Psychometric properties of the DSM-5 Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Psychosis‐Specific Intensive Outpatient Program

Objective

Intensive outpatient programs (IOPs) are rarely designed specifically to treat psychosis. In 2016 UCLA established the Thought Disorders Intensive Outpatient Program (TD IOP), combining a time‐limited, group‐based intervention called cognitive behavioral social skills training (CBSST) and medication management to treat individuals with psychosis. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of developing an IOP for individuals with psychosis and the effectiveness of the program in improving psychotic symptom severity.

Methods

Adults were referred to the TD IOP from inpatient and outpatient settings. Programming included 3 hours of CBSST and 6 hours of additional groups weekly as well as individual psychiatry and social work services. Primary outcomes were symptom changes as measured at intake and discharge by the Clinician‐Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity scale. Program feedback was solicited from a small subset of patients.

Results

Of the 92 enrolled subjects, 71 completed the program (77.2%). Average length of stay was 52 ± 30 days across all enrolled. Participants showed significant (p < 0.05) improvement with small‐moderate effect sizes across five of eight psychosis symptom domains (hallucinations, delusions, disorganized speech, depression, and mania). Patient‐reported program satisfaction was high (86.6 ± 12.7 score, range 0–100).

Conclusions

The current study indicates that targeted treatment for psychosis is successful within an IOP framework, with minimal additional training required for Master's level clinicians. Participants demonstrated significant symptomatic relief from group‐based, time‐limited treatment. Further work is needed to determine the full range of program benefits on patient well‐being and illness morbidity.

The creation of a psychosis‐specific intensive outpatient program (IOP) based on a manualized, evidence‐based treatment called Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training is feasible within an existing IOP framework and requires minimal additional training for Master's level clinicians.

Over the course of the 6‐week treatment program, participants demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) improvement in five of eight psychosis symptom domains as measured by the Clinician‐Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity scale.

Most participants (77.2%) completed the program and a subset of participants surveyed indicated high program satisfaction (86.6 score out of 100).

The Disease Recovery Evaluation and Modification (DREaM) study: Effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate versus oral antipsychotics in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder

We report primary results of the Disease Recovery Evaluation and Modification (DREaM) study, a randomized, open-label, delayed-start trial designed to compare the effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate (PP) versus oral antipsychotics (OAP) in delaying time to first treatment failure (TtFTF) in participants with recent-onset schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder. DREaM included: Part I, 2-month oral run-in; Part II, 9-month disease progression phase (PP or OAP); Part III, 9 months of additional treatment (PP/PP; OAP rerandomized: OAP/OAP or OAP/PP). PP/PP and OAP/OAP comprised the 18-month extended disease progression (EDP) analysis. A total of 235 participants were randomized to PP (n = 78) or OAP (n = 157) in Part II. No statistically significant differences in TF between treatment groups were identified during Part II (PP 29.5%, OAP 24.8%; P = 0.377), Part III (PP/PP 14.3%, OAP/PP 15.8%, OAP/OAP 28.6%; P = 0.067) or the EDP analysis (PP/PP 28.6%, OAP/OAP 44.4%; NNT = 6; P = 0.080). Using a modified definition of TF excluding treatment supplementation with another antipsychotic, a common approach to managing dose adjustments, significant differences were observed between treatment groups in Part III (PP/PP 4.1%, OAP/PP 14.0%, OAP/OAP 27.0%; P = 0.002) and EDP (PP/PP 14.3%, OAP/OAP 42.9%; P = 0.001). Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of PP. Although significant treatment differences were not observed during the first 9 months of DREaM, numerical differences favoring PP emerged in the last 9 months and significant differences were observed when TF criteria were limited to their most impactful components. These results highlight the potential benefit of initiating PP early in the course of schizophrenia and provide valuable insights for future clinical trials in recent-onset schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02431702.

The factor structure and clinical utility of clinician-rated dimensions of psychosis symptom severity in patients with recent-onset psychosis: Results of a 1-year longitudinal follow-up prospective cohort study

The classic subtype classification of schizophrenia has been removed, and DSM-5 now includes the Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity (CRDPSS). In the present study, a factor analysis of the CRDPSS was performed, and we assessed whether patient classification using the derived factor structure helps predict the clinical course. The participants were 390 patients with recent-onset psychosis enrolled in the Korean Early Psychosis Cohort Study (KEPS). Two factors were identified: psychotic (including delusions, hallucinations, disorganization, and abnormal psychomotor behavior) and negative-cognitive (including negative symptoms and impaired cognition). Patients were grouped based on the factor structure and changes in clinical course were monitored over 1 year. The negative-cognitive group demonstrated longer duration of untreated psychosis, earlier onset, and a higher rate of psychiatric comorbidities. Baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores were higher in psychotic group, but group differences were not observed after 2 months. Conversely, the PANSS negative scale score was significantly higher in negative-cognitive group throughout follow-up, and CGI-S score was reversed at 12 months. The findings indicate that the factor structure derived herein for the CRDPSS could be helpful for predicting the clinical course of recent-onset psychosis patients.

Comparison of three scales (BIS, SUMD and BCIS) for measuring insight dimensions and their evolution after one-year of follow-up: Findings from the FACE-SZ Cohort

The aim of our study was to compare the performance of three different instruments measuring clinical and cognitive dimensions of insight. Data on 182 outpatients with schizophrenia and one-year follow-up assessments was drawn from the FACE-SZ cohort. Awareness of clinical state (« clinical insight ») was measured using both a clinician-rated measure (the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD)), and a self-report measure (the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS). Cognitive insight was measured using a self-report measure (the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)). For each scale, change in insight was examined at the follow-up. Correlations between SUMD and BIS subscales measuring same dimensions were significant. BIS-BCIS correlations were weak for all combinations except between BIS illness dimension and BCIS composite score. At the follow-up, BIS and SUMD awareness of treatment need improved whereas illness and symptom awareness increased only on the SUMD. Conversely, cognitive insight composite scores decreased. Despite relatively good overall agreement between the two clinical insight instruments, considerable variability for similar insight dimensions measured by different instruments was found. Agreement between cognitive and clinical insight is moderate. Our study strengthens the argument that insight is harder to operationalize than other symptoms and may explain why it is so seldom explicitly targeted in schizophrenia treatment.

Validity and utility of a set of clinical criteria for cognitive impairment associated with psychosis (CIAPs)

Schizophrenia and other psychoses display a common profile of mild to moderate cognitive deficits that are associated with poor functional outcomes. Cognitive impairment is usually evaluated by neuropsychological assessment, and interview-based measures with good psychometric properties and high utility for clinical practice are now available. However, the extent to which a set of clinical criteria can be used as proxy measures of cognitive deficits in this population has not been tested. This study aimed to examine the empirical validity of a set of clinical criteria for cognitive impairment associated with psychosis (CIAPs). Ninety-eight patients with non-pure affective psychosis and 50 healthy-matched controls were included. The CIAPs criteria were empirically tested against antecedent, concurrent and outcome validators and by means of a neuropsychological evaluation based on MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The CIAPs criteria showed strong associations with outcomes and certain antecedent validators and moderate associations with concurrent validators. The CIAPs criteria achieved superior neuropsychological validity compared to current DSM 5 criteria for schizophrenia, the B-criterion of DSM 5 schizophrenia or a combination of both criteria. Cognitive impairment associated with psychosis can be clinically assessed and is a useful tool for clinical practice and predicting outcomes of schizophrenia and related psychosis.