Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and antigen identification--An alternate approach

Longitudinal changes in serum immunoglobulin G testing in patients with fibrotic avian hypersensitivity pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of the antigen responsible for fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is challenging. Serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G testing against HP-associated antigens is performed. Although single-serum IgG testing has been investigated, multiple-serum IgG testing has not yet been studied.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent histopathological examination and positive inhalation challenge test as well as those with moderate or high HP guideline confidence level. Serum IgG testing against pigeon serum was conducted twice using two methods: enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and ImmunoCAP. The association between changes in serum IgG antibody titers and changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) and other parameters was investigated.

RESULTS

In this study, 28 patients (mean age, 64.5 years; mean FVC, 85.3%) with fibrotic avian HP were selected, of whom 20 and 8 underwent surgical lung biopsy and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, respectively. Of the 28 patients, 19 had been keeping birds for more than 6 months. A correlation was observed between the annual changes in serum IgG antibody titers by ELISA and changes in relative FVC (r =  - 0.6221, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a correlation between the annual changes in serum IgG antibody titers by ImmunoCAP and changes in relative FVC (r =  - 0.4302, p = 0.022). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the change in serum IgG antibody titers by both ELISA and ImmunoCAP also influenced the relative FVC change (p = 0.012 and p = 0.015, respectively). Moreover, 13 patients were given additional treatments between the first and second blood test; however, the additional treatment group was not significantly different in relative FVC change compared to the group with no additional treatment (p = 0.982).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with fibrotic avian HP, the annual changes in serum IgG testing were correlated with FVC changes, highlighting the importance of serum IgG testing over time.

Japanese clinical practice guide 2022 for hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Considering recently published two guidelines for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) has now published its own Japanese clinical practice guide for HP. Major types of HP in Japan include summer-type, home-related, bird-related, farmer's lung, painter's lung, humidifier lung, and mushroom grower's lung. Identifying causative antigens is critical for increasing diagnostic confidence, as well as improving prognosis through appropriate antigen avoidance. This guide proposes a comprehensive antigen questionnaire including the outbreak sources reported in Japan. Drawing on the 2021 CHEST guideline, this guide highlights the antigen identification confidence level and adaptations for environmental surveys. The detection of specific antibodies against causative antigens is an important diagnostic predictor of HP. In Japan, the assessments of bird-specific IgG (pigeons, budgerigars) and the Trichosporon asahii antibody are covered by medical insurance. Although this guide adopts the 2020 ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline diagnostic criteria based on the combination of imaging findings, exposure assessment, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis, and histopathological findings, it added some annotations to facilitate the interpretation of the content and correlate the medical situation in Japan. It recommends checking biomarkers; seasonal changes in the KL-6 concentration (increase in winter for bird-related HP/humidifier lung and in summer for summer-type HP) and high KL-6 concentrations providing a basis for the suspicion of HP. Antigen avoidance is critical for disease management of HP. This guide also addresses the pharmacological management of HP, highlighting the treatment strategy for fibrotic HP including combination therapies with anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive and antifibrotic drugs.

Sensitization to avian and fungal proteins in different work environments

INTRODUCTION

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is usually caused by the inhalation of avian and fungal proteins. The present study assesses a cohort of Urban Pest Surveillance and Control Service (UPSCS) workers with high exposure to avian and fungal antigens, in order to identify their degree of sensitization and the potential risk of developing HP.

METHODS

Workers were divided according to their work activity into Nest pruners (Group 1) and Others (Group 2). All individuals underwent a medical interview, pulmonary function tests and the determination of specific IgG antibodies. Antigenic proteins of pigeon sera were analysed using two-dimensional immunoblotting. Proteins of interest were sequenced by liquid-chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).

RESULTS

101 workers were recruited (76 men, average age: 42 yrs); (Group 1 = 41, Group 2 = 60). Up to 30% of the study population exhibited increased levels of IgGs to pigeon, small parrot and parrot, and up to 60% showed high levels of Aspergillus and Penicillium IgGs. In Group 1, specific parakeet and Mucor IgGs were higher (p = 0.044 and 0.003 respectively) while DLCO/VA% were lower (p = 0.008) than in Group 2. Two-dimensional immunoblotting showed protein bands of 20-30 KDa recognized by HP patients but not by workers. LC-MS analysis identified Ig Lambda chain and Apolipoprotein A-I as candidate proteins for distinguishing HP patients from exposed workers.

CONCLUSIONS

Two pigeon proteins were identified that may play a role in the development of pathological differences between HP patients and exposed workers. DLCO/VA may have a predictive value in the development of HP disease.

YKL-40 and KL-6 Levels in Serum and Sputum of Patients Diagnosed With Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

YKL-40 (chitinase 3-like-1) and Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) are 2 promising biomarkers that may have an important role in the management of interstitial lung diseases (ILD).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the values of KL-6 and YKL-40 as biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study conducted in 49 patients diagnosed with HP due to exposure to birds (n = 32) or fungi (n = 17), 48 patients with other ILD, and 67 healthy volunteers. Patients with HP were divided into fibrotic and nonfibrotic. Serum and sputum YKL-40 and KL-6 levels were determined using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of both biomarkers for the diagnosis of HP. Pulmonary function tests were performed in patients during follow-up.

RESULTS

KL-6 and YKL-40 levels were significantly higher in serum of patients with HP exposed to birds with a fibrotic pattern than in controls (P < .0001 and .0055, respectively). Serum KL-6 levels were also significantly higher in patients with fibrotic HP exposed to fungi compared with the control group (P = .0001). In patients with HP exposed to fungi, sputum KL-6 and YKL-40 levels were higher in those with a fibrotic pattern (P = .0289 and .016, respectively). ROC analysis showed that the range between 55-121 ng/mL for serum YKL-40 levels and 346-1441 U/mL for serum KL-6 levels had the best sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between patients with HP, healthy controls, and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In patients with HP, serum KL-6 levels correlated negatively with total lung capacity (r = -0.485; P = .0103) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (r = -0.534; P = .0002) at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Both KL-6 and YKL-40 proteins seem to be capable of distinguishing patients with HP from healthy individuals and from patients with IPF. Their sensitivity and specificity confirm their potential role as biomarkers. KL-6 may also be a predictor of disease progression.

Validation of inhalation challenge test and serum immunoglobulin G test for bird-related fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

The inhalation challenge test is considered to be the item for diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and identifying the causative antigen in patients with fibrotic HP. However, the inhalation challenge test is not widely used.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the values of the inhalation challenge test by comparing with serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G test.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study. The patients with fibrotic HP were diagnosed pathologically by surgical lung biopsy or transbronchial lung cryobiopsy and were assumed to have bird-related fibrotic HP if they had a history of obvious avian exposure.

RESULTS

On the basis of pathologic findings and history of avian exposure, 43 of 86 patients were diagnosed with having bird-related fibrotic HP. In 43 patients with bird-related fibrotic HP, 15 (35%) were positive for anti-bird IgG antibody and 36 (84%) were positive for the inhalation challenge test; in addition, the specificity of the inhalation challenge test was 67%. Patients with both positive results from inhalation challenge test and anti-bird IgG antibodies had a 2.7% decline in annual forced vital capacity (FVC) before the inhalation (P = .02). In patients with positive result from inhalation challenge test and negative result from anti-bird IgG antibodies, the annual FVC decreased by 5.8% (P = .03). FVC was not consistent in patients with positive result from the anti-bird IgG antibodies.

CONCLUSION

The inhalation challenge test for bird-related fibrotic HP was more sensitive than the anti-bird IgG antibodies. Furthermore, the inhalation challenge test could select patients with similar disease progression.

Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: A Practical Review of Current Approaches

Recent advances in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis include improved diagnostic guidance, systematic assessments of immunosuppressive therapy, and the recent availability of antifibrotic therapy (nintedanib) for those with progressive disease. A standardized approach to diagnosis may lead to better inclusion criteria for future therapeutic protocols and delineation of disease or treatment response predictors for real-world management. This review will highlight current diagnostic and treatment challenges and remaining knowledge gaps or areas of uncertainty, with a practical overview of supporting evidence and its clinical implications. Exposure history, serologic testing for antigen sensitivity, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis, histopathology, and radiologic findings will be covered in the diagnosis section, with immunosuppression, antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, and disease prognosis in the treatment and management section.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: Current concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease caused by an aberrant response to an inhaled exposure, which results in mostly T cell-mediated inflammation, granuloma formation, and fibrosis in some cases. HP is diagnosed by exposure identification, HRCT findings of ground-glass opacities, centrilobular nodules, and mosaic attenuation, with traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing in fibrotic cases. Additional testing including serum IgG testing for the presence of antigen exposure, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis, and lung biopsy demonstrating granulomas, inflammation, and fibrosis, increases the diagnostic confidence. Treatment for HP includes avoidance of the implicated exposure, immunosuppression, and anti-fibrotic therapy in select cases. This narrative review presents the recent literature in the understanding of the immunopathological mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of HP.

Barriers to antigen detection and avoidance in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the United States

Background

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) is an interstitial lung disease (ILD) caused by long term exposure to an offending antigen. Antigen avoidance is associated with improved outcomes. We are unable to identify the antigen source in approximately half of patients. When an antigen is successfully identified, patients have difficulty with avoidance.

Methods

We conducted three structured group discussions with US based ILD specialists utilizing the nominal group technique (NGT). Participants listed barriers to antigen detection and avoidance in CHP. Each participant ranked what they perceived to be the top three barriers in the list in terms of importance. The master list of barriers was consolidated across the three groups into themes that were prioritized based on receiving the highest rankings by participants.

Results

Twenty-five physicians participated; 56% had experience caring for CHP patients for ≥ 16 years. Sixty barriers to antigen detection were categorized into seven themes of which the top three were: 1. unclear significance of identified exposures; 2. gaps in clinical knowledge and testing capabilities; 3. there are many unknown and undiscovered antigens. Twenty-eight barriers to antigen avoidance were categorized into five themes of which the top three were: 1. patient limitations, financial barriers and lack of resources; 2. individual patient beliefs, emotions and attachments to the antigen source; and 3. gaps in clinical knowledge and testing capabilities.

Conclusions

This study uncovered challenges at the individual patient, organizational, and societal levels and ranked them in terms of level of importance. These findings provide information to guide development and validation of multidisciplinary support and interventions geared towards antigen identification and avoidance in CHP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01817-6.

Questionnaires or Serum Immunoglobulin G Testing in the Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis among Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease

Rationale: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) results from exposure to a variety of stimuli, which are challenging to identify. Questionnaires and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) testing are methods to identify potentially causative exposures.Objectives: To perform a systematic review to determine the usefulness of questionnaires and serum IgG testing in identifying exposures that may have caused HP.Methods: This systematic review informed an international, multidisciplinary panel that developed a clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis of HP for the American Thoracic Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from January 1946 to October 2019 for studies that used a questionnaire or serum IgG testing to identify exposures that may have caused HP. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to appraise the quality of the evidence.Results: Searches identified 1,141 and 926 potentially relevant articles for questionnaires and serum IgG testing, respectively. The full texts of 32 and 49 articles, respectively, were reviewed. Two observational studies for questionnaires and 15 accuracy studies for serum IgG testing were selected. Questionnaires were better at detecting potentially relevant exposures than clinical history (100% vs. 26%; risk ratio [RR], 3.80; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.79-8.06) and serum IgG testing (100% vs. 63%; RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.12-2.23) but did not differ from serum IgG testing plus bronchial challenge testing (59% vs. 65%; RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.65-1.24). Longer, detailed questionnaires were more likely to lead to identification of potential exposures. Only 70% of potential exposures identified by questionnaires were subsequently confirmed by environmental testing. Serum IgG testing distinguished HP from healthy exposed and unexposed control subjects with high sensitivity (90% and 92%, respectively) and high specificity (91% and 100%, respectively) but did not distinguish HP as effectively from interstitial lung diseases (ILDs; sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 68%).Conclusions: Using a questionnaire may help clinicians identify potentially relevant exposures when evaluating a patient with newly identified ILD for HP. Serum IgG testing may also lead to identification of potentially relevant exposures, but its usefulness for distinguishing HP from other types of ILD is poor.

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: real world diagnostic criteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Establishing a diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and distinguishing it from other forms of interstitial lung diseases represents a common challenge in clinical practice. This review summarizes the latest literature and guidelines on HP while integrating some real-life conundrums.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in the understanding of the pathobiology of fibrotic HP and other progressive pulmonary fibrosis have changed how we approach the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung disease. Classifications now embrace distinguishing two clinical phenotypes: nonfibrotic and fibrotic HP because of distinct disease behavior and prognosis implications. International guidelines on HP were recently published and proposed a framework and algorithm to guide the diagnostic process.

SUMMARY

The diagnosis of HP relies on the integration of multiples domains: clinical assessment of exposure, imaging, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis and histopathological findings. These features are reviewed in multidisciplinary discussion and lead to an estimation of the degree of confidence for HP diagnosis. Further research is warranted to improve knowledge on the pathophysiology of HP and ultimately improve its diagnostic approaches.

Spectrum of childhood interstitial and diffuse lung diseases at a tertiary hospital in Egypt

Background

Childhood interstitial and diffuse lung diseases (chILD) encompass a broad spectrum of rare pulmonary disorders. In most developing Middle Eastern countries, chILD is still underdiagnosed. Our objective was to describe and investigate patients diagnosed with chILD in a tertiary university hospital in Egypt.

Methods

We analysed data of consecutive subjects (aged <18 years) referred for further evaluation at the Children's Hospital, Ain Shams University (Cairo, Egypt). Diagnosis of chILD was made in accordance with the ChILD-EU criteria. The following information was obtained: demographic data, clinical characteristics, chest computed tomography findings, laboratory studies, spirometry, bronchoalveolar lavage and histopathology findings.

Results

22 subjects were enrolled over 24 months. Median age at diagnosis was 7 years (range 3.5–14 years). The most common manifestations were dyspnoea (100%), cough (90.9%), clubbing (95.5%) and tachypnoea (90.9%). Systematic evaluation led to the following diagnoses: hypersensitivity pneumonitis (n=3), idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (n=4), chILD related to chronic granulomatous disease (n=3), chILD related to small airways disease (n=3), post-infectious chILD (n=2), Langerhans cell histiocytosis (n=2), idiopathic pulmonary haemosiderosis (n=2), granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (n=1), systemic sclerosis (n=1) and familial interstitial lung disease (n=1). Among the subjects who completed the diagnostic evaluation (n=19), treatment was changed in 13 (68.4%) subjects.

Conclusion

Systematic evaluation and multidisciplinary peer review of chILD patients at our tertiary hospital led to changes in management in 68% of the patients. This study highlights the need for an Egyptian chILD network with genetic testing, as well as the value of collaborating with international groups in improving healthcare for children with chILD.

In Egypt, childhood interstitial and diffuse lung diseases (chILD) are still underdiagnosed. Establishment of an Egyptian chILD network with genetic testing is essential to improve healthcare for children diagnosed with chILD.https://bit.ly/385qKsU

Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this analysis is to provide evidence-based and consensus-derived guidance for clinicians to improve individual diagnostic decision-making for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and decrease diagnostic practice variability.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Approved panelists developed key questions regarding the diagnosis of HP using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) format. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion, and vetted evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract data, and to grade the level of evidence supporting each recommendation or statement. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Graded recommendations and ungraded consensus-based statements were drafted and voted on using a modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus. A diagnostic algorithm is provided, using supporting data from the recommendations where possible, along with expert consensus to help physicians gauge the probability of HP.

RESULTS

The systematic review of the literature based on 14 PICO questions resulted in 14 key action statements: 12 evidence-based, graded recommendations and 2 ungraded consensus-based statements. All evidence was of very low quality.

INTERPRETATION

Diagnosis of HP should employ a patient-centered approach and include a multidisciplinary assessment that incorporates the environmental and occupational exposure history and CT pattern to establish diagnostic confidence prior to considering BAL and/or lung biopsy. Criteria are presented to facilitate diagnosis of HP. Additional research is needed on the performance characteristics and generalizability of exposure assessment tools and traditional and new diagnostic tests in modifying clinical decision-making for HP, particularly among those with a provisional diagnosis.

Identification and Remediation of Environmental Exposures in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease: Evidence Review and Practical Considerations

A relationship between inhalational exposure to materials in the environment and development of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is long recognized. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is an environmentally -induced diffuse parenchymal lung disease. In addition to hypersensitivity pneumonitis, domestic and occupational exposures have been shown to influence onset and progression of other ILDs, including idiopathic interstitial pneumonias such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. A key component of the clinical evaluation of patients presenting with ILD includes elucidation of a complete exposure history, which may influence diagnostic classification of the ILD as well as its management. Currently, there is no standardized approach to environmental evaluation or remediation of potentially harmful exposures in home or workplace environments for patients with ILD. This review discusses evidence for environmental contributions to ILD pathogenesis and draws on asthma and occupational medicine literature to frame the potential utility of a professional evaluation for environmental factors contributing to the development and progression of ILD. Although several reports suggest benefits of environmental assessment for those with asthma or certain occupational exposures, lack of information about benefits in broader populations may limit application. Determining the feasibility, long-term outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of environmental evaluation and remediation in acute and chronic ILDs should be a focus of future research.

Exposure Assessment Tools for Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report

This report is based on proceedings from the Exposure Assessment Tools for Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (HP) Workshop, sponsored by the American Thoracic Society, that took place on May 18, 2019, in Dallas, Texas. The workshop was initiated by members from the Environmental, Occupational, and Population Health and Clinical Problems Assemblies of the American Thoracic Society. Participants included international experts from pulmonary medicine, occupational medicine, radiology, pathology, and exposure science. The meeting objectives were to 1) define currently available tools for exposure assessment in evaluation of HP, 2) describe the evidence base supporting the role for these exposure assessment tools in HP evaluation, 3) identify limitations and barriers to each tool's implementation in clinical practice, 4) determine which exposure assessment tools demonstrate the best performance characteristics and applicability, and 5) identify research needs for improving exposure assessment tools for HP. Specific discussion topics included history-taking and exposure questionnaires, antigen avoidance, environmental assessment, specific inhalational challenge, serum-specific IgG testing, skin testing, lymphocyte proliferation testing, and a multidisciplinary team approach. Priorities for research in this area were identified.

Assessment and Management of Occupational Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

The diagnosis and treatment of occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis (OHP) remain complex and challenging in the absence of diagnostic gold standards or clinical guidelines. This review provides an update of the recent literature regarding the different presentations of OHP and the diagnostic yield and value of the diagnostic tests currently available, which include occupational and medical history, laboratory tests (serum-specific immunoglobulins, environmental sampling), imaging, bronchoalveolar lavage, transbronchial biopsy, transbronchial cryobiopsy, surgical lung biopsy, and specific inhalation challenges. These tools provide a precise differential diagnosis within the framework of interstitial lung diseases. However, among the chronic fibrotic forms, distinguishing OHP from sarcoidosis, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis remains a diagnostic challenge. Avoidance of exposure is pivotal for OHP management, whereas corticosteroids are fundamental in the pharmacological approach to this disease. In addition, studies describing the long-term benefits of immunosuppressive and antifibrotic agents have increased the use of these treatments in OHP.

Occupation versus environmental factors in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: population attributable fraction

Background

Despite well-documented case series of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), epidemiological data delineating relative contributions of risk factors are sparse. To address this, we estimated HP risk in a case-referent study of occupational and nonoccupational exposures.

Methods

We recruited cases of HP by ICD-9 codes from an integrated healthcare delivery system (IHCDS) and a tertiary medical care centre. We drew referents, matched for age and sex, from the IHCDS. Participants underwent comprehensive, structured telephone interviews eliciting details of occupational and home environmental exposures. We employed a hierarchical analytic approach for data reduction based on the false discovery rate method within clusters of exposures. We measured lung function and selected biomarkers in a subset of participants. We used multivariate logistic regression to estimate exposure-associated odds ratios (ORs) and population attributable fractions (PAFs) for HP.

Results

We analysed data for 192 HP cases (148 IHCDS; 44 tertiary care) and 229 referents. Occupational exposures combined more than doubled the odds of developing HP (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.73–4.14) with a PAF of 34% (95% CI 21–46%); nonoccupational bird exposure also doubled the HP odds (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.13–3.60), with a PAF of 12% (3–21%). Lung function and selected biomarkers did not substantively modify the risk estimates on the basis of questionnaire data alone.

Discussion

In a case-referent approach evaluating HP risk, identifiable exposures accounted, on an epidemiological basis, for approximately two in three cases of disease; conversely, for one in three, the risk factors for disease remained elusive.

Occupational and environmental factors account for two in three cases of HP. The contributions of risk factors vary markedly depending on case referral source. This could affect clinical ascertainment of cause and the implementation of preventative actions.https://bit.ly/3feAa6P

Exposure assessment in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a comprehensive review and proposed screening questionnaire

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is an immune-mediated inflammatory lung disease characterised by the inhalation of environmental antigens leading to acute and chronic lung injury. Along with suggestive clinical and radiological findings, history and timing of suspected antigen exposure are important elements for diagnostic confidence. Unfortunately, many diagnoses remain tentative and based on vague and imprecise environmental or material exposure histories. To date, there has not been a comprehensive report highlighting the frequency and type of environmental exposure that might lead to or support a more systematic approach to antigen identification. We performed a comprehensive literature review to identify and classify causative antigens and their associated environmental contexts or source materials, with emphasis on the extent of the supportive literature for each exposure type. Eligible publications were those that reported unique inciting antigens and their respective environments or contexts. A clinical questionnaire was then proposed based on this review to better support diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis when antigen testing or other clinical and radiological variables are inconclusive or incomplete.

Familial hypersensitivity pneumonitis triggered by Cladosporium herbarum exposure during carpooling

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a respiratory disease caused by an inappropriate immune response to environmental antigens affecting the small airways and lung parenchyma. With an incidence of 0.3–1.94 cases per 100 000 per year [1, 2], HP is the third cause of interstitial lung disease (ILD) [3]. Seven to 17% of patients with HP report a positive family history for ILD [4, 5], suggesting predisposing genetic factors.

This series reports cases of Cladosporium herbarum-related HP due to an uncommon exposure source, illustrating the genetic background underlying HP, and highlighting the role of environmental home inquiry and serum precipitins in diagnosis and follow-uphttps://bit.ly/3hzvE4w

Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Adults. An Official ATS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline

Background: This guideline addresses the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). It represents a collaborative effort among the American Thoracic Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax.Methods: Systematic reviews were performed for six questions. The evidence was discussed, and then recommendations were formulated by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in the field of interstitial lung disease and HP using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.Results: The guideline committee defined HP, and clinical, radiographic, and pathological features were described. HP was classified into nonfibrotic and fibrotic phenotypes. There was limited evidence that was directly applicable to all questions. The need for a thorough history and a validated questionnaire to identify potential exposures was agreed on. Serum IgG testing against potential antigens associated with HP was suggested to identify potential exposures. For patients with nonfibrotic HP, a recommendation was made in favor of obtaining bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid for lymphocyte cellular analysis, and suggestions for transbronchial lung biopsy and surgical lung biopsy were also made. For patients with fibrotic HP, suggestions were made in favor of obtaining BAL for lymphocyte cellular analysis, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, and surgical lung biopsy. Diagnostic criteria were established, and a diagnostic algorithm was created by expert consensus. Knowledge gaps were identified as future research directions.Conclusions: The guideline committee developed a systematic approach to the diagnosis of HP. The approach should be reevaluated as new evidence accumulates.

Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Diagnosis and Management

Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a complex interstitial lung disease that is not entirely understood. In its chronic and fibrotic form, hypersensitivity pneumonitis is one of the main mimickers of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Distinguishing between these two conditions is challenging but is of particular clinical relevance. Two approved therapies are available for IPF, and a considerable number of clinical trials are now exploring newer pharmacological options. This impressive research effort is a consequence of new pathogenetic understanding, updated diagnostic criteria and a long history of pharmacological trials. Conversely, current knowledge gaps on pathogenesis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, coupled with lack of validated diagnostic criteria, make the management of this disease an unsolved clinical challenge. This also reflects the paucity of therapeutic clinical trials in this field. In this review, we describe the current evidence and the possible future options to approach this complex disease.

The Occupational Burden of Nonmalignant Respiratory Diseases. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Statement

Rationale: Workplace inhalational hazards remain common worldwide, even though they are ameliorable. Previous American Thoracic Society documents have assessed the contribution of workplace exposures to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on a population level, but not to other chronic respiratory diseases. The goal of this document is to report an in-depth literature review and data synthesis of the occupational contribution to the burden of the major nonmalignant respiratory diseases, including airway diseases; interstitial fibrosis; hypersensitivity pneumonitis; other noninfectious granulomatous lung diseases, including sarcoidosis; and selected respiratory infections. Methods: Relevant literature was identified for each respiratory condition. The occupational population attributable fraction (PAF) was estimated for those conditions for which there were sufficient population-based studies to allow pooled estimates. For the other conditions, the occupational burden of disease was estimated on the basis of attribution in case series, incidence rate ratios, or attributable fraction within an exposed group. Results: Workplace exposures contribute substantially to the burden of multiple chronic respiratory diseases, including asthma (PAF, 16%); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PAF, 14%); chronic bronchitis (PAF, 13%); idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (PAF, 26%); hypersensitivity pneumonitis (occupational burden, 19%); other granulomatous diseases, including sarcoidosis (occupational burden, 30%); pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (occupational burden, 29%); tuberculosis (occupational burden, 2.3% in silica-exposed workers and 1% in healthcare workers); and community-acquired pneumonia in working-age adults (PAF, 10%). Conclusions: Workplace exposures contribute to the burden of disease across a range of nonmalignant lung conditions in adults (in addition to the 100% burden for the classic occupational pneumoconioses). This burden has important clinical, research, and policy implications. There is a pressing need to improve clinical recognition and public health awareness of the contribution of occupational factors across a range of nonmalignant respiratory diseases.

Identifying causation in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a British perspective

Background

Establishing whether patients are exposed to a 'known cause' is a key element in both the diagnostic assessment and the subsequent management of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP).

Objective

This study surveyed British interstitial lung disease (ILD) specialists to document current practice and opinion in relation to establishing causation in HP.

Methods

British ILD consultants (pulmonologists) were invited by email to take part in a structured questionnaire survey, to provide estimates of demographic data relating to their service and to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements. A priori 'consensus agreement' was defined as at least 70% of participants replying that they 'Strongly agree' or 'Tend to agree'.

Results

54 consultants took part in the survey from 27 ILD multidisciplinary teams. Participants estimated that 20% of the patients in their ILD service have HP, and of these, a cause is identifiable in 32% of cases. For patients with confirmed HP, an estimated 40% have had a bronchoalveolar lavage for differential cell counts, and 10% a surgical biopsy. Consensus agreement was reached for 25 of 33 statements relating to causation and either the assessment of unexplained ILD or management of confirmed HP.

Conclusions

This survey has demonstrated that although there is a degree of variation in the diagnostic approach for patients with suspected HP in Britain, there is consensus opinion for some key areas of practice. There are several factors in clinical practice that currently act as potential barriers to identifying the cause for British HP patients.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Farmers: Improving Etiologic Diagnosis to Optimize Counselling

In a farmer, a diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) might cause drastic changes in life, and guidance concerning future prospects within farming requires a best possible etiological diagnosis. We aimed to assess (1) if immunological analyses based on material samples from the work environment could be used to improve the etiologic diagnosis in a farmer suffering from HP, and (2) if combining a longitudinal immunological investigation of workplace material with a realistic work place inhalation challenge could be used to optimize counselling with respect to further employment within farming. A realistic workplace inhalation challenge was performed to explore potential associations between exposure, symptoms and immune responses. Material samples were collected from various places on the farm, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to identify possible IgE and IgG antibodies in patient serum towards these material samples. Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblot were used to detect the specific proteins in the material samples that were recognized by ELISA. The patient's symptoms were reproduced by the workplace challenge, and more severe symptoms were associated with increased serum levels of specific IgG antibodies towards material samples from the workplace. The immunoblot detected IgG binding proteins in agreement with known allergens of the fungi Alternaria and Pullularia. Combining realistic workplace challenge with immunological analyses of workplace material may improve the basis for counselling farmers with farmer´s lung concerning future work within farming.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: Antigen diversity and disease implications

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immune-mediated syndrome triggered by inhalation of a wide variety of allergens, to which an individual has previously been sensitized. More than 200 agents responsible for the disease have already been identified; however, HP occurs only in a small number of individuals exposed to causal antigens. The present report provides an overview of the role of antigen role in HP, highlighting its diversity, research methods, and prevention strategies, as well as the impact on disease prognosis following elimination of antigen. HP is an underdiagnosed disease and, therefore, it is difficult to accurately estimate its incidence. Triggering antigens can be divided into six broad categories: bacteria, fungi, mycobacteria, animal and plant proteins, chemicals, and metals, represented by disease prototypes. The identification of causal antigen is a major challenge; it is impossible to obtain in about 30-60% of cases. The acute form of HP, with early detection and immediate eviction of causal antigen, tends to have an excellent prognosis. In the chronic form, partial recovery of disease is still possible; however, some cases tend to progress to fibrosis, even after removal from exposure. In conclusion, HP diagnosis should be based on a proactive search for potential antigen sources, although their identification is hampered by the lack of standardized methods of demonstrating the specific antigen sensitization. Antigen avoidance is a critical determinant in disease prognosis.

Identification of Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: An International Modified Delphi Survey

RATIONALE

Current diagnosis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP) involves considering a combination of clinical, radiological, and pathological information in multidisciplinary team discussions. However, this approach is highly variable with poor agreement between centers.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify diagnostic criteria for cHP that reach consensus among international experts.

METHODS

A 3-round modified Delphi survey was conducted between April and August 2017. Forty-five experts in interstitial lung disease from 14 countries participated in the online survey. Diagnostic items included in round 1 were generated using expert interviews and literature review. During rounds 1 and 2, experts rated the importance of each diagnostic item on a 5-point Likert scale. The a priori threshold of consensus was ≥ 75% of experts rating a diagnostic item as very important or important. In the third round, experts graded the items that met consensus as important and provided their level of diagnostic confidence for a series of clinical scenarios.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Consensus was achieved on 18 of the 40 diagnostic items. Among these, experts gave the highest level of importance to the identification of a causative antigen, time relation between exposure and disease, mosaic attenuation on chest imaging, and poorly formed non-necrotizing granulomas on pathology. In clinical scenarios, the diagnostic confidence of experts in cHP was heightened by the presence of these diagnostic items.

CONCLUSION

This consensus-based approach for the diagnosis of cHP represents a first step towards the development of international guidelines for the diagnosis of cHP.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive lung disease characterized by progressive lung scarring and the histological picture of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). It is associated with increasing cough and dyspnoea and impaired quality of life. IPF affects ∼3 million people worldwide, with incidence increasing dramatically with age. The diagnostic approach includes the exclusion of other interstitial lung diseases or overlapping conditions and depends on the identification of the UIP pattern, usually with high-resolution CT; lung biopsy might be required in some patients. The UIP pattern is predominantly bilateral, peripheral and with a basal distribution of reticular changes associated with traction bronchiectasis and clusters of subpleural cystic airspaces. The biological processes underlying IPF are thought to reflect an aberrant reparative response to repetitive alveolar epithelial injury in a genetically susceptible ageing individual, although many questions remain on how to define susceptibility. Substantial progress has been made in the understanding of the clinical management of IPF, with the availability of two pharmacotherapeutic agents, pirfenidone and nintedanib, that decrease physiological progression and likely improve progression-free survival. Current efforts are directed at identifying IPF early, potentially relying on combinations of biomarkers that include circulating factors, demographics and imaging data.

The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current and future approaches

With the recent development of two effective treatments for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, an accurate diagnosis is crucial. The traditional approach to diagnosis emphasises the importance of thorough clinical and laboratory evaluations to exclude secondary causes of disease. High-resolution CT is a critical initial diagnostic test and acts as a tool to identify patients who should undergo surgical lung biopsy to secure a definitive histological diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. This diagnostic approach faces several challenges. Many patients with suspected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis present with atypical high-resolution CT characteristics but are unfit for surgical lung biopsy, therefore preventing a confident diagnosis. The state of the art suggests an iterative, multidisciplinary process that incorporates available clinical, laboratory, imaging, and histological features. Recent research has explored genomic techniques to molecularly phenotype patients with interstitial lung disease. In the future, clinicians will probably use blood-specific or lung-specific molecular markers in combination with other clinical, physiological, and imaging features to enhance diagnostic efforts, refine prognostic recommendations, and influence the initial or subsequent treatment options. There is an urgent and increasing need for well designed, large, prospective studies measuring the effect of different diagnostic approaches. Ultimately, this will help to inform the development of guidelines and tailor clinical practice for the benefit of patients.

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HSP) is a common interstitial lung disease resulting from inhalation of a large variety of antigens by susceptible individuals. The disease is best classified as acute and chronic. Chronic HSP can be fibrosing or not. Fibrotic HSP has a large differential diagnosis and has a worse prognosis. The most common etiologies for HSP are reviewed. Diagnostic criteria are proposed for both chronic forms based on exposure, lung auscultation, lung function tests, HRCT findings, bronchoalveolar lavage, and biopsies. Treatment options are limited, but lung transplantation results in greater survival in comparison to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Randomized trials with new antifibrotic agents are necessary.