1
|
Crutzen S, Burger SR, Visser E, Ising HK, van der Gaag M, Castelein S. Societal recovery trajectories in people with a psychotic disorder in long term care: a latent class growth analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2025; 60:387-397. [PMID: 39080009 PMCID: PMC11839786 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-024-02715-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE For many individuals with a psychotic disorder societal recovery is not accomplished. Research on societal recovery trajectories is mostly focussed on patients with a first episode psychosis. The present study aims to identify distinct societal trajectories in those with long duration of illness, through the identification of patient subgroups that are characterized by homogeneous trajectories. METHODS Longitudinal data were used from an ongoing dynamic cohort in which people with a psychotic disorder receive yearly measurements to perform a latent class growth analysis. Societal functioning was assessed with the Functional Recovery tool, consisting of three items (1) daily living and self-care, (2) work, study and housekeeping, and (3) social contacts. Furthermore, logistic regression was used to compare subgroups with similar societal recovery at baseline, but distinct trajectories. RESULTS A total of 1476 people were included with a mean treatment time of 19 years (SD 10.1). Five trajectories of functioning were identified, a high stable (24.5%), a medium stable (28.3%), a low stable (12.7%), a high declining (11.2%) and a medium increasing subgroup (23.3%). Predictors for not deteriorating included happiness, recent hospitalisation, being physically active, middle or higher education and fewer negative symptoms. Predictors for improving included fewer positive and negative symptoms, fewer behavioural problems and fewer physical and cognitive impairments. CONCLUSION While the majority of individuals show a stable trajectory over four years, there were more patients achieving societal recovery than patients deteriorating. Predictors for improvement are mainly related to symptoms and behavioural problems, while predictors for deteriorating are related to non-symptomatic aspects such as physical activity, happiness and level of education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn Crutzen
- Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Lentis Research, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Simone R Burger
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychosis Research and Innovation, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Visser
- University Medical Center Groningen, Rob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Center Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Helga K Ising
- Rivierduinen Institute for Mental Health Care, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark van der Gaag
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychosis Research and Innovation, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Stynke Castelein
- Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Lentis Research, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Groningen, 9712 TS, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slot MIE, van Hell HH, Rossum IWV, Dazzan P, Maat A, de Haan L, Crespo-Facorro B, Glenthøj B, Lawrie SM, McDonald C, Gruber O, van Amelsvoort T, Arango C, Kircher T, Nelson B, Galderisi S, Weiser M, Sachs G, Maatz A, Bressan RA, Kwon JS, Mizrahi R, McGuire P, Kahn RS. A naturalistic cohort study of first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder: A description of the early phase of illness in the PSYSCAN cohort. Schizophr Res 2024; 266:237-248. [PMID: 38431986 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined the course of illness over a 12-month period in a large, international multi-center cohort of people with a first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder (FES) in a naturalistic, prospective study (PSYSCAN). METHOD Patients with a first episode of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder (depressive type) or schizophreniform disorder were recruited at 16 institutions in Europe, Israel and Australia. Participants (N = 304) received clinical treatment as usual throughout the study. RESULTS The mean age of the cohort was 24.3 years (SD = 5.6), and 67 % were male. At baseline, participants presented with a range of intensities of psychotic symptoms, 80 % were taking antipsychotic medication, 68 % were receiving psychological treatment, with 46.5 % in symptomatic remission. The mean duration of untreated psychosis was 6.2 months (SD = 17.0). After one year, 67 % were in symptomatic remission and 61 % were in functional remission, but 31 % had been readmitted to hospital at some time after baseline. In the cohort as a whole, depressive symptoms remained stable over the follow-up period. In patients with a current depressive episode at baseline, depressive symptoms slightly improved. Alcohol, tobacco and cannabis were the most commonly used substances, with daily users of cannabis ranging between 9 and 11 % throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS This study provides valuable insight into the early course of a broad range of clinical and functional aspects of illness in FES patients in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot I E Slot
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Hendrika H van Hell
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Inge Winter-van Rossum
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health System, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1230, New York, NY 10029-6574, United States of America.
| | - Paola Dazzan
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark 458 Hill, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.
| | - Arija Maat
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Lieuwe de Haan
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Psychiatry, Department Early Psychosis, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Benedicto Crespo-Facorro
- CIBERSAM, Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red Salud Mental, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, University of Sevilla. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, IBiS-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
| | - Birte Glenthøj
- Centre for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR) & Centre for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CINS), Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Stephen M Lawrie
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh EH10 5HF, United Kingdom.
| | - Colm McDonald
- Centre for Neuroimaging & Cognitive Genomics (NICOG), Galway Neuroscience Centre, College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Oliver Gruber
- Section for Experimental Psychopathology and Neuroimaging, Department of General Psychiatry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thérèse van Amelsvoort
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Mondriaan Mental Health Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Celso Arango
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red del área de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Tilo Kircher
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmann-Straße 8, D-35039 Marburg, Germany.
| | - Barnaby Nelson
- Orygen, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Silvana Galderisi
- University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Mark Weiser
- Department of Psychiatry, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Gabriele Sachs
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| | - Anke Maatz
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Rodrigo A Bressan
- Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Lab for Clinical Neurosciences (LiNC), Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jun Soo Kwon
- Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Dahakno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Romina Mizrahi
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Philip McGuire
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - René S Kahn
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health System, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1230, New York, NY 10029-6574, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brooks H, Devereux-Fitzgerald A, Richmond L, Caton N, Cherry MG, Bee P, Lovell K, Downs J, Edwards BM, Vassilev I, Bush L, Rogers A. Exploring the use of social network interventions for adults with mental health difficulties: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:486. [PMID: 37420228 PMCID: PMC10329398 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04881-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with mental health difficulties often experience social isolation. The importance of interventions to enhance social networks and reduce this isolation is increasingly being recognised. However, the literature has not yet been systematically reviewed with regards to how these are best used. This narrative synthesis aimed to investigate the role of social network interventions for people with mental health difficulties and identify barriers and facilitators to effective delivery. This was undertaken with a view to understanding how social network interventions might work best in the mental health field. METHODS Systematic searches using combinations of synonyms for mental health difficulties and social network interventions were undertaken across 7 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) and 2 grey literature databases (EThoS and OpenGrey) from their inception to October 2021. We included studies reporting primary qualitative and quantitative data from all study types relating to the use of social network interventions for people with mental health difficulties. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively. RESULTS The review included 54 studies, reporting data from 6,249 participants. Social network interventions were generally beneficial for people with mental health difficulties but heterogeneity in intervention type, implementation and evaluation made it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Interventions worked best when they (1) were personalised to individual needs, interests and health, (2) were delivered outside formal health services and (3) provided the opportunity to engage in authentic valued activities. Several barriers to access were identified which, without careful consideration could exacerbate existing health inequalities. Further research is required to fully understand condition-specific barriers which may limit access to, and efficacy of, interventions. CONCLUSIONS Strategies for improving social networks for people with mental health difficulties should focus on supporting engagement with personalised and supported social activities outside of formal mental health services. To optimise access and uptake, accessibility barriers should be carefully considered within implementation contexts and equality, diversity and inclusion should be prioritised in intervention design, delivery and evaluation and in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Brooks
- Mental Health Research Group, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Angela Devereux-Fitzgerald
- Mental Health Research Group, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Laura Richmond
- Mental Health Research Group, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Clinical, Education & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Neil Caton
- Patient and Public Involvement Contributor, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mary Gemma Cherry
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Linda McCartney Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot St, Liverpool, UK
| | - Penny Bee
- Mental Health Research Group, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Mental Health Research Group, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - James Downs
- Patient and Public Involvement Contributor, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Ivaylo Vassilev
- NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Anne Rogers
- NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Erzin G, Pries LK, Dimitrakopoulos S, Ralli I, Xenaki LA, Soldatos R–F, Vlachos I, Selakovic M, Foteli S, Kosteletos I, Nianiakas N, Mantonakis L, Rizos E, Kollias K, Van Os J, Guloksuz S, Stefanis N. Association between exposome score for schizophrenia and functioning in first-episode psychosis: results from the Athens first-episode psychosis research study. Psychol Med 2023; 53:2609-2618. [PMID: 34789350 PMCID: PMC10123830 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291721004542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that environmental factors not only increase psychosis liability but also influence the prognosis and outcomes of psychotic disorders. We investigated temporal and cross-sectional associations of a weighted score of cumulative environmental liability for schizophrenia - the exposome score for schizophrenia (ES-SCZ) - with functioning in first-episode psychosis (FEP). METHODS Data were derived from the baseline and 1-month assessments of the Athens FEP Research Study that enrolled 225 individuals with FEP. The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) were used to measure social, occupational, and psychological functioning. The ES-SCZ was calculated based on the previously validated method. RESULTS ES-SCZ was associated with the total scores of GAF and PSP at baseline and 1-month assessments. These findings remained significant when accounting for several associated alternative explanatory variables, including other environmental factors (obstetric complications, migration, ethnic minority), clinical characteristics (duration of untreated psychosis, symptom severity, previous antipsychotic use), and family history of psychosis, demonstrating that the association between ES-SCZ and functioning is over and above other risk factors and cannot be explained by symptom severity alone. Functioning improved from baseline to 1-month assessment, but no significant ES-SCZ-by-time interaction was found on functioning, indicating that functioning changes were not contingent on ES-SCZ. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that rather than a predictor of functional improvement, ES-SCZ represents a stable severity indicator that captures poor functioning in early psychosis. Environmental risk loading for schizophrenia (ES-SCZ) can be beneficial for clinical characterization and incorporated into transdiagnostic staging models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gamze Erzin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Health Sciences Ankara Diskapi Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lotta-Katrin Pries
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Stefanos Dimitrakopoulos
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
- Psychiatric Clinic, 414 Military Hospital of Athens, Penteli, Greece
| | - Irene Ralli
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Lida-Alkisti Xenaki
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Rigas – Filippos Soldatos
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ilias Vlachos
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Mirjana Selakovic
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Stefania Foteli
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Kosteletos
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikos Nianiakas
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Leonidas Mantonakis
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Rizos
- Second Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, ‘ATTIKON’ University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Kollias
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Jim Van Os
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sinan Guloksuz
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nikos Stefanis
- First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Macfie WG, Spilka MJ, Bartolomeo LA, Gonzalez CM, Strauss GP. Emotion regulation and social knowledge in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis and outpatients with chronic schizophrenia: Associations with functional outcome and negative symptoms. Early Interv Psychiatry 2023; 17:21-28. [PMID: 35362242 PMCID: PMC10084209 DOI: 10.1111/eip.13287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
AIM Previous studies indicate that several aspects of social cognition are associated with poor social and vocational outcome in the chronic phase of psychosis. However, it is less clear whether specific aspects of social cognition are impaired in those at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis and associated with functioning. The current study evaluated two understudied components of social cognition, emotion regulation knowledge and social knowledge, to determine whether CHR and chronic schizophrenia (SZ) samples demonstrated comparable magnitudes of impairment and associations with functioning. METHODS Two studies were conducted. Study 1 included n = 98 outpatients with chronic SZ and n = 88 demographically matched healthy controls (CN). Study 2 included 30 CHR and 30 matched CN participants. In both studies, participants completed the emotion management and social management subtests of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test to assess emotion regulation knowledge and social knowledge, respectively. A battery of clinical interviews was also administered, including measures of: role and social functioning, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, disorganization and general symptoms. RESULTS Individuals with SZ demonstrated lower emotion management and social management scores than CN participants. CHR demonstrated lower scores in social management than CN but did not display deficits in emotion management. In both studies, reduced social knowledge was associated with worse functioning and negative symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate that deficits in social knowledge are transphasic across the SZ spectrum, and are associated with clinical functioning. Social knowledge may be a novel treatment target for psychosocial interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William G Macfie
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael J Spilka
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Lisa A Bartolomeo
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Gregory P Strauss
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A Scoping and Systematic Review of Employment Processes and Outcomes for Young Adults Experiencing Psychosis. Community Ment Health J 2022; 59:728-755. [PMID: 36463531 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-01056-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Young adults who experience psychosis want to work but are less likely to be employed than their peers. Sixty two studies relating to young adults with psychosis and employment were reviewed following a systematic search of five databases: CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and EMBASE. Publication date ranged from 1973 to 2019 with > 70% between 2010 and 2019. Intervention was considered in 29 papers; critical appraisal revealed 90% of these had moderate to good methodological quality with only three RCTs. Of 11 intervention types "Early Intervention" and "Individual Placement and Support" were most common; both demonstrating positive impact on obtaining employment. The review identified minimal participant perspectives and great variability in: terminology used; the reporting of participant attributes; intervention characteristics and ways employment outcomes were measured. Employment processes identified were preparing for, seeking, obtaining, keeping and re-obtaining employment, with current research efforts focused on obtaining work. More focus is required on keeping and re-obtaining employment.
Collapse
|
7
|
Samuel T, Nigussie K, Mirkena Y, Azale T. Relationship between social support and schizophrenia relapse among patients with schizophrenia on follow-up at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A case-control study. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:980614. [PMID: 36506425 PMCID: PMC9730020 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.980614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe mental illnesses affect about 4% of the adult population worldwide. The illness is highly related to the relapse rate and can cause cognitive, social, and functional deterioration in patients. While there are some factors that are known to be protective of the occurrence of relapse in schizophrenia, having good social support is found to be one of the strongest factors. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the association between relapse and poor social support in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS With unmatched case-control (case-patients with schizophrenia with poor social support and controls-patients with schizophrenia with good social support), the study included 408 patients with schizophrenia on a follow-up at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital from March to May; 2020. The convenience sampling technique was used to draw the participants. Social support was assessed by the Oslo social support scale (Oslo-3), whereas Family Emotional Involvement and Criticism Scale and Medication Adherence Rating Scale-10 (MARS-10) were used to assess the emotion expressed and adherence to medication, respectively. Epidemiological Information (Epi Info) version 7 was used for data coding and entry, which were then exported to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22 for analysis. Unconditioned binary logistic regression analysis and bivariate correlation analysis were carried out. RESULTS Out of 408 samples, 396 participants, of which 194 were cases and 202 were controls, were included in the study with a response rate of 97.06%. The mean and standard deviation (SD) age of the participants was 36.06 ± 9.842 years. From 194 cases, 61.1% of them were reported to have poor social support. In multiple logistic regression, only social support was found to be statistically significant [p < 0.001, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.102, confidence interval (CI) (95%) = (1.985-4.848)]. Hence, the odds of having relapse were 3.102 higher in those who have poor social support when compared to those with good social support. Emotional involvement, financial problems, and stressful life events were found to indirectly affect relapse by having a negative correlation with social support. CONCLUSION The present study showed that there was a relationship between relapse and social support, and this indicates that social support can be a good predictor of schizophrenia relapse. The caregivers and clinicians of the patients should increase their support to the patients, while hospitals with mental health services have to encourage formation of better social support for the patients, including psychosocial interventions which will be performed to enhance the social support system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tinbete Samuel
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Nursing, College of Medical and Health Sciences, Hawasa University, Hawasa, Ethiopia
| | - Kabtamu Nigussie
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia
| | - Yohannes Mirkena
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Telake Azale
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mustafa SS, Malla A, Joober R, Abadi S, Latimer E, Schmitz N, Jarvis GE, Margolese HC, Casacalenda N, Abdel-Baki A, Iyer SN. Unfinished business: Functional outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of a three-year extension of early intervention versus regular care following two years of early intervention for psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2022; 145:86-99. [PMID: 34599603 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether first-episode psychosis patients receiving extended early intervention had better functional outcomes than those in regular care and to examine the predictors of functional outcomes. METHODS This is a randomized controlled single-blind trial of 220 patients randomized after 2 years of early intervention to receive early intervention or regular care for the subsequent 3 years. Outcomes included cumulative time in functional recovery during the 3-year trial assessed using the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS); and employment/education at last assessment which were, respectively, analyzed using multiple linear regression and logistic regression, accounting for well-known predictors. Linear mixed and generalized linear models were also used to examine the course of SOFAS and employment/education over the 3-year period. RESULTS The extended early intervention and regular care groups did not differ on time in functional recovery (mean = 50.17 weeks, SD = 46.62 vs. mean = 46.18 weeks, SD = 51.54); percent employed/in school (60.4% vs. 68.8%) or change in SOFAS or employment/education status over time. SOFAS scores were stable between years 2 and 5. Individuals with longer periods of total symptom remission experienced significantly longer periods of functional recovery and were likelier to be employed/in school. Those who had completed high school were nine times likelier to be employed/studying. CONCLUSION Most individuals maintained functional gains accrued from 2 years of early intervention with no further improvement whether in extended early intervention or regular care. There was a gap between symptomatic and functional recovery, and one-third were unemployed/not in school at year 5. The lack of additional progress even in extended early intervention suggests that specific interventions addressing functional roles need to be provided beyond the first 2 years of early intervention. Sustaining symptom remission and high-school completion may be additional avenues for targeting functional recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally S Mustafa
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ashok Malla
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ridha Joober
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sherezad Abadi
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Eric Latimer
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Norbert Schmitz
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Population-Based Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - G Eric Jarvis
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Howard C Margolese
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nicola Casacalenda
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Srividya N Iyer
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
General Functioning in Patients With First-Episode Psychosis After the First 18 Months of Treatment. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2021; 40:366-372. [PMID: 32639289 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000001224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the main goals in the treatment of first-episode psychosis (FEP) is achieving functional remission. This study aims to analyze whether initial neurocognitive status and the use of specific pharmacological and psychosocial treatment options in FEP can predict general functioning after 18 months of treatment. METHODS We conducted a longitudinal naturalistic study with a sample of 129 patients with FEP treated at 2 Croatian psychiatric clinics from 2016until 2018. Ordinal regression was used to predict the global level of functioning assessed with the Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF) at the 18th month of treatment from the baseline symptoms (assessed with a set of neurocognitive tests) and different treatment options. RESULTS Higher score on GAF at the 18th month was significantly predicted by female sex, better baseline verbal memory and GAF scores, and the type of treatment. Group multimodal psychosocial treatment, antipsychotic polytherapy, and not being treated with sedatives at baseline predicted better GAF scores at follow-up. In the exploratory analysis, taking sedatives in the final assessment and being rehospitalized due to relapse predicted worse GAF scores at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Although baseline neurocognitive features and baseline general functioning seem to influence the overall long-term functioning of persons with FEP, addition of a multimodal group psychosocial treatment program and appropriate medication seem to be equally important for improving the patients' level of functioning after the FEP.
Collapse
|
10
|
Puntis S, Minichino A, De Crescenzo F, Cipriani A, Lennox B, Harrison R. Specialised early intervention teams (extended time) for recent-onset psychosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 11:CD013287. [PMID: 33135812 PMCID: PMC8094422 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013287.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychosis is an illness characterised by the presence of hallucinations and delusions that can cause distress or a marked change in an individual's behaviour (e.g. social withdrawal, flat or blunted effect). A first episode of psychosis (FEP) is the first time someone experiences these symptoms that can occur at any age, but the condition is most common in late adolescence and early adulthood. This review is concerned with FEP and the early stages of a psychosis, referred to throughout this review as 'recent-onset psychosis.' Specialised early intervention (SEI) teams are community mental health teams that specifically treat people who are experiencing, or have experienced, a recent-onset psychosis. SEI teams provide a range of treatments including medication, psychotherapy, psychoeducation, educational and employment support, augmented by assertive contact with the service user and small caseloads. Treatment is time limited, usually offered for two to three years, after which service users are either discharged to primary care or transferred to a standard adult community mental health team. Evidence suggests that once SEI treatment ends, improvements may not be sustained, bringing uncertainty about the optimal duration of SEI to ensure the best long-term outcomes. Extending SEI has been proposed as a way of providing continued intensive treatment and continuity of care, of usually up to five years, in order to a) sustain the positive initial outcomes of SEI; and b) improve the long-term trajectory of the illness. OBJECTIVES To compare extended SEI teams with treatment as usual (TAU) for people with recent-onset psychosis. To compare extended SEI teams with standard SEI teams followed by TAU (standard SEI + TAU) for people with recent-onset psychosis. SEARCH METHODS On 3 October 2018 and 22 October 2019, we searched Cochrane Schizophrenia's study-based register of trials, including registries of clinical trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing extended SEI with TAU for people with recent-onset psychosis and all RCTs comparing extended SEI with standard SEI + TAU for people with recent-onset psychosis. We entered trials meeting these criteria and reporting usable data as included studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently inspected citations, selected studies, extracted data and appraised study quality. For binary outcomes we calculated the risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes we calculated the mean difference (MD) and their 95% CIs, or if assessment measures differed for the same construct, we calculated the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and created a 'Summary of findings' table using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included three RCTs, with a total 780 participants, aged 16 to 35 years. All participants met the criteria for schizophrenia spectrum disorders or affective psychoses. No trials compared extended SEI with TAU. All three trials randomly allocated people approximately two years into standard SEI to either extended SEI or standard SEI + TAU. The certainty of evidence for outcomes varied from low to very low. Our primary outcomes were recovery and disengagement from mental health services. No trials reported on recovery, and we used remission as a proxy. Three trials reported on remission, with the point estimate suggesting a 13% increase in remission in favour of extended SEI, but this included wide confidence intervals (CIs) and a very uncertain estimate of no benefit (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.31; 3 trials, 780 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two trials provided data on disengagement from services with evidence that extended SEI care may result in fewer disengagements from mental health treatment (15%) in comparison to standard SEI + TAU (34%) (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.75; 2 trials, 380 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be no evidence of a difference in rates of psychiatric hospital admission (RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.52; 1 trial, 160 participants; low-certainty evidence), or the number of days spent in a psychiatric hospital (MD -2.70, 95% CI -8.30 to 2.90; 1 trial, 400 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial found uncertain evidence regarding lower global psychotic symptoms in extended SEI in comparison to standard SEI + TAU (MD -1.90, 95% CI -3.28 to -0.52; 1 trial, 156 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether the use of extended SEI over standard SEI + TAU resulted in fewer deaths due to all-cause mortality, as so few deaths were recorded in trials (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.64; 3 trials, 780 participants; low-certainty evidence). Very uncertain evidence suggests that using extended SEI instead of standard SEI + TAU may not improve global functioning (SMD 0.23, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.76; 2 trials, 560 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There was low risk of bias in all three trials for random sequence generation, allocation concealment and other biases. All three trials had high risk of bias for blinding of participants and personnel due to the nature of the intervention. For the risk of bias for blinding of outcome assessments and incomplete outcome data there was at least one trial with high or unclear risk of bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There may be preliminary evidence of benefit from extending SEI team care for treating people experiencing psychosis, with fewer people disengaging from mental health services. Evidence regarding other outcomes was uncertain. The certainty of evidence for the measured outcomes was low or very low. Further, suitably powered studies that use a consistent approach to outcome selection are needed, but with only one further ongoing trial, there is unlikely to be any definitive conclusion for the effectiveness of extended SEI for at least the next few years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Puntis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | - Belinda Lennox
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rachael Harrison
- Oxford University Medical School, Medical Sciences Divisional Office, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Puntis S, Minichino A, De Crescenzo F, Cipriani A, Lennox B, Harrison R. Specialised early intervention teams for recent-onset psychosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 11:CD013288. [PMID: 33135811 PMCID: PMC8092671 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013288.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychosis is an illness characterised by the presence of hallucinations and delusions that can cause distress or a marked change in an individual's behaviour (e.g. social withdrawal, flat or blunted effect). A first episode of psychosis (FEP) is the first time someone experiences these symptoms that can occur at any age, but the condition is most common in late adolescence and early adulthood. This review is concerned with first episode psychosis (FEP) and the early stages of a psychosis, referred to throughout this review as 'recent-onset psychosis.' Specialised early intervention (SEI) teams are community mental health teams that specifically treat people who are experiencing, or have experienced a recent-onset psychosis. The purpose of SEI teams is to intensively treat people with psychosis early in the course of the illness with the goal of increasing the likelihood of recovery and reducing the need for longer-term mental health treatment. SEI teams provide a range of treatments including medication, psychotherapy, psychoeducation, and occupational, educational and employment support, augmented by assertive contact with the service user and small caseloads. Treatment is time limited, usually offered for two to three years, after which service users are either discharged to primary care or transferred to a standard adult community mental health team. A previous Cochrane Review of SEI found preliminary evidence that SEI may be superior to standard community mental health care (described as 'treatment as usual (TAU)' in this review) but these recommendations were based on data from only one trial. This review updates the evidence for the use of SEI services. OBJECTIVES To compare specialised early intervention (SEI) teams to treatment as usual (TAU) for people with recent-onset psychosis. SEARCH METHODS On 3 October 2018 and 22 October 2019, we searched Cochrane Schizophrenia's study-based register of trials, including registries of clinical trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SEI with TAU for people with recent-onset psychosis. We entered trials meeting these criteria and reporting useable data as included studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently inspected citations, selected studies, extracted data and appraised study quality. For binary outcomes we calculated the risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes we calculated the mean difference (MD) and their 95% CIs, or if assessment measures differed for the same construct, we calculated the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and created a 'Summary of findings' table using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included three RCTs and one cluster-RCT with a total of 1145 participants. The mean age in the trials was between 23.1 years (RAISE) and 26.6 years (OPUS). The included participants were 405 females (35.4%) and 740 males (64.6%). All trials took place in community mental healthcare settings. Two trials reported on recovery from psychosis at the end of treatment, with evidence that SEI team care may result in more participants in recovery than TAU at the end of treatment (73% versus 52%; RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.97; 2 studies, 194 participants; low-certainty evidence). Three trials provided data on disengagement from services at the end of treatment, with fewer participants probably being disengaged from mental health services in SEI (8%) in comparison to TAU (15%) (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.79; 3 studies, 630 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was low-certainty evidence that SEI may result in fewer admissions to psychiatric hospital than TAU at the end of treatment (52% versus 57%; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.00; 4 studies, 1145 participants) and low-certainty evidence that SEI may result in fewer psychiatric hospital days (MD -27.00 days, 95% CI -53.68 to -0.32; 1 study, 547 participants). Two trials reported on general psychotic symptoms at the end of treatment, with no evidence of a difference between SEI and TAU, although this evidence is very uncertain (SMD -0.41, 95% CI -4.58 to 3.75; 2 studies, 304 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A different pattern was observed in assessment of general functioning with an end of trial difference that may favour SEI (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.66; 2 studies, 467 participants; low-certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether the use of SEI resulted in fewer deaths due to all-cause mortality at end of treatment (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.20; 3 studies, 741 participants; low-certainty evidence). There was low risk of bias for random sequence generation and allocation concealment in three of the four included trials; the remaining trial had unclear risk of bias. Due to the nature of the intervention, we considered all trials at high risk of bias for blinding of participants and personnel. Two trials had low risk of bias and two trials had high risk of bias for blinding of outcomes assessments. Three trials had low risk of bias for incomplete outcome data, while one trial had high risk of bias. Two trials had low risk of bias, one trial had high risk of bias, and one had unclear risk of bias for selective reporting. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is evidence that SEI may provide benefits to service users during treatment compared to TAU. These benefits probably include fewer disengagements from mental health services (moderate-certainty evidence), and may include small reductions in psychiatric hospitalisation (low-certainty evidence), and a small increase in global functioning (low-certainty evidence) and increased service satisfaction (moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence regarding the effect of SEI over TAU after treatment has ended is uncertain. Further evidence investigating the longer-term outcomes of SEI is needed. Furthermore, all the eligible trials included in this review were conducted in high-income countries, and it is unclear whether these findings would translate to low- and middle-income countries, where both the intervention and the comparison conditions may be different.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Puntis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | - Belinda Lennox
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rachael Harrison
- Oxford University Medical School, Medical Sciences Divisional Office, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kirschenbaum MA, Birnbaum ML, Rizvi A, Muscat W, Patel L, Kane JM. Google search activity in early psychosis: A qualitative analysis of internet search query content in first episode psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry 2020; 14:606-612. [PMID: 31637869 DOI: 10.1111/eip.12886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM Manually explore the Google search queries of individuals with first episode psychosis prior to their first hospitalization, in effort to identify common themes and search interests during the period of emerging illness. METHODS Individuals hospitalized for psychosis between December 2016 and September 2017 provided access to their Google archive data for manual qualitative evaluation of search content. Searches conducted during the 6-month time period prior to the participant's first hospitalization for psychosis were extracted and evaluated for search activity associated with mental health. RESULTS Of 20 archives reviewed, 15 individuals (75%) searched for information classified by reviewers as related to mental health. Searches with content associated with delusions were found in 15 participant archives (75%). Searches related to negative symptoms including social withdrawal and decline in function were identified in 6 participant's search archives (30%). Four participants (20%) had searches that were associated with thought processes, and 2 participants (10%) searched for information on suicide. Four participants (20%) searched for information related to anxiety, whereas 3 participants (15%) had searches related to depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Individuals with early psychosis appear to be using the Internet for obtaining information about their early symptoms and experiences prior to their first contact with psychiatric care. Improving our understanding of the ways by which individuals with emerging psychosis search for information about their experiences online may help mental health clinicians tailor online resources in hopes of improving pathways to care and reducing the duration of untreated psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Kirschenbaum
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York.,Department of Psychiatry, The Donald and Barbra Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
| | - Michael L Birnbaum
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York.,The Zucker School of Medicine Residency in General Adult Psychiatry at the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.,The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
| | - Asra Rizvi
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York
| | - Whitney Muscat
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York
| | - Lalit Patel
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York
| | - John M Kane
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York.,The Zucker School of Medicine Residency in General Adult Psychiatry at the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.,The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McGinty J, Upthegrove R. Depressive symptoms during first episode psychosis and functional outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res 2020; 218:14-27. [PMID: 31964558 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES First episode psychosis (FEP) is associated with functional decline. Existing evidence was synthesised to explore the influence of depressive symptoms during FEP on future social, occupational and global functioning. METHODS Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, Open Grey, NICE Evidence and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2018. Longitudinal studies of FEP patients were included. Study quality was assessed using the Downs and Black instrument. Two meta-analyses were performed using random effect models. The first meta-analysis correlates depressive symptoms during FEP with follow-up Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores. The second meta-analysis shows the odds of long-term functional remission if depressive symptoms are present during FEP. RESULTS 4751 unique abstracts were found. 36 articles were included. The first meta-analysis included 7 studies (932 participants) and showed depressive symptoms during FEP were negatively correlated with follow-up GAF scores (r = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.24 to -0.09, p < 0.001). The second meta-analysis of 9 studies (2265 participants) showed weak evidence of an association between the presence of depressive symptoms in FEP and reduction in functional remission (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.13, p = 0.294). CONCLUSION Depressive symptoms during FEP are associated with poorer long-term global functioning and may be associated with a reduced chance of achieving functional remission. Clinical trials are needed to identify efficacious management of depressive symptoms in early psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica McGinty
- University of Birmingham, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Upthegrove
- University of Birmingham, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Institute for Mental Health, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Early Intervention Service, Birmingham Womens and Childrens NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Colizzi M, Lasalvia A, Ruggeri M. Prevention and early intervention in youth mental health: is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for care? Int J Ment Health Syst 2020; 14:23. [PMID: 32226481 PMCID: PMC7092613 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-020-00356-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Similar to other health care sectors, mental health has moved towards the secondary prevention, with the effort to detect and treat mental disorders as early as possible. However, converging evidence sheds new light on the potential of primary preventive and promotion strategies for mental health of young people. We aimed to reappraise such evidence. METHODS We reviewed the current state of knowledge on delivering promotion and preventive interventions addressing youth mental health. RESULTS Half of all mental disorders start by 14 years and are usually preceded by non-specific psychosocial disturbances potentially evolving in any major mental disorder and accounting for 45% of the global burden of disease across the 0-25 age span. While some action has been taken to promote the implementation of services dedicated to young people, mental health needs during this critical period are still largely unmet. This urges redesigning preventive strategies in a youth-focused multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic framework which might early modify possible psychopathological trajectories. CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests that it would be unrealistic to consider promotion and prevention in mental health responsibility of mental health professionals alone. Integrated and multidisciplinary services are needed to increase the range of possible interventions and limit the risk of poor long-term outcome, with also potential benefits in terms of healthcare system costs. However, mental health professionals have the scientific, ethical, and moral responsibility to indicate the direction to all social, political, and other health care bodies involved in the process of meeting mental health needs during youth years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Colizzi
- 1Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
- 2Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF UK
| | - Antonio Lasalvia
- 1Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Mirella Ruggeri
- 1Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Phahladira L, Luckhoff HK, Asmal L, Kilian S, Scheffler F, Plessis SD, Chiliza B, Emsley R. Early recovery in the first 24 months of treatment in first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. NPJ SCHIZOPHRENIA 2020; 6:2. [PMID: 31913311 PMCID: PMC6949247 DOI: 10.1038/s41537-019-0091-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Studies assessing the treatment outcomes in first-episode schizophrenia have reported mixed results. While symptom improvement is frequently robust, when other domains are considered outcomes are generally poorer. We explored response trajectories, rates and predictors of recovery in the domains of core psychopathology, clinician-rated social and occupational functioning and patient-rated quality of life over 24 months of treatment in 98 patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders who were treated with a long-acting antipsychotic medication. There was robust improvement in core psychopathology (effect size d = 3.36) and functionality (d = 1.78), with most improvement occurring within the first six months of treatment. In contrast, improvement in subjective quality of life was less marked (d = 0.37) and slower, only reaching significance after 12 months of treatment. Symptom remission was achieved by 70% of patients and over half met our criteria for functional remission and good quality of life. However, only 29% met the full criteria for recovery. Patients who met the recovery criteria had better premorbid adjustment, were less likely to be of mixed ethnicity and substance use emerged as the only modifiable predictor of recovery. Only 9% of our sample achieved both functional remission and good quality of life despite not being in symptom remission. We found high rates of symptom remission, functional remission and good quality of life in patients, although relatively few achieved recovery by meeting all three of the outcome criteria. Symptom remission is not a necessary prerequisite for functional remission and good quality of life, although few non-remitters achieve other recovery criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lebogang Phahladira
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
| | - Hilmar K Luckhoff
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Laila Asmal
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Sanja Kilian
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Frederika Scheffler
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Stefan du Plessis
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Bonginkosi Chiliza
- Department of Psychiatry, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Robin Emsley
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Velligan DI, Maples NJ, Pokorny JJ, Wright C. Assessment of adherence to oral antipsychotic medications: What has changed over the past decade? Schizophr Res 2020; 215:17-24. [PMID: 31767511 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In a previous review, spanning 3 decades, we found that self-report and other non-objective measures were the primary means of assessing adherence to oral antipsychotic medications for individuals with schizophrenia. Moreover, consensus regarding the definition of adherence was completely lacking. Here, we examined the next decade of studies to determine what may have changed. METHOD We searched the peer reviewed literature published between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017 using Google scholar, Science Direct, CINAHL, PsychINFO, PsychARTICLES and Medline. Search terms were medication adherence or medication compliance or medication acceptance or medication follow-through or medication concordance or medication persistence AND schizophrenia. We included articles that assessed adherence behavior. RESULTS The search yielded 663 articles, 363 of these were eliminated. Included studies represent over 560,000 individuals. Definitions of adherence remain variable with cutoffs from 67% to 95%. Subjective measures of adherence remain the most commonly used. However, the use of objective measures has significantly increased, as has the use of electronic claims data. However, the absolute number of studies using objective measures remains low and very few approaches identify the amount of medication actually taken. CONCLUSIONS Some movement toward more standardization and the use of more objective measures of adherence has been made over the past decade. However, objective measures continue to be underutilized and definitions remain variable. Assessing adherence in less than optimal ways calls into question the results of studies purporting to identify reasons for problem adherence and to elucidate the relationships among adherence and other variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn I Velligan
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Natalie J Maples
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Josie J Pokorny
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Candace Wright
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Öngür D, Carter CS, Gur RE, Perkins D, Sawa A, Seidman LJ, Tamminga C, Huggins W, Hamilton C. Common Data Elements for National Institute of Mental Health-Funded Translational Early Psychosis Research. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY: COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2019; 5:10-22. [PMID: 31439493 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health has established the PhenX Toolkit as a web-based resource containing consensus measures freely available to the research community. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) has introduced the Mental Health Research Core Collection as part of the PhenX Toolkit and recently convened the PhenX Early Psychosis Working Group to generate the PhenX Early Psychosis Specialty Collection. The Working Group consisted of two complementary panels for clinical and translational research. We review the process, deliberations, and products of the translational research panel. The Early Psychosis Specialty Collection rationale for measure selection as well as additional information and protocols for obtaining each measure are available on the PhenX website (https://www.phenxtoolkit.org). The NIMH strongly encourages investigators to use instruments from the PhenX Mental Health Research Collections in NIMH-funded studies and discourages use of alternative measures to collect similar data without justification. We also discuss some of the potential advances that can be achieved by collecting common data elements across large-scale longitudinal studies of early psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dost Öngür
- Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts.
| | - Cameron S Carter
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Davis, Davis, California
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Diana Perkins
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Akira Sawa
- Department of Psychiatry, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Larry J Seidman
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carol Tamminga
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | - Wayne Huggins
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Carol Hamilton
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Canal-Rivero M, Lopez-Moriñigo JD, Barrigón ML, Ayesa-Arriola R, Crespo-Facorro B, Ruiz-Veguilla M, Obiols-Llandrich JE. Suicidal Behavior and Personality Traits Contribute to Disability in First-episode Psychosis: A 1-Year Follow-up Study. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2019; 49:798-810. [PMID: 29767457 DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disability encompasses impairments, activity limitations, and restrictions on participation. Improvement in functioning has therefore become a crucial outcome of treatment in psychosis. OBJECTIVE The main aim of this study was to analyze the potential relationship between suicidal behavior after first episode of psychosis (FEP) and family disability. The second aim was to find out whether personality traits are associated with disability dimensions. METHOD The study sample was composed of 65 FEP patients. The personal care, occupational, family, and social dimensions of disability were evaluated at 12 months after FEP. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore any putative outcome factors associated with dimensions of disability. RESULTS Personal care during the 1-year follow-up was significantly impaired in suicide attempters and significantly associated with sociopathic personality traits. A decline in occupational functioning was significantly associated with schizotypy traits. On the other hand, deterioration in family, social, and global functioning at 1 year after FEP was related to poor premorbid adjustment during late adolescence. CONCLUSIONS Suicidal behavior prevention could improve psychosocial functioning, particularly personal care, in FEP. In addition, sociopathic and schizotypy personality traits as well as poor premorbid adjustment during late adolescence appear to be useful early markers of future disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Canal-Rivero
- Department of Psychiatry, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, IDIVAL, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.,Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier-David Lopez-Moriñigo
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Maria-Luisa Barrigón
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz and IIS Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.,Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Ayesa-Arriola
- Department of Psychiatry, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, IDIVAL, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.,Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Benedicto Crespo-Facorro
- Department of Psychiatry, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, IDIVAL, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.,Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla
- Seville Biomedicine Institute Neurodevelopment and Psychosis Group (IBIS), Virgen del Rocío University Hospital/CSIC/University of Seville UGC Mental Health HVR, Seville, Spain
| | - Jordi E Obiols-Llandrich
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chang WC, Kwong VWY, Or Chi Fai P, Lau ESK, Chan GHK, Jim OTT, Hui CLM, Chan SKW, Lee EHM, Chen EYH. Motivational impairment predicts functional remission in first-episode psychosis: 3-Year follow-up of the randomized controlled trial on extended early intervention. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2018; 52:1194-1201. [PMID: 29475381 DOI: 10.1177/0004867418758918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Functional remission represents an intermediate functional milestone toward recovery. Differential relationships of negative symptom sub-domains with functional remission in first-episode psychosis are understudied. We aimed to examine rate and predictors of functional remission in people with first-episode psychosis in the context of a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing 1-year extension of early intervention (i.e. 3-year early intervention) with step-down psychiatric care (i.e. 2-year early intervention). METHOD A total of 160 participants were recruited upon completion of a 2-year specialized early intervention program for first-episode psychosis in Hong Kong and underwent a 1-year randomized controlled trial comparing 1-year extended early intervention with step-down care. Participants were followed up and reassessed 3 years after inclusion to the trial (i.e. 3-year follow-up). Functional remission was operationalized as simultaneous fulfillment of attaining adequate functioning (measured by Social and Occupational Functioning Scale and Role Functioning Scale) at 3-year follow-up and sustained employment in the last 6 months of 3-year study period. Negative symptom measure was delineated into amotivation (i.e. motivational impairment) and diminished expression (i.e. reduced affect and speech output). Data analysis was based on 143 participants who completed follow-up functional assessments. RESULTS A total of 31 (21.7%) participants achieved functional remission status at 3-year follow-up. Multivariate regression analysis showed that lower levels of amotivation (p = 0.010) and better functioning at study intake (p = 0.004) independently predicted functional remission (Final model: Nagelkerke R2 = 0.40, χ2 = 42.9, p < 0.001). Extended early intervention, duration of untreated psychosis and diminished expression did not predict functional remission. CONCLUSION Only approximately one-fifths of early psychosis patients were found to achieve functional remission. Functional impairment remains an unmet treatment need in the early stage of psychotic illness. Our results further suggest that amotivation may represent a critical therapeutic target for functional remission attainment in early psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wing Chung Chang
- Queen Mary Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Vivian Wing Yan Kwong
- Queen Mary Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Emily Sin Kei Lau
- Queen Mary Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Gloria Hoi Kei Chan
- Queen Mary Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Olivia Tsz Ting Jim
- Queen Mary Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Christy Lai Ming Hui
- Queen Mary Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Sherry Kit Wa Chan
- Queen Mary Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Edwin Ho Ming Lee
- Queen Mary Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Eric Yu Hai Chen
- Queen Mary Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Patterns and predictors of trajectories for social and occupational functioning in patients presenting with first-episode non-affective psychosis: A three-year follow-up study. Schizophr Res 2018; 197:131-137. [PMID: 29395604 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 01/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional impairment is prevalent in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP). Longitudinal course of functioning in the early stage of psychotic illness is under-studied. In this report, we aimed to investigate the patterns and baseline predictors of social-occupational functional trajectories over 3 years, utilizing growth mixture modeling (GMM) analysis, in a large representative Chinese young FEP cohort in Hong Kong. METHOD Six hundred seventeen consecutive patients aged 15-25 years presenting with first-episode non-affective psychosis to a specialized early intervention service were studied. Data on demographic, pre-treatment and baseline clinical characteristics were collected. Individual class membership of functioning derived from GMM was based on ratings on Social and Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFAS) measured at five different time-points (baseline, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months) across 3-year follow-up. RESULTS Four distinct functional trajectories were identified including persistently poor (48.1%, n = 320), early improved (31.3%, n = 203), gradually improved (14.8%, n = 69) and improved-deteriorated (5.8%, n = 25) trajectories. Multinomial regression analysis revealed that male gender, lower educational attainment, a diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and a receipt of inpatient treatment upon initial presentation independently predicted persistently poor trajectory membership. CONCLUSION The current study reveals a heterogeneous course of social-occupational functioning in FEP. Our finding that approximately half of the patients displaying persistently poor trajectory over 3 years indicates functional impairment as an unmet therapeutic need in early illness phase. Further research applying individual-based trajectory analysis in FEP is warranted to facilitate better characterization of longitudinal patterns of functioning and development of targeted intervention to promote early recovery.
Collapse
|
21
|
Correll CU, Galling B, Pawar A, Krivko A, Bonetto C, Ruggeri M, Craig TJ, Nordentoft M, Srihari VH, Guloksuz S, Hui CLM, Chen EYH, Valencia M, Juarez F, Robinson DG, Schooler NR, Brunette MF, Mueser KT, Rosenheck RA, Marcy P, Addington J, Estroff SE, Robinson J, Penn D, Severe JB, Kane JM. Comparison of Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual for Early-Phase Psychosis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. JAMA Psychiatry 2018; 75:555-565. [PMID: 29800949 PMCID: PMC6137532 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 519] [Impact Index Per Article: 74.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The value of early intervention in psychosis and allocation of public resources has long been debated because outcomes in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders have remained suboptimal. OBJECTIVE To compare early intervention services (EIS) with treatment as usual (TAU) for early-phase psychosis. DATA SOURCES Systematic literature search of PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov without language restrictions through June 6, 2017. STUDY SELECTION Randomized trials comparing EIS vs TAU in first-episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia spectrum disorders. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Three independent investigators extracted data for a random-effects meta-analysis and prespecified subgroup and meta-regression analyses. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The coprimary outcomes were all-cause treatment discontinuation and at least 1 psychiatric hospitalization during the treatment period. RESULTS Across 10 randomized clinical trials (mean [SD] trial duration, 16.2 [7.4] months; range, 9-24 months) among 2176 patients (mean [SD] age, 27.5 [4.6] years; 1355 [62.3%] male), EIS was associated with better outcomes than TAU at the end of treatment for all 13 meta-analyzable outcomes. These outcomes included the following: all-cause treatment discontinuation (risk ratio [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.80; P < .001), at least 1 psychiatric hospitalization (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90; P = .003), involvement in school or work (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24; P = .01), total symptom severity (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.32; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.17; P < .001), positive symptom severity (SMD, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.32 to -0.11; P < .001), and negative symptom severity (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.42 to -0.14; P < .001). Superiority of EIS regarding all outcomes was evident at 6, 9 to 12, and 18 to 24 months of treatment (except for general symptom severity and depressive symptom severity at 18-24 months). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In early-phase psychosis, EIS are superior to TAU across all meta-analyzable outcomes. These results support the need for funding and use of EIS in patients with early-phase psychosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph U. Correll
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York,Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York,The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Britta Galling
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York,Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aditya Pawar
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York
| | - Anastasia Krivko
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York
| | - Chiara Bonetto
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Mirella Ruggeri
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Thomas J. Craig
- Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, England
| | - Merete Nordentoft
- Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark,The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vinod H. Srihari
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut,Specialized Treatment Early in Psychosis (STEP) Program, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven
| | - Sinan Guloksuz
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut,Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eric Y. H. Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China,State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Marcelo Valencia
- Division of Epidemiological and Psychosocial Research, National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Francisco Juarez
- Division of Epidemiological and Psychosocial Research, National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Delbert G. Robinson
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York,Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York,The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
| | - Nina R. Schooler
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York,Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Mary F. Brunette
- Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth, New Hampshire,Bureau of Behavioral Health, College of Health and Human Services (CHHS), Dartmouth, New Hampshire
| | - Kim T. Mueser
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Psychiatry, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert A. Rosenheck
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut,Department of Epidemiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut,Department of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Patricia Marcy
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York,The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
| | - Jean Addington
- The Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sue E. Estroff
- Department of Social Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | | | - David Penn
- Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | | | - John M. Kane
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York,Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York,The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abdin E, Chong SA, Vaingankar JA, Peh CX, Poon LY, Rao S, Verma S, Subramaniam M. Trajectories of positive, negative and general psychopathology symptoms in first episode psychosis and their relationship with functioning over a 2-year follow-up period. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0187141. [PMID: 29095875 PMCID: PMC5667842 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Few studies have examined the trajectories of symptom severity in first episode psychosis (FEP) and their impact on functioning. This study aimed to identify discrete trajectories of positive, negative and general psychopathological symptoms and functioning, determine predictors of the identified symptom trajectories and subsequently investigate the relationship between symptom and functioning trajectories over the 2-year follow-up period. Methods Data were extracted from the Singapore Early Psychosis Intervention Programme clinical database. Trajectories of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale over the two-year follow up were modelled using latent class growth curve modelling. Results Two distinct trajectories (early response and stable trajectory and delayed response trajectory) for positive symptoms, four distinct trajectories (early response and stable trajectory, early response and relapse trajectory, slower response and no response trajectory and delayed response trajectory) for negative and general psychopathology symptoms and three distinct trajectories for functioning (high functioning trajectory, moderately stable functioning trajectory and deterioration in functioning trajectory) were identified in our sample. Compared to individuals in the early response and stable trajectory, those in the delayed response trajectory for positive and negative symptoms, early response and relapse for negative and general psychopathology symptoms and slower response and no response trajectories for general psychopathology symptoms were significantly associated with higher odds of having deterioration in functioning over time. Poor symptom trajectories were also significantly predicted by younger age, male gender, unemployed and economically inactive status, lower education, longer duration of untreated psychosis and diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum and delusional disorders. Conclusions The results confirm that the symptoms trajectories among patients with FEP are heterogeneous and suggest that a small group of patients may be at higher risk of deterioration in symptom severity and functioning over the 2-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edimansyah Abdin
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
- * E-mail:
| | - Siow Ann Chong
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | | | - Chao Xu Peh
- Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | - Lye Yin Poon
- Department of Early Psychosis Intervention, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | - Sujatha Rao
- Department of Early Psychosis Intervention, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | - Swapna Verma
- Department of Early Psychosis Intervention, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Outcomes of psychotic disorders are associated with high personal, familiar, societal and clinical burden. There is thus an urgent clinical and societal need for improving those outcomes. Recent advances in research knowledge have opened new opportunities for ameliorating outcomes of psychosis during its early clinical stages. This paper critically reviews these opportunities, summarizing the state-of-the-art knowledge and focusing on recent discoveries and future avenues for first episode research and clinical interventions. Candidate targets for primary universal prevention of psychosis at the population level are discussed. Potentials offered by primary selective prevention in asymptomatic subgroups (stage 0) are presented. Achievements of primary selected prevention in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (stage 1) are summarized, along with challenges and limitations of its implementation in clinical practice. Early intervention and secondary prevention strategies at the time of a first episode of psychosis (stage 2) are critically discussed, with a particular focus on minimizing the duration of untreated psychosis, improving treatment response, increasing patients' satisfaction with treatment, reducing illicit substance abuse and preventing relapses. Early intervention and tertiary prevention strategies at the time of an incomplete recovery (stage 3) are further discussed, in particular with respect to addressing treatment resistance, improving well-being and social skills with reduction of burden on the family, treatment of comorbid substance use, and prevention of multiple relapses and disease progression. In conclusion, to improve outcomes of a complex, heterogeneous syndrome such as psychosis, it is necessary to globally adopt complex models integrating a clinical staging framework and coordinated specialty care programmes that offer pre-emptive interventions to high-risk groups identified across the early stages of the disorder. Only a systematic implementation of these models of care in the national health care systems will render these strategies accessible to the 23 million people worldwide suffering from the most severe psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Fusar‐Poli
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical Detection Lab, Department of Psychosis StudiesInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK,OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Patrick D. McGorry
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - John M. Kane
- Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA; Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Malla A, Joober R, Iyer S, Norman R, Schmitz N, Brown T, Lutgens D, Jarvis E, Margolese HC, Casacalenda N, Abdel‐Baki A, Latimer E, Mustafa S, Abadi S. Comparing three-year extension of early intervention service to regular care following two years of early intervention service in first-episode psychosis: a randomized single blind clinical trial. World Psychiatry 2017; 16:278-286. [PMID: 28941098 PMCID: PMC5608831 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to determine if, following two years of early intervention service for first-episode psychosis, three-year extension of that service was superior to three years of regular care. We conducted a randomized single blind clinical trial using an urn randomization balanced for gender and substance abuse. Participants were recruited from early intervention service clinics in Montreal. Patients (N=220), 18-35 years old, were randomized to an extension of early intervention service (EEIS; N=110) or to regular care (N=110). EEIS included case management, family intervention, cognitive behaviour therapy and crisis intervention, while regular care involved transfer to primary (community health and social services and family physicians) or secondary care (psychiatric outpatient clinics). Cumulative length of positive and negative symptom remission was the primary outcome measure. EEIS patients had a significantly longer mean length of remission of positive symptoms (92.5 vs. 63.6 weeks, t=4.47, p<0.001), negative symptoms (73.4 vs. 59.6 weeks, t=2.84, p=0.005) and both positive and negative symptoms (66.5 vs. 56.7 weeks, t=2.25, p=0.03) compared to regular care patients. EEIS patients stayed in treatment longer than regular care patients (mean 131.7 vs. 105.3 weeks, t=3.98, p<0.001 through contact with physicians; 134.8 ± 37.7 vs. 89.8 ± 55.2, t=6.45, p<0.0001 through contact with other health care providers) and received more units of treatment (mean 74.9 vs. 39.9, t=4.21, p<0.001 from physicians, and 57.3 vs. 28.2, t=4.08, p<0.001 from other health care professionals). Length of treatment had an independent effect on the length of remission of positive symptoms (t=2.62, p=0.009), while number of units of treatment by any health care provider had an effect on length of remission of negative symptoms (t=-2.70, p=0.008) as well as total symptoms (t=-2.40, p=0.02). Post-hoc analysis showed that patients randomized to primary care, based on their better clinical profile at randomization, maintained their better outcome, especially as to remission of negative symptoms, at the end of the study. These data suggest that extending early intervention service for three additional years has a positive impact on length of remission of positive and negative symptoms compared to regular care. This may have policy implications for extending early intervention services beyond the current two years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashok Malla
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada,Douglas Mental Health University InstituteMontrealQCCanada
| | - Ridha Joober
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada,Douglas Mental Health University InstituteMontrealQCCanada
| | - Srividya Iyer
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada,Douglas Mental Health University InstituteMontrealQCCanada
| | - Ross Norman
- Departments of Psychiatry and Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of Western Ontario, and London Health Sciences CentreLondonONCanada
| | - Norbert Schmitz
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada,Douglas Hospital Research CentreMontrealQCCanada
| | - Thomas Brown
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada,Douglas Hospital Research CentreMontrealQCCanada
| | - Danyael Lutgens
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada,Douglas Mental Health University InstituteMontrealQCCanada
| | - Eric Jarvis
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada,Jewish General HospitalMontrealQCCanada
| | - Howard C. Margolese
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada,McGill University Health CentreMontrealQCCanada
| | - Nicola Casacalenda
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada,Jewish General HospitalMontrealQCCanada
| | | | - Eric Latimer
- Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada,Douglas Hospital Research CentreMontrealQCCanada
| | - Sally Mustafa
- Douglas Mental Health University InstituteMontrealQCCanada
| | - Sherezad Abadi
- Douglas Mental Health University InstituteMontrealQCCanada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chang WC, Kwong VWY, Lau ESK, So HC, Wong CSM, Chan GHK, Jim OTT, Hui CLM, Chan SKW, Lee EHM, Chen EYH. Sustainability of treatment effect of a 3-year early intervention programme for first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2017; 211:37-44. [PMID: 28385705 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.117.198929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Revised: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BackgroundEvidence indicates that the positive effects of 2-year early intervention services for psychosis are not maintained after service withdrawal. Optimal duration of early intervention in sustaining initial improved outcomes remains to be determined.AimsTo examine the sustainability of the positive effects of an extended, 3-year, early intervention programme for patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) after transition to standard care.MethodA total of 160 patients, who had received a 2-year early intervention programme for FEP, were enrolled to a 12-month randomised-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01202357) comparing a 1-year extension of the early intervention (3-year specialised treatment) with step-down care (2-year specialised treatment). Participants were followed up and reassessed 2 and 3 years after inclusion to the trial.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the treatment groups in outcomes on functioning, symptom severity and service use during the post-trial follow-up period.ConclusionsThe therapeutic benefits achieved by the extended, 3-year early intervention were not sustainable after termination of the specialised service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wing Chung Chang
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Vivian Wing Yan Kwong
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Emily Sin Kei Lau
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Hon Cheong So
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Corine Sau Man Wong
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Gloria Hoi Kei Chan
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Olivia Tsz Ting Jim
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Christy Lai Ming Hui
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Sherry Kit Wa Chan
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Edwin Ho Ming Lee
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Eric Yu Hai Chen
- Wing Chung Chang, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Vivian Wing Yan Kwong, MPsyMed, Emily Sin Kei Lau, MSocSc(CP), Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Hon Cheong So, MBBS, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Corine Sau Man Wong MsocSc, Gloria Hoi Kei Chan, MSSc(CP), Olivia Tsz Ting Jim, BSocSc, Christy Lai Ming Hui, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Sherry Kit Wa Chan, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong; Edwin Ho Ming Lee, MRCPsych, FHKCPsych, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong; Eric Yu Hai Chen, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chang WC, Kwong VWY, Chan GHK, Jim OTT, Lau ESK, Hui CLM, Chan SKW, Lee EHM, Chen EYH. Prediction of motivational impairment: 12-month follow-up of the randomized-controlled trial on extended early intervention for first-episode psychosis. Eur Psychiatry 2017; 41:37-41. [PMID: 28049079 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2016] [Revised: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amotivation is prevalent in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients and is a major determinant of functional outcome. Prediction of amotivation in the early stage of psychosis, however, is under-studied. We aimed to prospectively examine predictors of amotivation in FEP patients in a randomized-controlled trial comparing a 1-year extension of early intervention (Extended EI, 3-year EI) with step-down psychiatric care (SC, 2-year EI). METHODS One hundred sixty Chinese patents were recruited from a specialized EI program for FEP in Hong Kong after they have completed this 2-year EI service, randomly allocated to Extended EI or SC, and followed up for 12 months. Assessments on premorbid adjustment, onset profiles, baseline symptom severity and treatment characteristics were conducted. Data analysis was based on 156 subjects who completed follow-up assessments. RESULTS Amotivation at 12-month follow-up was associated with premorbid adjustment, allocated treatment condition, and levels of positive symptoms, disorganization, amotivation, diminished expression (DE) and depression at study intake. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that Extended EI and lower levels of DE independently predicted better outcome on 12-month amotivation. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate a potentially critical therapeutic role of an extended specialized EI on alleviating motivational impairment in FEP patients. The longer-term effect of Extended EI on amotivation merits further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W C Chang
- Department of Psychiatry, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| | - V W Y Kwong
- Department of Psychiatry, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - G H K Chan
- Department of Psychiatry, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - O T T Jim
- Department of Psychiatry, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - E S K Lau
- Department of Psychiatry, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - C L M Hui
- Department of Psychiatry, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - S K W Chan
- Department of Psychiatry, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - E H M Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - E Y H Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, the University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Randall JR, Chateau D, Smith M, Taylor C, Bolton J, Katz L, Burland E, Katz A, Nickel NC, Enns J, Brownell M. An early intervention for psychosis and its effect on criminal accusations and suicidal behaviour using a matched-cohort design. Schizophr Res 2016; 176:307-311. [PMID: 27262385 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2016] [Revised: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early interventions for psychosis have been shown to reduce psychotic symptoms and hospital use for first-episode patients, but the effect on suicidal and criminal behaviour has not been reliably determined. This study aimed to examine whether an early intervention for psychosis program (EPPIS) reduced criminal behaviour, suicide attempts, and hospital-based service use. METHODS The study utilized administrative data to match clients of EPPIS to historical controls. Regression was used to determine the effect of treatment by EPPIS on inpatient use, emergency department use, suicide attempts/deaths, and criminal accusations. RESULTS A sample of 244 patients was matched to 449 controls. EPPIS patients had lower odds of being accused of a crime both during and after treatment. Suicidal behavior was less frequent among patients, both during treatment (p<0.0001) and after (HR=0.39; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94). During treatment there were more emergency department visits for the patients (RR=2.54; 95% CI: 1.56 to 4.58), but no difference in inpatient usage compared to controls. Post-treatment, both emergency department and inpatient usage were higher among patients. CONCLUSIONS EPPIS patients had reduced suicide attempts and criminal accusations. Increased emergency department use could indicate that encouraging treatment during a crisis may increase service use, while reducing suicidal and criminal behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason R Randall
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Dan Chateau
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
| | - Mark Smith
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Carole Taylor
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - James Bolton
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Canada
| | - Laurence Katz
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Canada
| | - Elaine Burland
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Alan Katz
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Nathan C Nickel
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Enns
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Marni Brownell
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|