Comparative cancer risk associated with methotrexate, other non-biologic and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

[Low-dose methotrexate: Indications and side effects, particularly in cases of diffuse interstitial pneumonia]

INTRODUCTION

Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate antagonist used as an immunosuppressant in a number of conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Low-dose MTX (MTX-LD) is associated with a risk of haematological, hepatic, gastrointestinal and pulmonary toxicity, which may up until now have limited its use.

STATE OF THE ART

In RA, data from retrospective cohorts have reported a possible excess risk of methotrexate toxicity in cases of underlying interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, recent prospective and retrospective multicentre studies have found no such increased risk, and have reassuringly concluded that MTX-LD can be prescribed in cases of RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD).

PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSIONS

Current recommendations are not to delay the introduction of MTX in patients with RA at risk of developing ILD or in the presence of RA-ILD with mild to moderate respiratory impairment.

A narrative review of the comparative safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DMARDs are classified into three categories: conventional synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs (including biosimilars), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. DMARDs, by way of their effect on the immune system, are associated with increased risk of adverse events, including infections, malignancies, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal perforations, and other less common events.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative literature review performed with searches of the PubMed database from 1 January 2010 through 1 January 2023, we compare the risk of safety events between DMARDs using data from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

DMARD use in RA is associated with higher rates of serious infections, tuberculosis reactivation, opportunistic infections, and possibly malignancies. Specific biologic DMARDs and higher doses are associated with elevated risks of various adverse events (gastrointestinal perforations, thromboembolism, serious infection). Shared decision-making is paramount when choosing a treatment regimen for patients based on their own comorbidities. JAKi are the newest class of medications used for RA with robust safety data provided in clinical trials. However, more real-world evidence and phase-IV pharmacovigilance data are needed to better understand comparative safety profile of DMARDs in RA.

Abatacept and non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive evaluation of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) risk associated with abatacept treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

This evaluation included 16 abatacept RA clinical trials and 6 observational studies. NMSC incidence rates (IRs)/1000 patient-years (p-y) of exposure were compared between patients treated with abatacept versus placebo, conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other biological/targeted synthetic (b/ts)DMARDs. For observational studies, a random-effects model was used to pool rate ratios (RRs).

RESULTS

~49 000 patients receiving abatacept were analysed from clinical trials (~7000) and observational studies (~42 000). In randomised trials (n=4138; median abatacept exposure, 12 (range 2-30) months), NMSC IRs (95% CIs) were not significantly different for abatacept (6.0 (3.3 to 10.0)) and placebo (4.0 (1.3 to 9.3)) and remained stable throughout the long-term, open-label period (median cumulative exposure, 28 (range 2-130 months); 21 335 p-y of exposure (7044 patients over 3 years)). For registry databases, NMSC IRs/1000 p-y were 5-12 (abatacept), 1.6-10 (csDMARDs) and 3-8 (other b/tsDMARDs). Claims database IRs were 19-22 (abatacept), 15-18 (csDMARDs) and 14-17 (other b/tsDMARDs). Pooled RRs (95% CIs) from observational studies for NMSC in patients receiving abatacept were 1.84 (1.00 to 3.37) vs csDMARDs and 1.11 (0.98 to 1.26) vs other b/tsDMARDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with the warnings and precautions of the abatacept label, this analysis suggests a potential increase in NMSC risk with abatacept use compared with csDMARDs. No significant increase was observed compared with b/tsDMARDs, but the lower limit of the 95% CI was close to unity.

Co-Occurrence of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Lung Cancer-Coincidence or Not?

Bronchopulmonary cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths globally. Rheumatoid arthritis is one of the risk factors for lung cancer, and those who use methotrexate have a higher risk of developing lung cancer. We present the case of an 80-year-old patient who is a former smoker and is known to have rheumatoid arthritis, being treated using methotrexate; they were brought by ambulance to the emergency room for coughing with ineffective expectoration, dyspnea on slight exertion, and right-lateral chest pain with onset about one month prior and progressive worsening. Imaging showed a 7 cm/6 cm LID tumorous lung formation with parietal invasion and C7 rib lysis, as well as diffuse fibrotic interstitial changes predominantly in the lower lobes. An ultrasound-guided transthoracic lung biopsy was performed, and histopathological examination established the diagnosis of invasive squamous cell lung carcinoma, G2. In conclusion, the chest pain interpreted by the patient as rheumatic pain delayed the diagnosis of lung cancer; the patient presented rather late to the hospital once respiratory failure set in.

Large-scale real-world data analyses of cancer risks among patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects 24.5 million people worldwide and has been associated with increased cancer risks. However, the extent to which the observed risks are related to the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis or its treatments is unknown. Leveraging nationwide health insurance claims data with 85.97 million enrollees across 8 years, we identified 92 864 patients without cancers at the time of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses. We matched 68 415 of these patients with participants without rheumatoid arthritis by sex, race, age and inferred health and economic status and compared their risks of developing all cancer types. By 12 months after the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis patients were 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] [1.14, 1.29]) times more likely to develop any cancer compared with matched enrollees without rheumatoid arthritis. In particular, the risk of developing lymphoma is 2.08 (95% CI [1.67, 2.58]) times higher in the rheumatoid arthritis group, and the risk of developing lung cancer is 1.69 (95% CI [1.32, 2.13]) times higher. We further identified the five most commonly used drugs in treating rheumatoid arthritis, and the log-rank test showed none of them is implicated with a significantly increased cancer risk compared with rheumatoid arthritis patients without that specific drug. Our study suggested that the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis, rather than its treatments, is implicated in the development of subsequent cancers. Our method is extensible to investigating the connections among drugs, diseases and comorbidities at scale.

Systemic Inflammatory Disorders, Immunosuppressive Treatment and Increase Risk of Head and Neck Cancers-A Narrative Review of Potential Physiopathological and Biological Mechanisms

Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are known to present multiple factors likely to influence their development. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current scientific literature on the interplay between systemic inflammatory disorders, immunosuppressive treatments and their synergistic effect on HNC risk. Both cell-mediated and humoral-mediated systemic inflammatory disorders involve dysregulated immune responses and chronic inflammation and these inflammatory conditions have been associated with an increased risk of HNC development, primarily in the head and neck region. Likewise, the interaction between systemic inflammatory disorders and immunosuppressive treatments appears to amplify the risk of HNC development, as chronic inflammation fosters a tumor-promoting microenvironment, while immunosuppressive therapies further compromise immune surveillance and anti-tumor immune responses. Understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying this interaction is crucial for developing targeted prevention strategies and therapeutic interventions. Additionally, the emerging field of immunotherapy provides potential avenues for managing HNCs associated with systemic inflammatory disorders, but further research is needed to determine its efficacy and safety in this specific context. Future studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and optimize preventive strategies and therapeutic interventions.

Hematologic Malignancy Risk in Inflammatory Arthritis Patients Treated with TNF Inhibitors: The Real-Life Data from the HUR-BIO Registry

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the incidence of hematologic malignancy (HM) among inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) compared with the general Turkish population.

METHODS

HUR-BIO (Hacettepe University Rheumatology Biologic Registry) is a single-center biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) registry since 2005. Patients with IA, including rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, or psoriatic arthritis who had at least one visit after the TNFi were screened from 2005 to November 2021. Standardized incidence rates (SIR) were calculated after adjustment for age and gender and compared with the 2017 Turkish National Cancer Registry (TNCR).

RESULTS

Of the 6139 patients registered in the HUR-BIO, 5355 used any TNFi at least once. The median follow-up duration was 2.6 years for patients receiving TNFi. Thirteen patients developed a HM on follow-up. In these patients, the median age at the IA onset was 38 (range, 26-67), and the median age at the HM diagnosis was 55.5 (range, 38-76). Patients using TNFi had an increased HM incidence (SIR 4.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.35-7.05). Ten patients with HM were under 65 years of age. In this group, there was a higher incidence of HM in both men (SIR 5.15, 95% CI 1.88-11.43) and women (SIR 4.76, 95% CI 1.74-10.55).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of HMs in inflammatory arthritis patients receiving TNFi was four times higher than in the general Turkish population.

Malignancies and rheumatoid arthritis, csDMARDs, biological DMARDs, and JAK inhibitors: challenge and outlook

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disorder necessitating immunosuppressive therapy. Remarkable progress has been made in the treatment of RA over recent decades, particularly with the development of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Nonetheless, the development of new drugs has been accompanied by concerns regarding the association between these novel therapies and the risk of malignancy.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review aims to discuss the understanding of RA, conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs, bDMARDs, JAKi, and their association with malignancy. Furthermore, the review discusses the management of malignancy in patients receiving b/tsDMARDs.

EXPERT OPINION

Although recent studies suggest that the potential risk of malignancy of methotrexate and a JAKi tofacitinib, it is essential to avoid indiscriminate withholding of treatment by those agents, as this may lead functional impairment and increased mortality. Therefore, the adoption of a Treat-to-Target (T2T) approach considering individual patient characteristics, becomes of utmost importance. Rheumatologists should maintain a vigilant stance regarding malignancy in this context, recognizing the importance of early detection and management. Implementing a screening program for malignancies is indispensable, and the use of computed tomography screening may enhance the effectiveness of management strategies.

Use of Systemic Therapies for Treatment of Psoriasis in Patients with a History of Treated Solid Tumours: Inference-Based Guidance from a Multidisciplinary Expert Panel

BACKGROUND

Patients with treated solid tumours (TSTs) are a highly heterogeneous population at an increased risk for malignancy compared with the general population. When treating psoriasis in patients with a history of TSTs, clinicians are concerned about the immunosuppressive nature of psoriasis therapies, the possibility of augmenting cancer recurrence/progression, and infectious complications. No direct, high-level evidence exists to address these concerns.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to provide a structured framework supporting healthcare professional and patient discussions on the risks and benefits of systemic psoriasis therapy in patients with previously TSTs. Our goal was to address the clinically important question, "In patients with TSTs, does therapy with systemic agents used for psoriasis increase the risk of malignancy or malignancy recurrence?"

METHODS

We implemented an inference-based approach relying on indirect evidence when direct clinical trial and real-world data were absent. We reviewed indirect evidence supporting inferences on the status of immune function in patients with TSTs. Recommendations on systemic psoriasis therapies in patients with TSTs were derived using an inferential heuristic.

RESULTS

We identified five indirect indicators of iatrogenic immunosuppression informed by largely independent bodies of evidence: (1) overall survival, (2) rate of malignancies with psoriasis and systemic psoriasis therapies, (3) rate of infections with psoriasis and systemic psoriasis therapies, (4) common disease biochemical pathways for solid tumours and systemic psoriasis therapies, and (5) solid organ transplant outcomes. On the basis of review of the totality of this data, we provided inference-based conclusions and ascribed level of support for each statement.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior to considering new therapies for psoriasis, an understanding of cancer prognosis should be addressed. Patients with TSTs and a good cancer prognosis will have similar outcomes to non-TST patients when treated with systemic psoriasis therapies. For patients with TSTs and a poor cancer prognosis, the quality-of-life benefits of treating psoriasis may outweigh the theoretical risks.

Malignancies in systemic rheumatic diseases: A mini review

There is an increased risk of malignancies in patients with many systemic rheumatic diseases, which negatively impact on their quality of life. The risk and types of malignancies can differ by the type of rheumatic diseases. Possible mechanisms linking them are dynamic and complicated, including chronic inflammation and damage in rheumatic disease, inability to clear oncogenic infections, shared etiology and some anti-rheumatic therapies. Although certain disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been proved to be potentially carcinogenic, the majority of them were not associated with increased risk of most malignancies in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases.

Cancer risks in rheumatoid arthritis patients who received immunosuppressive therapies: Will immunosuppressants work?

Background

Exploring the cancer risks of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) can help detect, evaluate, and treat malignancies at an early stage for these patients. Thus, a comprehensive analysis was conducted to determine the cancer risk of RA patients using different types of DMARDs and analyze their relationship with tumor mutational burdens (TMBs) reflecting immunogenicity.

Methods

A thorough search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Medline was conducted up to 20 August 2022. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were constructed with a random-effect model to determine risks for different types of malignancies in comparison with the general population. We also analyzed the correlation between SIRs and TMBs using linear regression (LR).

Results

From a total of 22 studies, data on 371,311 RA patients receiving different types of DMARDs, 36 kinds of malignancies, and four regions were available. Overall cancer risks were 1.15 (SIR 1.15; 1.09-1.22; p < 0.001) and 0.91 (SIR 0.91; 0.72-1.14; p = 0.402) in RA populations using conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), respectively. RA patients taking csDMARDs displayed a 1.77-fold lung cancer risk (SIR 1.77; 1.50-2.09; p < 0.001), a 2.15-fold lymphoma risk (SIR 2.15; 1.78-2.59; p < 0.001), and a 1.72-fold melanoma risk (SIR 1.72; 1.26-2.36; p = 0.001). Correlation coefficients between TMBs and SIRs were 0.22 and 0.29 from those taking csDMARDs and bDMARDs, respectively.

Conclusion

We demonstrated a cancer risk spectrum of RA populations using DMARDs. Additionally, TMBs were not associated with elevated cancer risks in RA patients following immunosuppressive therapy, which confirmed that iatrogenic immunosuppression might not increase cancer risks in patients with RA.

Interpretation

Changes were similar in cancer risk after different immunosuppressive treatments, and there was a lack of correlation between SIRs and TMBs. These suggest that we should look for causes of increased risks from the RA disease itself, rather than using different types of DMARDs.

Exploring the molecular mechanisms and shared gene signatures between rheumatoid arthritis and diffuse large B cell lymphoma

The relationship between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is well characterized, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this association have not been clearly investigated. Our study aimed to identify shared gene signatures and molecular mechanisms between RA and DLBCL. We selected multiple Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets (GSE93272, GSE83632, GSE12453, GSE1919) to obtain gene expression levels and clinical information about patients with RA and DLBCL. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to research co-expression networks associated with RA and DLBCL. Subsequently, we performed enrichment analysis of shared genes and screened the most significant core genes. We observed expression of the screened target gene, galectin 2 (LGALS2), in DLBCL patients and its impact on patient prognosis. Finally, we analyzed the molecular functional mechanism of LGALS2 and observed its relationship with the immune response in DLBCL using single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA). WGCNA recognized two major modules for RA and DLBCL, respectively. Shared genes (551) were identified for RA and DLBCL by observing the intersection. In addition, a critical shared gene, LGALS2, was acquired in the validation tests. Next, we found that the expression level of LGALS2 gradually decreased with tumor progression in DLBCL and that increased expression of LGALS2 predicted a better prognosis for DLBCL patients. ssGSEA revealed that LGALS2 is involved in immune-related pathways and has a significant regulatory effect on human immune responses. Additionally, we observed that LGALS2 is closely related to the sensitivity of multiple chemotherapeutic drugs. There is extremely little research on the molecular mechanism of correlation between RA and DLBCL. Our study identified that LGALS2 is a potential therapeutic target and an immune-related biomarker for patients with RA and DLBCL.

Potential of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs to Limit Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth

Inflammation is strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). This review examined the potential role of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) as repurposed drugs for treating AAA. Published evidence from clinical and preclinical studies was examined. Findings from animal models suggested that a deficiency or inhibition of tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (standard mean difference (SMD): −8.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): −9.92, −6.82), interleukin (IL)-6 (SMD: −1.44, 95% CI: −2.85, −0.04) and IL-17 (SMD: −3.36, 95% CI: −4.21, −2.50) led to a significantly smaller AAA diameter compared to controls. Human AAA tissue samples had significantly increased TNF-α (SMD: 1.68, 95% CI: 0.87, 2.49), IL-1β (SMD: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.79), IL-6 (SMD: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.79, 3.33) and IL-17 (SMD: 6.28, 95% CI: 3.57, 8.99) levels compared to non-AAA controls. In human serum, TNF-α (SMD: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.97) and IL-6 (SMD: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.92) levels were significantly elevated compared to non-AAA controls. These findings implicate TNF-α, IL-17 and IL-6 in AAA pathogenesis. Randomised controlled trials testing the value of bDMARDs in limiting AAA growth may be warranted.

[Management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases during and after malignancies]

The management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in patients with a simultaneous or previous malignant disease is associated with complex questions. Difficulties and possible solutions in the interpretation of meaningful studies are presented. Recommendations in guidelines on this topic are discussed. National registries and health insurance databases were examined with respect to the risk of tumor recurrence under disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; however, these analyses mainly refer to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and rituximab. Data on tumor incidence and, if available, risk of tumor recurrence are summarized for commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Finally, an attempt is made to formulate proposals for rheumatological treatment in patients with a history of malignancy.

Myelodysplastic syndrome and autoimmune disorders: two sides of the same coin?

Systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases and myelodysplastic syndromes have been linked in individual patients and in larger case series for at least 25 years. These associations frequently include thyroid disease, neutrophilic dermatoses, polyarthritis, connective tissue diseases, vasculitis, and autoimmune cytopenias. Studies have found that autoimmune disease (or its therapy) is a risk factor for the development of myelodysplastic syndromes, but such syndromes might also be an instigator of autoimmune disease. Epidemiological studies examining disease risk in myelodysplastic syndromes with and without comorbid autoimmune illness have reached mixed conclusions. The pathophysiology of myelodysplastic syndromes is tightly linked to excessive inflammatory activity in the bone marrow microenvironment, which could promote systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases directly or by stimulation of the adaptive immune response. Alternatively, autoimmune diseases could promote clonal evolution and disordered bone marrow growth, promoting the development of myeloid malignancy. Additionally, therapy-related myeloid neoplasms-including myelodysplastic syndromes-have been diagnosed after treatment of autoimmune diseases with immunosuppressant therapies. These associations raise the following question: are myelodysplastic syndromes and systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases two sides of the same coin-that is, do they share an underlying disease state that can manifest as a myeloid neoplasm, an autoinflammatory illness, or both? VEXAS syndrome, which was first reported in 2020, is caused by a mutation that affects myeloid-restricted cells and manifests with both myelodysplasia and autoinflammation, and could give insight into this biological possibility. We note that systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases are often steroid-dependent; however, studies have also evaluated the roles of other immunomodulating therapies. In this Viewpoint, we critically appraise and review the literature on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases that are associated with myelodysplastic syndromes and related diseases.

Cancer in Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody-Associated Vasculitis and Polyarteritis Nodosa in Australia: A Population-Based Study

Objective

The study objective was to compare incident cancer rates among patients with anti‐neutrophil cytoplasm antibody‐associated vasculitis (AAV) and polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) in Western Australia (WA) with the general population and perform time‐varying analyses to identify periods with greatest excess cancers.

Methods

Administrative health data from patients hospitalized with incident AAV/PAN from 1980 to 2014 were linked to the WA cancer registry, which holds compulsorily reported cancer data (excluding skin squamous cell and basal cell carcinomas). Incident cancer rates in patients with AAV/PAN were compared with age‐, sex‐, and calendar‐year‐matched WA population rates.

Results

Patients with AAV/PAN had higher overall rates of incident cancer compared with the matched population (standardized incidence ratio [SIR], 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42‐2.10). In subgroup analyses, incident cancer rates in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis/eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis were approximately double the general population (SIR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.73‐2.78) but similar to the general population in patients with microscopic polyangiitis/PAN (SIR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.85‐1.68). Patients with AAV/PAN had higher rates of genitourinary, skin, hematological, and lung cancers. Excess rates of hematological and lung cancers peaked early after diagnosis, whereas excess skin and genitourinary cancer rates peaked at 5 and 10 years, respectively.

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of long‐term cancer surveillance in patients with AAV/PAN and defines time frames of excess risk for specific cancers, which may help inform guidance on cancer screening. Furthermore, it indicates the need for skin surveillance for melanoma in addition to nonmelanoma skin cancers in patients who have greater environmental ultraviolet exposure, such as in Australia.

Risk of non-melanoma skin cancer with biological therapy in common inflammatory diseases: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Most previous studies compared the risk for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in biologic-treated common inflammatory diseases with the general population. Whether the increased NMSC risk is caused by the disease itself, the biologics, or both remains unknown.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to May 2021. Studies were included if they assessed the risk of NMSC for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or psoriasis patients treated with biologics compared with patients not receiving biologics. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

The current meta-analysis included 12 studies. Compared with patients with the inflammatory disease without biologics, patients receiving biological therapy were associated with an increased risk for NMSC (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.37), especially in patients with RA (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.36) and psoriasis (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.52), but not in patients with IBD (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.46 to 4.91). The risks for squamous cell skin cancer and basal cell skin cancer were both increased for patients receiving biologics. However, the risk of NMSC did not increase in patients treated with biologics less than 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that increased risk of NMSC was identified in RA and psoriasis treated with biologics compared with patients not receiving biologics, but not in patients with IBD. The inner cause for the increased risk of NMSC in IBD patients should be further discussed.

Weak Interactions of the Isomers of Phototrexate and Two Cavitand Derivatives

The interactions of two conformers of newly synthesized photoswitchable azobenzene analogue of methotrexate, called Phototrexate, with two cavitand derivatives, have been investigated in dimethyl sulfoxide medium. Photoluminescence methods have been applied to determine the complex stabilities and the related enthalpy and entropy changes associated to the complex formation around room temperature. Results show opposite temperature dependence of complex stabilities. The structure of the upper rims of the host molecules and the reordered solvent structure were identified as the background of the opposite tendencies of temperature dependence at molecular level. These results can support the therapeutic application of the photoswitchable phototrexate, because the formation of inclusion complexes is a promising method to regulate the pharmacokinetics of drug molecules.

Pharmacotherapy for Behçet's Disease and the Risk of Malignancy

Background: Behçet’s disease (BD) is associated with an increased risk of cancer. Few reports have been published on the relationship between drug exposure and the risk of cancer in patients with BD. Herein, we explored the relationship between pharmacologic interventions for BD and the risk of cancer.

Methods: we carried out a retrospective nested case-control study in a cohort of BD patients from attending our institution. Among 1,148 patients, 22 cancer patients were individually 1:2 matched to 44 cancer-free controls. The following biochemical indicators were evaluated: routine blood analysis, liver and kidney function tests, inflammatory indexes, blood gas analysis, blood electrolyte and previous pharmacologic interventions to manage BD including systemic glucocorticoids, methotrexate, cyclosporine-A, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (CYC), and thalidomide, which are considered the primary medicines used for the management of BD.

Results: Among the 22 BD patients with cancers, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (22.72%) was the most common type. Furthermore, CYC administration was significantly higher in BD patients with cancer compared with the cancer-free matched control group. Further, we observed that complement 4 (C4) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.001–0.065) and hemoglobin (Hb) (OR = 0.891, 95% CI: 0.795–0.998) levels were independent protective factors for predicting cancer risk in BD patients on multivariate analyses.

Conclusion: Our study revealed that CYC was associated with a high risk of cancer in BD patients. Furthermore, C4 and Hb are independent protective factors for oncogenesis in BD patients. These findings may provide references and suggestions for clinicians to select appropriate treatments and for the early recognition of high-risk patients to reduce cancer incidence in BD patients.

Impact of rheumatoid arthritis and biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic agents on cancer risk and recurrence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several new therapeutic drugs are now available for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Given that RA has been associated with an increased risk of certain cancers like lymphoma and lung cancer, concern remains about the safety of (newer) immunosuppressants used in RA management as it relates to the risk of cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have not observed an association between TNFi and risk of incident cancer. Studies of non-TNFi biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs and cancer are also reassuring but limited and of short-term follow-up. Regarding the use of DMARDs in patients with RA and a prior malignancy, retrospective studies have shown that TNFi use is not associated with recurrence.

SUMMARY

There is a need for ongoing studies on the safety of non-TNFi bDMARDs and targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and recurrent cancer. Further research is also needed to guide the patients, rheumatologists, and oncologists regarding the safest DMARDs to choose for patients with RA and a recent diagnosis of cancer.

Risk of malignancies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who used thiopurines as compared with other indications: a territory-wide study

AIMS

Thiopurines are believed to increase cancer risks, but data from Asian patients are sparse. We determined the risks of malignancies in thiopurine users with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or other indications from Hong Kong.

METHODS

All patients who had received thiopurines between 2005 and 2009 in Hong Kong were identified from local electronic healthcare database. Patients were followed from the start date of thiopurines until death or end of study in 2017. We excluded patients with baseline malignancy. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of all malignancies were computed against matched local general population from the cancer registry. Patients in the same diagnosis category but not exposed to thiopurines were included as controls.

RESULTS

There were 7452 thiopurines users (median age 47.0 years), including 595 IBD patients, with a median follow-up of 11.2 years. Of them, 684 (9.2%) developed malignancies with an overall SIR of 2.30 (95% CI 2.13-2.48). The SIR in IBD patients who used thiopurines was 2.37 (95% CI 1.71-3.18) as compared with non-users (SIR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.72). Highest risk of malignancies was observed in post-transplant patients (SIR 3.83, 95% CI 3.34-4.35), and lower risks were seen in patients with rheumatological diseases (SIR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.02).

CONCLUSION

IBD patients in Hong Kong who used thiopurines had 2.37-fold increase in risk of malignancies than the general population, which was higher than non-users and different from thiopurine users for other indications.

Adverse Effects of Low-Dose Methotrexate in a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial: Adjudicated Hematologic and Skin Cancer Outcomes in the Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial

Objective

Low‐dose methotrexate (LD‐MTX), a cornerstone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, is associated with a moderately increased risk of anemia, leukopenia, and skin cancers, but the risks of myelosuppression and malignancy during LD‐MTX use remain incompletely described. We examined the risks of cytopenias and skin cancers among patients taking LD‐MTX versus placebo in a large randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Methods

We prespecified secondary analyses of a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled RCT that included adults with known cardiovascular disease and diabetes or metabolic syndrome in the United States and Canada. Subjects were randomly allocated to LD‐MTX (20 mg/week maximum) or placebo. All subjects received folic acid (1 mg daily for 6days/week). We assessed the frequency of blindly adjudicated hematologic and malignant adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 2391 subjects were randomized to LD‐MTX (mean dosage 14.9 mg/week), and 2395 were randomized to placebo. During follow‐up, in the LD‐MTX arm, simultaneous two‐line cytopenias (n = 92 [3.9%]) or pancytopenia (n = 13 [0.54%]) were infrequent. Pancytopenia developed as soon as 4 months and as late as 3.5 years after beginning LD‐MTX, though the latter subject had been recently diagnosed with multiple myeloma. Overall skin cancer risk was increased in users of LD‐MTX compared with users of placebo, which driven largely by a statistically significant increased risk of squamous cell skin cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 3.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63‐6.71). Melanoma was increased in LD‐MTX, but this was not statistically significant (HR 2.33; 95% CI 0.60‐9.01).

Conclusions

Among subjects using LD‐MTX, simultaneous two‐line cytopenias and pancytopenia were uncommon. We found more cases of skin cancer, particularly squamous cell carcinomas, in the LD‐MTX arm than the placebo arm.

Neoplasm Risk in Rheumatic Diseases Has No Correlation With Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs Usage-A Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study

Objectives: To investigate whether there is an elevated neoplasm risk in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Methods: A population-based nested case-control study was performed by retrieving all patients newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or psoriasis vulgaris (PsO) from the 2000 Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID 2000) in Taiwan. Two hundred and sixty-one patients with neoplasm from 1997 to 2013 were enrolled in this study, and controls were matched in a 1:1 ratio with age, sex, and year of enrollment. Composition of demographic indices, comorbidities, medication usage, and differences in days of prescription of different medications between neoplasm and neoplasm-free (control) groups were compared. Results: Between the control and neoplasm groups, no differences in ratio were observed in the usage of hydroxychloroquine (50.96 vs. 49.04%, p = 0.6616), methotrexate (26.82 vs. 27.59%, p = 0.8441), azathioprine (3.45 vs. 3.07%, p = 0.8052), and cyclophosphamide (1.15 vs. 2.30%, p = 0.3131) from enrollment to index date. Medications within 3 years before the index date in patients that had ≥3 months of comparable duration also showed no difference (hydroxychloroquine: 33.06 vs. 30.25%, p = 0.6404; methotrexate: 20.66 vs. 25.21%, p = 0.4018; azathioprine: 2.48 vs. 2.52%, p = 0.9835; cyclophosphamide: 0.83 vs. 0.84%, p = 0.9906). We also made a subgroup analysis focusing on RA and SLE patients; no difference between control and neoplasm group in both the ratio of usage and days of prescription of hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide was observed. Conclusion: Neoplasm risk in patients with rheumatic diseases has no correlation with csDMARD usage.

Eight pillars of oncorheumatology: Crossroads between malignancies and musculoskeletal diseases

ONCORHEUMATOLOGY

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MALIGNANCIES AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES: Oncorheumatology is the meeting point of tumor formation and rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMD). Multiple interactions exist between these two medical specialties. One major field is the topic of malignancies associated with rheumatic diseases, while the other topic covers the development of musculoskeletal disease in cancer patients. Within the first group, secondary malignancies may be associated with rheumatic diseases. Mostly sustained inflammation is responsible for transition into cancer. Tumor-associated antigens (TAA) with adhesive properties are present on tumor cells. These molecules may also be expressed by inflammatory leukocytes and soluble TAA levels may be elevated in RMDs. There has been continuous debate with respect to the possible carcinogenicity of conventional and targeted antirheumatic drugs. Very recent data from registries suggest that neither biologics, nor JAK inhibitors increase cancer risk in arthritis patients. The issue of physiotherapy in rheumatic patients with recent or current cancer has also been controversial. Some modalities, primarily exercise, may be safely applied to patients with RMD and cancer. The second large topic includes paraneoplastic syndromes. Musculoskeletal paraneoplasias are triggered by tumor-derived mediators. These syndromes are sometimes slightly different from the classical RMDs. Various chemotherapies may also be associated with autoimmune side effects. Recently, these immune-related complications have also been observed in cancer patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Sex hormone-deprivation therapies, such as aromatase inhibitors and anti-androgens are widely used for the treatment of breast and prostate cancer, respectively. These compounds may induce bone loss and lead to osteoporosis. Finally, primary and secondary malignancies of the musculoskeletal system may also interest rheumatologists. In this review, the clinical, practical aspects of these eight pillars of oncorheumatology will be discussed.

Clinical Pharmacology and Interplay of Immune Checkpoint Agents: A Yin-Yang Balance

T cells have a central role in immune system balance. When activated, they may lead to autoimmune diseases. When too anergic, they contribute to infection spread and cancer proliferation. Immune checkpoint proteins regulate T cell function, including cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1). These nodes of self-tolerance may be exploited pharmacologically to downregulate (CTLA-4 agonists) and activate [CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 antagonists, also called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] the immune system.CTLA-4 agonists are used to treat rheumatologic immune disorders and graft rejection. CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 antagonists are approved for multiple cancer types and are being investigated for chronic viral infections. Notably, ICIs may be associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can be highly morbid or fatal. CTLA-4 agonism has been a promising method to reverse such life-threatening irAEs. Herein, we review the clinical pharmacology of these immune checkpoint agents with a focus on their interplay in human diseases.

Effects of tumour necrosis factor on cardiovascular disease and cancer: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are used in the treatment of certain autoimmune diseases but given the role of TNF in tumour biology and atherosclerosis, such therapies may influence the risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease. We conducted a Mendelian randomization study to explore whether TNF levels are causally related to cardiovascular disease and cancer.

METHODS

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with TNF levels at genome-wide significance were identified from a genome-wide association study of 30 912 European-ancestry individuals. Three TNF-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with higher risk of autoimmune diseases were used as instrumental variables. Summary-level data for 14 cardiovascular diseases, overall cancer and 14 site-specific cancers were obtained from UK Biobank and consortia.

FINDINGS

Genetically-predicted TNF levels were positively associated with coronary artery disease (odds ratio (OR) 2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.50, 3.37) and ischaemic stroke (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.50, 3.43), and inversely associated with overall cancer (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.42, 0.69), breast cancer (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.39, 0.67), and colorectal cancer (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.09, 0.45). There were suggestive associations of TNF with venous thromboembolism (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.32, 3.59), endometrial cancer (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.07, 0.94), and lung cancer (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21, 0.94).

INTERPRETATION

This study found evidence of causal associations of increased TNF levels with higher risk of common cardiovascular diseases and lower risk of overall and certain cancers.

Risk of malignancy with non-TNFi biologic or tofacitinib therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk of developing cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exposed to non-TNF inhibitors (TNFi) biologics or tofacitinib therapy.

METHODS

Systematical search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library plus a hand search of conference proceedings were performed. Observational studies that reported cancer incidence in patients with RA treated with biologics or tofacitinib with active comparator of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or TNFi were eligible for inclusion. The pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with fix-effects or random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of 2,819 identified articles, a total of 10 studies involving over 40,587 patients with more than 87,622 patient-years of exposure to non-TNF inhibitors (TNFi) biologics and 2,221 patients with more than 4,506 patient-years of exposure to tofacitinib were included. Pooled analysis showed there was no increased risk of developing cancer in general or specific cancer types in RA patients receiving treatment with rituximab (pooled RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.03), tocilizumab (pooled RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.06), or tofacitinib, compared with those receiving csDMARDs or TNFi. But abatacept was associated with a slightly increased overall cancer risk (pooled RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.24) and non-melanoma skin cancer (pooled RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09-1.45), relative to csDMARDs or TNFi in RA patients.

CONCLUSION

Among RA patients, a small statistically significant increase in developing cancer was observed for abatacept exposure, while no increased cancer risk for rituximab, tocilizumab or tofacitinib, in comparison with csDMARDs or TNFi.

Adverse Effects of Low-Dose Methotrexate: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Low-dose methotrexate (LD-MTX) is the most commonly used drug for systemic rheumatic diseases worldwide and is the recommended first-line agent for rheumatoid arthritis. Despite extensive clinical use for more than 30 years, few data on adverse event (AE) rates derive from randomized, placebo-controlled trials, where both causality and magnitude of risk can be inferred.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate AE rates, risk, and risk differences comparing LD-MTX versus placebo.

DESIGN

Prespecified secondary analyses of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01594333).

SETTING

North America.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with known cardiovascular disease and diabetes or metabolic syndrome.

INTERVENTION

Random allocation to LD-MTX (≤20 mg/wk) or placebo. All participants received folic acid, 1 mg/d, 6 days per week.

MEASUREMENTS

Risks for specific AEs of interest, as well as for all AEs, were compared across treatment groups after blinded adjudication.

RESULTS

After an active run-in period, 6158 patients were enrolled and 4786 randomly assigned to a group; median follow-up was 23 months and median dosage 15 mg/wk. Among the randomly assigned participants, 81.2% were male, median age was 65.7 years, and median body mass index was 31.5 kg/m2. Of 2391 participants assigned to LD-MTX, 2080 (87.0%) had an AE of interest, compared with 1951 of 2395 (81.5%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.25]). The relative hazards of gastrointestinal (HR, 1.91 [CI, 1.75 to 2.10]), pulmonary (HR, 1.52 [CI, 1.16 to 1.98]), infectious (HR, 1.15 [CI, 1.01 to 1.30]), and hematologic (HR, 1.15 [CI, 1.07 to 1.23]) AEs were elevated for LD-MTX versus placebo. With the exception of increased risk for skin cancer (HR, 2.05 [CI, 1.28 to 3.28]), the treatment groups did not differ in risk for other cancer or mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, or musculoskeletal AEs. Renal AEs were reduced in the LD-MTX group (HR, 0.85 [CI, 0.78 to 0.93]).

LIMITATION

The trial was done in patients without rheumatic disease who tolerated LD-MTX during an active run-in period.

CONCLUSION

Use of LD-MTX was associated with small to moderate elevations in risks for skin cancer and gastrointestinal, infectious, pulmonary, and hematologic AEs, whereas renal AEs were decreased.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.

Molecular mechanisms underlying rheumatoid arthritis and cancer development and treatment

Given recent advances in cancer immune therapy, specifically use of checkpoint inhibitors, understanding the link between autoimmunity and cancer is essential. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects about 1% of the population, and early diagnosis is key to prevent joint damage. Management consists of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs that alter normal immunologic pathways, which could affect malignancy growth and survival. Prolonged immune dysregulation and the resulting inflammatory response associated with development of RA may also lead to increased cancer development risk. RA has long been associated with increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [1] and further evidence supports relationship to lung cancer [2]. This review will address the mechanisms behind cancer development and progression in RA patients, biomarkers and assess cancer risk and early detection.

Abatacept initiation in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of cancer: a population-based comparative cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether abatacept as initial biological DMARD (bDMARD) in the treatment of RA, when compared with other bDMARDs, is associated with an increased risk of cancer overall and by specific cancer sites (breast, lung, lymphoma, melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer).

METHODS

We performed a population-based cohort study among patients newly treated with bDMARDs within the US-based Truven MarketScan population and Supplemental US Medicare from 2007 to 2014. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CIs of any cancer (and specific cancers) associated with initiation of abatacept, compared with initiation of other bDMARDs, adjusted for age and deciles of the propensity score.

RESULTS

The cohort included 4328 patients on abatacept and 59 860 on other bDMARDs, of whom 409 and 4197 were diagnosed with any cancer during follow-up (incidence rates 4.76 per 100 per year and 3.41 per 100 per year, respectively). Compared with other bDMARDs, the use of abatacept was associated with an increased incidence of cancer overall (hazard ratioadjusted 1.17; 95% CI 1.06, 1.30). Analyses by specific cancer sites showed a significantly increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (hazard ratioadjusted 1.20; 95% CI 1.03, 1.39), but no significant difference for other specific cancer sites.

CONCLUSION

The use of abatacept as first bDMARD in the treatment of RA was associated with a slight increased risk of cancer overall and particularly non-melanoma skin cancer, compared with other bDMARDs. This potential signal needs to be replicated in other settings.

Safety of abatacept compared with other biologic and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from an observational study

Background

To assess the risks of malignancies, infections and autoimmune diseases in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with abatacept compared with other biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs, in a US-wide observational RA cohort

Methods

Data were reviewed from patients (≥ 18 years) with RA who were registered with FORWARD, the National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, and who initiated abatacept, other bDMARDs or csDMARDs between 2005 and 2015. Patients who switched treatment during the study could be allocated to more than one group. The incidence rates (IRs) by treatment were calculated for malignancies, hospitalized infections and autoimmune diseases identified by six monthly questionnaires and medical records. The hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for all outcomes with abatacept compared with other bDMARDs or csDMARDs were determined using marginal structural models adjusted for clinical confounders.

Results

In the study sample, 1496 initiated abatacept, 3490 initiated another bDMARD and 1520 initiated a csDMARD. The risk of malignancies with abatacept was not statistically significant versus other bDMARDs (HR [95% CI)] 1.89 [0.93, 3.84]) or versus csDMARDs (HR [95% CI] 0.93 [0.20, 4.27]). Patients receiving abatacept versus other bDMARDs were at a lower risk of hospitalized infections (HR [95% CI] 0.37 [0.18, 0.75]); the risk versus csDMARDs was lower with wide CIs (HR [95% CI] 0.31 [0.09, 1.05]). The relative risks for psoriasis were similar between treatment groups (HR [95% CI] 1.46 [0.76, 2.81] and HR [95% CI] 2.05 [0.59, 7.16] for abatacept versus other bDMARDs and versus csDMARDS, respectively). The IR (95% CI) of severe infusion/injection reactions was lower with abatacept compared with other bDMARDs (1.57 [1.11, 2.17] vs 2.31 [1.87, 2.82] per 100 patient-years, respectively).

Conclusions

In this analysis, abatacept was well tolerated and did not result in an overall increased risk of malignancies, infections or autoimmune diseases compared with other bDMARDs or csDMARDs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1921-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Malignancy and rheumatoid arthritis: Epidemiology, risk factors and management

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory condition that can result in pain and functional disability. It is also associated with an increased occurrence of comorbidities, including an increased risk of certain cancers such as lung cancer and lymphoma. The aetiopathogenesis of this increased cancer risk is likely multifactorial and includes shared risk factors as well as chronic inflammation. There is also a concern that the treatment for RA itself may increase this risk further, particularly treatment with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This paper aims to review the evidence for the increased risk of cancer in RA as well as the latest evidence for the association between DMARDs and tumorigenesis. It also discusses the evidence for the management of patients with biologic DMARDs in the setting of existing cancer.

Low-Dose Methotrexate for the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Events

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is causally related to atherothrombosis. Treatment with canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits inflammation by neutralizing interleukin-1β, resulted in a lower rate of cardiovascular events than placebo in a previous randomized trial. We sought to determine whether an alternative approach to inflammation inhibition with low-dose methotrexate might provide similar benefit.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of low-dose methotrexate (at a target dose of 15 to 20 mg weekly) or matching placebo in 4786 patients with previous myocardial infarction or multivessel coronary disease who additionally had either type 2 diabetes or the metabolic syndrome. All participants received 1 mg of folate daily. The primary end point at the onset of the trial was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Near the conclusion of the trial, but before unblinding, hospitalization for unstable angina that led to urgent revascularization was added to the primary end point.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped after a median follow-up of 2.3 years. Methotrexate did not result in lower interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, or C-reactive protein levels than placebo. The final primary end point occurred in 201 patients in the methotrexate group and in 207 in the placebo group (incidence rate, 4.13 vs. 4.31 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.16). The original primary end point occurred in 170 patients in the methotrexate group and in 167 in the placebo group (incidence rate, 3.46 vs. 3.43 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.25). Methotrexate was associated with elevations in liver-enzyme levels, reductions in leukocyte counts and hematocrit levels, and a higher incidence of non-basal-cell skin cancers than placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with stable atherosclerosis, low-dose methotrexate did not reduce levels of interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, or C-reactive protein and did not result in fewer cardiovascular events than placebo. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; CIRT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01594333.).

Practical guidance for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with cancer. Which treatment?

Clinicians involved in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increasingly come across patients with current or previous history of malignancies. With increasing and earlier use of immunosuppression and biologics in IBD patients, the question arises whether these treatments further increase the risk of new or recurrent cancers. A number of population-based observational studies have now reported the odds of development of new or recurrent cancers with thiopurines and antitumour necrosis factors (anti-TNFs). These data combined with data arising from treatment registries from other immune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis are providing evidence of relative risks and safety profiles of these agents in the setting of active or prior cancer. Data from transplant literature give an indication for providing a drug-holiday period in patients with treated cancers. The risks of the treatment should be considered alongside the risk associated with withholding these effective treatments in patients with active IBD. In this review, we aim to summarize the current evidence in this area and provide a practical guidance.

A Practical Approach to the Use of Conventional Synthetic, Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs for the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis in Patients with a History of Malignancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) have been used in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis (IA) for many years. More recently, biologic (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARDs) DMARDs have further improved treatment. Due to increased patient longevity and effective oncology treatment, rheumatologists often encounter patients with IA and previous malignancy. The immunosuppressive effect of DMARDs causes concern regarding impaired tumour surveillance with a potential increased risk of malignancy. We reviewed the literature regarding the risk of malignancy in patients on cs-/b-/tsDMARDS and sought to provide practical advice regarding use of these drugs in patients with previous malignancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from randomised controlled trials is limited as patients with pre-existing malignancy are often excluded. Reassuringly, an increasing range of "real world" data from various national b/tsDMARD registries has not provided a convincing signal that these drugs increase tumour recurrence. Nevertheless, awareness of, and adherence to, national screening guidelines for malignancy is important. Given the improvement in quality of life achieved with these novel and well-tolerated therapeutic agents, the benefit/risk profile remains overwhelmingly favourable in most patients.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a cohort of adults with rheumatologic conditions

Based on limited evidence, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a black box warning for the use of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFIs) and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Our objective was to determine the risk of NHL associated with TNFI use by duration and type of anti-TNF agent. We performed a nested case-control study within a retrospective cohort of adults with rheumatologic conditions from a U.S. commercial health insurance database between 2009 and 2015. Use of TNFIs (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab and certolizumab pegol) and conventional-synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) was identified, and conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk of NHL. From a retrospective cohort of 55,446 adult patients, 101 NHL cases and 984 controls matched on age, gender and rheumatologic indication were included. Compared to controls, NHL cases had greater TNFI use (33% vs. 20%) but were similar in csDMARD use (70% vs. 71%). TNFI ever-use was associated with nearly two-fold increased risk of NHL (OR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.16-3.20) with suggestion of increasing risk with duration (P-trend = 0.05). TNF fusion protein (etanercept) was associated with increased NHL risk (OR = 2.73; 95% CI: 1.40-5.33), whereas risk with anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies was not statistically significant (OR = 1.77; 95% CI: 0.87-3.58). In sensitivity analyses evaluating confounding by rheumatologic disease severity, channeling bias was not likely to account for our results. Our findings support the FDA black box warning for NHL. Continued surveillance and awareness of this rare but serious adverse outcome are warranted with new TNFIs and biosimilar products forthcoming.

Etanercept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Etanercept was the first specific anticytokine therapy approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its clinical efficacy and safety has been demonstrated by several clinical trials in early as well as established disease. Etanercept, along with other TNF inhibitors, have revolutionized management of RA and dramatically improved disease activity, function, quality of life and mortality for these patients. It is structurally distinct from other TNF inhibitors and thus has desirable profiles for immunogenicity, drug survival and infection rate. With the increasing number of etanercept biosimilars, there will likely be a resurgence of their prescription. This article reviews the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of the etanercept reference product, and its biosimilars, in the context of RA treatment.

Melanoma risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinicians are concerned that treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonists (TNFα biologics) may increase patients' risk of melanoma compared with treatment with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (nbDMARDS). We aimed to assess the risk of melanoma in RA patients treated with TNFα biologics compared with RA patients treated with nbDMARDS. A secondary aim was to quantify the risk of melanoma in RA patients treated with TNFα biologics compared with the general population. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis searching Medline, Embase and the ISI Science Citation Index databases to January 2016. Cohort studies that enabled a quantitative assessment of the risk of melanoma in RA patients treated with TNFα biologics compared with either RA patients treated with nbDMARDS or the general population or both were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. From 812 articles, we identified six that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Four studies reported on the risk of melanoma in RA patients treated with TNFα biologics compared with those treated with nbDMARDS, with a pooled effect estimate of 1.60 (95% confidence interval 1.16-2.19). Five reported on the risk of melanoma in RA patients treated with TNFα biologics compared with the general population, and the pooled effect estimate was 1.87 (95% confidence interval 1.53-2.30). There was no significant heterogeneity in either analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis does not allay clinician's fears and, while awaiting further evidence from large collaborative studies, this patient population may benefit from regular skin checks and counselling to avoid excessive sun exposure.

Venous thromboembolism and risk of cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Essentials Can venous thromboembolism (VTE) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients be marker of cancer? RA patients with VTE and comparison cohorts from population-based registries were compared. Increased risk of cancer in RA patients with VTE during the first year of VTE was observed. Risk of cancer in RA patients was increased also during the longer period following VTE.

SUMMARY

Background It is unknown whether venous thromboembolism (VTE) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients can be a marker of occult cancer. Objectives To examine risk of cancer subsequent to VTE among RA patients compared with risk of cancer in an RA cohort without VTE and in a general population without RA and without VTE. Patients/Methods All RA patients with a first-time diagnosis of VTE (index date) during 1978-2013 and comparison cohorts were identified from population-based registries in Denmark. Results We identified three cohorts: 2497 RA patients with VTE, 11 672 RA patients without VTE and 12 730 persons from the general population. The cumulative incidence of cancer within the first year of the index date was 3.2% among RA with VTE, 2.2% among RA without VTE, and 2.0% in the general population cohort. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were 1.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.33) for RA patients with VTE vs. RA patients without VTE and 2.12 (95% CI, 1.63-2.76) for RA patients with VTE vs. the general population. The IRR of cancer at > 1 to 36 years from the index date among RA patients with VTE was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.00-1.34) compared with the RA patients without VTE and 1.33 (95% CI, 1.15-1.53) compared with the general population. Conclusions We found an increased risk of cancer in RA patients with VTE during the first year following VTE and also during the longer follow-up period. Thus, VTE may not only be a result of inflammation and immunological dysfunctions associated with RA, but may also be a marker for occult cancer.

How does autoimmune disease impact treatment and outcomes among patients with lung cancer? A national SEER-Medicare analysis

BACKGROUND

The advent of cancer immunotherapy has made autoimmune disease in oncology populations clinically important. We analyzed the association of autoimmune disease with treatment and outcomes among lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Using linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, we identified lung cancer patients diagnosed between 1992 and 2009 with autoimmune diseases. We recorded number and timing of autoimmune disease diagnoses, lung cancer treatment, and markers of healthcare utilization including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and outpatient visits. To account for potential lead-time bias, we used a matched case-control analysis wherein living and deceased patients were matched on survival time. We performed unadjusted and multivariable adjusted logistic regressions separately by cancer stage for all-cause and lung cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Among 172,285 lung cancer patients, 23,084 (13.4%) had ≥1 autoimmune disease at any time. Overall, 10,927 patients (6.3%) had one autoimmune disease before cancer diagnosis; 9338 (5.4%) had two or more before cancer diagnosis; and 2819 (1.6%) had one or more after cancer diagnosis. Healthcare utilization was higher in the autoimmune disease population. Lung cancer treatment patterns were similar among patients with and without autoimmune disease and there was no significant association with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with lung cancer, autoimmune disease does not influence treatment patterns and is not associated with mortality.

Malignant Neoplasms in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors, Tocilizumab, Abatacept, or Rituximab in Clinical Practice: A Nationwide Cohort Study From Sweden

IMPORTANCE

Considering the widespread and increasing use of biological immunomodulators (biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [bDMARDs]) to treat chronic inflammatory conditions, and the concern that immunomodulation may alter cancer risk and progression, the limited available data on use of these therapies as used in clinical practice and cancer risks are a concern.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of incident malignant neoplasms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with bDMARDs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a national register-based prospective cohort study of the public health care system in Sweden from 2006 to 2015. Cohorts of patients with RA initiating treatment with tocilizumab (n = 1798), abatacept (n = 2021), and rituximab (n = 3586), a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) as first-ever (n = 10 782) or second-ever (n = 4347) bDMARD, a biologics-naive cohort treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (n = 46 610), and a general population comparator cohort (n = 107 491).

EXPOSURES

Treatment with tocilizumab, abatacept, rituximab, or TNFi.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcomes included a first invasive solid or hematologic malignant neoplasm, or skin cancer. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox-regression, adjusted for age, sex, disease and treatment characteristics, and educational level.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 15 129 initiations of TNFi as the first or second bDMARD, 7405 initiations of other bDMARDs, and 46 610 csDMARD users. The mean age varied from 58 to 64 years, and the proportion of female patients varied from 71% to 80%, across the 7 cohorts under study. The observed numbers of events (crude incidence per 100 000 person-years) for a first invasive solid or hematologic malignant neoplasm were 50 (959) for tocilizumab, 61 (1026) for abatacept, 141 (1074) for rituximab, 478 (978) for initiators of TNFi as first bDMARD, and 169 (917) for TNFi as second bDMARD. There were no statistically significant differences between initiators of a first or second TNFi, or other bDMARDs, and bDMARD-naive RA for any of a total of 25 drug- and outcome-specific comparisons, with 1 exception (abatacept and increased risk of squamous cell skin cancer).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The overall risk of cancer among patients with RA initiating TNFi as first or second bDMARD, tocilizumab, abatacept, or rituximab does not differ substantially from that of biologic drug-naive, csDMARD-treated patients with RA, although altered risks for specific cancer types, or those with longer latency, cannot be excluded.

Intravenous immunoglobulin: a biological corticosteroid-sparing agent in some autoimmune conditions

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is increasingly used for the treatment of autoimmune and systemic inflammatory diseases. This compound is effective in a wide range of clinical conditions other than primary immunodeficiency, including autoimmune diseases, inflammatory disorders, infections, organ transplantation, and possibly supportive therapy for cancer. Systemic corticosteroids remain the gold standard treatment for many autoimmune diseases, but their long-term use is associated with complications in diverse organs and systems. Osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, cardiovascular disease, infections, and cancer have been associated with this treatment. Therefore, physicians are occasionally forced to withdraw the treatment with steroids. Biological agents may represent a good alternative, but in addition to being very expensive, these agents may have serious side effects. This review aimed to cover the major advances in the use of IVIg as a steroid-sparing agent in some relevant autoimmune diseases.

Collaborative Power of Nrf2 and PPARγ Activators against Metabolic and Drug-Induced Oxidative Injury

Mammalian cells have evolved a unique strategy to protect themselves against oxidative damage induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Especially, two transcription factors, nuclear factor erythroid 2p45-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), have been shown to play key roles in establishing this cellular antioxidative defense system. Recently, several researchers reported ameliorating effects of pharmacological activators for these Nrf2 and PPARγ pathways on the progression of various metabolic disorders and drug-induced organ injuries by oxidative stress. In this review, general features of Nrf2 and PPARγ pathways in the context of oxidative protection will be summarized first. Then, a number of successful applications of natural and synthetic Nrf2 and PPARγ activators to the alleviation of pathological and drug-related oxidative damage will be discussed later.