Core clinical manifestations of clozapine-related DRESS syndrome: A network analysis

Antipsychotic-Related DRESS Syndrome: Analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database

INTRODUCTION

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is gaining attention in pharmacovigilance, but its association with antipsychotics, other than clozapine, is still unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a case/non-case study with disproportionality analysis based on the World Health Organization (WHO) global spontaneous reporting database, VigiBase®. We analyzed individual case safety reports of DRESS syndrome related to antipsychotics compared to (1) all other medications in VigiBase®, (2) carbamazepine (a known positive control), and (3) within classes (typical/atypical) of antipsychotics. We calculated reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian information component (IC), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Disproportionate reporting was prioritized based on clinical importance, according to predefined criteria. Additionally, we compared characteristics of patients reporting with serious/non-serious reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 1534 reports describing DRESS syndrome for 19 antipsychotics were identified. The ROR for antipsychotics as a class as compared to all other medications was 1.0 (95% CI 0.9-1.1). We found disproportionate reporting for clozapine (ROR 2.3, 95% CI 2.1-2.5; IC 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3), cyamemazine (ROR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.5; IC 1.2, 95% CI 0.5-1.7), and chlorpromazine (ROR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1; IC 0.6, 95% CI 0.1-1.0). We found 35.7% of cases with co-reported anticonvulsants, and 25% with multiple concurrent antipsychotics in serious compared to 8.6% in non-serious cases (p = 0.03). Fatal cases were 164 (10.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from the expected association with clozapine, chlorpromazine and cyamemazine (sharing an aromatic heteropolycyclic molecular structure) emerged with a higher-than-expected reporting of DRESS. Better knowledge of the antipsychotic-related DRESS syndrome should increase clinicians' awareness leading to safer prescribing of antipsychotics.

Slower clozapine titration than the official Japanese protocol led to fewer inflammatory adverse effects: A retrospective chart review of seven hospitals

BACKGROUND

Higher frequencies of inflammatory adverse effects of clozapine have been reported in Japan. As the international titration protocol for Asians has set slower dose titration than the Japanese package insert, we hypothesized that a dose titration speed slower than the recommendation of the guideline would be associated with fewer inflammatory-related adverse events.

METHODS

The medical records of all 272 patients who were first started on clozapine at seven hospitals between 2009 and 2023 were studied retrospectively. Of those, 241 were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups regarding whether the titration speed was faster or slower than the guideline for Asians. The incidence of inflammatory adverse events with clozapine was compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The frequency of inflammatory adverse events was 34 % (37/110) in the faster titration group and 13 % (17/131) in the slower titration group, and a significant difference was observed by Fisher exact test (odds ratio 3.38; 95 % confidence interval 1.71-6.91; p < 0.001). Serious adverse effects, fever for more than five days, and clozapine discontinuation were significantly more frequent in the faster titration group. Logistic regression analysis indicated significantly more inflammatory adverse events in the faster titration group (adjusted odds ratio 4.01; 95 % confidence interval 2.02-7.87; p < 0.001) considering age, sex, body mass index, concomitant valproic acid, and smoking as confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine-induced inflammatory adverse events were less frequent in Japanese individuals when a titration rate was more gradual than the protocol recommended in the Japanese package insert.

Clozapine-induced eosinophilia: A case report

Schizophrenia is a chronic neuropsychiatric illness defined by the appearance of positive, and negative symptoms and/or cognitive impairment. Antipsychotic drugs are predominantly used in the treatment of psychotic disorders, but not all patients with schizophrenia respond to every antipsychotic medication. Clozapine is one of the best atypical antipsychotics and is highly effective in treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Evidence suggests that clozapine appears to be effective in lowering the risk of suicide, extrapyramidal side effects, and relapse in patients with schizophrenia. Per contra, clozapine is not the first-line treatment due to its unalterable aftereffects such as agranulocytosis, metabolic syndrome, seizures, and rarely, eosinophilia. Eosinophilia can be life-threatening. Eosinophils infiltrate different tissues and cause inflammation in multiple organs causing end-organ damage. The current study aimed to report the incidence of eosinophilia associated with clozapine use in patients with schizophrenia. Literature on clozapine-induced eosinophilia is relatively scarce. Understanding the progression and management of clozapine-induced eosinophilia and its end-organ effects is imperative. While there is insufficient data about the guidelines in the management of clozapine-induced eosinophilia, this study contributes to understanding the patterns of the disease progression with clozapine dosage. A case study was done on a patient with schizophrenia and autistic spectrum disorder who was on clozapine. Data on how eosinophil levels varied with clozapine dosing was analyzed and documented. The evidence of clozapine dosage affecting eosinophil and C-reactive protein levels in this patient was summarized in a table and a narrative review.

Screening the European pharmacovigilance database for reports of clozapine-related DRESS syndrome: 47 novel cases

Clozapine-related drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare adverse reaction. We aimed to screen a large pharmacovigilance database to identify clozapine-related DRESS cases, even if otherwise reported and provide a clinical overview. We screened spontaneous reports of clozapine-related DRESS syndrome in EudraVigilance database applying the European Registry on Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (RegiSCAR) criteria and scores to identify probable/definite DRESS syndrome cases. Clinical and demographic characteristics of included cases were provided and associations between RegiSCAR scores, and time to develop/recover DRESS were assessed. In a total of 262,146 adverse drug reactions reports for 75,190 clozapine-treated patients, 596 cases fulfilled RegiSCAR criteria; ultimately, 51 cases were rated as probable/definite DRESS according to RegiSCAR scores, of which 4 were previously published as case reports. The mean age of patients was 41.06 years (43.1% females), with 13 patients (25.5%) receiving reported co-medication with other DRESS culprit drugs. Median time between clozapine initiation and DRESS symptoms was 25 days. Clozapine dose was associated with days to develop symptoms (Spearman's ρ 0.40, p = 0.03). Organ involvement was reported in all cases followed by fever (n = 49; 96.1%) and eosinophilia (n = 47; 92.2%). Treatment involved clozapine discontinuation for 37 patients (72.5%), while 3.9% (n = 2) of cases ended fatally. Clozapine rechallenge was undertaken in 25 patients (49.0%). The screening of the EudraVigilance database revealed 47 novel clozapine-related DRESS cases, and only one was originally reported as DRESS. Clozapine-related DRESS may occur with clozapine monotherapy not only during dose titration, but also during maintenance treatment.