Abdominal thrombotic complications following bariatric surgery

Portomesenteric Venous Thrombosis after Bariatric Surgery: A Case Series and Systematic Review Comparing LSG and LRYGB

(1) Background: Portomesenteric Venous Thrombosis (PMVT) is a rare but serious complication of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS). Although more frequently reported after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), the risk factors for PMVT remain unclear. This study aims to compare the incidence and determinants of PMVT between LSG and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis of 5235 MBSs conducted at our institution between 2015 and 2023 identified five cases of PMVT. Additionally, a systematic review in March 2023, covering PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, was performed. Several data were analyzed regarding risk factors. (3) Results: In our case series, the incidence of PMVT was 0.1%. The five cases described involved four females with a BMI between 39.7 and 56.0 kg/m2. Their comorbidities were associated with metabolic syndrome, all women used oral contraceptive and two patients were diagnosed with thrombophilia or pulmonary embolism. Per protocol, thromboprophylaxis was administered to all patients. Diagnosis was made at a median of 16 days post-surgery, with abdominal pain being the main presenting symptom. Acute cases were managed with enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin and fibrinolysis. One patient required surgery. Ten studies were included in the systematic review and 205 patients with PMVT were identified: 193 (94.1%) post-LSG and 12 post-LRYGB. The most common comorbidities were dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, sleep apnea and liver disorders; (4) Conclusions: PMVT is a potentially life-threatening complication after MBS, requiring preventive measures, timely diagnosis and several treatments. Our findings suggest a higher occurrence in women with an elevated BMI and post-LSG. Tailored thromboprophylaxis for MBS patients at risk of PMVT may be warranted.

Routine extended (30 days) chemoprophylaxis for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy may reduce Portomesenteric vein thrombosis rates

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT), is a major complication of sleeve gastrectomy (SG). We changed our practice in July 2021 to routinely discharge all SG patients postoperatively with extended chemoprophylaxis for 30 days.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of routine extended chemoprophylaxis compared to 2 prior timeframes using selective extended chemoprophylaxis.

SETTING

University Hospital.

METHODS

Between 2012-2018, SG patients were discharged on extended chemoprophylaxis for patients deemed "high-risk" for VTE, including patients with body mass index (BMI) >50, and previous VTE. Between 2018-2021, extended chemoprophylaxis was broadened to include patients with positive preoperative thrombophilia panels (including Factor VIII). After 2021, all SG were routinely discharged on extended chemoprophylaxis. The typical regimen was 30 days Lovenox BID (40-mg twice daily for BMI> 40, 60-mg twice daily for BMI >60). Outcomes evaluated were rate of VTE/PMVT and postoperative bleed, including delayed bleed.

RESULTS

A total of 8864 patients underwent SG. Average age and BMI were 37.5 years and 43.0 kg/m2, respectively. The overall incidence of PMVT was 33/8864 (.37%). Converting from selective extended chemoprophylaxis (Group 1) to routine extended chemoprophylaxis (Group 3) decreased the rate of PMVT from .55% to .21% (P = .13). There was a significantly higher overall bleeding rate (.85%), including delayed bleeds (.34%) in the routine extended chemoprophylaxis patients (P < .05). These bleeds were mainly managed nonoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine extended (30 day) chemoprophylaxis for all SG may reduce PMVT rate but lead to a higher bleeding rate post-operatively. The vast majority of the increased bleeds are delayed and can be managed non-operatively.

Long-Term Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Approximately 3% of patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) are receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy (CAT) prior to operation. The management of these patients is complex, as it involves balancing the potential risk of thrombosis against that of bleeding. Our primary objective is to assess the long-term bleeding risk in patients undergoing MBS. We also aim to observe the trends in anticoagulant dosing after MBS.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent either primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with preoperative CAT between 2008 and 2022 was performed. Data on baseline demographics, indication for anticoagulation, type of CAT, and dosing were collected. Events of bleeding and the CAT at event were subsequently evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients (82 RYGB and 50 SG) initially on CAT were identified, with atrial fibrillation being the most common indication. Incidence of long-term bleeding was significantly higher in the RYGB group (18.3%) compared to the SG group (4%) (p = 0.017) over a total of 5.2 ± 3.8 years. Bleeding marginal ulcer (MU) was the most common cause of bleeding in the RYGB group (13.4%). 84.2% of all bleeding events occurred in patients on chronic Warfarin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Long-term CAT is associated with an increased risk of bleeding in RYGB patients, particularly MU bleeds. Patients on CAT seeking MBS should be counseled regarding this risk and potential implications. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants offer promise as an alternative to Warfarin in these patients; further research is necessary to better understand their safety.

Multiple Thrombotic, Infectious, and Cardiopulmonary Complications Following Laparoscopic Converted to Open Colectomy Procedure: A Case Report and Literature Review

All surgeries, from minor procedures, such as sutures, to major surgeries, such as open abdominal surgery, carry with them risk for complications. Among the most frequently encountered complications are surgical site infections and thrombotic complications. Less frequently, cardiac complications such as atrial fibrillation are seen. In this case report, we discuss the various complications encountered during the hospital stay of a 61-year-old male following a laparoscopic converted to open colectomy procedure for the treatment of a colorectal mass. Following surgery, a surgical pathology report revealed a newly diagnosed stage 3b colorectal adenocarcinoma. Multiple abscesses in the abdominopelvic cavity were discovered on computed tomography (CT), revealing a major surgical site infectious process. These findings warranted emergent surgical intervention and placement of multiple Jackson-Pratt drains. Due to previously untreated carcinoma promoting a prothrombotic state, the patient developed numerous thrombotic complications such as segmental pulmonary embolism, superior mesenteric vein thrombosis, and superficial thrombophlebitis of the saphenous veins. He also developed new-onset paroxysmal atrial fibrillation secondary to postoperative pain, as well as bilateral pleural effusions. Here, we shed light on the mechanisms of development of such complications, as well as the management and methods for prevention.

Portomesenteric Vein Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 101,914 Patients

INTRODUCTION

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The rising prevalence of SG has led to a surge in the occurrence of PMVT, while the associated risk factors have not been fully elucidated. This study aims to determine the incidence and risk factors of PMVT in patients undergoing SG.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE databases. Proportion and regression meta-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

In a total of 76 studies including 101,914 patients undergoing SG, we identified 357 patients with PMVT. Mean follow-up was 14.4 (SD: 16.3) months. The incidence of PMVT was found to be 0.50% (95%CI: 0.40-0.61%). The majority of the population presented with abdominal pain (91.8%) at an average of 22.4 days postoperatively and PMVT was mainly diagnosed with computed tomography (CT) (96.0%). Hematologic abnormalities predisposing to thrombophilia were identified in 34.9% of the population. Advanced age (p=0.02) and low center volume (p <0.0001) were significantly associated with PMVT, while gender, BMI, hematologic abnormality, prior history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, type of prophylactic anticoagulation, and duration of prophylactic anticoagulation were not associated with the incidence of PMVT in meta-regression analyses. Treatment included therapeutic anticoagulation in 93.4% and the mortality rate was 4/357 (1.1%).

CONCLUSION

PMVT is a rare complication of sleeve gastrectomy with an incidence rate <1% that is associated with low center volume and advanced age but is not affected by the duration or type of thromboprophylaxis administered postoperatively.

The efficacy of various Enoxaparin dosing regimens in general surgery patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing surgical procedures are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism events. A fixed Enoxaparin dosing regimen is the standard of care for chemoprophylaxis in most institutions; however, breakthrough venous thromboembolism events are still reported. We aimed to systematically review the literature to determine the ability of various Enoxaparin dosing regimens to achieve adequate prophylactic anti-Xa levels for venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalized general surgery patients. Additionally, we aimed to assess the correlation between subprophylactic anti-Xa levels and the development of clinically significant venous thromboembolism events.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using major databases from January 1, 1993, to February 17, 2023. Two independent researchers screened titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review. Articles were included if Enoxaparin dosing regimens were evaluated by anti-Xa levels. Exclusion criteria included systematic reviews, pediatric population, nongeneral surgery (defined as trauma, orthopedics, plastics, and neurosurgery), and non-Enoxaparin chemoprophylaxis. The primary outcome was peak Anti-Xa level measured at steady state concentration. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized studies-of Intervention tool.

RESULTS

A total of 6,760 articles were extracted, of which 19 were included in the scoping review. Nine studies included bariatric patients, whereas 5 studies explored abdominal surgical oncology patients. Three studies assessed thoracic surgery patients, and 2 studies included patients undergoing "general surgery" procedures. A total of 1,502 patients were included. The mean age was 47 years, and 38% were males. The percentages of patients reaching adequate prophylactic anti-Xa levels were 39%, 61%, 15%, 50%, and 78% across the 40 mg daily, 40 mg twice daily, 30 mg twice daily, and weight-tiered, and body mass index-based groups, respectively. The overall risk of bias was low to moderate.

CONCLUSION

Fixed Enoxaparin dosing regimens are not correlated with adequate anti-Xa levels in general surgery patients. Additional research is warranted to assess the efficacy of dosing regimens based on novel physiologic parameters (such as estimated blood volume).

Timing of Bariatric Surgery and COVID-19 Vaccination: Experience From a High-volume Single Center

BACKGROUND

During the last year, there was a large COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Italy. Concurrently, metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) restarted after a long period of discontinuity. No data are currently available on the best timing of COVID-19 vaccination for MBS candidates. The aim of this study was to report MBS outcomes in relation to the timing of COVID-19 vaccine administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was utilized to locate patients undergoing MBS between January 1 and December 31, 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients receiving a vaccine dose within 30 days before or after surgery (Group±30); and patients with a longer time interval of vaccine dose before or after surgery (Group>±30). Postoperative outcomes were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were included: 33 (30.6%) of whom were in Group±30 and 74(69.4%) in Group>30. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. Findings revealed that postoperative outcomes (ie, 30-d complications and length of stay postoperatively) were comparable between groups. Two patients in the ±30 group had mesenteric vein thrombosis after sleeve gastrectomy (SG); however, the rate of thrombosis events was comparable between groups ( P =0.09). Thrombosis between SG patients were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 vaccination within 30 days of MBS does not impact complication rates and length of stay. COVID-19 vaccination may have a negative impact on venous thrombosis after SG, but this study is underpowered to draw this conclusion. Larger studies should be conducted to replicate current study findings.

Propensity score matching analysis comparing outcomes between primary and revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after adjustable gastric banding: a retrospective record-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

One-stage revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB) after Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is widely adopted, but its safety is still debated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare outcomes between primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (PRYGB and RRYGB after LAGB.

METHOD

A retrospective record-based cohort study of patients who underwent PRYGB and RRYGB for failed LAGB and completed at least 2 years of follow-up from 2008 to 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to obtain a balanced sample of patients with RRYGB and PRYGB interventions by adjusting for baseline covariates including age and sex.

RESULTS

Patients with PRYGB (n = 558) and RRYGB (n = 156) were included. PSM identified 98 patients for RRYGB and 98 patients for PRYGB. Both cohorts exhibited significant reductions in BMI compared to baseline values (p < 0.001), but reductions were significantly higher in PRYGB compared to those in RRGYB at 6 months (- 10.55 ± 8.54 vs. - 8.38 ± 5.07; p = 0.032), 1-year (- 21.50 ± 8.19 vs. 16.14 ± 6.93; p < 0.001), and 2 years (- 24.02 ± 7.85 vs. - 18.93 ± 6.80; p < 0.001), respectively. A significant improvement in food tolerance from the 1st to the 2nd year was seen after RYGB (p < 0.001). The rates of early and late complications were similar in both cohorts (p = 0.537, p = 1.00). Overall re-intervention rates were 5.1 and 3.1% for RRYGB and PRYGB p = 0.721). Both cohorts exhibited significant improvement in comorbidities after 2 years (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage RRYGB for failed LAGB is safe and effective with comparable rates of complications, re-interventions, and resolution of associated comorbid conditions compared to PRYGB.

Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacoprophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacoprophylaxis regimens for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. A total of 15 studies were included. Low molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) and fondaparinux may be equally effective in reducing VTE risk (OR 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-7.39). Pooled estimate suggested uncertain effects of augmented LMWH dosing on VTE prophylaxis compared with standard dosing (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.07-4.39), but may increase major bleeding (OR 3.03, 95% CI 0.38-23.96). Very low-quality evidence showed an inconclusive effect of extended prophylaxis on VTE (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.15-1.90) and major bleeding (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.92-1.68) compared with restricted prophylaxis. Standard LMWH dosing may be effective and safe. Current evidences are insufficient to support extended prophylaxis.

Portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Portal venous system thrombosis can develop after bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the incidence of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery and clarify the role of anticoagulation for the prevention of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The incidence of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery was pooled by a random-effect model. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the incidence of portal venous system thrombosis according to the average duration of prophylactic anticoagulation (extended versus short-term). Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Among 2,714 papers initially screened, 68 studies were included. Among 100,964 patients undergoing bariatric surgery, 300 developed portal venous system thrombosis. The pooled overall incidence of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery was 0.419% (95% confidence interval: 0.341%-0.505%). The pooled incidence of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery was numerically lower in patients who received extended prophylactic anticoagulation protocol after bariatric surgery than those who received short-term prophylactic anticoagulation protocol (0.184% vs 0.459%). Meta-regression analyses demonstrated that sample size (P = .006), type of surgery (P < .001), and average duration of prophylactic anticoagulation (P = .024) might be sources of heterogeneity, but not region, publication year, history of bariatric surgery, follow-up duration, or use of prophylactic anticoagulation. Sensitivity analyses could not identify any source of heterogeneity. The estimated mortality of portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery was 1.33%.

CONCLUSION

Portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery is rare, but potentially lethal. Extended prophylactic anticoagulation protocol may be considered in patients at a high risk of developing portal venous system thrombosis after bariatric surgery.

Dosage of Anticoagulants in Obesity: Recommendations Based on a Systematic Review

Anticoagulants are frequently used as thromboprophylaxis and in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE). While obesity rates are reaching epidemic proportions worldwide, the optimal dosage for obese patients has not been established for most anticoagulants, including low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC), and pentasaccharides (fondaparinux). The aim of the present systematic review was to summarize the current knowledge and provide recommendations on dosage of LMWH, NOAC, and fondaparinux in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m² or body weight ≥ 100 kg). Based on a systematic search in PubMed and Embase, a total of 72 studies were identified. For thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in bariatric surgery (n = 20 studies), enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily, dalteparin 5,000 IE twice daily, or tinzaparin 75 IU/kg once daily should be considered for patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m². For thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in nonbariatric surgery and in medical inpatients (n = 8 studies), enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg once or twice daily or tinzaparin 75 IU/kg once daily may be considered in obese patients. For treatment with LMWH (n = 18 studies), a reduced weight-based dose of enoxaparin 0.8 mg/kg twice daily should be considered in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m², and no dose capping of dalteparin and tinzaparin should be applied for body weight < 140 kg. As regards NOAC, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or dabigatran may be used as thromboprophylaxis in patients with BMI < 40 kg/m² (n = 4 studies), whereas rivaroxaban and apixaban may be administered to obese patients with VTE or AF, including BMI > 40 kg/m², at standard fixed-dose (n = 20 studies). The limited available evidence on fondaparinux (n = 3 studies) indicated that the treatment dose should be increased to 10 mg once daily in patients weighing > 100 kg.

Portomesenteric thrombosis after robotic sleeve gastrectomy

Portomesenteric thrombosis is an important but rarely reported complication following bariatric surgery. It has been suggested that the incidence of portal vein thrombosis is directly related to many risk factors inherent in the bariatric population as well as factors related to local and systemic effects of laparoscopic surgery. Possible aetiologies vary from systemic inherited hypercoagulable states to a direct inflammatory reaction of portosystemic vessels. Here we present a case report of a 47-year-old obese women who underwent a robotic sleeve gastrectomy with subsequent development of a main portal vein, complete right intrahepatic portal vein and splenic vein thrombosis ultimately found to have a compound mutation of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C alleles.

Prophylaxis with rivaroxaban after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy could reduce the frequency of portomesenteric venous thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

Portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis is a rare but potentially serious complication after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. There are no consistent studies that prove the safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The objective was to evaluate the effect of rivaroxaban on the frequency of portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis and its safety profile after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data includes all laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies performed by a single surgeon at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Hospital between January 2009 and June 2019. All patients received low molecular weight heparin thromboprophylaxis during the whole hospital stay. Between July 2012 and June 2019, patients received additional post-discharge thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban. Patient demographics, impaired renal, post-surgical portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis, and bleeding episodes were registered.

RESULTS

A total of 516 patients were identified; 95 patients were excluded. Results for 421 patients were analysed: 198 received only intrahospital thromboprophylaxis (group 1) and 223 received additional post-discharge thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban (group 2). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups concerning age, sex and body mass index. In group 1, four cases of portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis were registered and no cases were reported in group 2 (p < 0.05). All cases occurred before 30 days after surgery. No bleeding episodes and no adverse reactions were detected in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Thromboprophylaxis during the whole hospital stay (two to three days), followed by rivaroxaban 10mg once daily for 10 days after discharge (completing in total 13-14 days of prophylaxis), could reduce cases of post-surgical portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis without an increase in bleeding complications.

Assessment of empiric body mass index-based thromboprophylactic dosing of enoxaparin after bariatric surgery: evidence for dosage adjustment using anti-factor Xa in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND

Despite thromboprophylaxis, postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism occur after bariatric surgery, perhaps because of failure to achieve optimal prophylactic levels in the obese population.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of prophylactic dosing of enoxaparin in patients with severe obesity by performing an antifactor Xa (AFXa) assay.

SETTING

An academic medical center METHODS: In this observational study, all bariatric surgery cases at an academic center between December 2016 and April 2017 who empirically received prophylactic enoxaparin (adjusted by body mass index [BMI] threshold of 50 kg/m²) were studied. The AFXa was measured 3-5 hours after the second dose of enoxaparin.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were included; 85% were female with a median age of 47 years. In total, 16 patients (15.2%) had AFXa levels outside the prophylactic range: 4 (3.8%) cases were in the subprophylactic and 12 (11.4%) cases were in the supraprophylactic range. Seventy patients had a BMI <50 kg/m² and empirically received enoxaparin 40 mg every 12 hours; AFXa was subprophylactic in 4 (5.7%) and supraprophylactic in 6 (8.6%) of these patients. Of the 35 patients with a BMI ≥50 who empirically received enoxaparin 60 mg q12h, no AFXa was subprophylactic and 6 (17.1%) were supraprophylactic. Five patients (4.8%) had major bleeding complications. One patient developed pulmonary embolism on postoperative day 35.

CONCLUSION

BMI-based thromboprophylactic dosing of enoxaparin after bariatric surgery could be suboptimal in 15% of patients with obesity. Overdosing of prophylactic enoxaparin can occur more commonly than underdosing. AFXa testing can be a practical way to measure adequacy of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, especially in patients who are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism or bleeding.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPG) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists boards of directors in adherence to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPG, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include contextualization in an adiposity-based, chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based, and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current healthcare arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Splenectomy fails to attenuate immuno-hematologic changes after rodent vertical sleeve gastrectomy

Bariatric surgery is on the rise for long-term weight loss and produces various positive metabolic health benefits. The mechanisms that produce surgical weight loss are not yet fully understood. Previous studies showed vertical sleeve gastrectomy prior to gestation resulted in reduced peripheral blood lymphocytes measured during pregnancy due to an undetermined etiology. Further, elevated splenic weight has been associated with vertical sleeve gastrectomy surgery. We hypothesized that perhaps altered splenic filtration was trapping circulating lymphocytes and thus reducing peripheral blood lymphocytes in circulation and contributing to increased spleen weight. We posited whether removal of the spleen concomitant with the stomach surgery may result in an improved immune phenotype. We evaluated female long Evans rats having received Sham surgery or vertical sleeve gastrectomy, with or without splenectomy to determine the contribution of the spleen on metabolic and immune factors after vertical sleeve gastrectomy. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy animals lost significant amounts of body mass and fat mass and ate less in comparison to Sham females during the first five post-operative weeks, but there was no specific effect of the loss of spleen on body mass, fat mass, or food intake. During the post-operative week 6, animals were euthanized and blood recovered for cell sorting of immune cells. There was a reduction in CD3+ total T cells, CD3/CD4+ helper T cells, and CD3/CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, main effect of both bariatric surgery (P  < 0.0001) and splenectomy (P  < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a significant increase in CD45RA+ B cells as a result of splenectomy (P  < 0.001), but a significant reduction in B cells as a result of VSG surgery (P  < 0.05). The changes in total T cells but not B cells were strongly correlated with fat mass. Further studies are needed to understand the cause of the immune changes after surgical weight loss.

Incidence of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis After Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Abdominal surgery may increase the risk of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). We determined the incidence of SVT after abdominal surgery and identified groups at highest risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase were searched for clinical studies evaluating the incidence of postoperative SVT after abdominopelvic surgery. Study selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment were carried out independently by two reviewers. Clinical heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analyses (i.e., type of intra-abdominal procedure and organ group).

RESULTS

Of 5549 abstracts screened, 48 were analyzed. Pooled incidence of SVT (n = 50,267) was 2.68% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.24 to 3.11] (1347 events), I² = 96%. Pooled incidence of SVT in high-risk procedures were splenectomy with devascularization (24%), hepatectomy in patients with cirrhosis (9%), and pancreatectomy with venous resection (5%). Pooled incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SVT was 1.02% (95% CI: 0.97% to 1.07%) and 0.98% (95% CI 0.88% to 1.07%), respectively. Most common causes of SVT-related mortality were irreversible thrombosis, bowel ischemia, liver failure, and gastrointestinal bleed. Most studies included were at a high risk of bias due to lack of prospective data collection and lack of SVT screening for all participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of SVT after abdominal surgery is low but remains a relevant complication. Patients undergoing procedures involving surgical manipulation of the venous system and splenectomy are at the highest risk. Given the life-threatening risks associated with SVT, there is a need for larger prospective studies on the incidence and impact of SVT after abdominal surgery.

Intestinal failure after bariatric surgery: Treatment and outcome at a single-intestinal rehabilitation and transplant center

BACKGROUND

Though intestinal failure (IF) after bariatric surgery (BS) is uncommon, its prevalence is increasing. However, data on the outcomes for these patients are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the outcomes of treatment for patients with IF after BS.

SETTING

University hospital.

METHODS

A single-center analysis (1991-2016) of outcomes according to treatment arms established by a multidisciplinary team.

RESULTS

Twenty-five IF patients were identified (median age 45 yr). BS was 92% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The major cause of IF was volvulus/internal hernia (72%). Median time from BS to IF was 48 months. Treatment arms were intestinal rehabilitation (IR, n = 15), transplantation (TXP, n = 5), and parenteral nutrition (PN, n = 5). For IR, median bowel length was 60 cm. Forty-six percent ultimately discontinued PN. Twenty-seven percent were partially weaned PN and 27% failed IR. Common surgical rehabilitation was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reversal and restoration of gastrointestinal continuity. The 5-year overall survival was 74%. For TXP, 7 patients were listed for TXP (5 initially and 2 after failed IR). Three underwent TXP, 2 isolated intestine and 1 isolated liver. Three were delisted (1 improvement and 2 death). For PN, 6 patients required long-term PN (5 initially and 1 after failed IR). Four patients are alive currently.

CONCLUSIONS

IF after BS is an increasing problem facing IR centers. Internal hernia is the major cause. Surgical IR is the first-line therapy and affords the best outcome. TXP is reserved for rescuing patients who failed IR or develop PN complications. Long-term PN is suitable for patients in whom IR or TXP is impractical.

Gallbladder varices in a pediatric patient after roux-en-Y gastric bypass

This is a case with associated radiologic images for a pediatric patient who developed portomesenteric and splenic vein thrombosis (PMSVT) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with subsequent development of portal cavernoma and gallbladder varices (GBV). This case highlights both the importance of post-operative prophylactic anti-coagulation after gastric bypass and detailed imaging following a diagnosis of PMSVT. This case is relevant for pediatric surgeons as they are performing this operation more frequently with the increase in pediatric obesity.

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis following laparoscopic greater curve plication for morbid obesity

Portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) is an uncommon condition associated with intra-abdominal visceral ischemia that is often difficult to manage. While postoperative PMVT has been rarely reported following laparoscopic abdominal surgery, its occurrence in morbidly obese patients is gaining increasing concern due to its relatively higher incidence after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Diagnosis of PMVT can be readily accomplished by computed tomography scan. Although prompt treatment with recanalisation of portovenous system and reversal of mesenteric venous ischemia can be potentially life-saving, the overall mortality of postoperative PMVT can only be controlled by understanding the underlying etiologies and preventing its occurrence. Here, we report a case of PMVT in a morbidly obese lady who presented at 10days after an uneventful laparoscopic greater curve plication. The potential etiology and management of this rare complication are elucidated in details.

Extensive Thrombus and Brain Microabscesses After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Sleeve gastrectomy is a relatively newer bariatric surgical procedure and has become the most common of all bariatric surgeries performed. Complication rates reported with sleeve gastrectomies are relatively low and are generally due to staple line leaks, hemorrhage, or sleeve stricture. Portal vein thrombosis is an uncommon but potentially dangerous complication. We present a case of a 21-year-old woman who developed thrombosis of the portal, splenic, and right common iliac veins that then resulted in multifocal brain abscesses from presumed Fusobacterium septic emboli following an uncomplicated laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: diagnosis, natural history, and therapeutic challenges

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent complication in cirrhosis and its prevalence increases with disease severity. Several factors are involved in the development and progression of PVT. The challenge for the management of PVT is the precise evaluation of the bleeding risk as opposed to life-threatening extension of thrombosis. Nevertheless, the impact on the progression and outcome of liver disease is unclear. A critical evaluation of the available data discloses that treating PVT in cirrhotics is safe and effective. However, there are open issues, such as which anticoagulant could represent a safer therapeutic option, and when and for how long this treatment should be administered to cirrhotic patients with PVT.

Thrombosis of the spleno-mesentiric portal axis following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A rare case report

INTRODUCTION

Mesenteric, splenic and portal veins thrombosis (MSPVT) is uncommon complication after sleeve gastrectomy.

CASE REPORT

A 38-year-old female underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for the treatment of morbid obesity, presented 4weeks later with epigastric pain. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed superior mesenteric, splenic and the portal veins thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

MSPVT is a rare presentation after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, which requires early diagnosis and management and it should be included in the differential diagnosis for unexplained abdominal symptoms after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Report of Mesocaval Shunt in the Management of Variceal Hemorrhage Following Gastric Bypass Surgery

Gastrointestinal bleeding following Roux-en- Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is rare. We report an unusual cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding following RYGB that was complicated by porto- splenic vein thrombosis. A 35- year- old woman was successfully treated by mesocaval surgical shunt for recurrent variceal hemorrhage in the excluded stomach following RYGB.

Factor VIII elevation may contribute to portomesenteric vein thrombosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter review of 40 patients

BACKGROUND

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) has been increasingly reported after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Factor VIII (FVIII) is a plasma sialoglycoprotein that plays an essential role in hemostasis. There is increasing evidence that FVIII elevation constitutes a clinically important risk factor for venous thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES

To report the prevalence of FVIII elevation as well as other clinical characteristics in a multicenter series of patients who developed PMVT after LSG.

SETTING

University hospitals.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients that developed PMVT after laparoscopic bariatric surgery from 2006 to 2016 at 6 high-volume bariatric surgery centers.

RESULTS

Forty patients who developed PMVT postoperatively, all after LSG, were identified. During this timeframe, 25,569 laparoscopic bariatric surgery cases were performed, including 9749 LSG (PMVT incidence after LSG = .4%). Mean age and body mass index were 40 years (18-65) and 43.4 kg/m² (35-59.7), respectively. Abdominal pain was the most common (98%) presenting symptom. Of patients, 92% had a hematologic abnormality identified, and of these, FVIII elevation was the most common (76%). The vast majority (90%) was successfully managed with therapeutic anticoagulation alone. A smaller number of patients required small bowel resection (n = 2) and surgical thrombectomy (n = 1). There were no mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

A high index of clinical suspicion and prompt diagnosis/treatment of PMVT usually leads to favorable outcomes. FVIII elevation was the most common (76%) hematologic abnormality identified in this patient cohort. Further studies are needed to determine the prevalence of FVIII elevation in patients seeking bariatric surgery.

Is Portomesenteric Vein Thrombosis After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Related to Short-Course Prophylaxis of Thromboembolism? A Monocentric Retrospective Analysis About an Infrequent but Not Rare Complication and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) is considered a rare and potentially fatal complication of bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most performed bariatric procedures in the world. PMVT in LSG was first reported in 2009 by Berthet et al. in a thrombophilic patient. No data exist regarding the real prevalence of this complication specifically after LSG.

METHODS

We examined retrospectively all the clinical records of patients who underwent LSG for morbid obesity from January 2011 to December 2016. Moreover, we performed a literature search of PubMed, Medscape, and EMBASE databases, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

2854 patients underwent LSG for morbid obesity from January 2011 to December 2016. The retrospective analysis of our records revealed only 1 case of PMVT. The 18 studies selected include 62 cases of PMVT after LSG with a prevalence of 0.52% (ranging from 0.2% to 1.81%) and a mortality rate of 1.61%.

CONCLUSIONS

PMVT is an infrequent but not rare complication in patients who undergo LSG. Short-course antithrombotic prophylaxis (<10 days) could increase the risk of this complication. The authors recommend a postoperative prophylaxis with sodium enoxaparin 40 mg sc once a day for 4 weeks. PMVT mortality in patients who undergo LSG is lower than other causes of portal vein thrombosis (hepatic cirrhosis, tumors, myeloproliferative disorders, etc.) If risk factors for PMVT are present preoperatively, the authors recommend a prophylaxis with sodium enoxaparin 40 mg sc twice daily for 4 weeks.

A systematic review of portomesenteric vein thrombosis after sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) is considered an uncommon complication in general surgery; nevertheless, with the growing popularity of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as a bariatric procedure we have seen an increase in the occurrence of this complication.

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate the question if it is a procedure-related complication and explore the modalities of prevention and treatment of this complication, a systematic review of available literature regarding PMVT events after SG was conducted.

METHODS

Our systematic review yielded 28 studies enclosing 89 patients. Perioperative data was collected from each study and analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of PMVT after SG ranged from .37% to 1%, 65% of the patients were female, and the mean body mass index was 41.63 kg/m². Perioperative co-morbidities including hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia were recorded in 39.7%, 41.63%, and 38.23% of cases respectively. Tachycardia and fever were reported only in 23.9% and 20.89%, respectively, and hereditary thrombophilia studies were positive in 30.43% of cases. The rate of acute major complications after PMVT was 14.6% (13 cases), and mortality was reported in 3 cases (average 3.37%).

CONCLUSION

PMVT seems to be an uncommon multifactorial disease, with unpredictable symptoms and varieties of the treatments options, but additional studies are required to further define optimal management and prevention algorithms.

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) is a rare, life-threatening pathology associated with increased prevalence in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) versus other gastric bypass procedures. Gaining popularity, LSG is becoming the first choice of patients and physicians alike due to its low complication profile compared to the gastric bypass procedure. We present the case of a 34-year-old woman who underwent an uncomplicated LSG for the treatment of morbid obesity, and presented on postoperative day 13 with PMVT. The patient underwent mechanical thrombectomy and thrombolytic therapy. After 2 days, patency was restored and the patient was discharged in stable condition. A high index of suspicion for PMVT should be considered in patients reporting diffuse abdominal pain after LSG. Owing to its lethality, upon confirmation of PMVT, therapy should begin immediately along with extended anticoagulation therapy on discharge.