In sickness and in health: Same-sex marriage laws and sexually transmitted infections

Effects of marriage equality legislation on sexual health of the US population

Even though prior research has investigated the relationship between same-sex partnership recognition policies and health outcomes, the impact of same-sex marriage laws on sexually transmitted infections has not received much attention. Using state-level panel data from 2000 to 2019, I show that marriage equality legislation decreases the spread of (shorter-term) syphilis infections and of (longer-term) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) infections among the general population. Event study analyses correcting for non-staggered treatment implementation confirm these negative effects, but also suggest that standard difference-in-differences models understate the impact of the legislation by up to 8% points. Further analysis supports that these legislation effects operate through three mechanisms: increasing social tolerance, strengthening relationship commitment, and expanding health care access and coverage for HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment. Disaggregating the results by sexual behavior reveals that legal access to same-sex marriage leads to sizable decreases in AIDS rates among men who have sex with men (MSM) (the most at-risk population for an infection). Even though there is economically significant evidence that the legislation improves sexual health of the heterosexual population due to increased utilization of preventive sexual health care, the legislation does not have a direct impact on infection rates for the non-MSM population.

Quasi experimental study of same-sex marriage laws & sexually transmitted infections

Objectives

On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriages in the United States. This change has had some positive implications for the health of Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals and public health in general. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common among LGBT individuals and legalization of same sex marriage effected the rate of emergency department (ED) visits for STIs. We examined the effect of same-sex marriage legalization on emergency department visits related to STIs among LGBT individuals.

Study design

Quasi-experimental difference-in-difference negative binomial design is used with state and time fixed-effects. We used data for 16 states from State Emergency Department Database and State Inpatient Database from January 2007-December 2015. People over 18 years of age visited the ED for STIs were included.

Results

At 5% significance level, number of STIs cases decreased by 6.1% (95% CI, 0.906-0.973; P = 0.001) after same-sex marriage legalization. When adjusting for sex, these cases decreased by 7.6% (95% CI, 0.885-0.966; P < 0.001) for females, and 4.7% (95% CI, 0.914-0.995; P = 0.027) for males. By age cohorts, 18-24 aged had 8.5% (95% CI, 0.875-0.957; P < 0.001) decrease, while older age cohorts was statistically insignificant.

Conclusions

Our results show that there is an association between legalization and decreased STIs cases in ED visits. Policy makers need to focus on encouraging a positive attitude towards LGBT community, as it leads to better quality of health for sexual minority groups and leads to positive externalities for general community.

The Direct Effects of Legal Same-Sex Marriage in the United States: Evidence From Massachusetts

I provide evidence on the direct effects of legal same-sex marriage in the United States by studying Massachusetts, the first state to legalize it in 2004 by court order. Using confidential Massachusetts data from 2001–2013, I show that the ruling significantly increased marriage among lesbians, bisexual women, and gay men compared with the associated change for heterosexuals. I find no significant effects on coupling. Marriage take-up effects are larger for lesbians than for bisexual women or gay men and are larger for households with children than for households without children. Consistent with prior work in the United States and Europe, I find no reductions in heterosexual marriage.

Trends in State Policy Support for Sexual Minorities and HIV-Related Outcomes Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States, 2008-2014

BACKGROUND

To examine trends in state-level policy support for sexual minorities and HIV outcomes among men who have sex with men (MSM).

METHODS

This longitudinal analysis linked state-level policy support for sexual minorities [N = 94 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in 38 states] to 7 years of data (2008-2014) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on HIV outcomes among MSM. Using latent growth mixture modeling, we combined 11 state-level policies (eg, nondiscrimination laws including sexual orientation as a protected class) from 1999 to 2014, deriving the following 3 latent groups: consistently low policy support, consistently high policy support, and increasing trajectory of policy support. Outcomes were HIV diagnoses per 10,000 MSM, late diagnoses (number of deaths within 12 months of HIV diagnosis and AIDS diagnoses within 3 months of HIV diagnosis) per 10,000 MSM, AIDS diagnoses per 10,000 MSM with HIV, and AIDS-related mortality per 10,000 MSM with AIDS.

RESULTS

Compared with MSAs in states with low policy support and increasing policy support for sexual minorities, MSAs in states with the highest level of policy support had lower risks of HIV diagnoses [risk difference (RD) = -37.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): -54.7 to -21.0], late diagnoses (RD = -12.5, 95% CI: -20.4 to -4.7), and AIDS-related mortality (RD = -33.7, 95% CI: -61.2 to -6.2), controlling for time and 7 MSA-level covariates. In low policy support states, 27% of HIV diagnoses, 21% of late diagnoses, and 10% of AIDS deaths among MSM were attributable to the policy climate.

CONCLUSION

The state-level policy climate related to sexual minorities was associated with HIV health outcomes among MSM and could be a potential public health tool for HIV prevention and care.

Geographic correlates of primary and secondary syphilis among men who have sex with men in the United States

PURPOSE

Primary and secondary (P&S) syphilis in men who have sex with men (MSM) has been increasing; however, there is a lack of research on geographic factors associated with MSM P&S syphilis.

METHODS

We used multiple data sources to examine associations between social and environmental factors and MSM P&S syphilis rates at the state- and county-level in 2014 and 2015, separately. General linear models were used for state-level analyses, and hurdle models were used for county-level models. Bivariate analyses (P < .25) were used to select variables for adjusted models.

RESULTS

In 2014 and 2015 state models, a higher percentage of impoverished persons (2014 β = 1.24, 95% confidence interval, 0.28-2.20; 2015 β = 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-1.97) was significantly associated with higher MSM P&S syphilis rates. In the 2015 county model, policies related to sexual orientation (marriage, housing, hate crimes) were significant correlates of MSM P&S syphilis rates (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our state-level findings that poverty is associated with MSM P&S syphilis are consistent with research at the individual level across different subpopulations and various sexually transmitted diseases. Our findings also suggest that more research is needed to further evaluate potential associations between policies and sexually transmitted diseases. Geographic-level interventions to address these determinants may help curtail the rising syphilis rates and their sequelae in MSM.

State and local policies related to sexual orientation in the United States

Poorer health suffered by lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) populations may be associated with public policies. We collected the laws that in 2013 prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation from 50 United States (US) states, the District of Columbia (Washington, DC or DC), and the 30 most populous US metropolitan areas. To facilitate future research, we coded certain aspects of these laws to create a dataset. We generated descriptive statistics by jurisdiction type and tested for regional differences in state law using Chi-square tests. Sixteen (31.4 per cent) states prohibited discrimination by all employers based on sexual orientation, 25 states (49.0 per cent) in public employment, 18 states (35.3 per cent) in government contracting, and 21 states (41.2 per cent) in private employment. Twenty-one states prohibited discrimination (41.2 per cent) in housing practices (selling and renting), and 17 (33.3 per cent) in public accommodations. Local (county/city) laws prohibiting discrimination were less common. State laws differed significantly by US census region - West, Midwest, Northeast, and South. Future analyses of these data could examine the impact of these laws on various outcomes, including health among LGB populations.

Marriage equality is a mental health issue

OBJECTIVE

We aim to review marriage equality in New Zealand and Australia and critically evaluate the health impact of such a legal change.

METHOD

We undertook a review of the literature using the search terms "marriage equality", "same sex marriage" and "gay marriage" in combination with "health", "wellbeing", "psych*", "mental illness" and "distress". This search included medical literature, legal literature and mass media.

RESULTS

This review indicates that Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) people disproportionately face negative health stressors and negative health events compared with the general population and this is related to the stress of being a stigmatised minority group. The evidence strongly supports the proposition that marriage equality is related to improved health outcomes. A diverse range of professional health groups advocate for the legislative progression to marriage equality. The authors found no evidence that marriage equality harms opposite-sex marriage.

CONCLUSION

Marriage equality is still lacking in Australia and as a positive correlate of health should be strongly supported.

Moving toward a holistic conceptual framework for understanding healthy aging among gay men

In the last four decades, we have witnessed vast and important transitions in the social, economic, political, and health contexts of the lived experiences of gay men in the United States. This dynamic period, as evidenced most prominently by the transition of the gay rights movement to a civil rights movement, has shifted the exploration of gay men's health from one focusing primarily on HIV/AIDS into a mainstream consideration of the overall health and wellbeing of gay men. Against this backdrop, aging gay men in the United States constitute a growing population, for whom further investigations of health states and health-related disparities are warranted. In order to advance our understanding of the health and wellbeing of aging gay men, we outline here a multilevel, ecosocial conceptual framework that integrates salient environmental, social, psychosocial, and sociodeomgraphic factors into sets of macro-, meso-, and micro-level constructs that can be applied to comprehensively study health states and health care utilization in older gay men.

HIV-related social intolerance and risky sexual behavior in a high HIV prevalence environment

Although most countries state that fighting social intolerance against persons with HIV is part of their national HIV strategy, the impact of reducing intolerance on risky sexual behavior is largely unknown. In this paper, we estimate the effect of social intolerance against HIV+ persons on risky sexual behavior in rural Malawi using data from roughly 2000 respondents from the 2004 and 2006 waves of the Malawi Longitudinal Study of Families and Health (MLSFH). The effect of social intolerance on risky behavior is a priori ambiguous. On the one hand, higher social intolerance or stigma can lead people to disassociate from the stigmatized group and hence promote risky behavior. On the other hand, intolerance can be viewed as a social tax on being HIV+ and thus higher intolerance may reduce risky behavior. We find that a decrease in social intolerance is associated with a decrease in risky behavior, including fewer partners and a lower likelihood of having extra-marital relations. This effect is mainly driven by the impact of social intolerance on men. Overall the results suggests that reducing social intolerance might not only benefit the HIV positive but might also forestall the spread of HIV.