Regional differences in the coverage and uptake of bariatric-metabolic surgery: A focus on type 2 diabetes

National usage of bariatric surgery for class I obesity: an analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program

BACKGROUND

National and international consensus statements, as well as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), support the use of bariatric surgery for the treatment of class I obesity. Despite this, most payors within the United States limit reimbursement to the outdated 1991 NIH guidelines or a similar adaptation.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the safety of bariatric surgery in patients with lower BMI compared with standard patients, as well as determine U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery in class I obesity in 2015-2019.

SETTING

A retrospective analysis was performed of the 2015-2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database.

METHODS

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients were divided into body mass index cohorts: class I obesity (<35 kg/m2) and severe obesity (≥35 kg/m2). Differences in preoperative patient selection and postoperative outcomes were established, and frequency trends were delineated.

RESULTS

Analysis included 760,192 surgeries with 8129 (1%) for patients with class I obesity. The patients with class I obesity were older, more commonly female, and with lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, but with higher rates of type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (P < .05). Variation was found for operative time, length of stay, 30-day readmission, and composite morbidity. Minimal annual variation was found for bariatric surgeries performed for patients with class I obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term safety of bariatric surgery in patients with class I obesity was corroborated by this study. Despite consensus statements and robust support, rates of bariatric surgery in patients with class I obesity have failed to increase and remain limited to 1%. This demonstrates the impact of the outdated 1991 NIH guidelines regarding access to care for these potentially life-saving surgeries.

Medicaid Expansion: the impact of health policy on bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Underutilization of bariatric surgery in uninsured and marginalized communities is well-documented. When discussing population health, healthcare access and equity are crucial components often influenced by health policy.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to determine if disparities in the use of bariatric surgery were influenced by changes in healthcare policy from the Affordable Care Act's 2014 expansion of Medicaid.

SETTING

A retrospective analysis of the 2012-2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample was performed for elective Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy surgeries performed within the United States.

METHODS

States were grouped into regions as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Medicaid as the primary payor for bariatric surgery was compared by region and year, as well as utilization by marginalized populations.

RESULTS

Analysis included 212,776 bariatric surgeries. Medicaid as the primary payor increased from 9% to 19% from 2012 to 2018. A greater share of bariatric surgeries with Medicaid as the primary payor was located in the Northeast and West, as compared with those located in the Midwest and South. Medicaid beneficiaries in marginalized communities (Black race, Hispanic race, lowest income quartile, rural communities) made up a larger share of the bariatric surgery population over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion improved health coverage and access to care, including bariatric surgery. An increase in bariatric surgeries among Medicaid beneficiaries correlated with the 2014 expansion of Medicaid. Social and economic disparities regarding bariatric surgery have improved though more progress may be seen with the adoption of Medicaid Expansion by the remaining U.S. states.

Tirzepatide for the treatment of obesity: Rationale and design of the SURMOUNT clinical development program

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a growing global concern compounded by limited availability of effective treatment options. The SURMOUNT development program aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention compared with placebo on chronic weight management in adults with BMI ≥ 27 kg/m² with or without type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

The SURMOUNT program includes four global phase 3 trials NCT04184622 (SURMOUNT-1), NCT04657003 (SURMOUNT-2), NCT04657016 (SURMOUNT-3), and NCT04660643 (SURMOUNT-4). Participants are randomized to once-weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide versus placebo in a double-blind manner. The primary end point in all trials is the percentage change in body weight from randomization to end of treatment. Results for the primary end point for SURMOUNT-1 were published recently and results for the other trials are expected in 2023.

RESULTS

Across trials, participants have a mean age of 44.9 to 54.2 years, are mostly female (50.7% to 69.7%), and have a mean BMI of 36.1 to 38.9.

CONCLUSIONS

The extensive assessment of once-weekly tirzepatide in the global SURMOUNT program will detail the clinical effects of this first-in-class glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in chronic weight management.

Glycemic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery compared with routine care: a population-based, real-world cohort study in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have shown that bariatric surgery (BS) is associated with better glycemic control and diabetes remission in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared with routine care.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a real-world population-based study examining the impact of BS on glycemic control and medications in patients with T2D.

SETTING AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, matched, controlled cohort study conducted between January 1, 1990, and January 31, 2018, using IQVIA Medical Research Data, a primary care electronic records database. Adults with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m² and T2D who had BS (surgical) were matched for age, sex, BMI, and diabetes duration to two controls (with T2D and no BS).

RESULTS

A total of 1126 patients in the surgical group and 2219 patients in the control group were analyzed. Mean (standard deviation) age was 50.0 (9.3) years, 67.6% were women, baseline glycocylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) was 7.8% (1.7 mmol/mol), and diabetes duration was 4.7 years (range, 2.0-8.4 years). Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 3.6 years (1.7-5.9 years), a higher proportion of patients in the surgical group achieved an HbA1C of ≤6.0% than the control group (65.8% versus 22.8%). The surgical group showed a decrease in mean HbA1C of 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4%-1.7%), 1.4% (1.2%-1.5%), and 1.3% (1.1%-1.5%) at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up, respectively, whereas HbA1C increased in the control group. The proportion of patients receiving glucose-lowering medications decreased in the surgical group (92.2% to 66.5%) but increased in the control group (85.3% to 90.2%).

CONCLUSION

BS is associated with significant improvement in glycemic control, achievement of normal HbA1C levels, and reduced need for glucose-lowering therapy in patients with T2D.

The Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Utilization of Bariatric Surgery

INTRODUCTION

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded Medicaid (ME) and instituted Essential Health Benefits (EHB) that included bariatric surgery coverage on a state-by-state opt-in basis, increasing insurance coverage of bariatric surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a difference-in-differences framework, changes in bariatric surgery rates, defined as utilization in the population of people with obesity, before and after the ACA were evaluated in four states. Bariatric surgery procedure data were taken from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State In-patient Database 2012-2015. Adjusted multivariable regressions were run in the Medicaid and commercially insured populations.

RESULTS

We identified 36,456 bariatric surgeries across the 286 Health Service Areas and time periods, with 31,732 covered by commercial insurers and 4724 covered by Medicaid. An unadjusted increase in utilization rates was seen in the Medicaid and Commercial populations in both ME- and EHB-covered states as well as non-expansion and EHB opt-out states over time. In the Medicaid population, after adjusting for confounders, there was a significant increase of 24.77 cases per 100,000 people with obesity (95% confidence interval: 12.41, 37.13) in the expansion states relative to the control and pre-period. The commercial population experienced a nonsignificant change in the rates of bariatric surgery, decreasing by 2.89 cases per 100,000 people with obesity (95% confidence interval: - 21.59, 15.81).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant increase in bariatric surgery rates among Medicaid beneficiaries associated with Medicaid expansion, but there was no change among the commercially insured.

Network Meta-Analysis of Metabolic Surgery Procedures for the Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes

Background

Metabolic surgery is part of a well-established treatment intensification strategy for obesity and its related comorbidities including type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are the most commonly performed metabolic surgeries worldwide, but comparative efficacy is uncertain. This study employed network meta-analysis to compare weight loss, T2DM remission and perioperative complications in adults between RYGB, SG and OAGB.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, trial registries were searched for randomised trials comparing RYGB, SG and OAGB. Study outcomes were excess weight loss (at 1, 2 and 3–5 years), trial-defined T2DM remission at any time point and perioperative complications.

Results

Twenty randomised controlled trials were included involving 1803 patients investigating the three metabolic surgical interventions. RYGB was the index for comparison. The excess weight loss (EWL) demonstrated minor differences at 1 and 2 years, but no differences between interventions at 3–5 years. T2DM remission was more likely to occur with either RYGB or OAGB when compared to SG. Perioperative complications were higher with RYGB when compared to either SG or OAGB. Two-way analysis of EWL and T2DM remission against the risk of perioperative complications demonstrated OAGB was the most positive on this assessment at all time points.

Conclusion

OAGB offers comparable metabolic control through weight loss and T2DM remission to RYGB and SG whilst minimising perioperative complications.

Registration number: CRD42020199779 (https:// www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO)

Graphical abstract

Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Utilisation in Patients With and Without Diabetes: Data from the IFSO Global Registry 2015-2018

BACKGROUND

Comparative international practice of patients undergoing bariatric-metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is unknown. We aimed to ascertain baseline age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and types of operations performed for patients with T2DM submitted to the IFSO Global Registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of patients having primary surgery in 2015-2018 for countries with ≥90% T2DM data completion and ≥ 1000 submitted records.

RESULTS

Fifteen countries including 11 national registries met the inclusion criteria. The rate of T2DM was 24.2% (99,537 of 411,581 patients, country range 12.0-55.1%) and 77.1% of all patients were women. In every country, patients with T2DM were older than those without T2DM (overall mean age 49.2 [SD 11.4] years vs 41.8 [11.9] years, all p < 0.001). Men were more likely to have T2DM than women, odds ratio (OR) 1.68 (95% CI 1.65-1.71), p < 0.001. Men showed higher rates of T2DM for BMI <35 kg/m2 compared to BMI ≥35.0 kg/m2, OR 2.76 (2.52-3.03), p < 0.001. This was not seen in women, OR 0.78 (0.73-0.83), p < 0.001. Sleeve gastrectomy was the commonest operation overall, but less frequent for patients with T2DM, patients with T2DM 54.9% vs without T2DM 65.8%, OR 0.63 (0.63-0.64), p < 0.001. Twelve out of 15 countries had higher proportions of gastric bypass compared to non-bypass operations for T2DM, OR 1.70 (1.67-1.72), p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Patients with T2DM had different characteristics to those without T2DM. Older men were more likely to have T2DM, with higher rates of BMI <35 kg/m2 and increased likelihood of food rerouting operations.

Association of metabolic-bariatric surgery with long-term survival in adults with and without diabetes: a one-stage meta-analysis of matched cohort and prospective controlled studies with 174 772 participants

BACKGROUND

Metabolic-bariatric surgery delivers substantial weight loss and can induce remission or improvement of obesity-related risks and complications. However, more robust estimates of its effect on long-term mortality and life expectancy-especially stratified by pre-existing diabetes status-are needed to guide policy and facilitate patient counselling. We compared long-term survival outcomes of severely obese patients who received metabolic-bariatric surgery versus usual care.

METHODS

We did a prespecified one-stage meta-analysis using patient-level survival data reconstructed from prospective controlled trials and high-quality matched cohort studies. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and MEDLINE (via Ovid) for randomised trials, prospective controlled studies, and matched cohort studies comparing all-cause mortality after metabolic-bariatric surgery versus non-surgical management of obesity published between inception and Feb 3, 2021. We also searched grey literature by reviewing bibliographies of included studies as well as review articles. Shared-frailty (ie, random-effects) and stratified Cox models were fitted to compare all-cause mortality of adults with obesity who underwent metabolic-bariatric surgery compared with matched controls who received usual care, taking into account clustering of participants at the study level. We also computed numbers needed to treat, and extrapolated life expectancy using Gompertz proportional-hazards modelling. The study protocol is prospectively registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42020218472.

FINDINGS

Among 1470 articles identified, 16 matched cohort studies and one prospective controlled trial were included in the analysis. 7712 deaths occurred during 1·2 million patient-years. In the overall population consisting 174 772 participants, metabolic-bariatric surgery was associated with a reduction in hazard rate of death of 49·2% (95% CI 46·3-51·9, p<0·0001) and median life expectancy was 6·1 years (95% CI 5·2-6·9) longer than usual care. In subgroup analyses, both individuals with (hazard ratio 0·409, 95% CI 0·370-0·453, p<0·0001) or without (0·704, 0·588-0·843, p<0·0001) baseline diabetes who underwent metabolic-bariatric surgery had lower rates of all-cause mortality, but the treatment effect was considerably greater for those with diabetes (between-subgroup I² 95·7%, p<0·0001). Median life expectancy was 9·3 years (95% CI 7·1-11·8) longer for patients with diabetes in the surgery group than the non-surgical group, whereas the life expectancy gain was 5·1 years (2·0-9·3) for patients without diabetes. The numbers needed to treat to prevent one additional death over a 10-year time frame were 8·4 (95% CI 7·8-9·1) for adults with diabetes and 29·8 (21·2-56·8) for those without diabetes. Treatment effects did not appear to differ between gastric bypass, banding, and sleeve gastrectomy (I² 3·4%, p=0·36). By leveraging the results of this meta-analysis and other published data, we estimated that every 1·0% increase in metabolic-bariatric surgery utilisation rates among the global pool of metabolic-bariatric candidates with and without diabetes could yield 5·1 million and 6·6 million potential life-years, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Among adults with obesity, metabolic-bariatric surgery is associated with substantially lower all-cause mortality rates and longer life expectancy than usual obesity management. Survival benefits are much more pronounced for people with pre-existing diabetes than those without.

FUNDING

None.

Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity

People with obesity commonly face a pervasive, resilient form of social stigma. They are often subject to discrimination in the workplace as well as in educational and healthcare settings. Research indicates that weight stigma can cause physical and psychological harm, and that affected individuals are less likely to receive adequate care. For these reasons, weight stigma damages health, undermines human and social rights, and is unacceptable in modern societies. To inform healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the public about this issue, a multidisciplinary group of international experts, including representatives of scientific organizations, reviewed available evidence on the causes and harms of weight stigma and, using a modified Delphi process, developed a joint consensus statement with recommendations to eliminate weight bias. Academic institutions, professional organizations, media, public-health authorities, and governments should encourage education about weight stigma to facilitate a new public narrative about obesity, coherent with modern scientific knowledge.

Adult obesity complications: challenges and clinical impact

The complications associated with adult obesity are overwhelming national healthcare systems. No country has yet implemented a successful population-level strategy to reverse the rising trends of obesity. This article presents epidemiological data on the complications of adult obesity and discusses some of the challenges associated with managing this disease at a population and individual level.

Bad words: why language counts in our work with bariatric patients

Language is powerful. Our words convey our impressions, attitudes, and worldview. Language not only reflects, but also shapes, the way that we think. In the field of bariatric-metabolic surgery, it is critical for clinicians to choose our language thoughtfully. In this paper, we demonstrate the importance of language choices in our clinical work and our professional communications; explore the potential pitfalls of words and phrases commonly used in the field of obesity; and encourage the use of more productive language choices in our communications with patients and professional colleagues, both within and outside of our field.

[The place of bariatric surgery in the management of obesity]

Surgical treatment of obesity, also called "bariatric surgery", is the reference treatment for severe and morbid forms of obesity after proper multidisciplinary medical treatment has failed. However, it is only one step in the pathway of the obese patient and should only be envisaged in the framework of lifelong nutritional care.