Survival and neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with and without mechanical circulatory support

Galectin-3 Predicts Long-Term Risk of Cerebral Disability and Mortality in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors

BACKGROUND

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with high mortality and cerebral disability in survivors. Current models of risk prediction and survival are mainly based on resuscitation duration. We examined the prognostic value of circulating biomarkers in predicting mortality and severe cerebral disability for OHCA survivors, alongside traditional clinical risk indicators.

METHODS

Biomarkers including BNP, troponin I, and galectin-3 were measured at hospital admission in resuscitated OHCA patients. Prognostic significance for mortality and cerebral disability involving circulating biomarkers, resuscitation duration, demographics, and laboratory and clinical characteristics was examined via univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. The incremental prognostic value of the index covariates was examined through model diagnostics, focusing on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's concordance statistic (c-statistic).

RESULTS

In a combinatorial analysis of 144 OHCA survivors (median follow-up 5.7 years (IQR 2.9-6.6)), BNP, galectin-3, arterial pH, and resuscitation time were significant predictors of all-cause death and severe cerebral disability, whereas troponin I levels were not. Multivariate regression, adjusting for BNP, arterial pH, and resuscitation time, identified galectin-3 as an independent predictor of long-term mortality. Multiple linear regression models also confirmed galectin-3 as the strongest predictor of cerebral disability. The incorporation of galectin-3 into models for predicting mortality and cerebral disability enhanced fit and discrimination, demonstrating the incremental value of galectin-3 beyond traditional risk predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Galectin-3 is a significant, independent long-term risk predictor of cerebral disability and mortality in OHCA survivors. Incorporating galectin-3 into current risk stratification models may enhance early prognostication and guide targeted clinical interventions.

Rare Complication of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-Liver Injury

Background and Objectives: Liver injury is a rare complication of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Correct and early diagnosis and treatment are essential. The clinical signs of injury may be masked by the cardiac arrest. We present a single-centre retrospective observational study of traumatic liver injury after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the patients treated for liver injury after cardiopulmonary resuscitation was conducted. Demographic data, the cause of resuscitation, the duration of restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and the surgical approach were analysed. Results: We have treated nine patients with severe liver injury after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The diagnosis was made on the basis of cardiopulmonary instability, a fall in the erythrocyte count in eight cases, and was confirmed by CT or ultrasound examination. The last one was diagnosed accidentally on MR. Surgery, in cases of unstable patients, was followed immediately after a diagnosis. We combined liver sutures and intra-abdominal packing with a planned second-look surgery. Five of the nine patients survived. Conclusions: Liver injury after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is rare and is associated with high mortality. The recurrence of cardiopulmonary instability and/or a low or falling red blood cell count are the main signs of this injury. Bedside ultrasound and CT scans are the most important methods to confirm the diagnosis. The rule of surgical repair is the same as in all liver injuries, regardless of aetiology. The key factors for survival include early diagnosis, together with the length of restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Association between early airway intervention in the pre-hospital setting and outcomes in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients: A post-hoc analysis of the Target Temperature Management-2 (TTM2) trial

INTRODUCTION

Airway management is a critical component of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation. The primary aim of this study was to describe pre-hospital airway management in adult patients post-OHCA. Secondary aims were to investigate whether tracheal intubation (TI) versus use of supraglottic airway device (SGA) was associated with patients' outcomes, including ventilator-free days within 26 days of randomization, 6 months neurological outcome and mortality.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of the Target Temperature Management-2 (TTM2) trial conducted in 13 countries, including adult patients with OHCA and return of spontaneous circulation, with data available on pre-hospital airway management. A multivariate logistic regression model with backward stepwise selection was employed to assess whether TI versus SGA was associated with outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 1900 TTM2 trial patients, 1702 patients (89.5%) were included, with a mean age of 64 years (Standard Deviation, SD = 13.53); 79.1% were males. Pre-hospital airway management was SGA in 484 (28.4%), and TI in 1218 (71.6%) patients. At hospital admission, 87.8% of patients with SGA and 98.5% with TI were mechanically ventilated (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, TI in comparison with SGA was not independently associated with an increase in ventilator-free days within 26 days of randomization, improved neurological outcomes, or decreased mortality. The hazard ratio for mortality with TI vs. SGA was 1.06, 95%Confidence Interval (CI) 0.88-1.28, p = 0.54.

CONCLUSIONS

In the multicentre randomized TTM2-trial including patients with OHCA, most patients received prehospital endotracheal intubation to manage their airway. The choice of pre-hospital airway device was not independently associated with patient clinical outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02908308.

Mortality Predictors and Neurological Outcomes Following Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (eCPR): A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) offers cardiorespiratory support to patients experiencing cardiac arrest. However, this technology is not yet considered a standard treatment, and the evidence on eCPR criteria and its association with survival and good neurological outcomes remains scarce. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the overall mortality and risk factors for mortality. Moreover, we provide a comparison of demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of patients, including neurological outcomes and adverse events during support.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received eCPR and were admitted between January 2008 and June 2022 at a tertiary and trauma one-level university hospital in Austria.

RESULTS

In total, 90 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria, 41 (46%) patients survived until intensive care unit discharge, and 39 (43%) survived until hospital discharge. The most common cause of cardiac arrest was myocardial infarction (42, 47%), and non-shockable initial rhythm was reported in 50 patients (56%). Of 33 survivors with documented outcomes, 30 had a good recovery as measured with Cerebral Performance Category score, 2 suffered severe disability, and 1 remained in a persistent vegetative state. Finally, multivariate analysis identified asystole as initial rhythm (HR 2.88, p = 0.049), prolonged CPR (HR 1.02, p = 0.043), and CPR on the weekend (HR 2.57, p = 0.032) as factors with a higher risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

eCPR-related decision-making could be additionally supported by the comprehension of the reported risk factors for mortality and severe disability. Further studies are needed to elucidate the impact of peri-arrest variables on outcomes, aiming to improve patient selection.

The short- and mid-term mortality trends in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: insights from a 5-year multicenter retrospective study in Taiwan

Background

The survival trend and factors influencing short- and mid-term mortality in Asian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors should be elucidated. We performed survival analyses on days 3 and 30, hypothesizing decreased survival rates within the initial 3 days post-resuscitation. Additionally, variables linked to mortality at these two timepoints were examined.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis on adult nontraumatic OHCA survivors admitted to the National Taiwan University Hospital and its branches between 2017 and 2021. We collected the following variables from the NTUH-Integrative Medical Database: basic characteristics, cardiopulmonary resuscitation events, inotrope administration, and post-resuscitation management. The outcomes included 3- and 30-day mortality. Subgroup analyses with the Kaplan-Meier method explored the survival probability of the OHCA survivors and assessed differences in cumulative survival among subgroups. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval.

Results

Of the 967 survivors, 273 (28.2%) and 604 (62.5%) died within 3 and 30 days, respectively. The 30-day survival curve after OHCA showed an uneven decline, with the most significant decrease within the first 3 days of admission. Various risk factors influence mortality at 3- and 30-day intervals. Although increased age, noncardiac etiology, and prolonged low-flow time increased mortality risks, bystander CPR, targeted temperature management, and continuous renal replacement therapy were associated with reduced mortality at 3- and 30-day timeframes.

Conclusion

Survival declined in most OHCA survivors within 3 days post-resuscitation. The risk factors associated with mortality at 3- and 30-day intervals varied in this population.

Predictors and rate of survival after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health concern and encloses a wide spectrum of causes. The purpose of this study is to assess predictors and rate of survival at hospital discharge and long-term in the setting of OHCA. The secondary endpoint is to compare OHCA-survival outcomes of presumed ischemic versus non ischemic cause.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort was conducted on 318 consecutive patients admitted for OHCA at Civilian Hospitals of Colmar between 2010 and 2019. Data concerning baseline characteristics, EKG, biological parameters, and coronary angiograms were collected. We observed the living status (alive or dead) of each of study's participants by March 2023.

RESULTS

The observed survival rate was 34.3 % at hospital discharge and 26.7 % at 7.1-year follow up. The mean age of study population was 63 ± 16 years and 32.7 % were women. 65.7 % of OHCA-patients underwent coronary angiography that revealed a significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in half of study participants. Primary angioplasty was performed in 43.4 % of study population. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in those with RBBB (83.7 % vs. 62.5 %, p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (84.2 % vs. 59.9 %, p < 0.001), arterial hypertension (72.2 % vs. 57.7 %, p = 0.007), peripheral arterial disease (79.2 % vs. 52.2 %, p = 0.031) whereas it was lower in case of anterior STEMI (43.9 % vs 71.4 %, p < 0.001), presence of obstructive CAD (52.2 % vs. 79.2 %, p < 0.001), primary angioplasty performance (48.6 % vs. 78.9 %, p < 0.001), initial shockable rhythm (43.8 % vs. 88.6 %, p < 0.001), initial chest pain (49.4 % vs. 71.5 %, p < 0.001). After adjusting on covariates, the Cox model only identified an initial shockable rhythm as independent predictor of survival at hospital discharge [HR = 0.185, 95 %CI (0.085-0.404), p < 0.001] and 7-year follow up [HR = 0.201, 95 %CI (0.082-0.492), p < 0.001]. The Kaplan-Meier and log Rank test showed a difference in survival outcomes between OHCA with versus without CAD (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of OHCA-survivors is small despite the development of emergency health care system. Initial shockable rhythm is the strong predictor of survival. OHCA of presumed coronary cause is associated with a better long-term survival outcome.

[Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation-An orientation]

Both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are associated with a high mortality. In the past survival advantages for patients could be achieved by optimizing the chain of rescue and postresuscitation treatment; however, for patients with refractory cardiac arrest, there have so far been few promising treatment options. For selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest who do not achieve return of spontaneous circulation with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), extracorporeal (e)CPR using venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is an option to improve the probability of survival. This article describes the technical features, important aspects of treatment, and the current data situation on eCPR in patients with in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and immediate invasive assessment in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a long-term follow-up of the Prague OHCA trial

BACKGROUND

Randomized data evaluating the impact of the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) approach on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are lacking. The objective of this follow-up study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of the ECPR-based versus CCPR approach.

METHODS

The Prague OHCA trial was a single-center, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with witnessed refractory OHCA of presumed cardiac origin, without return of spontaneous circulation, were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene to conventional CPR (CCPR) or an ECPR-based approach (intra-arrest transport, ECPR if ROSC is not achieved prehospital and immediate invasive assessment).

RESULTS

From March 2013 to October 2020, 264 patients were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene, and 256 patients were enrolled. Long-term follow-up was performed 5.3 (interquartile range 3.8-7.2) years after initial randomization and was completed in 255 of 256 patients (99.6%). In total, 34/123 (27.6%) patients in the ECPR-based group and 26/132 (19.7%) in the CCPR group were alive (log-rank P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the neurological outcome, survival after hospital discharge, risk of hospitalization, major cardiovascular events and quality of life. Of long-term survivors, 1/34 (2.9%) in the ECPR-based arm and 1/26 (3.8%) in the CCPR arm had poor neurological outcome (both patients had a cerebral performance category score of 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with refractory OHCA, the ECPR-based approach significantly improved long-term survival. There were no differences in the neurological outcome, major cardiovascular events and quality of life between the groups, but the trial was possibly underpowered to detect a clinically relevant difference in these outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511666, Registered 19 January 2012.

Neurological Resilience in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa Following Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric disorder with metabolic abnormalities. Prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is predicted to result in death and poor neurological outcomes. This report describes the case of a patient with AN who had an unexpectedly favorable outcome after prolonged CPR. A 12-year-old female with AN presented to the emergency department, requiring intubation due to worsening consciousness and respiratory distress. Refractory hypotension led to cardiac arrest. After 135 minutes of CPR, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (EMCO) was started, and the patient was treated for post-resuscitation management, refeeding syndrome, and sepsis. The cardiac function gradually improved, the patient was weaned from EMCO eight days after admission, and the patient was extubated 30 days after admission. The patient maintained a good central nervous system function. AN patients tend to be youngsters and have a lower metabolism, which may be associated with a favorable neurological prognosis after prolonged CPR.

Left-Ventricular Unloading With Impella During Refractory Cardiac Arrest Treated With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is the implementation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) during refractory cardiac arrest. The role of left-ventricular (LV) unloading with Impella in addition to VA-ECMO ("ECMELLA") remains unclear during ECPR. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize patients with ECPR receiving LV unloading and to compare in-hospital mortality between ECMELLA and VA-ECMO during ECPR.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and abstract websites of the three largest cardiology societies (American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and European Society of Cardiology).

STUDY SELECTION

Observational studies with adult patients with refractory cardiac arrest receiving ECPR with ECMELLA or VA-ECMO until July 2023 according to the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist.

DATA EXTRACTION

Patient and treatment characteristics and in-hospital mortality from 13 study records at 32 hospitals with a total of 1014 ECPR patients. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI were computed with the Mantel-Haenszel test using a random-effects model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Seven hundred sixty-two patients (75.1%) received VA-ECMO and 252 (24.9%) ECMELLA. Compared with VA-ECMO, the ECMELLA group was comprised of more patients with initial shockable electrocardiogram rhythms (58.6% vs. 49.3%), acute myocardial infarctions (79.7% vs. 51.5%), and percutaneous coronary interventions (79.0% vs. 47.5%). VA-ECMO alone was more frequently used in pulmonary embolism (9.5% vs. 0.7%). Age, rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and low-flow times were similar between both groups. ECMELLA support was associated with reduced odds of mortality (OR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.30-0.91]) and higher odds of good neurologic outcome (OR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.17-4.22]) compared with VA-ECMO support alone. ECMELLA therapy was associated with numerically increased but not significantly higher complication rates. Primary results remained robust in multiple sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

ECMELLA support was predominantly used in patients with acute myocardial infarction and VA-ECMO for pulmonary embolism. ECMELLA support during ECPR might be associated with improved survival and neurologic outcome despite higher complication rates. However, indications and frequency of ECMELLA support varied strongly between institutions. Further scientific evidence is urgently required to elaborate standardized guidelines for the use of LV unloading during ECPR.

[Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation-An orientation]

Both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are associated with a high mortality. In the past survival advantages for patients could be achieved by optimizing the chain of rescue and postresuscitation treatment; however, for patients with refractory cardiac arrest, there have so far been few promising treatment options. For selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest who do not achieve return of spontaneous circulation with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), extracorporeal (e)CPR using venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is an option to improve the probability of survival. This article describes the technical features, important aspects of treatment, and the current data situation on eCPR in patients with in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Around the world, survival rates after cardiac arrest range between <14% for in-hospital (IHCA) and <10% for outof- hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This situation could potentially be improved by using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), i.e. by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

METHODS

A selective literature search of Pubmed and Embase using the searching string ((ECMO) OR (ECLS)) AND (ECPR)) was carried out in February 2023 to prepare an up-to-date review of published trials comparing the outcomes of ECPR with those of conventional CPR.

RESULTS

Out of 573 initial results, 12 studies were included in this review, among them three randomized controlled trials comparing ECPR with CPR, involving a total of 420 patients. The survival rates for ECPR ranged from 20% to 43% for OHCA and 20% to 30.4% for IHCA. Most of the publications were associated with a high degree of bias and a low level of evidence.

CONCLUSION

ECPR can potentially improve survival rates after cardiac arrest compared to conventional CPR when used in experienced, high-volume centers in highly selected patients (young age, initial shockable rhythm, witnessed cardiac arrest, therapy-refractory high-quality CPR). No general recommendation for the use of ECPR can be issued at present.

Long-term survival, functional capacity and quality of life after refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with mechanical circulatory support

Introduction

Studies on long-term outcomes after refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate long-term neurologically intact survival, functional capacity and quality of life after refractory OHCA treated with MCS.

Methods

This was a follow-up study of survivors after refractory OHCA treated with MCS. Follow-up examinations comprised clinical assessment with transthoracic echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX). Neurological and cognitive screening was evaluated with the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA test). A good neurological outcome was defined as CPC 1 or CPC 2. Health-related quality of life was measured by questionnaires (Short Form-36 (SF-36)).

Results

A total of 101 patients with refractory OHCA were treated with MCS at Aarhus University Hospital between 2015 and 2019. The total low-flow time was median 105 min [IQR, 94-123] minutes. The hospital discharge rate was 27%. At a mean follow-up time of 4.8 years ± 1.6 (range 2.8-6.1 years), 21 patients remained alive of whom 15 consented to participate in the present study. Good neurological outcome with CPC 1-2 was found in 93% (14/15) patients. No severe cognitive function was discovered; mean MoCA score of 26.4 ± 3.1. Functional capacity examined by CPX showed acceptable VO2 max values (23.9 ± 6.3 mL/kg/min). Mean SF-36 scores revealed an overall high level of quality of life in long-term survivors.

Conclusions

Long-term survival with a good neurological outcome with functional recovery was high in patients with refractory OHCA treated with MCS. These patients may expect a reasonable quality of life after discharge despite prolonged resuscitation.

Intraarrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and early invasive management in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomised trials

Background

Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated with standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) has poor outcomes. Transport to hospital followed by in-hospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) initiation may improve outcomes. We performed a pooled individual patient data analysis of two randomised controlled trials evaluating ECPR based approach in OHCA.

Methods

The individual patient data from two published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were pooled: ARREST (enrolled Aug 2019-June 2020; NCT03880565) and PRAGUE-OHCA (enrolled March 1, 2013-Oct 25, 2020; NCT01511666). Both trials enrolled patients with refractory OHCA and compared: intra-arrest transport with in-hospital ECPR initiation (invasive approach) versus continued standard ACLS. The primary outcome was 180-day survival with favourable neurological outcome (defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1-2). Secondary outcomes included: cumulative survival at 180 days, 30-day favourable neurological survival, and 30-day cardiac recovery. Risk of bias in each trial was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Heterogeneity was assessed via Forest plots.

Findings

The two RCTs included 286 patients. Of those randomised to the invasive (n = 147) and standard (n = 139) groups, respectively: the median age was 57 (IQR 47-65) and 58 years (IQR 48-66), and the median duration of resuscitation was 58 (IQR 43-69) and 49 (IQR 33-71) minutes (p = 0.17). In a modified intention to treat analysis, 45 (32.4%) in the invasive and 29 (19.7%) patients in the standard arm survived to 180 days with a favourable neurological outcome [absolute difference (AD), 95% CI: 12.7%, 2.6-22.7%, p = 0.015]. Forty-seven (33.8%) and 33 (22.4%) patients survived to 180 days [HR 0.59 (0.43-0.81); log rank test p = 0.0009]. At 30 days, 44 (31.7%) and 24 (16.3%) patients had favourable neurological outcome (AD 15.4%, 5.6-25.1%, p = 0.003), 60 (43.2%), and 46 (31.3%) patients had cardiac recovery (AD: 11.9%, 0.7-23%, p = 0.05), in the invasive and standard arms, respectively. The effect was larger in patients presenting with shockable rhythms (AD 18.8%, 7.6-29.4; p = 0.01; HR 2.26 [1.23-4.15]; p = 0.009) and prolonged CPR (>45 min; HR 3.99 (1.54-10.35); p = 0.005).

Interpretation

In patients with refractory OHCA, the invasive approach significantly improved 30- and 180-day neurologically favourable survival.

Funding

None.

Mouse Cardiac Arrest Model for Brain Imaging and Brain Physiology Monitoring During Ischemia and Resuscitation

Most cardiac arrest (CA) survivors experience varying degrees of neurologic deficits. To understand the mechanisms that underpin CA-induced brain injury and, subsequently, develop effective treatments, experimental CA research is essential. To this end, a few mouse CA models have been established. In most of these models, the mice are placed in the supine position in order to perform chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, this resuscitation procedure makes the real-time imaging/monitoring of brain physiology during CA and resuscitation challenging. To obtain such critical knowledge, the present protocol presents a mouse asphyxia CA model that does not require the chest compression CPR step. This model allows for the study of dynamic changes in blood flow, vascular structure, electrical potentials, and brain tissue oxygen from the pre-CA baseline to early post-CA reperfusion. Importantly, this model applies to aged mice. Thus, this mouse CA model is expected to be a critical tool for deciphering the impact of CA on brain physiology.

Outcomes of Patients With in- and out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest on Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support has been suggested to improve the survival rate in patients with refractory in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA and OHCA). Several factors predict outcome in these patients, including initial heart rhythm and low-flow time. Literature shows variable survival rates among patients who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (EPCR). The objective of this study is to analyze the outcomes (survival rate as well as neurological and disability outcomes) of patients treated with ECPR following refractory OHCA and IHCA. This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with refractory cardiac arrest treated with ECPR between February 2016 and March 2020. The primary outcomes were 24-hour, hospital discharge and 1-year survival after CA and the secondary endpoints were neurological and disability outcomes. Forty-eight patients were included in the analysis. 11/48 patients are In Hospital Cardiac Arrest (IHCA) and 37/48 patients are Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). Time from collapse to CPR for 79.2% of the patients was less than 5 minutes. The median CPR duration and collapse to ECMO were 40 and 45 minutes, respectively. The rate of survival was significantly higher in patient who presented with initial shockable rhythm (P = 0.006) and to whom targeted temperature management (TTM) post cardiac arrest was applied (P = 0.048). This first descriptive study about ECPR in the middle east region shows that 20.8% of ECPR patients survived until hospital discharge. Our analysis revealed that initial shockable rhythm and TTM are most important prognostic factors that predicts favorable neurological survival.

Advanced and Invasive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Techniques as an Adjunct to Advanced Cardiac Life Support

BACKGROUND

Despite numerous promising innovations, the chance of survival from sudden cardiac arrest has remained virtually unchanged for decades. Recently, technological advances have been made, user-friendly portable devices have been developed, and advanced invasive procedures have been described that could improve this unsatisfactory situation.

METHODS

A selective literature search in the core databases with a focus on randomized controlled trials and guidelines.

RESULTS

Technical aids, such as feedback systems or automated mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) devices, can improve chest compression quality. The latter, as well as extracorporeal CPR, might serve as a bridge to treatment (with extracorporeal CPR even as a bridge to recovery). Sonography may be used to improve thoracic compressions on the one hand and to rule out potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest on the other. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta might enhance myocardial and cerebral perfusion. Minithoracostomy, pericardiocentesis, or clamshell thoracotomy might resolve reversible causes of cardiac arrest.

CONCLUSIONS

It is crucial to identify those patients who may benefit from an advanced or invasive procedure and make the decision to implement the intervention in a timely manner. As with all infrequently performed procedures, sound education and regular training are paramount.