Principe, intérêts et limites de la méthode des choix discrets pour la révélation des préférences en santé

A pilot study on preferences from surgeons to deal with an innovative customized and connected knee prosthesis - A discret choice experiment

Background

To address the increasing global demand for Total Knee Arthroplasty and reduce the need for revisions, several technologies combining 3D planning and artificial intelligence have emerged. These innovations aim to enhance customization, improve component positioning accuracy and precision. The integration of these advancements paves the way for the development of personalized and connected knee implant.

Questions/purposes

These groundbreaking advancements may necessitate changes in surgical practices. Hence, it is important to comprehend surgeons' intentions in integrating these technologies into their routine procedures. Our study aims to assess how surgeons' preferences will affect the acceptability of using this new implant and associated technologies within the entire care chain.

Methods

We employed a Discrete Choice Experiment, a predictive technique mirroring real-world healthcare decisions, to assess surgeons' trade-off evaluations and preferences.

Results

A total of 90 experienced surgeons, performing a significant number of procedures annually (mostly over 51) answered. Analysis indicates an affinity for technology but limited interest in integrating digital advancements like preoperative software and robotics. However, they are receptive to practice improvements and considering the adoption of future sensors.

Conclusions

In conclusion, surgeons prefer customized prostheses via augmented reality, accepting extra cost. Embedded sensor technology is deemed premature by them.

Attributes for a discrete-choice experiment on preferences of patients for oncology pharmacy consultations

PURPOSE

To ensure the safe use of oral anticancer drugs, oncology pharmacy consultations (OPCs) have been established in France. They are conditioned by the needs, expectations, and involvement of the patients in their care. Thus, it is essential to elicit their preferences. The discrete-choice experiment (DCE) is a method recommended by the ISPOR for such a task. The "selection and validation of attributes and their values" step is fundamental in this process. In this context, the aim of this study was to present our research approach to identify and validate the attributes that characterize an OPC and their values.

METHODS

Due to the lack of relevant published data in the literature, the focus-group method was used in accordance with good research practices for the application of conjoint-analysis of the ISPOR. The two-round Delphi method was used to validate the attributes and their values identified by the focus-group method.

RESULTS

The focus-group method enabled identification of nine attributes. Thirty-seven healthcare professionals at a national level, including 30 pharmacists and seven physicians, were selected to take part in the Delphi procedure. Seven attributes (frequency, planification, operation mode, duration, content, written support, and report) and their values were thus validated.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, the next step will be to elicit patient preferences for OPCs and to then shed light on the issues of pharmaceutical support for patients by comparing their preferences with those of informal caregivers and, in particular, those of the healthcare professionals involved in their care.

[Determinants of the choice of healthcare worker positions in rural areas in Burkina Faso.]

INTRODUCTION

In 2014, in Burkina Faso, more than 60% of healthcare workers were working in urban areas to the detriment of rural areas. The two largest cities concentrated the majority of healthcare workers, while these cities represent only 10% of the population. This study was designed to identify incentive strategies that could enable more equitable deployment of healthcare workers.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was carried out in 2016 in six health regions in Burkina Faso. Key informant interviews were conducted to determine the factors influencing the choice of jobs. The results were used to construct job packages useful for the discrete choice experiment survey.Levels of preferences for 1,173 health workers for incentive packages linked to the job were explored by means of electronic questionnaire data collection.Sawtooth software was used to develop and randomize job pairing preferences proposed to healthcare workers. STATA14 software was used for mixed-logit analysis.

RESULTS

The determinants to promote more equitable deployment and maintenance of health workers in their workplace include access to good accommodation, on-job training, responsibility, and improved salaries.In terms of acceptability of deployment, more than 75% (p-value < 0.001) of workers would agree to be redeployed in rural areas if the above conditions were met.

CONCLUSION

Adequate and sustainable human resource development strategies should be set up by policymakers in order to improve the maintenance of healthcare workers in rural areas.

"Doctor, can I have less frequent injection with highly efficient treatment?" A patient centered study using an electronic choice-based conjoint analysis (ePRO) to assess real world preferences regarding erythropoiesis stimulating agent to treat anaemia in chronic kidney disease (PERCEPOLIS study)

OBJECTIVES

Patient's perception analysis appears recently in numerous studies. Conjoint analysis has been used extensively by market researchers for studying how people value the characteristics of products and services. This technique was used in a clinical study to describe perceptions and preferences of anaemic patients suffering from chronic kidney disease not on dialysis (CKDnd), regarding erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA).

METHODS

PERCEPOLIS was a French multicenter prospective non-interventional study designed to describe the relative importance of ESA attributes according to CKDnD patients. Patients fulfilled questionnaires using an electronic device (digital tablet) at baseline and after 6 months under continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) treatment. Choice-based conjoint (CBC) questionnaires were developed with multiple components: 7 ESA attributes (2 or 3 levels per attribute), 2 partial profiles per task (2 out of the 7 attributes), and 7 tasks per questionnaire. Analyses were performed according to previous ESA treatment or not.

RESULTS

From 789 analyzed patients, 433 non ESA-naive patients were more than 80% to declare treatment efficacy as the most important expectative in ESA choice process (direct question) but CBC analyses revealed that frequency of injections was more crucial (relative mean weight: ∼30% versus ∼20% for efficacy). Pain at injection site and haemoglobin not exceeding the recommended target were confirmed as important criteria for patients (relative mean weights: ∼15%). No new or unexplained safety signals were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Using CBC design for the first time in a non-interventional ESA study with an electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) in an elderly population, these data showed that monthly injections and treatment efficacy were key patients' expectations relative to ESAs. CERA efficacy to maintain stable haemoglobin within the recommended range was confirmed in real-life conditions.

[Preferences of general practitioners in metropolitan France with regard to the delegation of medico-administrative tasks to secretaries assisting medico-social workers: Study in conjoint analysis]

BACKGROUND

A general practitioner's office is an economic unit where task delegation is an essential component in improving the quality and performance of work.

AIM

To classify the preferences of general practitioners regarding the delegation of medical-administrative tasks to assistant medical-social secretaries.

METHOD

Conjoint analysis was applied to a random sample of 175 general practitioners working in metropolitan France. Ten scenarios were constructed based on seven attributes: training for medical secretaries, logistical support during the consultation, delegation of management planning, medical records, accounting, maintenance, and taking initiative on the telephone. A factorial design was used to reduce the number of scenarios. Physicians' socio-demographic variables were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred and three physicians responded and the analysis included 90 respondents respecting the transitivity of preferences hypothesis. Perceived difficulty was scored 2.8 out of 5. The high rates of respondents (59%; 95% CI [51.7-66.3]) and transitivity (87.5%; 95% CI [81.1-93.9]) showed physicians' interest in this topic. Delegation of tasks concerning management planning (OR=2.91; 95% CI [2.40-13.52]) and medical records (OR=1.88; 95% CI [1.56-2.27]) were the two most important attributes for physicians. The only variable for which the choice of a secretary was not taken into account was logistical support.

CONCLUSION

This is a first study examining the choices of general practitioners concerning the delegation of tasks to assistants. These findings are helpful to better understand the determinants of practitioners' choices in delegating certain tasks or not. They reveal doctors' desire to limit their ancillary tasks in order to favor better use of time for "medical" tasks. They also expose interest for training medical secretaries and widening their field of competence, suggesting the emergence of a new professional occupation that could be called "medical assistant".