Cystic tumors of the pancreas: imaging and management

Abdominal ultrasound in the characterization of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: A new tool for surveillance of low-risk patients?

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is regarded as gold-standard for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) follow-up. Given the low risk of transformation and the increasing population under surveillance, there is growing interest in identifying optimal follow-up strategies.

AIM

To evaluate reliability of abdominal ultrasound (US) for characterization of low-risk IPMN, compared to MRI.

METHODS

Prospective monocentric study among 79 consecutive patients with a suspected BD-IPMN on US. Each patient underwent confirmatory MRI. We evaluated Cohen's kappa statistic and concordance rate (CR) between MRI and US.

RESULTS

Of 79 suspected IPMNs on US, MRI confirmed 71 BD-IPMNs. There was high agreement for cyst location and number (CR and kappa of 77.5 % and 81.7 % and 0.66±0.08 and 0.62±0.11 respectively). We found high agreement for cyst size (CR=96.5 %, kappa=0.93±0.05) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation (CR=100 %, kappa=1). There was a good agreement for thickened septa (CR=80.3 %, kappa=0.38±0.12). US seems inferior to MRI for the identification of mural nodules < 5 mm (CR=97.2 %, kappa=0).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of low-risk BD-IPMN, US presented high agreement rate with MRI regarding location, number, and size. There was a good agreement for MPD dilatation and thickened septa, while US underperform for detection of mural nodules < 5 mm.

Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Imaging Techniques and Diagnostic Features

The detection of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions has increased over time. It is crucial to separate benign from potentially malignant or malignant lesions to guide management and reduce morbidity and mortality. The key imaging features used to fully characterize cystic lesions are optimally assessed by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, with pancreas protocol computed tomography offering a complementary role. While some imaging features have high specificity for a particular diagnosis, overlapping imaging features between diagnoses may require further investigation with follow-up diagnostic imaging or tissue sampling.

Pancreatic Cystic Tumors: A Single-Center Observational Study

Background and Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze the prevalence and characteristics of pancreatic cystic tumors (PCTs). Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 124 patients, 102 (69%) women and 46 (31%) men, who had undergone surgery for pancreatic cystic tumors in 2014-2018. Among 148 pancreatic cysts, 24 (16%) were non-neoplasmatic and 124 (84%) were neoplasmatic. The neoplasmatic cysts (n = 124) were included in our analysis. There were five main types of PCTs: IPMN (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm) (n = 45), MCN (mucinous cystic neoplasm) (n = 30), SCN (serous cystic neoplasm) (n = 28), SPN (solid pseudopapillary neoplasm) (n = 8), and CPEN (cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasm) (n = 8), as well as mixed-type tumors (n = 5). Results: A statistically significant dependency between PCT type and age was proven (p= 0.0001): IPMNs were observed in the older group of patients with an average age of 66.12 (40-79) years while SPNs were noted in the youngest group of patients with an average age of 36.22 (22-55) years. A statistically significant association between PCT type and gender (p = 0.0001) was found: IPMNs occurred among 24 (53.33%) men and 21 (46.6%) women. In the MCN and SPN groups, all patients were female (100%). Among the SCN group, the majority were women (27 (96.43%)), and there was only 1 (3.57%) man. A statistically significant dependency between PCT type and size was proven (p = 0.0007). The mean size of IPMNs was the smallest 2.95 (0.6-10 cm) and the mean size of MCNs was the largest 6.78 (1.5-19 cm). A statistically significant dependency between PCT type and tumor location was proven (p = 0.000238). The most frequent location of IPMN was the pancreatic head: 27 (60%). MCN was most frequently located in the pancreatic tail (18 (60%)). Most (10/28) SCNs were found in the pancreatic tail (10 (35.71%)). CPENs were most frequently located in the pancreatic tail (three (37.5%)) and pancreatic body and tail (three (37.5%)). SPNs were located commonly in the pancreatic head (five (62.5%)). The type of surgery depended on the tumor location. The most frequent surgery for IPMNs was pancreatoduodenectomy (44.4%), while for MCNs and SCNs, it was distal pancreatectomy (81%). The postoperative morbidity and mortality were 34.68% and 1.61%, respectively. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was the most frequent (29%) complication. Conclusions: IPMN was the most frequent resected PCT in our material. A statistically significant association between the type of cyst and location within the pancreas, size, local lymph node involvement, and patient's age and sex was proved. POPF was the most frequent postoperative complication. In patients with PCTs, due to substantial postoperative morbidity, adequate patient selection, considering both the surgical risk as well as the long-term risk of malignant transformation, is very important during qualification for surgery.

Pancreatic Serous Cystic Neoplasms and Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms: Differential Diagnosis by Combining Imaging Features and Enhanced CT Texture Analysis

Objective

To establish a diagnostic model by combining imaging features with enhanced CT texture analysis to differentiate pancreatic serous cystadenomas (SCNs) from pancreatic mucinous cystadenomas (MCNs).

Materials and Methods

Fifty-seven and 43 patients with pathology-confirmed SCNs and MCNs, respectively, from one center were analyzed and divided into a training cohort (n = 72) and an internal validation cohort (n = 28). An external validation cohort (n = 28) from another center was allocated. Demographic and radiological information were collected. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and recursive feature elimination linear support vector machine (RFE_LinearSVC) were implemented to select significant features. Multivariable logistic regression algorithms were conducted for model construction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the models were evaluated, and their prediction efficiency was quantified by the area under the curve (AUC), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Following multivariable logistic regression analysis, the AUC was 0.932 and 0.887, the sensitivity was 87.5% and 90%, and the specificity was 82.4% and 84.6% with the training and validation cohorts, respectively, for the model combining radiological features and CT texture features. For the model based on radiological features alone, the AUC was 0.84 and 0.91, the sensitivity was 75% and 66.7%, and the specificity was 82.4% and 77% with the training and validation cohorts, respectively.

Conclusion

This study showed that a logistic model combining radiological features and CT texture features is more effective in distinguishing SCNs from MCNs of the pancreas than a model based on radiological features alone.

Discrimination of serous cystadenoma from mucinous cystic neoplasm and branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in the pancreas with CT

PURPOSE

The imaging features of serous cystadenomas (SCAs) overlap with those of mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) and branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs), and an accurate preoperative diagnosis is important for clinical treatment due to their different biological behaviors. The aim of this study was to provide a computed tomographic (CT) feature for the diagnosis of SCAs and estimate whether the "circumvascular sign" can contribute to the discrimination of SCAs from MCNs and BD-IPMNs.

METHODS

From August 2011 through December 2019, a total of 71 patients (30 patients with 30 SCAs, 21 patients with 21 MCNs and 20 patients with 22 BP-IPMNs) were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent CT examination and were confirmed by surgical pathology. In addition to patient clinical information, CT features (e.g., location, shape) were evaluated via CT.

RESULTS

Central scarring, central calcification and the circumvascular sign were found to be specific CT features for the diagnosis of SCAs and their differential diagnosis from MCNs and BD-IPMNs. All three CT features had high specificity, and both central scarring and central calcification had low sensitivity. When any one of these two features was combined with the circumvascular sign, the sensitivity increased to 83.3%.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms that show central scarring, central calcification or the circumvascular sign on CT could be diagnosed as SCAs. When either of the first two features is combined with the circumvascular sign, the diagnostic sensitivity could be increased.

A prospective study on endoscopic ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of serous cystic neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms

Background

To provide criteria for the differential diagnosis of serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) by analyzing the imaging features of these two neoplasms by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).

Methods

From April 2015 to December 2017, a total of 69 patients were enrolled in this study. All patients were confirmed to have MCNs (31 patients) or SCNs (38 patients) by surgical pathology. All patients underwent EUS examination. The observation and recorded items were size, location, shape, cystic wall thickness, number of septa, and solid components.

Results

Head/neck location, lobulated shape, thin wall and > 2 septa were the specific imaging features for the diagnosis of SCNs. When any two imaging features were combined, we achieved the highest area under the curve (Az) (0.824), as well as the appropriate sensitivity (84.2%), specificity (80.6%), positive predictive value (PPV) (84.2%), and negative predictive value (NPV) (80.6%). Body/tail location, round shape, thick wall and 0–2 septa were the specific imaging features for the diagnosis of MCNs. When any three imaging features were combined, we obtained the highest Az value (0.808), as well as the appropriate sensitivity (77.4%), specificity (84.2%), PPV (80.0%) and NPV (82.1%).

Conclusions

Pancreatic cystadenomas that meet any two of the four imaging features of head/neck location, lobulated shape, thin wall and > 2 septa could be diagnosed as SCNs, and those that meet any three of the four imaging features of body/tail location, round shape, thick wall and 0–2 septa could be considered as MCNs.

Trial registration

The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The registration identification number is ChiCTR-OOC-15006118. The date of registration is 2015-03-20.

Discrimination of Pancreatic Serous Cystadenomas From Mucinous Cystadenomas With CT Textural Features: Based on Machine Learning

Objectives: This study was designed to estimate the performance of textural features derived from contrast-enhanced CT in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic serous cystadenomas and pancreatic mucinous cystadenomas.

Methods: Fifty-three patients with pancreatic serous cystadenoma and 25 patients with pancreatic mucinous cystadenoma were included. Textural parameters of the pancreatic neoplasms were extracted using the LIFEx software, and were analyzed using random forest and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) methods. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets with a ratio of 4:1; random forest method was adopted to constructed a diagnostic prediction model. Scoring metrics included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC.

Results: Radiomics features extracted from contrast-enhanced CT were able to discriminate pancreatic mucinous cystadenomas from serous cystadenomas in both the training group (slice thickness of 2 mm, AUC 0.77, sensitivity 0.95, specificity 0.83, accuracy 0.85; slice thickness of 5 mm, AUC 0.72, sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.84, accuracy 0.86) and the validation group (slice thickness of 2 mm, AUC 0.66, sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.71, accuracy 0.74; slice thickness of 5 mm, AUC 0.75, sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.83, accuracy 0.83).

Conclusions: In conclusion, our study provided preliminary evidence that textural features derived from CT images were useful in differential diagnosis of pancreatic mucinous cystadenomas and serous cystadenomas, which may provide a non-invasive approach to determine whether surgery is needed in clinical practice. However, multicentre studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm these results.

Role of abdominal ultrasound for the surveillance follow-up of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a cost-effective safe alternative to the routine use of magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN), without surgical indication at the time of diagnosis according to current guidelines, require lifetime image-based surveillance follow-up. In these patients, the current European evidenced-based guidelines advise magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning every 6 mo in the first year, then annually for the next five years, without reference to any role for trans-abdominal ultrasound (US). In this study, we report on our clinical experience of a follow-up strategy of image-based surveillance with US, and restricted use of MRI every two years and for urgent evaluation whenever suspicious changes are detected by US.

AIM

To report the results and cost-efficacy of a US-based surveillance follow-up for known PCNs, with restricted use of MRI.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the records of all the patients treated in our institution with non-surgical PCN who received follow-up abdominal US and restricted MRI from the time of diagnosis, between January 2012 and January 2017. After US diagnosis and MRI confirmation, all patients underwent US surveillance every 6 mo for the first year, and then annually. A MRI scan was routinely performed every 2 years, or at any stage for all suspicious US findings. In this communication, we reported the clinical results of this alternative follow-up, and the results of a comparative cost-analysis between our surveillance protocol (abdominal US and restricted MRI) and the same patient cohort that has been followed-up in strict accordance with the European guidelines recommended for an exclusive MRI-based surveillance protocol.

RESULTS

In the 5-year period, 200 patients entered the prescribed US-restricted MRI surveillance follow-up. Mean follow-up period was 25.1 ± 18.2 mo. Surgery was required in two patients (1%) because of the appearance of suspicious features at imaging (with complete concordance between the US scan and the on-demand MRI). During the follow-up, US revealed changes in PCN appearance in 28 patients (14%). These comprised main pancreatic duct dilatation (n = 1), increased size of the main cyst (n = 14) and increased number of PNC (n = 13). In all of these patients, MRI confirmed US findings, without adding more information. The bi-annual MRI identified evolution of the lesions not identified by US in only 11 patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (5.5%), largely consisting of an increased number of very small PCN (P = 0.14). The overall mean cost of surveillance, based on a theoretical use of the European evidenced-based exclusive MRI surveillance in the same group of patients, would have been 1158.9 ± 798.6 € per patient, in contrast with a significantly lower cost of 366.4 ± 348.7 € (P < 0.0001) incurred by the US-restricted MRI surveillance used at our institution.

CONCLUSION

In patients with non-surgical PCN at the time of diagnosis, US surveillance could be a safe complementary approach to MRI, delaying and reducing the numbers of second level examinations and therefore reducing the costs.

Subspecialized radiology review at multidisciplinary pancreas conference: impact on patient management

PURPOSE

At our tertiary medical center, multidisciplinary subspecialists meet twice a week during a CME-accredited conference to discuss oncologic and non-oncologic patients with pancreatic diseases at which time a subspecialized abdominal staff radiologist reinterprets the patient's relevant imaging studies. This study assesses the changes in patient management due to imaging reinterpretation during multidisciplinary pancreas conference (MPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, imaging studies of all patients discussed at MPC between July 1 and December 31, 2015 were assessed for technical adequacy, and original reports analyzed for congruency with reinterpretation. Management measures included change in diagnosis, clinical stage, treatment, or workup. Additional data were obtained on referring services affected and their resultant change in practice. Changes in surgical resectability, surgical approach, or delayed operative dates were noted for surgeons. Changes in chemotherapeutic or radiation oncology regimens as well as decisions for additional imaging, laboratory workup, or histologic evaluation were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients were included (54.4% males, 45.6% females, mean age 63.71 years). Relevant imaging consisted of 142 abdominal CT scans, 112 abdominal MRI scans, 1 abdominal ultrasound, and 1 nuclear medicine octreotide study of which 69.4% were performed in-house. Image quality was deemed appropriate in 95.2%. Cases presented included solid pancreatic malignancies (n = 140; 55.6%), cystic pancreatic lesions (n = 41; 16.3%), acute and chronic inflammatory conditions (n = 52; 20.6%), and miscellaneous entities (n = 10; 4.0%); 9 (3.6%) cases were normal. Image reinterpretation was congruent with original reports in 56.7%, with minor, moderate, and major discrepancies occurring in 9.5, 26.2%, and 7.5% of cases, respectively. Incongruent reinterpretation was predominantly due to perceptional errors (false-negative reports due to missed findings) and interpretative errors (false-positive results due to over-reporting or misclassification of diagnoses). Services most commonly affected included surgical oncology, radiology, and gastroenterology at 16.7%, 13.1%, and 12.7% of cases, respectively. Management changes included a change in diagnosis in 8.7%, change in clinical stage in 8.7%, change in treatment in 17.9%, and further workup needed in 19.0% of patients, respectively. No change in management occurred in the remaining 61.5% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Subspecialized abdominal radiologist reinterpretation in the context of more comprehensive patient information heavily impacts the multidisciplinary management of patients with pancreatic disorders. Further efforts are needed to solidify the abdominal radiologist's role in the multidisciplinary clinical setting.

Pancreatic Imaging

Imaging of the endocrine pancreas is dominated by neuroendocrine tumors, a diverse category of neoplasms that may or may not cause symptoms from hormone hypersecretion. These tumors may also be evidence of several different genetic syndromes. Understanding the usefulness of different imaging modalities and entities that simulate neuroendocrine tumors is key for both radiologists and referring physicians.

Longterm follow-up of small pancreatic cystic lesions in liver transplant recipients

Incidental small pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are often found on preoperative imaging in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although these are considered benign or of low malignant potential, the influence of immunosuppression after OLT may be of concern. The aim of this study was to observe the longterm outcome of these small PCLs in post-OLT patients. An institutional OLT database of 1778 consecutive OLT patients from January 2000 to December 2010 was analyzed. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or endoscopic ultrasound at the time of OLT and all subsequent imaging, cytology, fluid analysis of PCLs, and patient status were evaluated. A total of 70 patients with 182 PCLs, of benign or low malignant potential, were identified with a mean follow-up time of 64 months. At initial diagnosis of PCLs in 48 patients, 7 branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (B-IPMNs), 1 serous cystadenoma (SCA), and 40 nonspecific benign cysts were identified. Final diagnosis at the end of the follow-up revealed 16 B-IPMNs, 3 SCAs, and a mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma, in which the latter developed 9 years after initial diagnosis of B-IPMN. During the follow-up time, average increase in size and number of PCLs were 4.5 mm and 1.4, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). The majority of incidental PCLs in OLT patients showed an indolent behavior despite immunosuppression. Risk of malignancy development was very low and comparable with normal population. Liver Transplantation 23 324-329 2017 AASLD.

Discrimination of serous cystadenoma from mucinous cystadenoma in the pancreas with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: a prospective study in 61 patients

Objectives

The preoperative diagnosis between serous cystadenomas (SCAs) and mucinous cystadenomas (MCAs) in pancreas is significant due to their completely different biological behaviors. The purpose of our study was to examine and compare detailed contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) images of SCAs and MCAs and to determine whether there are significant findings that can contribute to the discrimination between these two diseases.

Methods

From April 2015 to June 2016, 61 patients (35 patients with SCAs and 26 patients with MCAs) were enrolled in this study. Forty-three cases were confirmed by surgical pathology and 18 by comprehensive clinical diagnoses. All of the CEUS characteristics of these lesions were recorded: size, location, echogenicity, shape, wall characteristics, septa characteristics, and the presence of a honeycomb pattern or nodules. CEUS examinations were performed by two ultrasound physicians.

Results

Location (P=0.003), shape (P=0.000), thickness of the wall (P=0.005), the number of septa (P=0.001), and the honeycomb pattern (P=0.001) were statistically significantly different. A head–neck location, a lobulated shape, an inner regular honeycomb pattern, and a thin wall (<3 mm thick) were significant in diagnosing patients with SCAs. When two of these four findings were combined, we could achieve a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 80.8% to diagnose SCA; when three of these four findings were combined, the specificity was 100%. A body–tail location, a round/oval shape, 0–2 septa, and a thick wall (≥3 mm thick) were most often detected in patients with MCAs. When two of these four findings were combined, we could achieve a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 65.7% to diagnose MCA; when three of these four findings were combined, the area under the curve (Az) was highest at 0.832, with a sensitivity of 80.8% and a specificity of 85.7%.

Conclusions

The characteristics of tumor location, shape, thickness of the wall, the number of septa, and the honeycomb pattern by CEUS play an important role in the diagnosis of SCAs and MCAs. A combination of these findings can provide better diagnostic performance in the discrimination of SCAs from MCAs.

MDCT vs. MRI for incidental pancreatic cysts: measurement variability and impact on clinical management

PURPOSE

To investigate incidental pancreatic cysts (IPCs) size discrepancy in a cohort of patients receiving both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its impact on clinical management based on the 2010 American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines.

METHODS

This was a HIPAA-compliant, retrospective, IRB-approved study. Informed consent was waived. Patients with known IPCs and at least one case-pair, consisting of an abdominal CT and MRI examination within 180 days between 05/1999 and 12/2011, were included. Maximum diameter of cysts was measured in both the CT and MR examinations. A subset of 30 patients was measured by three radiologists independently to assess inter-observer variability. Absolute difference in diameter measurements between CT and MRI was calculated. Influence of cyst size, cyst location, and patient characteristics such as weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) on variability of size measurements were evaluated. Clinical impact in terms of current ACR guidelines was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 267 case-pairs of cysts in 113 patients were included in this study. 59/267 cysts were visualized on MRI but not on CT (22.1%, 95% CI 17.1%-27.1%; 32 patients, 64.6 ± 11.7 years, BMI 28.5 ± 4.8 kg/m²), with a median MRI cyst size of 7.8 mm, IQR 6.0-9.0 mm, range 2-17.8 mm. 208 case-pairs in 113 patients with a mean BMI of 26.9 ± 5.1 kg/m² (range 16.9-39.5 kg/m²) and mean cysts size of 13.4 ± 8.1 mm (range 3-49 mm) were seen in both CT and MRI. The mean absolute size difference for IPCs measured on MRI and CT was 2.1 ± 1.8 mm (median 1.5 mm, IQR 0.9-2.9 mm, range 0-9 mm). Absolute size difference between CT and MRI measurements increased with size of the cyst (r = 0.31, p < 0.001), whereas location of the cyst did not influence the absolute difference between CT and MRI measurements (p = 0.44). Patient weight and BMI had a negative correlation with the difference in cyst size between CT and MRI (weight r = -0.17, p = 0.023; BMI r = -0.17, p = 0.027), with cyst measurements being larger on MRI in thin patients and on CT in obese patients. Inter-reader variability was excellent (ICC = 0.99). In 12/208 (5.7%, 95% CI 2.7%-9.1%), variability between CT and MRI would have changed ACR-based follow-up recommendation.

CONCLUSION

There was a median difference of 1.5 mm between measurements of IPCs on CT vs. MRI. If imaging modality was switched during follow-up, variability of measurements may lead to inappropriate change of follow-up regimen in 6% of all cases. A single follow-up CT for incidental IPCs does not seem sufficient due to a high number (22%) of missed IPCs on CT.

Cystic pancreatic lesions: From increased diagnosis rate to new dilemmas

Cystic pancreatic lesions vary from benign to malignant entities and are increasingly detected on cross-sectional imaging. Knowledge of the imaging appearances of cystic pancreatic lesions may help radiologists in their diagnostic reporting and management. In this review, we discuss the morphologic classification of these lesions based on a diagnostic algorithm as well as the management of these lesions.

Ultrasonographic features and differential diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas

AIM: To explore the ultrasonographic features of solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas (SPTP) and their differential diagnosis from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) and pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS: Clinical data including conventional ultrasonographic characteristics for 52 patients with pathologically confirmed SPTP, 63 patients with PNET, and 68 patients with PC and the patterns of contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in 6 cases of SPTP, 10 cases of PNET and 21 cases of PC were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS: There were significant differences between the SPTP group and the PNET group in age, sex, jaundice, tumor size, shape, calcification, liquefaction, separation, blood flow, arterial phase and late phase enhancement mode and non-enhancement area in the lesions (P < 0.05), while presence of abdominal pain, elevated CA-199, number of tumors, location, expansion of the main pancreatic duct and recurrence or metastasis had no statistical significance (P > 0.05). There were significant differences between the SPTP group and the PC group in age, sex, abdominal pain, jaundice, elevated CA-199, tumor size, location, shape, calcification, liquefaction, expansion of the main pancreatic duct, recurrence or metastasis, arterial phase enhancement mode and non-enhancement area in the lesions (P < 0.05), while number of tumors, separation, blood flow and late phase enhancement mode had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: A solid or cystic-solid pancreatic tumor which shows peripheral ring enhancement in the arterial phase, hypo-enhancement in the late phase and central non-enhancement area could be considered as an SPTP in young female patients without jaundice, elevated CA-199 or main pancreatic duct dilation. It should be differentiated from PNET and PC.

Pancreatic Solid and Cystic Neoplasms: Diagnostic Evaluation and Intervention

High-resolution imaging modalities, such as multi-detector computed tomography, MR imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound, are frequently used alone or in combination to characterize focal solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Imaging in solid pancreatic neoplasms, typically adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors, is primarily used to detect and stage the extent of the tumor and to determine if complete surgical resection for cure is feasible. In cystic pancreatic masses, imaging aims to differentiate benign nonmucinous cystic lesions from potentially or frankly malignant mucin-producing cysts. Several noninvasive and invasive treatment options can be performed if surgical resection is not possible or contraindicated.

Imaging of pancreatic neoplasms

Ductal adenocarcinoma accounts for 85% to 90% of all solid pancreatic neoplasms, is increasing in incidence, and is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. There are currently no screening tests available for the detection of ductal adenocarcinoma. The only chance for cure in pancreatic adenocarcinoma is surgery. Imaging has a crucial role in the identification of the primary tumor, vascular variants, identification of metastases, disease response assessment to treatment, and prediction of respectability. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms can have a distinctive appearance and pattern of spread, which should be recognized on imaging for appropriate management of these patients.

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: Review of current knowledge, diagnostic challenges, and management options

Pancreatic cystic lesions are being detected with increasing frequency, largely due to advances in cross-sectional imaging. The most common neoplasms include serous cystadenomas, mucinous cystic neoplasms, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, and cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are currently used as imaging modalities. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration has proved to be a useful diagnostic tool, and enables an assessment of tumor markers, cytology, chemistries, and DNA analysis. Here, we review the current literature on pancreatic cystic neoplasms, including classification, diagnosis, treatment, and recommendations for surveillance. Data for this manuscript was acquired via searching the literature from inception to December 2014 on PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE.

Italian consensus guidelines for the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms

This report contains clinically oriented guidelines for the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms in patients fit for treatment. The statements were elaborated by working groups of experts by searching and analysing the literature, and then underwent a consensus process using a modified Delphi procedure. The statements report recommendations regarding the most appropriate use and timing of various imaging techniques and of endoscopic ultrasound, the role of circulating and intracystic markers and the pathologic evaluation for the diagnosis and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms.

Incidental pancreatic cysts: natural history and diagnostic accuracy of a limited serial pancreatic cyst MRI protocol

OBJECTIVES

To examine the natural history of incidentally detected pancreatic cysts and whether a simplified MRI protocol without gadolinium is adequate for lesion follow-up.

METHODS

Over a 10-year period, 301-patients with asymptomatic pancreatic cysts underwent follow-up (45 months ± 30). The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol included axial, coronal T2-weighted images, MR cholangiopancreatographic and fat suppressed T1-weighted sequences before and after gadolinium. Three radiologists independently reviewed the initial MRI, the follow-up studies using first only unenhanced images, then secondly gadolinium-enhanced-sequences. Lesion changes during follow-up were recorded and the added value of gadolinium-enhanced sequences was determined by classifying the lesions into risk categories.

RESULTS

Three hundred and one patients (1,174 cysts) constituted the study population. Only 35/301 patients (12 %) showed significant lesion change on follow-up. Using multivariate analysis the only independent factor of lesion growth (OR = 2.4; 95 % CI, 1.7-3.3; P < 0.001) and mural nodule development (OR = 1.9; 95 % CI, 1.1-3.4, P = 0.03) during follow-up was initial lesion size. No patient with a lesion initial size less than 2 cm developed cancer during follow-up. Intra-observer agreement with and without gadolinium enhancement ranged from 0.86 to 0.97. After consensus review of discordant cases, gadolinium-enhanced sequences demonstrated no added value.

CONCLUSION

Most incidental pancreatic cystic lesions did not demonstrate change during follow-up. The addition of gadolinium-enhanced-sequences had no added-value for risk assignment on serial follow-up.

KEY POINTS

Significant growth of pancreatic cysts occurred in a minority of patients only. No lesion <2 cm demonstrated any change during the first year of follow-up. Intra-observer agreement between MR pancreatic protocols with and without gadolinium was excellent. Gadolinium application had limited value for follow-up of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic lesions.

Institutional experience with solid pseudopapillary neoplasms: focus on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, conventional ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, and predictors of aggressive histology

OBJECTIVE

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are low-grade malignancies with an excellent prognosis, albeit with the potential for metastatic disease. This study details our institution's experience with the diagnosis and treatment of SPN, including clinical presentation, multimodality imaging findings, and potential predictors of aggressive tumor behavior.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional pathology database was searched through for all cases of SPN since 1988, yielding 51 patients. The electronic medical record was searched for clinical and demographic information regarding these patients, including age, sex, presenting symptoms, type of surgery, postoperative length of stay, tumor markers, and postsurgical follow-up. All available imaging data were reviewed, including those of 30 patients who underwent multidetector computed tomography, those of 9 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), those of 3 patients who underwent conventional ultrasound, and those of 11 patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound.

RESULTS

A total of 84% of patients were females, with a mean age of only 33 years. Prognosis was excellent, with a mean follow-up of 3 years without recurrence. Only 1 of the 51 patients developed metastatic disease to the liver 8 years after the surgery. On computed tomography, lesions tended to be large (5.3 cm), well circumscribed (29/30), round/oval (20/30), and encapsulated (23/30). The lesions often demonstrated calcification (14/30) and typically resulted in no biliary or pancreatic ductal dilatation. The lesions ranged from completely cystic to completely solid. On MRI, the lesions often demonstrated a T2 hypointense or enhancing capsule (6/9) and demonstrated internal blood products (5/9). The lesions tended to be devoid of vascularity on conventional ultrasound. Ten patients were found to have "aggressive" histology at presentation (T3 tumor, nodal involvement, perineural invasion, or vascular invasion). No demographic, clinical, or multidetector computed tomographic imaging features were found to correlate with aggressive histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain imaging features (eg, well-circumscribed mass with calcification, peripheral capsule, internal blood products, and lack of biliary/pancreatic ductal obstruction) on computed tomography and MRI are highly suggestive of the diagnosis of SPN, particularly when visualized in young female patients. However, it is not possible to predict aggressive histology on the basis of imaging findings, clinical presentation, or patient demographic features.