Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease and outcomes after hospitalization: A cohort study

Hospitalization Rates in Interstitial Lung Disease: An Analysis of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Registry

Rationale: Little is known about hospitalization in other types of interstitial lung disease (ILD) besides idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Objectives: To determine the frequency of hospitalizations in various types of ILD and elucidate the association of hospitalization with outcomes. Methods: An analysis of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry data was performed. Inpatient hospitalization rates and survival posthospitalization were compared for various types of ILD. Measurements and Main Results: Hospitalization rates were similar across ILD types: 40.6% of participants with IPF, 42.8% of participants with connective tissue disease-related ILD (CTD-ILD), 44.9% of participants with non-IPF idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), 46.5% of participants with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP), and 53.3% of participants with "other" ILD. All-cause hospitalization was not associated with decreased transplant-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98, 1.46; P = 0.0759) after adjusting for comorbidities and severity of illness; however, respiratory-related hospitalization was (AHR, 1.53; 95% CI = 1.23, 1.90; P = 0.0001). Participants with CTD-ILD (HR, 0.43; 95% CI = 0.25, 0.75; P = 0.0031) and non-IPF IIP (HR, 0.3; 95% CI = 0.15, 0.58; P = 0.005) had a lower risk of death posthospitalization compared with those with IPF, whereas those with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HR, 0.67; 95% CI = 0.37, 1.20; P = 0.1747) or other ILD (HR, 0.54; 95% CI = 0.19, 1.54; P = 0.25) had a risk comparable with that for IPF. Conclusions: Rates of hospitalization are similar across ILD subtypes. The risk of death or transplant after posthospitalization is lower in patients with CTD-ILD and non-IPF IIP, compared with patients with IPF. In a mixed population of participants with ILD, all-cause hospitalizations were not associated with decreased transplant-free survival; however respiratory-related hospitalizations were.

Lung adenocarcinoma discovered during the follow-up of lung-dominant connective tissue disease: a case report and literature review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) can lead to lung cancer, which brings great challenges to differential diagnosis and comprehensive treatment. However, the clinical features of lung-dominant connective tissue disease (LD-CTD) related ILD combined with lung cancer has not been validated. We report the case of an 80-year-old woman with LD-CTD treated regularly with nintedanib who presented progressive dyspnoea and hypoxemia after recurrent viral infections. Her chest computed tomography (CT) showed aggravated interstitial fibrosis in both lower lungs with moderate right pleural effusion. Clinicians should be alert to lung cancer in patients who are experiencing poor responsiveness to treatment or acute progression of ILD. The available literatures about the differential diagnosis of clinical manifestations, imaging, treatment and prognosis of LD-CTD are reviewed and discussed in this study.

The impact of hospitalization on mortality in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: a medical records review study

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with Connective Tissue Diseases (CTD). This study evaluated the impact of hospitalization on mortality in an ethnically and racially diverse cohort of CTD-ILD patients.

METHODS

We conducted a medical records review study at Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY. We included 96 patients and collected data on demographic characteristics, reasons for hospitalization, length of stay, immunosuppressant therapy use, and mortality. We stratified our patients into two cohorts: hospitalized and non-hospitalized. The hospitalized cohort was further subdivided into cardiopulmonary and non-cardiopulmonary admissions. Two-sample tests or Wilcoxon's rank sum tests for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables were used for analyses as deemed appropriate.

RESULTS

We identified 213 patients with CTD-ILD. Out of them, 96 patients met the study's inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were females (79%), and self-identified as Hispanic (54%) and Black (40%). The most common CTDs were rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (29%), inflammatory myositis (22%), and systemic sclerosis (15%). The majority (76%) of patients required at least one hospitalization. In the non-hospitalized group, no deaths were observed, however we noted significant increase of mortality risk in hospitalized group (p = 0.02). We also observed that prolonged hospital stay (> 7 days) as well as older age and male sex were associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged (> 7 days) hospital stay and hospitalization for cardiopulmonary causes, as well as older age and male sex were associated with an increased mortality risk in our cohort of CTD-ILD patients.

Lung Transplantation: A Viable Option for Connective Tissue Disease?

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) caused by connective tissue disease (CTD) are one of the main causes of morbidity and death in patients. Although the International Society for Heart & Lung Transplant suggested that ILD and PH related to CTD are rare indications for lung transplantation in 2006, many lung transplantation centers are concerned that the multisystem involvement of CTD will affect survival outcomes after lung transplantation, and CTD is regarded as a relative contraindication for lung transplantation. However, long-term and short-term survival after lung transplantation in CTD patients is similar compared with survival in common indications for lung transplantation such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and no higher incidence of complications after transplantation in many lung transplant centers. This suggests that lung transplantation may be beneficial in CTD patients with disease that progresses to end-stage lung disease, and CTD should not be considered a contraindication for lung transplantation. In the future, more prospective studies are needed to analyze the risk factors of lung transplantation in CTD patients to improve survival rates and reduce the risk of complications. This narrative review summarizes the selection and evaluation of candidates for CTD before lung transplantation and describes the clinical outcomes in CTD after lung transplantation in large-capacity lung transplantation center. The purpose of this review is to help rheumatologists decide when to refer patients with CTD-related lung involvement to a lung transplantation center and the conditions to consider before transplantation and to provide confidence to lung transplant experts.

The Lung Transplant Candidate, Indications, Timing, and Selection Criteria

Lung transplantation can be lifesaving for patients with advanced lung disease. Demographics are evolving with recipients now sicker but determining candidacy remains predicated on one's underlying lung disease prognosis, along with the likelihood of posttransplant success. Determining optimal timing can be challenging, and most programs favor initiating the process early and proactively to allow time for patient education, informed decision-making, and preparation. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation is used to elucidate disease progrnosis and identify risk factors for poor posttransplant outcomes. Candidacy criteria vary significantly by center, and close communication between referring and transplant providers is necessary to improve access to transplant and outcomes.

Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in 161 Patients: A Retrospective Study

Objective

This study was conducted to retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics of CTD-ILD patients to provide strategies for clinical management.

Methods

This study collected and analyzed the clinical data and relevant examination results of 161 patients diagnosed with CTD-ILD between 01 January 2018 and 01 January 2021.

Results

A total of 161 CTD-ILD patients, 74.53% were females and 25.47% were males, 32.92% were elderly and 67.08% were non-elderly. The main clinical symptoms of CTD-ILD patients were cough (44.72%), decreased activity tolerance (40.37%). RA-ILD was the most common one in the non-elderly and the elderly CTD-ILD patients (48.15% and 50.94%, respectively). Compared with non-elderly, elderly patients with CTD-ILD had a longer duration of CTD (p=0.04). However, fatigue (p=0.005), activity tolerance (p=0.029), the incidence of pulmonary diffusion dysfunction (p=0.047), and systemic immunoinflammatory index (SII, p=0.014) (platelet × NLR) were all decreased. The standard deviation of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) (p=0.024) and immunoglobulin (IgA) (p=0.033) was significantly increased. The smoking index was significantly higher in men than in women with CTD-ILD (p=0.000), but symptoms of reduced activity tolerance were less pronounced than in women (p<0.05). Elderly CTD-ILD patients (p=0.003) and women from non-elderly patients were prone to lower hemoglobin (p=0.000). Among the elderly, the lymphocyte ratio was more significantly elevated in female CTD-ILD patients than in males (p=0.018). In contrast, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and SII were lower in female (p=0.038) than in male CTD-ILD patients (p=0.043).

Conclusion

CTD-ILD mainly affects non-elderly and women. Age may not be involved with decreased activity tolerance and increased lung function impairment in CTD-ILD patients. However, the elderly patients with CTD-ILD, especially the elderly female patients with low inflammation levels and high immune disorders, have a poor prognosis.

Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

Tens of thousands of patients with advanced lung diseases may be eligible to be considered as potential candidates for lung transplant around the world each year. The timing of referral, evaluation, determination of candidacy, and listing of candidates continues to pose challenges and even ethical dilemmas. To address these challenges, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation appointed an international group of members to review the literature, to consider recent advances in the management of advanced lung diseases, and to update prior consensus documents on the selection of lung transplant candidates. The purpose of this updated consensus document is to assist providers throughout the world who are caring for patients with pulmonary disease to identify potential candidates for lung transplant, to optimize the timing of the referral of these patients to lung transplant centers, and to provide transplant centers with a framework for evaluating and selecting candidates. In addition to addressing general considerations and providing disease specific recommendations for referral and listing, this updated consensus document includes an ethical framework, a recognition of the variability in acceptance of risk between transplant centers, and establishes a system to account for how a combination of risk factors may be taken into consideration in candidate selection for lung transplantation.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease

Lung transplantation (LTx) can be a life-extending treatment option for patients with advanced and/or progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis and connective tissue disease-associated ILD. IPF is now the most common indication for LTx worldwide. Several unique features in patients with ILD can impact optimal timing of referral or listing for LTx, pre- or post-transplant risks, candidacy and post-transplant management. As the epidemiology of LTx and community practices have evolved, recent literature describes outcomes and approaches in higher-risk candidates. In this review, we discuss the unique and important clinical findings, course, monitoring and management of patients with IPF and other progressive fibrotic ILDs during pre-LTx evaluation and up to the day of transplantation; the need for co-management with clinical experts in ILD and LTx is emphasised. Some post-LTx complications are unique in these patient cohorts, which require prompt detection and appropriate management by experts in multiple disciplines familiar with telomere biology disorders and infectious, haematological, oncological and cardiac complications to enhance the likelihood of improved outcomes and survival of LTx recipients with IPF and other ILDs.

Lung transplantation: candidate selection and timing of transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past two decades, lung transplant has become the mainstay of treatment for several end-stage lung diseases. As the field continues to evolve, the criteria for referral and listing have also changed. The last update to these guidelines was in 2014 and several studies since then have changed how patients are transplanted. Our article aims to briefly discuss these updates in lung transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article discusses the importance of early referral of patients for lung transplantation and the concept of the 'transplant window'. We review the referral and listing criteria for some common pulmonary diseases and also cite the updated literature surrounding the absolute and relative contraindications keeping in mind that they are a constantly moving target. Frailty and psychosocial barriers are difficult to assess with the current assessment tools but continue to impact posttransplant outcomes. Finally, we discuss the limited data on transplantation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID19 as well as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge to transplantation.

SUMMARY

The findings discussed in this article will strongly impact, if not already, how we select candidates for lung transplantation. It also addresses some aspects of lung transplant such as frailty and ARDS, which need better assessment tools and clinical data.

Survival and outcomes after lung transplantation for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases

Background

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the most important treatment for end-stage lung diseases. However, the treatment of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILD) using LTx is still controversial especially for polymyositis/dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease (PM/DM-ILD).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n=180) and CTD-ILD (n= 36) from 1^st January 2015 to 31^st December 2019 were recruited into the study. We set polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) as a single subgroup, and all the patients underwent LTx at the Wuxi People’s Hospital.

Results

We found that patients with non-myositis connective tissue-related ILD (NM-CTLD) were younger (p=0.007) and had a higher percentage of females (p=0.000) than patients with IPF. PM/DM-ILD was associated with a higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) (p=0.006) and a longer time in the intensive care unit (ICU) (p=0.000). The cumulative survival rates of patients with PM/DM-ILD were significantly lower than those with IPF (log rank, p=0.003). However, there were no significant differences when compared with the cumulative survival rates of patients with NM-CTLD and IPF (log rank, p=0.528). Age- and gender-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses indicated that post-LTx PGD (HR 1.498, 95% CI 1.227–1.828, p=0.000) and duration of ICU (HR 1.027, 95% CI 1.007–1.047, p=0.000) were the independent contributors of disease status to survival. Lung infection was the leading cause of post-LTx death in the groups, where the incidence was 65.3% (47/72) in IPF, 66.7% (8/12) in NM-CTLD, and 66.7% (4/6) in PM/DM-ILD.

Conclusions

This study found that patients with NM-CTLD had a similar survival outcome with IPF. However, patients with PM/DM-ILD-performed LTx had a lower survival rate than those with IPF.

Key Points • Previous studies have shown that the myopathies associated ILD patients had similar post-LTx outcomes with IPF patients. However, our retrospective analysis indicated that patients with PM/DM-ILD-performed LTx had a lower survival rate than those with IPF. • Patients with NM-CTLD had a similar survival outcome with IPF. • We also found that PM/DM-ILD was associated with a higher incidence of PGD and a longer time in the ICU.

Causes of acute respiratory hospitalizations predict survival in fibrosing interstitial lung diseases

Acute exacerbation of ILD (AE-ILD) is a common reason for hospitalization; it is also associated with significant mortality. Less is known about the prognostic significance of other events causing acute, non-elective hospitalizations in ILD patients. ILD patients hospitalized due to acute respiratory worsening were collected from medical records. Reasons for respiratory deterioration were classified into AE-ILDs and other causes. Clinical features and survival data of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other types of ILDs were evaluated and compared. In all, 237 patients (138 with IPF and 99 with other ILD) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of the non-IPF ILD types, the most prevalent subgroups were connective tissue disease-associated ILD (n = 33) and asbestosis (n = 22). The most common cause for hospitalization was AE-ILD explaining 41% of hospitalizations. Lower respiratory tract infection (22%), subacute progression of ILD (12%) and cardiovascular causes (7.2%) were other common reasons for hospital treatment. Patients with a lower respiratory tract infection had a more favorable prognosis compared with patients with AE-ILD. AE-ILDs were less fatal than cardiovascular or concurrent non-ILD-related causes for hospitalizations in non-IPF patients. High Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) index was a marker for shortened survival and earlier AE-ILDs in all patients. IPF patients had a significantly shorter overall and post-hospitalization survival time compared with other ILDs. Most respiratory hospitalizations in ILD patients were related to causes other than AE-ILD, which highlights the importance of accurate differential diagnosis in order to target the appropriate treatment for each ILD patient.

Usefulness of digital velcro crackles detection in identification of interstitial lung disease in patients with connective tissue diseases

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the VECTOR software in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs), compared with the reference standard of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).

Patients and methods

The study included 98 consecutive patients of CTD (24 males, 74 females; median age 66 years; range, 24 to 85 years) with a recent HRCT. Patients were evaluated in a blindly manner by VECTOR and the results obtained by the algorithm were compared with the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) according to HRCT.

Results

Interstitial lung disease was detected in 42.8% of subjects. VECTOR correctly classified 81/98 patients, with a diagnostic accuracy of 82.6%; sensitivity and specificity were 88.1% and 78.6%, respectively. Only 5/42 patients with ILD were not correctly classified by VECTOR, while false positive cases were 21.4%. No significant differences were observed according to the radiologic pattern of ILD.

Conclusion

VECTOR showed high sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy, allowing selecting patients to be investigated with HRCT. The relatively high frequency rate of false positive results is acceptable if compared with the lack of effective screening methods for this complication of CTDs.