1
|
D'Gama JD, Bermas BL. Safety of biologic agents for the management of rheumatic diseases during pregnancy. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2024; 36:184-190. [PMID: 38456470 DOI: 10.1097/bor.0000000000001014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To discuss the current understanding regarding the use of biologic therapeutics in pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS Our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the potential fetal and infant exposure to biologics as well as a growing body of empirical evidence from real world use of biologics in pregnancy have demonstrated that biologics are generally compatible preconception and during pregnancy. Long-term effects of exposure to biologic agents in utero are not known, but will be uncovered in time. Biosimilars, which are becoming more popular, may not always share the same safety profiles as their originators. SUMMARY Biologics have revolutionized the management of rheumatologic disease and ushered in a new era of clinical remission among patients. These agents, developed and introduced into clinical use at the beginning of the new millennium, are very potent, yet their efficacy in treating disease often in reproductive aged women, raises questions regarding their safety during pregnancy. These therapeutics can cause immunosuppression and can inhibit immunologic circuits that are not only involved in disease pathophysiology but hypothetically could impact the development of the fetal immune system. Reassuringly, biologics, typically antibodies or antibody-based proteins, are introduced to the fetus via the typical route of transplacental antibody transfer, and thus only begin to be transferred in appreciable amounts in the second trimester (after organogenesis). From theoretic and empirical standpoints, biologic use during pregnancy appears well tolerated for fetal development and to not substantially affect infant immune development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D D'Gama
- Division of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kümpfel T, Giglhuber K, Aktas O, Ayzenberg I, Bellmann-Strobl J, Häußler V, Havla J, Hellwig K, Hümmert MW, Jarius S, Kleiter I, Klotz L, Krumbholz M, Paul F, Ringelstein M, Ruprecht K, Senel M, Stellmann JP, Bergh FT, Trebst C, Tumani H, Warnke C, Wildemann B, Berthele A. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management. J Neurol 2024; 271:141-176. [PMID: 37676297 PMCID: PMC10770020 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11910-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
This manuscript presents practical recommendations for managing acute attacks and implementing preventive immunotherapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), a rare autoimmune disease that causes severe inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), primarily affecting the optic nerves, spinal cord, and brainstem. The pillars of NMOSD therapy are attack treatment and attack prevention to minimize the accrual of neurological disability. Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG) are a diagnostic marker of the disease and play a significant role in its pathogenicity. Recent advances in understanding NMOSD have led to the development of new therapies and the completion of randomized controlled trials. Four preventive immunotherapies have now been approved for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD in many regions of the world: eculizumab, ravulizumab - most recently-, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. These new drugs may potentially substitute rituximab and classical immunosuppressive therapies, which were as yet the mainstay of treatment for both, AQP4-IgG-positive and -negative NMOSD. Here, the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) provides an overview of the current state of knowledge on NMOSD treatments and offers statements and practical recommendations on the therapy management and use of all available immunotherapies for this disease. Unmet needs and AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD are also discussed. The recommendations were developed using a Delphi-based consensus method among the core author group and at expert discussions at NEMOS meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Kümpfel
- Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Katrin Giglhuber
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Orhan Aktas
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ilya Ayzenberg
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Judith Bellmann-Strobl
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivien Häußler
- Department of Neurology and Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Havla
- Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hellwig
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Martin W Hümmert
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sven Jarius
- Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Kleiter
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Marianne-Strauß-Klinik, Behandlungszentrum Kempfenhausen für Multiple Sklerose Kranke, Berg, Germany
| | - Luisa Klotz
- Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Markus Krumbholz
- Department of Neurology and Pain Treatment, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, University Hospital of the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marius Ringelstein
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, LVR-Klinikum, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Klemens Ruprecht
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Makbule Senel
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jan-Patrick Stellmann
- Department of Neurology and Institute of Neuroimmunology and MS (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- APHM, Hopital de la Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France
- Aix Marseille University, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France
| | | | - Corinna Trebst
- Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Clemens Warnke
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Brigitte Wildemann
- Marianne-Strauß-Klinik, Behandlungszentrum Kempfenhausen für Multiple Sklerose Kranke, Berg, Germany
| | - Achim Berthele
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis is a disease that tends to affect women during their childbearing years. Although relapse risk decreases during pregnancy, patients should still be optimized on disease-modifying therapy before and after pregnancy to minimize gaps in treatment. Exclusive breastfeeding may reduce the chances of disease relapse postpartum, and many disease-modifying therapies are considered to be safe while breastfeeding. Treatments for other neuroimmunologic disorders such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, neurosarcoidosis, and central nervous system vasculitis may require rituximab before and prednisone or intravenous immunoglobulin therapy during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Vukusic S, Marignier R, Ciron J, Bourre B, Cohen M, Deschamps R, Guillaume M, Kremer L, Pique J, Carra-Dalliere C, Michel L, Leray E, Guennoc AM, Laplaud D, Androdias G, Bensa C, Bigaut K, Biotti D, Branger P, Casez O, Daval E, Donze C, Dubessy AL, Dulau C, Durand-Dubief F, Hebant B, Kwiatkowski A, Lannoy J, Maarouf A, Manchon E, Mathey G, Moisset X, Montcuquet A, Roux T, Maillart E, Lebrun-Frenay C. Pregnancy and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: 2022 recommendations from the French Multiple Sclerosis Society. Mult Scler 2023; 29:37-51. [PMID: 36345839 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221130934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2020, the French Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society (SFSEP) decided to develop a national evidence-based consensus on pregnancy in MS. As neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) shares a series of commonalities with MS, but also some significant differences, specific recommendations had to be developed. OBJECTIVES To establish recommendations on pregnancy in women with NMOSD. METHODS The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) reviewed PubMed and universities databases (January 1975 through June 2021). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, which was developed to synthesise the scientific literature and expert opinions on health care topics, was used to reach a formal agreement. Fifty-six MS experts worked on the full-text review and initial wording of recommendations. A sub-group of nine NMOSD experts was dedicated to analysing available data on NMOSD. A group of 62 multidisciplinary healthcare specialists validated the final proposal of summarised evidence. RESULTS A strong agreement was reached for all 66 proposed recommendations. They cover diverse topics, such as pregnancy planning, follow-up during pregnancy and postpartum, delivery routes, loco-regional analgesia or anaesthesia, prevention of postpartum relapses, breastfeeding, vaccinations, reproductive assistance, management of relapses, and disease-modifying treatments. CONCLUSION Physicians and patients should be aware of the new and specific evidence-based recommendations of the French MS Society for pregnancy in women with NMOSD. They should help harmonise counselling and treatment practise, allowing for better individualised choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Vukusic
- Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Bron, France/INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR 5292, Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Lyon, France/Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France/Eugène Devic EDMUS Foundation against Multiple Sclerosis, State-Approved Foundation, Bron, France
| | - Romain Marignier
- Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France/Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, and Centre de Référence des Maladies Inflammatoires Rares du Cerveau et de la Moelle (MIRCEM), Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Bron, France/FORGETTING Team, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR5292, Centre des Neurosciences de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jonathan Ciron
- Centre Ressources et Compétences Sclérose en Plaques (CRC-SEP) et Service de Neurologie B4, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Toulouse, France/INSERM UMR1291 - CNRS UMR5051, Institut Toulousain des Maladies Infectieuses et Inflammatoires (Infinity), Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Mikael Cohen
- CRCSEP Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice Pasteur 2, Nice, France/UR2CA-URRIS, Université Nice Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Romain Deschamps
- CRC-SEP, Neurology Department, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | | | - Laurent Kremer
- CRC-SEP, Service de Neurologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Julie Pique
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, and Centre de Référence des Maladies Inflammatoires Rares du Cerveau et de la Moelle (MIRCEM), Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Bron, France
| | - Clarisse Carra-Dalliere
- CRC-SEP, Neurology Department, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Laure Michel
- CIC_P1414 INSERM, Neurology Department, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Emmanuelle Leray
- EHESP, CNRS, Inserm, Arènes - UMR 6051, RSMS (Recherche sur les Services et Management en Santé), Université de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | - David Laplaud
- INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes Université, Nantes, France/CIC INSERM 1413, CRC-SEP Pays de la Loire, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Géraldine Androdias
- Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Bron, France/Ramsay Santé, Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France
| | - Caroline Bensa
- CRC-SEP, Neurology Department, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Bigaut
- CRC-SEP, Service de Neurologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Damien Biotti
- Centre Ressources et Compétences Sclérose en Plaques (CRC-SEP) et Service de Neurologie B4, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Toulouse Purpan, Toulouse, France/INSERM UMR1291 - CNRS UMR5051, Institut Toulousain des Maladies Infectieuses et Inflammatoires (Infinity), Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Branger
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Olivier Casez
- Neurologie, Pathologies Inflammatoires du Système Nerveux, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France/TIMC-IMAG, T-RAIG (Translational Research in Autoimmunity and Inflammation Group), Université de Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Elodie Daval
- Service de Neurologie, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Cécile Donze
- Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique de Lille, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Hôpital Saint Philibert, Lille, France
| | - Anne-Laure Dubessy
- APHP-6, Department of Neurology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France/Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Dulau
- CRC-SEP, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Françoise Durand-Dubief
- Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-Inflammation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Bron, France
| | | | - Arnaud Kwiatkowski
- Department of Neurology, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, Lille, France
| | - Julien Lannoy
- Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier de Lens, Lens, France
| | - Adil Maarouf
- CNRS, CRMBM, UMR 7339, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France/APHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Manchon
- Department of Neurology, Gonesse Hospital, Gonesse, France
| | - Guillaume Mathey
- Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Central, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Xavier Moisset
- Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France/Department of Neurology et CRC-SEP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Thomas Roux
- CRC-SEP, Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Maillart
- CRC-SEP, Neurology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Christine Lebrun-Frenay
- CRCSEP Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice Pasteur 2, Nice, France/UR2CA-URRIS, Université Nice Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Russell MD, Dey M, Flint J, Davie P, Allen A, Crossley A, Frishman M, Gayed M, Hodson K, Khamashta M, Moore L, Panchal S, Piper M, Reid C, Saxby K, Schreiber K, Senvar N, Tosounidou S, van de Venne M, Warburton L, Williams D, Yee CS, Gordon C, Giles I, Roddy E, Armon K, Astell L, Cotton C, Davidson A, Fordham S, Jones C, Joyce C, Kuttikat A, McLaren Z, Merrison K, Mewar D, Mootoo A, Williams E. British Society for Rheumatology guideline on prescribing drugs in pregnancy and breastfeeding: immunomodulatory anti-rheumatic drugs and corticosteroids. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 62:e48-e88. [PMID: 36318966 PMCID: PMC10070073 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D Russell
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mrinalini Dey
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Julia Flint
- Department of Rheumatology, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Shropshire, UK
| | - Philippa Davie
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alexander Allen
- Clinical Affairs, British Society for Rheumatology, London, UK
| | | | - Margreta Frishman
- Rheumatology, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mary Gayed
- Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Munther Khamashta
- Lupus Research Unit, Division of Women's Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Moore
- Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease Unit, Our Lady's Hospice and Care Service, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sonia Panchal
- Department of Rheumatology, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Warwickshire, UK
| | - Madeleine Piper
- Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
| | | | - Katherine Saxby
- Pharmacy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Karen Schreiber
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Sonderborg, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research (IRS), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Naz Senvar
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sofia Tosounidou
- Lupus UK Centre of Excellence, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - David Williams
- Obstetrics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chee-Seng Yee
- Department of Rheumatology, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Caroline Gordon
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ian Giles
- Centre for Rheumatology, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kastrati K, Aletaha D, Burmester GR, Chwala E, Dejaco C, Dougados M, McInnes IB, Ravelli A, Sattar N, Stamm TA, Takeuchi T, Trauner M, van der Heijde D, Voshaar MJH, Winthrop K, Smolen JS, Kerschbaumer A. A systematic literature review informing the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment with interleukin-6 pathway inhibition with biological DMARDs in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002359. [PMID: 36260501 PMCID: PMC9462104 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Informing an international task force updating the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) selectively targeting interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway in the context of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Methods A systematic literature research of all publications on IL-6 axis inhibition with bDMARDs published between January 2012 and December 2020 was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in clinical trials including their long-term extensions and observational studies. Meeting abstracts from ACR, EULAR conferences and results on clinicaltrials.gov were taken into consideration. Results 187 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Evidence for positive effect of IL-6 inhibition was available in various inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still’s disease, cytokine release syndrome due to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Newcomers like satralizumab and anti-IL-6 ligand antibody siltuximab have expanded therapeutic approaches for Castleman’s disease and neuromyelitis optica, respectively. IL-6 inhibition did not provide therapeutic benefits in psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and certain connective tissue diseases. In COVID-19, tocilizumab (TCZ) has proven to be therapeutic in advanced disease. Safety outcomes did not differ from other bDMARDs, except higher risks of diverticulitis and lower gastrointestinal perforations. Inconsistent results were observed in several studies investigating the risk for infections when comparing TCZ to TNF-inhibitors. Conclusion IL-6 inhibition is effective for treatment of several inflammatory diseases with a safety profile that is widely comparable to other bDMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kastriot Kastrati
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charite University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Chwala
- University Library, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Christian Dejaco
- Rheumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Rheumatology, Hospital of Bruneck, Bruneck, Italy
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Hopital Cochin, Rheumatology, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Iain B McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Angelo Ravelli
- UO Pediatria II-Reumatologia, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Naveed Sattar
- Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna Department of Medicine III, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Marieke J H Voshaar
- Department of Pharmacy and Department of Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin Winthrop
- Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. Current status and prospects of IL-6–targeting therapy. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:575-592. [DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2097905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Narazaki
- Department of Advanced Clinical and Translational Immunology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Clinical Immunology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Immunopathology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadamitsu Kishimoto
- Laboratory of Immune Regulation, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Favilli A, Mattei Gentili M, Raspa F, Giardina I, Parazzini F, Vitagliano A, Borisova AV, Gerli S. Effectiveness and safety of available treatments for COVID-19 during pregnancy: a critical review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35:2174-2187. [PMID: 32508168 PMCID: PMC7284138 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1774875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 is a pandemic disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 and it spread globally in the last few months. The complete lack of specific treatment forced clinicians to use old drugs, chosen for their efficacy against similar viruses or their in vitro activity. Trials on patients are ongoing but the majority of information comes from small case series and single center reports. We aimed to provide a literature review on the putative effectiveness and safety of available treatments for COVID-19 in pregnant women. METHODS We reviewed all the available literature concerning the drugs that have been used in the treatment of COVID-19 during pregnancy and whose safe assumption during pregnancy had been demonstrated by clinical studies (i.e. including studies on other infectious diseases). Drugs contra-indicated during pregnancy or with unknown adverse effects were not included in our review. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Clinical trials are not often conducted among pregnant patients for safety reasons and this means that drugs that may be effective in general population cannot be used for pregnant women due to the lack of knowledge of side effects in this category of people .The choice to use a specific drug for COVID-19 in pregnancy should take into account benefits and possible adverse events in each single case. In the current situation of uncertainty and poor knowledge about the management of COVID-19 during pregnancy, this present overview may provide useful information for physicians with practical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Mattei Gentili
- Department of Surgical and Biochemical
Sciences, Centre of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of
Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Francesca Raspa
- Department of Surgical and Biochemical
Sciences, Centre of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of
Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Irene Giardina
- Department of Surgical and Biochemical
Sciences, Centre of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of
Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Fabio Parazzini
- Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Dipartimento
Materno-Infantile, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano,
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Universita' di Milano,
Milan, Italy
| | - Amerigo Vitagliano
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health,
University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Anna V. Borisova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with
the Course of Perinatology, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN
University), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Sandro Gerli
- Department of Surgical and Biochemical
Sciences, Centre of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of
Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mohapatra S, Ananda P, Tripathy S. Pharmacological consideration of COVID-19 infection and vaccines in pregnancy. J Chin Med Assoc 2022; 85:537-542. [PMID: 35316227 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 is a pandemic of the 21st century that recorded 234 809 103 confirmed cases and more than 4 800 375 deaths. Many studies report the effect of COVID-19 in the overall population; nevertheless, there is information scarceness related to pharmacological management and pregnancy and fetal outcomes during the epidemic. Pregnancy is a state of change in immune physiology and anatomy modulation in preference to immune suppression. Additionally, manifold interactions with the health care system during pregnancy increases the chance of infection, and managing, pregnant population poses a more significant challenge. This review will summarize the available data on pharmacological considerations and vaccines in pregnancy and their adverse effects on fetal outcomes. Several drug choices include but are not limited to antivirals and antimalarial and combinations, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and antipyretics. Approved vaccines for pregnancy include Pfizer/BioNTech and mRNA-1273 Moderna/National Institutes of Health. COVID-19 treatment approaches vary across different countries; the WHO and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines and country regulators advise managing adverse effects on pregnancy and fetal outcome. But the efficacy of these drugs is questionable. There is no adequate literature to demonstrate the safety of these drugs in pregnant and lactating women. Hence, well-conducted studies that assess the safety of anti-COVID-19 medications and vaccines in pregnancy and lactating women are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satyajit Mohapatra
- Department of Pharmacology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Preethika Ananda
- Department of Pharmacology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Saswati Tripathy
- Department of OBG, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jorgensen SC, Lapinsky SE. Tocilizumab for coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy and lactation: a narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022; 28:51-57. [PMID: 34438068 PMCID: PMC8381634 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody that interrupts interleukin-6 signalling, reducing downstream effects on inflammation and the innate immune response. It was shown to reduce mortality in patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Pregnant and breastfeeding people were largely excluded from clinical trials and hence, the extent to which results can be applied to these populations is not clear. OBJECTIVES To synthesize published data on tocilizumab in pregnancy and lactation, highlight important knowledge gaps, and help inform clinical decision-making about tocilizumab's use in these populations with COVID-19. SOURCES PubMed was searched for studies evaluating tocilizumab in pregnancy and lactation for COVID-19 and other indications. Literature on pharmacokinetics and reproductive/fetal safety of monoclonal antibodies in general was also sought. The US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency guidance for the industry and regulatory approval documents were reviewed. CONTENT Published data on tocilizumab in pregnancy include 610 cases (n = 20 with COVID-19) together with seven mother-infant breastfeeding pairs. Higher rates of spontaneous abortion and premature birth have been reported compared with the general population, but multiple confounding variables limit interpretation. There is little data on tocilizumab exposure in the second and third trimesters when transplacental transport is highest. The effects of tocilizumab on the developing immune system are unclear. Pregnant patients with COVID-19 who received tocilizumab were often critically ill and corticosteroid use was uncommon. Neonatal follow up was limited. Tocilizumab appears to be compatible with breastfeeding. IMPLICATIONS Although the available data do not raise serious safety signals, they have significant limitations and are not sufficient to delineate the complete spectrum of potential adverse outcomes that may be associated with tocilizumab exposure during pregnancy and lactation. Diligent follow up and documentation of pregnancy outcomes will be important moving forward. A more effective regulatory framework to ensure equitable inclusion of pregnant people in research is clearly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C.J. Jorgensen
- Department of Pharmacy, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Corresponding author. Sarah C.J. Jorgensen, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Stephen E. Lapinsky
- Division of Respirology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada,Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nguyen H, Ahmed K, Luo W, Flint J, Giles I. A Systematic Review of the safety of non-TNF inhibitor biologic and targeted synthetic drugs in rheumatic disease in pregnancy. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021; 51:1205-1217. [PMID: 34689007 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite increasing evidence to support safe use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and other biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) during pre-conception/pregnancy, there remains a paucity of evidence regarding the safety and compatibility of other non-TNFi and novel targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs during pre-conception/pregnancy. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to determine the compatibility of these drugs in pre-conception, during pregnancy and post-partum period. METHOD Databases including; EMBASE, Pubmed (MEDLINE), and Cochrane were searched up to 23rd October 2020 to find relevant peer-reviewed papers, using keywords including; rheumatic disease, pregnancy, conception/pre-conception, lactation/breastfeeding, childhood and vaccination/infection, and commonly prescribed non-TNFi drugs and tsDMARDs. RESULTS Our search yielded 1483 papers that were screened independently by two authors, and 109 full-text papers were eligible for final analysis. These studies reported 1291 maternal pregnancies exposed to non-TNFi bDMARDs and tsDMARDs with known outcomes, including 721 live births, 219 spontaneous miscarriages and 27 congenital abnormalities. Paternal exposures in 174 pregnancies had reassuring outcomes. A total of 48 breast-fed infants were exposed to non-TNFi bDMARDs and no adverse events reported upon long-term follow-up. Fifteen infants exposed to bDMARDs received normal vaccination regimes, including live vaccines, and had normal developmental outcomes, without any complications or infections. CONCLUSION Overall, the findings are reassuring and do not suggest a cause for any major concerns or an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes for maternal or paternal exposures to non-TNFi bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. There were no major concerns for breastfeeding exposures to non-TNFi bDMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanh Nguyen
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, Rayne Institute, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | | | - Weike Luo
- University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | | | - Ian Giles
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, Rayne Institute, University College London (UCL), London, UK; Department of Rheumatology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Morel J, Tournadre A, Sellam J, Bouhnik Y, Cornec D, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Dieudé P, Goupille P, Kluger N, Lazaro E, Le Goff B, de Lédinghen V, Lequerré T, Nocturne G, Seror R, Truchetet ME, Verhoeven F, Pham T, Richez C. Practical Management of patients on anti-IL6R therapy: Practical guidelines drawn up by the Club Rhumatismes et Inflammation (CRI). Joint Bone Spine 2021; 88:105221. [PMID: 34183155 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques Morel
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Anne Tournadre
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jérémie Sellam
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Yoram Bouhnik
- Service de Gastro-entérologie, CHU Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Divi Cornec
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHRU La Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
| | | | - Philippe Dieudé
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | | | - Nicolas Kluger
- Dpt Dermatology, Helsinki, Finland & Service de Dermatologie, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Estibaliz Lazaro
- Service de Médecine interne, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | | | - Victor de Lédinghen
- Unité d'Hépatologie et transplantation hépatique, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | | | | | - Raphaèle Seror
- Service de Rhumatologie, Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | | | - Thao Pham
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pattanashetti L, Patil S, Nyamgouda S, Bhagiratha M, Gadad P. COVID-19 and pregnant women - An overview on diagnosis, treatment approach with limitation, and clinical management. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2021; 91. [PMID: 34121377 DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2021.1785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease or more popularly called COVID-19 is known to be caused by a novel coronavirus 2. The COVID-19 has been identified to be originated from Wuhan, Hubei, China. This pandemic started in December 2019, and since then it has spread across the world within a short period. The health and family welfare ministry of the Government of India reported 227,546 active, 9,997,272 discharged cases, and 150,114 deaths due to COVID-19 as of 06 January 2021. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) reports that the cumulative testing status of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) was 931,408 up to November 03, 2020. Currently, no specific anti-viral drug for COVID-19 management is recommended in the current scenario. Vulnerable populations such as pregnant women affected by COVID-19 infection need to be recognized and followed up for effective handling concerning morbidity and mortality. At present, very few case reports on COVID-19 infected pregnant women have been published in India and there is no proven exclusive treatment protocol. This article summarizes a review of signs and symptoms, etiopathogenesis, risk factors, diagnosis, and possible management of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women. This overview may be useful for health care providers for practical approach and limitation of drugs used in the current management and considers the choice of drugs with their special attention given to adverse effects to improvise maternal health, pregnancy, and birth outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laxmi Pattanashetti
- Department of Pharmacology, KLE College of Pharmacy, Hubli (A constituent unit of KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi), Karnataka.
| | - Santosh Patil
- Department of Pharmacology, KLE College of Pharmacy, Hubli (A constituent unit of KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi), Karnataka.
| | - Sanath Nyamgouda
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLE College of Pharmacy, Hubli (A constituent unit of KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka.
| | - Mahendrakumar Bhagiratha
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, KLE College of Pharmacy, Hubli (A constituent unit of KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka.
| | - Pramod Gadad
- Department of Pharmacology, KLE College of Pharmacy, Hubli (A constituent unit of KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi), Karnataka.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Perez-Garcia LF, Dolhain RJEM, Vorstenbosch S, Bramer W, van Puijenbroek E, Hazes JMW, Te Winkel B. The effect of paternal exposure to immunosuppressive drugs on sexual function, reproductive hormones, fertility, pregnancy and offspring outcomes: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2021; 26:961-1001. [PMID: 32743663 PMCID: PMC7600290 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information regarding the possible influence of immunosuppressive drugs on male sexual function and reproductive outcomes is scarce. Men diagnosed with immune-mediated diseases and a wish to become a father represent an important neglected population since they lack vital information to make balanced decisions about their treatment. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this research was to systematically review the literature for the influence of paternal immunosuppressive drug use on many aspects of male sexual health, such as sexual function, fertility, pregnancy outcomes and offspring health outcomes. SEARCH METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in the bibliographic databases: Embase (via Elsevier embase.com), MEDLINE ALL via Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Trials (via Wiley) and Web of Science Core Collection. Additionally, Google Scholar and the Clinical trial registries of Europe and the USA were searched. The databases were searched from inception until 31 August 2019. The searches combined keywords regarding male sexual function and fertility, pregnancy outcomes and offspring health with a list of immunosuppressive drugs. Studies were included if they were published in English and if they included original data on male human exposure to immunosuppressive drugs. A meta-analysis was not possible to perform due to the heterogeneity of the data. OUTCOMES A total of 5867 references were identified, amongst which we identified 161 articles fulfilling the eligibility criteria. Amongst these articles, 50 included pregnancy and offspring outcomes and 130 included sexual health outcomes. Except for large Scandinavian cohorts, most of the identified articles included a small number of participants. While a clear negative effect on sperm quality was evident for sulfasalazine and cyclophosphamide, a dubious effect was identified for colchicine, methotrexate and sirolimus. In three articles, exposure to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in patients diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis resulted in improved sperm quality. The information regarding pregnancy and offspring outcomes was scant but no large negative effect associated with paternal immunosuppressive drug exposure was reported. WIDER IMPLICATIONS Evidence regarding the safety of immunosuppressive drugs in men with a wish to become a father is inconclusive. The lack of standardisation on how to evaluate and report male sexual function, fertility and reproduction as study outcomes in men exposed to immunosuppressive drugs is an important contributor to this result. Future research on this topic is needed and should be preferably done using standardised methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L F Perez-Garcia
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R J E M Dolhain
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Vorstenbosch
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 5237 MH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - W Bramer
- Medical Library, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 5237 MH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J M W Hazes
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Te Winkel
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 5237 MH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Beltagy A, Aghamajidi A, Trespidi L, Ossola W, Meroni PL. Biologics During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding Among Women With Rheumatic Diseases: Safety Clinical Evidence on the Road. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:621247. [PMID: 34122062 PMCID: PMC8189556 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.621247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Females are generally more affected by autoimmune diseases, a fact that underlines the relationship with pregnancy and the safety of anti-rheumatic drugs in pregnancy and lactation. Biologic therapies are increasingly prescribed to treat and maintain remission in a significant number of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The experience with the use of biologics during gestation is extremely lacking because of the observational nature of the available studies and the difficulty in designing proper clinical trials in pregnancy. Among the studied biologics, more information was published on TNFα inhibitors and, in particular, on their potential passage through the placenta and impact on the fetus. Currently, a fragment of anti-TNFα monoclonal IgG, certolizumab pegol, is considered safe with almost no placental transfer. Subsequent observations are suggesting a comparable safety for the soluble TNFα receptor etanercept. Another biologic, eculizumab, the anti-C5a antibody used to treat complement-mediated microangiopathies, is also considered safe due to the unique engineered IgG2/4κ formulation that limits its passage through the placental barrier. Still, long-term data about children born to women treated with biologics in pregnancy are not attainable. Data on breastfeeding are currently available for several biologics. This article reviews the literature available about which drugs are considered safe during pregnancy and lactation, which are not, and on future prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmaa Beltagy
- Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Immunorheumatology Research Laboratory, Milan, Italy.,Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Azin Aghamajidi
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Laura Trespidi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fondazione Ca Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Wally Ossola
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fondazione Ca Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Pier Luigi Meroni
- Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Immunorheumatology Research Laboratory, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Giampreti A, Eleftheriou G, Gallo M, Butera R, Contessa G, Faraoni L, Sangiovanni A, Negri G, Falchi G, Bacis G. Medications prescriptions in COVID-19 pregnant and lactating women: the Bergamo Teratology Information Service experience during COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. J Perinat Med 2020; 48:1001-1007. [PMID: 33055313 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Objectives The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) outbreak in Italy, especially in Lombardy and Bergamo city, represented probably nowadays one of the first major clusters of COVID-19 in the world. The aim of this report is to describe the activity of Bergamo Teratology Information Service (TIS) in supporting the public and health-care personnel in case of drug prescriptions in suspected/confirmed COVID-19 pregnant and lactating patients during COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Methods All Bergamo TIS requests concerning COVID-19 pregnant and lactating women have been retrospectively evaluated from 1 March to 15 April 2020. Type of medications, drug's safety profile and compatibility with pregnancy and lactation are reported. Results Our service received information calls concerning 48 (9 pregnant, 35 lactating) patients. Among pregnant and lactating women, the requests of information were related to 16 and 60 drugs prescriptions respectively. More than half concerned drugs prescriptions during the first and second trimester (13/16) and during the first six months of lactation (37/60). Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were the most involved. Conclusions Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin at dosages used for COVID-19 may be considered compatible and reasonably safe either in pregnancy and lactation. Antivirals may be considered acceptable in pregnancy. During lactation lopinavir and ritonavir probably exhibit some supportive data from literature that darunavir and cobicistat do not. Tocilizumab may be considered for COVID-19 treatment because no increased malformation rate were observed until now. However caution may be advised because human data are limited and the potential risk of embryo-fetal toxicity cannot be excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Giampreti
- Bergamo Teratology Information Service, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24100 BergamoItaly
| | - Georgios Eleftheriou
- Bergamo Teratology Information Service, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24100 BergamoItaly
| | - Mariapina Gallo
- Bergamo Teratology Information Service, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24100 BergamoItaly
| | - Raffaella Butera
- Bergamo Teratology Information Service, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24100 BergamoItaly
| | - Gioia Contessa
- Bergamo Teratology Information Service, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24100 BergamoItaly
| | - Lorella Faraoni
- Bergamo Teratology Information Service, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24100 BergamoItaly
| | - Anna Sangiovanni
- Bergamo Teratology Information Service, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24100 BergamoItaly
| | - Giulia Negri
- Bergamo Teratology Information Service, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24100 BergamoItaly
| | - Giovanna Falchi
- Bergamo Teratology Information Service, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24100 BergamoItaly
| | - Giuseppe Bacis
- Bergamo Teratology Information Service, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24100 BergamoItaly
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ghalandari N, Dolhain RJEM, Hazes JMW, van Puijenbroek EP, Kapur M, Crijns HJMJ. Intrauterine Exposure to Biologics in Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review. Drugs 2020; 80:1699-1722. [PMID: 32852745 PMCID: PMC7568712 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-020-01376-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory autoimmune diseases are chronic diseases that often affect women of childbearing age. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the safety profile of medications used for management of inflammatory autoimmune diseases during pregnancy is important. However, in many cases the potential harmful effects of medications (especially biologics) during pregnancy (and lactation) on mother and child have not been fully identified. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to update the data on the occurrence of miscarriages and (major) congenital malformations when using biologics during pregnancy based on newly published articles. Additionally, we selected several different secondary outcomes that may be of interest for clinicians, especially information on adverse events in the use of a specific biologic during pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS A search was conducted from 1 January 2015 until 4 July 2019 in Embase.com, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar with specific search terms for each database. Selection of publications was based on title/abstract and followed by full text (double blinded, two researchers). An overview was made based on outcomes of interest. References of the included publications were reviewed to include and minimize the missing publications. RESULTS A total of 143 publications were included. The total number of cases ranged from nine for canakinumab to 4276 for infliximab. The rates of miscarriages and major congenital malformations did not show relevant differences from those rates in the general population. CONCLUSION Despite limitations to our study, no major safety issues were reported and no trend could be identified in the reported malformations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Ghalandari
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB), Graadt van Roggenweg 500, 3531 AH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Academic Center of Inflammunity, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - R J E M Dolhain
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Academic Center of Inflammunity, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J M W Hazes
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB), Graadt van Roggenweg 500, 3531 AH, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Academic Center of Inflammunity, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E P van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - M Kapur
- Utrecht University of Medical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H J M J Crijns
- Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB), Graadt van Roggenweg 500, 3531 AH, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
D'Souza R, Wuebbolt D, Andrejevic K, Ashraf R, Nguyen V, Zaffar N, Rotstein D, Wyne A. Pregnancy and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder - Reciprocal Effects and Practical Recommendations: A Systematic Review. Front Neurol 2020; 11:544434. [PMID: 33178102 PMCID: PMC7596379 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.544434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system characterized by severe, antibody-mediated astrocyte loss with secondary demyelination and axonal damage, predominantly targeting optic nerves and the spinal cord. Recent publications have alluded to increased disease activity during pregnancy, and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in patients with NMOSD. Our objective was to systematically review published literature to help counsel and manage women with NMOSD contemplating pregnancy. Methods: We searched five databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE, for English-language publications describing pregnancies in women with NMOSD. Article selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using Joanna Briggs' critical appraisal tool for case reports and case series, were performed in duplicate. Pooled incidences were calculated where possible, and a narrative summary was provided. Results: Of 2,118 identified titles, 22 case reports and seven case series, representing 595 pregnancies in 389 women, were included. The mean maternal age was 28.12 ± 5.19 years. At least 20% of cases were first diagnosed during pregnancy. There were no maternal deaths. Pooled estimates for clinical outcomes could not be obtained due to inadequate reporting. NMOSD-related disability and relapses increased considerably during pregnancy and especially in the immediate postpartum period. Although a high proportion of early pregnancy losses were reported, an association with disease activity or therapeutic interventions could not be established. Apart from one publication which reported an increased risk of preeclampsia, there was no increase in adverse obstetric outcomes including preterm birth, fetal growth restriction or congenital malformations. Initial attacks and relapses were successfully managed with oral or intravenous corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, and refractory cases with immunoglobulin, plasma exchange and immunoadsorption. Conclusion: Increased NMOSD-related disability and relapses during pregnancy the postpartum period may respond to aggressive management with corticosteroids and immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, which are safely administered during pregnancy and lactation. Emerging safety data on monoclonal antibodies during pregnancy, make these attractive options, while intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange and immunoadsorption can be safely used to treat severe relapses. The complex interplay between NMOSD and pregnancy outcomes would be best understood through prospective analysis of data collected through an international registry. Disclosure: Dalia Rotstein has served as a consultant or speaker for Alexion and Roche. She has received research support from Roche Canada. Rohan D'Souza has served as a consultant and speaker for Ferring Canada Inc and Ferring Global Inc, on topics unrelated to this manuscript. The other authors have no relevant relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan D'Souza
- Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danielle Wuebbolt
- Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Katarina Andrejevic
- Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rizwana Ashraf
- Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vanessa Nguyen
- Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nusrat Zaffar
- Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, Division of Paediatric Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dalia Rotstein
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ahraaz Wyne
- General Internal and Obstetrical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an update about the impact of infections in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), from the analysis of the role of infections in pregnant women without ARDs, to the identification of maternal-fetal infections and their role in the maternal-fetal outcome of women with ARDs. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies indicate that patients with ARDs and pregnancy are also susceptible to presenting infections of varying degrees, including serious infections, which contribute to the morbidity and mortality observed in pregnancy and postpartum of these patients.Any type of infectious agent will interact with a hormonal, immunological and metabolic environments modified by ARD, treatments, and by the changes inherent in pregnancy. Therefore, infections in the pregnancy of patients with ARDs should be considered as a risk factor for an unfavorable maternal-fetal outcome. SUMMARY The recognition of infections in the pregnancy of ARDs as a risk factor is the first step to prevent, identify, and treat them in a timely manner, and thus contribute to the favorable course of pregnancy in these patients. Patients with ARDs and major organ involvement, use of high doses of steroids, immunosuppressant and biological therapies, adolescence, and obesity are populations susceptible to developing infections.
Collapse
|
20
|
Mao-Draayer Y, Thiel S, Mills EA, Chitnis T, Fabian M, Katz Sand I, Leite MI, Jarius S, Hellwig K. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and pregnancy: therapeutic considerations. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:154-170. [PMID: 32080393 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0313-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are a type of neurological autoimmune disease characterized by attacks of CNS inflammation that are often severe and predominantly affect the spinal cord and optic nerve. The majority of individuals with NMOSD are women, many of whom are of childbearing age. Although NMOSD are rare, several small retrospective studies and case reports have indicated that pregnancy can worsen disease activity and might contribute to disease onset. NMOSD disease activity seems to negatively affect pregnancy outcomes. Moreover, some of the current NMOSD treatments are known to pose risks to the developing fetus and only limited safety data are available for others. Here, we review published studies regarding the relationship between pregnancy outcomes and NMOSD disease activity. We also assess the risks associated with using disease-modifying therapies for NMOSD during the course of pregnancy and breastfeeding. On the basis of the available evidence, we offer recommendations regarding the use of these therapies in the course of pregnancy planning in individuals with NMOSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Mao-Draayer
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Graduate Program in Immunology, Program in Biomedical Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sandra Thiel
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Elizabeth A Mills
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tanuja Chitnis
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michelle Fabian
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ilana Katz Sand
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Isabel Leite
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sven Jarius
- Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hellwig
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
De Lorenzo R, Ramirez GA, Punzo D, Lorioli L, Rovelli R, Canti V, Barera G, Rovere-Querini P. Neonatal outcomes of children born to mothers on biological agents during pregnancy: State of the art and perspectives. Pharmacol Res 2019; 152:104583. [PMID: 31816434 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are used in pregnant patients with rheumatic diseases. Long-term follow-up data about newborns exposed to bDMARDs during pregnancy are however scarce. Here we summarize the published evidence and available recommendations for use of bDMARDs during pregnancy. We analyse clinical features at birth and at follow-up of 84 children, including: 16 consecutive children born to mothers with autoimmune diseases exposed to bDMARDs in utero; 32 children born to mothers with autoimmune diseases who did not receive bDMARDs; 36 children born to healthy mothers. In our monocentric cohort, children born to mothers with autoimmune diseases had lower gestational age at birth compared to those born to healthy mothers, independently of exposure to bDMARDs. At multivariate analysis, prematurity was an independent predictor of the need for antibiotic treatment, but not for hospitalisation or neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) stay during the neonatal period. Exposure to bDMARDs during pregnancy does not seem to interfere with post-natal development up to infancy. Prospective studies are needed in larger cohorts of pregnant patients to confirm that bDMARDs do not have a negative impact on psychomotor achievements in newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca De Lorenzo
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe A Ramirez
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Punzo
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Lorioli
- Unit of Paediatrics, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosanna Rovelli
- Unit of Paediatrics, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Canti
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Graziano Barera
- Unit of Paediatrics, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Rovere-Querini
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Moriyama M, Wada Y, Minamoto T, Kondo M, Honda M, Murakawa Y. Unexpectedly lower proportion of placental transferred tocilizumab relative to whole immunoglobulin G: a case report. Scand J Rheumatol 2019; 49:165-166. [PMID: 31436129 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2019.1639821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Moriyama
- Department of Rheumatology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Y Wada
- Internal Medicine III, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - T Minamoto
- Department of Obstetrics, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - M Kondo
- Department of Rheumatology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - M Honda
- Department of Rheumatology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Y Murakawa
- Department of Rheumatology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.,Internal Medicine III, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Soh MC, Moretto M. The use of biologics for autoimmune rheumatic diseases in fertility and pregnancy. Obstet Med 2019; 13:5-13. [PMID: 32284726 DOI: 10.1177/1753495x19841799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In an age where autoimmune rheumatic diseases are successfully managed with biologics, their discontinuation in pregnancy is inadvisable without careful forethought; maternal disease activity is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, which has long-term implications for both mother and offspring. We aim to provide clinicians with the necessary tools to facilitate decision-making - when a biologic should be used, when it can be discontinued in pregnancy if appropriate. The pathophysiology of these biologic molecules and their effect on fertility, pregnancy and parturition are discussed. A summary of the 2016 international guidelines (European League Against Rheumatism and British Society in Rheumatology) on biologics in pregnancy has been tabulated; more recent publications are discussed in depth. Data on transplacental-transfer ratios and breastmilk excretion rates are also included. Biologic effects on organogenesis, their implications for the exposed infant in terms of infection risks and vaccination requirements are included, and future directions for research proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- May Ching Soh
- Department of Rheumatology, Tauranga Hospital, Bay of Plenty District Health Board, Tauranga, New Zealand.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elizabeth Rothwell Building, Waikato Hospital, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.,Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Marcelo Moretto
- Department of Gynaecology, Hospital São Lucas da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Clínica Generar-Human Reproduction, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Challenges in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 2019; 18:706-713. [PMID: 31059844 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by a heterogeneous clinical response to the different treatments. Some patients are difficult to treat and do not reach the treatment targets as clinical remission or low disease activity. Known negative prognostic factors, such as the presence of auto-antiantibodies and joint erosion, the presence of a genetic profile, comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations, pregnancy or a pregnancy wish may concur to the treatment failure. In this review we aimed at identify difficult to treat RA patients and define the optimal therapeutic and environmental targets. Genetic markers of severity such as HLA-DRB1, TRAF1, PSORS1C1 and microRNA 146a are differently associated with joint damage; other gene polymorphisms seem to be associated with response to biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). The presence of comorbidities and/or extra-articular manifestations may influence the therapeutic choice; overweight and obese patients are less responsive to TNF inhibitors. In this context the patient profiling can improve the clinical outcome. Targeting different pathways, molecules, and cells involved in the pathogenesis of RA may in part justify the lack response of some patients. An overview of the future therapeutic targets, including bDMARDs (inhibitors of IL-6, GM-CSF, matrix metalloproteinases, chemokines) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (filgotinib, ABT-494, pefacitinib, decernotinib), and environmental targets is addressed. Environmental factors, such as diet and cigarette smoke, may influence susceptibility to autoimmune diseases and interfere with inflammatory pathways. Mediterranean diet, low salt intake, cocoa, curcumin, and physical activity seem to show beneficial effects, however studies of dose finding, safety and efficacy in RA need to be performed.
Collapse
|
25
|
Gerosa M, Argolini LM, Artusi C, Chighizola CB. The use of biologics and small molecules in pregnant patients with rheumatic diseases. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2018; 11:987-998. [PMID: 30227748 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1525293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biological agents have radically changed the prognosis of rheumatic patients. Current evidence demonstrates that tight disease control during pregnancy is mandatory to minimize adverse outcome risk. As the new therapeutic tools are pivotal to maintain appropriate disease activity, it is timely to review available evidence about the safety of biologics and small molecules in pregnancy. Areas covered: A comprehensive literature review has been performed, reporting available data about the passage into breast milk, rate of pregnancy loss and fetal malformations, and long-term complications due to in utero exposure to biological agents and small molecules. Expert commentary: Data about the safety of agents against tumor necrosis factor in pregnancy are reassuring. Even rituximab, tocilizumab, belimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and abatacept have not been associated with an increased rate of fetal abnormalities or adverse pregnancy outcome. Experience with small molecules is too small to draw any conclusion. Even if further data are warranted to define the possible long-term effects of in utero biologic exposure on the infant immune system development, it is reasonable to speculate that in the next future the use of biologics during pregnancy will continue to expand, at least when maternal benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Gerosa
- a Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health , University of Milan, Division of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Istituto Gaetano Pini - CTO , Milan , Italy
| | - Lorenza Maria Argolini
- a Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health , University of Milan, Division of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Istituto Gaetano Pini - CTO , Milan , Italy
| | - Carolina Artusi
- b Division of Clinical Rheumatology , ASST Istituto Gaetano Pini - CTO , Milan , Italy
| | - Cecilia Beatrice Chighizola
- c Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health , University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Experimental Laboratory of Immunorheumatological Researches, Istituto Auxologico Italiano , Milan , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gerosa M, Schioppo T, Meroni PL. Challenges and treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis during pregnancy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2016; 17:1539-47. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1197204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
27
|
Förger F, Villiger PM. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis during pregnancy: present and future. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2016; 12:937-44. [DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2016.1184973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|