The impact of increased chest compression fraction on return of spontaneous circulation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not in ventricular fibrillation

Epidemiology and outcomes of out of hospital cardiac arrest in Karachi, Pakistan - A longitudinal study

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with survival outcomes remaining poor particularly in many low- and middle-income countries. We aimed to establish a pilot OHCA registry in Karachi, Pakistan to provide insights into OHCA patient demographics, pre-hospital and in-hospital care, and outcomes.

Methods

A multicenter longitudinal study was conducted from August 2015-October 2019 across 11 Karachi hospitals, using a standardized Utstein-based survey form. Data was retrospectively obtained from medical records, patients, and next-of-kin interviews at hospitals with accessible medical records, while hospitals without medical records system used on-site data collectors. Demographics, arrest characteristics, prehospital events, and survival outcomes were collected. Survivors underwent follow-up at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years.

Results

In total, 1068 OHCA patients were included. Mean age was 55 years, 61.1 % (n = 653) male. Witnessed arrests accounted for 94.9 % of the cases (n = 1013), whereas 89.4 % of the cases (n = 955) were transported via non-EMS. Bystander CPR was performed in 10.3 % (n = 110) cases whereas pre-hospital defibrillation performed in 0.4 % (n = 4). In-hospital defibrillation was performed in 9.9 % (n = 106) cases despite < 5 % shockable rhythms. Overall survival to discharge was 0.75 % (n = 8). Of these 8 patients, 7 patients survived to 1-year and 2 to 5-years. Neurological outcomes correlated with long-term survival.

Conclusion

OHCA survival rates are extremely low, necessitating public awareness interventions like CPR training, developing robust pre-hospital systems, and improving in-hospital emergency care through standardized training programs. This pilot registry lays the foundation for implementing interventions to improve survival and emergency medical infrastructure.

Effect of RapidShockTM Implementation on Perishock Pause in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

OBJECTIVES

Shorter pauses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are associated with better health outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Our primary objective was to examine the effect of a RapidShockTM defibrillator software upgrade compared with standard defibrillator software on the length of perishock pause during care for OHCA among adults. Secondary objectives were to assess the effects of RapidShockTM on other CPR pauses.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study between September 1, 2015 and September 30, 2020. "Standard" cardiac defibrillator software in manual interpretation mode was used for CPR delivered on or before November 30, 2018, while "RapidShockTM" software (ZOLL® Medical Corporation) was used after this date. For each study group, we calculated the perishock, perianalysis, and total CPR pause; each CPR cycle was considered an independent event. We then calculated the median and interquartile range (IQR) for observed pauses with the "Standard" and "RapidShockTM" software. Percent change in median perishock pause (shockable rhythms), perianalysis pause (non-shockable rhythms), and total CPR pause were compared between CPR administered with each software using the Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

There were 733 and 782 distinct CPR cycles administered using "Standard" and "RapidShockTM" software, respectively. A 31.8% reduction in median perishock pause was observed with "RapidShockTM" software compared with the "Standard" software (22.0 s (IQR 18.0 - 27.0 s) vs. 15.0 s (IQR 13.0 - 19.0 s); p < 0.01). The decrease in median perishock pause was driven by a reduction in the preshock phase (18 s vs. 10 s; 44.4% decrease in median pause; p < 0.01). No differences were observed in median perianalysis pause between the two groups. When combining shockable and non-shockable rhythms, we observed a reduction of 23.5% in median CPR pause (17.0 s (IQR 11.0 - 24.0 s) vs. 13s (IQR 10.0 - 17.0 s); p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we observed that the use of "RapidShockTM" defibrillator software was associated with shorter CPR pauses compared with the "Standard" software. Additional studies are required to examine whether further reductions in CPR pauses may be achieved and to investigate associations between shorter CPR pauses and health outcomes.

A retrospective comparison of mechanical cardio-pulmonary ventilation and manual bag valve ventilation in non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: A study from the Belgian cardiac arrest registry

BACKGROUND

The optimal ventilation modalities to manage out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remain debated. A specific pressure mode called cardio-pulmonary ventilation (CPV) may be used instead of manual bag ventilation (MBV). We sought to analyse the association between mechanical CPV and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in non-traumatic OHCA.

METHODS

MBV and CPV were retrospectively identified in patients with non-traumatic OHCA from the Belgian Cardiac Arrest Registry. We used a two-level mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the association between the ventilation modalities and outcomes. The primary and secondary study criteria were ROSC and survival with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2 at 30 days. Age, sex, initial rhythm, no-flow duration, low-flow duration, OHCA location, use of a mechanical chest compression device and Rankin status before arrest were used as covariables.

RESULTS

Between January 2017 and December 2021, 2566 patients with OHCA who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. 298 (11.6%) patients were mechanically ventilated with CPV whereas 2268 were manually ventilated. The use of CPV was associated with greater probability of ROSC both in the unadjusted (odds ratio: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.63; p = 0.043) and adjusted analyses (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.16, 95%CI 1.37-3.41; p = 0.001) but not with a lower CPC score (aOR: 1.44, 95%CI 0.72-2.89; p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with MBV, CPV was associated with an increased risk of ROSC but not with improved an CPC score in patients with OHCA. Prospective randomised trials are needed to challenge these results.

Intentional interruptions during compression only CPR: A scoping review

Introduction

Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains one of the main causes of death among industrialized countries. The initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by laypeople before the arrival of emergency medical services improves survival. Mouth-to-mouth ventilation may constitute a hindering factor to start bystander CPR, while during continuous chest compressions (CCC) CPR quality decreases rapidly. The aim of this scoping review is to examine the existing literature on strategies that investigate the inclusion of intentional pauses during compression-only resuscitation (CO-CPR) to improve the performance in the context of single lay rescuer OHCA.

Methods

The protocol of this Scoping review was prospectively registered in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/rvn8j). A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL was performed.

Results

Six articles were included. All studies were carried out on simulation manikins and involved a total of 1214 subjects. One study had a multicenter design. Three studies were randomized controlled simulation trials, the rest were prospective randomized crossover studies. The tested protocols were heterogeneous and compared CCC to CO-CPR with intentional interruptions of various length. The most common primary outcome was compressions depth. Compression rate, rescuers' perceived exertion and composite outcomes were also evaluated. Compressions depth and perceived exertion improved in most study groups while compression rate and chest compression fraction remained within guidelines indications.

Conclusions

In simulation studies, the inclusion of intentional interruptions during CO-CPR within the specific scenario of single rescuer bystander CPR during OHCA may improve the rate of compressions with correct depth and lower rate of perceived exertion. Further high-quality research and feasibility and safety of protocols incorporating intentional interruptions during CO-CPR may be justified.

Association Between Chest Compression Pause Duration and Survival After Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

The association between chest compression (CC) pause duration and pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest survival outcomes is unknown. The American Heart Association has recommended minimizing pauses in CC in children to <10 seconds, without supportive evidence. We hypothesized that longer maximum CC pause durations are associated with worse survival and neurological outcomes.

METHODS

In this cohort study of index pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrests reported in pediRES-Q (Quality of Pediatric Resuscitation in a Multicenter Collaborative) from July of 2015 through December of 2021, we analyzed the association in 5-second increments of the longest CC pause duration for each event with survival and favorable neurological outcome (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category ≤3 or no change from baseline). Secondary exposures included having any pause >10 seconds or >20 seconds and number of pauses >10 seconds and >20 seconds per 2 minutes.

RESULTS

We identified 562 index in-hospital cardiac arrests (median [Q1, Q3] age 2.9 years [0.6, 10.0], 43% female, 13% shockable rhythm). Median length of the longest CC pause for each event was 29.8 seconds (11.5, 63.1). After adjustment for confounders, each 5-second increment in the longest CC pause duration was associated with a 3% lower relative risk of survival with favorable neurological outcome (adjusted risk ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.99]; P=0.02). Longest CC pause duration was also associated with survival to hospital discharge (adjusted risk ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]; P=0.01) and return of spontaneous circulation (adjusted risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.91-0.94]; P<0.001). Secondary outcomes of any pause >10 seconds or >20 seconds and number of CC pauses >10 seconds and >20 seconds were each significantly associated with adjusted risk ratio of return of spontaneous circulation, but not survival or neurological outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Each 5-second increment in longest CC pause duration during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with lower chance of survival with favorable neurological outcome, survival to hospital discharge, and return of spontaneous circulation. Any CC pause >10 seconds or >20 seconds and number of pauses >10 seconds and >20 seconds were significantly associated with lower adjusted probability of return of spontaneous circulation, but not survival or neurological outcomes.

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is predicated on a community and system-wide approach that includes rapid recognition of cardiac arrest, capable bystander CPR, effective basic and advanced life support (BLS and ALS) by EMS providers, and coordinated postresuscitation care. Management of these critically ill patients continues to evolve. This article focuses on the management of OHCA by EMS providers.

High Variability in the Duration of Chest Compression Interruption is Associated With Poor Outcomes in Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between chest compression interruption (CCI) patterns and outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

DESIGN

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) data were collected using defibrillator-electrode and bedside monitor waveforms from pediatric ECPR cases between 2013 and 2021. Duration and variability of CCI during cannulation for ECPR was determined and compared with survival to discharge using Fishers exact test and logistic regressions with cluster-robust se s for adjusted analyses.

SETTING

Quaternary care children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Pediatric patients undergoing ECPR.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 41 ECPR events, median age was 0.7 years (Q1, Q3: 0.1, 5.4), 37% (15/41) survived to hospital discharge with 73% (11/15) of survivors having a favorable neurologic outcome. Median duration of CPR from start of ECPR cannulation procedure to initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) flow was 21 minutes (18, 30). Median duration of no-flow times associated with CCI during ECMO cannulation was 11 seconds (5, 28). Following planned adjustment for known confounders, survival to discharge was inversely associated with maximum duration of CCI (odds ratio [OR] 0.91 [0.86-0.95], p = 0.04) as well as the variability in the CCI duration (OR 0.96 [0.93-0.99], p = 0.04). Cases with both above-average CCI duration and higher CCI variability ( sd > 30 s) were associated with lowest survival (12% vs. 54%, p = 0.009). Interaction modeling suggests that lower variability in CCI is associated with improved survival, especially in cases where average CCI durations are higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Shorter duration of CCI and lower variability in CCI during cannulation for ECPR were associated with survival following refractory pediatric cardiac arrest.

Transthoracic impedance variability to assess quality of chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Chest compression is a lifesaving intervention in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the optimal metrics to assess its quality have yet to be identified. The objective of this study was to investigate whether a new parameter, that is, the variability of the chest compression-generated transthoracic impedance (TTI), namely ImpCC , which measures the consistency of the chest compression maneuver, relates to resuscitation outcome.

METHODS

This multicenter observational, retrospective study included OHCAs with shockable rhythm. ImpCC variability was evaluated with the power spectral density analysis of the TTI. Multivariate regression model was used to examine the impact of ImpCC variability on defibrillation success. Secondary outcome measures were return of spontaneous circulation and survival.

RESULTS

Among 835 treated OHCAs, 680 met inclusion criteria and 565 matched long-term outcomes. ImpCC was significantly higher in patients with unsuccessful defibrillation compared to those with successful defibrillation (p = .0002). Lower ImpCC variability was associated with successful defibrillation with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.993 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.989-0.998, p = .003), while the standard chest compression fraction (CCF) was not associated (OR 1.008 [95 % CI, 0.992-1.026, p = .33]). Neither ImpCC nor CCF was associated with long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population, consistency of chest compression maneuver, measured by variability in TTI, was an independent predictor of defibrillation outcome. ImpCC may be a useful novel metrics for improving quality of care in OHCA.

Compliance with CPR quality guidelines and survival after 30 days following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Our study assessed the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) given by emergency medical services in Southern Ostrobothnia Finland, as is advised in the international guidelines. The goal was to evaluate the current quality of CPR given to patients who suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and to examine possible measures for improving emergency medical services.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Southern Ostrobothnia, Finland, during a three-year period. Confounding caused by each patient's individual medical history was addressed by calculating Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), a score describing individual's risk for death in 10 years. The Utstein analysis and the CPR metrics were acquired from the medical records hospital district in question and analysed in an orderly manner using SPSS. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean (SD) and median [IQR].

RESULTS

We found that of the 349 patients, 144 (41%) received ROSC, 96 (28%) survived to the hospital and 51 (15%) survived for at least 30 days. CPR metrics data were available for 181 patients. CCIs were 3.0 versus 5.0 (p = .157) for the ones who did and those who did not survive at least 30 days. Correspondingly, following metrics were as follows: Mean compression depth was 5.1 (1.3) versus 5.6 (0.8) cm (p = .088), median 28 [18;40] versus 40 [26;54]% of the compressions were in target depth (p = .015) and median compression rate was 113 [109;119] versus 112 [108;120] min-1 (p = .757). The median no-flow fraction was 5.1 [2.8;7.1] versus 3.7 [2.5;5.5] s (p = .073). Ventricular fibrillation (OR 8.74, 95% CI 2.89-26.43, p < .001), public location (OR 3.163, 95% CI 1.03-9.69, p = .044) and compression rate of 100-110/min (OR 7.923, 95% CI 2.11-29.82, p = .002) were related to survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients who suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Southern Ostrobothnia received CPR that met the international CPR quality target values. The proportion of unintentional pauses during CPR was low and the 30-day survival rate exceeded the international average.

Chest compression quality and patient outcomes with the use of a CPR feedback device: A retrospective study

Feedback devices were developed to guide resuscitations as targets recommended by various guidelines are difficult to achieve. Yet, there is limited evidence to support their use for in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA), and they did not correlate with patient outcomes. Therefore, this study has investigated the compression quality and patient outcomes in IHCA with the use of a feedback device via a retrospective study of inpatient code blue activations in a Singapore hospital over one year. The primary outcome was compression quality and secondary outcomes were survival, downtime and neurological status. 64 of 110 (58.2%) cases were included. Most resuscitations (71.9%) met the recommended chest compression fraction (CCF, defined as the proportion of time spent on compressions during resuscitation) despite overall quality being suboptimal. Greater survival to discharge and better neurological status in resuscitated patients respectively correlated with higher median CCF (p = 0.040 and 0.026 respectively) and shorter downtime (p < 0.001 and 0.001 respectively); independently, a higher CCF correlated with a shorter downtime (p = 0.014). Overall, this study demonstrated that reducing interruptions is crucial for good outcomes in IHCA. However, compression quality remained suboptimal despite feedback device implementation, possibly requiring further simulation training and coaching. Future multicentre studies incorporating these measures should be explored.

Bilingual resuscitation training does not affect adherence to resuscitation guidelines but reduces leadership skills and overall team performance. An observational study with cross-border German-Polish training

Aim of study

This study aims to investigate feasibility and quality of a bilingual cardiopulmonary resuscitation training with interprofessional emergency teams from Germany and Poland.

Methods

As part of a cross-border European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg-VA) funded project a combined communication and simulation training was organised. Teams of German and Polish emergency medicine personnel jointly practised resuscitation. The course was held in both languages with consecutive translation.Quality of chest compression was assessed using a simulator with feedback application. Learning objectives (quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, adherence to guidelines, closed loop communication), and team performance were assessed by an external observer. Coopeŕs Team Emergency Assessment Measure questionnaire was used.

Results

Twenty-one scenarios with 17 participants were analysed. In all scenarios, defibrillation and medication were delivered with correct dosage and at the right time. Mean fraction of correct hand position was 85.7% ± 25.7 [95%-CI 74.0; 97.4], mean fraction of compression depth 75.1% ± 21.0 [95%-CI 65.6; 84.7], compression rate 117.7 min-1 ± 7.1 [95%-CI 114.4; 120.9], and chest compression fraction 83.3% ± 3.8 [95%-CI 81.6; 85.0].Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation was rated as "fair" to "good", adherence to guidelines as "good", and closed loop communication as "fair". Bilingual teams demonstrated good situational awareness, but lack of leadership and suboptimal overall team performance.

Conclusion

Bilingual and interprofessional cross-border resuscitation training in German and Polish tandem teams is feasible. It does not affect quality of technical skills such as high-quality chest compression but does affect performance of non-technical skills (e.g. closed loop communication and leadership).

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is predicated on a community and system-wide approach that includes rapid recognition of cardiac arrest, capable bystander CPR, effective basic and advanced life support (BLS and ALS) by EMS providers, and coordinated postresuscitation care. Management of these critically ill patients continues to evolve. This article focuses on the management of OHCA by EMS providers.

Methods for calculating ventilation rates during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

Ventilation control is important during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We compared different methods for calculating ventilation rates (VR) during OHCA.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial, identifying ventilations through capnogram recordings. We determined VR by: 1) counting the number of breaths within a time epoch ("counted" VR), and 2) calculating the mean of the inverse of measured time between breaths within a time epoch ("measured" VR). We repeated the VR estimates using different time epochs (10, 20, 30, 60 sec). We defined hypo- and hyperventilation as VR <6 and >12 breaths/min, respectively. We assessed differences in estimated hypo- and hyperventilation with each VR measurement technique.

RESULTS

Of 3,004 patients, data were available for 1,010. With the counted method, total hypoventilation increased with longer time epochs ([10-s epoch: 75 sec hypoventilation] to [60-s epoch: 97 sec hypoventilation]). However, with the measured method, total hypoventilation decreased with longer time epochs ([10-s epoch: 223 sec hypoventilation] to [60-s epoch: 150 sec hypoventilation]). With the counted method, the total duration of hyperventilation decreased with longer time epochs ([10-s epochs: 35 sec hyperventilation] to [60-s epoch: 0 sec hyperventilation]). With the measured method, total hyperventilation decreased with longer time epochs ([10-s epoch: 78 sec hyperventilation] to [60-s epoch: 0 sec hyperventilation]). Differences between the measured and counted estimates were smallest with a 60-s time epoch.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantifications of hypo- and hyperventilation vary with the applied measurement methods. Measurement methods are important when characterizing ventilation rates in OHCA.

Impact of Ultrasonography on Chest Compression Fraction and Survival in Patients with Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

INTRODUCTION

Whether ultrasonography (US) contributes to delays in chest compressions and hence a negative impact on survival is uncertain. In this study we aimed to investigate the impact of US on chest compression fraction (CCF) and patient survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed video recordings of the resuscitation process in a convenience sample of adult patients with non-traumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Patients receiving US once or more during resuscitation were categorized as the US group, while the patients who did not receive US were categorized as the non-US group. The primary outcome was CCF, and the secondary outcomes were the rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to admission and discharge, and survival to discharge with a favorable neurological outcome between the two groups. We also evaluated the individual pause duration and the percentage of prolonged pauses associated with US.

RESULTS

A total of 236 patients with 3,386 pauses were included. Of these patients, 190 received US and 284 pauses were related to US. Longer resuscitation duration was observed in the US group (median, 30.3 vs 9.7 minutes, P<.001). The US group had comparable CCF (93.0% vs 94.3%, P=0.29) with the non-US group. Although the non-US group had a better rate of ROSC (36% vs 52%, P=0.04), the rates of survival to admission (36% vs 48%, P=0.13), survival to discharge (11% vs 15%, P=0.37), and survival with favorable neurological outcome (5% vs 9%, P=0.23) did not differ between the two groups. The pause duration of pulse checks with US was longer than pulse checks alone (median, 8 vs 6 seconds, P=0.02). The percentage of prolonged pauses was similar between the two groups (16% vs 14%, P=0.49).

CONCLUSION

When compared to the non-ultrasound group, patients receiving US had comparable chest compression fractions and rates of survival to admission and discharge, and survival to discharge with a favorable neurological outcome. The individual pause was lengthened related to US. However, patients without US had a shorter resuscitation duration and a better rate of ROSC. The trend toward poorer results in the US group was possibly due to confounding variables and nonprobability sampling. It should be better investigated in further randomized studies.

2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

This is the sixth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. This summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews include cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport; approach to resuscitation after drowning; passive ventilation; minimizing pauses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; temperature management after cardiac arrest; use of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest; use of vasopressin and corticosteroids during cardiac arrest; coronary angiography after cardiac arrest; public-access defibrillation devices for children; pediatric early warning systems; maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth; suctioning of amniotic fluid at birth; tactile stimulation for resuscitation immediately after birth; use of continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress at term birth; respiratory and heart rate monitoring in the delivery room; supraglottic airway use in neonates; prearrest prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrest mortality; basic life support training for likely rescuers of high-risk populations; effect of resuscitation team training; blended learning for life support training; training and recertification for resuscitation instructors; and recovery position for maintenance of breathing and prevention of cardiac arrest. Members from 6 task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and generated consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections, and priority knowledge gaps for future research are listed.

2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

This is the sixth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. This summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews include cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport; approach to resuscitation after drowning; passive ventilation; minimizing pauses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; temperature management after cardiac arrest; use of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest; use of vasopressin and corticosteroids during cardiac arrest; coronary angiography after cardiac arrest; public-access defibrillation devices for children; pediatric early warning systems; maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth; suctioning of amniotic fluid at birth; tactile stimulation for resuscitation immediately after birth; use of continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress at term birth; respiratory and heart rate monitoring in the delivery room; supraglottic airway use in neonates; prearrest prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrest mortality; basic life support training for likely rescuers of high-risk populations; effect of resuscitation team training; blended learning for life support training; training and recertification for resuscitation instructors; and recovery position for maintenance of breathing and prevention of cardiac arrest. Members from 6 task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and generated consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections, and priority knowledge gaps for future research are listed.

2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

This is the sixth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. This summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews include cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport; approach to resuscitation after drowning; passive ventilation; minimising pauses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; temperature management after cardiac arrest; use of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest; use of vasopressin and corticosteroids during cardiac arrest; coronary angiography after cardiac arrest; public-access defibrillation devices for children; pediatric early warning systems; maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth; suctioning of amniotic fluid at birth; tactile stimulation for resuscitation immediately after birth; use of continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress at term birth; respiratory and heart rate monitoring in the delivery room; supraglottic airway use in neonates; prearrest prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrest mortality; basic life support training for likely rescuers of high-risk populations; effect of resuscitation team training; blended learning for life support training; training and recertification for resuscitation instructors; and recovery position for maintenance of breathing and prevention of cardiac arrest. Members from 6 task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and generated consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections, and priority knowledge gaps for future research are listed.

Telemedical Intensivist Consultation During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation: A Simulation-Based, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

High-quality leadership improves resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), but experienced resuscitation leaders are unavailable in many settings.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does real-time telemedical intensivist consultation improve resuscitation quality for IHCA?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, standardized high-fidelity simulations of IHCA conducted between February 2017 and September 2018 on inpatient medicine and surgery units at seven hospitals were assigned randomly to consultation (intervention) or simulated observation (control) by a critical care physician via telemedicine. The primary outcome was the fraction of time without chest compressions (ie, no-flow fraction) during an approximately 4- to 6-min analysis window beginning with telemedicine activation. Secondary outcomes included other measures of chest compression quality, defibrillation and medication timing, resuscitation protocol adherence, nontechnical team performance, and participants' experience during resuscitation participation.

RESULTS

No-flow fraction did not differ between the 36 intervention group (0.22 ± 0.13) and the 35 control group (0.19 ± 0.10) resuscitation simulations included in the intention-to-treat analysis (P = .41). The etiology of the simulated cardiac arrest was identified more often during evaluable resuscitations supported by a telemedical intensivist consultant (22/32 [69%]) compared with control resuscitations (10/34 [29%]; P = .001), but other measures of resuscitation quality, resuscitation team performance, and participant experience did not differ between intervention groups. Problems with audio quality or the telemedicine connection affected 14 intervention group resuscitations (39%).

INTERPRETATION

Consultation by a telemedical intensivist physician did not improve resuscitation quality during simulated ward-based IHCA.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03000829; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Drug Intoxication: A Retrospective Comparison of Survivors and Nonsurvivors

Selecting patients most likely to benefit from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) to treat refractory drug-induced cardiovascular shock remains a difficult challenge for physicians. This study reported short-term survival outcomes and factors associated with mortality in V-A ECMO-treated patients for poisoning. Twenty-two patients placed on V-A ECMO after drug intoxication from January 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint of this study was survival at hospital discharge. Univariate descriptive analysis was performed to compare survivors and nonsurvivors during hospitalization. The overall survival at hospital discharge was 45.4% (n = 10/22). Survival rate tended to be higher in patients treated for refractory shock (n = 7/10) compared with those treated for refractory cardiac arrest (n = 3/12, p = 0.08). Low-flow duration and time from admission to ECMO cannulation were shorter in survivors ( p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively). Baseline characteristics before ECMO, including the class of drugs involved in the poisoning, between survivors and nonsurvivors were not statistically different except pH, bicarbonate, serum lactate, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Survival After Veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE) score. All patients with SAVE-score risk classes II/III survived whereas 85.7% (n = 12/14) of those with SAVE-score risk classes IV/V died. A lactic acid >9 mmol/L predicts mortality with a sensitivity/specificity ratio of 83.3%/100%. V-A ECMO for severe drug intoxication should be reserved for highly selected poisoned patients who do not respond to conventional therapies. Shortening the timing of V-A ECMO initiation should be a key priority in improving outcomes. Low-flow time >60min, lactic acid >9mmol/L, and SAVE-score may be good indicators of a worse prognosis.

Airway Strategy and Ventilation Rates in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial

BACKGROUND

We sought to describe ventilation rates during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation and their associations with airway management strategy and outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide capnography data from adult OHCA enrolled in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART). Using automated signal processing techniques, we determined continuous ventilation rate for consecutive 10-second epochs after airway insertion. We defined hypoventilation as a ventilation rate <6 breaths/min. We defined hyperventilation as a ventilation rate >12 breaths/min. We compared differences in total and percentage post-airway hyper- and hypoventilation between airway interventions (laryngeal tube (LT) vs. endotracheal intubation (ETI). We also determined associations between hypo-/hyperventilation and OHCA outcomes (ROSC, 72-hour survival, hospital survival, hospital survival with favorable neurologic status).

RESULTS

Adequate post-airway capnography were available for 1,010 (LT n=714, ETI n=296) of 3,004 patients. Median ventilation rates were: LT 8.0 (IQR 6.5-9.6) breaths/min, ETI 7.9 (6.5-9.7) breaths/min. Total duration and percentage of post-airway time with hypoventilation were similar between LT and ETI: median 1.8 vs. 1.7 minutes, p=0.94; median 10.5% vs. 11.5%, p=0.60. Total duration and percentage of post-airway time with hyperventilation were similar between LT and ETI: median 0.4 vs. 0.4 minutes, p=0.91; median 2.1% vs. 1.9%, p=0.99. Hypo- and hyperventilation exhibited limited associations with OHCA outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In the PART Trial, EMS personnel delivered post-airway ventilations at rates satisfying international guidelines, with only limited hypo- or hyperventilation. Hypo- and hyperventilation durations did not differ between airway management strategy and exhibited uncertain associations with OCHA outcomes.

Association of Chest Compression Pause Duration Prior to E-CPR Cannulation with Cardiac Arrest Survival Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To characterize chest compression (CC) pause duration during the last 5 minutes of pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to extracorporeal-CPR (E-CPR) cannulation and the association with survival outcomes.

METHODS

Cohort study from a resuscitation quality collaborative including pediatric E-CPR cardiac arrest events ≥10 min with CPR quality data. We characterized CC interruptions during the last 5 min of defibrillator-electrode recorded CPR (prior to cannulation) and assessed the association between the longest CC pause duration and survival outcomes using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 49 E-CPR events, median age was 2.0 [Q1, Q3: 0.6, 6.6] years, 55% (27/49) survived to hospital discharge and 18/49 (37%) with favorable neurological outcome. Median duration of CPR was 51 [43, 69] min. During the last 5 min of recorded CPR prior to cannulation, median duration of the longest CC pause was 14.0 [6.3, 29.4] sec: 66% >10 sec, 25% >29 sec, 14% >60 sec, and longest pause 168 sec. Following planned adjustment for known confounders of age and CPR duration, each 5-sec increase in longest CC pause duration was associated with lower odds of survival to hospital discharge [adjusted OR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.79-0.99] and lower odds of survival with favorable neurological outcome [adjusted OR 0.77, 95%CI: 0.60-0.98].

CONCLUSIONS

Long CC pauses were common during the last 5 min of recorded CPR prior to E-CPR cannulation. Following adjustment for age and CPR duration, each 5-second incremental increase in longest CC pause duration was associated with significantly decreased rates of survival and favorable neurological outcome.

Predictive performances of ALS and BLS termination of resuscitation rules in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for different resuscitation protocols

BACKGROUND

Resuscitation guidance has advanced; however, the predictive performance of the termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule has not been validated for different resuscitation protocols published by the American Heart Association (AHA).

METHODS

A retrospective study validating the basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) TOR rules was conducted using an Utstein-style database in Tainan city, Taiwan. Adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, (using the AHA 2010 resuscitation protocol) and from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, (using the AHA 2015 resuscitation protocol) were included. The characteristics of rule performance were calculated, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value.

RESULTS

Among 1260 eligible OHCA patients in 2015, 757 met the BLS TOR rule and 124 met the ALS TOR rule. The specificity and PPV for predicting unfavorable neurological outcomes were 61.1% and 99.0%, respectively, for the BLS TOR rule and 93.8% and 99.2%, respectively, for the ALS TOR rule. A total of 970 OHCA patients were enrolled in 2020, of whom 438 met the BLS TOR rule and 104 met the ALS TOR rule. The specificity and PPV for predicting unfavorable neurological outcomes were 85.7% and 100%, respectively, for the BLS TOR rule and 99.5% and 100%, respectively, for the ALS TOR rule.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the BLS and ALS TOR rules performed better when using the 2015 AHA resuscitation protocols compared to the 2010 protocols, with increased PPVs and decreased false-positive rates in predicting survival to discharge and good neurological outcomes at discharge. The BLS and ALS TOR rules can perform differently while the resuscitation protocols are updated. As the concepts and practices of resuscitation progress, the BLS and ALS TOR rules should be evaluated and validated accordingly.

Management Decisions: The Effectiveness and Size of the Emergency Medical Team

In Poland, often for economic reasons, the staffing of medical rescue teams is limited to the legally required minimum. This gives rise to problems related to the effectiveness and efficiency of medical rescue teams. A literature review did not find any sources addressing the issue of the verification of the effectiveness of paramedic teams depending on the personnel composition of units. The aim of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of resuscitation depending on the size of the medical rescue team, comparing the work of two- and three-person teams. In total, 100 two-person teams and an analogous number of three-person units were studied. Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 24 package. The results showed that the assessment of the condition of the victim as well as the ability to assess the heart rhythm and monitor the condition during advanced measures were more effective in three-person teams; three-person teams also used oxygen more frequently during advanced life support (ALS). Most of the elements influenced the quality of resuscitation and it can be unequivocally stated that the work of three rescuers is more efficient and definitely more effective.

Chest Compression Fraction Alone Does Not Adequately Measure Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is important for increased survival and improved neurological outcome. Chest compression fraction measures the proportion of time chest compressions are given during a cardiac arrest resuscitation. Chest compression fraction has not been compared with the quality of chest compressions delivered at the recommended rate and depth of 100-120/min and 2.0-2.4 inches, respectively.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluate whether chest compression fraction correlates with compressions at a target rate of 100-120/min and depth of 2.0-2.4 inches in chest diameter.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study design was used to compare chest compression fraction to compressions in target in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a prehospital urban setting. We include all adult, non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with a resuscitation attempt during January 1, 2019 through September 30, 2019, for a total of 9 months. Spearman's rank correlation was used to determine correlation between compression fraction and compressions in target.

RESULTS

A total of 120 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases were included in the study. We found a high chest compression fraction median of 83% (interquartile range 72-90%), but a low compression in target median of 13% (interquartile range 5-29%). There was no significant correlation between chest compression fraction and compressions in target when analyzed linearly (Spearman's Rho = 0.165, p = 0.072). No difference was found when dichotomizing chest compression fraction into high and low variables in comparison with compressions in target (14% vs. 10%, p = 0.119).

CONCLUSION

Chest compression fraction is not associated with compressions in target for rate and depth for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Effect of Early Supraglottic Airway Device Insertion on Chest Compression Fraction during Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Randomised Controlled Trial

Early insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) device could improve chest compression fraction by allowing providers to perform continuous chest compressions or by shortening the interruptions needed to deliver ventilations. SGA devices do not require the same expertise as endotracheal intubation. This study aimed to determine whether the immediate insertion of an i-gel^® while providing continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations could generate higher CCFs than the standard 30:2 approach using a face-mask in a simulation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A multicentre, parallel, randomised, superiority, simulation study was carried out. The primary outcome was the difference in CCF during the first two minutes of resuscitation. Overall and per-cycle CCF quality of compressions and ventilations parameters were also compared. Among thirteen teams of two participants, the early insertion of an i-gel^® resulted in higher CCFs during the first two minutes (89.0% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.001). Overall and per-cycle CCF were consistently higher in the i-gel^® group, even after the 30:2 alternation had been resumed. In the i-gel^® group, ventilation parameters were enhanced, but compressions were significantly shallower (4.6 cm vs. 5.2 cm, p = 0.007). This latter issue must be addressed before clinical trials can be considered.

Positive association between ambulance double-crewing and OHCA outcomes: A New Zealand observational study

Background and objectives

New Zealand emergency medical service (EMS) crewing configurations generally place one (single) or two (double) crew on each responding ambulance unit. Recent studies demonstrated that double-crewing was associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), therefore single-crewed ambulances have been phased out. We aimed to determine the association between this crewing policy change and OHCA outcomes in New Zealand.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study using data from the St John OHCA Registry on patients treated during two different time periods: the Pre-Period (1 October 2013-30 June 2015), when single-crewed ambulances were in use by EMS, and the Post-Period (1 July 2016-30 June 2018) when single-crewed ambulances were being phased out. Geographic areas identified as having low levels of double crewing during the Pre-Period were selected for investigation. The outcome of survival to thirty-days post-OHCA was investigated using logistic regression analysis.

Results

The proportion of double-crewed ambulances arriving at OHCA events increased in the Post-Period (81.8%) compared to the Pre-Period (67.5%) (p ≤ 0.001). Response times decreased by two minutes (Pre-Period: median 8 min, IQR [6-11], Post-Period: median 6 min, IQR [4-9]; p ≤ 0.001). Thirty-day survival was significantly improved in the Post-Period (OR 1.63, 95%CI (1.04-2.55), p = 0.03).

Conclusions

An association between improved OHCA survival following increased responses by double-crewed ambulances was demonstrated. This study suggests that improvements in resourcing are associated with improved OHCA outcomes.

Pre-charging the defibrillator before rhythm analysis reduces hands-off time in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm

AIM

To evaluate the effect of pre-charging the defibrillator before rhythm analysis on hands-off time in patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm.

METHODS

Pre-charging was implemented in the Emergency Medical Service in the Central Denmark Region in June 2018. Training consisted of hands-on simulation scenarios, e-learning material, and written instructions. Data were extracted from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry for a 14-month period spanning the implementation of pre-charging. Patients having received at least one shock were included. Transthoracic impedance data were analysed. We recorded hands-off time and peri-shock pauses for all defibrillation procedures and the total hands-off fraction for all cardiac arrests.

RESULTS

Impedance and outcome data were available for 178 patients. 523 defibrillation procedures were analysed. The pre-charge method was associated with shorter median hands-off time per defibrillation procedure (7.6 (IQR 5.8-9.9) vs. 12.6 (IQR 10-16.4) seconds, p < 0.001) but longer pre-shock pause (4 (IQR 2.7-6.1) vs 1.7 (IQR 1.2-3) seconds, p < 0.001) when compared to the current guideline-recommended defibrillation method. The total hands-off fraction per cardiac arrest was reduced after implementation of the pre-charge method (16.5% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.003). No increase in shocks to non-shockable rhythms or personnel was registered. Patients who received only pre-charge defibrillations had an increased odds ratio of return of spontaneous circulation (aOR 2.91; 95%CI 1.09-7.8, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Pre-charging the defibrillator reduced hands-off time during defibrillation procedures, reduces the total hands-off fraction and may be associated with increased return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm.

Video case review for quality improvement during cardiac arrest resuscitation in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are a leading global cause of mortality. The American Heart Association (AHA) promotes several important strategies associated with improved cardiac arrest (CA) outcomes, including decreasing pulse check time and maintaining a chest compression fraction (CCF) > 0.80. Video review is a potential tool to improve skills and analyse deficiencies in various situations; however, its use in improving medical resuscitation remains poorly studied in the emergency department (ED). We implemented a quality improvement initiative, which utilised video review of CA resuscitations in an effort to improve compliance with such AHA quality metrics.

METHODS

A cardiopulmonary resuscitation video review team of emergency medicine residents were assembled to analyse CA resuscitations in our urban academic ED. Videos were reviewed by two residents, one of whom was a senior resident (Postgraduate Year 3 or 4), and analysed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for numerous quality improvement metrics, including pulse check time, CCF, time to intravenous access and time to patient attached to monitor.

RESULTS

We collected data on 94 CA resuscitations between July 2017 and June 2020. Average pulse check time was 13.09 (SD ± 5.97) seconds, and 38% of pulse checks were <10 seconds. After the implementation of the video review process, there was a significant decrease in average pulse check time (P = .01) and a significant increase in CCF (P = .01) throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the video review and feedback process was significantly associated with improvements in AHA quality metrics for resuscitation in CA amongst patients presented to the ED.

A Multicenter International Randomized Controlled Manikin Study on Different Protocols of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Laypeople: The MANI-CPR Trial

BACKGROUND

Compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a suggested technique for laypeople facing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, it is difficult performing high-quality CPR until emergency medical services arrival with this technique. We aimed to verify whether incorporating intentional interruptions of different frequency and duration increases laypeople's CPR quality during an 8-minute scenario compared with compression-only CPR.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter randomized manikin study selecting participants from 2154 consecutive laypeople who followed a basic life support/automatic external defibrillation course. People who achieved high-quality CPR in 1-minute test on a computerized manikin were asked to participate. Five hundred seventy-six were enrolled, and 59 were later excluded for technical reasons or incorrect test recording. Participants were randomized in an 8-minute OHCA scenario using 3 CPR protocols (30 compressions and 2-second pause, 30c2s; 50 compressions and 5-second pause, 50c5s; 100 compressions and 10-second pause, 100c10s) or compression-only technique. The main outcome was the percentage of chest compressions with adequate depth.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventeen participants were evaluated. There was a statistically significant difference regarding the percentage of compressions with correct depth among the groups (30c2s, 96%; 50c5s, 96%; 100c10s, 92%; compression only, 79%; P = 0.006). Post hoc comparison showed a significant difference for 30c2s (P = 0.023) and for 50c5s (P = 0.003) versus compression only. Regarding secondary outcome, there were a higher chest compression fraction in the compression-only group and a higher rate of pauses longer than 10 seconds in the 100c10s.

CONCLUSIONS

In a simulated OHCA, 30c2s and 50c5s protocols were characterized by a higher rate of chest compressions with correct depth than compression only. This could have practical consequences in laypeople CPR training and recommendations.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02632500.

Compression depth measured by accelerometer vs. outcome in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Analyses of data recorded by monitor-defibrillators that measure CPR depth with different methods show significant relationships between the process and outcome of CPR. Our objective was to evaluate whether chest compression depth was significantly associated with outcome based on accelerometer-recordings obtained with monitor-defibrillators from a single manufacturer, and to assess whether an accelerometer-based analysis corroborated evidence-based practice guidelines on performance of CPR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 5434 adult patients treated from seven US and Canadian cities between January 2007 and May 2015. These had mean (SD) age of 64.2 (17.2) years, mean compression depth of 45.9 (12.7) mm, ROSC sustained to ED arrival of 26%, and survival to hospital discharge of 8%. For survival to discharge, the adjusted odds ratios were 1.15 (95% CI, 0.86, 1.55) for cases within 2005 depth range (38-51 mm), and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.91, 1.50) for cases within 2010 depth range (>50 mm) compared to those with an average depth of <38 mm. The adjusted odds ratio of survival was 1.33 (95% CI, 1.01, 1.75) for cases within 2015 depth range (50 to 60 mm) for at least 60% of minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of patients with OHCA demonstrated that increased chest compression depth measured by accelerometer is associated with better survival. It confirms that current evidence-based recommendations to compress within 50-60 mm are likely associated with greater survival than compressing to another depth.

Effect of Advanced Airway Management by Paramedics During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest on Chest Compression Fraction and Return of Spontaneous Circulation

Purpose

To obtain effective systemic blood flow and coronary perfusion by chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, it is recommended that the interruption time of chest compressions be kept to a minimum, and that the chest compression fraction (CCF) should be kept high. In this study, we examined the effects of advanced airway management by paramedics in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases on CCF and on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before arrival at the hospital.

Participants and Methods

A total of 283 adult, non-traumatic OHCA cases who were in cardiopulmonary arrest at the time of EMS contact between April 2015 and March 2017 were registered for this study. We retrospectively investigated the presence or absence of advanced airway clearance, CCF and ROSC during CPR. CCF was calculated by measuring the chest compression interruption time from the ECG waveform recorded on a semiautomatic defibrillator (Philips HeartStart MRX). The data obtained were recorded on a computer, and comparisons between groups were examined using an untested t-test and χ²- test.

Results

Of the 283 patients with OHCA, 159 were included in the analysis. The CCF of the AAM group was 89.4%, which was significantly higher than that in the BMV group (84.3%) (P<0.01). Forty-one patients had ROSC at the time of arrival at the hospital, and the CCF of ROSC patients was 89.7%, which was significantly higher than that of non-ROSC patients (87.2%) (P<0.01). ROSC was also obtained in 31.8% of the patients in the AAM group, which was significantly higher than that in the BMV group (12.2%).

Conclusion

In this study, we found that advanced airway management during prehospital emergency transport by paramedics showed high CCF and ROSC rates and contributed to improving the prognosis of OHCA patients through high-quality resuscitation.

Assessment of chest compression interruptions during advanced cardiac life support

AIM

To identify potentially avoidable factors responsible for chest compression interruptions and to evaluate the influence of chest compression fraction on achieving return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, each resuscitation managed by mobile medical teams from August 1st, 2016, to August 1st, 2018 was video recorded using a body-mounted GoPro camera. The duration of all chest compression interruptions was recorded and chest compression fraction was calculated. All actions causing an interruption of at least 10 s were analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred and six resuscitations of both in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients were analysed. In total 1867 chest compression interruptions were identified. Of these, 623 were longer than 10 s in which a total of 794 actions were performed. In 4.3% of the registered pauses, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was interrupted for more than 60 s. The most performed actions during prolonged interruptions were rhythm/pulse checks (51.6%), installation/use of mechanical chest compression devices (11.1%), cardiopulmonary resuscitation provider switches (6.7%) and ETT placements (6.2%). No statistically significant relationship was found between chest compression fraction and return of spontaneous circulation or survival.

CONCLUSION

The majority of chest compression interruptions during resuscitation were caused by prolonged rhythm checks, cardiopulmonary resuscitation provider switches, incorrect use of mechanical chest compression devices and ETT placement. No association was found between chest compression fraction and return of spontaneous circulation, nor an influence on survival. This was presumably caused by the high baseline chest compression fraction of >86%.

Can hospital adult code-teams and individual members perform high-quality CPR? A multicenter simulation-based study incorporating an educational intervention with CPR feedback

Aims

A multicenter simulation-based research study to assess the ability of interprofessional code-teams and individual members to perform high-quality CPR (HQ-CPR) at baseline and following an educational intervention with a CPR feedback device.

Methods

Five centers recruited ten interprofessional teams of AHA-certified adult code-team members with a goal of 200 participants. Baseline testing of chest compression (CC) quality was measured for all individuals. Teams participated in a baseline simulated cardiac arrest (SCA) where CC quality, chest compression fraction (CCF), and peri-shock pauses were recorded. Teams participated in a standardized HQ-CPR and abbreviated TeamSTEPPS® didactic, then engaged in deliberate practice with a CPR feedback device. Individuals were assessed to determine if they could achieve ≥80% combined rate and depth within 2020 AHA guidelines. Teams completed a second SCA and CPR metrics were recorded. Feedback was disabled for assessments except at one site where real-time CPR feedback was the institutional standard. Linear regression models were used to test for site effect and paired t-tests to evaluate significant score changes. Logistic univariate regression models were used to explore characteristics associated with the individual achieving competency.

Results

Data from 184 individuals and 45 teams were analyzed. Baseline HQ-CPR mean score across all sites was 18.5% for individuals and 13.8% for teams. Post-intervention HQ-CPR mean score was 59.8% for individuals and 37.0% for teams. There was a statistically significant improvement in HQ-CPR mean scores of 41.3% (36.1, 46.5) for individuals and 23.2% (17.1, 29.3) for teams (p < 0.0001). CCF increased at 3 out of 5 sites and there was a mean 5-s reduction in peri-shock pauses (p < 0.0001). Characteristics with a statistically significant association were height (p = 0.01) and number of times performed CPR (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Code-teams and individuals struggle to perform HQ-CPR but show improvement after deliberate practice with feedback as part of an educational intervention. Only one site that incorporated real-time CPR feedback devices routinely achieved ≥80% HQ-CPR.

Shock decision algorithm for use during load distributing band cardiopulmonary resuscitation

AIM

Chest compressions delivered by a load distributing band (LDB) induce artefacts in the electrocardiogram. These artefacts alter shock decisions in defibrillators. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the first reliable shock decision algorithm during LDB compressions.

METHODS

The study dataset comprised 5813 electrocardiogram segments from 896 cardiac arrest patients during LDB compressions. Electrocardiogram segments were annotated by consensus as shockable (1154, 303 patients) or nonshockable (4659, 841 patients). Segments during asystole were used to characterize the LDB artefact and to compare its characteristics to those of manual artefacts from other datasets. LDB artefacts were removed using adaptive filters. A machine learning algorithm was designed for the shock decision after filtering, and its performance was compared to that of a commercial defibrillator's algorithm.

RESULTS

Median (90% confidence interval) compression frequencies were lower and more stable for the LDB than for the manual artefact, 80 min^-1 (79.9-82.9) vs. 104.4 min^-1 (48.5-114.0). The amplitude and waveform regularity (Pearson's correlation coefficient) were larger for the LDB artefact, with 5.5 mV (0.8-23.4) vs. 0.5 mV (0.1-2.2) (p < 0.001) and 0.99 (0.78-1.0) vs. 0.88 (0.55-0.98) (p < 0.001). The shock decision accuracy was significantly higher for the machine learning algorithm than for the defibrillator algorithm, with sensitivity/specificity pairs of 92.1/96.8% (machine learning) vs. 91.4/87.1% (defibrillator) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to other cardiopulmonary resuscitation artefacts, removing the LDB artefact was challenging due to larger amplitudes and lower compression frequencies. The machine learning algorithm achieved clinically reliable shock decisions during LDB compressions.

Multimodal Algorithms for the Classification of Circulation States During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

GOAL

Identifying the circulation state during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is essential to determine what life-saving therapies to apply. Currently algorithms discriminate circulation (pulsed rhythms, PR) from no circulation (pulseless electrical activity, PEA), but PEA can be classified into true (TPEA) and pseudo (PPEA) depending on cardiac contractility. This study introduces multi-class algorithms to automatically determine circulation states during OHCA using the signals available in defibrillators.

METHODS

A cohort of 60 OHCA cases were used to extract a dataset of 2506 5-s segments, labeled as PR (1463), PPEA (364) and TPEA (679) using the invasive blood pressure, experimentally recorded through a radial/femoral cannulation. A multimodal algorithm using features obtained from the electrocardiogram, the thoracic impedance and the capnogram was designed. A random forest model was trained to discriminate three (TPEA/PPEA/PR) and two (PEA/PR) circulation states. The models were evaluated using repeated patient-wise 5-fold cross-validation, with the unweighted mean of sensitivities (UMS) and F ₁-score as performance metrics.

RESULTS

The best model for 3-class had a median (interquartile range, IQR) UMS and F ₁ of 69.0% (68.0-70.1) and 61.7% (61.0-62.5), respectively. The best two class classifier had median (IQR) UMS and F ₁ of 83.9% (82.9-84.5) and 76.2% (75.0-76.9), outperforming all previous proposals in over 3-points in UMS.

CONCLUSIONS

The first multiclass OHCA circulation state classifier was demonstrated. The method improved previous algorithms for binary pulse/no-pulse decisions.

SIGNIFICANCE

Automatic multiclass circulation state classification during OHCA could contribute to improve cardiac arrest therapy and improve survival rates.

Optimizing defibrillation during cardiac arrest

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current cardiac arrest guidelines are based on a fixed, time-based defibrillation strategy. Rhythm analysis and shock delivery (if indicated) are repeated every 2 min requiring cyclical interruptions of chest compressions. This approach has several downsides, such as the need to temporarily stop cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for a variable amount of time, thus reducing myocardial perfusion and decreasing the chance of successful defibrillation. A tailored defibrillation strategy should identify treatment priority for each patient, that is chest compressions (CCS) or defibrillation, minimize CCs interruptions, speed up the delivery of early effective defibrillation and reduce the number of ineffective shocks.

RECENT FINDINGS

Real-time ECG analysis (using adaptive filters, new algorithms robust to chest compressions artifacts and shock-advisory algorithms) is an effective strategy to correctly identify heart rhythm during CPR and reduce the hands-off time preceding a shock. Similarly, ventricular fibrillation waveform analysis, that is amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) represents a well established approach to reserve defibrillation in patients with high chance of shock success and postpone it when ventricular fibrillation termination is unlikely. Both approaches demonstrated valuable results in improving cardiac arrest outcomes in experimental and observational study.

SUMMARY

Real-time ECG analysis and AMSA have the potential to predict ventricular fibrillation termination, return of spontaneous circulation and even survival, with discretely high confidence. Prospective studies are now necessary to validate these new approaches in the clinical scenario.

Assessment of the evolution of end-tidal carbon dioxide within chest compression pauses to detect restoration of spontaneous circulation

Background

Measurement of end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂) can help to monitor circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, early detection of restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during CPR using waveform capnography remains a challenge. The aim of the study was to investigate if the assessment of ETCO₂ variation during chest compression pauses could allow for ROSC detection. We hypothesized that a decay in ETCO₂ during a compression pause indicates no ROSC while a constant or increasing ETCO2 indicates ROSC.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) episodes treated by the advanced life support (ALS). Continuous chest compressions and ventilations were provided manually. Segments of capnography signal during pauses in chest compressions were selected, including at least three ventilations and with durations less than 20 s. Segments were classified as ROSC or non-ROSC according to case chart annotation and examination of the ECG and transthoracic impedance signals. The percentage variation of ETCO₂ between consecutive ventilations was computed and its average value, ΔET_avg, was used as a single feature to discriminate between ROSC and non-ROSC segments.

Results

A total of 384 segments (130 ROSC, 254 non-ROSC) from 205 OHCA patients (30.7% female, median age 66) were analyzed. Median (IQR) duration was 16.3 (12.9,18.1) s. ΔET_avg was 0.0 (-0.7, 0.9)% for ROSC segments and -11.0 (-14.1, -8.0)% for non-ROSC segments (p < 0.0001). Best performance for ROSC detection yielded a sensitivity of 95.4% (95% CI: 90.1%, 98.1%) and a specificity of 94.9% (91.4%, 97.1%) for all ventilations in the segment. For the first 2 ventilations, duration was 7.7 (6.0, 10.2) s, and sensitivity and specificity were 90.0% (83.5%, 94.2%) and 89.4 (84.9%, 92.6%), respectively. Our method allowed for ROSC detection during the first compression pause in 95.4% of the patients.

Conclusion

Average percent variation of ETCO₂ during pauses in chest compressions allowed for ROSC discrimination. This metric could help confirm ROSC during compression pauses in ALS settings.

Impact of Postshock Transcutaneous Pacing on Chest Compression Quality during Resuscitation: A Simulation-Based Pilot Study

Background

Successful defibrillation is commonly followed by a transient nonperfusing state. To provide perfusion in this stagnant phase, chest compressions are recommended irrespective of arrhythmia termination. Implantable cardioverters-defibrillators (ICD) used immediately after delivery of the shock are capable of pacing the heart, and this feature is commonly activated in these devices. Potential utility of external, transcutaneous postshock pacing in patients with SCA in shockable rhythms has not been determined. This study aimed at presenting an impact of a short-term external postshock pacing (ePSP) on a quality of chest compressions (CC) without compromising them.

Methods

The study was designed as a high-fidelity simulation study. Twenty triple-paramedic teams were invited. Participants were asked to take part in a 10-minute adult cardiac arrest scenario with ventricular fibrillation. In the first simulation, paramedics had to resume compressions after each shock (control group). In the second, simultaneous with compressions, one of the rescuers started transcutaneous pacing (TCP) with a current output of 200 mA and a pacer rate of 80 ppm. TCP was finished after 30 seconds (experimental group). The primary outcomes were chest compression fraction (CCF), mean depth and rate of compressions, percent of fully recoiled compressions, and percent of compressions of correct depth and their rate.

Results

In both experimental and control group, CCF, mean depth, and rate were similar (84.65 ± 3.67 vs. 85.45 ± 4.95, p=0.54; 55.75 ± 3.40 vs. 55.25 ± 2.73, p=0.63; 122.70 ± 4.92 vs. 120.80 ± 6.00, p=0.25, respectively). In turn, percent of CC performed in correct depth, rate, and recoil was unsatisfactory in both groups (51.00 ± 17.40 vs. 52.60 ± 18.72, p=0.76; 122.70 ± 4.92 vs. 120.80 ± 6.00, p=0.25, respectively). Small differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, appropriate hand-positioning was observed more frequently in the control group, and this was the only significant difference (95.60 ± 5.32 vs. 99.30 ± 1.59, p=0.006).

Conclusion

This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Introducing an ePSP does not influence relevantly the quality of CC.

Adrenaline to improve survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the PARAMEDIC2 RCT

BACKGROUND

Adrenaline has been used as a treatment for cardiac arrest for many years, despite uncertainty about its effects on long-term outcomes and concerns that it may cause worse neurological outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to evaluate the effects of adrenaline on survival and neurological outcomes, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of adrenaline use.

DESIGN

This was a pragmatic, randomised, allocation-concealed, placebo-controlled, parallel-group superiority trial and economic evaluation. Costs are expressed in Great British pounds and reported in 2016/17 prices.

SETTING

This trial was set in five NHS ambulance services in England and Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults treated for an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were included. Patients were ineligible if they were pregnant, if they were aged < 16 years, if the cardiac arrest had been caused by anaphylaxis or life-threatening asthma, or if adrenaline had already been given.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomised to either adrenaline (1 mg) or placebo in a 1 : 1 allocation ratio by the opening of allocation-concealed treatment packs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was survival to 30 days. The secondary outcomes were survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, survival at 3, 6 and 12 months, neurological outcomes and health-related quality of life through to 6 months. The economic evaluation assessed the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services. Participants, clinical teams and those assessing patient outcomes were masked to the treatment allocation.

RESULTS

From December 2014 to October 2017, 8014 participants were assigned to the adrenaline (n = 4015) or to the placebo (n = 3999) arm. At 30 days, 130 out of 4012 participants (3.2%) in the adrenaline arm and 94 out of 3995 (2.4%) in the placebo arm were alive (adjusted odds ratio for survival 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.97). For secondary outcomes, survival to hospital admission was higher for those receiving adrenaline than for those receiving placebo (23.6% vs. 8.0%; adjusted odds ratio 3.83, 95% confidence interval 3.30 to 4.43). The rate of favourable neurological outcome at hospital discharge was not significantly different between the arms (2.2% vs. 1.9%; adjusted odds ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.68). The pattern of improved survival but no significant improvement in neurological outcomes continued through to 6 months. By 12 months, survival in the adrenaline arm was 2.7%, compared with 2.0% in the placebo arm (adjusted odds ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.92). An adjusted subgroup analysis did not identify significant interactions. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for adrenaline was estimated at £1,693,003 per quality-adjusted life-year gained over the first 6 months after the cardiac arrest event and £81,070 per quality-adjusted life-year gained over the lifetime of survivors. Additional economic analyses estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for adrenaline at £982,880 per percentage point increase in overall survival and £377,232 per percentage point increase in neurological outcomes over the first 6 months after the cardiac arrest.

LIMITATIONS

The estimate for survival with a favourable neurological outcome is imprecise because of the small numbers of patients surviving with a good outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Adrenaline improved long-term survival, but there was no evidence that it significantly improved neurological outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life-year exceeds the threshold of £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year usually supported by the NHS.

FUTURE WORK

Further research is required to better understand patients' preferences in relation to survival and neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and to aid interpretation of the trial findings from a patient and public perspective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73485024 and EudraCT 2014-000792-11.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 25. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Effect on Chest Compression Fraction of Continuous Manual Compressions with Asynchronous Ventilations Using an i-gel® versus 30:2 Approach during Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Manikin Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

The optimal airway management strategy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is uncertain. In the case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, a high chest compression fraction is paramount to obtain the return of spontaneous circulation and improve survival and neurological outcomes. To improve this fraction, providing continuous chest compressions should be more effective than using the conventional 30:2 ratio. Airway management should, however, be adapted, since face-mask ventilation can hardly be carried out while continuous compressions are administered. The early insertion of a supraglottic device could therefore improve the chest compression fraction by allowing ventilation while maintaining compressions. This is a protocol for a multicenter, parallel, randomized simulation study. Depending on randomization, each team made up of paramedics and emergency medical technicians will manage the 10-min scenario according either to the standard approach (30 compressions with two face-mask ventilations) or to the experimental approach (continuous manual compressions with early insertion of an i-gel® supraglottic device to deliver asynchronous ventilations). The primary outcome will be the chest compression fraction during the first two minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Secondary outcomes will be chest compression fraction (per cycle and overall), compressions and ventilations quality, time to first shock and to first ventilation, user satisfaction, and providers' self-assessed cognitive load.

Change in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance Over Time During Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest and the Effect of Just-in-Time Training and Feedback

OBJECTIVES

Effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is critical to ensure optimal outcomes from cardiac arrest, yet trained health care providers consistently struggle to provide guideline-compliant CPR. Rescuer fatigue can impact chest compression (CC) quality during a cardiac arrest event, although it is unknown if visual feedback or just-in-time training influences change of CC quality over time. In this study, we attempt to describe the changes in CC quality over a 12-minute simulated resuscitation and examine the influence of just-in-time training and visual feedback on CC quality over time.

METHODS

We conducted secondary analysis of data collected from the CPRCARES study, a multicenter randomized trial in which CPR-certified health care providers from 10 different pediatric tertiary care centers were randomized to receive visual feedback, just-in-time CPR training, or no intervention. They participated in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario with 2 team members providing CCs. We compared the quality of CCs delivered (depth and rate) at the beginning (0-4 minutes), middle (4-8 minutes), and end (8-12 minutes) of the resuscitation.

RESULTS

There was no significant change in depth over the 3 time intervals in any of the arms. There was a significant increase in rate (128 to 133 CC/min) in the no intervention arm over the scenario duration (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant drop in CC depth over a 12-minute cardiac arrest scenario with 2 team members providing compressions.

Airway strategy and chest compression quality in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial

BACKGROUND

Chest compression (CC) quality is associated with improved out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCA) outcomes. Airway management efforts may adversely influence CC quality. We sought to compare the effects of initial laryngeal tube (LT) and initial endotracheal intubation (ETI) airway management strategies upon chest compression fraction (CCF), rate and interruptions in the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART).

METHODS

We analyzed CPR process files collected from adult OHCA enrolled in PART. We used automated signal processing techniques and a graphical user interface to calculate CC quality measures and defined interruptions as pauses in chest compressions longer than 3 s. We determined CC fraction, rate and interruptions (number and total duration) for the entire resuscitation and compared differences between LT and ETI using t-tests. We repeated the analysis stratified by time before, during and after airway insertion as well as by successive 3-min time segments. We also compared CC quality between single vs. multiple airway insertion attempts, as well as between bag-valve-mask (BVM-only) vs. ETI or LT.

RESULTS

Of 3004 patients enrolled in PART, CPR process data were available for 1996 (1001 LT, 995 ETI). Mean CPR analysis duration were: LT 22.6 ± 10.8 min vs. ETI 25.3 ± 11.3 min (p < 0.001). Mean CC fraction (LT 88% vs. ETI 87%, p = 0.05) and rate (LT 114 vs. ETI 114 compressions per minute (cpm), p = 0.59) were similar between LT and ETI. Median number of CC interruptions were: LT 11 vs. ETI 12 (p = 0.001). Total CC interruption duration was lower for LT than ETI (LT 160 vs. ETI 181 s, p = 0.002); this difference was larger before airway insertion (LT 56 vs. ETI 78 s, p < 0.001). There were no differences in CC quality when stratified by 3-min time epochs.

CONCLUSION

In the PART trial, compared with ETI, LT was associated with shorter total CC interruption duration but not other CC quality measures. CC quality may be associated with OHCA airway management.

Analyzing the heart rhythm during chest compressions: Performance and clinical value of a new AED algorithm

PURPOSE

Automated external defibrillators (AED) prompt the rescuer to stop chest compressions (CC) for ECG analysis during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and clinical benefit of a new AED algorithm (cprINSIGHT), which analyzes ECG and impedance signals during CC, allowing rhythm analysis with ongoing chest compressions.

METHODS

Amsterdam Police and Fire Fighters used a conventional AED in 2016-2017 (control) and an AED with cprINSIGHT in 2018-2019 (intervention). In the intervention AED, cprINSIGHT was activated after the first (conventional) analysis. This algorithm classified the rhythm as "shockable" (S) and "non-shockable" (NS), or "pause needed". Sensitivity for S, specificity for NS with 90% lower confidence limit (LCL), chest compression fractions (CCF) and pre-shock pause were compared between control and intervention cases accounting for multiple observations per patient.

RESULTS

Data from 465 control and 425 intervention cases were analyzed. cprINSIGHT reached a decision during CC in 70% of analyses. Sensitivity of the intervention AED was 96%, (LCL 93%) and specificity was 98% (LCL 97%), both not significantly different from control. Intervention cases had a shorter median pre-shock pause compared to control cases (8 s vs 22 s, p < 0.001) and higher median CCF (86% vs 80%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

AEDs with cprINSIGHT analyzed the ECG during chest compressions in 70% of analyses with 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity when it made a S or a NS decision. Compared to conventional AEDs, cprINSIGHT leads to a significantly shorter pre-shock pause and a significant increase in CCF.

Software annotation of defibrillator files: Ready for prime time?

BACKGROUND

High-quality chest compressions are associated with improved outcomes after cardiac arrest. Defibrillators record important information about chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and can be used in quality-improvement programs. Defibrillator review software can automatically annotate files and measure chest compression metrics. However, evidence is limited regarding the accuracy of such measurements.

OBJECTIVE

To compare chest compression fraction (CCF) and rate measurements made with software annotation vs. manual annotation vs. limited manual annotation of defibrillator files recorded during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) CPR.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study of 100 patients who had CPR for OHCA. We assessed chest compression bioimpedance waveforms from the time of initial CPR until defibrillator removal. A reviewer revised software annotations in two ways: completely manual annotations and limited manual annotations, which marked the beginning and end of CPR and ROSC, but not chest compressions. Measurements were compared for CCF and rate using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis.

RESULTS

Case mean rate showed no significant difference between the methods (108.1-108.6 compressions per minute) and ICC was excellent (>0.90). The case mean (±SD) CCF for software, manual, and limited manual annotation was 0.64 ± 0.19, 0.86 ± 0.07, and 0.81 ± 0.10, respectively. The ICC for manual vs. limited manual annotation of CCF was 0.69 while for individual minute epochs it was 0.83.

CONCLUSION

Software annotation performed very well for chest compression rate. For CCF, the difference between manual and software annotation measurements was clinically important, while manual vs. limited manual annotation were similar with an ICC that was good-to-excellent.

Extended cardiopulmonary resuscitation: from high fidelity simulation scenario to the first clinical applications in Poznan out-of-hospital cardiac arrest program

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients are poor. In some OHCA cases, the reason is potentially reversible cardiac or aortic disease. It was suggested previously that high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) followed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support may improve the grave prognosis of OHCA. However, extended CPR (ECPR) with ECMO application is an extremely invasive and cutting-edge procedure. The purpose of this article is to describe how high-fidelity medical simulation as a safe tool enabled implementation of the complex, multi-stage ECPR procedure.

METHOD

A high fidelity simulation of OHCA in street conditions was prepared and carried out as part of a ECPR procedure implemented in an in-hospital area. The simulation tested communication and collaboration of several medical teams from the pre-hospital to in-hospital phases along with optimal use of equipment in management of a sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) patient.

RESULTS

The critical and weak points of an earlier created scenario were collected into a simulation scenario checklist of ECPR algorithm architecture. A few days later, two ECPR procedures followed by cardiologic interventions for OHCA patients (one pulmonary artery embolectomy for acute pulmonary thrombosis and one percutaneous coronary artery angioplasty with drug eluting stent implantation for acute occlusion of the left anterior descending artery), were performed for the first time in Poland. The protocol was activated five times in the first 2 months of the POHCA Program.

CONCLUSION

High fidelity medical simulation in real-life conditions was confirmed to be a safe, useful tool to test and then implement the novel and complex medical procedures. It enabled to find, analyze and solve the weakest points of the earlier developed theoretical protocol and eventually succeed in clinical application of complete ECPR procedure.

The effect of airway management on CPR quality in the PARAMEDIC2 randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Good quality basic life support (BLS) is associated with improved outcome from cardiac arrest. Chest compression fraction (CCF) is a BLS quality indicator, which may be influenced by the type of airway used. We aimed to assess CCF according to the airway strategy in the PARAMEDIC2 study: no advanced airway, supraglottic airway (SGA), tracheal intubation, or a combination of the two. Our hypothesis was that tracheal intubation was associated with a decrease in the CCF compared with alternative airway management strategies.

METHODS

PARAMEDIC2 was a multicentre double-blinded placebo-controlled trial of adrenaline vs placebo in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Data showing compression rate and ratio from patients recruited by London Ambulance Service (LAS) as part of this study was collated and analysed according to the advanced airway used during the resuscitation attempt.

RESULTS

CPR process data were available from 286/ 2058 (13.9%) of the total patients recruited by LAS. The mean compression rate for the first 5 min of data recording was the same in all groups (P = 0.272) and ranged from 104.2 (95% CI of mean: 100.5, 107.8) min^-1 to 108.0 (95% CI of mean: 105.1, 108.3) min^-1. The mean compression fraction was also similar across all groups (P = 0.159) and ranged between 74.7% and 78.4%. There was no difference in the compression rates and fractions across the airway management groups, regardless of the duration of CPR.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the compression fraction associated with the airway management strategy.

Minimizing Pulse Check Duration Through Educational Video Review

Introduction

The American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) recommend pulse checks of less than 10 seconds. We assessed the effect of video review-based educational feedback on pulse check duration with and without point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS).

Methods

Cameras recorded cases of CPR in the emergency department (ED). Investigators reviewed resuscitation videos for ultrasound use during pulse check, pulse check duration, and compression-fraction ratio. Investigators reviewed health records for patient outcomes. Providers received written feedback regarding pulse check duration and compression-fraction ratio. Researchers reviewed selected videos in multidisciplinary grand round presentations, with research team members facilitating discussion. These presentations highlighted strategies that include the following: limit on pulse check duration; emphasis on compressions; and use of “record, then review” method for pulse checks with POCUS. The primary endpoint was pulse check duration with and without POCUS.

Results

Over 19 months, investigators reviewed 70 resuscitations with a total of 325 pulse checks. The mean pulse check duration was 11.5 ± 8.8 seconds (n = 224) and 13.8 ± 8.6 seconds (n = 101) without and with POCUS, respectively. POCUS pulse checks were significantly longer than those without POCUS (P = 0.001). Mean pulse check duration per three-month block decreased statistically significantly from study onset to the final study period (from 17.2 to 10 seconds [P<0.0001]) overall; decreased from 16.6 to 10.5 seconds (P<0.0001) without POCUS; and with POCUS from 19.8 to 9.88 seconds (P<0.0001) with POCUS. Pulse check times decreased significantly over the study period of educational interventions. The strongest effect size was found in POCUS pulse check duration (P = −0.3640, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Consistent with previous studies, POCUS prolonged pulse checks. Educational interventions were associated with significantly decreased overall pulse-check duration, with an enhanced effect on pulse checks involving POCUS. Performance feedback and video review-based education can improve CPR by increasing chest compression-fraction ratio.