1
|
Doody O, Davidson H, Lombard J. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024:spcare-2023-004573. [PMID: 38519106 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To conduct a scoping review to explore the evidence of the process of do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decision-making. METHODS We conducted a systematic search and review of articles from 1 January 2013 to 6 April 2023 within eight databases. Through multi-disciplinary discussions and content analytical techniques, data were mapped onto a conceptual framework to report the data. RESULTS Search results (n=66 207) were screened by paired reviewers and 58 papers were included in the review. Data were mapped onto concepts/conceptual framework to identify timing of decision-making, evidence of involvement, evidence of discussion, evidence of decision documented, communication and adherence to decision and recommendations from the literature. CONCLUSION The findings provide insights into the barriers and facilitators to DNACPR decision-making, processes and implementation. Barriers arising in DNACPR decision-making related to timing, patient/family input, poor communication, conflicts and ethical uncertainty. Facilitators included ongoing conversation, time to discuss, documentation, flexibility in recording, good communication and a DNACPR policy. Challenges will persist unless substantial changes are made to support and promote examples of good practice. Overall, the review underlined the complexity of DNACPR decision-making and how it is a process shaped by multiple factors including law and policy, resource investment, healthcare professionals, those close to the patient and of central importance, the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Doody
- Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Hope Davidson
- School of Law, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - John Lombard
- School of Law, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vaillancourt C, Charette M, Khorsand S, Shligold E, Lanos C, Dale-Tam J, Tran A, Boyle L, Aucoin S, Maniate J, Meggison H, Hartwick M, Posner G. Impact of a COVID-19 code blue protocol on resuscitation care and CPR quality during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2024; 198:110172. [PMID: 38461888 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the impact of a COVID-19 Code Blue policy on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) processes of care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality metrics, and survival to hospital discharge. METHODS We completed a health record review of consecutive IHCA for which resuscitation was attempted. We report Utstein outcomes and CPR quality metrics 33 months before (July,2017-March,2020) and after (April,2020-December,2022) the implementation of a COVID-19 Code Blue policy requiring all team members to don personal protective equipment including gown, gloves, mask, and eye protection for all IHCA. RESULTS There were 800 IHCA with the following characteristics (Before n = 396; After n = 404): mean age 66, 62.9% male, 81.3% witnessed, 31.3% in the emergency department, 25.6% cardiac cause, and initial shockable rhythm in 16.7%. Among all 404 patients screened for COVID-19, 25 of 288 available test results before IHCA occurred were positive. Comparing the before and after periods: there were relevant time delays (min:sec) in start of chest compressions (0:17vs.0:37;p = 0.005), team arrival (0:43vs.1:21;p = 0.002), 1st rhythm analysis (1:15vs.3:16;p < 0.0001), 1st epinephrine (3:44vs.4:34;p = 0.02), and airway insertion (8:38vs. 10:18;p = 0.02). Resuscitation duration was similar (18:28vs.19:35;p = 0.34). Exception of peri-shock pause which appeared longer (0:06vs.0:14;p = 0.07), chest compression fraction, rate and depth were identical and good. Factors independently associated with survival were age (adjOR 0.98;p < 0.001), male sex (adjOR 1.51;p = 0.048), witnessed (adjOR 2.35;p = 0.02), shockable rhythm (adjOR 3.31;p < 0.0001), hospital location (p = 0.0002), and COVID-19 period (adjOR 0.68;p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 Code Blue policy was associated with delayed processes of care but similarly good CPR quality. The COVID-19 period appeared associated with decreased survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Vaillancourt
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Soha Khorsand
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Chelsea Lanos
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alexandre Tran
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada; Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Loree Boyle
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sylvie Aucoin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jerry Maniate
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada; Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Hilary Meggison
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Hartwick
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Glenn Posner
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Osterman E, Jakobsson S, Larsson C, Linder F. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care for acute cholecystitis: a Swedish multicentre retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e078407. [PMID: 38035739 PMCID: PMC10689379 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The present study aimed to investigate if and how the panorama of acute cholecystitis changed in 2020 in Sweden. Seven aspects were identified, the incidence of cholecystitis, the Tokyo grade, the timing of diagnosis and treatment, the proportion treated with early surgery, the proportion of patients treated with delayed surgery, and new complications from gallstones. DESIGN Retrospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING 3 hospitals in Sweden, covering 675 000 inhabitants. PARTICIPANTS 1634 patients with cholecystitis. OUTCOMES The incidence, treatment choice and diagnostic and treatment delay were investigated by comparing prepandemic and pandemic patients. RESULTS Patients diagnosed with cholecystitis during the pandemic were more comorbid (American Society of Anesthesiologists 2-5, 86% vs 81%, p=0.01) and more often had a diagnostic CT (67% vs 59%, p=0.01). There were variations in the number of patients corresponding with the pandemic waves, but there was no overall increase in the number of patients with cholecystitis (78 vs 76 cases/100 000 inhabitants, p=0.7) or the proportion of patients treated with surgery during the pandemic (50% vs 50%, p=0.4). There was no increase in time to admission from symptoms (both median 1 day, p=0.7), or surgery from admission (both median 1 day, p=0.9). The proportion of grades 2-3 cholecystitis was not higher during the pandemic (46% vs 44%, p=0.9). The median time to elective surgery increased (184 days vs 130 days, p=0.04), but there was no increase in new gallstone complications (35% vs 39%, p=0.3). CONCLUSION Emergency surgery for cholecystitis was not impacted by the pandemic in Sweden. Patients were more comorbid but did not have more severe cholecystitis nor was there a delay in seeking care. Fewer patients non-operatively managed had elective surgery within 6 months of their initial diagnosis but there was no corresponding increase in gallstone complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Osterman
- CKF Gävleborg, Uppsala University, Gävle, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Gävle Sjukhus, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Sofia Jakobsson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Fredrik Linder
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Younan S, Cardona M, Sahay A, Willis E, Ni Chroinin D. Advanced care planning in the early phase of COVID-19: a rapid review of the practice and policy lessons learned. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1242413. [PMID: 37780404 PMCID: PMC10541151 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1242413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Background The importance of advance care planning (ACP) has been highlighted by the advent of life-threatening COVID-19. Anecdotal evidence suggests changes in implementation of policies and procedures is needed to support uptake of ACPs. We investigated the barriers and enablers of ACP in the COVID-19 context and identify recommendations to facilitate ACP, to inform future policy and practice. Methods We adopted the WHO recommendation of using rapid reviews for the production of actionable evidence for this study. We searched PUBMED from January 2020 to April 2021. All study designs including commentaries were included that focused on ACPs during COVID-19. Preprints/unpublished papers and Non-English language articles were excluded. Titles and abstracts were screened, full-texts were reviewed, and discrepancies resolved by discussion until consensus. Results From amongst 343 papers screened, 123 underwent full-text review. In total, 74 papers were included, comprising commentaries (39) and primary research studies covering cohorts, reviews, case studies, and cross-sectional designs (35). The various study types and settings such as hospitals, outpatient services, aged care and community indicated widespread interest in accelerating ACP documentation to facilitate management decisions and care which is unwanted/not aligned with goals. Enablers of ACP included targeted public awareness, availability of telehealth, easy access to online tools and adopting person-centered approach, respectful of patient autonomy and values. The emerging barriers were uncertainty regarding clinical outcomes, cultural and communication difficulties, barriers associated with legal and ethical considerations, infection control restrictions, lack of time, and limited resources and support systems. Conclusion The pandemic has provided opportunities for rapid implementation of ACP in creative ways to circumvent social distancing restrictions and high demand for health services. This review suggests the pandemic has provided some impetus to drive adaptable ACP conversations at individual, local, and international levels, affording an opportunity for longer term improvements in ACP practice and patient care. The enablers of ACP and the accelerated adoption evident here will hopefully continue to be part of everyday practice, with or without the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Younan
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Magnolia Cardona
- Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Ashlyn Sahay
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Mackay, QLD, Australia
| | - Eileen Willis
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Mackay, QLD, Australia
| | - Danielle Ni Chroinin
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jacobson E, Troost JP, Epler K, Lenhan B, Rodgers L, O'Callaghan T, Painter N, Barrett J. Change in Code Status Orders of Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19 Throughout the Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:1188-1197. [PMID: 37022771 PMCID: PMC10623069 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Our aim was to examine how code status orders for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 changed over time as the pandemic progressed and outcomes improved. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed at a single academic center in the United States. Adults admitted between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, who tested positive for COVID-19, were included. The study period included four institutional hospitalization surges. Demographic and outcome data were collected and code status orders during admission were trended. Data were analyzed with multivariable analysis to identify predictors of code status. Results: A total of 3615 patients were included with full code (62.7%) being the most common final code status order followed by do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) (18.1%). Time of admission (per every six months) was an independent predictor of final full compared to DNAR/partial code status (p = 0.04). Limited resuscitation preference (DNAR or partial) decreased from over 20% in the first two surges to 10.8% and 15.6% of patients in the last two surges. Other independent predictors of final code status included body mass index (p < 0.05), Black versus White race (0.64, p = 0.01), time spent in the intensive care unit (4.28, p = <0.001), age (2.11, p = <0.001), and Charlson comorbidity index (1.05, p = <0.001). Conclusions: Over time, adults admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 were less likely to have a DNAR or partial code status order with persistent decrease occurring after March 2021. A trend toward decreased code status documentation as the pandemic progressed was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Jacobson
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jonathan P. Troost
- Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Katharine Epler
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Blair Lenhan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Lily Rodgers
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Thomas O'Callaghan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Natalia Painter
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Julie Barrett
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mentzelopoulos SD, Chalkias A. Resuscitation preferences of the elderly: implications for the need for regularly repeated end-of-life discussions. Resuscitation 2023:109877. [PMID: 37331564 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Spyros D Mentzelopoulos
- First Department of Intensive Care Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
| | - Athanasios Chalkias
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McGuigan PJ, Edwards J, Blackwood B, Dark P, Doidge JC, Harrison DA, Kitchen G, Lawson I, Nichol AD, Rowan KM, Shankar-Hari M, McAuley DF, McGuigan PJ. The association between time of in hospital cardiac arrest and mortality; a retrospective analysis of two UK databases. Resuscitation 2023; 186:109750. [PMID: 36842674 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The incidence of in hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) varies throughout the day. This study aimed to report the variation in incidence of IHCA, presenting rhythm and outcome based on the hour in which IHCA occurred. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of the National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA) including patients who suffered an IHCA from 1st April 2011 to 31st December 2019. We then linked the NCAA and intensive care Case Mix Programme databases to explore the effect of time of IHCA on hospital survival in the subgroup of patients admitted to intensive care following IHCA. RESULTS We identified 115,690 eligible patients in the NCAA database. Pulseless electrical activity was the commonest presenting rhythm (54.8%). 66,885 patients died in the immediate post resuscitation period. Overall, hospital survival in the NCAA cohort was 21.3%. We identified 13,858 patients with linked ICU admissions in the Case Mix Programme database; 37.0% survived to hospital discharge. The incidence of IHCA peaked at 06.00. Rates of return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital discharge and good neurological outcome were lowest between 05.00 and 07.00. Among those admitted to ICU, no clear diurnal variation in hospital survival was seen in the unadjusted or adjusted analysis. This pattern was consistent across all presenting rhythms. CONCLUSIONS We observed higher rates of IHCA, and poorer outcomes at night. However, in those admitted to ICU, this variation was absent. This suggests patient factors and processes of care issues contribute to the variation in IHCA seen throughout the day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J McGuigan
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK; Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, UK.
| | - Julia Edwards
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, UK
| | - Paul Dark
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James C Doidge
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - David A Harrison
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Gareth Kitchen
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Izabella Lawson
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Alistair D Nichol
- University College Dublin Clinical Research Centre, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kathryn M Rowan
- Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Napier House, 24 High Holborn, London, UK
| | - Manu Shankar-Hari
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute of Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, UK; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, UK
| | - Danny F McAuley
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK; Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, UK
| | - Peter J McGuigan
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK; Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kiker WA, Cheng S, Pollack LR, Creutzfeldt CJ, Kross EK, Curtis JR, Belden KA, Melamed R, Armaignac DL, Heavner SF, Christie AB, Banner-Goodspeed VM, Khanna AK, Sili U, Anderson HL, Kumar V, Walkey A, Kashyap R, Gajic O, Domecq JP, Khandelwal N. Admission Code Status and End-of-life Care for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 64:359-369. [PMID: 35764202 PMCID: PMC9233554 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted variability in intensity of care. We aimed to characterize intensity of care among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. OBJECTIVES Examine the prevalence and predictors of admission code status, palliative care consultation, comfort-measures-only orders, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS This cross-sectional study examined data from an international registry of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. A proportional odds model evaluated predictors of more aggressive code status (i.e., Full Code) vs. less (i.e., Do Not Resuscitate, DNR). Among decedents, logistic regression was used to identify predictors of palliative care consultation, comfort measures only, and CPR at time of death. RESULTS We included 29,923 patients across 179 sites. Among those with admission code status documented, Full Code was selected by 90% (n = 15,273). Adjusting for site, Full Code was more likely for patients who were of Black or Asian race (ORs 1.82, 95% CIs 1.5-2.19; 1.78, 1.15-3.09 respectively, relative to White race), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.89, CI 1.35-2.32), and male sex (OR 1.16, CI 1.0-1.33). Of the 4951 decedents, 29% received palliative care consultation, 59% transitioned to comfort measures only, and 29% received CPR, with non-White racial and ethnic groups less likely to receive comfort measures only and more likely to receive CPR. CONCLUSION In this international cohort of patients with COVID-19, Full Code was the initial code status in the majority, and more likely among patients who were Black or Asian race, Hispanic ethnicity or male. These results provide direction for future studies to improve these disparities in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney A Kiker
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine (W.A.K., L.R.P., E.K.K., J.R.C., ), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Si Cheng
- Department of Biostatistics (S.C.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lauren R Pollack
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine (W.A.K., L.R.P., E.K.K., J.R.C., ), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Claire J Creutzfeldt
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Neurology, Harborview Medical Center (C.J.C.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Erin K Kross
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine (W.A.K., L.R.P., E.K.K., J.R.C., ), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine (W.A.K., L.R.P., E.K.K., J.R.C., ), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katherine A Belden
- Division of Infectious Diseases (K.A.B.), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Roman Melamed
- Abbott Northwestern Hospital (R.M.), Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Donna Lee Armaignac
- Center for Advanced Analytics (D.L.A.), Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Smith F Heavner
- Department of Public Health Sciences (S.F.H.), Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Amy B Christie
- Department of Critical Care (A.B.C.), Atrium Health Navicent, Macon, GA, USA
| | - Valerie M Banner-Goodspeed
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (V.M.B-G.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ashish K Khanna
- Department of Anesthesiology, Section on Critical Care Medicine (A.K.K.), Perioperative Outcomes and Informatics Collaborative (POIC), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Outcomes Research Consortium (A.K.K.), Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Uluhan Sili
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, School of Medicine (U.S.), Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Harry L Anderson
- Department of Surgery (H.L.A.), St Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Vishakha Kumar
- Society of Critical Medicine (V.K.), Mount Prospect, IL, USA
| | - Allan Walkey
- The Pulmonary Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, and Evans Center of Implementation and Improvement Sciences, Department of Medicine (A.W.), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rahul Kashyap
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (R.K., O.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ognjen Gajic
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (R.K., O.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Juan Pablo Domecq
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension (J.P.D.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Critical Care Medicine (J.P.D.), Mayo Clinic, Mankato, MN, USA
| | - Nita Khandelwal
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Subramaniam A, Tiruvoipati R, Pilcher D, Bailey M. Treatment limitations and clinical outcomes in critically ill frail patients with and without COVID-19 pneumonitis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 71:145-156. [PMID: 36151970 PMCID: PMC9539196 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of treatment limitations in patients with frailty at intensive care unit (ICU) admission is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the presence and predictors of treatment limitations in patients with and without COVID-19 pneumonitis in those admitted to Australian and New Zealand ICUs. METHODS This registry-based multicenter, retrospective cohort study included all frail adults (≥16 years) with documented clinical frailty scale (CFS) scores, admitted to ICUs with admission diagnostic codes for viral pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) over 2 years between January 01, 2020 and December 31, 2021. Frail patients (CFS ≥5) coded as having viral pneumonitis or ARDS due to COVID-19 were compared to those with other causes of viral pneumonitis or ARDS for documented treatment limitations. RESULTS 884 frail patients were included in the final analysis from 129 public and private ICUs. 369 patients (41.7%) had confirmed COVID-19. There were more male patients in COVID-19 (55.3% vs 47.0%; p = 0.015). There were no differences in age or APACHE-III scores between the two groups. Overall, 36.0% (318/884) had treatment limitations, but similar between the two groups (35.8% [132/369] vs 36.1% [186/515]; p = 0.92). After adjusting for confounders, increasing frailty (OR = 1.72; 95%-CI 1.39-2.14), age (OR = 1.05; 95%-CI 1.04-1.06), and presence of chronic respiratory condition (OR = 1.58; 95%-CI 1.10-2.27) increased the likelihood of instituting treatment limitations. However, the presence of COVID-19 by itself did not influence treatment limitations (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39; 95%-CI 0.98-1.96). CONCLUSIONS The proportion of treatment limitations was similar in patients with frailty with or without COVID-19 pneumonitis at ICU admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Subramaniam
- Department of Intensive CarePeninsula HealthFrankstonVictoriaAustralia,Peninsula Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityFrankstonVictoriaAustralia,Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Ravindranath Tiruvoipati
- Department of Intensive CarePeninsula HealthFrankstonVictoriaAustralia,Peninsula Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityFrankstonVictoriaAustralia,Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - David Pilcher
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia,Centre for Outcome and Resource EvaluationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care SocietyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia,Department of Intensive CareAlfred HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Michael Bailey
- Centre for Outcome and Resource EvaluationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care SocietyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mentzelopoulos SD, Couper K, Raffay V, Djakow J, Bossaert L. Evolution of European Resuscitation and End-of-Life Practices from 2015 to 2019: A Survey-Based Comparative Evaluation. J Clin Med 2022; 11:4005. [PMID: 35887769 PMCID: PMC9316602 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In concordance with the results of large, observational studies, a 2015 European survey suggested variation in resuscitation/end-of-life practices and emergency care organization across 31 countries. The current survey-based study aimed to comparatively assess the evolution of practices from 2015 to 2019, especially in countries with "low" (i.e., average or lower) 2015 questionnaire domain scores. METHODS The 2015 questionnaire with additional consensus-based questions was used. The 2019 questionnaire covered practices/decisions related to end-of-life care (domain A); determinants of access to resuscitation/post-resuscitation care (domain B); diagnosis of death/organ donation (domain C); and emergency care organization (domain D). Responses from 25 countries were analyzed. Positive or negative responses were graded by 1 or 0, respectively. Domain scores were calculated by summation of practice-specific response grades. RESULTS Domain A and B scores for 2015 and 2019 were similar. Domain C score decreased by 1 point [95% confidence interval (CI): 1-3; p = 0.02]. Domain D score increased by 2.6 points (95% CI: 0.2-5.0; p = 0.035); this improvement was driven by countries with "low" 2015 domain D scores. In countries with "low" 2015 domain A scores, domain A score increased by 5.5 points (95% CI: 0.4-10.6; p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS In 2019, improvements in emergency care organization and an increasing frequency of end-of-life practices were observed primarily in countries with previously "low" scores in the corresponding domains of the 2015 questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyros D. Mentzelopoulos
- First Department of Intensive Care Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Evaggelismos General Hospital, 45-47 Ipsilandou Street, 10675 Athens, Greece
| | - Keith Couper
- UK Critical Care Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK;
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Violetta Raffay
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus;
- Serbian Resuscitation Council, 21102 Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Jana Djakow
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, NH Hospital, 26801 Hořovice, Czech Republic;
- Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Epler K, Lenhan B, O'Callaghan T, Painter N, Troost J, Barrett J, Jacobson E. If Your Heart Were to Stop: Characterization and Comparison of Code Status Orders in Adult Patients Admitted with COVID-19. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:888-896. [PMID: 34967678 PMCID: PMC9145568 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Our aim is to characterize code status documentation for patients hospitalized with novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) during the first peak of the pandemic, when prognosis, resource availability, and provider safety were uncertain. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed at a single tertiary academic medical center. Adult patients admitted between March 1, 2020 and October 31, 2020 who tested positive for COVID-19 were included. Demographic and hospital outcome data were collected. Code status orders during this admission and prior admissions were trended. Data were analyzed with multivariable analysis to identify predictors of code status choice. Results: A total of 720 patients were included. The majority (70%) were full code and 12% were in do-not-attempt resuscitation (DNAR) status on admission; by discharge, 20% were DNAR. Age (p < 0.001), time in the intensive care unit (ICU) (p < 0.001), and having Medicaid (p = 0.04) compared to private insurance were predictors of DNAR. Fourteen percent had no code status order. Older age (p < 0.001), time in the ICU (p = 0.01), and admission to a teaching service (p < 0.001) were associated with having an order. Of patients with a prior admission (n = 227), 33.5% previously had no code status order and 44.5% had a different code status for their COVID-19 admission. Of those with a change, most transitioned to less aggressive resuscitation preferences. Conclusions: Most patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in our study elected to be full code. Almost half of patients with prepandemic admissions had a different code status during their COVID-19 admission, with a trend toward less aggressive resuscitation preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine Epler
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Blair Lenhan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thomas O'Callaghan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Natalia Painter
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jonathan Troost
- Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Julie Barrett
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Emily Jacobson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Subramaniam A, Pilcher D, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson J, Mitchell H, Xu D, Bailey M. Timely goals of care documentation in patients with frailty in the COVID-19 era: a retrospective multi-site study. Intern Med J 2022; 52:935-943. [PMID: 34935268 DOI: 10.1111/imj.15671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older frail patients are more likely to have timely goals of care (GOC) documentation than non-frail patients. AIMS To investigate whether timely documentation of GOC within 72 h differed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020), compared with the pre-COVID-19 era (2019) for older frail patients. METHODS Multi-site retrospective cohort study was conducted in two public hospitals where all consecutive frail adult patients aged ≥65 years were admitted under medical units for at least 24 h between 1 March 31 and October in 2019 and between 1 March and 31 October 2020 were included. The GOC was derived from electronic records. Frailty status was derived from hospital coding data using hospital frailty risk score (frail ≥5). The primary outcome was the documentation of GOC within 72 h of hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included hospital mortality, rapid response call, intensive care unit admission, prolonged hospital length of stay (≥10 days) and time to the documentation of GOC. RESULTS The study population comprised 2021 frail patients admitted in 2019 and 1849 admitted in 2020, aged 81.2 and 90.9 years respectively. The proportion of patients with timely GOC was lower in 2020, than 2019 (48.3% (893/1849) vs 54.9% (1109/2021); P = 0.021). After adjusting for confounding factors, patients in 2020 were less likely to receive timely GOC (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.88). Overall time to GOC documentation was longer in 2020 (hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.93). CONCLUSION Timely GOC documentation occurred less frequently in frail patients during the COVID-19 pandemic than in the pre-COVID-19 era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Subramaniam
- Department of Intensive Care, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Pilcher
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ravindranath Tiruvoipati
- Department of Intensive Care, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Wilson
- Department of Information Technology, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hayden Mitchell
- Department of Medicine, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dan Xu
- Department of Medicine, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Bailey
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Do-Not-Attempt-Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions in patients admitted through the emergency department in a Swedish University Hospital – An observational study of outcome, patient characteristics and changes in DNACPR decisions. Resusc Plus 2022; 9:100209. [PMID: 35169759 PMCID: PMC8829126 DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims The aims were to examine patient and hospital characteristics associated with Do-Not-Attempt-Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions for adult admissions through the emergency department (ED), for patients with DNACPR decisions to examine patient and hospital characteristics associated with hospital mortality, and to explore changes in CPR status. Methods This was a retrospective observational study of adult patients admitted through the ED at Karolinska University Hospital 1 January to 31 October 2015. Results The cohort included 25,646 ED admissions, frequency of DNACPR decisions was 11% during hospitalisation. Patients with DNACPR decisions were older, with an overall higher burden of chronic comorbidities, unstable triage scoring, hospital mortality and one-year mortality compared to those without. For patients with DNACPR decisions, 63% survived to discharge and one-year mortality was 77%. Age and comorbidities for patients with DNACPR decisions were similar regardless of hospital mortality, those who died showed signs of more severe acute illness on ED arrival. Change in CPR status during hospitalisation was 5% and upon subsequent admission 14%. For patients discharged with DNACPR decisions, reversal of DNACPR status upon subsequent admission was 32%, with uncertainty as to whether this reversal was active or a consequence of a lack of consideration. Conclusion For a mixed population of adults admitted through the ED, frequency of DNACPR decisions was 11%. Two-thirds of patients with DNACPR decisions were discharged, but one-year mortality was high. For patients discharged with DNACPR decisions, reversal of DNACPR status was substantial and this should merit further attention.
Collapse
|
14
|
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on in-hospital cardiac arrests in the UK. Resuscitation 2022; 173:4-11. [PMID: 35151777 PMCID: PMC8828439 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Aims To compare in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) rates and patient outcomes during the first COVID-19 wave in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2020 with the same period in previous years. Methods A retrospective, multicentre cohort study of 154 UK hospitals that participate in the National Cardiac Arrest Audit and have intensive care units participating in the Case Mix Programme national audit of intensive care. Hospital burden of COVID-19 was defined by the number of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection admitted to critical care per 10,000 hospital admissions. Results 16,474 patients with IHCA where a resuscitation team attended were included. Patients admitted to hospital during 2020 were younger, more often male, and of non-white ethnicity compared with 2016–2019. A decreasing trend in IHCA rates between 2016 and 2019 was reversed in 2020. Hospitals with higher burden of COVID-19 had the greatest difference in IHCA rates (21.8 per 10,000 admissions in April 2020 vs 14.9 per 10,000 in April 2019). The proportions of patients achieving ROSC ≥ 20 min and surviving to hospital discharge were lower in 2020 compared with 2016–19 (46.2% vs 51.2%; and 21.9% vs 22.9%, respectively). Among patients with IHCA, higher hospital burden of COVID-19 was associated with reduced survival to hospital discharge (OR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.93 to 0.98; p < 0.001). Conclusions In comparison with 2016–2019, the first COVID-19 wave in 2020 was associated with a higher rate of IHCA and decreased survival among patients attended by resuscitation teams. These changes were greatest in hospitals with the highest COVID-19 burden.
Collapse
|
15
|
De Georgia M. The intersection of prognostication and code status in patients with severe brain injury. J Crit Care 2022; 69:153997. [PMID: 35114602 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.153997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Accurately estimating the prognosis of brain injury patients can be difficult, especially early in their course. Prognostication is important because it largely determines the care level we provide, from aggressive treatment for patients we predict could have a good outcome to withdrawal of treatment for those we expect will have a poor outcome. Accurate prognostication is required for ethical decision-making. However, several studies have shown that prognostication is frequently inaccurate and variable. Overly optimistic prognostication can lead to false hope and futile care. Overly pessimistic prognostication can lead to therapeutic nihilism. Overlapping is the powerful effect that cognitive biases, in particular code status, can play in shaping our perceptions and the care level we provide. The presence of Do Not Resuscitate orders has been shown to be associated with increased mortality. Based on a comprehensive search of peer-reviewed journals using a wide range of key terms, including prognostication, critical illness, brain injury, cognitive bias, and code status, the following is a review of prognostic accuracy and the effect of code status on outcome. Because withdrawal of treatment is the most common cause of death in the ICU, a clearer understanding of this intersection of prognostication and code status is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael De Georgia
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pel-Littel RE, Stekelenburg DE, Willems HC, Jansen SW, Festen J, van der Linden CM. Lessons Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic as Experienced by Older Adults Treated for COVID-19. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2022; 8:23337214221086831. [PMID: 35368456 PMCID: PMC8965280 DOI: 10.1177/23337214221086831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In order to provide the best care, the perspective of older COVID-19 patients must be involved in the development of treatment protocols. This study describes the experiences of older adults affected by COVID-19 who recovered in the hospital or at home. Methods Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 older adults affected by COVID-19. A content-based thematic analysis was conducted. Results Nine categories were identified as recurring topics, which were grouped into three major themes. The first theme describes experiences in the first phase of the disease when older adults fell ill. The second theme includes experiences during the illness, ranging from illness severity to participation in decision-making, communication barriers and isolation effects. The final theme covers the recovery course, residual symptoms and social aspects. Conclusion Older adults treated for COVID-19 experienced a feeling of being in a fast-paced whirlwind and lost total control over the situation. Extra attention should be paid to shared decision making, coordinated information provision and the instalment of a primary contract to the patient. The uncertainty of their situation, isolation measures and fears could result in psychological consequences and hinder rehabilitation in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hanna C. Willems
- Department of Internal Medicine,
Section Geriatrics, Amsterdam University Medical Center,
Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
O'Donnell SB, Bone AE, Finucane AM, McAleese J, Higginson IJ, Barclay S, Sleeman KE, Murtagh FE. Changes in mortality patterns and place of death during the COVID-19 pandemic: A descriptive analysis of mortality data across four nations. Palliat Med 2021; 35:1975-1984. [PMID: 34425717 PMCID: PMC8641034 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211040981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding patterns of mortality and place of death during the COVID-19 pandemic is important to help provide appropriate services and resources. AIMS To analyse patterns of mortality including place of death in the United Kingdom (UK) (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) during the COVID-19 pandemic to date. DESIGN Descriptive analysis of UK mortality data between March 2020 and March 2021. Weekly number of deaths was described by place of death, using the following definitions: (1) expected deaths: average expected deaths estimated using historical data (2015-19); (2) COVID-19 deaths: where COVID-19 is mentioned on the death certificate; (3) additional non-COVID-19 deaths: above expected but not attributed to COVID-19; (4) baseline deaths: up to and including expected deaths but excluding COVID-19 deaths. RESULTS During the analysis period, 798,643 deaths were registered in the UK, of which 147,282 were COVID-19 deaths and 17,672 were additional non-COVID-19 deaths. While numbers of people who died in care homes and hospitals increased above expected only during the pandemic waves, the numbers of people who died at home remained above expected both during and between the pandemic waves, with an overall increase of 41%. CONCLUSIONS Where people died changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an increase in deaths at home during and between pandemic waves. This has implications for planning and organisation of palliative care and community services. The extent to which these changes will persist longer term remains unclear. Further research could investigate whether this is reflected in other countries with high COVID-19 mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean B O'Donnell
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Anna E Bone
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Jenny McAleese
- Patient and Public Involvement Partner, York Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Barclay
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katherine E Sleeman
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Fliss Em Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Reschen ME, Bowen J, Novak A, Giles M, Singh S, Lasserson D, O'Callaghan CA. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department attendances and acute medical admissions. BMC Emerg Med 2021; 21:143. [PMID: 34800973 PMCID: PMC8605447 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-021-00529-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To better understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital healthcare, we studied activity in the emergency department (ED) and acute medicine department of a major UK hospital. METHODS Electronic patient records for all adult patients attending ED (n = 243,667) or acute medicine (n = 82,899) during the pandemic (2020-2021) and prior year (2019) were analysed and compared. We studied parameters including severity, primary diagnoses, co-morbidity, admission rate, length of stay, bed occupancy, and mortality, with a focus on non-COVID-19 diseases. RESULTS During the first wave of the pandemic, daily ED attendance fell by 37%, medical admissions by 30% and medical bed occupancy by 27%, but all returned to normal within a year. ED attendances and medical admissions fell across all age ranges; the greatest reductions were seen for younger adults in ED attendances, but in older adults for medical admissions. Compared to non-COVID-19 pandemic admissions, COVID-19 admissions were enriched for minority ethnic groups, for dementia, obesity and diabetes, but had lower rates of malignancy. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, non-COVID-19 pandemic admissions had more hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, liver disease, and obesity. There were fewer low severity ED attendances during the pandemic and fewer medical admissions across all severity categories. There were fewer ED attendances with common non-respiratory illnesses including cardiac diagnoses, but no change in cardiac arrests. COVID-19 was the commonest diagnosis amongst medical admissions during the first wave and there were fewer diagnoses of pneumonia, myocardial infarction, heart failure, cellulitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, urinary tract infection and other sepsis, but not stroke. Levels had rebounded by a year later with a trend to higher levels of stroke than before the pandemic. During the pandemic first wave, 7-day mortality was increased for ED attendances, but not for non-COVID-19 medical admissions. CONCLUSIONS Reduced ED attendances in the first wave of the pandemic suggest opportunities for reducing low severity presentations to ED in the future, but also raise the possibility of harm from delayed or missed care. Reassuringly, recent rises in attendance and admissions indicate that any deterrent effect of the pandemic on attendance is diminishing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Reschen
- Department of Acute General Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, OX3 9DU, Oxford, UK.
| | - Jordan Bowen
- Department of Acute General Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, OX3 9DU, Oxford, UK
| | - Alex Novak
- Emergency Medicine Research Oxford (EMROx), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Matthew Giles
- Department of Acute General Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, OX3 9DU, Oxford, UK
| | - Sudhir Singh
- Department of Acute General Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, OX3 9DU, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Lasserson
- Department of Acute General Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, OX3 9DU, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher A O'Callaghan
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Briedé S, van Goor HMR, de Hond TAP, van Roeden SE, Staats JM, Oosterheert JJ, van den Bos F, Kaasjager KAH. Code status documentation at admission in COVID-19 patients: a descriptive cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050268. [PMID: 34758991 PMCID: PMC8587534 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic pressurised healthcare with increased shortage of care. This resulted in an increase of awareness for code status documentation (ie, whether limitations to specific life-sustaining treatments are in place), both in the medical field and in public media. However, it is unknown whether the increased awareness changed the prevalence and content of code status documentation for COVID-19 patients. We aim to describe differences in code status documentation between infectious patients before the pandemic and COVID-19 patients. SETTING University Medical Centre of Utrecht, a tertiary care teaching academic hospital in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1715 patients were included, 129 in the COVID-19 cohort (a cohort of COVID-19 patients, admitted from March 2020 to June 2020) and 1586 in the pre-COVID-19 cohort (a cohort of patients with (suspected) infections admitted between September 2016 to September 2018). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES We described frequency of code status documentation, frequency of discussion of this code status with patient and/or family, and content of code status. RESULTS Frequencies of code status documentation (69.8% vs 72.7%, respectively) and discussion (75.6% vs 73.3%, respectively) were similar in both cohorts. More patients in the COVID-19 cohort than in the before COVID-19 cohort had any treatment limitation as opposed to full code (40% vs 25%). Within the treatment limitations, 'no intensive care admission' (81% vs 51%) and 'no intubation' (69% vs 40%) were more frequently documented in the COVID-19 cohort. A smaller difference was seen in 'other limitation' (17% vs 9%), while 'no resuscitation' (96% vs 92%) was comparable between both periods. CONCLUSION We observed no difference in the frequency of code status documentation or discussion in COVID-19 patients opposed to a pre-COVID-19 cohort. However, treatment limitations were more prevalent in patients with COVID-19, especially 'no intubation' and 'no intensive care admission'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Briedé
- Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Harriet M R van Goor
- Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Titus A P de Hond
- Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja E van Roeden
- Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith M Staats
- Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Jelrik Oosterheert
- Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Karin A H Kaasjager
- Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Killeen E, O'Keeffe H, Lynch O, O'Brien H. Moving Towards 'Goals of Care' Plans for all Hospital Inpatients. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2021; 7:23337214211046085. [PMID: 34708147 PMCID: PMC8543688 DOI: 10.1177/23337214211046085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Killeen
- Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co Louth, Ireland
| | | | - Olwyn Lynch
- Consultant Geriatrician and Medical Physician, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co Louth, Ireland
| | - Helen O'Brien
- Consultant Geriatrician and Medical Physician, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co Louth, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Walker J, Burke K, Wanat M, Hobbs H, Rocroi I, Sharpe M. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions for older medical inpatients: a cohort study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2021-003084. [PMID: 34493534 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A decision not to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiorespiratory arrest requires a discussion between the doctor and the patient and/or their relatives. We aimed to determine how many older patients admitted to acute medical wards had a pre-existing 'do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation' (DNACPR) decision, how many had one recorded on the ward and how many of those who died had a DNACPR decision in place. METHODS A prospective cohort study, using data from medical records, of 481 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years admitted to the six acute medical wards of the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. RESULTS 105/481 (22%) had a DNACPR decision at ward admission, 30 of which had been made in the emergency unit. A further 45 decisions were recorded on the ward, mostly after discussion with relatives. Of the 37 patients who died, 36 had a DNACPR decision. For the 20 deceased patients whose DNACPR decision was recorded during their admission, the median time from documentation to death was 4 days with 7/20 (35%) recorded the day before death. CONCLUSIONS Older patients with multimorbidity need the opportunity to discuss the role of CPR earlier in their care and preferably before acute hospital admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Walker
- Psychological Medicine Research, University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, UK
| | - Katy Burke
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Palliative Care Team, London, UK
| | - Marta Wanat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Harriet Hobbs
- Psychological Medicine Research, University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, UK
| | - Isabelle Rocroi
- Psychological Medicine Research, University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Sharpe
- Psychological Medicine Research, University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sutton L, Goodacre S, Thomas B, Connelly S. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions in people admitted with suspected COVID-19: Secondary analysis of the PRIEST observational cohort study. Resuscitation 2021; 164:130-138. [PMID: 33961960 PMCID: PMC8095017 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of adults admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19 according to their DNACPR decisions, and identify factors associated with DNACPR decisions. METHODS We undertook a secondary analysis of 13,977 adults admitted to hospital with suspected COVID-19 and included in the Pandemic Respiratory Infection Emergency System Triage (PRIEST) study. We recorded presenting characteristics and outcomes (death or organ support) up to 30 days. We categorised patients as early DNACPR (before or on the day of admission) or late/no DNACPR (no DNACPR or occurring after the day of admission). We undertook descriptive analysis comparing these groups and multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of early DNACPR. RESULTS We excluded 1249 with missing DNACPR data, and identified 3929/12748 (31%) with an early DNACPR decision. They had higher mortality (40.7% v 13.1%) and lower use of any organ support (11.6% v 15.7%), but received a range of organ support interventions, with some being used at rates comparable to those with late or no DNACPR (e.g. non-invasive ventilation 4.4% v 3.5%). On multivariable analysis, older age (p < 0.001), active malignancy (p < 0.001), chronic lung disease (p < 0.001), limited performance status (p < 0.001), and abnormal physiological variables were associated with increased recording of early DNACPR. Asian ethnicity was associated with reduced recording of early DNACPR (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Early DNACPR decisions were associated with recognised predictors of adverse outcome, and were inversely associated with Asian ethnicity. Most people with an early DNACPR decision survived to 30 days and many received potentially life-saving interventions. REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN28342533, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN28342533.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Sutton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Steve Goodacre
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Ben Thomas
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Sarah Connelly
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Field RA, Slowther AM. Treating patients with ReSPECT during a pandemic: Resuscitation decisions during COVID-19. Resuscitation 2021; 164:147-148. [PMID: 34089773 PMCID: PMC8170913 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Field
- University Hospital Coventry, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.
| | - Anne-Marie Slowther
- Warwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|