Exploring the perspectives on medication self-management among persons with spinal cord injury/dysfunction and providers

Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury: Matched cohort analysis comparing drug classes, medical complications, and healthcare utilization metrics with 24-month follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury (SCI) is common and predisposes patients to increased risk of adverse events. Evaluation of long-term health consequences and economic burden of polypharmacy in patients with SCI is explored.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

METHODS

The IBM Marketscan Research Databases claims-based dataset was queried to search for adult patients with SCI with a 2-year follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS

Two matched cohorts were analyzed: those with and without polypharmacy, analyzing index hospitalization, readmissions, payments, and health outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 11 569 individuals with SCI were included, of which 7235 (63%) were in the polypharmacy group who took a median of 11 separate drugs over two years. Opioid analgesics were the most common medication, present in 57% of patients with SCI meeting the criteria of polypharmacy, followed by antidepressant medications (46%) and muscle relaxants (40%). Risk of pneumonia was increased for the polypharmacy group (58%) compared to the non-polypharmacy group (45%), as were urinary tract infection (79% versus 63%), wound infection (30% versus 21%), depression (76% versus 57%), and adverse drug events (24% versus 15%) at 2 years. Combined median healthcare payments were higher in polypharmacy at 2 years ($44 333 vs. $10 937, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Majority of individuals with SCI met the criteria for polypharmacy with nearly 60% of those prescribed opioids and taking drugs from high-risk side effect profiles. Polypharmacy in SCI was associated with a greater risk of pneumonia, depression, urinary tract infections, adverse drug events, and emergency room visits over two years with four times higher overall healthcare payments at 1-year post-injury.

Self-Management Embedded in Daily Activities: A Photoelicitation Focus Group Study among Persons with Spinal Cord Injury and Their Primary Caregivers in Bangladesh

Purpose

This study explored how community-dwelling persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their primary caregivers execute self-management strategies in daily activities. These strategies were mapped to a preexisting self-management framework.

Methods

Photoelicitation focus group discussions were conducted among 14 adults with SCI and their primary caregivers (in two groups). Moreover, a constant comparative framework was used to analyze the data.

Results

This study identified nine groups of self-management strategies, some of which could not be categorized under the three main self-management components generally accepted in the literature. Accordingly, a new component is proposed based off of this analysis, entitled management of social complexities, which includes crucial strategies such as (1) relocating to another environment, (2) behaving in an assertive manner, and (3) advocating for social change.

Conclusion

The results show that self-management, traditionally described as medical, emotional, and role management, should also include the management of social complexities. The identified strategies could be considered in the development of self-management enhancement programs in lower-middle-income countries.

User-Centered Design to Enhance mHealth Systems for Individuals With Dexterity Impairments: Accessibility and Usability Study

Background

Mobile health systems have been shown to be useful in supporting self-management by promoting adherence to schedules and longitudinal health interventions, especially in people with disabilities. The Interactive Mobile Health and Rehabilitation (iMHere) system was developed to empower people with disabilities and those with chronic conditions with supports needed for self-management and independent living. Since the first iteration of the iMHere 1.0 app, several studies have evaluated the accessibility and usability of the system. Potential opportunities to improve and simplify the user interface were identified, and the iMHere modules were redesigned accordingly.

Objective

In this study, we aim to evaluate the usability of the redesigned modules within the iMHere 1.0 app.

Methods

We evaluated the original and redesigned iMHere modules—MyMeds and SkinCare. The Purdue Pegboard Test was administered to assess the participants’ dexterity levels. Participants were then asked to perform a set of tasks using both the original and redesigned MyMeds and SkinCare modules to assess their efficiency and effectiveness. Usability was measured using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire to evaluate 10 new accessibility features that were added to the redesigned app. Participants were also asked which version they preferred.

Results

In total, 24 participants with disabilities and varying degrees of dexterity impairments completed the entire study protocol. Participants displayed improved efficiency and effectiveness when using the redesigned modules compared with the original modules. The participants also reported improved usability and preferred the redesigned modules.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the iMHere system became more efficient, effective, and usable for individuals with dexterity impairments after redesigning it according to user-centered principles.

Development of the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice (Can-SCIP) Guideline: Methods and overview

INTRODUCTION

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-altering injury that leads to a complex constellation of changes in an individual's sensory, motor, and autonomic function which is largely determined by the level and severity of cord impairment. Available SCI-specific clinical practice guidelines (CPG) address specific impairments, health conditions or a segment of the care continuum, however, fail to address all the important clinical questions arising throughout an individual's care journey. To address this gap, an interprofessional panel of experts in SCI convened to develop the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice (Can-SCIP) Guideline. This article provides an overview of the methods underpinning the Can-SCIP Guideline process.

METHODS

The Can-SCIP Guideline was developed using the Guidelines Adaptation Cycle. A comprehensive search for existing SCI-specific CPGs was conducted. The quality of eligible CPGs was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. An expert panel (n = 52) convened, and groups of relevant experts met to review and recommend adoption or refinement of existing recommendations or develop new recommendations based on evidence from systematic reviews conducted by the Spinal Cord Injury Research Evidence (SCIRE) team. The expert panel voted to approve selected recommendations using an online survey tool.

RESULTS

The Can-SCIP Guideline includes 585 total recommendations from 41 guidelines, 96 recommendations that pertain to the Components of the Ideal SCI Care System section, and 489 recommendations that pertain to the Management of Secondary Health Conditions section. Most recommendations (n = 281, 48%) were adopted from existing guidelines without revision, 215 (36.8%) recommendations were revised for application in a Canadian context, and 89 recommendations (15.2%) were created de novo.

CONCLUSION

The Can-SCIP Guideline is the first living comprehensive guideline for adults with SCI in Canada across the care continuum.

Silencing of Long Non-Coding RNA (lncRNA) Nuclear Paraspeckle Assembly Transcript 1 (NEAT1) Protects PC-12 Cells from LPS-Induced Injury via Targeting miR-29a

Background

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating neuropathological condition that significantly affects the quality of life. The present study is basic research examining the underlying mechanisms of NEAT1 and miR-29a in regulating LPS-induced PC-12 cell injury.

Material/Methods

The model of cell injury was induced by the treatment of PC-12 cells with LPS. The expressions of NEAT1, miR-29a, and inflammatory cytokines were measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reactions (RT-qPCR). Cell proliferation and apoptosis were evaluated by CCK-8 and flow cytometry, respectively. Finally, the target between miR-29a and NEAT1 as well as miR-29a and BCL2L11 was investigated by luciferase and RNA pull-down assays.

Results

Knockdown of NEAT1 can inhibit inflammatory cytokine expression and PC-12 cell apoptosis and promote PC-12 cell proliferation by targeting miR-29a. However, the variation caused by NEAT1 knockdown can be reversed by the silencing of miR-29a and the overexpression of BCL2L11, which is the direct target gene of miR-29a.

Conclusions

High NEAT1 levels can increase LPS-induced injury in PC-12 cells through the miR-29a/BCL2L11 pathway. lncRNA NEAT1 may, therefore, be a promising target for SCI treatment.

What self-care behaviours are essential for people with spinal cord injury? A systematic review and meta-synthesis

Purpose: To systematically identify, evaluate, and synthesise the qualitative literature on the self-care behaviours, skills, and strategies performed by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).Review methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) meta-aggregation method was followed. The search was conducted on five databases and limited to papers published from January 2000 to March 2020. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted the data from, and assessed the methodological quality of selected papers using the JBI qualitative assessment and critical appraisal instrument.Results: Eleven qualitative papers were included. Three synthesised findings with a moderate level of confidence emerged from 90 findings: people with SCI perform self-directed or directed-by-other behaviours focused on their physical condition (i); and on their social life (ii); people with SCI perform self-directed behaviours focused on their emotional well-being (iii). Individuals with SCI are aware of their condition and incorporate self-care behaviours into their routine to maintain health and prevent complications.Conclusion: This meta-synthesis provides evidence on the self-care behaviours performed by people with SCI to prevent, control, and manage the physical, emotional, and social effects of their condition. These findings may help healthcare providers to understand the self-care process in SCI survivors and tailor educational programmes to their experiences.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSCI survivors are directly responsible for their health and must reach their maximum level of independence by acquiring self-care behaviours and adjusting them over time.Self-care behaviours must be incorporated into SCI survivors' daily routine to maintain their condition, promote their social participation, and prevent complications.Caregiver contributions to self-care should be given more value, as these are fundamental to maintain SCI survivors' well-being and social participation.