1
|
Soler-Cataluña JJ, Piñera P, Trigueros JA, Calle M, Casanova C, Cosío BG, López-Campos JL, Molina J, Almagro P, Gómez JT, Riesco JA, Simonet P, Rigau D, Soriano JB, Ancochea J, Miravitlles M. [Translated article] Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) 2021 Update. Diagnosis and Treatment of COPD Exacerbation Syndrome. Arch Bronconeumol 2022; 58:T159-T170. [PMID: 35971815 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2021.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This article details the GesEPOC 2021 recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of COPD exacerbation syndrome (CES). The guidelines propose a definition-based syndromic approach, a new classification of severity, and the recognition of different treatable traits (TT), representing a new step toward personalized medicine. The evidence is evaluated using GRADE methodology, with the incorporation of 6 new PICO questions. The diagnostic process comprises four stages: 1) establish a diagnosis of CES, 2) assess the severity of the episode, 3) identify the trigger, and 4) address TTs. This diagnostic process differentiates an outpatient approach, that recommends the inclusion of a basic battery of tests, from a more comprehensive hospital approach, that includes the study of different biomarkers and imaging tests. Bronchodilator treatment for immediate relief of symptoms is considered essential for all patients, while the use of antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids, oxygen therapy, and assisted ventilation and the treatment of comorbidities will vary depending on severity and possible TTs. The use of antibiotics will be indicated particularly if sputum color changes, when ventilatory assistance is required, in cases involving pneumonia, and in patients with elevated C-reactive protein (≥ 20 mg/L). Systemic corticosteroids are recommended in CES that requires admission and are suggested in moderate CES. These drugs are more effective in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/mm3. Acute-phase non-invasive mechanical ventilation is specified primarily for patients with CES who develop respiratory acidosis despite initial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan José Soler-Cataluña
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova-Lliria, Valencia, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Pascual Piñera
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Myriam Calle
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ciro Casanova
- Servicio de Neumología-Unidad de Investigación Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de La Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Borja G Cosío
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - José Luis López-Campos
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Jesús Molina
- Centro de Salud Francia, Dirección Asistencial Oeste. Madrid, Spain
| | - Pere Almagro
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Juan Antonio Riesco
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain
| | - Pere Simonet
- Centro de Salud Viladecans-2, Dirección Atención Primaria Costa de Ponent-Institut Català de la Salut, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Universitat Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Rigau
- Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan B Soriano
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio Ancochea
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marc Miravitlles
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Soler-Cataluña JJ, Piñera P, Trigueros JA, Calle M, Casanova C, Cosío BG, López-Campos JL, Molina J, Almagro P, Gómez JT, Riesco JA, Simonet P, Rigau D, Soriano JB, Ancochea J, Miravitlles M. Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) 2021 Update Diagnosis and Treatment af COPD Exacerbation Syndrome. Arch Bronconeumol 2021; 58:159-170. [PMID: 34172340 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
This article details the GesEPOC 2021 recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of COPD exacerbation syndrome (CES). The guidelines propose a definition-based syndromic approach, a new classification of severity, and the recognition of different treatable traits (TT), representing a new step toward personalized medicine. The evidence is evaluated using GRADE methodology, with the incorporation of 6 new PICO questions. The diagnostic process comprises four stages: 1) establish a diagnosis of CES, 2) assess the severity of the episode, 3) identify the trigger, and 4) address TTs. This diagnostic process differentiates an outpatient approach, that recommends the inclusion of a basic battery of tests, from a more comprehensive hospital approach, that includes the study of different biomarkers and imaging tests. Bronchodilator treatment for immediate relief of symptoms is considered essential for all patients, while the use of antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids, oxygen therapy, and assisted ventilation and the treatment of comorbidities will vary depending on severity and possible TTs. The use of antibiotics will be indicated particularly if sputum color changes, when ventilatory assistance is required, in cases involving pneumonia, and in patients with elevated C-reactive protein (≥ 20 mg/L). Systemic corticosteroids are recommended in CES that requires admission and are suggested in moderate CES. These drugs are more effective in patients with blood eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/mm3. Acute-phase non-invasive mechanical ventilation is specified primarily for patients with CES who develop respiratory acidosis despite initial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan José Soler-Cataluña
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova-Lliria, Valencia, España; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, España.
| | - Pascual Piñera
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía, Murcia, España
| | | | - Myriam Calle
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, España
| | - Ciro Casanova
- Servicio de Neumología-Unidad de Investigación Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de La Candelaria, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, España
| | - Borja G Cosío
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, España; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, España
| | - José Luis López-Campos
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, España; Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
| | - Jesús Molina
- Centro de Salud Francia, Dirección Asistencial Oeste. Madrid, España
| | - Pere Almagro
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa, Barcelona, España
| | | | - Juan Antonio Riesco
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, España; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, España
| | - Pere Simonet
- Centro de Salud Viladecans-2, Dirección Atención Primaria Costa de Ponent-Institut Català de la Salut, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Universitat Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - David Rigau
- Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, Barcelona, España
| | - Joan B Soriano
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, España; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Julio Ancochea
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, España; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Marc Miravitlles
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, España; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matera MG, Page CP, Calzetta L, Rogliani P, Cazzola M. Pharmacology and Therapeutics of Bronchodilators Revisited. Pharmacol Rev 2020; 72:218-252. [PMID: 31848208 DOI: 10.1124/pr.119.018150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Bronchodilators remain the cornerstone of the treatment of airway disorders such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is therefore considerable interest in understanding how to optimize the use of our existing classes of bronchodilator and in identifying novel classes of bronchodilator drugs. However, new classes of bronchodilator have proved challenging to develop because many of these have no better efficacy than existing classes of bronchodilator and often have unacceptable safety profiles. Recent research has shown that optimization of bronchodilation occurs when both arms of the autonomic nervous system are affected through antagonism of muscarinic receptors to reduce the influence of parasympathetic innervation of the lung and through stimulation of β 2-adrenoceptors (β 2-ARs) on airway smooth muscle with β 2-AR-selective agonists to mimic the sympathetic influence on the lung. This is currently achieved by use of fixed-dose combinations of inhaled long-acting β 2-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists (LAMAs). Due to the distinct mechanisms of action of LAMAs and LABAs, the additive/synergistic effects of using these drug classes together has been extensively investigated. More recently, so-called "triple inhalers" containing fixed-dose combinations of both classes of bronchodilator (dual bronchodilation) and an inhaled corticosteroid in the same inhaler have been developed. Furthermore, a number of so-called "bifunctional drugs" having two different primary pharmacological actions in the same molecule are under development. This review discusses recent advancements in knowledge on bronchodilators and bifunctional drugs for the treatment of asthma and COPD. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Since our last review in 2012, there has been considerable research to identify novel classes of bronchodilator drugs, to further understand how to optimize the use of the existing classes of bronchodilator, and to better understand the role of bifunctional drugs in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M G Matera
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy (M.G.M.); Sackler Institute of Pulmonary Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (C.P.P.); and Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy (L.C., P.R., M.C.)
| | - C P Page
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy (M.G.M.); Sackler Institute of Pulmonary Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (C.P.P.); and Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy (L.C., P.R., M.C.)
| | - L Calzetta
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy (M.G.M.); Sackler Institute of Pulmonary Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (C.P.P.); and Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy (L.C., P.R., M.C.)
| | - P Rogliani
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy (M.G.M.); Sackler Institute of Pulmonary Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (C.P.P.); and Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy (L.C., P.R., M.C.)
| | - M Cazzola
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy (M.G.M.); Sackler Institute of Pulmonary Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (C.P.P.); and Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy (L.C., P.R., M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Petite SE, Murphy JA. Evaluation of Bronchodilator Use During Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation Inpatient Admissions. Hosp Pharm 2019; 54:112-118. [PMID: 30923404 PMCID: PMC6431716 DOI: 10.1177/0018578718769569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: It is unknown whether the timing of initiation of a long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) during a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation or the method of short-acting bronchodilator (SABD) delivery may aid in improving patient outcomes. Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the impact of bronchodilator management in the hospital setting on clinical outcomes in patients with COPD exacerbation. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study evaluated patients admitted to the non-intensive care unit setting with a COPD exacerbation as defined by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. The primary outcome was difference in 30-day readmission rates for early LABD therapy (<24 hours from hospital admission) versus late/no LABD therapy (>24 hours from hospital admission or not during hospitalization). Secondary objectives included length of stay (LOS) for this group, and 30-day readmission rates and LOS for the SABD via inhaler versus nebulizer groups. Results: Two hundred twenty patients were included. There was no difference in 30-day readmission rate (15.2% vs 18.2%, P = .6) and LOS (median 4 [interquartile range, IQR 3-6]) days for both groups, P = .34) between early versus late/no LABD therapy initiation, respectively. No difference was observed in 30-day readmission rate (16.7% vs 16.6%) and LOS (median 2.5 [IQR 1.1-3.9] days vs median 4 [IQR 2-6] days) between inhaler and nebulizer SABD therapy groups. Conclusions: No difference was observed in 30-day readmission rates or LOS when utilizing early LABD compared with late/no LABD therapy or comparing inhaler and nebulizer SABD delivery methods during COPD exacerbation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Beltaief K, Msolli MA, Zorgati A, Sekma A, Fakhfakh M, Marzouk MB, Boubaker H, Grissa MH, Methamem M, Boukef R, Belguith A, Bouida W, Nouira S. Nebulized Terbutaline and Ipratropium Bromide Versus Terbutaline Alone in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Requiring Noninvasive Ventilation: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med 2019; 26:434-442. [PMID: 30156361 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Short-acting β2 -agonists are the mainstay of treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) in the emergency department (ED). It is still unclear whether the addition of short-acting anticholinergics is clinically more effective care compared to treatment with β2 -agonists alone in patients with hypercapnic AECOPD. OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate whether combining ipratropium bromide (IB) to terbutaline reduces hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates compared to terbutaline alone in AECOPD hypercapnic patients. METHODS In this double-blind controlled trial, patients who were admitted to the ED for AECOPD requiring noninvasive ventilation (NIV) were randomized to receive either 5 mg of nebulized terbutaline combined to 0.5 mg of IB (terbutaline/IB group, n = 115) or 5 mg of terbutaline sulfate (terbutaline group, n = 117). Nebulization was repeated every 20 minutes for the first hour and every 4 hours within the first day. Primary outcomes were the rate of hospital admission and need for endotracheal intubation within the first 24 hours of the start of the experimental treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline of dyspnea, physiologic variables, length of hospital stay, ICU admission rate, and 7-day mortality. RESULTS The two groups were similar regarding baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Hospital admission was observed in 70 patients (59.8%) in the terbutaline/IB group and in 75 patients (65.2%) in the terbutaline group (respiratory rate [RR] = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.93 to 1.27, p = 0.39). ICU admission was required in 37 (32.2%) patients in the terbutaline/IB group and 30 patients (25.6%) in terbutaline group (RR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.54, p = 0.27). There were no significant differences in dyspnea score, blood gas parameters changes, vital signs improvement, and 7-day death rate between both groups. CONCLUSION In patients admitted to the ED for AECOPD requiring NIV, combination of nebulized IB and terbutaline did not reduce hospital admission and need to ICU care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaouthar Beltaief
- Emergency Department Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia
- Research Laboratory LR12SP18 University of Monastir Monastir Tunisia
| | - Mohamed Amine Msolli
- Emergency Department Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia
- Research Laboratory LR12SP18 University of Monastir Monastir Tunisia
| | - Asma Zorgati
- Emergency Department Sahloul University Hospital Sousse Tunisia
| | - Adel Sekma
- Emergency Department Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia
- Research Laboratory LR12SP18 University of Monastir Monastir Tunisia
| | - Marwen Fakhfakh
- Emergency Department Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia
- Research Laboratory LR12SP18 University of Monastir Monastir Tunisia
| | - Maryem Ben Marzouk
- Emergency Department Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia
- Research Laboratory LR12SP18 University of Monastir Monastir Tunisia
| | - Hamdi Boubaker
- Emergency Department Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia
- Research Laboratory LR12SP18 University of Monastir Monastir Tunisia
| | - Mohamed Habib Grissa
- Emergency Department Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia
- Research Laboratory LR12SP18 University of Monastir Monastir Tunisia
| | - Mehdi Methamem
- Emergency Department Farhat Hached University Hospital Sousse Tunisia
| | - Riadh Boukef
- Emergency Department Sahloul University Hospital Sousse Tunisia
- Research Laboratory LR12SP18 University of Monastir Monastir Tunisia
| | - Asma Belguith
- Department of Preventive Medicine Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia
| | - Wahid Bouida
- Emergency Department Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia
- Research Laboratory LR12SP18 University of Monastir Monastir Tunisia
| | - Semir Nouira
- Emergency Department Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital Monastir Tunisia
- Research Laboratory LR12SP18 University of Monastir Monastir Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maqsood U, Ho TN, Palmer K, Eccles FJR, Munavvar M, Wang R, Crossingham I, Evans DJW. Once daily long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in a combined inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3:CD012930. [PMID: 30839102 PMCID: PMC6402279 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012930.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory condition causing accumulation of mucus in the airways, cough, and breathlessness; the disease is progressive and is the fourth most common cause of death worldwide. Current treatment strategies for COPD are multi-modal and aim to reduce morbidity and mortality and increase patients' quality of life by slowing disease progression and preventing exacerbations. Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) plus a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) delivered via a single inhaler are approved by regulatory authorities in the USA, Europe, and Japan for the treatment of COPD. Several LABA/LAMA FDCs are available and recent meta-analyses have clarified their utility versus their mono-components in COPD. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of once-daily LABA/LAMA FDCs versus placebo will facilitate the comparison of different FDCs in future network meta-analyses. OBJECTIVES We assessed the evidence for once-daily LABA/LAMA combinations (delivered in a single inhaler) versus placebo on clinically meaningful outcomes in patients with stable COPD. SEARCH METHODS We identified trials from Cochrane Airways' Specialised Register (CASR) and also conducted a search of the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (apps.who.int/trialsearch). We searched CASR and trial registries from their inception to 3 December 2018; we imposed no restriction on language of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA We included parallel-group and cross-over randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing once-daily LABA/LAMA FDC versus placebo. We included studies reported as full-text, those published as abstract only, and unpublished data. We excluded very short-term trials with a duration of less than 3 weeks. We included adults (≥ 40 years old) with a diagnosis of stable COPD. We included studies that allowed participants to continue using their ICS during the trial as long as the ICS was not part of the randomised treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened the search results to determine included studies, extracted data on prespecified outcomes of interest, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; we resolved disagreements by discussion with a third review author. Where possible, we used a random-effects model to meta-analyse extracted data. We rated all outcomes using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system and presented results in 'Summary of findings' tables. MAIN RESULTS We identified and included 22 RCTs randomly assigning 8641 people with COPD to either once-daily LABA/LAMA FDC (6252 participants) or placebo (3819 participants); nine studies had a cross-over design. Studies had a duration of between three and 52 weeks (median 12 weeks). The mean age of participants across the included studies ranged from 59 to 65 years and in 21 of 22 studies, participants had GOLD stage II or III COPD. Concomitant inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use was permitted in all of the included studies (where stated); across the included studies, between 28% to 58% of participants were using ICS at baseline. Six studies evaluated the once-daily combination of IND/GLY (110/50 μg), seven studies evaluated TIO/OLO (2.5/5 or 5/5 μg), eight studies evaluated UMEC/VI (62.5/5, 125/25 or 500/25 μg) and one study evaluated ACD/FOR (200/6, 200/12 or 200/18 μg); all LABA/LAMA combinations were compared with placebo.The risk of bias was generally considered to be low or unknown (insufficient detail provided), with only one study per domain considered to have a high risk of bias except for the domain 'other bias' which was determined to be at high risk of bias in four studies (in three studies, disease severity was greater at baseline in participants receiving LABA/LAMA compared with participants receiving placebo, which would be expected to shift the treatment effect in favour of placebo).Compared to the placebo, the pooled results for the primary outcomes for the once-daily LABA/LAMA arm were as follows: all-cause mortality, OR 1.88 (95% CI 0.81 to 4.36, low-certainty evidence); all-cause serious adverse events (SAEs), OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.28, high-certainty evidence); acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.78, moderate-certainty evidence); adjusted St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, MD -4.08 (95% CI -4.80 to -3.36, high-certainty evidence); proportion of SGRQ responders, OR 1.75 (95% CI 1.54 to 1.99). Compared with placebo, the pooled results for the secondary outcomes for the once-daily LABA/LAMA arm were as follows: adjusted trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), MD 0.20 L (95% CI 0.19 to 0.21, moderate-certainty evidence); adjusted peak FEV1, MD 0.31 L (95% CI 0.29 to 0.32, moderate-certainty evidence); and all-cause AEs, OR 0.95 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.04; high-certainty evidence). No studies reported data for the 6-minute walk test. The results were generally consistent across subgroups for different LABA/LAMA combinations and doses. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Compared with placebo, once-daily LABA/LAMA (either IND/GLY, UMEC/VI or TIO/OLO) via a combination inhaler is associated with a clinically significant improvement in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD; UMEC/VI appears to reduce the rate of exacerbations in this population. These conclusions are supported by moderate or high certainty evidence based on studies with an observation period of up to one year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usman Maqsood
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS TrustDepartment of Respiratory MedicineBirminghamUK
| | - Terence N Ho
- St. Joseph's HealthcareFirestone Institute for Respiratory HealthHamiltonOntarioCanada
- McMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | - Karen Palmer
- Lancashire Care NHS Foundation TrustNIHR Lancashire CRFPrestonUK
| | | | - Mohammed Munavvar
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Respiratory MedicinePrestonUK
| | - Ran Wang
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Respiratory MedicinePrestonUK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rhee CK, Yoshisue H, Lad R. Fixed-Dose Combinations of Long-Acting Bronchodilators for the Management of COPD: Global and Asian Perspectives. Adv Ther 2019; 36:495-519. [PMID: 30742242 PMCID: PMC6824447 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-0893-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Maintenance bronchodilator therapy with long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) is the cornerstone treatment for patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of LABA/LAMA are recommended for the majority of symptomatic COPD patients by global guidelines; regional guidelines such as the Japanese and Korean guidelines also provide similar recommendations for the use of LABA/LAMA FDCs. This review comprehensively describes the latest clinical evidence from key studies on the efficacy and safety of four approved LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations: indacaterol/glycopyrronium, vilanterol/umeclidinium, formoterol/aclidinium, and olodaterol/tiotropium. Additionally, in this review we describe the rationale behind the use of LABA/LAMA FDC therapy, key findings from the preclinical and clinical trial evaluation of respective LABA and LAMA monocomponents, and the efficacy and safety of LABA/LAMA FDCs. Special emphasis is placed on the clinical evidence for the monocomponents and LABA/LAMA FDCs from the Asian population. This detailed overview of the efficacy and safety of LABA/LAMA FDCs in global and Asian COPD patients is envisaged to provide a better understanding of the benefits of these therapies and to inform healthcare providers and patients on their appropriate use.Funding: Novartis Pharma K.K.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin Kook Rhee
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Rahul Lad
- Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mantero M, Radovanovic D, Santus P, Blasi F. Management of severe COPD exacerbations: focus on beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol/glycopyrronium bromide. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2018; 13:2319-2333. [PMID: 30104872 PMCID: PMC6072677 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s147484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The major determinant of the decline in lung function, quality of life, and the increased mortality risk in patients with COPD is represented by severe acute exacerbations of the disease, that is, those requiring patients’ hospitalization, constituting a substantial social and health care burden in terms of morbidity and medical resource utilization. Different long-term therapeutic strategies have been proposed so far in order to prevent and/or reduce the clinical and social impact of these events, the majority of which were extrapolated from trials initially focused on the effect of long-acting muscarinic antagonist and subsequently on the efficacy of long-acting β2-agonists in combination or not with inhaled corticosteroids. The option to employ all three classes of molecules combined, despite the limited amount of evidence in our possession, represents a choice currently proposed by international guidelines; however, current recommendations are often based mainly on observational studies or on the results of secondary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. The present narrative review evaluates the available trials that investigated the efficacy of inhaled therapy to prevent COPD exacerbations and especially severe ones, with a particular focus on beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol/glycopyrronium bromide fixed dose combination, which is the first treatment that comprises all the three drug classes, specifically tested for the prevention of moderate and severe COPD exacerbations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Mantero
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, .,Internal Medicine Department, Respiratory Unit and Regional Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Policlinico, Milan, Italy,
| | - Dejan Radovanovic
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Pulmonary Unit, University of Milan, Ospedale L. Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierachille Santus
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Pulmonary Unit, University of Milan, Ospedale L. Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Blasi
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, .,Internal Medicine Department, Respiratory Unit and Regional Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Policlinico, Milan, Italy,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Marsh B, Drake MG. Outpatient Management for Acute Exacerbations of Obstructive Lung Diseases. Med Clin North Am 2017; 101:537-551. [PMID: 28372712 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Primary care providers tasked with treating acute exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease must be able to recognize exacerbation of symptoms and triage patients based on exacerbation severity to the appropriate level of care. Early treatment with bronchodilators and corticosteroids should be followed by repeated assessments of treatment efficacy. Primary care providers should also provide symptom-guided action plans to empower patients to manage their disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda Marsh
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Matthew G Drake
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Radovanovic D, Mantero M, Sferrazza Papa GF, Valenti V, Aliberti S, Di Marco F, Santus P. Formoterol fumarate + glycopyrrolate for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Rev Respir Med 2016; 10:1045-55. [PMID: 27552524 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2016.1227247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by a high disability and increasing mortality. Bronchodilators are the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment in COPD, while therapeutic optimization with an improvement in symptoms and compliance represent the actual goals. This has led to the development of devices that combine different classes of inhalatory drugs. Recently, a novel combination of the long acting antimuscarinic agent glycopyrronium bromide and the beta2-agonist formoterol fumarate has been developed in a metered dose inhaler delivery system. AREAS COVERED The present article will discuss the current unmet needs in pharmacological therapy of COPD, will then briefly cover the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the formoterol/glycopyrronium fixed dose combination and present the novel delivery system based on engineered microparticles and the co-suspension technology. Finally, efficacy and safety results of phase I, II and III trials will be reviewed. Expert commentary: The novel combination therapy of formoterol/glycopyrronium is the first available as a metered dose inhaler and proved to have a good efficacy and safety profile compared to monocomponents and tiotropium. Although still limited, data from phase III trials provide good evidence to consider it a valid option in the pharmacological management of patients with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dejan Radovanovic
- a Health Sciences Department, Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Scientific Institute of Milan-IRCCS , Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan , Italy
| | - Marco Mantero
- b Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation , Università degli Studi di Milano, Cardio-thoracic Unit and Cystic Fibrosis Adult Center Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano , Milan , Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Valenti
- d San Donato Milanese , Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan , Italy
| | - Stefano Aliberti
- b Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation , Università degli Studi di Milano, Cardio-thoracic Unit and Cystic Fibrosis Adult Center Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano , Milan , Italy
| | - Fabiano Di Marco
- c Health Sciences Department, Respiratory Unit, San Paolo and Carlo Hospital , Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan , Italy
| | - Pierachille Santus
- a Health Sciences Department, Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Scientific Institute of Milan-IRCCS , Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Inhaled bronchodilators are the mainstay of COPD pharmacological treatment. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are a major class of inhaled bronchodilators. Some LAMA/device systems with different characteristics and dosing schedules are currently approved for maintenance therapy of COPD and a range of other products are being developed. They improve lung function and patient-reported outcomes and reduce acute bronchial exacerbations with good safety. LAMAs are used either alone or associated with long-acting β₂-agonists, eventually in fixed dose combinations. Long-acting β₂-agonist/LAMA combinations assure additional benefits over the individual components alone. The reader will obtain a view of the safety and efficacy of the different LAMA/device systems in COPD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea S Melani
- Dipartimento Vasi, Cuore e Torace, Fisiopatologia e Riabilitazione Respiratoria, Policlinico Le Scotte, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Viale Bracci Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Laudisio A, Costanzo L, Di Gioia C, Delussu AS, Traballesi M, Gemma A, Antonelli Incalzi R. Dietary intake of elderly outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2016; 64:75-81. [PMID: 26952380 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2015] [Revised: 12/30/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often associated with malnutrition, which is in turn associated with poor outcomes. Accordingly, in COPD patients adequate nutrition might improve several clinical and functional outcomes. Nevertheless, information about nutrient intake of older populations with COPD is still scanty. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analysed data of 523 elderly attending a geriatric ambulatory. Of these, 165 had a diagnosis of COPD, while 358 were control participants, matched for demographic characteristics and free from respiratory diseases. COPD was diagnosed according to the global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) criteria. The intake of micro and macronutrients was recorded using the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC) questionnaire. Nutrient intake of COPD patients was compared with that of the control group and with recommended dietary allowances RDA. RESULTS COPD patients had a lower energy intake, as compared with control participants (29.4 vs 34.4 kcal/kg of ideal weight; P<.0001), due to reduced intake of carbohydrates and proteins. Accordingly, in the energy intake was lower than recommended in 52% of COPD patients, vs 30% of controls (P<.0001). The intake of calcium, potassium, folate, cholecalciferol, retinol, and thiamine was lower than RDA in over 75% of COPD patients. CONCLUSIONS The diet of elderly COPD outpatients does not provide the recommended energy intake, nor does it meet the RDA for many micronutrients. Such deficits are more severe than in age matched non- respiratory subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Laudisio
- Department of Geriatrics, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy.
| | - Luisa Costanzo
- Department of Geriatrics, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Di Gioia
- Department of Geriatrics, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 200-00128 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonella Gemma
- UOS Accesso e Presa in Carico Assistenziale, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma E, Borgo S. Spirito, 3 Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lindenauer PK, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Stefan MS. Use and outcomes associated with long-acting bronchodilators among patients hospitalized for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11:1186-94. [PMID: 25167078 PMCID: PMC4299001 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201407-311oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2014] [Accepted: 08/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Long-acting β-adrenergic agonists and long-acting anticholinergic agents are recommended for the management of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, their role in the acute setting is uncertain. OBJECTIVES To describe the use and outcomes associated with long-acting bronchodilator therapy (LABD) among patients hospitalized with exacerbations of COPD. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study at 421 U.S. hospitals of patients hospitalized with exacerbations of COPD between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2011. We used propensity score methods to compare the risk of a composite measure of treatment failure, length of stay, and hospital costs in patients who were treated with an LABD to those who did not receive treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of the 77,378 patients included in the analysis, 31,725 (41%) were treated with an LABD on Hospital Day 1 or Day 2, including 15,356 (48.4%) who received a long-acting β-agonist, 6,665 (21%) who received a long-acting anticholinergic, and 9,704 (30.6%) who received both. When compared with patients who were not treated with an LABD, treated patients tended to be younger and had a modestly lower comorbidity burden but were more likely to have had prior admission for COPD and to be treated with inhaled corticosteroids. The incidence of treatment failure was similar among those who were or were not treated with LABDs (13.1 vs. 13.6%, P = 0.06). In propensity-matched analyses we found no difference in the risk of treatment failure associated with exposure to LABDs (relative risk [RR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.04), minimal differences in hospital cost (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), and no difference in length of stay (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02). CONCLUSIONS Despite a lack of evidence, LABDs are commonly prescribed to patients hospitalized for exacerbations of COPD but are not associated with better clinical or economic outcomes. Clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal use of these medications in the acute care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter K. Lindenauer
- Center for Quality of Care Research, and
- Division of General Medicine and Community Health, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | | | - Penelope S. Pekow
- Center for Quality of Care Research, and
- University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Amherst, Massachusetts
| | - Mihaela S. Stefan
- Center for Quality of Care Research, and
- Division of General Medicine and Community Health, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bronchodilator efficacy of tiotropium–formoterol via single pressurized meter dose inhaler (pMDI) versus tiotropium alone in COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2014; 27:90-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2013.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2013] [Revised: 05/14/2013] [Accepted: 05/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
16
|
|
17
|
Tashkin DP, Ferguson GT. Combination bronchodilator therapy in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res 2013; 14:49. [PMID: 23651244 PMCID: PMC3651866 DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2013] [Accepted: 04/24/2013] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents a significant cause of global morbidity and mortality, with a substantial economic impact. Recent changes in the Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidance refined the classification of patients for treatment using a combination of spirometry, assessment of symptoms, and/or frequency of exacerbations. The aim of treatment remains to reduce existing symptoms while decreasing the risk of future adverse health events. Long-acting bronchodilators are the mainstay of therapy due to their proven efficacy. GOLD guidelines recommend combining long-acting bronchodilators with differing mechanisms of action if the control of COPD is insufficient with monotherapy, and recent years have seen growing interest in the additional benefits that combination of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), typified by tiotropium, with long-acting β(2)-agonists (LABAs), such as formoterol and salmeterol. Most studies have examined free combinations of currently available LAMAs and LABAs, broadly showing a benefit in terms of lung function and other patient-reported outcomes, although evidence is limited at present. Several once- or twice-daily fixed-dose LAMA/LABA combinations are under development, most involving newly developed monotherapy components. This review outlines the existing data for LAMA/LABA combinations in the treatment of COPD, summarizes the ongoing trials, and considers the evidence required to inform the role of LAMA/LABA combinations in treatment of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald P Tashkin
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Gary T Ferguson
- Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, 28815 Eight Mile Road, Suite 103, Livonia, MI, 48152, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Serrano-Mollar A. [Alveolar epithelial cell injury as an etiopathogenic factor in pulmonary fibrosis]. Arch Bronconeumol 2012; 48 Suppl 2:2-6. [PMID: 23116901 PMCID: PMC7131261 DOI: 10.1016/s0300-2896(12)70044-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by a progressive accumulation of extracellular matrix and an imbalance between profibrotic and antifibrotic mediators. In the last few years, understanding of the mechanisms of the biology of IPF has increased. One of the most significant discoveries is the finding that alveolar epithelial cell injury plays an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. In this review, we describe some of the mechanisms involved in alveolar cell injury and their contribution to the development of IPF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Serrano-Mollar
- Departamento de Patología Experimental, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona, España.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chong J, Karner C, Poole P. Tiotropium versus long-acting beta-agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2012:CD009157. [PMID: 22972134 PMCID: PMC8935978 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009157.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tiotropium and long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABAs) are both accepted in the routine management for people with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There are new studies which have compared tiotropium with LABAs, including some that have evaluated recently introduced LABAs. OBJECTIVES To compare the relative clinical effects of tiotropium bromide alone versus LABA alone, upon measures of quality of life, exacerbations, lung function and serious adverse events, in people with stable COPD.To critically appraise and summarise current evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness associated with tiotropium compared to LABA in people with COPD. SEARCH METHODS We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials and economic evaluations from searching NHS EED and HEED (date of last search February 2012). We found additional trials from web-based clinical trial registers. SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs and full economic evaluations if they compared effects of tiotropium alone with LABAs alone in people with COPD. We allowed co-administration of standard COPD therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, then extracted data on study quality and outcomes. We contacted study authors and trial sponsors for additional information. We analysed data using the Cochrane Review Manager(RevMan 5.1) software. MAIN RESULTS Seven clinical studies totalling 12,223 participants with COPD were included in the review. The studies used similar designs and were generally of good methodological quality. Inclusion criteria for RCTs were similar across the included studies, although studies varied in terms of smoking history and COPD severity of participants. They compared tiotropium (which was delivered by HandiHaler in all studies) with salmeterol (four studies, 8936 participants), formoterol (one study, 431 participants) and indacaterol (two studies, 2856 participants). All participants were instructed to discontinue anticholinergic or long-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilators during treatment, but could receive inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at a stable dose. Study duration ranged from 3 to 12 months. We extracted data for 11,223 participants. In general, the treatment groups were well matched at baseline. Overall, the risk of bias across the included RCTs was low.In the analysis of the primary outcomes in this review, a high level of heterogeneity amongst studies meant that we did not pool data for St George's Respiratory Questionnaire quality of life score. Subgroup analyses based on the type of LABA found statistically significant differences among effects on quality of life depending on whether tiotropium was compared with salmeterol, formoterol or indacaterol. Tiotropium reduced the number of participants experiencing one or more exacerbations compared with LABA (odds ratio (OR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 0.93). For this outcome, there was no difference seen among the different types of LABA. There was no statistical difference in mortality observed between the treatment groups.For secondary outcomes, tiotropium was associated with a reduction in the number of COPD exacerbations leading to hospitalisation compared with LABA treatment (OR 0.87; 95% 0.77 to 0.99), but not in the overall rate of all-cause hospitalisations. There was no statistically significant difference in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) or symptom score between tiotropium and LABA-treated participants. There was a lower rate of non-fatal serious adverse events recorded with tiotropium compared with LABA (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99). The tiotropium group was also associated with a lower rate of study withdrawals (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).We identified six full economic evaluations assessing the cost and cost-effectiveness of tiotropium and salmeterol. The studies were based on an economic model or empirical analysis of clinical data from RCTs. They all looked at maintenance costs and the costs for COPD exacerbations, including respiratory medications and hospitalisations. The setting for the evaluations was primary and secondary care in the UK, Greece, Netherlands, Spain and USA. All the studies estimated tiotropium to be superior to salmeterol based on better clinical outcomes (exacerbations or quality of life) and/or lower total costs. However, the authors of all evaluations reported there was substantial uncertainty around the results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In people with COPD, the evidence is equivocal as to whether or not tiotropium offers greater benefit than LABAs in improving quality of life; however, this is complicated by differences in effect among the LABA types. Tiotropium was more effective than LABAs as a group in preventing COPD exacerbations and disease-related hospitalisations, although there were no statistical differences between groups in overall hospitalisation rates or mortality during the study periods. There were fewer serious adverse events and study withdrawals recorded with tiotropium compared with LABAs. Symptom improvement and changes in lung function were similar between the treatment groups. Given the small number of studies to date, with high levels of heterogeneity among them, one approach may be to give a COPD patient a substantial trial of tiotropium, followed by a LABA (or vice versa), then to continue prescribing the long-acting bronchodilator that the patient prefers. Further studies are needed to compare tiotropium with different LABAs, which are currently ongoing. The available economic evidence indicates that tiotropium may be cost-effective compared with salmeterol in several specific settings, but there is considerable uncertainty around this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimmy Chong
- University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dhand R, Dolovich M, Chipps B, R. Myers T, Restrepo R, Rosen Farrar J. The Role of Nebulized Therapy in the Management of COPD: Evidence and Recommendations. COPD 2012; 9:58-72. [DOI: 10.3109/15412555.2011.630047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
21
|
Bogdan MA, Aizawa H, Fukuchi Y, Mishima M, Nishimura M, Ichinose M. Efficacy and safety of inhaled formoterol 4.5 and 9 μg twice daily in Japanese and European COPD patients: phase III study results. BMC Pulm Med 2011; 11:51. [PMID: 22085439 PMCID: PMC3233513 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-11-51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2011] [Accepted: 11/15/2011] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the long-acting β₂-agonist formoterol in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. METHODS This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational phase III study randomized patients ≥ 40 years of age with moderate-to-severe COPD to inhaled formoterol 4.5 or 9 μg twice daily (bid) via Turbuhaler or placebo for 12 weeks. Salbutamol 100 μg/actuation via pMDI was permitted as reliever medication. The primary outcome variable was change (ratio) from baseline to treatment period in FEV1 60-min post-dose. RESULTS 613 patients received treatment (formoterol 4.5 μg n = 206; 9 μg n = 199; placebo n = 208); 539 (87.9%) male; 324 (52.9%) Japanese and 289 (47.1%) European. End of study increases in FEV1 60-min post-dose were significantly greater (p < 0.001 for both) with formoterol 4.5 and 9 μg bid (113% of baseline for both) than with placebo, as were all secondary outcome measures. The proportion of patients with an improvement in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score of ≥ 4 was 50.2% for formoterol 4.5 μg (p = 0.0682 vs. placebo), 59.2% (p = 0.0004) for 9 μg, and 41.3% for placebo. Reduction in reliever medication use was significantly greater with formoterol vs. placebo (9 μg: -0.548, p < 0.001; 4.5 μg: -0.274, p = 0.027), with 9 μg being significantly superior to 4.5 μg (-0.274, p = 0.029). Formoterol was well tolerated with the incidence and type of adverse events not being different for the three groups. CONCLUSIONS Formoterol 4.5 μg and 9 μg bid was effective and well tolerated in patients with COPD; there was no difference between formoterol doses for the primary endpoint; however, an added value of formoterol 9 μg over 4.5 μg bid was observed for some secondary endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT00628862 (ClinicalTrials.gov); D5122C00001 (AstraZeneca Study code).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miron A Bogdan
- Clinica Medic Or, Calea Vitan no 106, Postcode 031298, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Hisamichi Aizawa
- Kurume University, 67 Asahi-cho, Kurume-shi, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan
| | | | - Michiaki Mishima
- Kyoto University, Yoshidakonoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Masaharu Nishimura
- Hokkaido University, Nishi 7-chome, Kita 15-jo, Kita-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 060-8638, Japan
| | - Masakazu Ichinose
- Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama-shi, Wakayama 641-8509, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhang WH, Zhang Y, Cui YY, Rong WF, Cambier C, Devillier P, Bureau F, Advenier C, Gustin P. Can β2-adrenoceptor agonists, anticholinergic drugs, and theophylline contribute to the control of pulmonary inflammation and emphysema in COPD? Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2011; 26:118-34. [PMID: 22044554 DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2011.01007.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has become a global epidemic disease with an increased morbidity and mortality in the world. Inflammatory process progresses and contributes to irreversible airflow limitation. However, there is no available therapy to better control the inflammatory progression and therefore to reduce the exacerbations and mortality. Thus, the development of efficient anti-inflammatory therapies is a priority for patients with COPD. β(2) -Adrenoceptor agonists and anticholinergic agents are widely used as first line drugs in management of COPD because of their efficient bronchodilator properties. At present, many studies in vitro and some data obtained in laboratory animals reveal the potential anti-inflammatory effects of these bronchodilators but their protective role against chronic inflammation and the development of emphysema in patients with COPD remains to be investigated. The anti-inflammatory effects of theophylline at low doses have also been identified. Beneficial interactions between glucocorticoids and bronchodilators have been reported, and signaling pathways explaining these synergistic effects begin to be understood, especially for theophylline. Recent data demonstrating interactions between anticholinergics with β(2) -adrenoceptor agonists aiming to better control the pulmonary inflammation and the development of emphysema in animal models of COPD justify the priority to investigate the interactive effects of a tritherapy associating corticoids with the two main categories of bronchodilators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Hui Zhang
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tashkin DP, Varghese ST. Combined treatment with formoterol and tiotropium is more efficacious than treatment with tiotropium alone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, regardless of smoking status, inhaled corticosteroid use, baseline severity, or gender. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2010; 24:147-52. [PMID: 20659577 DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2010.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2010] [Revised: 06/24/2010] [Accepted: 07/16/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
A recent randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, multicenter study of 255 patients ≥ 40 years of age with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) showed that combined formoterol (FOR) and tiotropium (TIO) treatment in patients with COPD significantly improved lung function as well as symptoms and other patient-reported outcomes compared with TIO alone. FOR and TIO are long-acting bronchodilators that represent the β₂-adrenergic agonist and anticholinergic classes, respectively. However, the possible influence of smoking status, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use, baseline disease severity, and gender differences on bronchodilator efficacy requires further investigation. Using data from the previously published study mentioned above, a post hoc analysis was performed to examine the efficacy of combined FOR + TIO treatment compared with TIO monotherapy in subgroup analyses of men and women, current and ex-smokers, ICS users and non-ICS users, and patients with moderate and severe/very severe COPD. Efficacy comparisons were based on the changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s measured 0-4 h after the morning dose (FEV₁ AUC₀₋₄h). After a run-in period, patients were treated for 12 weeks with either FOR 12 μg twice daily (BID) plus TIO 18 μg once daily (QD) in the morning (AM, n = 124) or with FOR placebo BID plus TIO 18 μg QD AM (n = 131). The least squares mean change from baseline in the normalized FEV₁ AUC₀₋₄h was assessed using analysis of covariance. With the exception of treatment differences at week 4 in smokers and subjects with "very severe" COPD, and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 for ICS users and non-ICS users (p values not determined), FOR + TIO was significantly superior (P < 0.05) to TIO alone at all time points (weeks 4, 8, 12, and endpoint), regardless of gender, smoking status, ICS use, or COPD severity. We conclude that coadministered FOR + TIO significantly improves lung function compared with TIO treatment alone in COPD patients regardless of differences in patient subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald P Tashkin
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 37-131 Center for Health Sciences, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tashkin DP. Preventing and managing exacerbations in COPD--critical appraisal of the role of tiotropium. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2010; 5:41-53. [PMID: 20368910 PMCID: PMC2846152 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s9443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2010] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The course of COPD is punctuated by acute exacerbations that are associated with an increase in the morbidity and mortality related to this chronic disease and may contribute to its rate of progression. Therefore, preventing and treating exacerbations are major goals of COPD management. The role of tiotropium in the prevention of exacerbations has been investigated in several placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials varying in duration from 3 months to 4 years in patients with moderate to very severe COPD. In all of these trials, tiotropium has uniformly reduced the proportion of patients experiencing at least one exacerbation and delayed the time to the first exacerbation compared with placebo. In the longer trials (> or =6 months' duration) tiotropium has also reduced the exposure-adjusted incidence rate of exacerbations. In trials of at least 1 year in duration, tiotropium either significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for an exacerbation and/or the proportion of patients with an exacerbation-related hospitalization. In a meta-analysis that included 15 trials of tiotropium vs either placebo (n = 13) and/or a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA; n = 4), tiotropium significantly reduced the odds of experiencing an exacerbation compared to placebo as well as a LABA. The potential additive benefits of tiotropium to those of a LABA and/or inhaled corticosteroid in reducing exacerbations require further investigation. The mechanism whereby tiotropium reduces exacerbations is not due to an anti-inflammatory effect but more likely relates to its property of causing a sustained increase in airway patency and reduction in hyperinflation, thereby counteracting the tendency for respiratory insults to worsen airflow obstruction and hyperinflation. For the management of acute exacerbations, an increase in short-acting inhaled bronchodilators is recommended as needed, while the potential role of long-acting bronchodilators, such as tiotropium, in conjunction with short-acting agents, is unclear and warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald P Tashkin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1690, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tashkin DP, Hanania NA, McGinty J, Denis-Mize K, Chaudry I. Nebulized formoterol provides added benefits to tiotropium treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Adv Ther 2009; 26:1024-34. [PMID: 19953349 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-009-0080-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2009] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of one or more long-acting bronchodilators is key in the maintenance therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This analysis pooled the results of two double-blind studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of adding nebulized formoterol fumarate inhalation solution (FFIS) to maintenance tiotropium (TIO) treatment. METHODS Following a run-in period of 7-14 days with once-daily TIO 18 microg, COPD subjects (> or =25% to <65% predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)]) were randomized to twice-daily FFIS 20 microg (n=145) or nebulized placebo (PLA, n=140) while continuing on maintenance TIO for 6 weeks. Efficacy was measured using serial spirometry, transition dyspnea index (TDI), rescue albuterol use, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS The mean standardized area under the curve for FEV(1) over 3 hours (FEV(1)AUC(0-3)), the primary efficacy variable, was significantly higher in the FFIS/TIO group than the PLA/TIO group on day 1 (140 mL difference, P<0.0001) and week 6 (192 mL difference, P<0.0001). Mean TDI scores in the FFIS/TIO and PLA/TIO groups were 1.97 and 0.67, respectively (P=0.0001). Mean albuterol use declined in the FFIS/TIO group from 2.6 to 1.5 puffs/day compared with little change in the PLA/TIO group (P<0.0001). SGRQ scores were similar between treatment groups with the exception of the symptoms score, which improved in the FFIS/TIO group (-5.8) compared with PLA/TIO (-1.0), and more FFIS/TIO-treated subjects experienced a clinically significant improvement in total SGRQ score. More PLA/TIO-treated subjects than FFIS/TIO-treated subjects experienced adverse events (AEs) (45.7% vs. 31.0%) and COPD exacerbations (7.9% vs. 3.4%). CONCLUSIONS The addition of FFIS to maintenance TIO treatment for moderate to severe COPD results in significantly improved FEV(1) and dyspnea, decreased rescue medication use, and a lower incidence of AEs and COPD exacerbations. The addition of FFIS to TIO yields clinically and statistically significant benefits for COPD patients and might be of long-term benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald P Tashkin
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cazzola M, Tashkin DP. Combination of Formoterol and Tiotropium in the Treatment of COPD: Effects on Lung Function. COPD 2009; 6:404-15. [DOI: 10.1080/15412550903156333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
27
|
Ray NC, Alcaraz L. Muscarinic antagonist-beta-adrenergic agonist dual pharmacology molecules as bronchodilators: a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat 2009; 19:1-12. [PMID: 19441894 DOI: 10.1517/13543770802630331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The proven efficacy of several anti-cholinergics and beta(2)-agonists and their combinations in both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma strongly validates this therapeutic approach. As a consequence and although technically challenging, over the past 4 years there has been a growing interest in the generation of dual pharmacology Muscarinic-receptor antagonists-beta(2)-adrenergic receptor agonists (MABAs) for the treatment of COPD. OBJECTIVE/METHODS This article surveys and reviews the research activity in the MABA area to the end of August 2008. RESULTS/CONCLUSION Although the activity in this field seems to still be limited to a few companies, significant progress in the discovery of a MABA has been achieved with the progression of at least one candidate (GSK-961081) to the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas C Ray
- Argenta Discovery Ltd, 8-9 Spire Green Centre, Flex Meadow, Essex CM19 5TR, Harlow, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Santus P, Di Marco F. Safety and pharmacological profile of tiotropium bromide. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2009; 8:387-95. [DOI: 10.1517/14740330902953684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
29
|
Tashkin DP, Pearle J, Iezzoni D, Varghese ST. Formoterol and tiotropium compared with tiotropium alone for treatment of COPD. COPD 2009; 6:17-25. [PMID: 19229704 DOI: 10.1080/15412550902724073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Combined use of beta(2)-agonists and anticholinergic bronchodilators may have complementary benefits in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The objective of this study was to compare combination treatment with formoterol (FORM) plus tiotropium (TIO) versus treatment with TIO alone in patients with COPD. In this active-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial, a total of 255 subjects with diagnosed COPD were randomized to 12 weeks of either a combination of FORM 12 microg twice-daily plus TIO 18 microg once-daily in the morning (QD AM) or monotherapy with TIO 18 microg QD AM. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve for forced expiratory volume in 1 second measured 0 to 4 hours after AM dosing (FEV(1) AUC(0-4h)). Significantly greater improvements in the FEV(1) AUC(0-4h) were seen with FORM + TIO (n = 116) versus TIO (n = 124) at all time points. The increase in FEV(1) 5 minutes after the first dose was 180 mL with FORM + TIO versus 40 mL with TIO (p < 0.001). At endpoint, FEV(1) AUC(0-4h) increased 340 mL with FORM + TIO versus 170 mL with TIO (p < 0.001). Improvements in trough FEV(1) with FORM + TIO versus TIO were 180 mL and 100 mL, respectively (p < 0.01). Significantly greater reductions from baseline in symptom scores (p < 0.05) and daytime albuterol use (p < 0.04) were seen at endpoint with combination FORM + TIO versus TIO monotherapy. Both treatments were well tolerated. This study demonstrated that concurrent treatment with FORM + TIO results in greater therapeutic benefits than TIO alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald P Tashkin
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California-Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tashkin DP, Donohue JF, Mahler DA, Huang H, Goodwin E, Schaefer K, Hanrahan JP, Andrews WT. Effects of arformoterol twice daily, tiotropium once daily, and their combination in patients with COPD. Respir Med 2009; 103:516-24. [PMID: 19208459 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2008] [Revised: 12/17/2008] [Accepted: 12/19/2008] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current guidelines support using in combination more than one class of long-acting bronchodilator for COPD patients whose symptoms are not controlled by mono-therapy. This 2-week, multi-center (34 sites), randomized, modified-blind, parallel group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of concomitant treatment with nebulized arformoterol (the formoterol(R,R)-isomer) BID and tiotropium DPI QD. METHODS COPD patients (mean FEV(1) 1.37L, 45.4% predicted) were randomized to receive mono-therapy (either arformoterol 15microg BID [n=76] or tiotropium 18microg QD [n=80]), or combined therapy (sequential dosing of arformoterol 15microg BID and tiotropium 18microg QD [n=78]). Changes in pulmonary function, dyspnea, and rescue levalbuterol use were evaluated, as were safety outcomes. RESULTS Mean FEV(1)AUC(0-24) (the primary endpoint) improved similarly from baseline for arformoterol (0.10L) and tiotropium (0.08L) treatment groups and greater for the combined therapy group (0.22L; all p-values <0.005). Peak FEV(1), peak FVC, 24-h trough FEV(1), and inspiratory capacity also improved similarly for the mono-therapies and greatest for the combined therapy. Dyspnea (mean transition dyspnea index) improved similarly for arformoterol (+2.3) and tiotropium (+1.8) and greatest with combined therapy (+3.1; p-values <0.05). Levalbuterol use decreased for all treatment groups (range -1.8 to -2.5 actuations/day). All treatments had similar frequency of adverse events. CONCLUSION In this study, the combination of nebulized arformoterol 15microg BID plus tiotropium 18microg DPI QD was the most effective in improving pulmonary function and disease symptoms. Mono-therapy improvement with arformoterol or tiotropium was similar. All three treatments were well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D P Tashkin
- David Geffen School of Medicine UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1690, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sohn JY, Kim SR, Park SJ, Lee HB, Lee YC, Rhee YK. Comparison for the Effects of Triple Therapy with Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate and Tiotropium Bromide versus Individual Components in Patients of Severe COPD Combined with Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2009. [DOI: 10.4046/trd.2009.67.6.536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Youn Sohn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - So Ri Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
- Research Center for Pulmonary Disorders, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Seoung Ju Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
- Research Center for Pulmonary Disorders, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Heung Bum Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Yong Chul Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
- Research Center for Pulmonary Disorders, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Yang Keun Rhee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Akapo S, Gupta J, Martinez E, McCrea C, Ye L, Roach M. Compatibility and aerosol characteristics of formoterol fumarate mixed with other nebulizing solutions. Ann Pharmacother 2008; 42:1416-24. [PMID: 18780805 DOI: 10.1345/aph.1l273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often given admixtures of nebulizable drugs to minimize the time of administration in treatment regimens. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the physicochemical compatibility and aerodynamic characteristics of formoterol fumarate 20 microg/2 mL when mixed or sequentially nebulized with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 mg/2 mL, ipratropium bromide 0.5 mg/2.5 mL, cromolyn sodium 20 mg/2 mL, or acetylcysteine 10% (100 mg/mL). METHODS The admixtures were prepared in triplicate and analyzed for physicochemical compatibility at 0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after mixing at room temperature. Physical compatibility was determined by visual examination and measurements of pH, osmolality, and turbidity. Chemical stability was evaluated using compendial or in-house-validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay methods. The aerodynamic characteristics of the admixtures or sequentially nebulized drugs were determined from aerosols generated from a Pari LC Plus nebulizer, using an 8-stage cascade impactor followed by HPLC analysis of the deposited drug. RESULTS The admixtures remained clear, colorless solutions with no precipitation, except for cloudiness observed in the formoterol/budesonide combination due to budesonide suspension. The pH, osmolality, and turbidity for all admixtures were within the initial values (< or = 3%), and there were no significant changes (< or = 2%) in potency of the active components throughout the 1-hour study period. Due to increased drug volume or reconcentration in the nebulizer cup, the respirable fraction/delivered dose increased significantly (p < 0.05) for the mixed or sequentially nebulized drug. However, the fine particle fraction (FPF), mass median aerodynamic diameter, and geometric standard deviation generally remained unchanged for all admixtures, with the exception of FPF for the formoterol/budesonide combination. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that admixtures of formoterol with budesonide, ipratropium, cromolyn, or acetylcysteine are physically and chemically compatible. However, admixing or sequential nebulization significantly increased the amount of drug delivered compared with single drug nebulization. The clinical implications of the in vitro data in patients with COPD have not been determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Akapo
- Analytical Development, Dey L.P., 2751 Napa Valley Corporate Dr., Napa, CA 94558, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vogelmeier C, Kardos P, Harari S, Gans SJM, Stenglein S, Thirlwell J. Formoterol mono- and combination therapy with tiotropium in patients with COPD: a 6-month study. Respir Med 2008; 102:1511-20. [PMID: 18804362 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2008] [Revised: 07/21/2008] [Accepted: 07/22/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Although guidelines recommend combining long-acting bronchodilators in COPD, data are limited. We examined the clinical efficacy and safety of formoterol, tiotropium and the combination in patients with COPD. Eight hundred and forty-seven patients with COPD (mean FEV(1) 52% predicted; FEV(1)/FVC 53%) were randomized to receive one of the following four treatments for 24 weeks: formoterol 10 microg b.i.d. plus tiotropium 18 microg o.d.; formoterol 10 microg b.i.d.; tiotropium 18 microg o.d., or placebo. The study was partially blinded (formoterol and placebo). For the primary endpoint, FEV(1) 2h post-dose after 24 weeks, there were small differences in favour of the combination therapy versus formoterol (0.07 L, p=0.044) or tiotropium (0.06 L, p=0.066). All three treatments were superior to placebo (p<0.001). The combination was statistically superior to monotherapy for: the primary endpoint (p=0.044 vs. formoterol); FEV(1) 5 min after the first dose (p<0.001) and at 12 weeks (p<0.05 vs. tiotropium); and peak expiratory flow averaged over the first 6 weeks (p<0.001 vs. both). The three active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo for secondary endpoints: COPD-related 'bad days', symptoms, use of rescue medication and peak expiratory flow, and aspects of health-related quality of life. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar with all active treatments, although COPD-related adverse events were more common with tiotropium. Combined bronchodilator therapy may be a valuable treatment option for patients with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus Vogelmeier
- Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg, Standort Marburg Baldingerstrasse, D-35043 Marburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Steiropoulos P, Tzouvelekis A, Bouros D. Formoterol in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2008; 3:205-15. [PMID: 18686730 PMCID: PMC2629967 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s1059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Bronchodilators represent the hallmark of symptomatic treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). There are four categories of bronchodilators: anticholinergics, methylxanthines, short-acting β2-agonists, and long-acting β2-agonists such as formoterol. Significant research has been performed to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of formoterol in the therapeutic field of COPD. Formoterol exhibits a rapid onset of bronchodilation similar to that observed with salbutamol, yet its long bronchodilatory duration is comparable to salmeterol. In addition, formoterol presents with a clear superiority in lung function improvement compared with either ipratropium bromide or oral theophylline, while its efficacy improves when administered in combination with ipratropium. Formoterol has been shown to better reduce dynamic hyperinflation, which is responsible for exercise intolerance and dyspnea in COPD patients, compared with other bronchodilators, whereas it exerts synergistic effect with tiotropium. Moreover, formoterol reduces exacerbations, increases days free of use of rescue medication and improves patients’ quality of life and disease symptoms. Formoterol has a favorable safety profile and is better tolerated than theophylline. Collectively, data extracted from multicenter clinical trials support formoterol as a valid therapeutic option in the treatment of COPD.
Collapse
|
35
|
Kawayama T, Hoshino T, Ichiki M, Tsuda T, Kinoshita M, Takata S, Koga T, Iwanaga T, Aizawa H. Effect of add-on therapy of tiotropium in COPD treated with theophylline. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2008; 3:137-47. [PMID: 18488437 PMCID: PMC2528215 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s2103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although combination therapy with bronchodilators is recommended for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is insufficient evidence for the efficacy of some combinations of long-acting bronchodilators. OBJECTIVE We investigated the effects of a combination therapy with tiotropium and theophylline in COPD patients. METHODS In a 12-week, open-labeled, parallel-group randomized study, pulmonary functions and dyspnea scores were compared between the combination and theophylline alone therapy at baseline, and 4 and 8 weeks after randomization in COPD. RESULTS Sixty-one COPD patients completed the trial (31 combination therapy, 30 theophylline alone; mean age 70 years; 58 males; mean dyspnea score 2.0 and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.5 L [62.5% predicted]). FEV1 in the combination group, but not in the theophylline alone, was significantly increased at 4 (1.56 +/- 0.13 L, p < 0.001) and 8 weeks (1.60 +/- 0.13 L, p < 0.001) from the baseline (1.40 +/- 0.12 L). In the combination group, but not the theophylline alone group, the dyspnea score was significantly improved after 4 (p < 0.01) and 8 weeks (p <0.05) compared with baseline. In 17 patients who did not receive theophylline at screening, treatment with 4 or 8 weeks of theophylline alone did not improve dyspnea score or FEV1. CONCLUSION Addition of tiotropium therapy to theophylline treatment can improve dyspnea and pulmonary function in COPD. Although this study did not assess whether there was any benefit of adding theophylline to patients treated with tiotropium, tiotropium can be a useful addition in COPD already treated with theophylline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomotaka Kawayama
- Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Formoterol fumarate is an effective treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with moderate or greater severity of airflow obstruction. Published studies indicate that formoterol has a rapid onset of bronchodilation, which may enhance compliance, and sustained bronchodilation over 12 h, which produces a cumulative effect when inhaled twice daily. With long-term use, formoterol fumarate increases trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s and improves measures of hyperinflation, which correlate with relief of symptoms and a decreased need for additional short-acting bronchodilators as rescue treatment. The combination of formoterol with anticholinergic bronchodilators, especially the long-acting anticholinergic tiotropium, appears to further improve bronchodilation, decrease hyperinflation, improve symptoms and decrease the need for rescue therapy, compared with either agent alone. The availability of formoterol fumarate inhalation solution (Perforomist) for treatment of COPD now extends these benefits to patients who prefer nebulizer therapy and/or cannot use metered-dose or dry-powder inhalers effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey B Rubins
- University of Minnesota, Pulmonary 111N, One Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cazzola M, Hanania NA, Jones PW, Mahler DA, Make B, Ohar J, Rennard S. It's about time – directing our attention toward modifying the course of COPD. Respir Med 2008; 102 Suppl 1:S37-48. [DOI: 10.1016/s0954-6111(08)70006-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
38
|
One hundred years of respiratory medicine chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)—Republished article. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmedu.2007.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
39
|
Hanania NA, Sharafkhaneh A. Update on the pharmacologic therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med 2007; 28:589-607, vi-vii. [PMID: 17720046 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2007.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a treatable disease characterized by progressive airflow limitation. Prevention of disease progression; improvement of symptoms, exercise tolerance, and health status; and decrease in exacerbations and mortality are the goals of management. Inhaled short-acting bronchodilators are recommended for symptoms in mild disease, whereas inhaled long-acting bronchodilators are recommended for maintenance therapy of daily symptoms. When symptoms are not controlled using one bronchodilator, combining bronchodilators may be more effective. Combining a long-acting beta-agonist with an inhaled corticosteroid is more effective than either agent alone. Several novel therapies are in different stages of development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola A Hanania
- Asthma Clinical Research Center, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1504 Taub Loop, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Berger WE, Nadel JA. Efficacy and safety of formoterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2007; 102:173-88. [PMID: 18023995 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2007] [Accepted: 09/24/2007] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Formoterol is a selective long-acting beta2-adrenergic receptor agonist (LABA) that provides significant and sustained bronchodilatory effect for up to 12h following a single dose. The onset of effect is significantly faster with formoterol compared with an alternative LABA, salmeterol, although both have a similar duration of action. The overall efficacy of formoterol in improving lung function and controlling symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is comparable to that of salmeterol and potentially superior to that of ipratropium or theophylline. Formoterol provides additional benefit when administered in combination with other bronchodilators or inhaled corticosteroids. In clinical studies, formoterol was well tolerated and had an adverse-event profile similar to that of other beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists. Formoterol is a rapidly acting, well-tolerated, effective beta2-adrenergic receptor agonist that can be regularly used as a long-acting bronchodilator for patients with moderate to severe COPD, as per recommendations of the current treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W E Berger
- Allergy and Asthma Associates of Southern California, 27800 Medical Asthma Associates, Suite 244, Mission Viejo, CA 92691, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
O’Donnell DE, Aaron S, Bourbeau J, Hernandez P, Marciniuk DD, Balter M, Ford G, Gervais A, Goldstein R, Hodder R, Kaplan A, Keenan S, Lacasse Y, Maltais F, Road J, Rocker G, Sin D, Sinuff T, Voduc N. Canadian Thoracic Society recommendations for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - 2007 update. Can Respir J 2007; 14 Suppl B:5B-32B. [PMID: 17885691 PMCID: PMC2806792 DOI: 10.1155/2007/830570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 273] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major respiratory illness in Canada that is both preventable and treatable. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of this complex condition continues to grow and our ability to offer effective treatment to those who suffer from it has improved considerably. The purpose of the present educational initiative of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) is to provide up to date information on new developments in the field so that patients with this condition will receive optimal care that is firmly based on scientific evidence. Since the previous CTS management recommendations were published in 2003, a wealth of new scientific information has become available. The implications of this new knowledge with respect to optimal clinical care have been carefully considered by the CTS Panel and the conclusions are presented in the current document. Highlights of this update include new epidemiological information on mortality and prevalence of COPD, which charts its emergence as a major health problem for women; a new section on common comorbidities in COPD; an increased emphasis on the meaningful benefits of combined pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies; and a new discussion on the prevention of acute exacerbations. A revised stratification system for severity of airway obstruction is proposed, together with other suggestions on how best to clinically evaluate individual patients with this complex disease. The results of the largest randomized clinical trial ever undertaken in COPD have recently been published, enabling the Panel to make evidence-based recommendations on the role of modern pharmacotherapy. The Panel hopes that these new practice guidelines, which reflect a rigorous analysis of the recent literature, will assist caregivers in the diagnosis and management of this common condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alan Kaplan
- Family Physician Airways Group of Canada, Richmond Hill, Ontario
| | - Sean Keenan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | | | | | - Jeremy Road
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | | | - Don Sin
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | | | - Nha Voduc
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
De Backer JW, Vos WG, Devolder A, Verhulst SL, Germonpré P, Wuyts FL, Parizel PM, De Backer W. Computational fluid dynamics can detect changes in airway resistance in asthmatics after acute bronchodilation. J Biomech 2007; 41:106-13. [PMID: 17698073 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2007] [Revised: 06/18/2007] [Accepted: 07/08/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The effect of a bronchodilator in asthmatics is only partially described by changes in spirometric values since no information on regional differences can be obtained. Imaging techniques like high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) provide further information but lack detailed information on specific airway responses. The aim of the present study was to improve the actual imaging techniques by subsequent analysis of the imaging data using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We studied 14 mild to moderately severe asthmatics. Ten patients underwent HRCT before and 4h after inhalation of a novel long acting beta(2) agonist (LABA) that acts shortly after inhalation. Four patients were studied for chronic effects and underwent CT scans twice after adequate wash-out of bronchodilators. In the active group, a significant bronchodilator response was seen with a forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) increase of 8.78 +/- -6.27% pred vs -3.38 +/- 6.87% pred in the control group. The changes in FEV1 correlated significantly with the changes in distal airway volume (r = 0.69, p = 0.007), total airway resistance (r = -0.73, p = 0.003) and distal airway resistance (r = -0.76, p = 0.002) as calculated with the CFD method. The changes in distal R(aw) were not fully homogeneous. In some patients with normal FEV1 at baseline, CFD-based changes in R(aw) were still detectable. We conclude that CFD calculations, based on airway geometries of asthmatic patients, provide additional information about changes in regional R(aw). All changes in the CFD-based calculated R(aw) significantly correlate with the observed changes in spirometric values therefore validating the CFD method for the studied application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W De Backer
- Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Santus P, Centanni S, Morelli N, Di Marco F, Verga M, Cazzola M. Tiotropium is less likely to induce oxygen desaturation in stable COPD patients compared to long-acting β2-agonists. Respir Med 2007; 101:1798-803. [PMID: 17399972 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2007] [Revised: 02/11/2007] [Accepted: 02/12/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
In a three-way crossover pilot study, the acute effects of tiotropium 18 microg inhalation on the respiratory function and arterial blood gas tensions of 30 patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were compared with those of salmeterol 50 microg and formoterol 12 microg. In each study day, lung function and arterial blood gas analyses were performed before and up to 180 min after inhalation. All treatments significantly improved lung function, increased DLco, decreased PaO2, and increased P(A-a)O2, with no change in PaCO2. The effects of salmeterol and tiotropium on PaO2 were slower in onset and more prolonged than those of formoterol but PaO2AUC0-180 min was significantly greater for formoterol and salmeterol than for tiotropium. It is likely that the significant but small decreases in PaO2 and increases in P(A-a)O2 have been caused by pulmonary vasodilator effects. Since the three agents were similar in inducing bronchodilation, we believe that tiotropium is preferable in patients with hypoxemia caused by stable COPD because it seems to carry a smaller risk of worsening systemic hypoxemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierachille Santus
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, University of Milan, S. Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasing health problem and one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, but knowledge about its pathogenesis has increased substantially in recent years. The disease results from interaction between individual risk factors (like enzymatic deficiencies) and environmental exposures to noxious agents, like cigarette smoking, occupational dusts, air pollution and infections in childhood. The main mechanisms that may contribute to airflow limitation in COPD are fixed narrowing of small airways, emphysema and luminal obstruction with mucus secretions. COPD is characterised by a chronic inflammatory process in the pulmonary tissue, with a pattern different from bronchial asthma, associated with extrapulmonary effects and is considered now a complex, systemic disease. Optimal therapeutic targeting of COPD depends on a clear understanding of the precise mechanisms of these complex processes and on early and correct evaluation of disease severity. A combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches is used to treat COPD. Bronchodilators are the mainstay of COPD treatment and can be combined with inhaled corticosteroids for greater efficacy and fewer side effects. The use of LTOT for hypoxemic patients has resulted in increased survival, and expanded drug therapy options have effectively improved dyspnoea and quality of life. Recent studies have documented the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation. In addition, non-invasive mechanical ventilation offers new alternatives for patients with acute or chronic failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Cazzola
- Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Diseases, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Anticholinergics have been used to treat obstructive respiratory disease for many years from historical preparations of the deadly nightshade genus, to the more recent developments ofipratropium, oxitropium, and tiotropium. The medical treatment of airways obstruction has focused on achieving maximal airway function through bronchodilators. Of the two main bronchodilators, beta2-agonists are often the first treatment choice although there is evidence of equivalence and some suggestions of the superiority of anticholinergics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The following review looks at the background of anticholinergics, their pharmacological properties, and the evidence for use with suggestions for their place in the treatment of COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Scullion
- University Hospitals of Leicester Glenfield Site, Institute for Lung Health, Leicester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cazzola M, Matera MG. The effective treatment of COPD: Anticholinergics and what else? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ddstr.2006.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|