GEC-ESTRO/ACROP recommendations for quality assurance of ultrasound imaging in brachytherapy

All-Ireland evaluation of ultrasound systems for prostate brachytherapy: Application specific quality control protocol and quality assurance phantoms

CONTEXT

The goal of quality assurance (QA) for transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate brachytherapy is to ensure optimum patient outcomes by providing a high-quality service using equipment that is operating at optimum performance levels. There are specific recommendations from professional organisations that outline the QA parameters that need to be considered specifically for ultrasound guided prostate brachytherapy. However, these recommendations are heavily based on the guidance made for the general application of ultrasound to all relevant clinical applications. Additionally, there is a lack of consensus on the optimum QA test device to conduct the schedule of testing for this specific application of TRUS image guided interventional procedures.

PROCEDURES

In this study, we describe a task-specific testing schedule for TRUS QA, detailing the QA test protocol, and the recommended equipment set-up, and scan parameters to evaluate these systems. Also described are the commercially available test devices, as well as custom made devices including the design and acoustic characteristics of the materials used to design the custom devices. This QA test protocol was used to evaluate nine TRUS systems used on the island of Ireland in prostate brachytherapy treatment.

MAIN FINDINGS

The evaluation revealed significant differences among the nine TRUS scanners, highlighting variations in manufacturer pre-sets and their potential limitations in effectively guiding prostate brachytherapy.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the urgent need for application specific QA test devices for TRUS systems used to guide prostate brachytherapy, and the need for the optimization of scanning parameters during these procedures.

Reconstruction errors in clinical intraoperative TRUS-based prostate HDR-BT detected using electromagnetic tracking

PURPOSE

To investigate the occurrence of errors in transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based implant reconstructions for high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in prostate cancer using an afterloader-integrated electromagnetic tracking (EMT) system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients were treated with one TRUS-based treatment fraction in an intraoperative setting while under general anesthesia, as part of their prostate HDR-BT (2×13.5 Gy) treatment. EMT measurements were performed before the start of the treatment in all implanted needles at dwell positions (DPs) with an interval of 5 mm. The Euclidean distances (EDs) between clinically reconstructed and EMT-measured DPs after registration were calculated. Errors were evaluated per needle (minimum ED of 2mm) and stratified into 4 severity levels (minor, moderate, major and severe). Error causes were investigated through retrospective inspection of TRUS imaging.

RESULTS

The median (range) ED between EMT-measured and clinically reconstructed DPs was 1.0 (0.1-9.4) mm. Higher EDs were observed in the anterior and lateral regions of the prostate. From 265 evaluated needle reconstructions, 23% (61/265) had minor errors or higher, while 9% (24/265) had major or severe errors. Severe errors were mostly caused by incorrect needle or depth selection. Major, moderate and minor errors were mostly caused by artifact, shadowing, and user errors, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that a quarter of needle reconstructions contained errors >2mm, and that high and severe errors were not uncommon. EMT can play an important role in detecting and preventing these reconstruction errors without disrupting the clinical workflow.

Assessment of integrated electromagnetic tracking for dwell position monitoring in a clinical HDR brachytherapy setting for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Electromagnetic Tracking (EMT) technology has been integrated in a prototype high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) afterloading device. Its potential for dwell position (DP) monitoring has earlier been demonstrated in prostate phantoms. However, its performance for prostate BT in the clinical setting remains to be assessed.

AIM

Assess the reliability and value of EMT measurements in transrectal ultrasound-based (TRUS-based) and computed tomography-based (CT-based) prostate HDR-BT.

METHODS

EMT measurements were conducted on 20 patients undergoing dual-fraction prostate HDR-BT monotherapy. In each treatment fraction an individual TRUS-based or CT-based treatment plan was generated. The measurements were compared to DPs of manually reconstructed needles in those TRUS-based or CT-based treatment plans. An internal reference sensor was also placed in one needle to assess internal movement levels and its potential for movement correction.

RESULTS

For TRUS-based treatments, median Euclidean distances (ED) of 1.00 mm were observed between EMT measurements and manual DP determination. Reference sensor movement was minimal at a median of 0.18 mm. For DPs measured in the CT-room and treatment room, median EDs of 1.60 mm and 2.24 mm compared to CT-based DP determination respectively were observed, indicating the system's ability to detect changes in implant geometry over time and after patient repositioning. Median reference sensor movement of 0.97 mm was observed. Implementing reference sensor-based movement correction led to a significant but small decrease in ED for CT-based treatments.

CONCLUSION

EMT is suitable for TRUS-based prostate HDR-BT quality assurance and error detection. While EMT can identify changes in implant geometry in CT-based prostate HDR-BT treatments, it showed lower accuracy in this setting.

Proof-of-concept of real-time electromagnetic guidance for gynecologic interstitial catheters in high dose rate brachytherapy

Background and Purpose

The addition of interstitial needles to intracavitary gynecologic (GYN) high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy has been shown to improve target coverage and organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing. However, no commercial solution allows real-time guidance of interstitial catheter placement. This phantom study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an electromagnetic (EM) tracking system guidance workflow for GYN HDR brachytherapy treatment in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and real-time transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion scenario.

Materials and Methods

A clinical investigational system combining a treatment planning system and the EM tracking technology was used. The 3D T2 weighted magnetic resonance (MR) image set of a patient treated with intracavitary and interstitial HDR brachytherapy was retrospectively chosen. The MR image set was used to delineate the target and the OARs. A preplan was generated to determine needles positions in advance. The implant was reproduced in a water phantom. A 3D TRUS scan was acquired, and a rigid registration between the MR and the TRUS images was performed.

Results

The accuracy of the EM tracking system was < 1 mm for both the sagittal and the transverse modes of the TRUS probe. Contours that were delineated on the MRI were propagated on the TRUS images after the rigid registration. Needle insertion was successfully guided in real time with the EM tracking system on the TRUS live image using the MRI contours for guidance.

Conclusion

Based on this proof-of-concept, real-time EM-guidance of interstitial needle for GYN HDR brachytherapy appears to be feasible.

Transrectal ultrasound for intraoperative interstitial needle guidance in cervical cancer brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to prospectively assess the visibility of interstitial needles on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in cervical cancer brachytherapy patients and evaluate its impact on implant and treatment plan quality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

TRUS was utilized during and after applicator insertion, with each needle's visibility documented through axial images at the high-risk clinical target volume's largest diameter. Needle visibility on TRUS was scored from 0 (no visibility) to 3 (excellent discrimination, margins distinct). Quantitative assessment involved measuring the distance between tandem and each needle on TRUS and comparing it to respective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. Expected treatment plan quality based on TRUS images was rated from 1 (meeting all planning objectives) to 4 (violation of High-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) and/or organ at risk (OAR) hard constraints) and compared to the final MRI-based plan.

RESULTS

Analysis included 23 patients with local FIGO stage IB2-IVA, comprising 41 applications with a total of 230 needles. A high visibility rate of 99.1% (228/230 needles) was observed, with a mean visibility score of 2.5 ± 0.7 for visible needles. The maximum and mean difference between MRI and TRUS measurements were 8 mm and -0.1 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, with > 3 mm discrepancies in 3.5% of needles. Expected treatment plan quality after TRUS assessment exactly aligned with the final MRI plan in 28 out of 41 applications with only minor deviations in all other cases.

CONCLUSION

Real-time TRUS-guided interstitial needle placement yielded high-quality implants, thanks to excellent needle visibility during insertion. This supports the potential of TRUS-guided brachytherapy as a promising modality for gynecological indications.

Modern Tools for Modern Brachytherapy

This review aims to showcase the brachytherapy tools and technologies that have emerged during the last 10 years. Soft-tissue contrast using magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging has seen enormous growth in use to plan all forms of brachytherapy. The era of image-guided brachytherapy has encouraged the development of advanced applicators and given rise to the growth of individualised 3D printing to achieve reproducible and predictable implants. These advances increase the quality of implants to better direct radiation to target volumes while sparing normal tissue. Applicator reconstruction has moved beyond manual digitising, to drag and drop of three-dimensional applicator models with embedded pre-defined source pathways, ready for auto-recognition and automation. The simplified TG-43 dose calculation formalism directly linked to reference air kerma rate of high-energy sources in the medium water remains clinically robust. Model-based dose calculation algorithms accounting for tissue heterogeneity and applicator material will advance the field of brachytherapy dosimetry to become more clinically accurate. Improved dose-optimising toolkits contribute to the real-time and adaptive planning portfolio that harmonises and expedites the entire image-guided brachytherapy process. Traditional planning strategies remain relevant to validate emerging technologies and should continue to be incorporated in practice, particularly for cervical cancer. Overall, technological developments need commissioning and validation to make the best use of the advanced features by understanding their strengths and limitations. Brachytherapy has become high-tech and modern by respecting tradition and remaining accessible to all.

Risk and Quality in Brachytherapy From a Technical Perspective

AIMS

To provide an overview of the history of incidents in brachytherapy and to describe the pillars in place to ensure that medical physicists deliver high-quality brachytherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the literature was carried out to identify reported incidents in brachytherapy, together with an evaluation of the structures and processes in place to ensure that medical physicists deliver high-quality brachytherapy. In particular, the role of education and training, the use of process and technical quality assurance and the role of international guidelines are discussed.

RESULTS

There are many human factors in brachytherapy procedures that introduce additional risks into the process. Most of the reported incidents in the literature are related to human factors. Brachytherapy-related education and training initiatives are in place at the societal and departmental level for medical physicists. Additionally, medical physicists have developed process and technical quality assurance procedures, together with international guidelines and protocols. Education and training initiatives, together with quality assurance procedures and international guidelines may reduce the risk of human factors in brachytherapy.

CONCLUSION

Through application of the three pillars (education and training; process control and technical quality assurance; international guidelines), medical physicists will continue to minimise risk and deliver high-quality brachytherapy treatments.

A new technique for performing interstitial implants for gynecologic malignancies using transvaginal ultrasound guidance

Objectives

This study concerns a new technique that aims to achieve precise interstitial brachytherapy of pelvic recurrent tumors under transvaginal ultrasound (US) guidance, enhance the conformity index of the brachytherapy (BT), and improve the curative effect of radiotherapy for gynecological oncology patients with pelvic relapse.

Methods

A real-time transvaginal US-guided interstitial implant device was developed to assist in implant BT. Prior to implant brachytherapy, the size and location of the tumor in the pelvis and the interrelationship with adjacent organs were first assessed with intracavitary ultrasound. The transvaginal US-guided interstitial implant device was then placed on the endoluminal ultrasound probe, the probe was oriented intravaginally to determine a safe needle path, the implant needle was placed into the needle passage of the device, and the implant needle was inserted into the tumor tissue in the direction guided by the ultrasound puncture guide line. After the implant needle was placed in place, the cover of the transvaginal US-guided interstitial implant device was opened perpendicular to the ultrasound probe, and the needle was separated from the ultrasound probe smoothly, and then the cover was re-covered for subsequent implantation.

Results

In this study, 56 patients who underwent real-time transvaginal ultrasound-guided implantation for gynecologic oncology were enrolled, and insertion of 736 implant needles was completed. Among them, 13 patients had recurrent pelvic tumors after cervical cancer surgery and 6 patients had recurrent pelvic tumors after endometrial cancer surgery. Thirty-two patients who underwent radical radiation therapy for cervical cancer did not have adequate regression of parametrial invaded tissue after completion of standard EBRT treatment; and 5 patients had recurrent tumors in the radiation field after previous standard course of pelvic radiotherapy. The accuracy of the implant therapy was improved. The radiotherapy dose for recurrent pelvic masses was successfully increased, and the cumulative dose of external irradiation combined with BT was augmented to 80–100 Gy. The use of a new device for transvaginal implant for recurrent masses located in the lateral wall of the pelvic cavity was successful.

Conclusion

This intravascular US-guided interstitial implant device can realize interstitial implant with the shortest path under transvaginal US guidance. With convenient operation, high precision, and good security, the device not only improves the accuracy of implant therapy, but it also reduces the risks of anesthesia and organ injury, so it is suitable for widespread promotion and use.

Contemporary image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: Consensus imaging recommendations from the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Brachytherapy Society

PURPOSE

To present recommendations for the use of imaging for evaluation and procedural guidance of brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

An expert panel comprised of members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease Focused Panel and the American Brachytherapy Society jointly assessed the existing literature and provide data-driven guidance on imaging protocol development, interpretation, and reporting.

RESULTS

Image-guidance during applicator implantation reduces rates of uterine perforation by the tandem. Postimplant images may be acquired with radiography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and CT or MRI are preferred due to a decrease in severe complications. Pre-brachytherapy T2-weighted MRI may be used as a reference for contouring the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) when CT is used for treatment planning. Reference CT and MRI protocols are provided for reference.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer is essential for optimal patient management. Various imaging modalities, including orthogonal radiographs, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, remain integral to the successful execution of image-guided brachytherapy.

High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy for Deeply Situated Gynecologic Tumors Guided by Combination of Transrectal and Transabdominal Ultrasonography: A Technical Note

Background and Purpose

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) is recommended to obtain a better local tumor control for uterine cancer patients in specific situations such as bulky lesions, an extension to the lateral parametrium, or tumors with irregular shapes. Our group uses real-time transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) to guide freehand interstitial needle insertion. Occasionally, target tumors locate deeper beyond the rectum and cannot be visualized by TRUS. CT can guide needles to deeply located tumors, but in such cases, repeated image obtainment is required to achieve ideal needle localization. In this report, we present nine cases of patients who underwent HDR-ISBT for deeply situated tumors guided by a combination of transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography (TR/TA-US).

Material and Methods

Nine uterine cancer patients whose tumors were located deeper than the reach of TRUS and underwent HDR-ISBT guided by TR/TA-US were presented. All nine cases had no distal organ metastasis and underwent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the pelvic region for 45–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions followed by boost HDR-ISBT for deeply situated tumors guided by TR/TA-US.

Results

There were seven cervical cancer and two endometrial cancer patients: six with extensive uterine corpus invasion, one cervical cancer with massive pelvic lymph node metastasis, one cervical cancer with postoperative pelvic recurrence, and one with left ovarian direct tumor invasion. The median follow-up period was 15 months (range 3–28 months). The average clinical target volume at the time of first HDR-ISBT was 131 ml (range 44–335 ml). The linear distance from the vaginal entrance to the deepest part of the tumor at first time brachytherapy of nine cases was 14.0 (9.0–17.0) cm. HDR-ISBT dose fractionation was 24–30 Gy in four or five fractions. Seven out of nine cases had no local recurrence in the follow-up period. One had local in-field recurrence 25 months after HDR-ISBT. Another case with carcinosarcoma could not obtain local control and underwent salvage hysterectomy for a residual uterine tumor 11 months after HDR-ISBT. Four cases had extra-field recurrence in lymph nodes or distant organs.

Conclusions

In brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies, deeply situated tumors located out of reach of TRUS may obtain favorable local control by HDR-ISBT guided with TR/TA-US.

GEC-ESTRO ACROP prostate brachytherapy guidelines

This is an evidence-based guideline for prostate brachytherapy. Throughout levels of evidence quoted are those from the Oxford Centre for Evidence based Medicine (https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/oxford-centre-for-evidence-based-medicine-levels-of-evidence-march-2009). Prostate interstitial brachytherapy using either permanent or temporary implantation is an established and evolving treatment technique for non-metastatic prostate cancer. Permanent brachytherapy uses Low Dose Rate (LDR) sources, most commonly I-125, emitting photon radiation over months. Temporary brachytherapy involves first placing catheters within the prostate and, on confirmation of accurate positioning, temporarily introducing the radioactive source, generally High Dose Rate (HDR) radioactive sources of Ir-192 or less commonly Co-60. Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy has also been used for prostate cancer [1] but few centres have adopted this approach. Previous GEC ESTRO recommendations have considered LDR and HDR separately [2-4] but as there is considerable overlap, this paper provides updated guidance for both treatment techniques. Prostate brachytherapy allows safe radiation dose escalation beyond that achieved using external beam radiotherapy alone as it has greater conformity around the prostate, sparing surrounding rectum, bladder, and penile bulb. In addition there are fewer issues with changes in prostate position during treatment delivery. Systematic review and randomised trials using both techniques as boost treatments demonstrate improved PSA control when compared to external beam radiotherapy alone [5-7].

Implementation of a real-time, ultrasound-guided prostate HDR brachytherapy program

This work presents a comprehensive commissioning and workflow development process of a real-time, ultrasound (US) image-guided treatment planning system (TPS), a stepper and a US unit. To adequately benchmark the system, commissioning tasks were separated into (1) US imaging, (2) stepper mechanical, and (3) treatment planning aspects. Quality assurance US imaging measurements were performed following the AAPM TG-128 and GEC-ESTRO recommendations and consisted of benchmarking the spatial resolution, accuracy, and low-contrast detectability. Mechanical tests were first used to benchmark the electronic encoders within the stepper and were later expanded to evaluate the needle free length calculation accuracy. Needle reconstruction accuracy was rigorously evaluated at the treatment planning level. The calibration length of each probe was redundantly checked between the calculated and measured needle free length, which was found to be within 1 mm for a variety of scenarios. Needle placement relative to a reference fiducial and coincidence of imaging coordinate origins were verified to within 1 mm in both sagittal and transverse imaging planes. The source strength was also calibrated within the interstitial needle and was found to be 1.14% lower than when measured in a plastic needle. Dose calculations in the TPS and secondary dose calculation software were benchmarked against manual TG-43 calculations. Calculations among the three calculation methods agreed within 1% for all calculated points. Source positioning and dummy coincidence was tested following the recommendations of the TG-40 report. Finally, the development of the clinical workflow, checklists, and planning objectives are discussed and included within this report. The commissioning of real-time, US-guided HDR prostate systems requires careful consideration among several facets including the image quality, dosimetric, and mechanical accuracy. The TPS relies on each of these components to develop and administer a treatment plan, and as such, should be carefully examined.

MR compatibility, safety and accuracy of the redesigned UMC Utrecht single needle implant device

Purpose. The Utrecht single needle implant device (SNID) was redesigned to increase needle insertion velocity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the magnetic resonance compatibility, safety and accuracy of the implant device preparing its application in a patient study to investigate the feasibility of inserting a brachytherapy needle into the prostate to a defined tumor target point.Methods. Several experiments were performed to evaluate the mechanical and radiofrequency safety of the needle system, the magnetic field perturbation, the calibration of the implant device in the MR coordinate system, functioning of the implant device during imaging and accuracy of needle insertion.Results. Endurance experiments showed the mechanical safety of the needle system. Magnetic field perturbation was acceptable with induced image distortions smaller than 0.5 mm for clinical MR sequences. Calibration of the implant device in the MR coordinate system was reproducible with average error (mean±standard deviation) of 0.2 ± 0.4 mm, 0.1 ± 0.3 mm and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm in thex,y- andz- direction, respectively. The RF safety measurement showed for clinical MR imaging sequences maximum temperature rises of 0.2 °C at the entry and tip points of the needle. Simultaneous functioning of the implant device and imaging is possible albeit with some intensity band artifacts in the fast field echo images. Finally, phantom measurements showed deviations amounting 2.5-3.6 mm measured as target-to-needle distance at a depth of 12 cm.Conclusions. This preclinical evaluation showed that the MR compatibility, safety and accuracy of the redesigned UMC Utrecht SNID allow its application in a patient study on the feasibility of inserting a brachytherapy needle into the prostate to a defined tumor target point.

Advantages of real-time transabdominal ultrasound guidance in combined interstitial/intracavitary cervical brachytherapy: a case-based review

Sub-optimal placement of both intracavitary devices and interstitial needles is a relatively common occurrence in cervical brachytherapy, which may reduce the accuracy of dose distribution and contribute to adverse toxicities. To mitigate complications, improve target dose coverage, and verify proper device placement, implants may be placed under real-time image guidance. Traditionally, transrectal ultrasound has been used for needle guidance. However, we have utilized transabdominal ultrasound (TA-US) in our brachytherapy center. The purpose of this pictorial essay was to provide a pictorial description of TA-US technique, present a retrospective review of our preliminary outcomes adopting TA-US into routine practice, and to discuss the advantages of real-time ultrasound image guidance for placement of intrauterine tandem and interstitial needles.

Quality Assurance in Modern Gynecological HDR-Brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy): Clinical Considerations and Comments

Simple Summary

This is a focused review discussing quality assurance during interventional brachytherapy in gynecological cancers. This topic is very large and is usually addressed from the technical and physical sides, therefore, we decided to select “hot-spots” under this large title and discuss them from the point of view of clinicians. We hope that this concise and focused review will help clinicians in improving their quality assurance protocols and draw attention to the discussed issues.

Abstract

The use of brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) in the treatment of gynecological cancers is a crucial element in both definitive and adjuvant settings. The recent developments in high-dose rate remote afterloaders, modern applicators, treatment-planning software, image guidance, and dose monitoring systems have led to improvement in the local control rates and in some cases improved the survival rates. The development of these highly advanced and complicated treatment modalities has been accompanied by challenges, which have made the existence of quality assurance protocols a must to ensure the integrity of the treatment process. Quality assurance aims at standardizing the technical and clinical procedures involved in the treatment of patients, which could eventually decrease the source of uncertainties whether technical (source/equipment related) or clinical. This commentary review sheds light (from a clinical point of view) on some potential sources of uncertainties associated with the use of modern brachytherapy in the treatment of gynecological cancers.

A review of brachytherapy physical phantoms developed over the last 20 years: clinical purpose and future requirements

Within the brachytherapy community, many phantoms are constructed in-house, and less commercial development is observed as compared to the field of external beam. Computational or virtual phantom design has seen considerable growth; however, physical phantoms are beneficial for brachytherapy, in which quality is dependent on physical processes, such as accuracy of source placement. Focusing on the design of physical phantoms, this review paper presents a summary of brachytherapy specific phantoms in published journal articles over the last twenty years (January 1, 2000 - December 31, 2019). The papers were analyzed and tabulated by their primary clinical purpose, which was deduced from their associated publications. A substantial body of work has been published on phantom designs from the brachytherapy community, but a standardized method of reporting technical aspects of the phantoms is lacking. In-house phantom development demonstrates an increasing interest in magnetic resonance (MR) tissue mimicking materials, which is not yet reflected in commercial phantoms available for brachytherapy. The evaluation of phantom design provides insight into the way, in which brachytherapy practice has changed over time, and demonstrates the customised and broad nature of treatments offered.