followed by an open dialog about the results of studies such as INDIGO, as well as mature data from legacy trials, and a discussion about risk-versus-benefit for the choice of treatment, with multidisciplinary decision making as an absolute prerequisite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| | - David Schiff
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology, Neurological Surgery, and Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Jessica L. Fleming
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Paul D. Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Vinay K. Puduvalli
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine West Region, Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University, Warrenville, IL
| | - Marco Gallus
- Department of Neurosurgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA
| | - Hideho Okada
- Department of Neurosurgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA
| | - Minesh P. Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li X, Zhang Y, Ye Y, Tian S, Hu T, Chai H, Zhang T, Wen F. Carbon-ion radiotherapy alone vs. standard dose photon radiation with carbon-ion radiotherapy boost for high-grade gliomas: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:837. [PMID: 39003464 PMCID: PMC11245814 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12606-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the survival outcome and side effects in patients with primary high-grade glioma (HGG) who received carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) alone or as a boost strategy after photon radiation (photon + CIRTboost). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-four (34) patients with histologically confirmed HGG and received CIRT alone or Photon + CIRTboost, with concurrent temozolomide between 2020.03-2023.08 in Wuwei Cancer Hospital & Institute, China were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and acute and late toxicities were analyzed and compared. RESULTS Eight WHO grade 3 and 26 grade 4 patients were included in the analysis. The median PFS in the CIRT alone and Photon + CIRTboost groups were 15 and 19 months respectively for all HGG cases, and 15 and 17.5 months respectively for grade 4 cases. The median OS in the CIRT alone and Photon + CIRTboost groups were 28 and 31 months respectively for all HGG cases, and 21 and 19 months respectively for grade 4 cases. No significant difference in these survival outcomes was observed between the CIRT alone and Photon + CIRTboost groups. Only grade 1 acute toxicities were observed in CIRT alone and Photon + CIRTboost groups. CIRT alone group had a significantly lower ratio of acute toxicities compared to Photon + CIRTboost (3/18 vs. 9/16, p = 0.03). No significant difference in late toxicities was observed. CONCLUSION Both CIRT alone and Photon + CIRTboost with concurrent temozolomide are safe, without significant differences in PFS and OS in HGG patients. It is meaningful to explore whether dose escalation of CIRTboost might improve survival outcomes of HGG patients in future randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- XiaoJun Li
- Heavy Ion Radiotherapy Department, Wuwei Cancer Hospital & Institute, Wuwei Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 31 Sanitary Lane, Haizang Road, Wuwei, 733000, Gansu Province, China
| | - YanShan Zhang
- Heavy Ion Radiotherapy Department, Wuwei Cancer Hospital & Institute, Wuwei Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 31 Sanitary Lane, Haizang Road, Wuwei, 733000, Gansu Province, China
| | - YanCheng Ye
- Heavy Ion Radiotherapy Department, Wuwei Cancer Hospital & Institute, Wuwei Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 31 Sanitary Lane, Haizang Road, Wuwei, 733000, Gansu Province, China.
| | - SuQing Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - TingChao Hu
- Heavy Ion Radiotherapy Department, Wuwei Cancer Hospital & Institute, Wuwei Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 31 Sanitary Lane, Haizang Road, Wuwei, 733000, Gansu Province, China
| | - HongYu Chai
- Heavy Ion Radiotherapy Department, Wuwei Cancer Hospital & Institute, Wuwei Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 31 Sanitary Lane, Haizang Road, Wuwei, 733000, Gansu Province, China
| | - TianE Zhang
- Heavy Ion Radiotherapy Department, Wuwei Cancer Hospital & Institute, Wuwei Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 31 Sanitary Lane, Haizang Road, Wuwei, 733000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Faxin Wen
- Heavy Ion Radiotherapy Department, Wuwei Cancer Hospital & Institute, Wuwei Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 31 Sanitary Lane, Haizang Road, Wuwei, 733000, Gansu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zugman M, Haslam A, Prasad V. INDIGO: Example of inappropriate crossover and why PFS cannot be the primary outcome in gliomas. J Cancer Policy 2024; 40:100476. [PMID: 38588795 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Zugman
- Centro de Oncologia e Hematologia Einstein Família Dayan-Daycoval, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alyson Haslam
- Centro de Oncologia e Hematologia Einstein Família Dayan-Daycoval, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil; University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
| | - Vinay Prasad
- University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, 2nd Fl, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al-Lami BS, Al-Lami BS, Al-Lami YS. Survival outcomes after using charged particle radiotherapy as a treatment modality for gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2024; 55:101410. [PMID: 38670903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Charged particle therapy is an emerging radiation treatment for a number of tumors; however, more research is needed to determine its safety and efficacy when treating intra-axial brain tumors (commonly known as gliomas). The overall survival of patients treated with charged particle radiation versus those receiving photon therapy were compared in this systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS The databases used as part of the search strategy were the following: MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane. The search was conducted in order to find pertinent clinical studies. A random-effect meta-analysis was used to generate pooled estimates of overall survival at 1,3, and 5 years. RESULTS Nineteen studies with a total of 1140 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Following treatment, the patient's follow-up period lasted 44.4 months (range: 14.3 - 91.2 months). At one year (relative risk 1.17, 95% CI 1.07 - 1.28; p = 0.049), three years (relative risk 1.73, 95% CI 1.41 - 2.12; p = 0.001), and five years (relative risk 2.00, 95% CI 1.52 - 2.63; p = 0.005), charged particle radiotherapy had a significantly higher pooled overall survival than photon therapy. CONCLUSION Charged particle therapy could be associated with better clinical outcomes for patients with gliomas compared to photon therapy. More prospective randomized trials and comparative studies are strongly encouraged to enable accurate meta-analysis and a better exploration of prognosis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Yu H, He S, He Y, Dai G, Fu Y, Zeng X, Liu M, Ai P. Dosimetric comparison of advanced radiation techniques for scalp-sparing in low-grade gliomas. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02229-3. [PMID: 38649484 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02229-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alopecia causes significant distress for patients and negatively impacts quality of life for low-grade glioma (LGG) patients. We aimed to compare and evaluate variations in dose distribution for scalp-sparing in LGG patients with proton therapy and photon therapy, namely intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (HT). METHODS This retrospective study utilized a dataset comprising imaging data from 22 patients with LGG who underwent postoperative radiotherapy. Treatment plans were generated for each patient with scalp-optimized (SO) approaches and scalp-non-optimized (SNO) approaches using proton techniques and photons techniques; all plans adhered to the same dose constraint of delivering a total radiation dose of 54.04 Gy to the target volume. All treatment plans were subsequently analyzed. RESULTS All the plans generated in this study met the dose constraints for the target volume and OARs. The SO plans resulted in reduced maximum scalp dose (Dmax), mean scalp dose (Dmean), and volume of the scalp receiving 30 Gy (V30) and 40 Gy (V40) compared with SNO plans in all radiation techniques. Among all radiation techniques, the IMPT plans exhibited superior performance compared to other plans for dose homogeneity as for SO plans. Also, IMPT showed lower values for Dmean and Dmax than all photon radiation techniques. CONCLUSION Our study provides evidence that the SO approach is a feasible technique for reducing scalp radiation dose. However, it is imperative to conduct prospective trials to assess the benefits associated with this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Yu
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Shuangshuang He
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China
| | - Yisong He
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, 610072, Chengdu, China
| | - Guyu Dai
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yuchuan Fu
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xianhu Zeng
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Mengyuan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China
| | - Ping Ai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ek L, Elwin M, Neander K. Neuropsychological longitudinal study of patients with low-grade gliomas: Cognitive impairment. APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY. ADULT 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38470840 DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2325546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
This study is part of a longitudinal research program, in which patients diagnosed with low-grade gliomas (LGG: n = 13), as well as healthy controls (n = 13), were consecutively recruited and neuropsychologically followed for 7 years. The patients are followed up regardless of variations in treatment. A composite score is used (Global Deficit Score: GDS) included cognitive measures where at least five patients had a negative change: information processing speed, speed of naming, construction ability, verbal fluency, non-verbal thinking, and immediate non-verbal memory. The most important finding in this 7-year follow-up study is that two-thirds of the patients developed cognitive impairment. The remaining third of the patients showed stability in their cognitive ability and were still alive 17 years after diagnosis. Younger patients with tumors in the right frontal or posterior regions showed a more favorable development. Patients with frontal tumors and a declined GDS show also significant changes in executive functions. Given the limited number, no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the impact of tumor localization. The impact of LGG on cognition and the survival time after diagnosis varies considerably between patients. However, most of the patients (69%) showed cognitive impairment during the seven years we followed them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Ek
- Department of Rehabilitation, Hässleholm Hospital, Hässleholm, Sweden
| | - Marie Elwin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Health Care Research Centre, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Kerstin Neander
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Health Care Research Centre, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kotecha R, La Rosa A, Mehta MP. How proton therapy fits into the management of adult intracranial tumors. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S26-S45. [PMID: 38437667 PMCID: PMC10911801 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Intracranial tumors include a challenging array of primary and secondary parenchymal and extra-axial tumors which cause neurologic morbidity consequential to location, disease extent, and proximity to critical neurologic structures. Radiotherapy can be used in the definitive, adjuvant, or salvage setting either with curative or palliative intent. Proton therapy (PT) is a promising advance due to dosimetric advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy with regards to normal tissue sparing, as well as distinct physical properties, which yield radiobiologic benefits. In this review, the principles of efficacy and safety of PT for a variety of intracranial tumors are discussed, drawing upon case series, retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and randomized clinical trials. This manuscript explores the potential advantages of PT, including reduced acute and late treatment-related side effects and improved quality of life. The objective is to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence and clinical outcomes of PT. Given the lack of consensus and directives for its utilization in patients with intracranial tumors, we aim to provide a guide for its judicious use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Translational Medicine, Hebert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alonso La Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kinslow CJ, Brown PD, Iwamoto FM, Wu CC, Yu JB, Cheng SK, Wang TJC. Where Do We (INDI)GO From Here? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:330-333. [PMID: 38220255 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Connor J Kinslow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Fabio M Iwamoto
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York; Department of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Cheng-Chia Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Simon K Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Willmann J, Leiser D, Weber DC. Oncological Outcomes, Long-Term Toxicities, Quality of Life and Sexual Health after Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Therapy in Patients with Low-Grade Glioma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5287. [PMID: 37958460 PMCID: PMC10649084 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess oncological outcomes, toxicities, quality of life (QoL) and sexual health (SH) of low-grade glioma (LGG) patients treated with pencil-beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT). MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 89 patients with LGG (Neurofibromatosis type 1; n = 4 (4.5%) patients) treated with PBS-PT (median dose 54 Gy (RBE)) from 1999 to 2022 at our institution. QoL was prospectively assessed during PBS-PT and yearly during follow-up from 2015 to 2023, while a cross-sectional exploration of SH was conducted in 2023. RESULTS Most LGGs (n = 58; 65.2%) were CNS WHO grade 2 and approximately half (n = 43; 48.3%) were located in the vicinity of the visual apparatus/thalamus. After a median follow-up of 50.2 months, 24 (27%) patients presented with treatment failures and most of these (n = 17/24; 70.8%) were salvaged. The 4-year overall survival was 89.1%. Only 2 (2.2%) and 1 (1.1%) patients presented with CTCAE grade 4 and 3 late radiation-induced toxicity, respectively. No grade 5 late adverse event was observed. The global health as a domain of QoL remained stable and comparable to the reference values during PBS-PT and for six years thereafter. Sexual satisfaction was comparable to the normative population. CONCLUSIONS LGG patients treated with PBS-PT achieved excellent long-term survival and tumor control, with exceptionally low rates of high-grade late toxicity, and favorable QoL and SH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Willmann
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (J.W.); (D.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dominic Leiser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (J.W.); (D.L.)
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (J.W.); (D.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Winter SF, Vaios EJ, Shih HA, Grassberger C, Parsons MW, Gardner MM, Ehret F, Kaul D, Boehmerle W, Endres M, Dietrich J. Mitigating Radiotoxicity in the Central Nervous System: Role of Proton Therapy. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1524-1549. [PMID: 37728819 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01131-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Central nervous system (CNS) radiotoxicity remains a challenge in neuro-oncology. Dose distribution advantages of protons over photons have prompted increased use of brain-directed proton therapy. While well-recognized among pediatric populations, the benefit of proton therapy among adults with CNS malignancies remains controversial. We herein discuss the role of protons in mitigating late CNS radiotoxicities in adult patients. Despite limited clinical trials, evidence suggests toxicity profile advantages of protons over conventional radiotherapy, including retention of neurocognitive function and brain volume. Modelling studies predict superior dose conformality of protons versus state-of-the-art photon techniques reduces late radiogenic vasculopathies, endocrinopathies, and malignancies. Conversely, potentially higher brain tissue necrosis rates following proton therapy highlight a need to resolve uncertainties surrounding the impact of variable biological effectiveness of protons on dose distribution. Clinical trials comparing best photon and particle-based therapy are underway to establish whether protons substantially improve long-term treatment-related outcomes in adults with CNS malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian F Winter
- Department of Neurology and MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Eugene J Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael W Parsons
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychology Assessment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa M Gardner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychology Assessment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Felix Ehret
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Boehmerle
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Endres
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- ExcellenceCluster NeuroCure, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Department of Neurology and MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pertz M, Schlömer S, Seidel C, Hentschel B, Löffler M, Schackert G, Krex D, Juratli T, Tonn JC, Schnell O, Vatter H, Simon M, Westphal M, Martens T, Sabel M, Bendszus M, Dörner N, Wick A, Fliessbach K, Hoppe C, Klingner M, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G, Gramatzki D, Weller M, Schlegel U. Long-term neurocognitive function and quality of life after multimodal therapy in adult glioma patients: a prospective long-term follow-up. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:353-366. [PMID: 37648934 PMCID: PMC10522752 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04419-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multimodal therapies have significantly improved prognosis in glioma. However, in particular radiotherapy may induce long-term neurotoxicity compromising patients' neurocognition and quality of life. The present prospective multicenter study aimed to evaluate associations of multimodal treatment with neurocognition with a particular focus on hippocampal irradiation. METHODS Seventy-one glioma patients (WHO grade 1-4) were serially evaluated with neurocognitive testing and quality of life questionnaires. Prior to (baseline) and following further treatment (median 7.1 years [range 4.6-11.0] after baseline) a standardized computerized neurocognitive test battery (NeuroCog FX) was applied to gauge psychomotor speed and inhibition, verbal short-term memory, working memory, verbal and non-verbal memory as well as verbal fluency. Mean ipsilateral hippocampal radiation dose was determined in a subgroup of 27 patients who received radiotherapy according to radiotherapy plans to evaluate its association with neurocognition. RESULTS Between baseline and follow-up mean performance in none of the cognitive domains significantly declined in any treatment modality (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, combined radio-chemotherapy, watchful-waiting), except for selective attention in patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Apart from one subtest (inhibition), mean ipsilateral hippocampal radiation dose > 50 Gy (Dmean) as compared to < 10 Gy showed no associations with long-term cognitive functioning. However, patients with Dmean < 10 Gy showed stable or improved performance in all cognitive domains, while patients with > 50 Gy numerically deteriorated in 4/8 domains. CONCLUSIONS Multimodal glioma therapy seems to affect neurocognition less than generally assumed. Even patients with unilateral hippocampal irradiation with > 50 Gy showed no profound cognitive decline in this series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Pertz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 105, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
| | - Sabine Schlömer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bettina Hentschel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Löffler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Gabriele Schackert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dietmar Krex
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tareq Juratli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Joerg Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Schnell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Matthias Simon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Bethel, University Hospital Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Manfred Westphal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Martens
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Asklepios St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Sabel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Center of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Dörner
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Center of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Antje Wick
- Neurology Clinic and National Centre for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Fliessbach
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Hoppe
- Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marcel Klingner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jörg Felsberg
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Dorothee Gramatzki
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of General Neurology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Uwe Schlegel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Hirslanden Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bouter J, Reznik Y, Thariat J. Effects on the Hypothalamo-Pituitary Axis in Patients with CNS or Head and Neck Tumors following Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3820. [PMID: 37568636 PMCID: PMC10417001 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge about the precise effects of radiotherapy on hypothalamo-pituitary functions is limited. Reduction of side effects is a major goal of advanced radiotherapy modalities. We assessed strategies for monitoring and replacement of hormone deficiencies in irradiated patients. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on PubMed®. Additional articles were retrieved to describe endocrine mechanisms. RESULTS 45 studies were evaluated from 2000 to 2022. They were predominantly retrospective and highly heterogeneous concerning patient numbers, tumor types, radiotherapy technique and follow-up. Endocrine deficiencies occurred in about 40% of patients within a median follow-up of 5.6 years without a clear difference between radiotherapy modalities. Somatotropic and thyrotropic axes were, respectively, the most and least radiosensitive. CONCLUSIONS Current pituitary gland dose constraints may underestimate radiation-induced endocrine deficiencies, thus impairing quality of life. Little difference might be expected between radiation techniques for PG tumors. For non-PG tumors, dose constraints should be applied more systematically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Bouter
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre François Baclesse, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France;
| | - Yves Reznik
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital of Caen, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14033 Caen, France;
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre François Baclesse, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France;
- Corpuscular Physics Laboratory, ENSICAEN, Boulevard Maréchal Juin, 14050 Caen, France
- Unicaen—Normandie Université, 14050 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Soffietti R, Pellerino A, Bruno F, Mauro A, Rudà R. Neurotoxicity from Old and New Radiation Treatments for Brain Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10669. [PMID: 37445846 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Research regarding the mechanisms of brain damage following radiation treatments for brain tumors has increased over the years, thus providing a deeper insight into the pathobiological mechanisms and suggesting new approaches to minimize this damage. This review has discussed the different factors that are known to influence the risk of damage to the brain (mainly cognitive disturbances) from radiation. These include patient and tumor characteristics, the use of whole-brain radiotherapy versus particle therapy (protons, carbon ions), and stereotactic radiotherapy in various modalities. Additionally, biological mechanisms behind neuroprotection have been elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessia Pellerino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mauro
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
- I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Division of Neurology and Neuro-Rehabilitation, San Giuseppe Hospital, 28824 Piancavallo, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Iannalfi A, Riva G, Ciccone L, Orlandi E. The role of particle radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base tumors. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1161752. [PMID: 37350949 PMCID: PMC10283010 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1161752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The skull base is an anatomically and functionally critical area surrounded by vital structures such as the brainstem, the spinal cord, blood vessels, and cranial nerves. Due to this complexity, management of skull base tumors requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a team of specialists such as neurosurgeons, otorhinolaryngologists, radiation oncologists, endocrinologists, and medical oncologists. In the case of pediatric patients, cancer management should be performed by a team of pediatric-trained specialists. Radiation therapy may be used alone or in combination with surgery to treat skull base tumors. There are two main types of radiation therapy: photon therapy and particle therapy. Particle radiotherapy uses charged particles (protons or carbon ions) that, due to their peculiar physical properties, permit precise targeting of the tumor with minimal healthy tissue exposure. These characteristics allow for minimizing the potential long-term effects of radiation exposure in terms of neurocognitive impairments, preserving quality of life, and reducing the risk of radio-induced cancer. For these reasons, in children, adolescents, and young adults, proton therapy should be an elective option when available. In radioresistant tumors such as chordomas and sarcomas and previously irradiated recurrent tumors, particle therapy permits the delivery of high biologically effective doses with low, or however acceptable, toxicity. Carbon ion therapy has peculiar and favorable radiobiological characteristics to overcome radioresistance features. In low-grade tumors, proton therapy should be considered in challenging cases due to tumor volume and involvement of critical neural structures. However, particle radiotherapy is still relatively new, and more research is needed to fully understand its effects. Additionally, the availability of particle therapy is limited as it requires specialized equipment and expertise. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the available literature regarding the role of particle radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base tumors.
Collapse
|
16
|
Tejada Solís S, González Sánchez J, Iglesias Lozano I, Plans Ahicart G, Pérez Núñez A, Meana Carballo L, Gil Salú JL, Fernández Coello A, García Romero JC, Rodríguez de Lope Llorca A, García Duque S, Díez Valle R, Narros Giménez JL, Prat Acín R. Low grade gliomas guide-lines elaborated by the tumor section of Spanish Society of Neurosurgery. NEUROCIRUGIA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2023; 34:139-152. [PMID: 36446721 DOI: 10.1016/j.neucie.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Adult low-grade gliomas (Low Grade Gliomas, LGG) are tumors that originate from the glial cells of the brain and whose management involves great controversy, starting from the diagnosis, to the treatment and subsequent follow-up. For this reason, the Tumor Group of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (GT-SENEC) has held a consensus meeting, in which the most relevant neurosurgical issues have been discussed, reaching recommendations based on the best scientific evidence. In order to obtain the maximum benefit from these treatments, an individualised assessment of each patient should be made by a multidisciplinary team. Experts in each LGG treatment field have briefly described it based in their experience and the reviewed of the literature. Each area has been summarized and focused on the best published evidence. LGG have been surrounded by treatment controversy, although during the last years more accurate data has been published in order to reach treatment consensus. Neurosurgeons must know treatment options, indications and risks to participate actively in the decision making and to offer the best surgical treatment in every case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Tejada Solís
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Josep González Sánchez
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Iglesias Lozano
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gerard Plans Ahicart
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Pérez Núñez
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leonor Meana Carballo
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Centro Médico de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Gil Salú
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Fernández Coello
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos García Romero
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Rodríguez de Lope Llorca
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara García Duque
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Díez Valle
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Narros Giménez
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Prat Acín
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Di Perri D, Jmil S, Lawson TM, Van Calster L, Whenham N, Renard L. Health-related quality of life and cognitive failures in patients with lower-grade gliomas treated with radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:219-224. [PMID: 37080857 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with lower grade (grade 2 and 3) glioma (LGG) frequently experience prolonged clinical course after multimodal therapy (including surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy). There is therefore significant concern about the potential long-term impact of the disease and treatments on quality of life (QOL) and cognitive functioning. In this context, we evaluated health related QOL and cognitive failures in LGG patients previously treated in our RT department. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult LGG patients previously treated with RT were prospectively included. Patients were evaluated based on standardized questionnaires [i.e., EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BN20, and cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ)]. RESULTS Forty-eight patients were included. Median time elapsed since the end of RT was 59.5 months (range: 4-297). Based on EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20, the most prevalent HRQOL issues were impaired cognitive functioning (50% of the patients), impaired emotional functioning (47.9%), financial difficulties (43.7%), fatigue (43.7%), future uncertainty (39.6%), and impaired physical functioning (35.4%). Based on the CFQ, 35.4% of the patients showed increased tendency to cognitive failures. CONCLUSION Patients with LGG frequently experience impairments in HRQOL and cognitive failures after treatment (including RT). Further efforts are therefore warranted to improve the QOL and cognitive outcome of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Di Perri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - S Jmil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - T M Lawson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - L Van Calster
- Department of Neurology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - N Whenham
- Department of Oncology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - L Renard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Flechl B, Konrath L, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, Achtaewa M, Hug EB, Georg P. Preservation of Neurocognition after Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Intracranial Tumors: First Results from REGI-MA-002015. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1102-1114. [PMID: 36372610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton beam radiation therapy reduces dose to healthy brain tissue and thereby decreases the risk of treatment-related decline in neurocognition. Considering the paucity of prospective data, this study aimed to evaluate neurocognitive performance in an adult patient population with intracranial tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2017 and 2021, patients enrolled in the MedAustron registry study and irradiated for intracranial tumors were eligible for neurocognitive assessment. Patients with available 1-year follow-up data were included in the analysis. The test battery consisted of a variety of standardized tests commonly used in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trials. Scores were transformed into z scores to account for demographic effects, and clinically relevant change was defined as a change of ≥1.5 standard deviations. Binary logistic regression analysis and the χ2 test were conducted for clinical parameters and dosimetric hippocampal parameters to evaluate the relationship with overall cognitive decline and changes in memory. RESULTS One hundred twenty-three patients with mostly nonprogressive, extra-axial tumors and neurocognitive assessment at baseline and treatment end as well as 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of proton beam radiation therapy were analyzed. Overall, 7 test scores revealed stability in neurocognitive function with minimal positive changes 1 year after treatment completion (statistically significant in 6 of 7 tests), whereas the majority had no or minimal baseline deficits. At 1-year follow-up, 89.4% of all patients remained stable in their overall cognitive functioning without clinically relevant deterioration in 2 or more tests. None of them showed disease progression. Of the patients, 8.1% presented with radiation-induced brain lesions and exhibited a higher percentage of overall cognitive deterioration without reaching statistical significance. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed higher age at baseline as the only independent parameter to be associated with an overall clinically relevant cognitive decline. There was no significant correlation of hippocampal doses and memory functioning. CONCLUSIONS One year after proton therapy, we observed preservation of cognitive functioning in the vast majority of our patients with intracranial tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Eugen B Hug
- EBG MedAustron GmbH, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Petra Georg
- EBG MedAustron GmbH, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Heggebø LC, Borgen IMH, Rylander H, Kiserud C, Nordenmark TH, Hellebust TP, Evensen ME, Gustavsson M, Ramberg C, Sprauten M, Magelssen H, Blakstad H, Moorthy J, Andersson K, Raunert I, Henry T, Moe C, Granlund C, Goplen D, Brekke J, Johannessen TCA, Solheim TS, Marienhagen K, Humberset Ø, Bergström P, Agrup M, Dahl L, Gubanski M, Gojon H, Brahme CJ, Rydén I, Jakola AS, Vik-Mo EO, Lie HC, Asphaug L, Hervani M, Kristensen I, Rueegg CS, Olsen IC, Ledal RJ, Degsell E, Werlenius K, Blomstrand M, Brandal P. Investigating survival, quality of life and cognition in PROton versus photon therapy for IDH-mutated diffuse grade 2 and 3 GLIOmas (PRO-GLIO): a randomised controlled trial in Norway and Sweden. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070071. [PMID: 36940951 PMCID: PMC10030923 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of proton therapy increases globally despite a lack of randomised controlled trials demonstrating its efficacy and safety. Proton therapy enables sparing of non-neoplastic tissue from radiation. This is principally beneficial and holds promise of reduced long-term side effects. However, the sparing of seemingly non-cancerous tissue is not necessarily positive for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2-3, which have a diffuse growth pattern. With their relatively good prognosis, yet incurable nature, therapy needs to be delicately balanced to achieve a maximal survival benefit combined with an optimised quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS PRO-GLIO (PROton versus photon therapy in IDH-mutated diffuse grade 2 and 3 GLIOmas) is an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase III non-inferiority study. 224 patients aged 18-65 years with IDH-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2-3 from Norway and Sweden will be randomised 1:1 to radiotherapy delivered with protons (experimental arm) or photons (standard arm). First intervention-free survival at 2 years is the primary endpoint. Key secondary endpoints are fatigue and cognitive impairment, both at 2 years. Additional secondary outcomes include several survival measures, health-related quality of life parameters and health economy endpoints. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION To implement proton therapy as part of standard of care for patients with IDH-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2-3, it should be deemed safe. With its randomised controlled design testing proton versus photon therapy, PRO-GLIO will provide important information for this patient population concerning safety, cognition, fatigue and other quality of life parameters. As proton therapy is considerably more costly than its photon counterpart, cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated. PRO-GLIO is approved by ethical committees in Norway (Regional Committee for Medical & Health Research Ethics) and Sweden (The Swedish Ethical Review Authority) and patient inclusion has commenced. Trial results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals, relevant conferences, national and international meetings and expert forums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05190172).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liv Cathrine Heggebø
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ida Maria Henriksen Borgen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Cecilie Kiserud
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tonje Haug Nordenmark
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Taran Paulsen Hellebust
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Morten Egeberg Evensen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Section of Oncology, Drammen Hospital, Drammen, Norway
| | - Magnus Gustavsson
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Radiation Science, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Christina Ramberg
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Sprauten
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Hanne Blakstad
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Janani Moorthy
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ingela Raunert
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas Henry
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Radiation Science, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecilie Moe
- Department of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Carin Granlund
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dorota Goplen
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jorunn Brekke
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim
- Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Øyvind Humberset
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Per Bergström
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Måns Agrup
- Department of Oncology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ludvig Dahl
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Michael Gubanski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helene Gojon
- Department of Radiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Isabelle Rydén
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Asgeir S Jakola
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Einar O Vik-Mo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanne C Lie
- Department of Behavioural Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars Asphaug
- Department of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maziar Hervani
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingrid Kristensen
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Corina Silvia Rueegg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inge C Olsen
- Department of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Katja Werlenius
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Malin Blomstrand
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Petter Brandal
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wang Y, Liu R, Zhang Q, Dong M, Wang D, Chen J, Ou Y, Luo H, Yang K, Wang X. Charged particle therapy for high-grade gliomas in adults: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:29. [PMID: 36755321 PMCID: PMC9906872 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02187-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
High-grade gliomas are the most common intracranial malignancies, and their current prognosis remains poor despite standard aggressive therapy. Charged particle beams have unique physical and biological properties, especially high relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ion beam might improve the clinical treatment outcomes of malignant gliomas. We systematically reviewed the safety, efficacy, and dosimetry of carbon-ion or proton radiotherapy to treat high-grade gliomas. The protocol is detailed in the online PROSPERO database, registration No. CRD42021258495. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases were collected for data analysis on charged particle radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas. Until July 2022, two independent reviewers extracted data based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eleven articles were eligible for further analysis. Overall survival rates were marginally higher in patients with the current standard of care than those receiving concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus temozolomide. The most common side effects of carbon-ion-related therapy were grade 1-2 (such as dermatitis, headache, and alopecia). Long-term toxicities (more than three to six months) usually present as radiation necrosis; however, toxicities higher than grade 3 were not observed. Similarly, dermatitis, headache, and alopecia are among the most common acute side effects of proton therapy treatment. Despite improvement in survival rates, the method of dose-escalation using proton boost is associated with severe brain necrosis which should not be clinically underestimated. Regarding dosimetry, two studies compared proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans. Proton therapy plans aimed to minimize dose exposure to non-target tissues while maintaining target coverage. The use of charged-particle radiotherapy seems to be effective with acceptable adverse effects when used either alone or as a boost. The tendency of survival outcome shows that carbon ion boost is seemingly superior to proton boost. The proton beam could provide good target coverage, and it seems to reduce dose exposure to contralateral organs at risk significantly. This can potentially reduce the treatment-related dose- and volume-related side effects in long-term survivors, such as neurocognitive impairment. High-quality randomized control trials should be conducted in the future. Moreover, Systemic therapeutic options that can be paired with charged particles are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhang Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ruifeng Liu
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Meng Dong
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Dandan Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Junru Chen
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuhong Ou
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hongtao Luo
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Kehu Yang
- grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China. .,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Miller JJ, Gonzalez Castro LN, McBrayer S, Weller M, Cloughesy T, Portnow J, Andronesi O, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Baumert BG, Berger MS, Bi WL, Bindra R, Cahill DP, Chang SM, Costello JF, Horbinski C, Huang RY, Jenkins RB, Ligon KL, Mellinghoff IK, Nabors LB, Platten M, Reardon DA, Shi DD, Schiff D, Wick W, Yan H, von Deimling A, van den Bent M, Kaelin WG, Wen PY. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on diagnosis, management, and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:4-25. [PMID: 36239925 PMCID: PMC9825337 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas are the most common adult, malignant primary brain tumors diagnosed in patients younger than 50, constituting an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been significant progress in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, sparking multiple efforts to improve their diagnosis and treatment. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), the current diagnosis and management of IDH-mutant gliomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies, such as targeted molecular therapies and immunotherapies, will be reviewed. Current challenges and future directions for research will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie J Miller
- Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - L Nicolas Gonzalez Castro
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samuel McBrayer
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, Texas, 75235, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Jana Portnow
- Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ovidiu Andronesi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Informatics and Data Science (IDS), Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology (CBIIT), Trans-Divisional Research Program (TDRP), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brigitta G Baumert
- Cantonal Hospital Graubunden, Institute of Radiation-Oncology, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Mitchell S Berger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ranjit Bindra
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Brain Tumor Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Daniel P Cahill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joseph F Costello
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Craig Horbinski
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Northwestern Medicine Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert B Jenkins
- Individualized Medicine Research, Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Rochester, Minnesota 55901, USA
| | - Keith L Ligon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Department of Neurology, Evnin Family Chair in Neuro-Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - L Burt Nabors
- Department of Neurology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Michael Platten
- CCU Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David A Reardon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Diana D Shi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David Schiff
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Neuro-Oncology at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Program Chair of Neuro-Oncology at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), and Neurology and Chairman at the Neurology Clinic in Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hai Yan
- Genetron Health Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20879, USA
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, and, Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), and, DKTK, INF 224, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Brain Tumour Centre, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William G Kaelin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Proton radiotherapy in the treatment of IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas: an early experience from shanghai proton and heavy ion center. J Neurooncol 2022; 162:503-514. [PMID: 36583815 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04202-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE According to the presence or absence of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, the 2021 WHO classification system bisected diffuse gliomas into IDH-mutant tumors and IDH-wildtype tumors. This study was aimed to evaluate the outcomes of proton radiotherapy treating IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between May 2015 and May 2022, a total of 52 consecutive patients with IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas were treated at Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center. Tumor histologies were 33 cases of astrocytoma and 19 cases of oligodendroglioma. Tumor classified by WHO grade 2, 3 and 4 were 22, 25, and 5 cases, respectively. All 22 patients with WHO grade 2 tumors and one patient with brain stem WHO grade 4 tumor were irradiated with 54GyE. The other 29 patients with WHO grade 3 and 4 tumors were irradiated with 60GyE. Temozolomide was recommended to all patients, and was eventually conducted in 50 patients. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 21.7 months. The 12/24-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for the entire cohort were 97.6%/78.4% and 100%/91.0% group. Examined by both univariate and multivariate analysis, WHO grade of tumor were of the most significant impact for both PFS and OS. No severe acute toxicity (grade 3 or above) was found. In terms of late toxicity, grade 3 radio-necrosis was developed in one case of oligodendroglioma, WHO grade 3. CONCLUSION Proton radiotherapy produced a favorable outcome with acceptable adverse-effects in patients with IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas.
Collapse
|
23
|
Svenjeby C, Carstam L, Werlenius K, Bontell TO, Rydén I, Jacobsson J, Dénes A, Jakola AS, Corell A. Changes in clinical management of diffuse IDH-mutated lower-grade gliomas: patterns of care in a 15-year period. J Neurooncol 2022; 160:535-543. [PMID: 36434487 PMCID: PMC9758083 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04136-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutated diffuse lower-grade gliomas (dLGG) are infiltrating brain tumors and increasing evidence is in favor of early multimodal treatment. In a Scandinavian population-based setting, we wanted to study treatment patterns over the last 15 years, focusing on the short-term postoperative course to better understand the potential negative consequences of treatment. METHODS Patients ≥ 18 years with primary IDH-mutated dLGG grade 2 and 3, operated between January 2007-June 2021 were identified. Patients were divided into subgroups (2007-2011, 2012-2016, and 2017-2021) and comparisons regarding tumor- and disease characteristics, treatment, and postoperative outcome were performed. RESULTS We identified 202 patients (n = 61, 2007-2011; n = 72, 2012-2016; n = 69, 2017-2021), where of 193 underwent resection without change in proportion of resections over time. More patients underwent complete resections in recent times (6.1%; 15.7%; 26.1%, respectively; p = 0.016). Forty-two patients had any neurological deficit postoperatively (14.8%; 23.6%; 23.2%; p = 0.379), mostly minor and transient. Differences in oncological therapy were seen between the investigated subgroups. Early radiotherapy alone (32.8%; 7%; 2.9%; p < 0.001), concomitant chemoradiotherapy (23%; 37.5%; 17.4%; p = 0.022), sequential chemoradiotherapy (0%; 18%; 49.3%; p < 0.001), and no adjuvant treatment (42.6%; 23.6%; 18.8%; p = 0.009) shifted during the studied period. Increasingly more patients received proton radiotherapy compared to photon radiotherapy during the later time periods (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Complete resections were performed more often in later time periods without an apparent increase in surgical morbidity. Early adjuvant oncological treatment shifted towards providing chemotherapy and combined chemoradiotherapy more often in later time periods. Protons replaced photons as the radiation modality of choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Svenjeby
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Louise Carstam
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Katja Werlenius
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas Olsson Bontell
- Department of Physiology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Isabelle Rydén
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Julia Jacobsson
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Dénes
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Asgeir S. Jakola
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Alba Corell
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Berger TR, Wen PY, Lang-Orsini M, Chukwueke UN. World Health Organization 2021 Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors and Implications for Therapy for Adult-Type Gliomas: A Review. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1493-1501. [PMID: 36006639 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Importance Previous histologic classifications of brain tumors have been limited by discrepancies in diagnoses reported by neuropathologists and variability in outcomes and response to therapies. Such diagnostic discrepancies have impaired clinicians' ability to select the most appropriate therapies for patients and have allowed heterogeneous populations of patients to be enrolled in clinical trials, hindering the development of more effective therapies. In adult-type diffuse gliomas, histologic classification has a particularly important effect on clinical care. Observations In 2021, the World Health Organization published the fifth edition of the Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System. This classification incorporates advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of brain tumors with histopathology in order to group tumors into more biologically and molecularly defined entities. As such, tumor classification is significantly improved through better characterized natural histories. These changes have particularly important implications for gliomas. For the first time, adult- and pediatric-type gliomas are classified separately on the basis of differences in molecular pathogenesis and prognosis. Furthermore, the previous broad category of adult-type diffuse gliomas has been consolidated into 3 types: astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant; oligodendroglioma, IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted; and glioblastoma, IDH wild type. These major changes are driven by IDH mutation status and include the restriction of the diagnosis of glioblastoma to tumors that are IDH wild type; the reclassification of tumors previously diagnosed as IDH-mutated glioblastomas as astrocytomas IDH mutated, grade 4; and the requirement for the presence of IDH mutations to classify tumors as astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas. Conclusions and Relevance The 2021 World Health Organization central nervous system tumor classification is a major advance toward improving the diagnosis of brain tumors. It will provide clinicians with more accurate guidance on prognosis and optimal therapy for patients and ensure that more homogenous patient populations are enrolled in clinical trials, potentially facilitating the development of more effective therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar R Berger
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Melanie Lang-Orsini
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Ugonma N Chukwueke
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Halasz LM, Attia A, Bradfield L, Brat DJ, Kirkpatrick JP, Laack NN, Lalani N, Lebow ES, Liu AK, Niemeier HM, Palmer JD, Peters KB, Sheehan J, Thomas RP, Vora SA, Wahl DR, Weiss SE, Yeboa DN, Zhong J, Shih HA. Radiation Therapy for IDH-Mutant Grade 2 and Grade 3 Diffuse Glioma: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:370-386. [PMID: 35902341 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for adults with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma, as classified in the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours. It includes indications for radiation therapy (RT), advanced RT techniques, and clinical management of adverse effects. METHODS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a multidisciplinary task force to address 4 key questions focused on the RT management of patients with IDH-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS A strong recommendation for close surveillance alone was made for patients with oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, 1p/19q codeleted, WHO grade 2 after gross total resection without high-risk features. For oligodendroglioma, WHO grade 2 with any high-risk features, adjuvant RT was conditionally recommended. However, adjuvant RT was strongly recommended for oligodendroglioma, WHO grade 3. A conditional recommendation for close surveillance alone was made for astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, WHO grade 2 after gross total resection without high-risk features. Adjuvant RT was conditionally recommended for astrocytoma, WHO grade 2, with any high-risk features and strongly recommended for astrocytoma, WHO grade 3. Dose recommendations varied based on histology and grade. Given known adverse long-term effects of RT, consideration for advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy/volumetric modulated arc therapy or proton therapy were given as strong and conditional recommendations, respectively. Finally, based on expert opinion, the guideline recommends assessment, surveillance, and management for toxicity management. CONCLUSIONS Based on published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed recommendations to inform the management of adults with IDH-mutant grade 2 and grade 3 diffuse glioma as defined by WHO 2021 classification, based on the highest quality published data, and best translated by our task force of subject matter experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Albert Attia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bon Secours Mercy Health, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Daniel J Brat
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nafisha Lalani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Emily S Lebow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Arthur K Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UC Health, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | | | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Reena P Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Sujay A Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Daniel R Wahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Stephanie E Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - D Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD-Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jim Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kirkman MA, Hunn BHM, Thomas MSC, Tolmie AK. Influences on cognitive outcomes in adult patients with gliomas: A systematic review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:943600. [PMID: 36033458 PMCID: PMC9407441 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.943600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
People with brain tumors, including those previously treated, are commonly affected by a range of neurocognitive impairments involving executive function, memory, attention, and social/emotional functioning. Several factors are postulated to underlie this relationship, but evidence relating to many of these factors is conflicting and does not fully explain the variation in cognitive outcomes seen in the literature and in clinical practice. To address this, we performed a systematic literature review to identify and describe the range of factors that can influence cognitive outcomes in adult patients with gliomas. A literature search was performed of Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and PsycTESTS from commencement until September 2021. Of 9,998 articles identified through the search strategy, and an additional 39 articles identified through other sources, 142 were included in our review. The results confirmed that multiple factors influence cognitive outcomes in patients with gliomas. The effects of tumor characteristics (including location) and treatments administered are some of the most studied variables but the evidence for these is conflicting, which may be the result of methodological and study population differences. Tumor location and laterality overall appear to influence cognitive outcomes, and detection of such an effect is contingent upon administration of appropriate cognitive tests. Surgery appears to have an overall initial deleterious effect on cognition with a recovery in most cases over several months. A large body of evidence supports the adverse effects of radiotherapy on cognition, but the role of chemotherapy is less clear. To contrast, baseline cognitive status appears to be a consistent factor that influences cognitive outcomes, with worse baseline cognition at diagnosis/pre-treatment correlated with worse long-term outcomes. Similarly, much evidence indicates that anti-epileptic drugs have a negative effect on cognition and genetics also appear to have a role. Evidence regarding the effect of age on cognitive outcomes in glioma patients is conflicting, and there is insufficient evidence for gender and fatigue. Cognitive reserve, brain reserve, socioeconomic status, and several other variables discussed in this review, and their influence on cognition and recovery, have not been well-studied in the context of gliomas and are areas for focus in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A. Kirkman
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, University College London (UCL) Institute of Education, UCL, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Matthew A. Kirkman,
| | - Benjamin H. M. Hunn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Michael S. C. Thomas
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew K. Tolmie
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, University College London (UCL) Institute of Education, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dinkel JG, Lahmer G, Mennecke A, Hock SW, Richter-Schmidinger T, Fietkau R, Distel L, Putz F, Dörfler A, Schmidt MA. Effects of Hippocampal Sparing Radiotherapy on Brain Microstructure-A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Analysis. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12070879. [PMID: 35884686 PMCID: PMC9312994 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12070879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy (HSR) is a promising approach to alleviate cognitive side effects following cranial radiotherapy. Microstructural brain changes after irradiation have been demonstrated using Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI). However, evidence is conflicting for certain parameters and anatomic structures. This study examines the effects of radiation on white matter and hippocampal microstructure using DTI and evaluates whether these may be mitigated using HSR. A total of 35 tumor patients undergoing a prospective randomized controlled trial receiving either conventional or HSR underwent DTI before as well as 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 (±3) months after radiotherapy. Fractional Anisotropy (FA), Mean Diffusivity (MD), Axial Diffusivity (AD), and Radial Diffusivity (RD) were measured in the hippocampus (CA), temporal, and frontal lobe white matter (TL, FL), and corpus callosum (CC). Longitudinal analysis was performed using linear mixed models. Analysis of the entire patient collective demonstrated an overall FACC decrease and RDCC increase compared to baseline in all follow-ups; ADCC decreased after 6 months, and MDCC increased after 12 months (p ≤ 0.001, 0.001, 0.007, 0.018). ADTL decreased after 24 and 30 months (p ≤ 0.004, 0.009). Hippocampal FA increased after 6 and 12 months, driven by a distinct increase in ADCA and MDCA, with RDCA not increasing until 30 months after radiotherapy (p ≤ 0.011, 0.039, 0.005, 0.040, 0.019). Mean radiation dose correlated positively with hippocampal FA (p < 0.001). These findings may indicate complex pathophysiological changes in cerebral microstructures after radiation, insufficiently explained by conventional DTI models. Hippocampal microstructure differed between patients undergoing HSR and conventional cranial radiotherapy after 6 months with a higher ADCA in the HSR subgroup (p ≤ 0.034).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes G. Dinkel
- Neuroradiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.G.D.); (A.M.); (S.W.H.); (A.D.)
| | - Godehard Lahmer
- Strahlenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (G.L.); (R.F.); (L.D.); (F.P.)
| | - Angelika Mennecke
- Neuroradiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.G.D.); (A.M.); (S.W.H.); (A.D.)
| | - Stefan W. Hock
- Neuroradiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.G.D.); (A.M.); (S.W.H.); (A.D.)
| | - Tanja Richter-Schmidinger
- Psychiatrische und Psychotherapeutische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Strahlenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (G.L.); (R.F.); (L.D.); (F.P.)
| | - Luitpold Distel
- Strahlenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (G.L.); (R.F.); (L.D.); (F.P.)
| | - Florian Putz
- Strahlenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (G.L.); (R.F.); (L.D.); (F.P.)
| | - Arnd Dörfler
- Neuroradiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.G.D.); (A.M.); (S.W.H.); (A.D.)
| | - Manuel A. Schmidt
- Neuroradiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.G.D.); (A.M.); (S.W.H.); (A.D.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jacob J, Feuvret L, Simon JM, Ribeiro M, Nichelli L, Jenny C, Ricard D, Psimaras D, Hoang-Xuan K, Maingon P. Neurological side effects of radiation therapy. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:2363-2374. [DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-05944-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
29
|
Tom MC, Milano MT, Chao ST, Soltys SG, Knisely JP, Sahgal A, Nagpal S, Lo SS, Jabbari S, Wang TJ, Ahluwalia MS, Simonson M, Palmer JD, Gephart MH, Halasz LM, Garg AK, Chiang VL, Chang EL. Executive summary of american radium society’s appropriate use criteria for the postoperative management of lower grade gliomas. Radiother Oncol 2022; 170:79-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
30
|
Frances SM, Velikova G, Klein M, Short SC, Murray L, Wright JM, Boele F. Long-term impact of adult WHO grade II or III gliomas on health-related quality of life: A systematic review. Neurooncol Pract 2021; 9:3-17. [PMID: 35087674 PMCID: PMC8789291 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioma diagnosis can be devastating and result in a range of symptoms. Relatively little is known about the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) challenges faced by these patients. Establishing the impact of diagnosis on HRQOL could help positively tailor clinical decision making regarding patient support and treatment. The aim of this review is to identify the long-term HRQOL issues reported at least 2 years following diagnosis of WHO grade II/III glioma. Method Systematic literature searches were carried out using Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection. Searches were designed to identify patient self-reports on HRQOL aspects defined as physical, mental, or social issues. Quality assessment was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Narrative synthesis was used to collate findings. Results The search returned 8923 articles. Two hundred seventy-eight titles remained after title and abstract screening, with 21 full-text articles included in the final analysis. The majority of studies used quantitative methods, with 3 articles reporting mixed methodology. Negative emotional/psychological/cognitive changes were the most commonly reported. Physical complaints included fatigue, seizures, and restricted daily activity. Social challenges included strained social relationships and financial problems. Patient coping strategies were suggested to influence patient’s survival quality. Conclusion The consequences of a glioma diagnosis and treatment can have substantial implications for patients’ long-term HRQOL and daily functioning. Findings from this review lay the groundwork for efforts to improve patient HRQOL in long-term survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sé Maria Frances
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, St James’s University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, St James’s University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Molecular Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Martin Klein
- Department of Medical Psychology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susan C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, St James’s University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Molecular Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Louise Murray
- Leeds Institute of Molecular Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Judy M Wright
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Florien Boele
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, St James’s University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Haldbo-Classen L, Amidi A, Wu LM, Lukacova S, Oettingen G, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Zachariae R, Kallehauge JF, Høyer M. Associations between patient-reported outcomes and radiation dose in patients treated with radiation therapy for primary brain tumours. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:86-92. [PMID: 34693039 PMCID: PMC8515293 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Higher radiation doses to the brain may negatively affect quality of life. Higher radiation doses to the brain may negatively affect patient-reported cognition. Patients with fatigue had received higher dose to certain areas in the brain.
Aim This study aimed to explore associations between radiation dose and patient-reported outcomes in patients with a primary non-glioblastoma brain tumour treated with radiation therapy (RT), with a focus on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and self-reported cognitive function. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 78 patients who had received RT for a non-glioblastoma primary brain tumour, underwent neuropsychological testing and completed questionnaires on HRQoL, cognitive function, fatigue, depression, anxiety and perceived stress. The study explores the association between HRQoL scores, self-reported cognitive function and radiation doses to total brain, brainstem, hippocampus, thalamus, temporal lobes and frontal lobes. In addition, we examined correlations between neuropsychological test scores and self-reported cognitive function. Results The median time between RT and testing was 4.6 years (range 1–9 years). Patients who had received high mean radiation doses to the total brain had low HRQoL scores (Cohen’s d = 0.50, p = 0.04), brainstem (d = 0.65, p = 0.01) and hippocampus (d = 0.66, p = 0.01). High mean doses to the total brain were also associated with low scores on self-reported cognitive functioning (Cohen’s d = 0.64, p = 0.02), brainstem (d = 0.55, p = 0.03), hippocampus (d = 0.76, p < 0.01), temporal lobes (d = 0.70, p < 0.01) and thalamus (d = 0.64, p = 0.01). Self-reported cognitive function correlated well with neuropsychological test scores (correlation range 0.27–0.54.) Conclusions High radiation doses to specific brain structures may be associated with impaired HRQoL and self-reported cognitive function with potentially negative implications to patients’ daily lives. Patient-reported outcomes of treatment-related side-effects and their associations with radiation doses to the brain and its sub-structures may provide important information on radiation tolerance to the brain and sub-structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Haldbo-Classen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - A Amidi
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Unit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - L M Wu
- Unit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark.,Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - S Lukacova
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - G Oettingen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Y Lassen-Ramshad
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - R Zachariae
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Unit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - J F Kallehauge
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M Høyer
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Background: Gliomas are primary cerebral tumors. Radiation therapy plays a key role in their treatment but with a risk of toxicity associated with the dose to and volume of normal tissue that is irradiated. With its precision properties allowing for the increased sparing of healthy tissue, proton therapy could be an interesting option for this pathology. Methods: Two reviewers performed a systematic review of original papers published between 2010 and July 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. We analyzed disease outcomes, toxicity outcomes, or dosimetry data in four separate groups: children/adults and individuals with low-/high-grade gliomas. Results: Among 15 studies, 11 concerned clinical and toxicity outcomes, and 4 reported dosimetry data. Proton therapy showed similar disease outcomes with greater tolerance than conventional radiation therapy, partly due to the better dosimetry plans. Conclusions: This review suggests that proton therapy is a promising technique for glioma treatment. However, studies with a high level of evidence are still needed to validate this finding.
Collapse
|
33
|
Young Adult Populations Face Yet Another Barrier to Care With Insurers: Limited Access to Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1496-1504. [PMID: 33677051 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Young patients, including pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (YA) patients, are most likely to benefit from the reduced integral dose of proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) resulting in fewer late toxicities and secondary malignancies. This study sought to examine insurance approval and appeal outcomes for PBT among YA patients compared with pediatric patients at a large-volume proton therapy center. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a cross-sectional cohort study of 284 consecutive patients aged 0 to 39 years for whom PBT was recommended in 2018 through 2019. Pediatric patients were defined as aged 0 to 18 years and YA patients 19 to 39 years. Rates of approval, denials, and decision timelines were calculated. Tumor type and location were also evaluated as factors that may influence insurance decisions. RESULTS A total of 207 patients (73%) were approved for PBT at initial request. YA patients (n = 68/143, 48%) were significantly less likely to receive initial approval compared with pediatric patients (n = 139/141; 99%) (P < .001). Even after 47% (n = 35 of 75) of the PBT denials for YA patients were overturned, YAs had a significantly lower final PBT approval (72% vs pediatric 99%; P < .001). The median wait time was also significantly longer for YA patients (median, 8 days; interquartile range [IQR] 3-17 vs median, 2 days; IQR, 0-6; P < .001). In those patients requiring an appeal, the median wait time was 16 days (IQR, 9-25). CONCLUSION Given the decades of survivorship of YA patients, PBT is an important tool to reduce late toxicities and secondary malignancies. Compared with pediatric patients, YA patients are significantly less likely to receive insurance approval for PBT. Insurance denials and subsequent appeal requests result in significant delays for YA patients. Insurers need to re-examine their policies to include expedited decisions and appeals and removal of arbitrary age cutoffs so that YA patients can gain easier access to PBT. Furthermore, consensus guidelines encouraging greater PBT access for YA may be warranted from both medical societies and/or AYA experts.
Collapse
|
34
|
Kim KS, Wu HG. Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy? Cancer Res Treat 2021; 53:621-634. [PMID: 34176253 PMCID: PMC8291184 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Charged-particle therapy (CPT) such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) exhibit substantial physical and biological advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy. As it can reduce the amount of radiation irradiated in the normal organ, CPT has been mainly applied to pediatric cancer and radioresistent tumors in the eloquent area. Although there is a possibility of greater benefits, high set-up cost and dearth of high level of clinical evidence hinder wide applications of CPT. This review aims to present recent clinical results of PBT and CIRT in selected diseases focusing on possible indications of CPT. We also discussed how clinical studies are conducted to increase the number of patients who can benefit from CPT despite its high cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hong-Gyun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul,
Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
[New indications of protontherapy for adults intracranial tumours]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:545-549. [PMID: 34175224 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Considering intracranial tumours, only few indications of protontherapy, such as chordoma, chondrosarcoma or uveal melanoma, are uniformly approved in the world. Other indications, excluding paediatric pathologies, are still debated. The aim of this article is to describe the rationale for the use of protonbeam irradiation for meningioma, pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, paraganglioma, glioma, and schwannoma, and to inform the radiation oncologists if prospective studies or randomized studies are opened for inclusions. This article deals only with indications for adults.
Collapse
|
36
|
Low-Grade Glioma Case Series: Lessons Learned from an Evolving 10-Year Single-Institution Multidisciplinary Team Practice. World Neurosurg 2021; 151:e47-e57. [PMID: 33781942 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-grade gliomas are a heterogeneous group with significant changes in their management during the last decade. OBJECTIVE To assess how our multidisciplinary team approach to the management of low-grade glioma has evolved over the past 10 years and its implications for outcomes. METHODS Retrospective single-center cohort study of adult patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of World Health Organization grade II glioma between 2009 and 2018. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic data were collected. RESULTS Ninety-five patients were included. There was a statistically significant difference in the surgical approach, with more patients having gross total resection (45.7% vs. 18.4%) and fewer patients having a biopsy (21.8% vs. 49.0%) (P = 0.002) after 2014. There was a significantly better overall survival after 2014 (<2014, 16.3%; ≥2014, 0 deaths; P = 0.010) measured at the mean time of follow-up. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.045) and radiotherapy (P = 0.001) significantly decreased after 2014. A subgroup analysis showed that the impact of extent of surgical resection was the greatest for survival in the 1p19q noncodeleted tumors (P = 0.029) and for seizure outcomes in the 1p19q codeleted group (P = 0.018). There was no statistically significant increase in neurologic disability with more radical surgery, incorporating intraoperative neuromonitoring, as measured by modified Rankin Scale score (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS More radical surgery was associated with increased survival, less need for postoperative adjuvant therapy and better seizure control, without significant morbidity. Molecular markers are useful tools for stratification of benefits after such surgery.
Collapse
|
37
|
Bauer J, Bahn E, Harrabi S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Alber M. How can scanned proton beam treatment planning for low-grade glioma cope with increased distal RBE and locally increased radiosensitivity for late MR-detected brain lesions? Med Phys 2021; 48:1497-1507. [PMID: 33506555 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
A novel risk model has recently been proposed for the occurrence of late contrast-enhancing brain lesions (CEBLs) after proton irradiation of low-grade glioma (LGG) patients. It predicts a strong dependence on dose-weighted linear-energy transfer (LETd effect) and an increased radiosensitivity of the ventricular proximity, a 4-mm fringe surrounding the ventricular system (VP4mm effect). On this basis, we investigated (A) how these two risk factors and patient-specific anatomical and treatment plan (TP) features contribute to normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and (B) if conventional LETd -reduction techniques like multiple-field TP are able to reduce NTCP. (A) The LGG model cohort (N = 110) was stratified with respect to prescribed dose, tumor grade, and treatment field configuration. NTCP predictions and CEBL occurrence rates per strata were analyzed. (B) The effect of multiple-field TP was investigated in two patient groups: (i) nine high-risk subjects with extended lateral target volumes who had developed CEBLs after single-beam treatments were retrospectively replanned with a clinical standard two-field setting using almost orthogonal fields and strictly opposing fields, (ii) single-field treatments were simulated for seven low-risk patients with small central target volumes clinically treated with two strictly opposing fields. (A) In the model cohort, we identified the exposure of the radiosensitive VP4mm fringe with proton field components of increased biological effectiveness as dominant NTCP driving factor. We observed that larger target volumes and location lateral to the main ventricles, both being characteristic for WHO°II tumors, presented with the highest complication risks. Among subjects of an equal dose prescription of 54 Gy(RBE), the highest median NTCP was obtained for the WHO°II group treated with two fields using sharp angles. (B) Regarding the effect of multiple-field plans, we found that an NTCP reduction was only achievable in the low-risk group where the LETd effect dominates and the VP4mm effect is small. NTCP of the single-field plans was 23% higher compared to the clinical opposing field plan. In the high-risk group, where the VP4mm effect dominates the risk, both two-field scenarios yielded 44% higher NTCP predictions compared to the clinical single-field plans. The interplay of an increased radiosensitivity in the VP4mm fringe with proton field components of increased biological effectiveness creates a geometric complexity that can hardly be managed by current clinical TP. Our results underline that advanced biologically guided TP approaches become crucial for an effective risk minimization in proton therapy of LGG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Bauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Emanuel Bahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Alber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kamson D, Tsien C. Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography in the RT Planning and Assessment of Response of Malignant Gliomas. Mol Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-816386-3.00078-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
39
|
Zhang Y, Wang J. Research progress on radiotherapy technology and dose fraction scheme for advanced gliomas. Transl Cancer Res 2020; 9:7642-7651. [PMID: 35117363 PMCID: PMC8799171 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-20-1891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Glioma is the most common central malignant tumor. High-grade glioma (HGG) has high malignancy and a short median survival. Complete surgical resection and comprehensive treatment with postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the recommended treatment for HGGs at present in clinic. Postoperative radiotherapy can reduce the local recurrence rate and prolong the survival time of patients. In recent years, researchers have made some progress on different radiotherapy technologies and dose fraction schemes. With the continuous development of medical technology, different groups of people should choose different dose fraction schemes, in order to realize the individualization of treatment schemes, and provide more benefits to patients. At present, the optimal radiotherapy dose, the fraction model, and how to achieve individualized radiotherapy remains unclear. In view of the poor prognosis of this disease, patients should be encouraged to participate in properly conducted experimental studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Junjie Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
van der Weide HL, Kramer MCA, Scandurra D, Eekers DBP, Klaver YLB, Wiggenraad RGJ, Méndez Romero A, Coremans IEM, Boersma L, van Vulpen M, Langendijk JA. Proton therapy for selected low grade glioma patients in the Netherlands. Radiother Oncol 2020; 154:283-290. [PMID: 33197495 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Proton therapy offers an attractive alternative to conventional photon-based radiotherapy in low grade glioma patients, delivering radiotherapy with equivalent efficacy to the tumour with less radiation exposure to the brain. In the Netherlands, patients with favourable prognosis based on tumour and patient characteristics can be offered proton therapy. Radiation-induced neurocognitive function decline is a major concern in these long surviving patients. Although level 1 evidence of superior clinical outcome with proton therapy is lacking, the Dutch National Health Care Institute concluded that there is scientific evidence to assume that proton therapy can have clinical benefit by reducing radiation-induced brain damage. Based on this decision, proton therapy is standard insured care for selected low grade glioma patients. Patients with other intracranial tumours can also qualify for proton therapy, based on the same criteria. In this paper, the evidence and considerations that led to this decision are summarised. Additionally, the eligibility criteria for proton therapy and the steps taken to obtain high-quality data on treatment outcome are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiska L van der Weide
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands.
| | - Miranda C A Kramer
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel Scandurra
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle B P Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ida E M Coremans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, the Netherlands
| | - Marco van Vulpen
- Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Traunwieser T, Kandels D, Pauls F, Pietsch T, Warmuth-Metz M, Bison B, Krauss J, Kortmann RD, Timmermann B, Thomale UW, Luettich P, Neumann-Holbeck A, Tischler T, Hernáiz Driever P, Witt O, Gnekow AK. Long-term cognitive deficits in pediatric low-grade glioma (LGG) survivors reflect pretreatment conditions-report from the German LGG studies. Neurooncol Adv 2020; 2:vdaa094. [PMID: 32968720 PMCID: PMC7497816 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Disease and treatment contribute to cognitive late effects following pediatric low-grade glioma (LGG). We analyzed prospectively collected neuropsychological data of German pediatric LGG survivors and focused on the impact of hydrocephalus at diagnosis, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) status, and extent of surgery. Methods We used the Neuropsychological Basic Diagnostic screening tool based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model for intelligence and the concept of cross-battery assessment at 2 and 5 years from diagnosis for 316 patients from the German pediatric LGG study and LGG registry (7.1 years median age; 45 NF1; cerebral hemispheres 16%, supratentorial midline 39%, infratentorial 45%). Hydrocephalus was classified radiologically in 137 non-NF1 patients with infratentorial tumors (95/137 complete/subtotal resection). Results Patients with NF1 versus non-NF1 exhibited inferior verbal short-term memory and visual processing (P < .001-.021). In non-NF1 patients, infratentorial tumor site and complete/subtotal resection were associated with sequelae in visual processing, psychomotor speed, and processing speed (P < .001-.008). Non-NF1 patients without surgical tumor reduction and/or nonsurgical treatment experienced similar deficits. Degree of hydrocephalus at diagnosis had no further impact. Psychomotor and processing speed were impaired comparably following chemo-/radiotherapy (P < .001-.021). Pretreatment factors such as NF1 or tumor site were relevant at multivariate analysis. Conclusions All pediatric LGG survivors are at risk to experience long-term cognitive impairments in various domains. Even surgical only management of cerebellar LGG or no treatment at all, that is, biopsy only/radiological diagnosis did not protect cognitive function. Since pattern and extent of deficits are crucial to tailor rehabilitation, neuropsychological and quality of survival assessments should be mandatory in future LGG trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Traunwieser
- Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Daniela Kandels
- Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Franz Pauls
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- Institute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Monika Warmuth-Metz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Brigitte Bison
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Juergen Krauss
- Section of Pediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| | | | - Peggy Luettich
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Tischler
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pablo Hernáiz Driever
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Olaf Witt
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Astrid K Gnekow
- Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Schaub L, Harrabi SB, Debus J. Particle therapy in the future of precision therapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200183. [PMID: 32795176 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The first hospital-based treatment facilities for particle therapy started operation about thirty years ago. Since then, the clinical experience with protons and carbon ions has grown continuously and more than 200,000 patients have been treated to date. The promising clinical results led to a rapidly increasing number of treatment facilities and many new facilities are planned or under construction all over the world. An inverted depth-dose profile combined with potential radiobiological advantages make charged particles a precious tool for the treatment of tumours that are particularly radioresistant or located nearby sensitive structures. A rising number of trials have already confirmed the benefits of particle therapy in selected clinical situations and further improvements in beam delivery, image guidance and treatment planning are expected. This review summarises some physical and biological characteristics of accelerated charged particles and gives some examples of their clinical application. Furthermore, challenges and future perspectives of particle therapy will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Haldbo-Classen L, Amidi A, Lukacova S, Wu LM, Oettingen GV, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Zachariae R, Kallehauge JF, Høyer M. Cognitive impairment following radiation to hippocampus and other brain structures in adults with primary brain tumours. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:1-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
44
|
Jacob J, Clausse E, Benadjaoud M, Jenny C, Ribeiro M, Feuvret L, Mazeron JJ, Antoni D, Bernier MO, Hoang-Xuan K, Psimaras D, Carpentier A, Ricard D, Maingon P. Dose distribution of the brain tissue associated with cognitive functions in high-grade glioma patients. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:1-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
45
|
Lim SH, Li CH, Jeong YI, Jang WY, Choi JM, Jung S. Enhancing Radiotherapeutic Effect With Nanoparticle-Mediated Radiosensitizer Delivery Guided By Focused Gamma Rays In Lewis Lung Carcinoma-Bearing Mouse Brain Tumor Models. Int J Nanomedicine 2019; 14:8861-8874. [PMID: 32009784 PMCID: PMC6859088 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s227894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Targeting radiosensitizer-incorporated nanoparticles to a tumor could allow for less normal tissue toxicity with more efficient drug release, thus improving the efficacy and safety of radiation treatment. The aim of this study was to improve tumor-specific delivery and bioavailability of a nanoparticle-mediated radiosensitizer in mouse brain tumor models. Methods A pH-sensitive nanoparticle, chitoPEGAcHIS, was conjugated to recombinant peptide HVGGSSV that could bind to tax-interaction protein 1 (TIP-1) as a radiation-inducible receptor. Then the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) inhibitor, SP600125 was incorporated into this copolymer to fabricate a HVGGSSV-chitoPEGAcHIS-SP600125 (HVSP-NP) nanoradiosensitizer. In vitro and in vivo radiation treatment were performed using a Gamma Knife unit. The tumor targetability of HVSP-NP was estimated by optical bioluminescence. Synergistic therapeutic effects of radiation treatment and HVSP-NP were investigated in Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cell-bearing mouse brain tumor models. Results The SP600125 JNK inhibitor effectively reduced DNA damage repair to irradiated LLC cells. A pH sensitivity assay indicated that HVSP-NP swelled at acidic pH and increased in diameter, and its release rate gradually increased. Optical bioluminescence assay showed that radiation induced TIP-1 expression in mouse brain tumor and that the nanoradiosensitizer selectively targeted irradiated tumors. Radiation treatment with HVSP-NP induced greater apoptosis and significantly inhibited tumor growth compared to radiation alone. Conclusion As a novel nanoradiosensitizer, HVSP-NP was found to be able to selectively target irradiated tumors and significantly increase tumor growth delay in LLC-bearing mouse brain tumor models. This research shows that delivering a pH-sensitive nanoradiosensitizer to a brain tumor in which TIP-1 is induced by radiation can result in improved radiosensitizer-release in an acidic microenvironment of tumor tissue and in created synergistic effects in radiation treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sa-Hoe Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.,Brain Tumor Research Laboratory, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Chun-Hao Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin 133000, People's Republic of China
| | - Young-Il Jeong
- Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan 602-739, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo-Youl Jang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.,Brain Tumor Research Laboratory, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Jin-Myung Choi
- Brain Tumor Research Laboratory, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Shin Jung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.,Brain Tumor Research Laboratory, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea
| |
Collapse
|