Impact of bariatric surgery on carotid intima-media thickness, flow-mediated dilation, and nitrite-mediated dilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The association of bariatric surgery with myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization: a propensity score match analysis of National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND

Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) not only leads to a durable weight loss but also lowers mortality, and reduces cardiovascular risks.

OBJECTIVES

The current study aims to investigate the association of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) with admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), as well as, coronary revascularization procedures, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and thrombolysis.

SETTING

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

METHODS

The NIS data from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. A propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was performed to match patients with history of MBS with non-MBS group.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-three thousand seven hundred twenty-nine patients from the non-MBS group were matched with 233,729 patients with history of MBS. The MBS group had about 52% reduced odds of admission for AMI compared to the non-MBS group (adjusted odd ratio: .477, 95% confidence interval: .454-.502, P value <.001). In addition, the odds of STEMI and NSEMI were significantly lower in the MBS group in comparison to the non-MBS group. Also, the MBS group had significantly lower odds of CABG, PCI, and thrombolysis compared to the non-MBS group. In addition, in patients with AMI, MBS was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odd ratio: .627, 95% confidence interval: .469-.839, P value = .004), length of hospital stays, and total charges.

CONCLUSIONS

History of MBS is significantly associated with reduced risk of admission for AMI including STEMI and NSTEMI, as well as the, need for coronary revascularization such as PCI and CABG.

The Impact of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery on Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

PURPOSE

There is a strong association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and obesity which are both important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The current study aimed to assess the association of MBS with different CVDs in patients with MASLD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed by using ICD-10 codes. A propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was done to match the MBS and non-MBS groups.

RESULTS

After weighted analysis, 1,124,155 and 68,215 patients were included in non-MBS and MBS groups, respectively. MBS was associated with significantly lower risk of hospitalization for coronary artery disease (OR 0.633 (0.569-0.703), p value < 0.001), acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.606 (0.523-0.701), p value < 0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 0.578 (0.489-0.682), p value < 0.001), and thrombolysis (OR 0.765 (0.589-0.993), p value = 0.044) compared to the non-MBS group in patients with MASLD. Furthermore, MBS was associated with 52% reduced risk of hospitalization for hemorrhagic stroke in patients with MASLD (OR 0.481, 95% CI 0.337-0.686, p value < 0.001). However, ischemic stroke was not significant between the two groups (OR 1.108 (0.905-1.356), p value = 0.322). In addition, MBS was associated with 63% and 60% reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with MASLD (OR 0.373, 95% CI 0.300-0.465 and OR 0.405, 95% CI 0.325-0.504, p value < 0.001 for both), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed that MBS is significantly associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization for CVD in patients with MASLD.

Early diagnostic value of carotid artery ultrasound parameters combined with epicardial adipose layer thickness in coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease is associated with coronary atherosclerosis indicated by carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) thickening and altered vascular elasticity. The epicardial adipose layer can secrete proinflammatory factors that promote the formation of coronary atherosclerosis. Thus, the epicardial fat layer thickness (EAT) may also predict coronary heart disease.

AIM

To determine the role of common carotid artery ultrasound parameters and EAT in the early diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Based on coronary angiography, patients with newly suspected coronary heart disease were divided into case (n = 107) and control (n = 41) groups. The carotid ultrasound parameters, including vascular stiffness (β), elastic coefficient (EP), pulse wave conduction velocity (PWV-β), CIMT, and EAT were compared between the case and control groups and among patients with different lesion numbers in the case group. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the early diagnostic value of EAT, common carotid artery elasticity, and CIMT for coronary heart disease.

RESULTS

EP, β, PWV-β, CIMT, and EAT were significantly higher in the case group compared with the levels in the control group (all P < 0.001). In the case group, lesions were detected in one vessel in 34 patients, two vessels in 38 patients, and three vessels in 35 patients. Within the case group, β, EP, PWV-β, CIMT, and EAT levels significantly increased with an increased number of lesions (all P < 0.001). EAT positively correlated with β, EP, PWV-β, and CIMT (all P < 0.01). The area under the curve for diagnosing coronary heart disease using EAT combined with CIMT and carotid elasticity was 0.893, and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.890 and 0.837.

CONCLUSION

EAT correlated well with changes in carotid artery elasticity and CIMT in patients with coronary heart disease. The combination of EAT, carotid artery elasticity, and CIMT facilitates the early diagnosis of coronary heart disease.

Metabolic surgery in improving arterial health in obese individuals

PURPOSE

Arterial stiffness has gained recognition as a stand-alone risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Obesity is intricately linked to elevated arterial stiffness, the development of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, and the emergence of diastolic dysfunction, all of which collectively contribute substantially to an unfavorable prognosis. Weight loss has become a standard recommendation for all patients with CVD concurrent with morbid obesity; however, randomized evidence to support this recommendation was limited earlier. The latest scientific studies revealed dynamic changes in aortic stiffness after substantial weight loss by bariatric surgery, also known as metabolic surgery, in patients with obesity. There is also a favorable evolution in LV hypertrophy and a significant impact on arterial hypertension and other promising cardiovascular outcomes in obese people after bariatric surgery.

METHODS/RESULTS

We aimed to examine the cardiovascular effects of various metabolic surgeries in morbidly obese individuals, especially their role in improving arterial health, the potential impact on surrogate markers of atherosclerotic vascular disease, and consequently reducing the likelihood of cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, metabolic surgery is associated with a significant decrease in the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality among obese individuals, alongside remarkable enhancement of arterial health. These findings underscore the critical importance of implementing strategies to combat obesity and reduce adiposity within the general population.

Bariatric Surgery and Risk of Hospitalization for Gastrointestinal Cancers in the USA: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis of National Inpatient Sample Study

BACKGROUND

There are some concerns about the higher risk of certain gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in patients with a history of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS). The current study aimed to investigate the association of BMS with GI cancer hospital admission including esophageal, gastric, colorectal, small intestinal, liver, gallbladder, bile duct, and pancreatic cancers.

METHODS

The analysis utilized the US national inpatient sample (NIS) data from 2016 to 2020, employing ICD-10 codes. A propensity score matching in a 3:1 ratio was done to match the BMS and non-BMS groups.

RESULTS

A total of 328,369 patients with a history of BMS and 4,989,154 with obesity and without a history of BMS were included in this study. BMS was independently associated with a higher risk of gastric and pancreatic cancers hospital admission (OR: 1.69 (CI 95%: 1.42-2.01) and OR: 1.46 (CI 95%: 1.27-1.68)), respectively. In addition, BMS was independently associated with a lower risk of colorectal and liver cancer hospital admission (OR: 0.57 (CI 95%: 0.52-0.62) and OR: 0.72 (CI 95%: 0.52-0.98)), respectively. Besides, esophageal, gallbladder, bile duct, and small intestinal cancer were not significantly different between the two groups. In patients with GI cancer, although the BMS group had significantly lower total charges and length of hospital stay compared to the non-BMS group, the rate of in-hospital mortality was not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed that bariatric surgery may be associated with a higher risk of gastric and pancreatic cancer and a lower risk of colorectal and liver cancer hospital admission. Further research is needed to explore this association.

The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Patients with Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The current study aims to evaluate the effect of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with diagnosed heart failure (HF). Fourteen related articles with 217 patients were included in the final analysis. LVEF significantly improved after BMS in patients with HF with a mean difference of 7.78% (CI 95%: 3.72, 11.84, I2 = 83.75, p-value < 0.001). Also, the NYHA class significantly decreased after BMS with a mean difference of - 0.40 (CI 95%: - 0.62, - 0.19, I2: 47.03, p-value < 0.001). A total of 27 patients with obesity and HF were listed for cardiac transplantation after BMS. Of those, 20 patients successfully underwent heart transplantation after BMS.