Assessment and Measurement of Adherence to Oral Antineoplastic Agents

Patient reported medication-related problems, adherence and waste of oral anticancer medication over time

OBJECTIVES

Patients on oral anticancer therapy regularly experience medication-related problems (MRPs), potentially leading to non-adherence and medication waste. Most studies reporting these experiences have cross-sectional designs. The aim of our study was to explore patient reported MRPs, adherence and waste of oral anticancer medication over time.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal quantitative interview study with 4 months follow-up was performed among patients on oral anticancer medication (mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitors, (anti)hormonal therapy, pyrimidine antagonists) using a semi-structured questionnaire. Patients from two Dutch university medical centres were included from March to December 2022 after informed consent was given. Four interviews were performed with 1 month in between. All interviews were audiotaped, after which the data were entered into an electronic case report form. The primary outcome was the mean number of MRPs per patient per interview round. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with at least one MRP, types of MRPs, perceived non-adherence, medication waste (both in general and specifically for anticancer medication), costs of anticancer medication waste, and factors associated with medication waste as mentioned by the patient. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 64 (9) years; 43% were male. The mean number of MRPs per patient was 2.1 in the first interview and 1.2, 1.0 and 0.9 in the second, third and fourth interviews, respectively. Adverse drug reactions were the most frequently reported type of MRPs (30 (75%) patients in the first interview and 19 (65%) in the last interview). Unintentional non-adherence was regularly reported, especially in the first interview. Medication changes were frequent and associated medication waste was mentioned in all interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients using oral anticancer treatment report MRPs and this number remains substantial over time.

[Therapeutic education of patients taking oral chemotherapy at home]

Oral cancer drugs make the patient more active and autonomous. They reduce the number of hospital appointments and the risk of infection. However, they result in new problems such as the management of side effects. In this context, therapeutic education is essential. The first French therapeutic education programme for patients taking oral cancer drugs at home has been set up.

Using Information Technology in the Assessment and Monitoring of Geriatric Oncology Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Older adults with cancer have complex medical needs and often experience higher rates of treatment-related toxicities compared to their younger counterparts. The advent of health information technologies can address multiple gaps in the care of this population. We review the role of existing and emerging technologies in facilitating the use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in routine clinics, promoting symptom reporting, and monitoring medication adherence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasingly, studies demonstrate the feasibility of implementing electronic CGA in routine oncology practices. Evidence also suggests that electronic symptom reporting can improve outcomes in patients with cancer. In addition, technology devices can be used to promote adherence to cancer therapy. There are many opportunities for information technology to be integrated into the management and treatment of older adults with cancer. However, further evaluation of these technologies is needed to ensure that they meet the needs of the targeted end users.

Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy for steatorrhoea in pancreatic cancer

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To evaluate the efficacy of PERT for the treatment of steatorrhoea in people with pancreatic cancer by accessing whether it:

reduces the severity and duration of common symptoms, including fatty (greasy or oily appearance and residue), foul‐smelling, pale‐coloured, and heavy stools (bulky and difficult‐to‐flush), which are usually associated with weight loss and nutritional deficiencies as a result of fat malabsorption and the concomitant malabsorption of amino acids and vitamins, and abdominal pain or cramps (Cheifetz 2011 ; Kasper 2015 ); is an acceptable treatment, as assessed by the number of side effects/adverse events, study dropout rates, and participant satisfaction levels; has an impact on chemotherapy adherence; has an impact on postoperative outcomes.

The Association Between Patient-Reported and Objective Oral Anticancer Medication Adherence Measures: A Systematic Review

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION

Oral anticancer medication (OAM) use has been steadily increasing, leading to several patient benefits. A notable challenge for nurses is accurate monitoring of patient OAM regimens because nonadherence is associated with poor health outcomes and decreased survival. Currently, no gold standard measure of OAM adherence exists. The authors conducted a systematic review of the association between objective and patient-reported measures of OAM adherence.
.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A systematic electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO®, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL® databases through November 2014. 
.

DATA EVALUATION

Articles were independently reviewed to determine whether they included an original characterization of the level of association between objective and patient-reported measures of OAM adherence.
.

SYNTHESIS

From a total of 11,135 articles retrieved, eight studies met inclusion criteria. Objective adherence was primarily assessed using pill counts or Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMSCap™). Patient-reported adherence was most commonly assessed using study-specific questionnaires. Significant positive correlations were observed between objective and patient-reported adherence across most studies, with three studies reporting higher rates of adherence via patient reporting.
.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite variation in the OAMs and measures used, patient-reported adherence rates were equal to or higher than objective adherence measures across studies. Social desirability bias may be a concern; however, given the significant concordance observed, using patient-reported methods in future studies of OAM adherence may be justified. 
.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

This review provides evidence to support nursing use of patient-reported measures to accurately monitor OAM adherence and potentially improve the quality of patient-provider communication.

The oral education clinic: A pharmacist- and nurse-led clinic to support patients starting oral systemic anti-cancer treatments

With the increased number of oral systemic anti-cancer treatments available, patients need to be managed safely and effectively in line with national guidance. In response to guidance in 2011, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust implemented an 'Oral Education Clinic'. This nurse- and pharmacist-led clinic facilitates the delivery of patient education, highlighting key safety aspects of drug administration and management, and ensures follow-up is arranged as per protocol. Patients have found this service to be effective and it has had a positive impact on the running of outpatient units, the volume of triage calls, emergency admissions and workload associated with consenting patients to an oral systemic anti-cancer treatments.

Impact of a specialty pharmacy case management service on adherence in patients receiving oral antineoplastic agents

Background Patients receiving treatment with oral antineoplastic agents encounter several barriers to adherence, which may include high medication costs, limited access to specialty medications, severe adverse effects, complex medication regimens, and special handling precautions. Medication nonadherence not only reduces the efficacy of drug therapy but also has the potential to increase healthcare expenditures due to disease-related hospitalizations. Although several previous studies have examined patient adherence to oral antineoplastic agents, few have examined the impact of a specialty pharmacy case management service. Methods Patient adherence to oral antineoplastic agents was evaluated through a retrospective analysis of pharmacy claims data and medical chart reviews. The medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to quantitatively measure adherence during two 6-month intervals, prior to and following the implementation of a case management service. Patients with an MPR greater than or equal to 0.8 were categorized as adherent, while those with an MPR less than 0.8 were categorized as non-adherent. Results During the first 6-month interval prior to implementation of the case management service (n = 40), a cumulative average MPR of 0.922 was observed. Following implementation of the case management service (n = 56), a non-statistically significant (p = 0.199) increase in MPR to 0.941 was identified. For patients categorized as non-adherent, a nonstatistically significant (p = 0.214) decrease from 15% to 7% was identified following the introduction of the case management service. Conclusion Study results from this retrospective review indicate that case management services provided through an outpatient specialty pharmacy may have the potential to improve patient adherence to oral antineoplastic agents.

Putting evidence into practice: evidence-based interventions for oral agents for cancer

BACKGROUND

The limited evidence available suggests that adherence to oral agents for cancer is a significant clinical problem and may have a substantial impact on treatment success or failure. Adherence is a difficult issue among patients who are very sick with a life-threatening disease who often must adhere to complex treatment protocols independently at home.

OBJECTIVES

This article aims to identify effective interventions for the promotion, treatment, and management of adherence to oral agents for cancer and to synthesize the literature for use in clinical practice.

METHODS

As part of the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) Putting Evidence Into Practice (PEP) initiative, a comprehensive examination of the current literature was conducted to identify effective interventions for patients prescribed oral agents for cancer. The ONS PEP weight-of-evidence classification schema levels of evidence were used to categorize interventions to assist nurses in identifying strategies that are effective at improving adherence.

FINDINGS

The majority of evidence found was conducted in conditions other than cancer; therefore, research is needed to identify whether these interventions are effective at promoting adherence in patients with cancer.

Impacts of a navigation program based on health information technology for patients receiving oral anticancer therapy: the CAPRI randomized controlled trial

Background

The emergence of oral delivery in cancer therapeutics is expected to result in an increased need for better coordination between all treatment stakeholders, mainly to ensure adequate treatment delivery to the patient. There is significant interest in the nurse navigation program’s potential to improve transitions of care by improving communication between treatment stakeholders and by providing personalized organizational assistance to patients. The use of health information technology is another strategy aimed at improving cancer care coordination that can be combined with the NN program to improve remote patient follow-up. However, the potential of these two strategies combined to improve oral treatment delivery is limited by a lack of rigorous evidence of actual impact.

Methods/design

We are conducting a large scale randomized controlled trial designed to assess the impact of a navigation program denoted CAPRI that is based on two Nurse Navigators and a web portal ensuring coordination between community and hospital as well as between patients and navigators, versus routine delivery of oral anticancer therapy. The primary research aim is to assess the impact of the program on treatment delivery for patients with metastatic cancer, as measured by Relative Dose Intensity. The trial involves a number of other outcomes, including tumor response, survival, toxic side effects, patient quality of life and patient experience An economic evaluation adopting a societal perspective will be conducted, in order to estimate those health. care resources’ used. A parallel process evaluation will be conducted to describe implementation of the intervention.

Discussion

If the CAPRI program does improve treatment delivery, the evidence on its economic impact will offer important knowledge for health decision-makers, helping develop new follow-up services for patients receiving oral chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy. The process evaluation will determine the best conditions in which such a program might be implemented.

Trial registration

NCT 02828462. Registered 29 June 2016.

Experiences and coping strategies of oncology patients undergoing oral chemotherapy: First steps of a grounded theory study

PURPOSE

Chemotherapies are increasingly available for oral application. Previous studies have focussed on differences between orally and intravenously administered chemotherapies, mostly following quantitative designs surveying patients' preferences and adherence. The lived experience of patients undergoing oral chemotherapy has been rarely explored. Therefore, this study investigates how patients experience oral chemotherapy.

METHOD

We conducted open interviews with six patients and two spouses. Recruitment took place in the outpatient clinic of an urban Swiss hospital. Data collection and analysis followed the principles of Straussian grounded theory.

RESULTS

The participants reported physical and emotional reluctance towards oral chemotherapy as well as toxic side effects. Feeling responsible emerged as a core phenomenon. All participants intended to adhere to the therapy although this was challenging because of the complex medication regimen. Belief in the effectiveness of the therapy was a strengthening factor.

CONCLUSIONS

All participants reported to be highly adherent to oral chemotherapy. Although they experienced some toxic side effects, they did not react. Monitoring toxicities and support in everyday life should be a core feature of care.

Patterns of treatment and costs of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma management in four Italian centers

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a severe health condition associated with high hospitalizations and mortality rates, which also imposes a relevant economic burden.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present survey is to investigate treatment strategies and related costs for HCC in the intermediate and advanced stages of the disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The survey was conducted in four Italian centers through structured interviews with physicians. Information regarding the stage of disease, treatments performed, and related health care resource consumption was included in the questionnaire. Direct health care cost per patient associated with the most relevant treatments such as sorafenib, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2014, 285 patients with HCC were treated in the four participating centers; of these, 80 were in intermediate stage HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification [BCLC] B), and 57 were in the advanced stage of the disease (BCLC C). In intermediate stage HCC, the most frequent first-line treatment was TACE (63%) followed by sorafenib (15%), radiofrequency ablation (14%), and TARE (1.3%). In the advanced stage of HCC, the most frequently used first-line therapy was sorafenib (56%), followed by best supportive care (21%), TACE (18%), and TARE (3.5%). The total costs of treatment per patient amounted to €12,214.54 with sorafenib, €13,418.49 with TACE, and €26,106.08 with TARE. Both in the intermediate and in the advanced stage of the disease, variability in treatment patterns among centers was observed.

CONCLUSION

The present analysis raises for the first time the awareness of the overall costs incurred by the Italian National Healthcare System for different treatments used in intermediate and advanced HCC. Further investigations would be important to better understand the effective health care resource usage.

Treatment with oral anticancer agents: symptom severity and attribution, and interference with comorbidity management

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence, severity, and attribution of symptoms, as well as the interference with management of comorbidities, in patients who have been prescribed oral anticancer agents (OAs).

DESIGN

Descriptive exploratory study.

SETTING

A comprehensive cancer center and two community-based oncology programs in the midwestern United States.

SAMPLE

30 adults undergoing OA treatment.

METHODS

Five phone interviews were conducted during eight weeks. Linear mixed effects and generalized estimating equations were used to examine symptoms and interference over time.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Symptoms and comorbid conditions.

FINDINGS

The mean age of participants was 65.1 years. Fifteen participants were female, 25 were Caucasian, and 23 had comorbidities. Twenty-one patients had late-stage cancer, and rates of adherence were 90%. Fatigue, sleep disturbance, and numbness or tingling in hands and feet were highly prevalent symptoms. Younger age was associated with higher symptom severity (p < 0.01) and interference (p = 0.01). Patients with more comorbidities tended to report higher symptom severity. Simultaneous IV chemotherapy was not a predictor of symptom severity or interference over age and comorbidity. Symptoms were most frequently attributed to cancer and its treatment. Patients with a greater number of comorbidities were more likely to include comorbidities in symptom attribution and reported interference from the OA with managing comorbid conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms may be more severe in patients prescribed OAs who are younger and have comorbid conditions. More comorbidities and absence of simultaneous IV chemotherapy increased the likelihood of inclusion of chronic conditions in symptom attribution. Patients reported that OA treatment interfered with comorbidity management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses need to take comorbidities into account when caring for patients prescribed OAs because the chronic conditions may influence symptom severity and the ability to manage symptoms.

Adherence to capecitabine treatment and contributing factors among cancer patients in Malaysia

Ensuring adherence to chemotherapy is important to prevent disease progression, prolong survival and sustain good quality of life. Capecitabine is a complex chemotherapeutic agent with many side effects that might affect patient adherence to treatment. This cross sectional study aimed to determine adherence to capecitabine and its contributing factors among cancer outpatients in Malaysia. One hundred and thirteen patients on single regime capecitabine were recruited from Hospital Sultan Ismail and Hospital Kuala Lumpur from October 2013 to March 2014. Adherence was determined based on adherence score using validated Medication Compliance Questionnaire. Patient socio-demographics, disease, and treatment characteristics were obtained from medical records. Satisfaction score was measured using the validated Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare questionnaire. The mean adherence score was 96.1% (standard deviation: 3.29%). The significant contributing factors of adherence to capecitabine were Malay ethnicity [β=1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21, 2.43; p value=0.020], being female [β=1.8; 95%CI: 0.61, 2.99; p value=0.003]), satisfaction score [β=0.08; 95%CI: 0.06, 1.46; p value=0.035], presence of nausea or vomiting [β=2.3; 95%CI: 1.12, 3.48; p value <0.001] and other side effects [β=1.45; 95%CI: 0.24, 2.65; p value=0.019]. Adherence to capecitabine was generally high in our local population. Attention should be given to non-Malay males and patients having nausea, vomiting or other side effects. Sufficient information, proactive assessment and appropriate management of side effects would improve patient satisfaction and thus create motivation to adhere to treatment plans.

Inner conflict in patients receiving oral anticancer agents: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the experiences of patients receiving oral anticancer agents.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using semistructured interviews with a grounded theory approach.

SETTING

A university hospital in Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

14 patients with gastric cancer who managed their cancer with oral anticancer agents.

RESULTS

Patients with cancer experienced inner conflict between rational belief and emotional resistance to taking medication due to confrontation with cancer, doubt regarding efficacy and concerns over potential harm attached to use of the agent. Although they perceived themselves as being adherent to medication, they reported partial non-adherent behaviours. The patients reassessed their lives through the experience of inner conflict and, ultimately, they recognised their role in medication therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancer experienced inner conflict, in which considerable emotional resistance to taking their medication affected their occasional non-adherent behaviours. In patient-centred care, it is imperative that healthcare providers understand patients' inner conflict and inconsistency between their subjective view and behaviour to support patient adherence.

Issues related to overadherence to oral chemotherapy or targeted agents

Use of oral chemotherapy or targeted agents is shifting how cancer treatment is administered, moving it from supervised office visits to self-administration at home. This study examines issues related to overadherence to oral agents that were noted during a trial conducted by the authors comparing an automated voice system to strategies to reduce symptom severity and improve adherence. Overadherence to oral agents may be a significant clinical problem, occurring more often in patients with complex dosing regimens, and may lead to increased symptom severity from side effects of treatment. Avoiding overadherence may be important for the reduction or prevention of symptoms and potentially life-threatening toxicity. Nurses need to discuss with their patients the importance of the timing of the administration of their oral oncolytic regimen, as well as to provide prompts to assist in self-administration as prescribed so that overadherence can be avoided.

Treatment preference, adherence and outcomes in patients with cancer: literature review and development of a theoretical model

OBJECTIVE

A patient's preference may guide their behavior and influence their willingness to take medication or undergo treatment affecting outcomes, such as health-related quality of life, or survival. The importance of understanding patient preferences within oncology is unclear and few adherence studies exist compared with other therapeutic areas.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study was designed to review the literature regarding patient preferences, adherence and their link to outcomes specifically in the oncology setting and to propose a theoretical model. An in-depth review was conducted, using Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases to search for published data examining patient preference, adherence and oncology-specific outcomes, from 1982-2012. Articles were reviewed independently by two authors and rated for relevance and quality. Information from high-quality articles and discussion with oncology and patient preference experts were used to identify associations between important individual concepts as a basis for a theoretical model.

RESULTS

In total, 1362 abstracts were identified. After removal of duplicates and initial review, 1269 were excluded and 93 reviewed in detail. Of these publications, 18 were deemed 'high-quality' and used to develop the final model. Variables associated with patient preference, adherence and outcome were identified. External variables included communication, treatment and mode of administration; patient beliefs and values were identified as cognitive variables; and adherence was attributed as a behavioral variable. Relationships between patient preference, adherence and clinical outcomes were established. Adverse events had a strong relationship with adherence; patient beliefs and values were identified as having a moderating effect on adherence. Adherence behavior had a direct relationship to outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving our understanding of patient preference may improve clinical outcomes in oncology patients. Although the proposed theoretical model is limited, it provides a basis to develop testable hypotheses for the relationships between patient preference, adherence and outcomes specific to oncology.

Interventions for adherence with oral chemotherapy in hematological malignancies: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence to treatment for chronic diseases including some hematological malignancies impedes health outcomes and increases costs. Oral chemotherapy is an emerging trend that raises concern about nonadherence problems in these targeted patients.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic literature review explores evidence and gaps in the literature regarding interventions to enhance adherence with prescribed oral chemotherapy in patients with hematological malignancies.

METHODS

Searches of databases and abstracts from conferences were performed for 1987 to January 2013 using a modified Cochrane method. Studies measuring interventions to improve adherence alone or together with clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes were included. Assessment of methodological quality was performed for each retained study.

RESULTS

The literature search generated 6 studies that met inclusion criteria. Four of these reported a statistically significant increase in the adherence outcome, compared with baseline. Tailored and educational interventions were widely used among the retained studies. Post-intervention adherence rates were 41-96.1%; intervention groups yielded higher rates than comparison groups. Two studies reported statistically significant improvement in clinical outcomes (cytogenetic response and survival time). One study reported that severity of illness was associated with survival time but not with adherence. Studies that used both tailored and educational interventions showed significant relationship between adherence and clinical outcomes; however, the study that used dosage simplification did not. None of the studies explored humanistic or economic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to improve adherence with oral chemotherapies in hematological malignancies remain limited. Though they were heterogeneous in nature, interventions tested in the retained studies suggested a positive impact on the adherence outcome; some established a significant relationship between adherence and clinical outcomes. The results yielded limited evidences regarding characteristics of a specific intervention, but supported a general structure for methods to improve adherence and other outcomes in real-life settings. Further rigorous methodological studies are needed to fully examine impact on adherence and clinical outcomes.

Patient adherence with oral oncolytic therapies

OBJECTIVES

The use of oral chemotherapy has increased substantially. This adds a level of complexity beyond that of traditional intravenous chemotherapy. This article discusses challenges and strategies to meet patient needs.

DATA SOURCES

Research and peer-reviewed journal articles.

CONCLUSION

Adherence is a challenge for oral chemotherapy. A systematic approach serves as the best way to facilitate a comprehensive oral chemotherapy plan.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses' knowledge is required to support and monitor patient adherence. Nurses must master effective utilization of resources to monitor and positively impact successful patient outcomes.

Factors influencing adherence to cancer treatment in older adults with cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a disease that mostly affects older adults. Treatment adherence is crucial to obtain optimal outcomes such as cure or improvement in quality of life. Older adults have numerous comorbidites as well as cognitive and sensory impairments that may affect adherence. The aim of this systematic review was to examine factors that influence adherence to cancer treatment in older adults with cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Systematic review of the literature published between inception of the databases and February 2013. English, Dutch, French and German-language articles reporting cross-sectional or longitudinal, intervention or observational studies of cancer treatment adherence were included. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Web of Science, ASSIA, Ageline, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), SocAbstracts and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers reviewed abstracts and abstracted data using standardized forms. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2011.

RESULTS

Twenty-two manuscripts were identified reporting on 18 unique studies. The quality of most studies was good. Most studies focused on women with breast cancer and adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy. More than half of the studies used data from administrative or clinical databases or chart reviews. The adherence rate varied from 52% to 100%. Only one qualitative study asked older adults about reasons for non-adherence. Factors associated with non-adherence varied widely across studies.

CONCLUSION

Non-adherence was common across studies but little is known about the factors influencing non-adherence. More research is needed to investigate why older adults choose to adhere or not adhere to their treatment regimens taking into account their multimorbidity.

An intervention to improve adherence and management of symptoms for patients prescribed oral chemotherapy agents: an exploratory study

BACKGROUND

Use of oral chemotherapy agents to treat cancer has increased. Patients are responsible for adhering to complex regimens while managing symptoms from adverse effects of the chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined an intervention to manage symptoms and adherence to oral agents.

METHODS

A 3-group pilot study determined how an Automated Voice Response (AVR) system alone (n = 40), or the AVR with strategies to manage symptoms and adherence (n = 40), or the AVR with strategies to manage adherence (n = 39) reduced symptom severity and improved adherence. Participants received a Symptom Management Toolkit, completed a baseline interview, and were randomized to receive 8 weekly AVR calls. An exit interview occurred at 10 weeks.

RESULTS

Mean age was 59.6 years, with 70% female and 76% white, and 42% were nonadherent, with missed doses increasing with regimen complexity. Symptom severity declined over time in all groups. No difference was found in adherence rates, and higher adherence was related with lower symptom severity across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence, a significant clinical problem, can affect efficacy of the cancer treatment. The AVR intervention alone was just as effective as the AVR plus the nurse intervention at promoting adherence and managing symptoms from adverse effects.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses need to focus on patient education by ensuring patient understanding of oral agent regimen and the need to adhere to the oral agent for efficacious cancer treatment. Nurses can promote the use of medication reminders and self-management of symptoms from adverse effects, to support adherence to the oral agent.

Are community pharmacists equipped to ensure the safe use of oral anticancer therapy in the community setting? Results of a cross-country survey of community pharmacists in Canada

Purpose

Oral anticancer agents offer significant benefits over parenteral anticancer therapy in terms of patient convenience and reduced intrusiveness. Oral anticancer agents give many cancer patients freedom from numerous hospital visits, allowing them to obtain their medications from their local community pharmacy. However, a major concern with increased use of oral anticancer agents is shift of responsibility in ensuring the proper use of anticancer agents from the hospital/clinical oncology team to the patient/caregiver and other healthcare providers such as the community pharmacists who may not be appropriately trained for this. This study assessed the readiness of community pharmacists across Canada to play this increased role with respect to oral anticancer agents.

Methods

Using a structured electronic mailing strategy, a standardized survey was mailed to practicing pharmacists in five provinces where community pharmacists were dispensing the majority of oral anticancer agents. In addition to collecting basic demographic and their practice setting, the survey assessed the pharmacists’ knowledge regarding cancer therapy and oral anticancer agents in particular, their education needs and access to resources on oral anticancer agents, the quality of prescriptions for oral anticancer agents received by them in terms of the required elements, their role in patient education, and steps to enhance patient and personal safety.

Results

There were 352 responses to the survey. Only 13.6% of respondents felt that they had received adequate oncology education at the undergraduate level and approximately 19% had attended a continuing education event related to oncology in the past 2 years. Only 24% of the pharmacists who responded were familiar with the common doses of oral anticancer agents and only 9% felt comfortable educating patients on these medications.

Conclusions

A substantial portion of community pharmacists in Canada lack a solid understanding of oral anticancer agents and thus are poorly equipped to play a major role in ensuring their appropriate use. More education and training on oral anticancer agents are urgently required.

Adherence management for patients with cancer taking capecitabine: a prospective two-arm cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate a multiprofessional modular medication management to assure adherence to capecitabine.

METHODS

The study was conducted as a prospective, multicentred observational cohort study. All participants received pharmaceutical care consisting of oral and written information. Daily adherence was defined as percentage of days with correctly administered capecitabine doses and assessed using medication event monitoring. According to their daily adherence during the first cycle, patients were identified as initially non-adherent (<90% adherence) or adherent (≥90% adherence). Initially non-adherent patients received additional adherence support.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients with various tumour entities were enrolled, 58 were initially adherent and 15 non-adherent. Median daily adherence of initially non-adherent patients increased from 85.7% to 97.6% during the observation period of six cycles. Throughout all cycles, median daily adherence of initially adherent patients was 100.0%. Daily adherence was not associated with sociodemographic and disease-related factors. No patient was non-persistent.

CONCLUSIONS

An early adherence screening effectively distinguishes between patients adhering and non-adhering to capecitabine. The provision of specific adherence support is associated with enhanced adherence of initially non-adherent patients, whereas initially adherent patients remain adherent for at least six cycles without specific support. Our needs-based approach helps to use available resources for adherence management efficiently.