Pirfenidone for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A retrospective study

Treatment of acute exacerbation in interstitial lung disease secondary to autoimmune rheumatic diseases: More questions than answers

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). In the last years, an acute exacerbation (AE) - defined as an acute, clinically significant respiratory deterioration characterized by evidence of new widespread alveolar abnormality - has been reported to occur in virtually all ILD types, including ARD-ILD. The aim of this review is to describe the available and investigational treatments in patients affected by AE-ARD-ILD in light of the very low quality of evidence available. Currently, management consists of efforts to identify reversible triggers of respiratory decline, such as drugs effective in ARDs and infections, including opportunistic infections, together with supportive treatments. AE-ILD, AE-ARD-ILD and acute respiratory distress syndrome share histopathologically similar findings of diffuse alveolar damage in most cases. Identification of triggers and risk factors might contribute to early diagnosis and treatment of AE-ILD, before the alveolar damage becomes irreversible. In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, the role of steroids and immunosuppressants remains controversial. Also, many uncertainties characterize the management of AE-ARD-ILD because of the lack of evidence and of an unquestionable effective therapy. At this time, no effective evidence-based therapeutic strategies for AE-ARD-ILD are available. In clinical practice, AE-ARD-ILD is often empirically treated with high-dose systemic steroids and antibiotics, with or without immunosuppressive drugs. Randomized controlled trials are needed to better understand the efficacy of current and future drugs for the treatment of this clinical relevant condition.

Japanese guidelines for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 2023:Revised edition

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an interstitial lung disease with a poor prognosis and an unknown cause that generally progresses to pulmonary fibrosis and leads to irreversible tissue alteration. The "Guidelines for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 2017," specializing in the treatment of IPF for the first time in Japan and presenting evidence-based standard treatment methods suited to the state of affairs in Japan, was published in 2017, in line with the 2014 version of "Formulation procedure for Minds Clinical Practice Guidelines." Because new evidence had accumulated, we formulated the "Guidelines for the treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis 2023 (revised 2nd edition)." While keeping the revision consistent with the ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT IPF treatment guidelines, new clinical questions (CQs) on pulmonary hypertension were added to the chronic stage, in addition to acute exacerbation and comorbid lung cancer, which greatly affect the prognosis but are not described in the ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT IPF guidelines. Regarding the advanced stages, we additionally created expert consensus-based advice for palliative care and lung transplantation. The number of CQs increased from 17 in the first edition to 24. It is important that these guidelines be used not only by respiratory specialists but also by general practitioners, patients, and their families; therefore, we plan to revise them appropriately in line with ever-advancing medical progress.

Baseline Blood Levels of Mucin-1 Are Associated with Crucial On-Treatment Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Receiving Antifibrotic Pirfenidone

Mucin-1 is a multi-functional glycoprotein expressed by type II alveolocytes and may be detectable in the circulation following pulmonary fibrosis. The prognostic utility of baseline pre-treatment blood levels of mucin-1 in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) receiving antifibrotics has not yet been fully established. We retrospectively studied a cohort of patients (from two hospitals) with IPF who were receiving pirfenidone for >12 weeks. Baseline blood mucin-1 levels were measured via sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. We investigated the performance of mucin-1 levels in longitudinally predicting the risks of acute exacerbation of IPF (AE-IPF) and severe adverse outcomes (SAO), including lung transplantation and death. Seventy patients were included; 20 developed AE-IPF; and 31 had SAO during the follow-up period. Patients with baseline mucin-1 levels ≥2.5 ng/mL had enhanced risks of AE-IPF (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 14.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.26-46.49) and SAO within 2 years (aHR, 7.87; 95% CI, 2.86-21.70) and anytime during the follow-up (aHR, 4.68; 95% CI, 2.11-10.39). The risks increased across subgroups with increasing mucin-1 levels. Patients in the "mucin-1 ≥ 2.5" group also exhibited an accelerated decline in DLCO. This study supports baseline blood mucin-1 levels as a biomarker for IPF that predicts adverse outcomes during pirfenidone treatment.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, full version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - 2021 update. Full-length version

BACKGROUND

Since the latest 2017 French guidelines, knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has evolved considerably.

METHODS

Practical guidelines were drafted on the initiative of the Coordinating Reference Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, led by the French Language Pulmonology Society (SPLF), by a coordinating group, a writing group, and a review group, with the involvement of the entire OrphaLung network, pulmonologists practicing in various settings, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a health manager, and a patient association. The method followed the "Clinical Practice Guidelines" process of the French National Authority for Health (HAS), including an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After a literature review, 54 guidelines were formulated, improved, and then validated by the working groups. These guidelines addressed multiple aspects of the disease: epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT scans, lung biopsy indication and procedures, etiological workup, methods and indications for family screening and genetic testing, assessment of the functional impairment and prognosis, indication and use of antifibrotic agents, lung transplantation, management of symptoms, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are intended to guide the diagnosis and practical management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Acute exacerbation is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Although the real nature of it is still not clear and there is no proven effective therapy, progress has been made since the consensus definition and diagnostic criteria were proposed. The trial results of several new innovative therapies in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have suggested a potential for benefit in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, leading to double blind randomized clinical trials in this area. This article reviews the present knowledge on acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, focusing on the triggering factors and treatment.

Efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been defined as a distinctive type of chronic fibrotic disease, characterised by a progressive decline in lung function and a common histological pattern of interstitial pneumonia. To analyse the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in the treatment of IPF, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.

DESIGN

This is a meta-analysis study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients were diagnosed as IPF.

INTERVENTIONS

Use of pirfenidone.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

Progression-free survival (PFS), acute exacerbation and worsening of IPF and Impact on adverse events.

MEASURES

The inverse variance method for the random-effects model was used to summarise the dichotomous outcomes, risk ratios and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

A total of 9 randomised controlled trials with 1011 participants receiving pirfenidone and 912 controls receiving placebo were summarised. The pooled result suggested a statistically significant difference inall-cause mortality after pirfenidone use, with a summarised relative ratio of 0.51 (p<0.01). Longer PFS was observed in patients receiving pirfenidone compared with those who were given placebo (p<0.01). The IPF groups presented a high incidence of adverse events with a pooled relative ratio of 3.89 (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pirfenidone can provide survival benefit for patients with IPF. Pirfenidone treatment was also associated with a longer PFS, a lower incidence of acute exacerbation and worsening of IPF.

[Exacerbation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis]

Acute exacerbations (AE) are a life-threatening complication in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In-hospital mortality is high and the overall prognosis poor. The underlying causes of AE-IPF still remain unclear and there are no focused guidelines for its management. In most cases high-dose steroids combined with an antibiotic therapy are applied. Preventive and palliative measures are very important. Intensive research is necessary to improve management of AE-IPF.

Feasibility and Outcomes of a Standardized Management Protocol for Acute Exacerbation of Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite the high mortality of acute exacerbations of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD), there is minimal evidence to guide management decisions. We aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of a standardized management protocol for AE-ILD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with AE-ILD admitted to hospital between January 2015 and August 2019. Patients were managed with a standardized protocol including chest computed tomography (CT) at diagnosis, pulse corticosteroid treatment, and a follow-up CT 7 days after corticosteroid pulse. The association between idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) versus non-IPF diagnosis and transplant-free survival within 1-year of AE-ILD was assessed using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression survival analysis. Associations with CT chest improvement 7 days after corticosteroid pulse were secondarily assessed.

RESULTS

89 patients with AE-ILD were identified. 1-year transplant-free and overall survival were 20.2 and 51.7%, respectively. Protocol adherence to pulse corticosteroids was high (95.5%). A diagnosis of IPF was associated with higher risk of death or transplant at 1-year versus a non-IPF diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, 95% CI 1.19-4.17, p = 0.012]. There were no significant associations with 7-day CT improvement; however, CT improvement was associated with higher transplant-free survival (p = 0.02) and a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (χ² = 7.06, p = 0.01) on unadjusted analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

IPF is associated with a higher risk of death or transplant at 1-year as compared to a non-IPF diagnosis in patients with AE-ILD managed using a standardized protocol. Improvement on CT chest 7 days after corticosteroid pulse is associated with better survival.

Surgical treatment for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer: postoperative acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and outcomes

Postoperative exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia in patients with interstitial lung disease and lung cancer has emerged as a serious problem. Therefore, we need to determine the risk factors for the development of postoperative exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia in this population. There are several subtypes of interstitial lung disease, which may lead to confusion about the treatment of patients with interstitial lung disease and lung cancer. Among the idiopathic forms of interstitial lung disease, we focused on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and reviewed the surgical treatments used for patients with IPF and lung cancer.

Incidence of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in patients receiving antifibrotic agents: Real-world experience

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is a fatal event that can occur during the clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although data from clinical trials suggest that the antifibrotic agents pirfenidone and nintedanib might reduce the risk of AE-IPF, the incidence of AE-IPF in patients receiving antifibrotic agents in clinical settings is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of AE-IPF in patients receiving antifibrotic agents and compare AE-IPF frequency in patients receiving pirfenidone and nintedanib.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 199 patients with IPF who were started on pirfenidone or nintedanib at our institution during the period from 2009 through 2018. Baseline characteristics, incidence of AE-IPF, and outcome after AE-IPF onset were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the observation period, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidences of AE-IPF were 9.3 %, 22.1 %, and 25.0 %, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidence rates for AE-IPF in the pirfenidone group and nintedanib group were 5.1 % vs. 18.6 %, 20.4 % vs. 25.2 %, and 22.6 % vs. 29.6 %, respectively. AE-IPF incidence was significantly lower in patients treated with pirfenidone than in those treated with nintedanib (log rank test, P = 0.035). The 3-month survival rate after AE-IPF onset was 61.1 % in the pirfenidone group and 61.5 % in the nintedanib group; thus, outcomes after AE-IPF onset were similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The reduction in AE-IPF risk might be greater for pirfenidone than for nintedanib.

Antifibrotic Drugs for COVID-19: From Orphan Drugs to Blockbusters?

:

Antifibrotic agents are known to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The two antifibrotic agents approved and in usage are Pirfenidone and Nintedanib granted by the USFDA in 2014. They are both known to decrease inflammation in the lungs. The fact that COVID-19 has shown to cause inflammation and fibrosis in the lungs frames the theory of their usage in the treatment of the disease by reducing lung scaring and allowing faster discharge of patients with post-COVID complications. The need for them to change their status from orphans to blockbusters has not happened yet due to fewer data and less research available on them as well as various other economic and patient- related factors. Since COVID-19 is widespread and causes many complications of the lungs that are similar to what these two drugs treat. We believe that the status of these drugs could be changed due to an increase in demand for them.

Three cases of sequential treatment with nintedanib following pulsed-dose corticosteroids for acute exacerbation of interstitial lung diseases

We describe three cases of acute exacerbation of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) in which patients were treated with pulsed-doses of corticosteroids followed by nintedanib and maintenance doses of corticosteroids. All cases responded well to pulsed-dose corticosteroids. However, in conventional practice, corticosteroids can complicate adverse events, including opportunistic infections, diabetes, and osteoporosis. One of the cases reported here involved dermatomyositis-associated ILD with anti-EJ antibodies. Considering possible side effects of corticosteroids and the frequent recurrence of ILDs associated with anti-EJ antibodies, we decided to use nintedanib as a sequential treatment for acute exacerbation of ILDs. Nintedanib has just been approved for treatment of progressive fibrosing ILD, but to date, few reports of acute exacerbation of ILDs treated with nintedanib have been published. This case series may contribute to a more thorough discussion regarding the use and timing of nintedanib in treating acute exacerbation of ILDs.

Corticosteroid responsiveness in patients with acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease admitted to the emergency department

Interstitial lung disease (ILD), particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), has a poor prognosis. Corticosteroids are widely used in the treatment of acute exacerbation of ILD (AE-ILD). This study aimed to clarify the causes of AE-ILD, determine the efficacy of corticosteroids for treating AE-ILD, and detect differences in the mortality rate among subgroups of ILD. This was an observational retrospective single-center study. Patients with ILD who presented to the emergency department with acute respiratory symptoms from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018, were included. Patients with AE-ILD were classified into two groups depending on the prednisolone dose: low dose (0 to 1.0 mg/kg) or high dose (> 1.0 mg/kg). Mortality rates between patients with and without IPF were compared. This study included 182 patients with AE-ILD, including IPF (n = 117) and non-IPF (n = 65). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that corticosteroid dose (HR: 0.221, CI: 0.102–0.408, P < 0.001), initial P/F ratio (HR:0.995, CI:0.992–0.999, P = 0.006), and mechanical ventilation within 3 days of hospitalization (HR:4.205, CI:2.059–8.589, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for mortality in patients with AE-ILD. This study showed that outcomes improve with higher doses of corticosteroids (> 1 mg/kg prednisolone) in patients with AE-non-IPF-ILD. However, this was not the case in patients with AE-IPF.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

To clarify prognostic factors of acute exacerbation (AE) of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase and Science Citation Index Expanded were searched from 2002 through 1 March 2019.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

The review included primary studies addressing the association between the outcomes such as all-cause mortality of AE of IPF and its potential prognostic factors, which were designated as any clinical information related to the outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers extracted relevant data independently and assessed risk of bias. Univariate results were pooled using a random-effect model if at least three studies were available. Prognostic factors were determined based on significant and consistent results on both univariate and multivariate analyses in the majority of studies.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 6763 articles retrieved, 37 were eligible and 31 potential prognostic factors for all-cause mortality were selected. Each study was subject to certain methodological shortcomings. The following five factors were statistically significant by a meta-analysis of univariate results, which was confirmed by multivariate analysis, that is, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (HR 1.10, 1.01 to 1.19), partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂) ratio (ORs 0.99 in two studies and HRs 0.31 and 0.99 in two studies, respectively), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (HRs 1.002, 1.003, 1.01 and 1.02), white blood cell (WBC) count (OR 1.38, 1.04 to 1.83) and oxygen therapy before AE (HRs 3.68, 1.05 to 12.9 and 2.34, 1.04 to 5.28) (multivariate analysis, 95% CI).

CONCLUSIONS

APACHE II score, PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, LDH, WBC count and oxygen therapy before AE were deemed as prognostic factors of AE of IPF. Although there are some methodological limitations in this study, these findings are reliable due to consistent results by both univariate and multivariate analyses.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018106172.

Updated Evaluation of the Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic fibrotic disease characterized by a progressive decline in lung function with a median survival of 3–5 years after diagnosis. The course of disease is highly variable and unpredictable, often punctuated by episodes of acute respiratory failure, known as acute exacerbations. The incidence of IPF is on the rise due to the aging population, as age is the most important risk factor for this disease. Pirfenidone and nintedanib are the two anti-fibrotic drugs approved for IPF which have shown reduction in lung function decline. This review will discuss the efficacy, safety and tolerability profile of pirfenidone from clinical trials and the real-world clinical experience. Pirfenidone reduces the decline in lung function and improves progression-free survival in patients with IPF. It is generally well tolerated with the most common side effects being gastrointestinal and phototoxicity.

[Treatment of complications and nonpharmacological management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis]

Komplikationen der idiopathischen pulmonalen Fibrose (IPF) sind für einen relevanten Mortalitätsanteil verantwortlich. Als wichtigstes Beispiel ist diesbezüglich die akute Exazerbation anzuführen, deren Krankenhausletalität über 50 % beträgt bei einem mittleren Überleben von nur wenigen Monaten. Somit kommt der Betrachtung von Komplikationen eine große Bedeutung für Krankheitsverständnis sowie Therapieplanung zu. Des Weiteren ist in den letzten Jahren die Evidenz für pneumologische Rehabilitation bei IPF deutlich gestiegen und wird von der Amerikanischen und Europäischen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie (American Thoracic Society [ATS]/European Respiratory Society [ERS]) zur Verbesserung der körperlichen Leistungsfähigkeit, Lebensqualität und der Symptome empfohlen.

Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF): an overview of current and future therapeutic strategies

Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the most common of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, is a disease with a poor prognosis, and a highly heterogeneous and unpredictable clinical course. While most patients experience a relatively slow clinical, functional and radiological deterioration, a significant minority develops episodes of acute respiratory worsening termed acute exacerbations of IPF (AE-IPF). AE-IPF cannot be predicted or prevented and precede approximately half of IPF-related deaths. An international working group has recently proposed new diagnostic criteria and definition of AE-IPF.Areas covered: Despite their clinical significance, the optimal treatment of AE-IPF remains undetermined. In this review, we discuss the huge unmet need for an improved understanding of AE-IPF, with emphasis on current and potential therapeutic strategies.Expert opinion: The recently revised definition and diagnostic criteria of AE-IPF will facilitate future research into the etiology, pathobiology and clinical management of these life-threatening events. Efforts should be made to identify patients at higher risk for AE-IPF and detect early signs of these events. Potential treatment options should be studied in randomized, controlled trials. To this end, the importance of international collaborations cannot be overemphasized.

Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: who to treat, how to treat

Purpose of Review

Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) are the most frequent cause of death among patients with IPF. Here, we review the revised definition and diagnostic criteria for AE-IPF and discuss management strategies including mechanistically targeted investigational therapies for this complex syndrome.

Recent Findings

Novel therapies targeting various pathways including inflammation, autoimmunity and coagulation cascade involved in AE-IPF have recently been reported. Although most of these reports are small and uncontrolled, they have provided evidence to design larger randomized, controlled, multicenter studies to improve outcomes among patients with AE-IPF.

Summary

AE-IPF has a dismal prognosis and current treatment consists mainly of supportive care and symptom palliation. There is a lack of consensus on current therapies for AE-IPF, including corticosteroids, but current randomized control studies for newer therapeutic strategies may hold promise.

Possible Serological Markers to Predict Mortality in Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Background and objectives: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has a particularly poor prognosis, and most IPF-related deaths are due to acute exacerbation (AE) of this condition. Few reports about biomarkers to predict prognosis of AE-IPF have been published since the release of the new AE-IPF criteria in 2016. The present study investigated relationships between serological markers and in-hospital mortality after the onset of AE-IPF. Methods: Demographic, serological, and imaging data from patients hospitalized at the Maebashi Red Cross Hospital (Gunma, Japan) between 1 January 2013, and 31 December 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. Subjects fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for AE-IPF were divided into those who survived or died; statistical analysis of risk factors was performed using data from these two groups. Results: Diagnostic criteria for AE-IPF were fulfilled by 84 patients (59 males (70.2%)), with a median age of 78 years (range, 56-95 years). IPF was diagnosed before hospitalization in 50 (59.5%) patients and 38 (45.2%) died in hospital. Among the serological markers at hospitalization in the deceased group, C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly higher than in the survivor group (p = 0.002), while total serum protein (p = 0.031), albumin (p = 0.047) and total cholesterol (p = 0.039) were significantly lower. Cox hazard analysis of factors predicting mortality, corrected for age, sex and BMI, revealed the following: CRP (hazard ratio (HR) 1.080 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.022-1.141); p = 0.006), LDH (HR 1.003 (95% CI 1.000-1.006); p = 0.037), and total cholesterol (HR 0.985 (95% CI 0.972-0.997); p = 0.018). Conclusions: Our data suggest that CRP, LDH, and total cholesterol may be biomarkers predicting mortality in patients with AE-IPF. However, only prospective controlled studies can confirm or not our observation as a generalizable one.

Pharmacological treatment of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective study of 88 patients

Background

Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) is often fatal. Although pharmacological treatments have been studied, outcomes remain poor. This study evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for AE-IPF.

Methods

This retrospective study comprised 88 patients who received a diagnosis of AE-IPF and were admitted to our center during the period from January 2008 through April 2017. We reviewed the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of the 88 patients. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify variables that were significant predictors of 3-month death.

Results

Data from 88 AE-IPF patients (age range, 56-81 years) were analyzed. In all patients, corticosteroid (CS) pulse therapy was performed an average of 1.7 times, and the initial CS maintenance dose was 1 mg/kg for 65 patients and 0.5 mg/kg for 23 patients. The combination treatments received were sivelestat in 83 patients (94%), recombinant human thrombomodulin (rhTM) in 45 patients (51%), pirfenidone in 41 patients (47%), and cyclosporine in 71 patients (81%). Univariate analysis showed that use of rhTM, and an initial CS maintenance dose of 0.5 mg/kg were associated with better 3-month survival. In multivariate analysis, both use of rhTM and an initial CS maintenance dose of 0.5 mg/kg were associated with better 3-month survival. Other treatments, including sivelestat, cyclosporine, pirfenidone, and polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column-direct hemoperfusion, were not associated with better 3-month survival.

Conclusion

Addition of rhTM to CS, and a low initial CS maintenance dose (0.5 mg/kg), were associated with better 3-month survival in patients with AE-IPF.

Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is often seen in elderly men who smoke. A diagnosis of IPF is based on a combination of a detailed clinical history, specific physical examination, laboratory findings, pulmonary function tests, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest, and histopathology. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has a heterogeneous clinical course, from an asymptomatic stable state to progressive respiratory failure or acute exacerbation (AE). Acute exacerbation of IPF has several important differential diagnoses, such as heart failure and volume overload. The International Working Group project proposed new criteria for defining AE of IPF in 2016, which divides it into triggered and idiopathic AE. On the basis of these criteria, physicians can detect AE of IPF more easily. The recent international IPF guidelines emphasized the utility of chest HRCT. In addition, two antifibrotic agents have become available. We should focus on both the management and prevention of AE. The diagnostic process, laboratory findings, typical chest imaging, management, and prognosis of AE are comprehensively reviewed in this article.

Recombinant thrombomodulin for acute exacerbation in idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Acute exacerbation (AE) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) is a poor prognostic event despite conventional therapy with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) for AE-IIP.

METHODS

For this prospective single-arm open-label multicentre cohort study, we retrospectively registered 61 cases of AE-IIP treated with conventional therapy between 2011 and 2013 (control arm), and prospectively enrolled 39 cases of AE-IIP treated with conventional therapy and rhTM (380 U/kg/day for 6 days) between 2014 and 2016 (rhTM arm). To reduce potential confounding in treatment comparisons, an adjusted mortality analysis for 90-day survival was conducted with weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Weights were derived from propensity scores estimated using a multivariable logistic regression analysis including potential confounders.

RESULTS

The 90-day survival rates of AE-IIP patients treated with/without rhTM were 66.7% (26/39) and 47.5% (29/61), respectively. After adjusting for imbalances, rhTM therapy was significantly associated with reduced mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.453; 95% CI: 0.237-0.864; P = 0.0163). The frequencies of adverse events with/without rhTM were 17.9% (7/39) and 19.7% (12/61), which were similar in both arms (P = 1.0). Two bleeding-related adverse events occurred in the rhTM arm.

CONCLUSION

Safety and efficacy were observed for rhTM treatment of AE-IIP. A future randomized controlled trial is required to draw final conclusions.

Efficacy of corticosteroid and intravenous cyclophosphamide in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Acute exacerbation (AE) is a leading cause of death in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although optimal treatment for AE-IPF remains unclear, high-dose corticosteroids (CS) with/without immunosuppressants, including intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY), are often used as empirical therapy. However, the survival benefit of adding IVCY to CS therapy is unknown. We investigated the efficacy of this therapy in patients with AE-IPF.

METHODS

Overall, 102 consecutive patients with IPF with a first idiopathic AE were included. Post-AE survival rates and treatment safety were retrospectively assessed. Efficacy of CS + IVCY therapy for the first AE was compared with that of CS monotherapy using a propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

The post-AE 90-day survival rate of the entire cohort was 64.7%. On the basis of the propensity scores, 26 matched patient pairs were made. Characteristics of matched patients with AE-IPF treated with CS (matched CS group) and those with CS + IVCY (matched CS + IVCY group) were well balanced. No significant between-group differences were observed in post-AE 90-day survival rates (84.6% vs 76.9%; P = 0.70), cumulative survival rates (P = 0.57 by log-rank test) or incidence of adverse events ≥ CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v5.0 grade 3 (61.5% vs 65.4%; P = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

The propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated that compared with CS monotherapy, CS + IVCY therapy did not significantly improve post-AE survival in patients with AE-IPF. Further studies are warranted to assess the efficacy of CS + IVCY therapy for AE-IPF.

Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis triggered by Aspergillus empyema

Acute exacerbation (AE) is a severe and life-threatening complication of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In 2016, the definition and diagnostic criteria for AE-IPF were updated by an international working group. The new definition includes any acute, clinically significant respiratory deterioration (both idiopathic and triggered events) characterized by evidence of new widespread alveolar abnormality in patients with IPF. There are no currently proven beneficial management strategies for idiopathic and triggered AE-IPF. This is the first report describing AE-IPF triggered by Aspergillus empyema, which was improved by a combination of corticosteroid, systemic antifungal therapy, local antifungal therapy, and additional pharmacological therapies. Future research may reveal optimal strategies for both idiopathic and triggered AE-IPF.