1
|
Chow R, So OW, Im JHB, Chapman KR, Orchanian-Cheff A, Gershon AS, Wu R. Predictors of Readmission, for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) - A Systematic Review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:2581-2617. [PMID: 38022828 PMCID: PMC10664718 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s418295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third-leading cause of death globally and is responsible for over 3 million deaths annually. One of the factors contributing to the significant healthcare burden for these patients is readmission. The aim of this review is to describe significant predictors and prediction scores for all-cause and COPD-related readmission among patients with COPD. Methods A search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from database inception to June 7, 2022. Studies were included if they reported on patients at least 40 years old with COPD, readmission data within 1 year, and predictors of readmission. Study quality was assessed. Significant predictors of readmission and the degree of significance, as noted by the p-value, were extracted for each study. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022337035). Results In total, 242 articles reporting on 16,471,096 patients were included. There was a low risk of bias across the literature. Of these, 153 studies were observational, reporting on predictors; 57 studies were observational studies reporting on interventions; and 32 were randomized controlled trials of interventions. Sixty-four significant predictors for all-cause readmission and 23 for COPD-related readmission were reported across the literature. Significant predictors included 1) pre-admission patient characteristics, such as male sex, prior hospitalization, poor performance status, number and type of comorbidities, and use of long-term oxygen; 2) hospitalization details, such as length of stay, use of corticosteroids, and use of ventilatory support; 3) results of investigations, including anemia, lower FEV1, and higher eosinophil count; and 4) discharge characteristics, including use of home oxygen and discharge to long-term care or a skilled nursing facility. Conclusion The findings from this review may enable better predictive modeling and can be used by clinicians to better inform their clinical gestalt of readmission risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Chow
- University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Olivia W So
- University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - James H B Im
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kenneth R Chapman
- University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Andrea S Gershon
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Wu
- University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Strange C, Tkacz J, Schinkel J, Lewing B, Agatep B, Swisher S, Patel S, Edwards D, Touchette DR, Portillo E, Feigler N, Pollack M. Exacerbations and Real-World Outcomes After Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy of Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate, Among Patients with COPD: Results from the EROS (US) Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:2245-2256. [PMID: 37849918 PMCID: PMC10577086 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s432963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Triple therapy to prevent exacerbations from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with improved health compared to single and dual-agent therapy in some populations. This study assessed the benefits of prompt administration of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) following a COPD exacerbation. Patients and methods EROS was a retrospective analysis of people with COPD using the MORE2 Registry®. Inclusion required ≥1 severe, ≥2 moderate, or ≥1 moderate exacerbation while on other maintenance treatment. Within 12 months following the index exacerbation, ≥1 pharmacy claim for BGF was required. Primary outcomes were the rate of COPD exacerbations and healthcare costs for those that received BGF promptly (within 30 days of index exacerbation) versus delayed (31-180 days) and very delayed (181-365 days). The effect of each 30-day delay in initiation of BGF was estimated using a multivariable negative binomial regression model. Results 2409 patients were identified: 434 prompt, 1187 delayed, and 788 very delayed. The rate (95% CI) of total exacerbations post-index increased as time to BGF initiation increased: prompt 1.52 (1.39-1.66); delayed 2.00 (1.92-2.09); and very delayed 2.30 (2.20-2.40). Adjusting for patient characteristics, each 30-day delay in receiving BGF was associated with a 5% increase in the average number of subsequent exacerbations (rate ratio, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.01-1.08; p<0.05). Prompt initiation of BGF was also associated with lower post-index annualized COPD-related costs ($5002 for prompt vs $7639 and $8724 for the delayed and very delayed groups, respectively). Conclusion Following a COPD exacerbation, promptly initiating BGF was associated with a reduction in subsequent exacerbations and reduced healthcare utilization and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlie Strange
- College of Medicine, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Sean Swisher
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Sushma Patel
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | | | - Daniel R Touchette
- College of Pharmacy - Pharmacy Systems Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Edward Portillo
- Pharmacy Practice & Translational Research Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Norbert Feigler
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Michael Pollack
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Evans KA, Pollack M, Portillo E, Strange C, Touchette DR, Staresinic A, Patel S, Tkacz J, Feigler N. Prompt initiation of triple therapy following hospitalization for a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation in the United States: An analysis of the PRIMUS study. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2022; 28:1366-1377. [PMID: 36427341 PMCID: PMC10372961 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.12.1366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Severe exacerbations requiring hospitalization contribute a substantial portion of the morbidity and costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Triple therapy (inhaled corticosteroid + long-acting β-agonist + long-acting muscarinic antagonist) is a recommended option for patients who experience recurrent COPD exacerbations or persistent symptoms. Few real-world studies have specifically examined the effect of prompt initiation of triple therapy, specifically among patients hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether prompt initiation of triple therapy following a severe COPD exacerbation was associated with lower risk of subsequent exacerbations and lower health care use and costs and the effects of each 30-day delay of initiation. METHODS: Adults aged 40 years or older with COPD were identified in the Merative MarketScan Databases between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, and were required to meet the following criteria: open or closed triple therapy (date of first closed prescription or last component of open=index treatment date), more than 1 inpatient admission with a primary COPD diagnosis (ie, severe exacerbation) in the prior 12 months (index exacerbation), 12 months of continuous enrollment before (baseline) and after (follow-up) index exacerbation, and absence of select respiratory diseases and cancer. Patients were stratified based on timing of open or closed triple therapy after the index exacerbation: prompt (≤30 days), delayed (31-180 days), or very delayed (181-365 days). Multivariable regression controlled for baseline characteristics (age, sex, insurance type, index year, comorbidities, prior treatment, and prior exacerbations) and estimated the odds of subsequent exacerbations, change in the number of exacerbations, and change in health care costs during 12-month follow-up associated with each 30-day delay of triple therapy initiation. RESULTS: A total of 6,772 patients met inclusion criteria (2,968 [43.8%] prompt, 1,998 [29.5%] delayed, and 1,806 [26.7%] very delayed). The adjusted odds of any exacerbation and a severe exacerbation during 12-month follow-up increased by 13% (odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.13 [1.11-1.15]) and 10% (1.10 [1.08-1.12]), respectively, for each 30-day delay in triple therapy initiation, and the mean number of exacerbations increased by 5.4% (95% CI = 4.7%-6.1%). There was a 3.0% increase (95% CI = 2.2%-3.8%) in mean all-cause costs and a 3.7% increase (95% CI = 2.9%-4.6%) in total COPD-related costs for each 30-day delay of triple therapy initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Longer delays in triple therapy initiation after a COPD hospitalization result in greater risk of subsequent exacerbations and higher health care resource use and costs. Adequate post-discharge follow-up care and earlier consideration of triple therapy may improve clinical and economic outcomes among patients with COPD. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by AstraZeneca. Dr Evans is employed by Merative, formerly IBM Watson Health, and Mr Tkacz was employed by IBM Watson Health at the time of this study; Merative/IBM Watson Health received funding from AstraZeneca to conduct this study. Mr Pollack, Dr Staresinic, Dr Feigler, and Dr Patel are employed by AstraZeneca. Dr Touchette, Dr Portillo, and Dr Strange are paid consultants to AstraZeneca. Dr Strange also participates in research grants paid to the Medical University of South Carolina by AstraZeneca, CSA Medical, and Nuvaira, and is a consultant to GlaxoSmithKline, Morair, and PulManage regarding COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin A Evans
- Real World Data Research and Analytics, Merative, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Edward Portillo
- Pharmacy Practice Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy
| | - Charlie Strange
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Daniel R Touchette
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois College of Pharmacy, Chicago
| | | | - Sushma Patel
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE
| | - Joseph Tkacz
- Life Sciences, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, now with Inovalon, Washington DC
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tkacz J, Evans KA, Touchette DR, Portillo E, Strange C, Staresinic A, Feigler N, Patel S, Pollack M. PRIMUS – Prompt Initiation of Maintenance Therapy in the US: A Real-World Analysis of Clinical and Economic Outcomes Among Patients Initiating Triple Therapy Following a COPD Exacerbation. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:329-342. [PMID: 35177901 PMCID: PMC8843423 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s347735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may experience moderate (requiring outpatient care) or severe (requiring hospitalization) disease exacerbations. Guidelines recommend escalation from dual to triple therapy (inhaled corticosteroid + long-acting beta agonist + long-acting muscarinic antagonist) after two moderate or one severe exacerbation in a year. This study examined whether prompt initiation of triple therapy lowers risk of future exacerbations and reduces healthcare costs, compared to delayed/very delayed triple therapy after an exacerbation. Patients and Methods This retrospective observational study of US healthcare claims included patients ≥40 years old with COPD who initiated triple therapy (1/1/2011–3/31/2020) after ≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation in the prior year. The earliest of the second moderate or first severe exacerbation was the index date. Patients were stratified by triple therapy timing: prompt (≤30 days post-index), delayed (31–180 days), very delayed (181–365 days). COPD exacerbations, all-cause and COPD-related healthcare utilization and costs were assessed during 12 months post-index (follow-up). Multivariable regression estimated the effect of each 30-day delay in triple therapy on the odds of exacerbations, number of exacerbations, and costs during follow-up, controlling for patient characteristics. Results A total of 24,770 patients were included: 7577 prompt, 9676 delayed, 7517 very delayed. Each 30-day delay of triple therapy was associated with 11% and 7% increases in the odds of any exacerbation and a severe exacerbation, respectively (odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.11 [1.10–1.13] and 1.07 [1.05–1.08]), a 4.3% (95% CI: 3.9–4.6%) increase in the number of exacerbations, a 1.8% (95% CI: 1.3–2.3%) increase in all-cause costs, and a 2.1% (95% CI: 1.6–2.6%) increase in COPD-related costs during follow-up. Conclusion Promptly initiating triple therapy after two moderate or one severe exacerbation is associated with decreased morbidity and economic burden in COPD. Proactive disease management may be warranted to prevent future exacerbations and lower costs among patients with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Tkacz
- Life Sciences, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Daniel R Touchette
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Edward Portillo
- Pharmacy Practice Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Charlie Strange
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Anthony Staresinic
- BioPharmaceuticals, US Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Norbert Feigler
- BioPharmaceuticals, US Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Sushma Patel
- BioPharmaceuticals, US Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Michael Pollack
- BioPharmaceuticals, US Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
- Correspondence: Michael Pollack, AstraZeneca, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE, 19850, USA, Tel +1 302 377 4911, Email
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharpe I, Bowman M, Kim A, Srivastava S, Jalink M, Wijeratne DT. Strategies to Prevent Readmissions to Hospital for COPD: A Systematic Review. COPD 2021; 18:456-468. [PMID: 34378468 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2021.1955338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience high rates of hospital readmissions, placing substantial clinical and economic strain on the healthcare system. Therefore, it is essential to implement evidence-based strategies for preventing these readmissions. The primary objective of our systematic review was to identify and describe the domains of existing primary research on strategies aimed at reducing hospital readmissions among adult patients with COPD. We also aimed to identify existing gaps in the literature to facilitate future research efforts. A total of 843 studies were captured by the initial search and 96 were included in the final review (25 randomized controlled trials, 37 observational studies, and 34 non-randomized interventional studies). Of the included studies, 72% (n = 69) were considered low risk of bias. The majority of included studies (n = 76) evaluated patient-level readmission prevention strategies (medication and other treatments (n = 25), multi-modal (n = 19), follow-up (n = 16), telehealth (n = 8), education and coaching (n = 8)). Fewer assessed broader system- (n = 13) and policy-level (n = 7) strategies. We observed a trend toward reduced all-cause readmissions with the use of medication and other treatments, as well as a trend toward reduced COPD-related readmissions with the use of multi-modal and broader scale system-level interventions. Notably, much of this evidence supported shorter-term (30-day) readmission outcomes, while little evidence was available for longer-term outcomes. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as considerable between-study heterogeneity was also identified. Overall, this review identified several evidence-based interventions for reducing readmissions among patients with COPD that should be targeted for future research.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2021.1955338 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isobel Sharpe
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Meghan Bowman
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Kim
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Siddhartha Srivastava
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew Jalink
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Don Thiwanka Wijeratne
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Axson EL, Lewis A, Potts J, Pang M, Dickinson S, Vioix H, Quint JK. Inhaled therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036455. [PMID: 32994234 PMCID: PMC7526304 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To integrate evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on the efficacy of inhaled treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using network meta-analyses. METHODS Systematic searches MEDLINE and Embase based on predetermined criteria. Network meta-analyses of RCTs investigated efficacy on exacerbations (long-term: ≥20 weeks of treatment; short-term: <20 weeks), lung function (≥12 weeks), health-related quality of life, mortality and adverse events. Qualitative comparisons of efficacies between RCTs and observational studies. RESULTS 212 RCTs and 19 observational studies were included. Compared with combined long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA+LAMA), triple therapy (LABA+LAMA+inhaled corticosteroid) was significantly more effective at reducing exacerbations (long-term 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78 to 0.94; short-term 0.67 (95% CI: 0.49 to 0.92)) and mortality (0.72 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.89)) but was also associated with increased pneumonia (1.35 (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.67)). No differences in lung function (0.02 (95% CI: -0.10 to 0.14)), health-related quality of life (-1.12 (95% CI: -3.83 to 1.59)) or other adverse events (1.02 (95% CI: 0.96 to 1.08)) were found. Most of the observational evidence trended in the same direction as pooled RCT data. CONCLUSION Further evidence, especially pragmatic trials, are needed to fully understand the characteristics of patient subgroups who may benefit from triple therapy and for those whom the extra risk of adverse events, such as pneumonia, may outweigh any benefits. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018088013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor L Axson
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Adam Lewis
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James Potts
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer K Quint
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gothe H, Rajsic S, Vukicevic D, Schoenfelder T, Jahn B, Geiger-Gritsch S, Brixner D, Popper N, Endel G, Siebert U. Algorithms to identify COPD in health systems with and without access to ICD coding: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:737. [PMID: 31640678 PMCID: PMC6805625 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4574-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Estimation of incidence, prevalence and disease burden through routine insurance data is challenging because of under-diagnosis and under-treatment, particularly for early stage disease in health care systems where outpatient International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnoses are not collected. This poses the question of which criteria are commonly applied to identify COPD patients in claims datasets in the absence of ICD diagnoses, and which information can be used as a substitute. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize previously reported methodological approaches for the identification of COPD patients through routine data and to compile potential criteria for the identification of COPD patients if ICD codes are not available. Methods A systematic literature review was performed in Medline via PubMed and Google Scholar from January 2000 through October 2018, followed by a manual review of the included studies by at least two independent raters. Study characteristics and all identifying criteria used in the studies were systematically extracted from the publications, categorized, and compiled in evidence tables. Results In total, the systematic search yielded 151 publications. After title and abstract screening, 38 publications were included into the systematic assessment. In these studies, the most frequently used (22/38) criteria set to identify COPD patients included ICD codes, hospitalization, and ambulatory visits. Only four out of 38 studies used methods other than ICD coding. In a significant proportion of studies, the age range of the target population (33/38) and hospitalization (30/38) were provided. Ambulatory data were included in 24, physician claims in 22, and pharmaceutical data in 18 studies. Only five studies used spirometry, two used surgery and one used oxygen therapy. Conclusions A variety of different criteria is used for the identification of COPD from routine data. The most promising criteria set in data environments where ambulatory diagnosis codes are lacking is the consideration of additional illness-related information with special attention to pharmacotherapy data. Further health services research should focus on the application of more systematic internal and/or external validation approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holger Gothe
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Zentrum 1, A-6060, Hall i.T., Austria. .,Medical Faculty "Carl Gustav Carus", Technical University Dresden, Loescherstrasse 18, D-01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Sasa Rajsic
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Zentrum 1, A-6060, Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Djurdja Vukicevic
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Zentrum 1, A-6060, Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Tonio Schoenfelder
- Medical Faculty "Carl Gustav Carus", Technical University Dresden, Loescherstrasse 18, D-01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Beate Jahn
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Zentrum 1, A-6060, Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Sabine Geiger-Gritsch
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Zentrum 1, A-6060, Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Diana Brixner
- University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Niki Popper
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Zentrum 1, A-6060, Hall i.T., Austria.,, dwh Gmbh, Neustiftgasse 57-59, A-1070, Vienna, Austria.,TU Wien, Research Unit of Information and Software Engineering, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gottfried Endel
- Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Technology Assessment, Main Association of Austrian Social Insurance Institutions, Kundmanngasse 21, A-1031, Vienna, Austria
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Zentrum 1, A-6060, Hall i.T., Austria.,Division of Health Technology Assessment and Bioinformatics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.,Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bell CF, Coutinho AD, Farrelly E, Lokhandwala T, Landsman-Blumberg P. Clinical and economic outcomes associated with the use of fluticasone propionate 250 mcg and salmeterol 50 mcg combination versus tiotropium bromide 18 mcg as initial maintenance treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in managed care. J Med Econ 2018; 21:629-638. [PMID: 29577787 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1457532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To examine the clinical and economic outcomes associated with the use of long-acting bronchodilators for initial maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by analyzing health insurance claims data in the US. METHODS A retrospective, observational, matched cohort study used health insurance claims data (January 2008 to June 2013) to assess COPD-related outcomes for subjects aged ≥40 years. Subjects were assigned to a study cohort according to the first observed prescription fill for a long-acting bronchodilator (fluticasone propionate 250 mcg/salmeterol 50 mcg [FSC] or tiotropium bromide 18 mcg [TIO]). The analysis period for each subject comprised a 1-year pre-index date and 1-year post-index date. Primary outcome measure was total COPD-related costs per-patient per-year (PPPY) during the follow-up period. Secondary outcome measures included COPD-related exacerbations and the components of COPD-related costs. RESULTS Overall, 24,040 subjects were identified; the analysis sample consisted of 19,090 subjects (9,545 per cohort) with no significant differences between cohorts. Mean COPD-related total costs PPPY were numerically lower among the FSC cohort; however, the difference was not statistically significant ($2,224 [±4,108] vs $2,352 [±3,721], p = .057). There was no difference between cohorts for COPD-related medical costs (p = .894). COPD-related pharmacy costs were significantly, yet modestly, lower in the FSC cohort compared with the TIO cohort ($1,160 [±1,106] vs 1,275 [±1,110], p < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate or number of exacerbations between the matched cohorts. LIMITATIONS While propensity scoring achieved balance in baseline characteristics, some residual confounding unobserved in the database may be present. CONCLUSIONS Few clinical and economic differences between subjects initiating maintenance therapy with FSC or TIO were observed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Roberts MH, Borrego ME, Kharat AA, Marshik PL, Mapel DW. Economic evaluations of fluticasone-propionate/salmeterol combination therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of published studies. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2016; 16:167-92. [PMID: 26839089 DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1148602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
This review identifies and evaluates the comprehensive reporting of peer-reviewed economic evaluations of the effectiveness of fluticasone-propionate/salmeterol combination (FSC) therapy for maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Economic evaluations were included if published in English since 2003. Evaluation categories included in the review were cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-consequence analyses. FSC is cost-effective in comparison to short-acting bronchodilators (SABDs). Cost and outcome differences between FSC and other long-acting therapies were modest. Studies exhibited large variations in populations, designs and environment, limiting the ability to draw conclusions. Many new maintenance treatments for COPD have been approved since 2010. Most have yet to be compared to older treatments like FSC. Evaluations are needed that consider costs and outcomes from a societal perspective (e.g., patients' ability to keep working) and evaluations that include subgroup analyses to investigate differential impacts according to clusters of patient characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H Roberts
- a Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences , University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy , Albuquerque , NM , USA.,b LCF Research, Health Services Research Division , Albuquerque , NM , USA
| | - M E Borrego
- a Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences , University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy , Albuquerque , NM , USA
| | - A A Kharat
- a Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences , University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy , Albuquerque , NM , USA
| | - P L Marshik
- a Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences , University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy , Albuquerque , NM , USA
| | - D W Mapel
- b LCF Research, Health Services Research Division , Albuquerque , NM , USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reducing the Readmission Burden of COPD: A Focused Review of Recent Interventions. CURRENT EMERGENCY AND HOSPITAL MEDICINE REPORTS 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s40138-014-0050-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
11
|
Breunig IM, Shaya FT, Scharf SM. Delivering cost–effective care for COPD in the USA: recent progress and current challenges. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014; 12:725-31. [DOI: 10.1586/erp.12.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
12
|
Pasquale MK, Sun SX, Song F, Hartnett HJ, Stemkowski SA. Impact of exacerbations on health care cost and resource utilization in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with chronic bronchitis from a predominantly Medicare population. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2012; 7:757-64. [PMID: 23152680 PMCID: PMC3496536 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s36997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) lead to significant increases in resource utilization and cost to the health care system. COPD patients with chronic bronchitis and a history of exacerbations pose an additional burden to the system. This study examined health care utilization and cost among these patients. METHODS For this retrospective analysis, data were extracted from a large national health plan with a predominantly Medicare population. This study involved patients who were aged 40-89 years, had been enrolled continuously for 24 months or more, had at least two separate insurance claims for COPD with chronic bronchitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 491.xx), and had pharmacy claims for COPD maintenance medications between January 1, 2007, and March 31, 2009. Two years of data were examined for each patient; the index date was defined as the first occurrence of COPD. Baseline characteristics were obtained from the first year of data, with health outcomes tracked in the second year. Severe exacerbation was defined by COPD-related hospitalization or death; moderate exacerbation was defined by oral or parenteral corticosteroid use. Adjusted numbers of exacerbations and COPD-related costs per patient were estimated controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS The final study sample involved 8554 patients; mean age was 70.1±8.6 years and 49.8% of the overall population had exacerbation, 13.9% had a severe exacerbation only, 29.1% had a moderate exacerbation only, and 6.8% had both a severe and moderate exacerbation. COPD-related mean annual costs were $4069 (all figures given in US dollars) for the overall population and $6381 for patients with two or more exacerbations. All-cause health care costs were $18,976 for the overall population and $23,901 for patients with history of two or more exacerbations. Severity of exacerbations, presence of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and long-term oxygen use were associated with higher adjusted costs. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that despite treatment with maintenance medications, COPD patients continue to have exacerbations resulting in higher costs. New medications and disease management interventions are warranted to reduce the severity and frequency of exacerbations and the related cost impact of the disease.
Collapse
|