1
|
Ortega PM, Scholtz S, O'Donnell K, Hakky S, Purkayastha S, Tsironis C, Moorthy K, Aggarwal R, Ahmed AR. Risk Factors for Chronic Abdominal Pain After RYGB: Are Patients Adequately Selected Beforehand? Obes Surg 2024; 34:1748-1755. [PMID: 38575742 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07193-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chronic abdominal pain after RYGB is a known issue. Identifying the potential patient-related and modifiable risk factors might contribute to diminish the risk for this undesirable outcome. METHODS A single-center retrospective cohort study with prospective data collection was conducted with inclusion of all patients who underwent RYGB surgery between 2015 and 2021. Data from the NBSR and medical records were used. Patients with chronic abdominal pain were defined when pain lasting or recurring for more than 3 to 6 months. RESULTS Six hundred sixty-four patients who underwent RYGB surgery were included with a median follow-up of 60.5 months. Forty-nine patients (7.3%) presented with chronic abdominal pain. Postoperative complications (OR 13.376, p = 0.020) and diagnosis of depression (OR 1.971, p = 0.037) were associated with developing abdominal pain. On the other hand, ex-smokers (OR 0.222, p = 0.040) and older age (0.959, p = 0.004) presented as protective factors. CONCLUSION Postoperative complications and diagnosis of depression are risk factors for chronic pain after RYGB. The role of the bariatric MDT remains crucial to select these patients adequately beforehand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia M Ortega
- Imperial Weight Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK.
| | - Samantha Scholtz
- Imperial Weight Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK
- West London NHS Trust, Southall, UK
| | - Karen O'Donnell
- Imperial Weight Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Sherif Hakky
- Imperial Weight Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Sanjay Purkayastha
- Imperial Weight Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Christos Tsironis
- Imperial Weight Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Krishna Moorthy
- Imperial Weight Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Ravi Aggarwal
- Imperial Weight Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Ahmed R Ahmed
- Imperial Weight Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, London, W2 1NY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hedberg S, Thorell A, Österberg J, Peltonen M, Andersson E, Näslund E, Hertel JK, Svanevik M, Stenberg E, Neovius M, Näslund I, Wirén M, Ottosson J, Olbers T. Comparison of Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2353141. [PMID: 38289603 PMCID: PMC10828911 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are widely used bariatric procedures for which comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear. Objective To compare perioperative outcomes in SG and RYGB. Design, Setting, and Participants In this registry-based, multicenter randomized clinical trial (Bypass Equipoise Sleeve Trial), baseline and perioperative data for patients undergoing bariatric surgery from October 6, 2015, to March 31, 2022, were analyzed. Patients were from university, regional, county, and private hospitals in Sweden (n = 20) and Norway (n = 3). Adults (aged ≥18 years) eligible for bariatric surgery with body mass indexes (BMIs; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 35 to 50 were studied. Interventions Laparoscopic SG or RYGB. Main Outcomes and Measures Perioperative complications were analyzed as all adverse events and serious adverse events (Clavien-Dindo grade >IIIb). Ninety-day mortality was also assessed. Results A total of 1735 of 14 182 eligible patients (12%; 1282 [73.9%] female; mean (SD) age, 42.9 [11.1] years; mean [SD] BMI, 40.8 [3.7]) were included in the study. Patients were randomized and underwent SG (n = 878) or RYGB (n = 857). The mean (SD) operating time was shorter in those undergoing SG vs RYGB (47 [18] vs 68 [25] minutes; P < .001). The median (IQR) postoperative hospital stay was 1 (1-1) day in both groups. The 30-day readmission rate was 3.1% after SG and 4.0% after RYGB (P = .33). There was no 90-day mortality. The 30-day incidence of any adverse event was 40 (4.6%) and 54 (6.3%) in the SG and RYGB groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47-1.08; P = .11). Corresponding figures for serious adverse events were 15 (1.7%) for the SG group and 23 (2.7%) for the RYGB group (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.33-1.22; P = .19). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial of 1735 patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery found that both SG and RYGB were performed with a low perioperative risk without clinically significant differences between groups. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02767505.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Hedberg
- Department of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery (Östra Sjukhuset), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anders Thorell
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johanna Österberg
- Department of Surgery, Mora Hospital, Mora, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Ellen Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Vrinnevi Hospital, Norrköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Erik Näslund
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jens Kristoffer Hertel
- Department of Endocrinology, Obesity, and Nutrition, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Marius Svanevik
- Department of Endocrinology, Obesity, and Nutrition, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
- Department of Surgery, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Erik Stenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Martin Neovius
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Näslund
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Mikael Wirén
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Ottosson
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Torsten Olbers
- Department of Surgery, Vrinnevi Hospital, Norrköping, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rogers AM. Comment on: The burden of abdominal pain after bariatric surgery in terms of diagnostic testing: the OPERATE study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2024; 20:38-39. [PMID: 37805295 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Rogers
- Penn State Surgical Weight Loss Program, Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ghazi R, Razzak FA, Kerbage A, Brunaldi V, Storm AC, Vargas EJ, Bofill-Garcia A, Chandrasekhara V, Law RJ, Martin JA, Ghanem OM, Petersen BT, Abu Dayyeh BK. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) approach for patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study between four ERCP techniques with proposed management algorithm. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2024; 20:53-61. [PMID: 37690929 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is technically challenging in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to altered anatomy. OBJECTIVE To compare the procedural and clinical outcomes of 4 different ERCP techniques in RYGB patients. SETTING Academic tertiary referral center in the United States. METHODS A retrospective cohort study including patients with RYGB anatomy who underwent an ERCP between January 2015 and September 2020. We compared procedural success and adverse events (AEs) rates of balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE), gastrostomy-assisted ERCP (GAE), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE), and rendezvous guidewire-assisted ERCP (RGA). RESULTS Seventy-eight RYGB patients underwent a total of 132 ERCPs. The mean age was 60 ± 11.8 years, with female predominance (85.7%). The ERCP procedures performed were BAE (n = 64; 48.5%), GAE (n = 18; 13.7%), EDGE (n = 25; 18.9%), and RGA (n = 25; 18.9%), with overall procedure success rates of 64.1%, 100%, 89.5%, and 91.7%, respectively. All approaches were superior to BAE (GAE versus BAE, P = .003; EDGE versus BAE, P = .034; RGA versus BAE, P = .011). The overall AE rates were 10.9%, 11.1%, 15.8 %, and 25.0%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in AEs. There were also no differences in bleeding, post-ERCP pancreatitis, and perforation rates between the 4 approaches. CONCLUSION Procedure success was similar between GAE, RGA, and EDGE, but superior to BAE. AE rates were similar between approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabih Ghazi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Internal Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey
| | - Farah Abdul Razzak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Anthony Kerbage
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Vitor Brunaldi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Andrew C Storm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Eric J Vargas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Ryan J Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John A Martin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Omar M Ghanem
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bret T Petersen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Barham K Abu Dayyeh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Olst N, Vink MRA, de Vet SCP, Hutten BA, Gerdes VEA, Tielbeek JAW, Bruin SC, van Weyenberg SJB, van der Peet DL, Acherman YIZ. A Prospective Study on the Diagnoses for Abdominal Pain After Bariatric Surgery: The OPERATE Study. Obes Surg 2023; 33:3017-3027. [PMID: 37563516 PMCID: PMC10514148 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06756-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery (BS) reveals high numbers of patients with abdominal pain that often remains unexplained. The aim of this prospective study was to give an overview of diagnoses for abdominal pain, percentage of unexplained complaints, number and yield of follow-up visits, and time to establish a diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who visited the Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, The Netherlands, between December 2020 and December 2021 for abdominal pain after BS, were eligible and followed throughout the entire episode of abdominal pain. Distinction was made between presumed and definitive diagnoses. RESULTS The study comprised 441 patients with abdominal pain; 401 (90.9%) females, 380 (87.7%) had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, mean (SD) % total weight loss was 31.4 (10.5), and median (IQR) time after BS was 37.0 (11.0-66.0) months. Most patients had 1-5 follow-up visits. Readmissions and reoperations were present in 212 (48.1%) and 164 (37.2%) patients. At the end of the episode, 88 (20.0%) patients had a presumed diagnosis, 183 (41.5%) a definitive diagnosis, and 170 (38.5%) unexplained complaints. Most common definitive diagnoses were cholelithiasis, ulcers, internal herniations, and presumed diagnoses irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome, and constipation. Median (IQR) time to presumed diagnoses, definitive diagnoses, or unexplained complaints was 16.0 (3.8-44.5), 2.0 (0.0-31.5), and 13.5 (1.0-53.8) days (p < 0.001). Patients with IBS more often had unexplained complaints (OR 95%CI: 4.457 [1.455-13.654], p = 0.009). At the end, 71 patients (16.1%) still experienced abdominal pain. CONCLUSION Over a third of abdominal complaints after BS remains unexplained. Most common diagnoses were cholelithiasis, ulcers, and internal herniations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke van Olst
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marjolein R A Vink
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Sterre C P de Vet
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara A Hutten
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Diabetes & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Victor E A Gerdes
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
- Department of Vascular Medicine Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen A W Tielbeek
- Department of Radiology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd C Bruin
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn J B van Weyenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yair I Z Acherman
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Importance Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains one of the most commonly performed operations for morbid obesity and is associated with significant long-term weight loss and comorbidity remission. However, health care utilization rates following RYGB are high and abdominal pain is reported as the most common presenting symptom for those seeking care. Observations Given the limitations of physical examination in patients with obesity, correct diagnosis of abdominal pain following RYGB depends on a careful history and appropriate use of radiologic, laboratory and endoscopic studies, as well as a clear understanding of post-RYGB anatomy. The most common etiologies of abdominal pain after RYGB are internal hernia, marginal ulcer, biliary disease (eg, cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis), and jejunojejunal anastomotic issues. Early identification of the etiology of the pain is essential, as some causes, such as internal hernia or perforated gastrojejunal ulcer, may require urgent or emergent intervention to avoid significant morbidity. While laboratory findings and imaging may prove useful, they remain imperfect, and clinical judgment should always be used to determine if surgical exploration is warranted. Conclusions and Relevance The etiologies of abdominal pain after RYGB range from the relatively benign to potentially life-threatening. This Review highlights the importance of understanding key anatomical and technical aspects of RYGB to guide appropriate workup, diagnosis, and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian T Fry
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Blom-Høgestøl IK, Aasbrenn M, Kvalem IL, Eribe I, Kristinsson JA, Mala T. Pain sensitivity after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass - associations with chronic abdominal pain and psychosocial aspects. Scand J Pain 2023; 23:511-517. [PMID: 37306001 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2023-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to investigate modifications in pain sensitivity after RYGB and to explore associations between pain sensitivity and weight loss, chronic abdominal pain, total body pain, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing. METHODS In total, 163 patients with obesity were examined with a cold pressor test for pain sensitivity before and two years after RYGB. Two aspects of pain sensitivity were registered: Pain intensity (numeric rating scale, range 0-10) and pain tolerance (seconds). Associations between pain sensitivity and the explanatory variables were assessed with linear regression. RESULTS Two years after RYGB the pain intensity increased (mean ± SD 0.64 ± 1.9 score units, p<0.001). Pain tolerance decreased (7.2 ± 32.4 s, p=0.005). A larger reduction in body mass index was associated with increased pain intensity, β=-0.090 (95 % CI -0.15 to -0.031, p=0.003), and decreased pain tolerance β=1.1 (95 % CI 0.95 to 2.2, p=0.03). Before surgery, participants with chronic abdominal pain reported 1.2 ± 0.5 higher pain intensity (p=0.02) and had 19.2 ± 9.3 s lower pain tolerance (p=0.04) than those without abdominal pain. No differences in pain sensitivity were observed between participants who did or did not develop chronic abdominal pain after RYGB. Pain sensitivity was associated with symptoms of anxiety but not with pain catastrophizing, depression or bodily pain. CONCLUSIONS The pain sensitivity increased after RYGB and was associated with larger weight loss and anxiety symptoms. Changes in pain sensitivity were not associated with development of chronic abdominal pain after RYGB in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingvild K Blom-Høgestøl
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Martin Aasbrenn
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Inger Eribe
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jon A Kristinsson
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Paediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tom Mala
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Paediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stenberg E, Ottosson J, Magnuson A, Szabo E, Wallén S, Näslund E, Thorell A, Näslund I. Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Closure of Mesenteric Defects in Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:709-717. [PMID: 37163240 PMCID: PMC10173104 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance Short-term and midterm data suggest that mesenteric defects closure during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery reduces the risk of internal herniation with small bowel obstruction (SBO) but may increase risk of kinking of the jejunojejunostomy in the early postoperative period. However, to our knowledge, there are no clinical trials reporting long-term results from this intervention in terms of risk for SBO or opioid use. Objective To evaluate long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of closure of mesenteric defects during LRYGB. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial with a 2-arm, parallel, open-label design included patients with severe obesity scheduled for LRYGB bariatric surgery at 12 centers in Sweden from May 1, 2010, through November 14, 2011, with 10 years of follow-up after the intervention. Interventions During the operation, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to closure of mesenteric defects beneath the jejunojejunostomy and at the Petersen space using nonabsorbable running sutures during LRYGB or to nonclosure. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome was reoperation for SBO. New incident, chronic opioid use was a secondary end point as a measure of harm. Results A total of 2507 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.7 [10.7] years; 1863 female [74.3%]) were randomly assigned to closure of mesenteric defects (n = 1259) or nonclosure (n = 1248). After censoring for death and emigration, 1193 patients in the closure group (94.8%) and 1198 in the nonclosure group (96.0%) were followed up until the study closed. Over a median follow-up of 10 years (IQR, 10.0-10.0 years), a reoperation for SBO from day 31 to 10 years after surgery was performed in 185 patients with nonclosure (10-year cumulative incidence, 14.9%; 95% CI, 13.0%-16.9%) and in 98 patients with closure (10-year cumulative incidence, 7.8%; 95% CI, 6.4%-9.4%) (subhazard ratio [SHR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.32-0.55). New incident chronic opioid use was seen among 175 of 863 opioid-naive patients with nonclosure (10-year cumulative incidence, 20.4%; 95% CI, 17.7%-23.0%) and 166 of 895 opioid-naive patients with closure (10-year cumulative incidence, 18.7%; 95% CI, 16.2%-21.3%) (SHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.11). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found long-term reduced risk of SBO after mesenteric defects closure in LRYGB. The findings suggest that routine use of this procedure during LRYGB should be considered. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01137201.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Stenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Johan Ottosson
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Anders Magnuson
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Eva Szabo
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Stefan Wallén
- Pharmacology and Therapeutic Department, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Erik Näslund
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Thorell
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Näslund
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Torensma B, Hany M, Bakker MJS, van Velzen M, in ’t Veld BA, Dahan A, Swank DJ. Cross-sectional E-survey on the Incidence of Pre- and Postoperative Chronic Pain in Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2023; 33:204-210. [PMID: 36344727 PMCID: PMC9834162 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06354-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the prevalence, incidence, location, and behavior of chronic pre- and postoperative pain in bariatric surgery, and the use of analgesics. METHODS A cross-sectional e-survey was conducted on 3928 post-bariatric patients and four-time points for pain assessment were evaluated: preoperative, on the ward, day 1 at home postoperatively, and present time (at the time of the e-survey). A numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to assess the level of pain (0 to 10). The general incidence of chronic pain was calculated, as also, subgroups were defined as group A (pre and postoperative chronic pain), B (preoperative pain, and no longer postoperative), and C (preoperative painless, postoperative chronic pain). Besides the pain intensity, location of pain, and the use of analgesics were investigated. RESULTS A total of 3279 patients (83.9%) responded to the survey. Preoperative and postoperative chronic pain was found in 343 (10.5%) and 264 (8.1%) patients, respectively. In group A, chronic pain was present in 4.8% of the patients; in group B, it was present in 5.7%; and in group C in 3.3% of the patients. Furthermore, in 4.5% of patients pain was located in the abdomen, which was higher as compared to before surgery (+ 2.3%, p < 0.001). The ORs for present postoperative chronic pain were OR 1.45, 1.7, and 1.71 (p = 0.002, 0.003, 0.003) compared to respectively preoperative chronic pain, pain at the ward, and pain at day 1 after surgery. Among all participants, 4.6% consumed chronic analgesics. Of these, paracetamol was used most frequently (3.8%), followed by tramadol (1.3%) and oxycodone (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS In this e-survey, chronic postoperative abdominal pain was prominent in patients after bariatric surgery. Of patients, 3.3% that were without preoperative chronic pain developed chronic pain after surgery. Opioid consumption in the queried population was relatively low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Torensma
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands ,Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Mohammed Hany
- Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Marije J. S. Bakker
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monique van Velzen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Albert Dahan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vogelaerts R, Van Pachtenbeke L, Raudsepp M, Morlion B. Chronic abdominal pain after bariatric surgery: a narrative review. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA BELGICA 2022. [DOI: 10.56126/73.4.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective: This paper reviews the prevalence, etiology, risk factors, diagnosis and prevention of chronic abdominal pain after bariatric surgery.
Introduction: Chronic pain is a very common and complex problem that has serious consequences on individuals and society. It frequently presents as a result of a disease or an injury. Obesity and obesity-related comorbidities are a major health problem and are dramatically increasing year after year. Dieting and physical exercise show disappointing results in the treatment of obesity. Therefore, bariatric surgery is increasingly widely offered as a weight reducing strategy. In our pain clinic we see a lot of patients who suffer from chronic abdominal pain after bariatric surgery. This review aims to explore the link between chronic abdominal pain and bariatric surgery in this specific type of patients.
Method: The review is based on searches in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Keywords are used in different combinations. We did a cross-reference of the articles included.
Results: Chronic abdominal pain after bariatric surgery is very common. Around 30% of the bariatric patients experience persistent abdominal pain. An explanation for the abdominal pain is found in 2/3 of these patients.
There is a wide variety of causes including behavioral and nutritional disorders, functional motility disorders, biliary disorders, marginal ulceration and internal hernia. Another, frequently overlooked, cause is abdominal wall pain. Unexplained abdominal pain after bariatric surgery is present in 1/3 of the patients with persistent abdominal pain. More studies are needed on the risk factors and prevention of unexplained abdominal pain in bariatric patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Clapp B, Wicker E, Vivar A, Kara AM, Gamez J, Davis B. Long Term Outcomes after Laparoscopic Assisted Trans-Gastric Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. JSLS 2021; 25:JSLS.2021.00048. [PMID: 34552319 PMCID: PMC8443239 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2021.00048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The gastric bypass is a commonly performed bariatric procedure. The stomach is divided into a small pouch as well as leaving a larger remnant that is bypassed by the gastrojejunal anastomosis. This makes access to the biliary system difficult as an endoscope cannot transverse the esophagus, roux limb, and biliopancreatic limb. Therefore, a transgastric approach (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [t-ERCP]) through the abdominal wall and remnant stomach is necessary. This involves the surgical team providing access to the remnant stomach for the gastroenterologist to perform the t-ERCP. We have performed a number of these for biliary pathology that ranges from cancer to retained gallstones. We evaluated these patients with at least a 3-year follow-up to determine long term outcomes. Methods: We conducted a chart review of patients who underwent a t-ERCP with at least a 3-year follow-up. We collected de-identified data including demographics, operative details, complications, and postoperative courses. Results: There were 12 patients who underwent t-ERCP. Eleven patients had at least a 3-year follow-up with a mean follow-up of 68.1 months (excluding one death from pancreatic cancer). The most common pathology was benign biliary stricture (n = 6), followed by retained gallstones (n = 4), with one pancreatic cancer, and one normal examination. Two patients still had epigastric pain at long term follow-up after 3 years. Conclusion: T-ERCP is safe and efficacious with good long-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Clapp
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX
| | - Ellen Wicker
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX
| | - Andres Vivar
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX
| | - Ali M Kara
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX
| | - Jesus Gamez
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX
| | - Brian Davis
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li JV, Ashrafian H, Sarafian M, Homola D, Rushton L, Barker G, Cabrera PM, Lewis MR, Darzi A, Lin E, Gletsu-Miller NA, Atkin SL, Sathyapalan T, Gooderham NJ, Nicholson JK, Marchesi JR, Athanasiou T, Holmes E. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-induced bacterial perturbation contributes to altered host-bacterial co-metabolic phenotype. MICROBIOME 2021; 9:139. [PMID: 34127058 PMCID: PMC8201742 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-021-01086-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery, used to achieve effective weight loss in individuals with severe obesity, modifies the gut microbiota and systemic metabolism in both humans and animal models. The aim of the current study was to understand better the metabolic functions of the altered gut microbiome by conducting deep phenotyping of bariatric surgery patients and bacterial culturing to investigate causality of the metabolic observations. METHODS Three bariatric cohorts (n = 84, n = 14 and n = 9) with patients who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or laparoscopic gastric banding (LGB), respectively, were enrolled. Metabolic and 16S rRNA bacterial profiles were compared between pre- and post-surgery. Faeces from RYGB patients and bacterial isolates were cultured to experimentally associate the observed metabolic changes in biofluids with the altered gut microbiome. RESULTS Compared to SG and LGB, RYGB induced the greatest weight loss and most profound metabolic and bacterial changes. RYGB patients showed increased aromatic amino acids-based host-bacterial co-metabolism, resulting in increased urinary excretion of 4-hydroxyphenylacetate, phenylacetylglutamine, 4-cresyl sulphate and indoxyl sulphate, and increased faecal excretion of tyramine and phenylacetate. Bacterial degradation of choline was increased as evidenced by altered urinary trimethylamine-N-oxide and dimethylamine excretion and faecal concentrations of dimethylamine. RYGB patients' bacteria had a greater capacity to produce tyramine from tyrosine, phenylalanine to phenylacetate and tryptophan to indole and tryptamine, compared to the microbiota from non-surgery, normal weight individuals. 3-Hydroxydicarboxylic acid metabolism and urinary excretion of primary bile acids, serum BCAAs and dimethyl sulfone were also perturbed following bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION Altered bacterial composition and metabolism contribute to metabolic observations in biofluids of patients following RYGB surgery. The impact of these changes on the functional clinical outcomes requires further investigation. Video abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia V Li
- Division of Digestive Disease, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Magali Sarafian
- Division of Digestive Disease, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Daniel Homola
- Division of Digestive Disease, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Laura Rushton
- Division of Digestive Disease, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
- Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Grace Barker
- Division of Digestive Disease, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Paula Momo Cabrera
- Division of Digestive Disease, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Matthew R Lewis
- Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Edward Lin
- Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| | - Nana Adwoa Gletsu-Miller
- Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, 1025 E 7th Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA
| | | | - Thozhukat Sathyapalan
- Department of Academic Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Hull-York Medical School, Hull, UK
| | - Nigel J Gooderham
- Division of Digestive Disease, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Jeremy K Nicholson
- Centre for Computational and Systems Medicine, The Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Harry Perkins Building, Perth, WA, 6150, Australia
| | - Julian R Marchesi
- Division of Digestive Disease, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Thanos Athanasiou
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Elaine Holmes
- Division of Digestive Disease, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
- Centre for Computational and Systems Medicine, The Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Harry Perkins Building, Perth, WA, 6150, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Westerink F, Huibregtse I, De Hoog M, Bruin S, Meesters E, Brandjes D, Gerdes V. Faecal Inflammatory Biomarkers and Gastrointestinal Symptoms after Bariatric Surgery: A Longitudinal Study. Inflamm Intest Dis 2021; 6:109-116. [PMID: 34124182 DOI: 10.1159/000514576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bariatric surgery induces various gastrointestinal (GI) modifications. We performed the first study longitudinally assessing the effect of bariatric surgery on faecal inflammatory biomarker levels and its relation with GI complaints. Method Faecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, and calgranulin-C levels were determined in 41 patients (34 Roux-en-Y [RYGB], 7 sleeves) before and at 6-16 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Changes in biomarker levels and percentage of patients above reference value were determined. Gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) was used to assess GI complaints at corresponding time points. The postoperative relation between GSRS score and biomarker levels above reference value was investigated. Results After RYGB, median calprotectin levels are significantly higher (>188, 104-415 μg/g) than before surgery (40, 19-78 μg/g; p < 0.001), and over 90% of patients have levels above reference value 1 year after surgery. Median lactoferrin was 0.4 (0.2-1.6) μg/g before, and >5.9 (1.8-13.6) μg/g after surgery (p < 0.001). Median calgranulin-C levels remained far below the reference value and were 0.13 (0.05-0.24) μg/g before and <0.23 (0.06-0.33) μg/g after surgery. Similar results were found after sleeve gastrectomy. No difference was seen in GSRS score for patients with calprotectin and lactoferrin levels above reference values. Conclusion Faecal inflammatory biomarkers calprotectin and lactoferrin, but not calgranulin-C, rise above reference values shortly after bariatric surgery and remain elevated in the majority of patients. The discrepancy between calprotectin and calgranulin-C levels suggests no GI inflammation. Furthermore, patients after RYGB with biomarkers above the population reference value do not seem to have more GI complaints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris Westerink
- Department of internal medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Huibregtse
- Department of gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sjoerd Bruin
- Department of surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Eelco Meesters
- Department of internal medicine, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Desiderius Brandjes
- Department of internal medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Victor Gerdes
- Department of internal medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of internal medicine, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mou D, DeVries CEE, Pater N, Poulsen L, Makarawung DJS, Wiezer MJ, van Veen RN, Hoogbergen MM, Sorensen JA, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Tavakkoli A. BODY-Q patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM) to assess sleeve gastrectomy vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: eating behavior, eating-related distress, and eating-related symptoms. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:4609-4617. [PMID: 32815020 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07886-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-operative changes in eating behavior, eating-related distress and eating-related symptoms play an important role in the lives of bariatric surgery patients. However, there are no studies that assess these outcomes using a specifically designed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. We use our newly developed and validated scales as part of the well-established BODY-Q PROMs to compare laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients (LRYGB). METHODS We analyzed data from an international multi-center prospective cohort study of patients over 18 who underwent bariatric surgery. We used multivariable linear regression models to assess the difference between LRYGB and LSG for the new BODY-Q scales, which include eating behavior, eating-related distress and eating-related symptoms. All analyses were corrected for significant confounding variables. RESULTS Out of 1420 patients, 920 underwent LRYGB and 500 underwent LSG. The LRYGB group had a higher percentage total weight loss (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in eating behavior (e.g., stop eating before feeling full, avoiding unhealthy snacks, etc.) or eating-related distress (e.g., feeling ashamed or out of control after eating). Patients who underwent LSG scored significantly better on the post-prandial eating-related symptoms scale (e.g., vomiting, reflux; p < 0.001). Symptoms more prevalent in the LRYGB patients were related to dumping syndrome whereas symptoms more prevalent in LSG patients were related to reflux. CONCLUSION Patients who underwent LRYGB had a significantly better weight loss after surgery, but they scored worse on post-prandial symptoms in comparison to LSG patients. This information may be relevant for patients in the pre-operative counseling setting, as it may influence their decision for surgical procedure selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danny Mou
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francs St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Claire E E DeVries
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francs St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Nena Pater
- Maastricht University Medical School, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Poulsen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jens A Sorensen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne F Klassen
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francs St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Ali Tavakkoli
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francs St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Layton GR, Bhanderi S, Sahloul M, Charalampakis V, Daskalakis M, Singhal R. Challenges and outcomes for bariatric surgery in patients with paraplegia: Case series and systematic review. Clin Obes 2020; 10:e12382. [PMID: 32506828 DOI: 10.1111/cob.12382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Revised: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Obesity contributes to a plethora of significant chronic diseases. Bariatric surgery has been demonstrated to be the most cost-effective treatment for severe obesity and significantly reduces morbidity and mortality from metabolic syndrome. Patients with paraplegia have significantly impaired mobility and are therefore at a much higher risk of developing severe obesity and its sequelae. Bariatric surgery may bring significant improvements to mobility, morbidity and quality of life for patients with paraplegia, but evidence in the literature is poor for this group of patients. METHODS A systematic review was conducted conforming to PRISMA guidelines. The MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched for all articles published prior to April 2019 matching all of the keywords 'bariatric', 'paraplegia' and 'spinal cord'. Articles were assessed for relevance and full texts reviewed. In addition, clinical records were reviewed for three patients who underwent bariatric surgery at a single UK private institution. Non-identifiable demographic, clinical, operative and outcome data were obtained from electronic records. RESULTS Twenty seven articles were retrieved from the initial database search, of which nine eligible full texts were reviewed. Eight articles were case reports or case series and the final article was a systematic review. All cases reported had positive outcomes with significant weight loss, improvement in mobility and increased quality of life. Outcomes from the three diversely aged patients in our case series were similarly positive, with no significant post-operative complications. DISCUSSION Patients with obesity and paraplegia may significantly benefit from bariatric surgery. There is a need for multi-centre cohort studies to evaluate outcomes and the choice of bariatric intervention. UK guidelines do not include criteria based on mobility or neurological deficit, resulting in a potential missed opportunity to offer a cost-effective treatment that can significantly improve quality of life for patients with severe obesity and paraplegia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia R Layton
- Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Shivam Bhanderi
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mohamed Sahloul
- Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Vasileios Charalampakis
- Warwick Hospital, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, UK
- Healthier Weight Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - Markos Daskalakis
- Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Healthier Weight Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rishi Singhal
- Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Healthier Weight Centre, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Comment on: Upper endoscopy after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: diagnostic yield and factors associated with relevant findings. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16:876-877. [PMID: 32376205 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
17
|
van Berckel MMG, Ederveen JC, Nederend J, Nienhuijs SW. Internal Herniation and Weight Loss in Patients after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obes Surg 2020; 30:2652-2658. [DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04542-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
18
|
Blom-Høgestøl IK, Aasbrenn M, Chahal-Kummen M, Brunborg C, Eribe I, Kristinsson J, Farup PG, Mala T. Irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms and health related quality of life two years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass - a prospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19:204. [PMID: 31791249 PMCID: PMC6889730 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1103-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is prevalent in patients with morbid obesity. After Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) chronic abdominal pain is common, however the etiology is largely unknown. We aimed to study the change in the prevalence of IBS-like symptoms 2 years after RYGB and possible preoperative predictors of such symptoms. Secondly, to evaluate changes in symptoms of constipation and diarrhea, and Health related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS Patients with morbid obesity were included at two obesity centers in South-Eastern Norway. IBS was diagnosed according to the Rome III criteria. Predictors were evaluated in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of 307 participants operated with RYGB, 233 (76%) completed the study questionnaires. Preoperatively 27/233 participants (12%) had IBS, 2 years after RYGB 61/233 (26%) had IBS-like symptoms (p < 0.001). Eleven participants with IBS preoperatively (41%) did not report such symptoms after RYGB. New onset IBS-like symptoms was identified in 45/206 (22%) after RYGB. Fibromyalgia, low LDL levels, high vitamin B1 levels and IBS before RYGB were independent preoperative predictors of IBS-like symptoms at the follow-up visit. Symptom scores for constipation preoperatively and 2 year after RYGB were 1.5 (0.9) and 1.8 (1.2), and for diarrhea 1.4 (0.9) and 1.8 (1.1), respectively (p < 0.001). We observed a significant improvement in the physical component score for all participants. However, participants with new onset IBS-like symptoms had a significant worsening of the mental component score. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of IBS-like symptoms doubled 2 years after RYGB, and these symptoms were associated with reduced HRQoL. Preoperative IBS and fibromyalgia were strong predictors of postoperative IBS-like symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingvild Kristine Blom-Høgestøl
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Martin Aasbrenn
- Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Monica Chahal-Kummen
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inger Eribe
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jon Kristinsson
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Paediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per G. Farup
- Unit for Applied Clinical Research, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway
| | - Tom Mala
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Paediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Simoni AH, Ladebo L, Christrup LL, Drewes AM, Johnsen SP, Olesen AE. Chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery. Scand J Pain 2019; 20:239-251. [DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background and aims
Bariatric surgery remains a mainstay for treatment of morbid obesity. However, long-term adverse outcomes include chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use. The aim of this review was to assess the existing data on prevalence, possible mechanisms, risk factors, and outcomes regarding chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery.
Methods
PubMed was screened for relevant literature focusing on chronic abdominal pain, persistent opioid use and pharmacokinetic alterations of opioids after bariatric surgery. Relevant papers were cross-referenced to identify publications possibly not located during the ordinary screening.
Results
Evidence regarding general chronic pain status after bariatric surgery is sparse. However, our literature review revealed that abdominal pain was the most prevalent complication to bariatric surgery, presented in 3–61% of subjects with health care contacts or readmissions 1–5 years after surgery. This could be explained by behavioral, anatomical, and/or functional disorders. Persistent opioid use and doses increased after bariatric surgery, and 4–14% initiated a persistent opioid use 1–7 years after the surgery. Persistent opioid use was associated with severe pain symptoms and was most prevalent among subjects with a lower socioeconomic status. Alteration of absorption and distribution after bariatric surgery may impact opioid effects and increase the risk of adverse events and development of addiction. Changes in absorption have been briefly investigated, but the identified alterations could not be separated from alterations caused solely by excessive weight loss, and medication formulation could influence the findings. Subjects with persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery achieved lower weight loss and less metabolic benefits from the surgery. Thus, remission from comorbidities and cost effectiveness following bariatric surgery may be limited in these subjects.
Conclusions
Pain, especially chronic abdominal, and persistent opioid use were found to be prevalent after bariatric surgery. Physiological, anatomical, and pharmacokinetic changes are likely to play a role. However, the risk factors for occurrence of chronic abdominal pain and persistent opioid use have only been scarcely examined as have the possible impact of pain and persistent opioid use on clinical outcomes, and health-care costs. This makes it difficult to design targeted preventive interventions, which can identify subjects at risk and prevent persistent opioid use after bariatric surgery. Future studies could imply pharmacokinetic-, pharmacodynamics-, and physiological-based modelling of pain treatment. More attention to social, physiologic, and psychological factors may be warranted in order to identify specific risk profiles of subjects considered for bariatric surgery in order to tailor and optimize current treatment recommendations for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalie H. Simoni
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Service Research (DACS), Department of Clinical Medicine , Aalborg University , Aalborg , Denmark
| | - Louise Ladebo
- Department of Clinical Medicine , Aalborg University , Aalborg , Denmark
- Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Aalborg University Hospital , Aalborg , Denmark
| | - Lona L. Christrup
- Section of Pharmacotherapy, Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - Asbjørn M. Drewes
- Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Aalborg University Hospital , Aalborg , Denmark
| | - Søren P. Johnsen
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Service Research (DACS), Department of Clinical Medicine , Aalborg University , Aalborg , Denmark
| | - Anne E. Olesen
- Department of Clinical Medicine , Aalborg University , Aalborg , Denmark
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology , Aalborg University Hospital , Gartnerboligen, Ground Floor, Mølleparkvej 8a , 9000 Aalborg , Denmark , Phone: +45 97664376
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chahal-Kummen M, Blom-Høgestøl IK, Eribe I, Klungsøyr O, Kristinsson J, Mala T. Abdominal pain and symptoms before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. BJS Open 2019; 3:317-326. [PMID: 31183448 PMCID: PMC6551394 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite increased emphasis on patient‐reported outcomes, few studies have focused on abdominal pain symptoms before and after Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The aim of this study was to quantify chronic abdominal pain (CAP) in relation to RYGB. Methods Patients with morbid obesity planned for RYGB were invited to participate at a tertiary referral centre from February 2014 to June 2015. Participants completed a series of seven questionnaires before and 2 years after RYGB. CAP was defined as patient‐reported presence of long‐term or recurrent abdominal pain lasting for more than 3 months. Results A total of 236 patients were included, of whom 209 (88·6 per cent) attended follow‐up. CAP was reported by 28 patients (11·9 per cent) at baseline and 60 (28·7 per cent) at follow‐up (P < 0·001). Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) scores (except reflux scores) and symptoms of anxiety increased from baseline to follow‐up. Most quality of life (QoL) scores (except role emotional, mental health and mental component scores) also increased. At follow‐up, patients with CAP had higher GSRS scores than those without CAP, with large effect sizes for abdominal pain and indigestion syndrome scores. Patients with CAP had more symptoms of anxiety, higher levels of catastrophizing and lower QoL scores. Baseline CAP seemed to predict CAP at follow‐up. Conclusion The prevalence of CAP is higher 2 years after RYGB compared with baseline values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Chahal-Kummen
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - I K Blom-Høgestøl
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - I Eribe
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | - O Klungsøyr
- Department of Biostatistics, Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| | - J Kristinsson
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | - T Mala
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| |
Collapse
|