Low mobility of CuO and TiO2 nanoparticles in agricultural soils of contrasting texture and organic matter content

Uptake, Translocation, Toxicity, and Impact of Nanoparticles on Plant Physiological Processes

The application of nanotechnology in agriculture has increased rapidly. However, the fate and effects of various nanoparticles on the soil, plants, and humans are not fully understood. Reports indicate that nanoparticles exhibit positive and negative impacts on biota due to their size, surface property, concentration within the system, and species or cell type under test. In plants, nanoparticles are translocated either by apoplast or symplast pathway or both. Also, it is not clear whether the nanoparticles entering the plant system remain as nanoparticles or are biotransformed into ionic forms or other organic compounds. Controversial results on the toxicity effects of nanomaterials on the plant system are available. In general, the nanomaterial toxicity was exerted by producing reactive oxygen species, leading to damage or denaturation of various biomolecules. The intensity of cyto- and geno-toxicity depends on the physical and chemical properties of nanoparticles. Based on the literature survey, it is observed that the effects of nanoparticles on the growth, photosynthesis, and primary and secondary metabolism of plants are both positive and negative; the response of these processes to the nanoparticle was associated with the type of nanoparticle, the concentration within the tissue, crop species, and stage of growth. Future studies should focus on addressing the key knowledge gaps in understanding the responses of plants to nanoparticles at all levels through global transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome assays and evaluating nanoparticles under field conditions at realistic exposure concentrations to determine the level of entry of nanoparticles into the food chain and assess the impact of nanoparticles on the ecosystem.

A comparative proteomics study of Arabidopsis thaliana responding to the coexistence of BPA and TiO2-NPs at environmentally relevant concentrations

Through the applications of recycling sewage sludge to soils as nutrients, bisphenol A (BPA) and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) are commonly found in the agricultural environment. Previous studies have reported that BPA and nanoparticles are harmful to the environment. However, the combined toxicity of both compounds is not yet understood. This work presented an in-depth proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to BPA and TiO2-NPs concurrently at environmentally relevant levels. Seeds were simultaneously treated with varying concentrations of BPA (0, 10, 100, and 1000 µg·kg-1) and TiO2-NPs (0, 1, 10 and 100 mg·kg-1). In treatment of 1000 µg·kg-1 BPA and 100 mg·kg-1 TiO2-NPs, highest seed germination rate (87.97%, p < 0.05) was observed. Shorter primary roots but more branched roots were obtained in treatments of high BPA and NPs concentrations (100, 1000 µg·kg-1 BPA and 10, 100 mg·kg-1 TiO2-NPs) while no significant effects on plant height and biomass were found. In the comparative analysis, both concentration related positive and negative effects were observed, such as regulation of cell proliferation (positive), root hair elongation (positive), cellular response to oxidative stress (negative), and cell wall organization (negative). In response to the stress caused by BPA and TiO2-NPs, some proteins related to plant root development, such as CD48E, DNAJ2 and GL24, were up-regulated explaining the shorter primary root length and more branched roots. Moreover, Arabidopsis may have stimulated its ability of resource transportation and energy metabolism to overcome the stress and maintain or somehow enhance their growth by up-regulating proteins like TBB6, CALM1, RAA2A, G3PP2 and KASC1. Our comparative proteomics analysis also highlighted multiple biological processes that consequently lead to the stability of plant growth and its stress adaptation. The results demonstrated that applying biosolids to soil as a fertilizer may be considered as a sustainable practice.

Enhancing Agrichemical Delivery and Plant Development with Biopolymer-Based Stimuli Responsive Core-Shell Nanostructures

The inefficient delivery of agrichemicals in agrifood systems is among the leading cause of serious negative planetary and public health impacts. Such inefficiency is mainly attributed to the inability to deliver the agrichemicals at the right place (target), right time, and right dose. In this study, scalable, biodegradable, sustainable, biopolymer-based multistimuli responsive core-shell nanostructures were developed for smart agrichemical delivery. Three types of responsive core/shell nanostructures incorporated with model agrichemicals (i.e., CuSO₄ and NPK fertilizer) were synthesized by coaxial electrospray, and the resulting nanostructures showed spherical morphology with an average diameter about 160 nm. Tunable agrichemical release kinetics were achieved by controlling the surface hydrophobicity of nanostructures. The pH and enzyme responsiveness was also demonstrated by the model analyte release kinetics (up to 7 days) in aqueous solution. Finally, the efficacy of the stimuli responsive nanostructures was evaluated in soil-based greenhouse studies using soybean and wheat in terms of photosynthesis efficacy and linear electron flow (LEF), two important metrics for seedling development and health. Findings confirmed plant specificity; for soybean, the nanostructures resulted in 34.3% higher value of relative chlorophyll content and 41.2% higher value of PS1 centers in photosystem I than the ionic control with equivalent agrichemical concentration. For wheat, the nanostructures resulted in 37.6% higher value of LEF than the ionic agrichemicals applied at 4 times higher concentration, indicating that the responsive core-shell nanostructure is an effective platform to achieve precision agrichemical delivery while minimizing inputs. Moreover, the Zn and Na content in the leaves of 4-week-old soybean seedlings were significantly increased with nanostructure amendment, indicating that the developed nanostructures can potentially be used to modulate the accumulation of other important micronutrients through a potential biofortification strategy.

Silver Nanoparticle's Toxicological Effects and Phytoremediation

The advancement in nanotechnology has brought numerous benefits for humans in diverse areas including industry, medicine, and agriculture. The demand in the application of nanomaterials can result in the release of these anthropogenic materials into soil and water that can potentially harm the environment by affecting water and soil properties (e.g., soil texture, pH, organic matter, and water content), plants, animals, and subsequently human health. The properties of nanoparticles including their size, surface area, and reactivity affect their fate in the environment and can potentially result in their toxicological effects in the ecosystem and on living organisms. There is extensive research on the application of nano-based materials and the consequences of their release into the environment. However, there is little information about environmentally friendly approaches for removing nanomaterials from the environment. This article provides insight into the application of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), as one of the most commonly used nanomaterials, their toxicological effects, their impacts on plants and microorganisms, and briefly reviews the possibility of remediation of these metabolites using phytotechnology approaches. This article provides invaluable information to better understand the fate of nanomaterials in the environment and strategies in removing them from the environment.