Severe asthma phenotypes and endotypes

Expert opinion on diagnosis and management of Severe Asthma in low and middle income countries (LMIC) with focus on India

OBJECTIVE

In this document, 9 Indian experts have evaluated the factors specific to LMICs when it came to Severe Asthma (SA) diagnosis, evaluation, biologic selection, non-biologic treatment options, and follow-up.

DATA SOURCES

A search was performed using 50 keywords, focusing on the Indian/LMICs perspective, in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The key areas of the search were focused on diagnosis, phenoendotyping, non-biological therapies, selecting a biologic, assessment of treatment response, and management of exacerbation.

STUDY SELECTIONS

The initial search revealed 1826 articles, from these case reports, observational studies, cohort studies, non-English language papers, etc., were excluded and we short-listed 20 articles for each area. Five relevant articles were selected by the experts for review.

RESULTS

In LMICs, SA patients may be referred to the specialist for evaluation a little late for Phenoendotyping of SA. While biologic therapy is now a standard of care, pulmonologists in LMICs may not have access to all the investigations to phenoendotype SA patients like fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), skin prick test (SPT), etc., but phenotyping of SA patients can also be done with simple blood investigations, eosinophil count and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE). Choosing a biologic in the overlapping phenotype of SA and ACO patients is also a challenge in the LMICs.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitations of LMIC, it is important to select the right patient and explain the potential benefits of biological therapy. Non-biologic add-on therapies can be attempted in a resource-limited setting where biological therapy is not available/feasible for patients.

Revisiting asthma pharmacotherapy: where do we stand and where do we want to go?

Several current guidelines/strategies outline a treatment approach to asthma, which primarily consider the goals of improving lung function and quality of life and reducing symptoms and exacerbations. They suggest a strategy of stepping up or down treatment, depending on the patient's overall current asthma symptom control and future risk of exacerbation. While this stepwise approach is undeniably practical for daily practice, it does not always address the underlying mechanisms of this heterogeneous disease. In the last decade, there have been attempts to improve the treatment of severe asthma, such as the addition of a long-acting antimuscarinic agent to the traditional inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist treatment and the introduction of therapies targeting key cytokines. However, despite such strategies several unmet needs in this population remain, motivating research to identify novel targets and develop improved therapeutic and/or preventative asthma treatments. Pending the availability of such therapies, it is essential to re-evaluate the current conventional "one-size-fits-all" approach to a more precise asthma management. Although challenging, identifying "treatable traits" that contribute to respiratory symptoms in individual patients with asthma may allow a more pragmatic approach to establish more personalised therapeutic goals.

A real-life comparison of pulmonary and nasal outcomes in patients with severe asthma and nasal polyposis treated with T2-biologics

Background

Severe asthma (SA) with comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is frequently associated with type 2 (T2) inflammatory endotype. Consequently, therapeutic targets are T2 biologics. The present retrospective study aimed to analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of mepolizumab, benralizumab, omalizumab, and dupilumab in patients with SA and comorbid CRSwNP.

Methods

115 adult patients with SA and CRSwNP receiving 1 of the 4 biologics (mepolizumab n = 31; benralizumab n = 27; dupilumab n = 27; omalizumab n = 30) were included in the retrospective open monocentric study. Pulmonary and rhinological parameters were evaluated by Asthma Control Test (ACT), FEV1%, GINA-severity grade, rhinological questionnaires (CRS VAS-scores and sinonasal QoL RSOM-31) before and after 4-6 months of therapy.

Results

After 4-6 months of therapy, the Asthma Control Test and FEV1% significantly improved in all biologics groups (p < 0.01). GINA-score significantly improved in the omalizumab group only (p < 0.01). Overall, most nasal scores measured by VAS, total and nasal RSOM-31 subscores improved in all treatment groups (p < 0.05). Interestingly, the most significant differences in pre/post scores were observed in the patients receiving dupilumab, with the most notable improvement for all nasal symptoms, RSOM-31 total score, and RSOM-31 nasal subscore. There were no significant changes in the VAS scores loss of smell in the benralizumab group and postnasal drip in the mepolizumab group.

Conclusion

T2-targeting biologics effectively treat asthma in patients with severe asthma and comorbid CRSwNP. However, the efficacy of T2 biologics differs regarding the outcome in CRSwNP.

Identification of hub genes and potential biomarkers of neutrophilic asthma: evidence from a bioinformatics analysis

OBJECTIVE

Asthma is a chronic airway inflammatory disease caused by multiple genetic and environmental factors. This study mainly sought to provide potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers for neutrophilic asthma (NA).

METHODS

Three gene expression profiling datasets were obtained from the Genome Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. GSE45111 and GSE41863 were used to identify hub genes and potential biomarkers, and GSE137268 was used for data verification. We verified the repeatability of intragroup data and identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Then, we conducted Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses of the DEGs, and a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed to identify the hub genes. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to verify the ability of the hub genes to differentiate between NA and eosinophilic asthma (EA).

RESULTS

In this study, we identified 411 DEGs by comprehensive analysis of NA/EA patients and NA/healthy controls (HCs). Ten hub genes (CXCR1, FCGR3B, CXCR2, SELL, S100A12, CSF3R, IL6R, JAK3, CD48, and GNG2) were identified from the PPI network. Finally, based on the ROC analysis, 7 genes showed good diagnostic value for discriminating NA from EA-CXCR1, FCGR3B, CXCR2, SELL, S100A12, CSF3R, and IL6R (AUC > 0.7).

CONCLUSION

We identified 7 hub genes that can distinguish NA from EA. The IL-8-mediated signaling may be the primary pathway to determine the NA phenotype in asthma. CXCR1/2 and S100A12 may be the primary genes determining the NA phenotype. CXCR1/2 and S100A12 might be biomarkers and new therapeutic targets for NA.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at at.

Multidimensional endotyping using nasal proteomics predicts molecular phenotypes in the asthmatic airways

BACKGROUND

Unsupervised clustering of biomarkers derived from noninvasive samples such as nasal fluid is less evaluated as a tool for describing asthma endotypes.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate whether protein expression in nasal fluid would identify distinct clusters of patients with asthma with specific lower airway molecular phenotypes.

METHODS

Unsupervised clustering of 168 nasal inflammatory and immune proteins and Shapley values was used to stratify 43 patients with severe asthma (endotype of noneosinophilic asthma) using a 2 "modeling blocks" machine learning approach. This algorithm was also applied to nasal brushings transcriptomics from U-BIOPRED (Unbiased Biomarkers for the Prediction of Respiratory Diseases Outcomes). Feature reduction and functional gene analysis were used to compare proteomic and transcriptomic clusters. Gene set variation analysis provided enrichment scores of the endotype of noneosinophilic asthma protein signature within U-BIOPRED sputum and blood.

RESULTS

The nasal protein machine learning model identified 2 severe asthma endotypes, which were replicated in U-BIOPRED nasal transcriptomics. Cluster 1 patients had significant airway obstruction, small airways disease, air trapping, decreased diffusing capacity, and increased oxidative stress, although only 4 of 18 were current smokers. Shapley identified 20 cluster-defining proteins. Forty-one proteins were significantly higher in cluster 1. Pathways associated with proteomic and transcriptomic clusters were linked to T_H1, T_H2, neutrophil, Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription, TLR, and infection activation. Gene set variation analysis of the nasal protein and gene signatures were enriched in subjects with sputum neutrophilic/mixed granulocytic asthma and in subjects with a molecular phenotype found in sputum neutrophil-high subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Protein or gene analysis may indicate molecular phenotypes within the asthmatic lower airway and provide a simple, noninvasive test for non-type 2 immune response asthma that is currently unavailable.

Identifying clinical and demographic characteristic differences between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic asthma and detecting predictors of eosinophilic asthma among Egyptian asthmatic patients

Introduction

Asthma is a heterogenous disease with various phenotypes that is characterized by airway limitation due to bronchospasm and airway inflammation associated with excessive mucus secretion. Eosinophilic asthma subtype is described as a late onset asthma that presents with more severe respiratory symptoms, and with sputum eosinophilia ≥ 3%. In the current study, we aimed to identify the difference in the clinical and demographic characteristics between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic asthma subtypes and to determine predictors of eosinophilic asthma.

Materials and methods

One hundred bronchial asthma patients with age ≥ 18 years were divided into two groups according to sputum eosinophilia. All patients were subjected to medical history, Asthma Control Test (ACT), spirometry, serum IgE level, skin prick testing (SPT), and nasal endoscopy to detect nasal polyposis and allergic signs.

Results

No statistical difference was found between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic asthma patients regarding age, gender, and body mass index. Patients with sputum eosinophilia had more severe obstruction by spirometry, and positive SPT to food allergens, pollens, and latex with statistical significance (p values 0.001, 0.016, and 0.017 respectively). Additionally, patients with sputum eosinophilia had lower ACT score, higher serum IgE level and higher serum eosinophil count. Total IgE had the highest diagnostic accuracy for discrimination of sputum eosinophilia among asthma patients. Pollen allergy and the severity of airway obstruction by spirometry were independent predictors of eosinophilic asthma.

Conclusion

Patients with eosinophilic asthma had more severe airway obstruction, lower ACT scores, higher serum IgE level, and serum eosinophil count. Pollen allergy and obstructive pattern by spirometry were independent predictors of eosinophilic asthma.

Clusters Based on Immune Markers in a Lithuanian Asthma Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Asthma is divided into various distinct phenotypes on the basis of clinical characteristics, physiological findings, and triggers, and phenotyping is usually performed in a hypothesis-driven univariate manner. However, phenotyping can also be performed using computer algorithms to evaluate hypotheses-free relationships among many clinical and biological characteristics. We aimed to identify asthma phenotypes based on multiple demographic, clinical, and immunological characteristics.

METHODS

Cluster analysis in R v3.5.0 was performed using asthma patient data. A total of 170 adult patients with asthma (diagnosed according to the GINA recommendations) were recruited to the study. All patients completed questionnaires about their smoking history and underwent physical examination, spirometry, skin-prick test, blood sample collection to evaluate peripheral blood cell counts and serum IgE, periostin, and interleukin (IL)-33 levels, as well as body mass index measurements. Data normality was checked with histograms and QQ plots. Hierarchical clustering was performed using Ward's linkage with Ward's clustering criterion. The optimal number of clusters was validated using the Dunn criterion as well as by comparing different clustering algorithms using the clValid package.

RESULTS

Three clusters characterizing asthma phenotypes were identified: (1) early-onset, highly atopic, and eosinophilic asthma associated with male sex and high levels of IL-33 and periostin; (2) late-onset, eosinophilic asthma associated with female sex and low levels of IL-33 and periostin; and (3) late-onset, obese, neutrophilic asthma associated with female sex, persistent airway obstruction, and very low IL-33 and periostin levels.

Contribution of allergy in the acquisition of uncontrolled severe asthma

Asthma is a multifactorial, heterogeneous disease that has a challenging management. It can be divided in non-allergic and allergic (usually associated with house dust mites (HDM) sensitization). There are several treatments options for asthma (corticosteroids, bronchodilators, antileukotrienes, anticholinergics,…); however, there is a subset of patients that do not respond to any of the treatments, who can display either a T2 or a non-T2 phenotype. A deeper understanding of the differential mechanisms underlying each phenotype will help to decipher the contribution of allergy to the acquisition of this uncontrolled severe phenotype. Here, we aim to elucidate the biological pathways associated to allergy in the uncontrolled severe asthmatic phenotype. To do so, twenty-three severe uncontrolled asthmatic patients both with and without HDM-allergy were recruited from Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin. A metabolomic fingerprint was obtained through liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, and identified metabolites were associated with their pathways. 9/23 patients had uncontrolled HDM-allergic asthma (UCA), whereas 14 had uncontrolled, non-allergic asthma (UCNA). 7/14 (50%) of the UCNA patients had Aspirin Exacerbated Respiratory Disease. There were no significant differences regarding gender or body mass index; but there were significant differences in age and onset age, which were higher in UCNA patients; and in total IgE, which was higher in UCA. The metabolic fingerprint revealed that 103 features were significantly different between UCNA and UCA (p < 0.05), with 97 being increased in UCA and 6 being decreased. We identified lysophosphocholines (LPC) 18:2, 18:3 and 20:4 (increased in UCA patients); and deoxycholic acid and palmitoleoylcarnitine (decreased in UCA). These metabolites were related with a higher activation of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and other phospholipid metabolism pathways. Our results show that allergy induces the activation of specific inflammatory pathways, such as the PLA2 pathway, which supports its role in the development of an uncontrolled asthma phenotype. There are also clinical differences, such as higher levels of IgE and earlier onset ages for the allergic asthmatic group, as expected. These results provide evidences to better understand the contribution of allergy to the establishment of a severe uncontrolled phenotype.

The NLRP3 inflammasome as a new target in respiratory disorders treatment

In recent years a continuous increase in new cases of respiratory disorders, such as rhinitis, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), has been observed. The exact pathomechanism of these diseases is still blurry, resulting in the lack of targeted and effective therapy. The conventional use of treatment strategies, such as antihistamine drugs and/or glucocorticosteroids act mainly symptomatically and have significant side effects. Specific allergen immunotherapy is only useful in the management of specific allergies and selected patients. Therefore, new therapeutic solutions are constantly being sought. The novelty of recent years has been the association between NLRP3 inflammasome activation and the development of airway inflammatory diseases. This seems to be an interesting therapeutic target that may support or even replace traditional therapies in the future. The review presented, discusses the contribution of NLRP3 inflammasome to the development of allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma, and COPD. Moreover, the modulatory properties of probiotics as potential inhibitors of NLRP3 inflammasome are emphasised.

Eosinophilic Asthma, Phenotypes-Endotypes and Current Biomarkers of Choice

Asthma phenotyping and endotyping are constantly evolving. Currently, several biologic agents have been developed towards a personalized approach to asthma management. This review will focus on different eosinophilic phenotypes and Th2-associated endotypes with eosinophilic inflammation. Additionally, airway remodeling is analyzed as a key feature of asthmatic eosinophilic endotypes. In addition, evidence of biomarkers is examined with a predictive value to identify patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma who may benefit from new treatment options. Finally, there will be a discussion on the results from clinical trials regarding severe eosinophilic asthma and how the inhibition of the eosinophilic pathway by targeted treatments has led to the reduction of recurrent exacerbations.

miR-144-3p Is a Biomarker Related to Severe Corticosteroid-Dependent Asthma

MicroRNAs are non-coding molecules that act both as regulators of the epigenetic landscape and as biomarkers for diseases, including asthma. In the era of personalized medicine, there is a need for novel disease-associated biomarkers that can help in classifying diseases into phenotypes for treatment selection. Currently, severe eosinophilic asthma is one of the most widely studied phenotypes in clinical practice, as many patients require higher and higher doses of corticosteroids, which in some cases fail to achieve the desired outcome. Such patients may only benefit from alternative drugs such as biologics, for which novel biomarkers are necessary. The objective of the study was to study the expression of miR-144-3p in order to discover its possible use as a diagnostic biomarker for severe asthma. For this purpose, miR-144-3p was evaluated in airway biopsies and serum from asthmatics and healthy individuals. mRNA was studied in asthmatic biopsies and smooth muscle cells transfected with miR-144-3p mimic. An in silico regulation of miR-144-3p was performed using miRSystem, miRDB, STRING, and ShinyGO for pathway analysis. From our experimental procedures, we found that miR-144-3p is a biomarker associated with asthma severity and corticosteroid treatment. MiR-144-3p is increased in asthmatic lungs, and its presence correlates directly with blood eosinophilia and with the expression of genes involved in asthma pathophysiology in the airways. When studied in serum, this miRNA was increased in severe asthmatics and associated with higher doses of corticosteroids, thereby making it a potential biomarker for severe asthma previously treated with higher doses of corticosteroids. Thus, we can conclude that miR-144-3p is associated with severe diseases in both the airways and serum of asthmatics, and this association is related to corticosteroid treatment.

The Korean Severe Asthma Registry (KoSAR): real world research in severe asthma

Severe asthma constitutes a serious health burden with significant morbidity and socioeconomic costs. The development and introduction of new biologics targeting type 2 inflammation changed the paradigm for management of severe asthma and initiated a biological era. These changes impose a challenge to clinicians in managing difficult-to-treat and severe asthma. To understand the characteristics and heterogeneity of severe asthma and to develop a better strategy to manage it, the Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Working Group on Severe Asthma, has organized the Korean Severe Asthma Registry (KoSAR). In this review, we describe the challenges of severe asthma management regarding diagnosis, disease burden, heterogeneity, guidelines, and organization of severe asthma clinics. This review also examines the current global activities of national and regional registries and study groups. In addition, we present the KoSAR vision and organization and describe the findings of KoSAR in comparison with those of other countries.

The onset, development and pathogenesis of severe neutrophilic asthma

Bronchial asthma is divided into Th2 high, Th2 low and mixed types. The Th2 high type is dominated by eosinophils while the Th2 low type is divided into neutrophilic and paucigranulocytic types. Eosinophilic asthma has gained increased attention recently, and its pathogenesis and treatment are well understood. However, severe neutrophilic asthma requires more in-depth research because its pathogenesis is not well understood, and no effective treatment exists. This review looks at the advances made in asthma research, the pathogenesis of neutrophilic asthma, the mechanisms of progression to severe asthma, risk factors for asthma exacerbations, and biomarkers and treatment of neutrophilic asthma. The pathogenesis of neutrophilic asthma is further discussed from four aspects: Th17-type inflammatory response, inflammasomes, exosomes and microRNAs. This review provides direction for the mechanistic study, diagnosis and treatment of neutrophilic asthma. The treatment of neutrophilic asthma remains a significant challenge for clinical therapists and is an important area of future clinical research.

Severe asthma in the era of COVID-19: A narrative review

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Severe asthma management during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a challenge and will continue to be, at least in the next few months, as herd immunity is still a mirage. A lot has to be learned about how COVID-19 affects underlying diseases, and severe asthma is no exception.

METHODS

Narrative review of papers available until February 2021 in PubMed and Google Scholar, relating severe asthma and COVID-19. Four main research topics were reviewed: SARS-CoV-2 infection: immunology and respiratory pathology; interrelationship of severe asthma endotypes and COVID-19 disease mechanisms; severe asthma epidemiology and COVID-19; and biologics for severe asthma in the context of COVID-19.

RESULTS

COVID-19 disease mechanisms start with upper respiratory cell infection, and afterwards several immunological facets are activated, contributing to disease severity, namely cell-mediated immunity and antibody production. Although infrequent in the COVID-19 course some patients develop a cytokine storm that causes organ damage and may lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome or multiorgan failure. Regarding severe asthma endotypes, type2-high might have a protective role both in infection risk and disease course. There is conflicting data regarding the epidemiological relationship between COVID-19 among severe asthma patients, with some studies reporting increased risk of infection and disease course, whereas others the other way round. Biologics for severe asthma do not seem to increase the risk of infection and severe COVID-19, although further evidence is needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Globally, in the era of COVID-19, major respiratory societies recommend continuing the biologic treatment, preferably in a self-home administration program.

Characterization of T2-Low and T2-High Asthma Phenotypes in Real-Life

Asthma is a heterogeneous and complex condition characterized by chronic airway inflammation, which may be clinically stratified into three main phenotypes: type 2 (T2) low, T2-high allergic, and T2-high non-allergic asthma. This real-world study investigated whether phenotyping patients with asthma using non-invasive parameters could be feasible to characterize the T2-low and T2-high asthma phenotypes in clinical practice. This cross-sectional observational study involved asthmatic outpatients (n = 503) referring to the Severe Asthma Centre of the San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital. Participants were stratified according to the patterns of T2 inflammation and atopic sensitization. Among outpatients, 98 (19.5%) patients had T2-low asthma, 127 (25.2%) T2-high non-allergic, and 278 (55.3%) had T2-high allergic phenotype. In comparison to T2-low, allergic patients were younger (OR 0.945, p < 0.001) and thinner (OR 0.913, p < 0.001), had lower smoke exposure (OR 0.975, p < 0.001) and RV/TLC% (OR 0.950, p < 0.001), higher prevalence of asthma severity grade 5 (OR 2.236, p < 0.05), more frequent rhinitis (OR 3.491, p < 0.001) and chronic rhinosinusitis with (OR 2.650, p < 0.001) or without (OR 1.919, p < 0.05) nasal polyps, but less common arterial hypertension (OR 0.331, p < 0.001). T2-high non-allergic patients had intermediate characteristics. Non-invasive phenotyping of asthmatic patients is possible in clinical practice. Identifying characteristics in the three main asthma phenotypes could pave the way for further investigations on useful biomarkers for precision medicine.

Advances and highlights in asthma in 2021

Last year brought a significant advance in asthma management, unyielding to the pressure of the pandemics. Novel key findings in asthma pathogenesis focus on the resident cell compartment, epigenetics and the innate immune system. The precision immunology unbiased approach was supplemented with novel tools and greatly facilitated by the use of artificial intelligence. Several randomised clinical trials and good quality real-world evidence shed new light on asthma treatment and supported the revision of several asthma guidelines (GINA, Expert Panel Report 3, ERS/ATS guidelines on severe asthma) and the conception of new ones (EAACI Guidelines for the use of biologicals in severe asthma). Integrating asthma management within the broader context of Planetary Health has been put forward. In this review, recently published articles and clinical trials are summarised and discussed with the goal to provide clinicians and researchers with a concise update on asthma research from a translational perspective.

Molecular allergology approach to allergic asthma

Allergic asthma is a frequently encountered and well described asthma phenotype. However, its precise mechanisms are less known. The tools for targeted selection of patients for an optimal response to intervention (prevention or treatment) are also lacking. Here we explore the potential of the molecular allergology approach to achieve a better understanding of allergic asthma mechanisms, a precise diagnosis and an optimal management of these patients.

Metabolomics, Microbiota, and In Vivo and In Vitro Biomarkers in Type 2 Severe Asthma: A Perspective Review

Precision medicine refers to the tailoring of therapeutic strategies to the individual characteristics of each patient; thus, it could be a new approach for the management of severe asthma that considers individual variability in genes, environmental exposure, and lifestyle. Precision medicine would also assist physicians in choosing the right treatment, the best timing of administration, consequently trying to maximize drug efficacy, and, possibly, reducing adverse events. Metabolomics is the systematic study of low molecular weight (bio)chemicals in a given biological system and offers a powerful approach to biomarker discovery and elucidating disease mechanisms. In this point of view, metabolomics could play a key role in targeting precision medicine.

Metabolomics, Microbiota, and In Vivo and In Vitro Biomarkers in Type 2 Severe Asthma: A Perspective Review

Precision medicine refers to the tailoring of therapeutic strategies to the individual characteristics of each patient; thus, it could be a new approach for the management of severe asthma that considers individual variability in genes, environmental exposure, and lifestyle. Precision medicine would also assist physicians in choosing the right treatment, the best timing of administration, consequently trying to maximize drug efficacy, and, possibly, reducing adverse events. Metabolomics is the systematic study of low molecular weight (bio)chemicals in a given biological system and offers a powerful approach to biomarker discovery and elucidating disease mechanisms. In this point of view, metabolomics could play a key role in targeting precision medicine.

New Insights into Asthma Inflammation: Focus on iNKT, MAIT, and γδT Cells

Asthma is a chronic immunological disease affecting all age groups, but often starting in childhood. Although it has long been ascribed to a single pathology, recent studies have highlighted its heterogeneity due to the potential involvement of various pathogenic mechanisms. Here, we present our current understanding of the role of innate-like T (ILT) cells in asthma pathogenesis. These cells constitute a specific family mainly comprising γδT, invariant natural killer (iNKT) and mucosal-associated invariant (MAIT) T cells. They all share the ability to massively secrete a wide range of cytokines in a T-cell receptor (TCR)-dependent or -independent manner. ILT cells are prevalent in mucosal tissues, including airways, where their innate and adaptive immune functions consist primarily in protecting tissue integrity. However, ILT cells may also have detrimental effects leading to asthma symptoms. The immune mechanisms through which this pathogenic effect occurs will be discussed in this overview.

Impact of Probiotic Bacteria on Respiratory Allergy Disorders

Respiratory allergy is a common disease with an increased prevalence worldwide. The effective remedy is still unknown, and a new therapeutic approach is highly desirable. The review elaborates the influence of probiotic bacteria on respiratory allergy prevention and treatment with particular emphasis on the impact of the current methods of their administration – oral and intranasal. The background of the respiratory allergy is complex thus, we focused on the usefulness of probiotics in the alleviation of different allergy factors, in particular involved in pathomechanism, local hypersensitive evidence and the importance of epithelial barrier. In this review, we have shown that (1) probiotic strains may vary in modulatory potential in respiratory allergy, (2) probiotic bacteria are beneficial in oral and intranasal administration, (3) recombinant probiotic bacteria can modulate the course of respiratory allergy.

Novel therapeutic approaches targeting endotypes of severe airway disease

Introduction: Severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), are heterogeneous diseases characterized by different mechanistic pathways (endotypes) and variable clinical presentations (phenotypes).Areas covered: This review provides the clinician with an overview of the prevalence and clinical impact of severe chronic upper and lower airways disease and suggests a novel therapeutic approach with biological agents with possible biomarkers. To select relevant literature for inclusion in this review, we conducted a literature search using the PubMed database, using terms 'severe airways disease' AND 'endotype' AND 'treatment.' The literature review was performed for publication years 2010-2020, restricting the articles to humans and English language publications.Expert opinion: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has brought forth many challenges for patients with severe airway disease and healthcare practitioners involved in care. These patients could have an increased risk of developing severe SARS-CoV-2 disease, although treatment with biologics is not associated with a worse prognosis. Eosinopenia on hospital admission plays a key role as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker.

The treatment of asthma using the Chinese Materia Medica

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Asthma is a costly global health problem that negatively influences the quality of life of patients. The Chinese Materia Medica (CMM) contains remedies that have been used for the treatment of asthma for millennia. This article strives to systematically summarize the current research progress so that more comprehensive examinations of various databases related to CMM anti-asthma drugs, can be performed, so as to sequentially provide effective basic data for development and application of anti-asthma drugs based on the CMM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The research data published over the past 20 years for asthma treatment based on traditional CMM remedies were retrieved and collected from libraries and online databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Elsevier, Spring Link, Web of Science, PubChem Compound, Wan Fang, CNKI, Baidu, and Google Scholar). Information was also added from classic CMM, literature, conference papers on classic herbal formulae, and dissertations (PhD or Masters) based on traditional Chinese medicine.

RESULTS

This review systematically summarizes the experimental studies on the treatment of asthma with CMM, covering the effective chemical components, typical asthma models, important mechanisms and traditional anti-asthma CMM formulae. The therapy value of the CMM for anti-asthma is clarified, and the original data and theoretical research foundation are provided for the development of new anti-asthmatic data and research for the CMM.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial progress against asthma has been made through relevant experimental research based on the CMM. These advances improved the theoretical basis of anti-asthma drugs for CMM and provided a theoretical basis for the application of a asthma treatment that is unique. By compiling these data, it is expected that the CMM will now contain a clearer mechanism of action and a greater amount of practical data that can be used for future anti-asthma drug research.

Circulating microRNA-15b-5p as a biomarker for asthma-COPD overlap

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear how to characterize different subtypes of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We previously described serum periostin and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40) as useful markers for asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are now recognized as markers for identifying the pathophysiological features in several diseases. This study aimed to identify circulating miRNAs that could discriminate patients with ACO from patients with asthma or COPD.

METHODS

This study included two independent cohorts. First, we screened 84 miRNAs for expression levels in patients with ACO (n = 6) or asthma (n = 6) using a quantitative real-time PCR array. The miRNAs showing at least a 2-fold difference in the discovery phase were analyzed in 30 patients each with asthma, COPD, or ACO in the replication phase. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

Nine miRNAs were identified in the discovery phase. Five of these miRNAs (miR-148a-3p, miR-15b-5p, miR-223-3p, miR-23a-3p, and miR-26b-5p) had lower levels in ACO patients and could discriminate between ACO patients and patients with either asthma or COPD. miR-15b-5p was the most accurate miRNA for the discrimination of patients with ACO (AUROC, 0.71). Moreover, the combined assessment of miR-15b-5p, serum periostin, and YKL-40 (AUROC, 0.80) improved diagnostic accuracy for ACO compared with the combined model of periostin and YKL-40 (AUROC, 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating miR-15b-5p is a potential marker for identifying patients with ACO. By elucidating the molecular pathways controlled by miRNAs, we may better understand the pathophysiology of ACO.

EAACI Biologicals Guidelines-Recommendations for severe asthma

Severe asthma imposes a significant burden on patients, families and healthcare systems. Management is difficult, due to disease heterogeneity, co-morbidities, complexity in care pathways and differences between national or regional healthcare systems. Better understanding of the mechanisms has enabled a stratified approach to the management of severe asthma, supporting the use of targeted treatments with biologicals. However, there are still many issues that require further clarification. These include selection of a certain biological (as they all target overlapping disease phenotypes), the definition of response, strategies to enhance the responder rate, the duration of treatment and its regimen (in the clinic or home-based) and its cost-effectiveness. The EAACI Guidelines on the use of biologicals in severe asthma follow the GRADE approach in formulating recommendations for each biological and each outcome. In addition, a management algorithm for the use of biologicals in the clinic is proposed, together with future approaches and research priorities.

Endo-phenotyping of COPD patients

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous syndrome and may comprise several different phenotypes that are driven by different molecular mechanisms (endotypes). Several different clinical, genetic, and inflammatory phenotypes of COPD have been recognized and this may lead to more precise effective therapies.

AREAS COVERED

The different clinical phenotypes, including smoking versus nonsmoking COPD, small airway disease versus emphysema, non-exacerbators versus frequent exacerbators are discussed. Rare genetic endotypes (alpha₁-antitrypsin deficiency, telomerase polymorphisms), and inflammatory phenotypes (eosinophilic versus neutrophilic) are also recognized in stable and exacerbating patients and have implications for the choice of therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical phenotypes have so far not proved to be very useful in selecting more personalized therapy for COPD. Even with genetic endotypes, this has not led to improved therapy. More promising is the recognition that COPD patients who have increased sputum or blood eosinophils tend to have more frequent exacerbations and inhaled corticosteroids are more effective in preventing exacerbation. Increased blood eosinophils have proved to be a useful biomarker now used to target ICS more effectively. Furthermore, COPD patients with low eosinophils are more likely to get pneumonia with ICS and to have lower airway bacterial colonization.

Equine Asthma: Current Understanding and Future Directions

The 2019 Havemeyer Workshop brought together researchers and clinicians to discuss the latest information on Equine Asthma and provide future research directions. Current clinical and molecular asthma phenotypes and endotypes in humans were discussed and compared to asthma phenotypes in horses. The role of infectious and non-infectious causes of equine asthma, genetic factors and proposed disease pathophysiology were reviewed. Diagnostic limitations were evident by the limited number of tests and biomarkers available to field practitioners. The participants emphasized the need for more accessible, standardized diagnostics that would help identify specific phenotypes and endotypes in order to create more targeted treatments or management strategies. One important outcome of the workshop was the creation of the Equine Asthma Group that will facilitate communication between veterinary practice and research communities through published and easily accessible guidelines and foster research collaboration.

Development and Characterization of an Allergic Asthma Rat Model for Interventional Studies

Allergic asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases of the airways, however it still remains underdiagnosed and hence undertreated. Therefore, an allergic asthma rat model would be useful to be applied in future therapeutic strategy studies. The aim of the present study was to develop an objective model of allergic asthma in atopic rats that allows the induction and quantification of anaphylactic shock with quantitative variables. Female Brown Norway rats were intraperitoneally sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA), alum and Bordetella pertussis toxin and boosted a week later with OVA in alum. At day 28, all rats received an intranasal challenge with OVA. Anaphylactic response was accurately assessed by changes in motor activity and body temperature. Leukotriene concentration was determined in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and total and IgE anti-OVA antibodies were quantified in blood and BALF samples. The asthmatic animals' motility and body temperature were reduced after the shock for at least 20 h. The asthmatic animals developed anti-OVA IgE antibodies both in BALF and in serum. These results show an effective and relatively rapid model of allergic asthma in female Brown Norway rats that allows the quantification of the anaphylactic response.

Outside-in hypothesis revisited: The role of microbial, epithelial, and immune interactions

OBJECTIVE

Our understanding of the origin of allergic diseases has increased in recent years, highlighting the importance of microbial dysbiosis and epithelial barrier dysfunction in affected tissues. Exploring the microbial-epithelial-immune crosstalk underlying the mechanisms of allergic diseases will allow the development of novel prevention and treatment strategies for allergic diseases.

DATA SOURCES

This review summarizes the recent advances in microbial, epithelial, and immune interactions in atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and asthma.

STUDY SELECTIONS

We performed a literature search, identifying relevant recent primary articles and review articles.

RESULTS

Dynamic crosstalk between the environmental factors and microbial, epithelial, and immune cells in the development of atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and asthma underlies the pathogenesis of these diseases. There is substantial evidence in the literature suggesting that environmental factors directly affect barrier function of the epithelium. In addition, T-helper 2 (T_H2) cells, type 2 innate lymphoid cells, and their cytokine interleukin 13 (IL-13) damage skin and lung barriers. The effects of environmental factors may at least in part be mediated by epigenetic mechanisms. Histone deacetylase activation by type 2 immune response has a major effect on leaky barriers and blocking of histone deacetylase activity corrects the defective barrier in human air-liquid interface cultures and mouse models of allergic asthma with rhinitis. We also present and discuss a novel device to detect and monitor skin barrier dysfunction, which provides an opportunity to rapidly and robustly assess disease severity.

CONCLUSION

A complex interplay between environmental factors, epithelium, and the immune system is involved in the development of systemic allergic diseases.

Efficacy and safety of treatment with dupilumab for severe asthma: A systematic review of the EAACI guidelines-Recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma

Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against interleukin-4 receptor α, is approved as add-on maintenance treatment for inadequately controlled type 2 severe asthma. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy, safety and economic impact of dupilumab compared to standard of care for uncontrolled severe asthma. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs and health economic evaluations. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. Three RCTs including 2735 subjects >12 years old and 24-52 weeks of follow-up were included. Dupilumab reduced with high certainty severe asthma exacerbations (Incidence rate ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.45-0.59) and the percentage use of oral corticosteroid use (mean difference (MD) -28.2 mg/d; 95% CI -40.7 to -15.7). Asthma control (ACQ-5), quality of life (AQLQ) and rescue medication use [puffs/d] improved, without reaching the minimal important clinical difference: ACQ-5 MD -0.28 (95% CI -0.39 to -0.17); AQLQ MD +0.28 (95% CI 0.20-0.37); and rescue medication MD -0.35 (95% CI -0.73 to +0.02). FEV₁ increased (MD +0.15; 95% CI +0.11 to +0.18) (moderate certainty). There was an increased rate of dupilumab-related adverse events (AEs) (moderate certainty) and of drug-related serious AEs (low certainty). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of dupilumab versus standard therapy was 464 000$/QALY (moderate certainty). More data on long-term safety are needed both for children and for adults, together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.

Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma. A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines - recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma

Five biologicals have been approved for severe eosinophilic asthma, a well-recognized phenotype. Systematic reviews (SR) evaluated the efficacy and safety of benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab (alphabetical order) compared to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs and health economic evaluations, published in English. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated for each of the biologicals. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. 19 RCTs (three RCTs for benralizumab, three RCTs for dupilumab, three RCTs for mepolizumab, five RCTs for omalizumab and five RCTs for reslizumab), including subjects 12 to 75 years old (except for omalizumab including also subjects 6-11 years old), ranging from 12 to 56 weeks were evaluated. All biologicals reduce exacerbation rates with high certainty of evidence: benralizumab incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.72), dupilumab (IRR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.59), mepolizumab IRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.66), omalizumab (IRR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.77) and reslizumab (IRR) 0.46 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.58). Benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab reduce the daily dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) with high certainty of evidence. All evaluated biologicals probably improve asthma control, QoL and FEV₁ , without reaching the minimal important difference (moderate certainty). Benralizumab, mepolizumab and reslizumab slightly increase drug-related adverse events (AE) and drug-related serious AE (low to very low certainty of evidence). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year value is above the willingness to pay threshold for all biologicals (moderate certainty). Potential savings are driven by decrease in hospitalizations, emergency and primary care visits. There is high certainty that all approved biologicals reduce the rate of severe asthma exacerbations and for benralizumab, dupilumab and mepolizumab for reducing OCS. There is moderate certainty for improving asthma control, QoL, FEV₁ . More data on long-term safety are needed together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.

Critical Points on the Use of Biologicals in Allergic Diseases and Asthma

Improved understanding of the contribution of immune-inflammatory mechanisms in allergic diseases and asthma has encouraged development of biologicals and small molecules specifically targeting the innate and adaptive immune response. There are several critical points impacting the efficacy of this stratified approach, from the complexity of disease endotypes to the effectiveness in real-world settings. We discuss here how these barriers can be overcome to facilitate the development of implementation science for allergic diseases and asthma.

Phenotypes and endotypes in eosinophilic esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

To improve understanding of the heterogeneous presentation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and its different potential phenotypes and endotypes.

DATA SOURCES

We reviewed studies addressing EoE genetics, risks, natural history, treatment, phenotype, or endotype to assess data relating to differences in the presentation of EoE in children and adults. This review was restricted to articles in the English language.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Data source abstracts, pertinent articles, and book chapters meeting the objectives were critically reviewed.

RESULTS

Data to support differing phenotypes and endotypes in EoE are emerging, but findings are based on multiple studies and therefore sometimes incomparable. Like other atopic disorders EoE is a complex disease with diverse clinical presentations (phenotypes) based on response to therapy, natural history, and association with atopic comorbidities. Different pathogenetic mechanisms (endotypes) may drive the multiple phenotypes. T Helper type 2 inflammation, epithelial barrier defects, enhanced fibrosis, and association with rare monogenetic diseases are the most described endotypes in EoE.

CONCLUSION

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an atopic disorder that is increasing in prevalence and can be difficult to treat. Better understanding of phenotypes and endotypes in EoE may enable future care to be individualized more effectively, resulting in shorter time to remission and fewer endoscopies.