1
|
Chen Y, Wang E, Sites BD, Cohen SP. Integrating mechanistic-based and classification-based concepts into perioperative pain management: an educational guide for acute pain physicians. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024; 49:581-601. [PMID: 36707224 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pain begins with acute pain. Physicians tend to classify pain by duration (acute vs chronic) and mechanism (nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic). Although this taxonomy may facilitate diagnosis and documentation, such categories are to some degree arbitrary constructs, with significant overlap in terms of mechanisms and treatments. In clinical practice, there are myriad different definitions for chronic pain and a substantial portion of chronic pain involves mixed phenotypes. Classification of pain based on acuity and mechanisms informs management at all levels and constitutes a critical part of guidelines and treatment for chronic pain care. Yet specialty care is often siloed, with advances in understanding lagging years behind in some areas in which these developments should be at the forefront of clinical practice. For example, in perioperative pain management, enhanced recovery protocols are not standardized and tend to drive treatment without consideration of mechanisms, which in many cases may be incongruent with personalized medicine and mechanism-based treatment. In this educational document, we discuss mechanisms and classification of pain as it pertains to commonly performed surgical procedures. Our goal is to provide a clinical reference for the acute pain physician to facilitate pain management decision-making (both diagnosis and therapy) in the perioperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yian Chen
- Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Eric Wang
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brian D Sites
- Anesthesiology and Orthopaedics, Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Anesthesiology, Neurology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mylius V, Moisset X, Rukavina K, Rosner J, Korwisi B, Marques A, Lloret SP, Kägi G, Bohlhalter S, Bannister K, Chaudhuri KR, Barke A, Tinazzi M, Brefel-Courbon C, Treede RD, de Andrade DC. New ICD-11 diagnostic criteria for chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain associated with Parkinson disease. Pain 2024:00006396-990000000-00497. [PMID: 38227568 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Veit Mylius
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurorehabilitation, Valens, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Xavier Moisset
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Katarina Rukavina
- Division of Neuroscience, Department of Basic & Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom
- Parkinson Foundation Centre of Excellence in Care and Research, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Rosner
- Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Beatrice Korwisi
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Interventions, Institute of Psychology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ana Marques
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Santiago Perez Lloret
- Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Observatorio de Salud Pública, Universidad Católica Argentina, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (UCA-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Georg Kägi
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Bohlhalter
- Neurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kirsty Bannister
- Division of Neuroscience, Department of Basic & Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kallol Ray Chaudhuri
- Division of Neuroscience, Department of Basic & Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom
- Parkinson Foundation Centre of Excellence in Care and Research, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Antonia Barke
- Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Interventions, Institute of Psychology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Michele Tinazzi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Christine Brefel-Courbon
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Neurosciences, University Hospital of Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France
| | - Rolf Detlef Treede
- Department of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, and Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute for Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manchikanti L, Sanapati M, Hirsch J. Letter to the Editor Regarding "Comparative Outcome of Lidocaine versus Bupivacaine for Cervical Medial Branch Block in Chronic Cervical Facet Arthropathy: A Randomized Double-Blind Study". World Neurosurg 2023; 178:293-294. [PMID: 37803681 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Laxmaiah Manchikanti
- Pain Management Centers of America, Ambulatory Surgery Center and Pain Care Surgery Center, Paducah, Kentucky, USA; Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
| | - Mahendra Sanapati
- Pain Management Centers of America and Advanced Ambulatory Surgery Center, Evansville, Indiana, USA
| | - Joshua Hirsch
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nemecek Z, Sturm C, Rauen AC, Reisig F, Streitberger K, Harnik MA. Ultrasound-controlled cryoneurolysis for peripheral mononeuropathies: a retrospective cohort study. Pain Manag 2023; 13:363-372. [PMID: 37424263 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Cryoneurolysis is a potential therapy for peripheral mononeuropathies, but randomized studies of its effects on the duration of pain reduction are lacking. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the analgesic effects of cryoneurolysis on patients with refractory peripheral mononeuropathy. We included 24 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided cryoneurolysis between June 2018 and July 2022. The daily maximum pain level was recorded using a numerical rating scale before and 1, 3 and 6 months after the procedure. Results: At 1 month, 54.2% of patients reported pain reduction of at least 30%. This percentage was significantly lower at 3 and 6 months (13.8 and 9.1%, respectively). Conclusion: Our results suggest that repeated cryoneurolysis may be a viable treatment for refractory mononeuropathy. Further investigations are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zdenek Nemecek
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Constanze Sturm
- Department of Osteoporosis, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anna C Rauen
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Florian Reisig
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Konrad Streitberger
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael A Harnik
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hurley RW, Adams MCB, Barad M, Bhaskar A, Bhatia A, Chadwick A, Deer TR, Hah J, Hooten WM, Kissoon NR, Lee DW, Mccormick Z, Moon JY, Narouze S, Provenzano DA, Schneider BJ, van Eerd M, Van Zundert J, Wallace MS, Wilson SM, Zhao Z, Cohen SP. Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2022; 47:3-59. [PMID: 34764220 PMCID: PMC8639967 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The past two decades have witnessed a surge in the use of cervical spine joint procedures including joint injections, nerve blocks and radiofrequency ablation to treat chronic neck pain, yet many aspects of the procedures remain controversial. METHODS In August 2020, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the American Academy of Pain Medicine approved and charged the Cervical Joint Working Group to develop neck pain guidelines. Eighteen stakeholder societies were identified, and formal request-for-participation and member nomination letters were sent to those organizations. Participating entities selected panel members and an ad hoc steering committee selected preliminary questions, which were then revised by the full committee. Each question was assigned to a module composed of 4-5 members, who worked with the Subcommittee Lead and the Committee Chairs on preliminary versions, which were sent to the full committee after revisions. We used a modified Delphi method whereby the questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chairs, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was reached. Before commencing, it was agreed that a recommendation would be noted with >50% agreement among committee members, but a consensus recommendation would require ≥75% agreement. RESULTS Twenty questions were selected, with 100% consensus achieved in committee on 17 topics. Among participating organizations, 14 of 15 that voted approved or supported the guidelines en bloc, with 14 questions being approved with no dissensions or abstentions. Specific questions addressed included the value of clinical presentation and imaging in selecting patients for procedures, whether conservative treatment should be used before injections, whether imaging is necessary for blocks, diagnostic and prognostic value of medial branch blocks and intra-articular joint injections, the effects of sedation and injectate volume on validity, whether facet blocks have therapeutic value, what the ideal cut-off value is for designating a block as positive, how many blocks should be performed before radiofrequency ablation, the orientation of electrodes, whether larger lesions translate into higher success rates, whether stimulation should be used before radiofrequency ablation, how best to mitigate complication risks, if different standards should be applied to clinical practice and trials, and the indications for repeating radiofrequency ablation. CONCLUSIONS Cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation may provide benefit to well-selected individuals, with medial branch blocks being more predictive than intra-articular injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of false-negatives (ie, lower overall success rate). Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Hurley
- Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Meredith C B Adams
- Anesthesiology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Meredith Barad
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Arun Bhaskar
- Anesthesiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Haemodialysis Clinic, Hayes Satellite Unit, Hayes, UK
| | - Anuj Bhatia
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto and University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Chadwick
- Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Timothy R Deer
- Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, West Virginia University - Health Sciences Campus, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Jennifer Hah
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | | | - David Wonhee Lee
- Fullerton Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Group, Fullerton, California, USA
| | - Zachary Mccormick
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jee Youn Moon
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, South Korea
| | - Samer Narouze
- Center for Pain Medicine, Summa Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| | - David A Provenzano
- Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Sewickley, Pennsylvania, USA
- Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Edgeworth, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Byron J Schneider
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Maarten van Eerd
- Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Van Zundert
- Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Mark S Wallace
- Anesthesiology, UCSD Medical Center - Thornton Hospital, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Zirong Zhao
- Neurology, VA Healthcare Center District of Columbia, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Anesthesiology, Neurology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Psychiatry, Pain Medicine Division, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hurley RW, Adams MCB, Barad M, Bhaskar A, Bhatia A, Chadwick A, Deer TR, Hah J, Hooten WM, Kissoon NR, Lee DW, Mccormick Z, Moon JY, Narouze S, Provenzano DA, Schneider BJ, van Eerd M, Van Zundert J, Wallace MS, Wilson SM, Zhao Z, Cohen SP. Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2021; 22:2443-2524. [PMID: 34788462 PMCID: PMC8633772 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The past two decades have witnessed a surge in the use of cervical spine joint procedures including joint injections, nerve blocks and radiofrequency ablation to treat chronic neck pain, yet many aspects of the procedures remain controversial. METHODS In August 2020, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the American Academy of Pain Medicine approved and charged the Cervical Joint Working Group to develop neck pain guidelines. Eighteen stakeholder societies were identified, and formal request-for-participation and member nomination letters were sent to those organizations. Participating entities selected panel members and an ad hoc steering committee selected preliminary questions, which were then revised by the full committee. Each question was assigned to a module composed of 4-5 members, who worked with the Subcommittee Lead and the Committee Chairs on preliminary versions, which were sent to the full committee after revisions. We used a modified Delphi method whereby the questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chairs, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was reached. Before commencing, it was agreed that a recommendation would be noted with >50% agreement among committee members, but a consensus recommendation would require ≥75% agreement. RESULTS Twenty questions were selected, with 100% consensus achieved in committee on 17 topics. Among participating organizations, 14 of 15 that voted approved or supported the guidelines en bloc, with 14 questions being approved with no dissensions or abstentions. Specific questions addressed included the value of clinical presentation and imaging in selecting patients for procedures, whether conservative treatment should be used before injections, whether imaging is necessary for blocks, diagnostic and prognostic value of medial branch blocks and intra-articular joint injections, the effects of sedation and injectate volume on validity, whether facet blocks have therapeutic value, what the ideal cut-off value is for designating a block as positive, how many blocks should be performed before radiofrequency ablation, the orientation of electrodes, whether larger lesions translate into higher success rates, whether stimulation should be used before radiofrequency ablation, how best to mitigate complication risks, if different standards should be applied to clinical practice and trials, and the indications for repeating radiofrequency ablation. CONCLUSIONS Cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation may provide benefit to well-selected individuals, with medial branch blocks being more predictive than intra-articular injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of false-negatives (ie, lower overall success rate). Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Hurley
- Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Meredith C B Adams
- Anesthesiology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Meredith Barad
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Arun Bhaskar
- Anesthesiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Haemodialysis Clinic, Hayes Satellite Unit, Hayes, UK
| | - Anuj Bhatia
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto and University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Chadwick
- Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Timothy R Deer
- Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, West Virginia University - Health Sciences Campus, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Jennifer Hah
- Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | | | - David Wonhee Lee
- Fullerton Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Group, Fullerton, California, USA
| | - Zachary Mccormick
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jee Youn Moon
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, South Korea
| | - Samer Narouze
- Center for Pain Medicine, Summa Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| | - David A Provenzano
- Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Sewickley, Pennsylvania, USA
- Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Edgeworth, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Byron J Schneider
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Maarten van Eerd
- Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Van Zundert
- Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Mark S Wallace
- Anesthesiology, UCSD Medical Center - Thornton Hospital, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Zirong Zhao
- Neurology, VA Healthcare Center District of Columbia, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Anesthesia, WRNMMC, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, WRNMMC, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Anesthesiology, Neurology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Psychiatry, Pain Medicine Division, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lawson GE, Nolet PS, Little AR, Bhattacharyya A, Wang V, Lawson CA, Ko GD. Medial Branch Blocks for Diagnosis of Facet Joint Pain Etiology and Use in Chronic Pain Litigation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17217932. [PMID: 33137975 PMCID: PMC7662497 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A commonly disputed medicolegal issue is the documentation of the location, degree, and anatomical source of an injured plaintiff’s ongoing pain, particularly when the painful region is in or near the spine, and when the symptoms have arisen as result of a relatively low speed traffic crash. The purpose of our paper is to provide health and legal practitioners with strategies to identify the source of cervical pain and to aid triers of fact (decision makers) in reaching better informed conclusions. We review the medical evidence for the applications and reliability of cervical medial branch nerve blocks as an indication of painful spinal facets. We also present legal precedents for the legal admissibility of the results of such diagnostic testing as evidence of chronic spine pain after a traffic crash. Part of the reason for the dispute is the subjective nature of pain, and the fact that medical documentation of pain complaints relies primarily on the history given by the patient. A condition that can be documented objectively is chronic cervical spine facet joint pain, as demonstrated by medial branch block (injection). The diagnostic accuracy of medial branch blocks has been extensively described in the scientific medical literature, and evidence of facet blocks to objectively document chronic post-traumatic neck pain has been accepted as scientifically reliable in courts and tribunals in the USA, Canada and the United Kingdom. We conclude that there is convincing scientific medical evidence that the results of cervical facet blocks provide reliable objective evidence of chronic post-traumatic spine pain, suitable for presentation to an adjudicative decision maker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon E. Lawson
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1, Canada; (G.E.L.); (V.W.)
| | - Paul S. Nolet
- Department of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | | | - Anit Bhattacharyya
- Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2 W1, Canada;
| | - Vivian Wang
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1, Canada; (G.E.L.); (V.W.)
| | - C. Adam Lawson
- Shibley Righton LLP, Toronto, ON M5H 3E5, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-416-312-7986
| | - Gordon D. Ko
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cohen SP, Bhaskar A, Bhatia A, Buvanendran A, Deer T, Garg S, Hooten WM, Hurley RW, Kennedy DJ, McLean BC, Moon JY, Narouze S, Pangarkar S, Provenzano DA, Rauck R, Sitzman BT, Smuck M, van Zundert J, Vorenkamp K, Wallace MS, Zhao Z. Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45:424-467. [PMID: 32245841 PMCID: PMC7362874 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The past two decades have witnessed a surge in the use of lumbar facet blocks and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat low back pain (LBP), yet nearly all aspects of the procedures remain controversial. METHODS After approval by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, letters were sent to a dozen pain societies, as well as representatives from the US Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense. A steering committee was convened to select preliminary questions, which were revised by the full committee. Questions were assigned to 4-5 person modules, who worked with the Subcommittee Lead and Committee Chair on preliminary versions, which were sent to the full committee. We used a modified Delphi method, whereby the questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chair, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was reached. RESULTS 17 questions were selected for guideline development, with 100% consensus achieved by committee members on all topics. All societies except for one approved every recommendation, with one society dissenting on two questions (number of blocks and cut-off for a positive block before RFA), but approving the document. Specific questions that were addressed included the value of history and physical examination in selecting patients for blocks, the value of imaging in patient selection, whether conservative treatment should be used before injections, whether imaging is necessary for block performance, the diagnostic and prognostic value of medial branch blocks (MBB) and intra-articular (IA) injections, the effects of sedation and injectate volume on validity, whether facet blocks have therapeutic value, what the ideal cut-off value is for a prognostic block, how many blocks should be performed before RFA, how electrodes should be oriented, the evidence for larger lesions, whether stimulation should be used before RFA, ways to mitigate complications, if different standards should be applied to clinical practice and clinical trials and the evidence for repeating RFA (see table 12 for summary). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar medial branch RFA may provide benefit to well-selected individuals, with MBB being more predictive than IA injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of more false-negatives. Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven P Cohen
- Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine Division, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Arun Bhaskar
- Anesthesiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Haemodialysis Clinic Hayes Satellite Unit, Hayes, UK
| | - Anuj Bhatia
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto and University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tim Deer
- Spine & Nerve Centers, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| | - Shuchita Garg
- Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Robert W Hurley
- Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David J Kennedy
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian C McLean
- Anesthesiology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii, USA
| | - Jee Youn Moon
- Dept of Anesthesiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, The Republic of Korea
| | - Samer Narouze
- Center for Pain Medicine, Summa Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| | - Sanjog Pangarkar
- Dept of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Richard Rauck
- Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Matthew Smuck
- Dept.of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jan van Zundert
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Lanaken, Belgium
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark S Wallace
- Anesthesiology, UCSD Medical Center-Thornton Hospital, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Zirong Zhao
- Neurology, VA Healthcare Center District of Columbia, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Neck pain is the fourth leading cause of disability. Acute neck pain largely resolves within 2 months. History and physical examination play a key role in ruling out some of the more serious causes for neck pain. The evidence for pharmacologic interventions for acute and chronic musculoskeletal neck pain is limited. Lower back pain is the leading cause of disability and productivity loss. Consultation with a physical medicine and rehabilitation spine specialist within 48 hours for acute pain and within 10 days for all patients with lower back pain may significantly decrease rate of surgical interventions and increase patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Popescu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 1800 Lombard Street, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA.
| | - Haewon Lee
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, #8894, San Diego, CA 92103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Durbhakula S, Cohen SP. Gadolinium use for interventional pain procedures: where we are and where we are heading. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018; 44:4-6. [DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
In recent years as the use of interventional pain procedures has soared, so too has outside and internal scrutiny. This scrutiny includes agreater emphasis on weighing the risks and benefits of procedures, increased surveillance for adverse events, and cost containment strategies. In 2016, the first reports of gadolinium deposition in the central nervous system began to surface, though retention in other organ systems has been appreciated for over a decade. In this issue of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, Benzon et al. report a series of patients with document edhypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast medium who were inadvertently administered iodine-based contrast without adverse consequences. In this article, we discuss the epidemiology of contrast-mediated adverse effects, the mechanistic basis for hypersensitivity reactions, the risks and benefits of various approaches in the patient with a documented contrast hypersensitivity reaction, and risk mitigation strategies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Vega E, Rivera G, Echevarria GC, Prylutskyy Z, Perez J, Ingelmo P. Interventional procedures in children and adolescents with chronic non-cancer pain as part of a multidisciplinary pain treatment program. Paediatr Anaesth 2018; 28:999-1006. [PMID: 30251303 DOI: 10.1111/pan.13494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interventional procedures are part of multidisciplinary pain treatment programs to treat chronic non-cancer pain conditions in children and adolescents. However, the real benefit of these interventions remains unclear. AIMS The aim of this study was to analyze the potential benefits of the interventional procedures in children and adolescents with chronic non-cancer pain in the setting of a multidisciplinary pain treatment program. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 98 children and adolescents receiving 314 diagnostic or therapeutic interventional procedures. We applied the following definitions of efficacy Short-term positive therapeutic effect: block that produced a minimum of 50% reduction in pain intensity for at least 4 weeks. Long-term positive therapeutic effect: a patient with a minimum of 50% reduction in pain intensity for at least 6 months Full recovery: a patient free of pain, not taking analgesics with normal physical and role functioning 6 months after the last procedure. RESULTS Seventy-six of 112 diagnostic blocks (68%) were associated with a 50% reduction in pain intensity for at least 4 weeks after the procedure. One hundred and sixty-six of 202 therapeutics blocks (82%) were associated with a short-term benefit. Seventy-two of 98 patients (73%) referred a 50% reduction in their pain intensity (17%) or had full recovery 6 months after the procedures (56%) and a MPTP. Psychiatric comorbidity and more advanced age were factors associated with failure to respond to interventional procedures. CONCLUSION The use of interventional procedures may represent a valid therapeutic option, associated with positive clinical outcomes within a multidisciplinary program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Vega
- Chronic Pain Service, Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Gonzalo Rivera
- Department of Anesthesia, Clinica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ghislaine C Echevarria
- Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Zakhar Prylutskyy
- Chronic Pain Service, Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordi Perez
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.,The Alan Edwards Research Center for Chronic Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.,Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pablo Ingelmo
- Chronic Pain Service, Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada.,The Alan Edwards Research Center for Chronic Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.,CIMPARC (Consortium of Multidisciplinary Pain Researchers and Clinicians), Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The study focuses on neural blocks with local anesthetics in postoperative and chronic pain. It is prompted by the recent publication of several systematic reviews and guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS For postoperative pain, the current evidence supports infusions of local anesthetics at the surgical site, continuous peripheral nerve blocks, and neuraxial analgesia for major thoracic and abdominal procedures. Ultrasound guidance can improve the performance of the blocks and different patient outcomes, although the incidence of peripheral nerve damage is not decreased. For chronic pain, the best available evidence is on nerve blocks for the diagnosis of facet joint pain. Further research is needed to validate diagnostic nerve blocks for other indications. Therapeutic blocks with only local anesthetics (greater occipital nerve and sphenopalatine ganglion) are effective in headache. A possible mechanism is modulation of central nociceptive pathways. Therapeutic nerve blocks for other indications are mostly supported by retrospective studies and case series. SUMMARY Recent literature strongly supports the use of regional anesthesia for postoperative pain, whereby infusions at peripheral nerves and surgical site are gaining increasing importance. Local anesthetic blocks are valid for the diagnosis of facet joint pain and effective in treating headache. There is a need for further research in diagnostic and therapeutic blocks for chronic pain.
Collapse
|
13
|
Curatolo M. Appropriate interventional management of whiplash-associated pain disorders is effective. Scand J Pain 2012; 3:236-237. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2012.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Curatolo
- University Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy , University Hospital of Bern , Inselspital, 3010 Bern , Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Affiliation(s)
- Gunnvald Kvarstein
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nerve block—A reliable diagnostic tool? Scand J Pain 2010; 1:184-185. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|