1
|
Millest A, Saeed S, Symons C, Carter H. Effect of face-covering use on adherence to other COVID-19 protective behaviours: A systematic review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0284629. [PMID: 38603671 PMCID: PMC11008824 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns were raised that face covering use may elicit risk compensation; a false sense of security resulting in reduced adherence to other protective behaviours such as physical distancing. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effect of face covering use on adherence to other COVID-19 related protective behaviours. Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, EmCare, medRxiv preprints, Research Square and WHO COVID-19 Research Database were searched for all primary research studies published from 1st January 2020 to 17th May 2022 that investigated the effect of face covering use on adherence to other protective behaviours in public settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Papers were selected and screened in accordance with the PRISMA framework. Backwards and forwards citation searches of included papers were also conducted on 16th September 2022, with eligible papers published between 1st January 2020 and that date being included. A quality appraisal including risk of bias was assessed using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Quality Criteria Checklist. This review is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42022331961. 47 papers were included, with quality ranging from low to high. These papers investigated the effects of face covering use and face covering policies on adherence to six categories of behaviour: physical distancing; mobility; face-touching; hand hygiene; close contacts; and generalised protective behaviour. Results reveal no consistent evidence for or against risk compensation, with findings varying according to behaviour and across study types, and therefore confident conclusions cannot be made. Any policy decisions related to face coverings must consider the inconsistencies and caveats in this evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Millest
- Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sidra Saeed
- Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charles Symons
- Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Holly Carter
- Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tovissodé CF, Baumgaertner B. Heterogeneous risk tolerance, in-groups, and epidemic waves. FRONTIERS IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS 2024; 10:1360001. [PMID: 38818516 PMCID: PMC11138946 DOI: 10.3389/fams.2024.1360001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
There is a growing interest in the joint modeling of the dynamics of disease and health-related beliefs and attitudes, but coupling mechanisms are yet to be understood. We introduce a model where risk information, which can be delayed, comes in two flavors, including historical risk derived from perceived incidence data and predicted risk information. Our model also includes an interpretation domain where the behavioral response to risk information is subject to in-group pressure. We then simulate how the strength of behavioral reaction impacts epidemic severity as measured by epidemic peak size, number of waves, and final size. Simulated behavioral response is not effective when the level of protection that prophylactic behavior provides is as small as 50% or lower. At a higher level of 75% or more, we see the emergence of multiple epidemic waves. In addition, simulations show that different behavioral response profiles can lead to various epidemic outcomes that are non-monotonic with the strength of reaction to risk information. We also modeled heterogeneity in the response profile of a population and find they can lead to less severe epidemic outcome in terms of peak size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bert Baumgaertner
- Department of Politics and Philosophy, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wei R, Zhang Y, Gao S, Brown BJ, Hu S, Link BG. Health disparity in the spread of COVID-19: Evidence from social distancing, risk of interactions, and access to testing. Health Place 2023; 82:103031. [PMID: 37120950 PMCID: PMC10126219 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE - To identify and assess whether three major risk factors that due to differential access to flexible resources might help explain disparities in the spread of COVID-19 across communities with different socioeconomic status, including socioeconomic inequalities in social distancing, the potential risk of interpersonal interactions, and access to testing. METHODS Analysis uses ZIP code level weekly COVID-19 new cases, weekly population movement flows, weekly close-contact index, and weekly COVID-19 testing sites in Southern California from March 2020 to April 2021, merged with the U.S. census data to measure ZIP code level socioeconomic status and cofounders. This study first develops the measures for social distancing, the potential risk of interactions, and access to testing. Then we employ a spatial lag regression model to quantify the contributions of those factors to weekly COVID-19 case growth. RESULTS Results identify that, during the first COVID-19 wave, new case growth of the low-income group is two times higher than that of the high-income group. The COVID-19 case disparity widens to four times in the second COVID-19 wave. We also observed significant disparities in social distancing, the potential risk of interactions, and access to testing among communities with different socioeconomic status. In addition, all of them contribute to the disparities of COVID-19 incidences. Among them, the potential risk of interactions is the most important contributor, whereas testing accessibility contributes least. We also found that close-contact is a more effective measure of social distancing than population movements in examining the spread of COVID-19. CONCLUSION - This study answers critically unaddressed questions about health disparities in the spread of COVID-19 by assessing factors that might explain why the spread is different in different groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Wei
- School of Public Policy, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
| | - Yujia Zhang
- School of Public Policy, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
| | - Song Gao
- GeoDS Lab, Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| | - Brandon J Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
| | - Songhua Hu
- Maryland Transportation Institute, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
| | - Bruce G Link
- School of Public Policy, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wibowo RA, Hartarto RB, Bhattacharjee A, Wardani DTK, Sambodo NP, Santoso Utomo P, Annisa L, Hakim MS, Sofyana M, Dewi FST. Facilitators and barriers of preventive behaviors against COVID-19 during Ramadan: A phenomenology of Indonesian adults. Front Public Health 2023; 11:960500. [PMID: 37033074 PMCID: PMC10073479 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.960500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Intercity mobility restriction, physical distancing, and mask-wearing are preventive behaviors to reduce the transmission of COVID-19. However, strong cultural and religious traditions become particular challenges in Indonesia. This study uses the Behavior Change Wheel to explore barriers and facilitators for intercity mobility restriction, physical distancing, and mask-wearing during Ramadan. Methods Semi-structured in-depth interviews with 50 Indonesian adults were conducted between 10 April and 4 June 2020. Having mapped codes into the Capacity, Opportunity, Motivation - Behavior (COM-B), and Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) model, we conducted summative content analysis to analyze the most identified factors to preventive behaviors and proposed interventions to address those factors. Results Belief about the consequence of preventive behaviors was the most mentioned facilitator to all preventive behaviors among compliers. However, optimism as a TDF factor was commonly mentioned as a barrier to preventive behaviors among non-compliers, while environmental context and resources were the most commonly mentioned factors for intercity mobility restriction. Conclusions Public health intervention should be implemented considering the persuasion and involvement of religious and local leaders. Concerning job and economic context, policy related to the intercity mobility restriction should be reconsidered to prevent a counterproductive effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhmat Ari Wibowo
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Romi Bhakti Hartarto
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Arnab Bhattacharjee
- Edinburgh Business School, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- The National Institute of Economic and Social Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dyah Titis Kusuma Wardani
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Novat Pugo Sambodo
- Center for Health Financing Policy and Health Insurance Management, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Prattama Santoso Utomo
- Department of Medical Education and Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Luthvia Annisa
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Mohamad Saifudin Hakim
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Meida Sofyana
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Fatwa Sari Tetra Dewi
- Department of Health Behavior, Environment and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wall R, Evers J, Haydock D. An International Systematic Review Concerning the Effect of Social Media Exposure on Public Compliance with Infection Prevention and Control Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Infect Prev 2023; 24:103-112. [PMID: 37051306 PMCID: PMC9950031 DOI: 10.1177/17571774231159574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Effective health communication is crucial for achieving positive population health outcomes. This is important for infection prevention and control (IPC), which relies on widespread public compliance to be effective. Whilst social media (SM) platforms disseminate health information, there is conflicting evidence to suggest their influence on compliance with public health guidelines. Objective To appraise the available evidence and determine the extent to which social media exposure contributes to public compliance with IPC measures. Methods A systematic protocol based on the MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines was followed. Observational studies were identified through systematic searches of four electronic databases and a hand search. Following data extraction, eligible studies were quality assessed, and the findings were integrated using narrative synthesis. Findings 15 studies were included. The studies located presented heterogeneous designs and findings. A weak positive association was identified, with 60% of the studies observing a positive association between social media and compliance with IPC measures. 26.7% identified a negative correlation, and 13.3% identified no correlation. Several factors were identified to mediate the relationship, including knowledge and conspiracy beliefs. Discussion This systematic review identified a weak positive correlation between exposure to social media and public compliance with recommended IPC measures, suggesting that social media should be utilised in future IPC related communication strategies. Social media provides a cost-effective, publicly accessible platform to disseminate accurate information, and neutralise misinformation. Recommendations are made for further research to reduce the uncertainty created by the identification of heterogenous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Wall
- University of Chester, Riverside Campus Castle Drive Chester CH1 1SL United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jean Evers
- University of Chester, Riverside Campus Castle Drive Chester CH1 1SL United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Deborah Haydock
- University of Chester, Riverside Campus Castle Drive Chester CH1 1SL United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nat Hum Behav 2023; 7:74-101. [PMID: 36344657 PMCID: PMC9883171 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
One of today's most controversial and consequential issues is whether the global uptake of digital media is causally related to a decline in democracy. We conducted a systematic review of causal and correlational evidence (N = 496 articles) on the link between digital media use and different political variables. Some associations, such as increasing political participation and information consumption, are likely to be beneficial for democracy and were often observed in autocracies and emerging democracies. Other associations, such as declining political trust, increasing populism and growing polarization, are likely to be detrimental to democracy and were more pronounced in established democracies. While the impact of digital media on political systems depends on the specific variable and system in question, several variables show clear directions of associations. The evidence calls for research efforts and vigilance by governments and civil societies to better understand, design and regulate the interplay of digital media and democracy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Schmidt-Petri C, Schröder C, Okubo T, Graeber D, Rieger T. Social Norms and Preventive Behaviors in Japan and Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health 2022; 10:842177. [PMID: 35433575 PMCID: PMC9010522 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background According to a recent paper by Gelfand et al., COVID-19 infection and case mortality rates are closely connected to the strength of social norms: “Tighter” cultures that abide by strict social norms are more successful in combating the pandemic than “looser” cultures that are more permissive. However, countries with similar levels of cultural tightness exhibit big differences in mortality rates. We are investigating potential explanations for this fact. Using data from Germany and Japan—two “tight” countries with very different infection and mortality rates—we examined how differences in socio-demographic and other determinants explain differences in individual preventive attitudes and behaviors. Methods We compared preventive attitudes and behaviors in 2020 based on real-time representative survey data and used logit regression models to study how individual attitudes and behaviors are shaped by four sets of covariates: individual socio-demographics, health, personality, and regional-level controls. Employing Blinder-Oaxaca regression techniques, we quantified the extent to which differences in averages of the covariates between Japan and Germany explain the differences in the observed preventive attitudes and behaviors. Results In Germany and Japan, similar proportions of the population supported mandatory vaccination, avoided travel, and avoided people with symptoms of a cold. In Germany, however, a significantly higher proportion washed their hands frequently and avoided crowds, physical contact, public transport, peak-hour shopping, and contact with the elderly. In Japan, a significantly higher proportion were willing to be vaccinated. We also show that attitudes and behaviors varied significantly more with covariates in Germany than in Japan. Differences in averages of the covariates contribute little to explaining the observed differences in preventive attitudes and behaviors between the two countries. Conclusion Consistent with tightness-looseness theory, the populations of Japan and Germany responded similarly to the pandemic. The observed differences in infection and fatality rates therefore cannot be explained by differences in behavior. The major difference in attitudes is the willingness to be vaccinated, which was much higher in Japan. Furthermore, the Japanese population behaved more uniformly across social groups than the German population. This difference in the degree of homogeneity has important implications for the effectiveness of policy measures during the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Schmidt-Petri
- Department of Philosophy, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
- *Correspondence: Christoph Schmidt-Petri
| | - Carsten Schröder
- Socio-Economic Panel, DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research), Berlin, Germany
- Department of Economics, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Carsten Schröder
| | - Toshihiro Okubo
- Faculty of Economics, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Toshihiro Okubo
| | - Daniel Graeber
- Socio-Economic Panel, DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research), Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Rieger
- Socio-Economic Panel, DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Friedman SR, Jordan AE, Perlman DC, Nikolopoulos GK, Mateu-Gelabert P. Emerging Zoonotic Infections, Social Processes and Their Measurement and Enhanced Surveillance to Improve Zoonotic Epidemic Responses: A "Big Events" Perspective. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19020995. [PMID: 35055817 PMCID: PMC8776232 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Zoonotic epidemics and pandemics have become frequent. From HIV/AIDS through COVID-19, they demonstrate that pandemics are social processes as well as health occurrences. The roots of these pandemics lie in changes in the socioeconomic interface between humanity and non-human host species that facilitate interspecies transmission. The degree to which zoonoses spread has been increased by the greater speed and extent of modern transportation and trade. Pre-existing sociopolitical and economic structures and conflicts in societies also affect pathogen propagation. As an epidemic develops, it can itself become a social and political factor, and change and interact with pre-existing sociobehavioral norms and institutional structures. This paper uses a "Big Events" approach to frame these processes. Based on this framework, we discuss how social readiness surveys implemented both before and during an outbreak might help public health predict how overall systems might react to an epidemic and/or to disease control measures, and thus might inform interventions to mitigate potential adverse outcomes or possibly preventing outbreaks from developing into epidemics. We conclude by considering what "pathways measures", in addition to those we and others have already developed, might usefully be developed and validated to assist outbreak and epidemic disease responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel R. Friedman
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research, New York, NY 10003, USA; (A.E.J.); (D.C.P.); (P.M.-G.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Ashly E. Jordan
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research, New York, NY 10003, USA; (A.E.J.); (D.C.P.); (P.M.-G.)
| | - David C. Perlman
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research, New York, NY 10003, USA; (A.E.J.); (D.C.P.); (P.M.-G.)
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | | | - Pedro Mateu-Gelabert
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research, New York, NY 10003, USA; (A.E.J.); (D.C.P.); (P.M.-G.)
- Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY 10027, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rodrigues DL. Regulatory focus and perceived safety with casual partners: implications for perceived risk and casual sex intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic. PSYCHOLOGY & SEXUALITY 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/19419899.2021.2018355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David L. Rodrigues
- Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Iscte–Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, CIS-Iscte, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lanfranchi D, Grassi L. Examining insurance companies' use of technology for innovation. THE GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE. ISSUES AND PRACTICE 2021; 47:520-537. [PMID: 34803334 PMCID: PMC8593633 DOI: 10.1057/s41288-021-00258-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The insurance industry is innovating. Business models, services and processes are rapidly evolving, largely backed by technological developments. The particular historical context of COVID-19 provides a suitable case to understand the relevance of exploiting technology to react quickly to traditional and emerging risks. Focusing on the initiatives put in place by the most influential insurance companies at the global level, we have framed the innovation mechanisms in the industry, highlighting four rationales underpinning these initiatives (Adaption, Expansion, Reaction and Aggression), which differ according to the relevance of the technology in use and innovation to the portfolio of risks covered. Overall, it emerges that insurance companies have the room and capability to innovate, in many cases using technological applications to cover new and existing risks. While the initiatives studied concern the entire value chain, basic primary activities, such as product development, sales and claims management, show that innovation based on new or existing technology determines the success and competitiveness of the business.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Grassi
- School of Management, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|