Central actions of angiotensin II on spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity in the trout Onc orhynchus mykiss

Central and Peripheral Effects of Urotensin II and Urotensin II-Related Peptides on Cardiac Baroreflex Sensitivity in Trout

The baroreflex response is an essential component of the cardiovascular regulation that buffers abrupt changes in blood pressure to maintain homeostasis. Urotensin II (UII) and its receptor UT are present in the brain and in peripheral cardiovascular tissues of fish and mammals. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of UII in these vertebrates provokes hypertension and tachycardia, suggesting that the cardio-inhibitory baroreflex response is impaired. Since nothing is known about the effect of UII on the cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), we decided to clarify the changes in spontaneous BRS using a cross spectral analysis technique of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval variabilities after ICV and intra-arterial (IA) injections of trout UII in the unanesthetized trout. We contrasted the effects of UII with those observed for the UII-related peptides (URP), URP1 and URP2. Compared with vehicle-injected trout, ICV injection of UII (5-500 pmol) produced a gradual increase in SBP, a decrease in the R-R interval (reflecting a tachycardia) associated with a dose-dependent reduction of the BRS. The threshold dose for a significant effect on these parameters was 50 pmol (BRS; -55%; 1450 ± 165 ms/kPa vs. 3240 ± 300 ms/kPa; P < 0.05). Only the 500-pmol dose of URP2 caused a significant increase in SBP without changing significantly the R-R interval but reduced the BRS. IA injection of UII (5-500 pmol) caused a dose-dependent elevation of SBP. Contrasting with the ICV effects of UII, the R-R interval increased (reflecting a bradycardia) up to the 50-pmol dose while the BRS remained unchanged (50 pmol; 2530 ± 270 ms/kPa vs. 2600 ± 180 ms/kPa; P < 0.05). Nonetheless, the highest dose of UII reduced the BRS as did the highest dose of URP1. In conclusion, the contrasting effect of low picomolar doses of UII after central and peripheral injection on the BRS suggests that only the central urotensinergic system is involved in the attenuation of the BRS. The limited and quite divergent effects of URP1 and URP2 on the BRS, indicate that the action of UII is specific for this peptide. Further studies are required to elucidate the site(s) and mechanisms of action of UII on the baroreflex pathways. Whether such effects of central UII on the BRS exist in mammals including humans warrants further investigations.

Renin-angiotensin system in vertebrates: phylogenetic view of structure and function

Renin substrate, biological renin activity, and/or renin-secreting cells in kidneys evolved at an early stage of vertebrate phylogeny. Angiotensin (Ang) I and II molecules have been identified biochemically in representative species of all vertebrate classes, although variation occurs in amino acids at positions 1, 5, and 9 of Ang I. Variations have also evolved in amino acid positions 3 and 4 in some cartilaginous fish. Angiotensin receptors, AT₁ and AT₂ homologues, have been identified molecularly or characterized pharmacologically in nonmammalian vertebrates. Also, various forms of angiotensins that bypass the traditional renin-angiotensin system (RAS) cascades or those from large peptide substrates, particularly in tissues, are present. Nonetheless, the phylogenetically important functions of RAS are to maintain blood pressure/blood volume homeostasis and ion-fluid balance via the kidney and central mechanisms. Stimulation of cell growth and vascularization, possibly via paracrine action of angiotensins, and the molecular biology of RAS and its receptors have been intensive research foci. This review provides an overview of: (1) the phylogenetic appearance, structure, and biochemistry of the RAS cascade; (2) the properties of angiotensin receptors from comparative viewpoints; and (3) the functions and regulation of the RAS in nonmammalian vertebrates. Discussions focus on the most fundamental functions of the RAS that have been conserved throughout phylogenetic advancement, as well as on their physiological implications and significance. Examining the biological history of RAS will help us analyze the complex RAS systems of mammals. Furthermore, suitable models for answering specific questions are often found in more primitive animals.

Central actions of serotonin and fluoxetine on the QT interval of the electrocardiogram in trout

QT interval of the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a measure of the duration of the ventricular depolarization and repolarization. In humans, prolongation of the QT interval is a known clinical risk factor for the development of ventricular arrhythmias including ‘Torsades de Pointes’ and possible sudden cardiac death. After oral administration, fluoxetine (FLX), as well as other selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) reuptake inhibitors can affect cardiac autonomic control, including the QT interval. However, the action of centrally administered FLX on the QT interval has never been explored. Consequently, using the unanesthetized trout as an animal model, we sought to compare the effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of FLX (5, 15 or 25 µg) on the QT interval of the ECG with the effects observed following i.c.v. injection of 5-HT (0.05, 0.5 or 5 nmol). The QT interval was corrected for the R–R interval. The highest doses of centrally administered FLX and 5-HT induced a prolongation of the corrected QT (QTc) interval reaching a maximum value of 5–10 min after injection (+8% and +6% respectively, P < 0.05). The intra-arterial (i.a.) injections of 5-HT and FLX were without significant effect on the QTc. The i.a. injection of blockers of the autonomic nervous system indicated that the sympathetic nervous system modulated the QTc interval. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that for the first time in any animal species, cardiac electrophysiology is sensitive to central 5-HT and that FLX within the brain may disrupt the autonomic control of ventricular repolarization.

Central ventilatory and cardiovascular actions of calcitonin gene-related peptide in unanesthetized trout

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its receptors are widely distributed in the tissues of teleost fish, including the brain, but little is known about the ventilatory and cardiovascular effects of the peptide in these vertebrates. The present study was undertaken to compare the central and peripheral actions of graded doses (5-50 pmol) of trout CGRP on ventilatory and cardiovascular variables in unanesthetized rainbow trout. Compared with vehicle, intracerebroventricular injection of CGRP significantly elevated the ventilation frequency (f(V)) and the ventilation amplitude (V(AMP)) and, consequently, the total ventilation (V(TOT)). The maximum hyperventilatory effect of CGRP (V(TOT): +300%), observed at a dose of 50 pmol, was mostly due to its stimulatory action on V(AMP) (+200%) rather than f(V) (+30%). In addition, CGRP produced a significant and dose-dependent increase in mean dorsal aortic blood pressure (P(DA)) (50 pmol: +40%) but the increase in heart rate (f(H)) was not significant. Intra-arterial injections of CGRP were without effect on the ventilatory variables but significantly and dose-dependently elevated P(DA) (50 pmol: +36%) without changing f(H). At the highest dose tested, this hypertensive phase was preceded by a rapid and transient hypotensive response. In conclusion, our study suggests that endogenous CGRP within the brain of the trout may act as a potent neurotransmitter and/or neuromodulator in the regulation of cardio-ventilatory functions. In the periphery, endogenous CGRP may act as a local and/or circulating hormone preferentially involved in vasoregulatory mechanisms.

Central ventilatory and cardiovascular actions of angiotensin peptides in trout

In the brains of teleosts, angiotensin II (ANG II), one of the main effector peptides of the renin-angiotensin system, is implicated in various physiological functions notably body fluid and electrolyte homeostasis and cardiovascular regulation, but nothing is known regarding the potential action of ANG II and other angiotensin derivatives on ventilation. Consequently, the goal of the present study was to determine possible ventilatory and cardiovascular effects of intracerebroventricular injection of picomole doses (5-100 pmol) of trout [Asn(1)]-ANG II, [Asp(1)]-ANG II, ANG III, ANG IV, and ANG 1-7 into the third ventricle of unanesthetized trout. The central actions of these peptides were also compared with their ventilatory and cardiovascular actions when injected peripherally. Finally, we examined the presence of [Asn(1)]-ANG II, [Asp(1)]-ANG II, ANG III, and ANG IV in the brain and plasma using radioimmunoassay coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography. After intracerebroventricular injection, [Asn(1)]-ANG II and [Asp(1)]-ANG II two ANG IIs, elevated the total ventilation through a selective stimulatory action on the ventilation amplitude. However, the hyperventilatory effect of [Asn(1)]-ANG II was threefold higher than the effect of [Asp(1)]-ANG II at the 50-pmol dose. ANG III, ANG IV, and ANG 1-7 were without effect. In addition, ANG IIs and ANG III increased dorsal aortic blood pressure (P(DA)) and heart rate (HR). After intra-arterial injections, none of the ANG II peptides affected the ventilation but [Asn(1)]-ANG II, [Asp(1)]-ANG II, and ANG III elevated P(DA) (50 pmol: +80%, +58% and +48%, respectively) without significant decrease in HR. In brain tissue, comparable amounts of [Asn(1)]-ANG II and [Asp(1)]-ANG II were detected (ca. 40 fmol/mg brain tissue), but ANG III was not detected, and the amount of ANG IV was about eightfold lower than the content of the ANG IIs. In plasma, ANG IIs were also the major angiotensins (ca. 110 fmol/ml plasma), while significant but lower amounts of ANG III and ANG IV were present in plasma. In conclusion, our study suggests that the two ANG II isoforms produced within the brain may act as a neurotransmitter and/or neuromodulator to regulate the cardioventilatory functions in trout. In the periphery, two ANG IIs and their COOH-terminal peptides may act as a circulating hormone preferentially involved in cardiovascular regulations.

Brain neuropeptides in central ventilatory and cardiovascular regulation in trout

Many neuropeptides and their G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are present within the brain area involved in ventilatory and cardiovascular regulation but only a few mammalian studies have focused on the integrative physiological actions of neuropeptides on these vital cardio-respiratory regulations. Because both the central neuroanatomical substrates that govern motor ventilatory and cardiovascular output and the primary sequence of regulatory peptides and their receptors have been mostly conserved through evolution, we have developed a trout model to study the central action of native neuropeptides on cardio-ventilatory regulation. In the present review, we summarize the most recent results obtained using this non-mammalian model with a focus on PACAP, VIP, tachykinins, CRF, urotensin-1, CGRP, angiotensin-related peptides, urotensin-II, NPY, and PYY. We propose hypotheses regarding the physiological relevance of the results obtained.

Central pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) decrease the baroreflex sensitivity in trout

Although PACAP and VIP exert diverse actions on heart and blood vessels along the vertebrate phylum, no information is currently available concerning the potential role of these peptides on the regulation of the baroreflex response, a major mechanism for blood pressure homeostasis. Consequently, the goal of this study was to examine in our experimental model, the unanesthetized rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, whether PACAP and VIP are involved in the regulation of the cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). Cross-spectral analysis techniques using a fast Fourier transform algorithm were employed to calculate the coherence, phase and gain of the transfer function between spontaneous fluctuations of systolic arterial blood pressure and R-R intervals of the electrocardiogram. The BRS was estimated as the mean of the gain of the transfer function when the coherence between the two signals was high and the phase negative. Compared with vehicle, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections of trout PACAP-27 and trout VIP (25-100 pmol) dose-dependently reduced the cardiac BRS to the same extent with a threshold dose of 50 pmol for a significant effect. When injected intra-arterially at the same doses as for i.c.v. injections, only the highest dose of VIP (100 pmol) significantly attenuated the BRS. These results suggest that the endogenous peptides PACAP and VIP might be implicated in the central control of cardiac baroreflex functions in trout.

Central cardiovascular actions of angiotensin II in trout

In mammals, a large body of evidence supports the existence of a brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) acting independently or synergistically with the endocrine RAS to maintain diverse physiological functions, notably cardiovascular homeostasis. The RAS is of ancient origin and although most components of the RAS are present within the brain of teleost fishes, little is known regarding the central physiological actions of the RAS in these vertebrates. The present review encompasses the most relevant functional data for a role of the brain RAS in cardiovascular regulations in our experimental animal model, the unanesthetized trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. This paper mainly focuses on the central effect of angiotensin II (ANG II) on heart rate, blood pressure, heart rate variability and cardiac baroreflex, after intracerebroventricular injection or local microinjection of the peptide within the dorsal vagal motor nucleus. The probable implications of the parasympathetic nervous system in ANG II-evoked changes in the cardiac responses are also discussed.

Central and peripheral cardiovascular, ventilatory, and motor effects of trout urotensin-II in the trout

Urotensin-II (U-II) was originally considered to be exclusively the product of the caudal neurosecretory system (CNSS) of teleost fish, but it has now been demonstrated that U-II is widely expressed in peripheral tissues and nervous structures of species from lampreys to mammals. However, very little is known regarding the physiological effects of this peptide in its species of origin. In the present review, we summarize the most significant results relating to the cardiovascular, ventilatory, and motor effects of centrally and peripherally administered synthetic trout U-II in our experimental animal model, the unanesthetized trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. In addition, we compare the actions of U-II with those of other neurohormonal peptides, particularly with the actions of urotensin-I, a 41-amino acid residue peptide paralogous to corticotropin-releasing hormone that is co-localized with U-II within neurons of the CNSS.