A comparison of growth among growth-friendly systems for scoliosis: a systematic review

Breaking the "law of diminishing returns" with novel, staged, unilateral magnetically controlled growing rods to guided growth surgery for severe, progressive infantile scoliosis

PURPOSE

Infantile scoliosis presents a significant challenge due to high risk of pulmonary complications and morbidity. While dual growing rod constructs are often utilized, they are not always feasible in a young patient with a severe curve. In this study, we present a series of eight patients treated with a unilateral magnetically controlled growing rod (uMCGR) construct later converted to guided growth surgery (GGS).

METHODS

A multicenter database was queried for patients with progressive infantile scoliosis treated with uMCGR before later conversion to GGS. A minimum of 2 year follow-up was required for inclusion. Curve magnitude, trunk growth, revisions, and complications were tracked at all time points.

RESULTS

Eight patients were included in the study. Mean age at index surgery was 4.1 years, while conversion to GGS occurred at average 7.9 years and final follow-up was at 10.5 years of age. At index procedure, major curve averaged 77.1°, which improved to 45.4°. Major curve increased to 48.4° prior to conversion, then improved to 30.9°. Major curve averaged 36.8° at final follow-up, for a maintained curve correction of 52.3%. T1-12 height and T1-S1 height averaged 15.4 and 21.5 cm at index procedure and increased to 20.6 and 32.7 cm at final follow-up. Nine revisions were performed in 6 patients, and no patient showed evidence of premature fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of severe progression infantile scoliosis with this staged protocol provided excellent curve correction with continued trunk growth through treatment, without evidence of the "Law of Diminishing Returns".

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis

Despite many surgical advances in the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) over the past two decades, this condition remains a challenge to address. While otherwise healthy children can have EOS, many of these patients have complicated comorbidities making proper treatment algorithms extraordinarily difficult. Non-operative measures can be successful when initiated early, but are many times utilized as a delay tactic until growth-friendly operative procedures can be safely performed. This article will summarize the current concepts in the treatment of EOS with a focus on the surgical advances that have recently been made.

Complications and Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Various Etiologies of Early-Onset Scoliosis Treated with Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods-A Multicenter Study

Background: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) refers to spinal deformities that develop and are diagnosed before the age of 10. The most important goals of the surgical treatment of EOS are to stop the progression of curvature, achieve the best possible correction, preserve motion, and facilitate spinal growth. The objectives of this multicenter study were to analyze the risk of complications among patients with EOS treated using magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) and assess the patients' and their parents' quality of life after diagnosis and treatment with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: Patients given an ineffective nonoperative treatment qualified for surgery with MCGRs. This study involved 161 patients (90 females and 71 males) who were classified according to the etiology of curvature. The intraoperative and postoperative complications and those that occurred during the continuation of treatment with MCGRs were recorded and analyzed. The 24-item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) was used to evaluate the patients' quality of life and satisfaction with the treatment. Results: Implant-related complications requiring instrumentation revision were recorded in 26% of the patients. Medical complications occurred in 45% of the population. The EOSQ-24 revealed a significant improvement in the average scores during the follow-up. Conclusions: The treatment of early-onset scoliosis with MCGRs carries 66% risks of incurring medical and mechanical complications, the latter 26% of patients requiring revision procedures. Children with neuromuscular scoliosis, females, and with curvature greater than 90 degrees are at a higher risk of developing complications. Limiting the number of elective surgeries necessitated to prolong the instrumentation and treatment process for patients with MCGRs can greatly enhance their quality of life and satisfaction throughout the follow-up period.

Evaluation of crankshaft phenomenon after posterior fusion for early onset scoliosis using an inverse trigonometric function: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The crankshaft phenomenon (CSP) is a corrective loss after posterior surgery for early onset scoliosis (EOS). However, an accurate method for CSP evaluation has yet to be developed. In this study, we evaluated pedicle screw (PS) length and rotation angle using an inverse trigonometric function and investigated the prevalence of the CSP.

METHODS

Fifty patients from nine institutions (mean age 10.6 years, male/female ratio 4:46) who underwent early definitive fusion surgery at ≤ 11 years of age were included. The rotation angle was calculated as arctan (lateral/frontal PS length) using radiography. Measurements were taken at the apex and lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) immediate, 2-, and 5-year postoperatively. CSP was defined as a rotation angle progression ≥ 5°. We divided patients into CSP and non-CSP groups and measured the demographic parameters, Risser grade, state of the triradiate cartilage, major coronal Cobb angle, T1-T12 length, T1-S1 length, and presence of distal adding-on (DAO). We compared these variables between groups and investigated the correlation between the measured variables and vertebral rotation. Logistic regression analysis investigated factors associated with CSP.

RESULTS

The rotation angle progressed by 2.4 and 1.3° over 5 years for the apex and LIV, respectively. CSP occurred in 15 cases (30%), DAO in 11 cases (22%), and CSP and DAO overlapped in 4 cases (8%). In the CSP group, the T1-T12 length was low immediate postoperatively. The rotation angle was negatively correlated with preoperative height (r = - 0.33), T1-T12 length (r = - 0.35), and T1-S1 length (r = - 0.30). A lower preoperative T1-T12 length was associated with CSP (odds ratio: 0.996, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

CSP occurred in 30% of patients with EOS who underwent definitive fusion. The presence of CSP was associated with a lower preoperative T1-T12 length.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnosis, level IV.

Comment on Grabala et al. Radiological Outcomes of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Treatment of Children with Various Etiologies of Early-Onset Scoliosis-A Multicenter Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1529

We read with great interest the study titled "Radiological Outcomes of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Treatment of Children with Various Etiologies of Early-Onset Scoliosis-A Multicenter Study" by Grabala and colleagues [...].

Orthopedic mechanism analysis of growing rod distraction for early-onset scoliosis based on 3D morphological parameters

Traditional growing rod (TGR) provides a corrective moment for deformed segments to straighten the spine, whose clinical efficacy has proven positive and growth-friendly. However, an insufficient understanding of orthopedic mechanisms can affect the development of clinical strategies. This research attempts to analyze the spine that has undergone four distraction operations: exploring the spinal orthopedic mechanism, including alignment, growth, and morphology. In this study, the spinal morphology curves were illustrated in three human planes to exhibit the changes in spinal alignment. The spinal growth characteristics were measured to discuss the unsynchronized and diminishing growth rate. The spinal deformations were evaluated to indicate asymmetric growth. As a result, the spinal alignment changes indicated the orthopedic process improved, but the re-unbalance occurred after multiple distractions. Then, unsynchronized growth existed in the superior and inferior segments, and the growth rate over every distraction diminished. Finally, asymmetric growth was indicated as the axial/circumferential growth ratio getting greater and the cuneate level approaching normal. Accordingly, a TGR is growth-friendly, but combining the osteotomy fusion of lumbar segments for severe early-onset scoliosis may be an excellent choice to solve the insufficient corrective stimulation. Regarding the distraction process, reshaping before the final fusion can fix the balance loss, and a prolonged distraction frequency fits the law of diminishing return. In conclusion, studying orthopedic mechanisms based on morphological measurement can guide clinical strategy optimization.

Safety and efficacy of growth-friendly instrumentation for early-onset scoliosis in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1 in the disease-modifying treatment era

Purpose

To evaluate the safety of growth-friendly instrumentation for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 who received disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and analyze short-term efficacy.

Methods

Retrospective search was conducted between 2017 and 2023. Patients with genetically confirmed SMA type 1 who were surgically treated for spinal deformity and receiving DMTs (nusinersen, risdiplam, or onasemnogene abeparvovec) were included. SMA types 2 and 3 and patients who do not receive DMTs were excluded. Clinical and radiographic data were collected at preoperative, postoperative, and latest follow-up visits.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (mean follow-up: 16 months (range 2-41)) were included. The mean age at surgery was 60 months (range 29-96). Fifteen were treated with dual magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), four with unilateral MCGR and a contralateral guided growth system, three with Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR®) implants, five with self-distracting systems, and one with traditional dual growing rods. The mean amount of correction was 57% (44°± 17) for scoliosis and 83% (13°± 11) for pelvic obliquity. The mean T1-12 height gain during surgery was 31 mm (±16 mm), while the mean T1 S1 height gain was 51 mm (±24 mm), and instrumented growth was observed during follow-up. Five patients (18%) developed six serious adverse events: three surgical site infections, two anchor failures, and one rod fracture, and all required unplanned reoperations. No neurologic complication, difficulty during nusinersen injections, or respiratory decline was recorded.

Conclusion

We report that spinal deformity in this population can be safely treated with growth-friendly instrumentation, with similar complication rates when compared with SMA type 2.

Growth friendly surgeries increase 3D true spine length at two-years post-operative

PURPOSE

Traditional coronal-plane vertical spine height measurements, such as T1-T12 and T1-S1 spine height, are influenced by 3-dimensional spinal deformity. Therefore, they are unreliable indicators of true spine growth. The novel 3D true spine length (3D-TSL) technique assesses spine growth regardless of the presence of 3D spinal deformity. This study evaluates the effect of growth friendly surgery on spine growth using the 3D-TSL technique at two years follow-up.

METHODS

Radiographs of early onset scoliosis (EOS) participants undergoing growth friendly surgery at a single institution were evaluated at pre-index, post-index, and at 2-year follow-up. Scoliosis, kyphosis, traditional coronal height and 3D-TSL were measured.

RESULTS

Twenty-four EOS patients (14 female) with a mean age of 6.3 years were included. Scoliosis improved from 77.8 ± 18.7° pre-index to 56.0 ± 17.8° post-index (p < 0.001); but increased at 2 years to 65.9 ± 20.1° (p < 0.05). Kyphosis improved from 56.0 ± 20.7° pre-index to 39.3 ± 13.8° post-index (p < 0.001); and increased again at 2 years to 48.6 ± 16.4° (p < 0.05). Traditional T1-S1 height increased from pre-index to post-index, to 2-year follow-up (245.5 ± 37.2 mm to 275.8 ± 42.7 mm; p < 0.001, to 288.0 ± 41.7 mm; p = 0.005). As expected, T1-S1 3D-TSL did not change from pre to immediately post-index (305.6 ± 43.9 mm vs 306.5 ± 44.0 mm); there was a significant change from post-index to 2-year follow-up (334.1 ± 48.0 mm; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Out of plane changes in scoliosis and kyphosis over time justify the use of the 3D-TSL for this cohort of patients. There was no significant change in 3D-TSL from pre-index to post-operatively; however, during the growth phase of treatment 3D-TSL increased significantly by 27.6 mm.

Surgical treatment of neuromuscular Early Onset Scoliosis with a bilateral posterior one-way rod compared to the Spring Distraction System: study protocol for a limited-efficacy Randomized Controlled Trial (BiPOWR)

BACKGROUND

Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) is a progressive spinal deformity in children, and a potentially life-threatening disease. "Growth-friendly" surgical techniques aim to control the deformity, while allowing the spine and trunk to maintain growth. Current "growth-friendly" systems such as the traditional growing rod (TGR) and magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) have limitations that reduce their efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Recently, two "growth-friendly" systems have been developed that mitigate many of these limitations, the Spring Distraction System (SDS) and the One Way Self-Expanding Rod (OWSER). The purpose of the multicenter BiPOWR trial is to investigate, describe and compare the 1-year limited-efficacy and -safety of both strategies in the treatment of neuromuscular EOS.

METHODS

After informed consent, 28 neuromuscular EOS patients will be randomized to receive either the SDS or the OWSER. Patients and caregivers will be blinded to allocation until after surgery. Primary outcomes will be maintenance of coronal curve correction and the occurrence of serious adverse events. In addition, spinal growth, implant lengthening, and perioperative findings are recorded systematically. At each follow-up moment, the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) will be used to assess health-related quality of life. All outcomes will be compared between groups.

DISCUSSION

The BiPOWR trial is the first randomized controlled trial that compares two specific "growth-friendly" implants in a specified EOS population. It will determine the 1-year limited-efficacy and safety of the SDS and OWSER implants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04021784 (13-06-2019). CCMO registry: NL64018.041.17 (06-05-2019).

Use of intra-operative internal distraction for the application of magnetically controlled growth rods (MCGR): a technique for maximizing correction in the rigid immature spine during index surgery

OBJECTIVE

Operative treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) with Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) in moderate-to-severe curves poses a challenge due to the limited amount of force and length available with the implant. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of the intra-operative internal spine distraction using Harrington Outrigger, before definitive implantation of MCGR, with regard to initial correction, maintenance of correction, truncal balance, and complication rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

16 EOS patients treated with the application of MCGR using the intra-operative internal distractor technique were included in the study. More than 50% of cases were congenital scoliosis with multiple vertebral anomalies. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Radiological measurement of change in Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, T1-S1 length, T1-T12l length, and sagittal balance were done at pre-op, immediate post-op, after 1 year, and 2 years. All the complications were noted and documented.

RESULTS

The mean age of the operated patients was 8 ± 1.7 years, range (4-10 years). Mean pre-operative Cobb angle was 70.4 degrees. The mean correction of major Cobb angle was 34.6°. The percentage correction achieved in post-operative Cobb angle was about 51%. Mean change in post-operative thoracic kyphosis was 18.5° (40%). The average gain in immediate post-operative spinal length (T1-S1) and thoracic height (T1-T12) was 46.7 mm (18.3%) and 41 mm (23%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Large and rigid curves in EOS can achieve a significant correction of Cobb angle and coronal imbalance during the index operation, by the use of intra-operative internal distraction at the time of MCGR insertion.

LEVEL AND TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective clinical study, level 4.

Is Final Fusion Necessary for Growing-Rod Graduates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

The need for definitive fusion for growing rod graduates is a controversial topic in the management of Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the available literature to evaluate the outcomes of growing rod graduates undergoing final fusion or observation with implants in-situ.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was carried out aimed at identifying articles reporting outcomes in growing rod graduates. Apart from the study characteristics and demographic details, the extracted data included Cobb's correction, trunk height parameters, and revision rate. The extracted data was analyzed and forest plots were generated to draw comparisons between the observation and fusion groups.

RESULTS

Of the 11 included studies, 6 were case-control and 5 were case series. The authors did not find any significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to the pre-index and final Cobb's correction, T1-T12 or T1-S1 height gain in either over-all, or sub-analysis with case-control studies. The meta-analysis showed a significantly higher revision rate in patients undergoing a definitive fusion procedure.

CONCLUSION

The current analysis revealed comparable outcomes in terms of correction rate and gain in the trunk height but a lesser need of revisions in observation sub-group. The lack of good quality evidence and the need for prospective and randomized trials was also propounded by this review.

The Effect of Concave-Side Intertransverse Ligament Laxity on the Stress of AIS Lumbar Spine Based on Finite Element Method

(1) Background: Scoliosis has the mechanical characteristic of asymmetric stress distribution, which is one of the reasons for the aggravation of scoliosis. Bracing therapy is the best treatment for AIS, but it is difficult and costly to operate. Is it possible to reduce pressure in the concave side by relaxing the ITL in the concave side of scoliosis, so as to improve the abnormal stress distribution of scoliosis? In this paper, a finite element method was used to simulate the effect of the relaxation of concave-side ITL on the stress of a lumbar spine with scoliosis, which provides some guidance for the treatment of scoliosis. (2) Methods: Using CT images of a patient with scoliosis whose Cobb Angle was 43° and Lordosis Angle was 45, a scoliosis lumbar was established, and Young's modulus of the ITL of the concave-side lumbar spine was reduced by 95% to simulate ligament relaxation. By comparing the stress condition of the model vertebral body with no ligament relaxation, the effect of concave-side ITL relaxation on the mechanical characteristics of scoliosis lumbar spine was explored. (3) Results: An effective and complete model of the lumbar spine was established. The concave ITL relaxed, which only had a great impact on the bending loads. After the ligament was relaxed, the stability of the spine was reduced. Stress concentration on the concave side of vertebrae and the IVD was aggravated. Under loads on the convex side, the maximum stress on the vertebral body and the IVD increased significantly, making lumbar vertebrae more vulnerable to injury. (4) Conclusions: Laxity of the ITL on the concave side of the AIS lumbar only affects the bending load. Laxity of the concave-side ligament will reduce the stability of the lumbar, aggravate the uneven stress distribution of scoliotic lumbar vertebrae, increase the risk of IVD injury, and be unfavorable for the scoliotic lumbar spine. Relaxation of the concave ITL alone is not an effective way to treat scoliosis.

A Modified Self-Growing Rod Technique for Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis

Surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) remains challenging as no definitive surgical technique has emerged as the single best option in this varied patient population^1-3. Although the available surgical techniques may differ substantially, they all share the same goals of achieving and maintaining deformity correction, allowing physiological spinal growth, and reducing the number of operations and complications. Herein, we present a modified self-growing rod technique that represents a valid alternative to the existing surgical procedures for EOS.

Description

The patient is positioned prone on a radiolucent table, and the spine is prepared and draped in a standard fashion. A posterior midline skin incision is made from the upper to the lower instrumented level. Subperiosteal exposure of the spine is carried out, ensuring that capsules of the facet joints are spared. Pedicle screws are inserted bilaterally at the cranial and caudal ends of the instrumentation. Fixation with pedicle screws of at least 3 levels at the top and bottom end is usually advised; in nonambulatory patients with pelvic obliquity, caudal fixation can be extended to the pelvis with bilateral iliac screws. Sublaminar wires are positioned bilaterally at every level between the cranial and caudal ends of the instrumentation and are passed as medially as possible to avoid damage to the facet joints. Four 5-mm cobalt-chromium rods are cut, contoured, and inserted at each end of the construct. Ipsilateral rods are secured with use of sublaminar wires, making sure that they overlap over a sufficient length to allow for the remaining spinal growth. Correction of the deformity is achieved with use of a combination of cantilever maneuvers and apical translation by progressive and sequential tightening of the sublaminar wires. The wound is closed in layers over a subfascial drain. The patient is allowed free mobilization after surgery. No postoperative brace is required.

Alternatives

Nonoperative alternative treatment for EOS includes serial cast immobilization and bracing⁴. Alternative surgical treatments include traditional growing rods⁵, magnetically controlled growing rods⁶, the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib-expansion technique⁷, and the Shilla technique⁸. The use of compression-based systems (i.e., staples or tether)⁹ or early limited fusion has also been reported by other authors.

Rationale

The main advantage of our technique is that it relies on physiological spinal growth and does not require surgery or external devices for rod lengthening, which is particularly beneficial in frail patients with a neuromuscular disease in whom repeated surgery is not advised. Segmental fixation by sublaminar wires allows good control of the deformity apex during growth. Concerns regarding early fusion of the spine have not been confirmed in our mid-term follow-up study¹⁰.

Expected Outcomes

This technique allows correction of the deformity and continuous spinal growth in the years following surgery. At 6.0 years postoperatively, the average main curve correction was reported to be 61% and the average pelvic obliquity correction was 69%. The spine was reported to lengthen an average of 40.9 mm (range, 14.0 to 84.0 mm) immediately postoperatively, and the T1-S1 segment was reported to continue growing at 10.5 mm/year (range, 3.6 to 16.5 mm/year) thereafter¹⁰. The most common complication is rod breakage at the thoracolumbar junction, which seems to be more common in patients with idiopathic or cerebral palsy EOS and during the pubertal growth spurt¹⁰.

Important Tips

Subperiosteal exposure of the spine should be carried out, making sure to preserve facet joints in the unfused area of the spine.Achieve segmental fixation with use of sublaminar wires at every level and pedicle screws at the top and bottom ends of the instrumentation.If pelvic imbalance is present and the patient is nonambulatory, pelvic fixation with iliac screws is advised.First round correction of the deformity is achieved with a cantilever technique; correction fine-tuning can be performed by tightening sublaminar wires.Consider utilizing thicker rods in cases of idiopathic or cerebral palsy EOS.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

EOS = early-onset scoliosisAP = anteroposteriorEV = end vertebraSSEP = somatosensory evoked potentialsMEP = motor evoked potentialsPJK = proximal junctional kyphosisSMA = spinal muscular atrophyCP = cerebral palsyPACU = post-anesthesia care unit.

The Effect of Apical Vertebra Position on Growing Rod Treatment: A Clinical and Finite Element Study

BACKGROUND

Growing rods (GRs) is a commonly utilized technique for the management of early-onset scoliosis. The significance of the position of the apical vertebrae relative to the rods is not known. The purpose of this study is to analyze the potential effects of the position of the apical vertebrae in relation to the GRs on deformity control through plain radiographs and finite element analysis (FEA) modeling.

METHODS

We identified 140 patients treated with GR between 2000 and 2018. Patients who had a congenital vertebral anomaly or <2-year follow-up were excluded. Curve magnitude, traction radiograph under general anesthesia (TRUGA) flexibility, apical rotation, the lengths of T1-12, T1-S1, and the instrumented segments were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the apical position on the postoperative radiographs: group 1 (both pedicles are between the rods), group 2 (convex rod is between the apical vertebra pedicles), group 3 (both pedicles are lateral to the convex rod). FEA models were created simulating the 3 groups. Both radiographic and FEA data were analyzed to compare the deformity control and growth in each group.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were included in the final analyses (mean age 84 mo; range: 38 to 148). Ten patients (17%) were in group 1, 34 (59%) in group 2, and 14 (24%) in group 3. Difference between TRUGA flexibilities was statistically insignificant. Group 3 was the least successful in terms of both height gain and rotational control. FEA showed a decrease in rotation and displacement for every group, however, the residual rotation and displacement was highest in group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Bringing the apex in line with the GR increases the capacity of growth preservation as it results in largest height gain and better deformity control. FEA model demonstrated that distraction alone is inadequate for controlling rotation, and with increasing apical translation, residual rotation after distraction also increases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Spring Distraction System for Growth-Friendly Surgical Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis: A Preliminary Report on Clinical Results and Safety after Design Iterations in a Prospective Clinical Trial

Background: The Spring Distraction System (SDS) is a dynamic growth-friendly implant to treat early onset scoliosis (EOS). Previous SDS studies showed promising results in terms of curve correction and complication profile. Nevertheless, complications did occur, which led to modifications in the implant design. The main iterations were a larger rod diameter and a more sagittal stable sliding mechanism. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of these iterations. Methods: All patients treated with the modified SDS and >1 year follow-up were included. Radiographic outcomes, severe adverse events (SAEs), unplanned returns to the operating room (UPRORs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were investigated. Results: Seventeen EOS patients (three congenital, four idiopathic, nine neuromuscular, one syndromic) were included. Mean age at surgery was 9.5 ± 2.5 years. Similar to the first generation SDS, about 50% initial correction was achieved and maintained, and spinal growth was near physiological. Most importantly, SAEs and UPRORs were diminished and favorable with 0.10/patient/year. In addition, HRQoL increased during the first year postoperatively, indicating the implant was well accepted. Conclusion: These preliminary results indicate that the iterations of the SDS are effective in terms of reducing SAEs and UPRORs and increasing HRQoL in patients with EOS.

Finite Element Comparison of the Spring Distraction System and the Traditional Growing Rod for the Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Finite element analysis (FEA).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine biomechanical differences between traditional growing rod (TGR) and spring distraction system (SDS) treatment of early-onset scoliosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many "growth-friendly" implants like the TGR show high rates of implant failure, spinal stiffening, and intervertebral disc (IVD) height loss. We developed the SDS, which employs continuous, dynamic forces to mitigate these limitations. The present FEA compares TGR and SDS implantation, followed by an 18-month growth period.

METHODS

Two representative, ligamentous, scoliotic FEA models were created for this study; one representing TGR and one representing SDS. initial implantation, and up to 18 months of physeal spinal growth were simulated. The SDS model was continuously distracted over this period; the TGR model included two additional distractions following index surgery. Outcomes included differences in rod stress, spinal morphology and iVD stress-shielding.

RESULTS

Maximum postoperative von Mises stress was 249MPa for SDS, and 205MPa for TGR. During the 6-month TGR distraction, TGR rod stress increased over two-fold to a maximum stress of 417MPa, compared to a maximum of 262 MPa in the SDS model at 6-month follow-up. During subsequent follow-up periods, TGR rod stress remained consistently higher than stresses in the SDS model. Additional lengthenings in the TGR model led to a smaller residual curve (16.08) and higher T1-S1 growth (359 mm) at 18-month follow-up compared to the SDS model (26.98, 348 mm). During follow-up, there was less stress-shielding of the IVDs in the SDS model, compared to the TGR model. At 18-month follow-up, upper and lower IVD surfaces of the SDS model were loaded more in compression than their TGR counterparts (mean upper: +112 ± 19N; mean lower: +100 ± 17N).

CONCLUSION

In the present FEA, TGR treatment resulted in slightly larger curve correction compared to SDS, at the expense of increased IVD stress-shielding and a higher risk of rod fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Early outcomes of growth friendly instrumentation in children with Williams syndrome

PURPOSE

Although scoliosis and kyphosis have been associated with Williams Syndrome (WS), no previous literature has reported on surgical treatment for early onset scoliosis (EOS) in WS. The aim of this case series is to report on the outcomes of spine deformity surgery in patients with EOS and WS and any perioperative anesthetic or cardiovascular complications.

METHODS

One multicenter database was queried for all patients with WS who underwent growth-friendly (GF) treatment before age 12 between 2000 and 2017. Demographics, surgical, and growth-friendly data were queried. Radiographs were measured for curve magnitude, T1-T12 length, and T1-S1 length.

RESULTS

Seven patients were analyzed (3 males, 4 females). Patients were at a median age of 2.8 years at initial surgery with median follow-up 3.6 years (range 2.0-12 years) after index surgery. The initial surgical treatments were as follows: 2 traditional growing rods (TGR), 2 magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and 3 vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTR). The median duration of growth-friendly treatment was 5.0 years (range, 2.6-10.4 years) with a median number of 9 device lengthenings. The median improvement in coronal curve magnitude from preoperative to most recent follow-up was 19° (range, 54°-9°). Three patients have completed GF treatment: one underwent definitive fusion, and two are under observation with apparent spontaneous fusion and retain the original GF implants. No peri-operative anesthetic or cardiovascular complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies have reported on surgical outcomes in WS patients with EOS. In this case series, 6/7 patients experienced curve improvement with growth-friendly spine instrumentation. This study suggests that growth-friendly instrumentation for severe EOS in WS can be used for control of spinal deformity while allowing for further growth. Associated complications were typical of distraction-based EOS surgical treatment. There were 62 total procedures with general anesthesia, but no perioperative cardiac complications occurred.

Disc and Vertebral Body Morphology From Birth to Adulthood

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the morphology of intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies during growth in asymptomatic children and adolescents.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Earlier studies demonstrated that spinal growth occurs predominantly in vertebral bodies. This axiom introduced a vertebral-body-focus for unravelling etiological questions and achieve growth-modulation in young spinal deformity patients. Recent studies show the importance of the intervertebral discs in the early phases and possible etiology of pediatric spinal deformities. There is presently a paucity of 3D morphometric data of spinal elements during growth.

METHODS

A database of 298 patients aged 0 to 21 that have received a computed tomography scan for indications not related to the spine was analyzed. Custom made software was used to semi-automatically measure intervertebral disc and vertebral body morphology, corrected for orientation in all 3 planes.

RESULTS

Vertebral body height increased from birth up to adulthood, from 4-to-14 mm in the cervical, 6 to 20 mm in the thoracic, and 9 to 28 mm in the lumbar spine. This increase was 0.70 mm/year in males, more pronounced than females with 0.62 mm/year (P = 0.001). Lumbar discs increased throughout growth from 4.4 to 9.0 mm, whereas thoracic discs only increased from 3.5 to 4.9 mm at age 4 and remained stable afterwards, similarly for cervical discs. The disc transverse surface area increased greatly and consistently throughout growth. Disc slenderness was stable in the lumbar spine during growth, but decreased in the thoracic and cervical spine. Overall, discs were more slender in females, especially around early adolescence.

CONCLUSION

The spine grows predominantly in the vertebral bodies. Thoracic discs increase in height only during the first years, whereas the transverse surface area continues to increase throughout growth, thus discs slenderness decreases. Relatively, female discs remained slenderer around growth-spurt. These measurements may assist future studies on the role of disc morphology in the etiology and treatment of spinal deformity.Level of Evidence: 4.

When Is a Growth-friendly Strategy Warranted? A Matched Comparison of Growing Rods Versus Primary Posterior Spinal Fusion in Juveniles With Early-onset Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

In 7 to 11-year-old juveniles with severe early-onset scoliosis (EOS) the optimal surgical option remains uncertain. This study compares growing rods (GRs) followed by definitive posterior spinal fusion (PSF) versus primary PSF in this population. We hypothesized that the thoracic height afforded by GRs would be offset by increased rigidity, more complications, and more operations.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study included EOS patients aged 7.0 to 11.9 years at index surgery treated with GR→PSF or primary PSF during 2013 to 2020. Primary outcomes were thoracic height gain (ΔT1-12H), major curve, complications, and total operations. Primary PSFs were matched with replacement 1-to-n to GR→PSFs by age at index, etiology, and major curve.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight GR→PSFs met criteria: 19 magnetically controlled GRs and 9 traditional GRs. Three magnetically controlled GRs were definitively explanted without PSF due to complications. The remaining 25 GR→PSFs were matched to 17 primary PSFs with 100% etiology match, mean Δ major curve 1 degree, and mean Δ age at index 0.5 years (PSFs older). Median ΔT1-12H pre-GR to post-PSF was 4.7 cm with median deformity correction of 37%. Median ΔT1-12H among primary PSFs was 1.9 cm with median deformity correction of 62%. GR→PSFs had mean 1.8 complications and 3.4 operations. Primary PSFs had mean 0.5 complications and 1.3 operations. Matched analysis showed adjusted mean differences of 2.3 cm greater ΔT1-12H among GR→PSFs than their matched primary PSFs, with 25% less overall coronal deformity correction, 1.2 additional complications, and 2.2 additional operations per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

In juveniles aged 7 to 11 with EOS, on average GRs afford 2 cm of thoracic height over primary PSF at the cost of poorer deformity correction and additional complications and operations. Primary PSF affords an average of 2 cm of thoracic height gain; if an additional 2 cm will be impactful then GRs should be considered. However, in most juveniles the height gained may not warrant the iatrogenic stiffness, complications, and additional operations. Surgeons and families should weigh these benefits and harms when choosing a treatment plan.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

A biomechanical study on the effect of lengthening magnitude on spine off-loading in magnetically controlled growing rod surgery: Implications on lengthening frequency

Purpose: To assess whether the magnitude of lengthening in magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) surgeries has an immediate or delayed effect on spinal off-loading. Methods: 9 whole porcine spines were instrumented using two standard MCGRs from T9 to L5. Static compression testing using a mechanical testing system (MTS) was performed at three MCGR lengthening stages (0 mm, 2 mm, and 6 mm) in each spine. At each stage, five cycles of compression at 175N with 25 min of relaxation was carried out. Off-loading was derived by comparing the load sustained by the spine with force applied by the MTS to the spine. Micro-CT imaging was subsequently performed. Results: The mean load sustained by the vertebral body before lengthening was 39.69N, and immediately after lengthening was 25.12N and 19.91N at 2 mm and 6 mm lengthening, respectively; decreasing to 10.07N, 8.31N, and 8.17N after 25 minutes of relaxation, at 0 mm, 2 mm, and 6 mm lengthening stages, respectively. There was no significant difference in off-loading between 2 mm and 6 mm lengthening stages, either instantaneously (p = 0.395) or after viscoelastic relaxation (p = 0.958). CT images showed fractures/separations at the level of pedicle screws in six spines and in the vertebral body's growth zone in five spines after 6 mm MCGR lengthening. Conclusion: This study demonstrated MCGRs cause significant off-loading of the spine leading to stress shielding. 6 mm of lengthening caused tissue damage and microfractures in some spines. There was no significant difference in spine off-loading between 2 mm and 6 mm MCGR lengthening, either immediately after lengthening or after viscoelastic relaxation.

Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods Graduation: Deformity Control with High Complication Rate

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective review of consecutive series of patients.

OBJECTIVE

Long-term experience with using the magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) to treat patients with deformity in the growing spine to the conclusion of treatment with posterior spine fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MCGR treatment for growing spine gained popularity with paucity of long-term follow up data. We hypothesized that final fusion might be more effective in bringing additional correction of the spine deformity after treatment with MCGR than that reported after traditional growing rods (TGR) due to less scarring and auto-fusion.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 47 patients with varied etiology, treated between 2011 and 2017 which graduated treatment were followed in five academic medical centers for average of 50 months (range, 10-88).

RESULTS

The initial mean coronal deformity of 69.6° (95% CI 65-74) was corrected to 40° (95% CI 36-40) immediately after the MCGR implantation but progressed to 52.8° (95% CI 46-59) prior to the final surgery (P < 0.01). Nevertheless, thoracic spine growth (T1-T12 height) improved from 187.3 mm (95% CI 179-195) following index surgery to 208.9 mm (95% CI 199-218) prior to final fusion (P < 0.01). Significant correction and spinal length were obtained at final fusion, but metallosis was a frequent observation (47%, 22/47). The average growth rate was 0.5 mm/month (95% CI 0.3-0.6). The overall complication rate within our cohort was 66% (31/47) with 45% (21/47) of unplanned returns to the operating theater. 32% (15/47) of the patients had an implant related complication. Unplanned surgery was highly correlated with thoracic kyphosis greater than 40° (OR 5.42 95% CI 1.3-23).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of growing spine deformities with MCGR provides adequate control of spine deformity it is comparable to previously published data about TGR. The overall high complications rate over time and specifically implant related complications.Level of Evidence: 4.

Clinical Outcomes of 3-column Osteotomy at Growing Rod Graduation

BACKGROUND

Several different strategies were described on how to graduate a patient when skeletal maturity is reached after growing rod treatment. A final instrumentation and fusion is commonly performed, but the stiffness of the spine after numerous lenghthenings can be a major problem. When correction is needed in a severe and rigid curve, 3-column osteotomies (3CO) can be used as a method of bringing the spine back to a well-balanced position. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of 3CO osteotomies at growing rod graduation.

METHODS

A retrospective search of the database was performed between 1996 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of early-onset scoliosis, underwent 3CO at the final fusion procedure, and ≥1 year of follow-up. Indications for this osteotomy were: significant sagittal and/or coronal off-balance or severe crankshaft deformity or significant distal and/or proximal adding-on. Clinical, radiographic, and operative data were analyzed. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink system.

RESULTS

Eight patients were included in the study with a mean age of 13.5 at graduation (male/female: 2/6). The mean scoliosis angle significantly reduced from 65.6 to 39 degrees (P=0.012). Mean T1-T12 height increased from 19 to 20.5 (P=0.084) and T1-S1 from 29.6 to 31.6 (P=0.144). Five patients had a staged surgery. Average operative time was 338 minutes and blood loss was 1321 mL. Four grade 1, 1 grade 2, and 1 grade 3 complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first case-series in the literature reporting on the use of 3CO at growing rod graduation. These procedures can be safely and effectively used to overcome significant multiplanar deformity and/or off-balance in the graduation of patients with early-onset scoliosis and significant correction can be achieved on these severe and rigid curves.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Vertebral column growth in children with early onset scoliosis treated with magnetically controlled growing rods - Effects of distraction on vertebral and disc morphology

OBJECTIVES

To report changes in vertebral and disc morphology following treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR).

METHODS

30 Patients, 21 girls and 9 boys, treated with MCGR for EOS were compared to a matched control group of 19 patients (12 girls, 7 boys) treated with bracing or observation. Age at surgery in the MCGR group was 8.75 (range: 4.6-11) years compared to 7.75 (range: 3.5-10.3) years in the control group at the time of onset of treatment. Mean follow-up was 45 (range: 24-65) months in the MCGR group vs 42 (range: 24-65) months in the control group. Calibrated radiographs were used to digitally measure disc height, vertebral body height, depth and width after surgery and at latest follow-up. Height, width and depth of lumbar and thoracic vertebrae and discs under distraction were compared to the control group and to vertebrae below instrumentation. T1-T12, T1-S1 length and Cobb angles were also measured.

RESULTS

(1) There is a significant increase of lumbar vertebral height under distraction. (2) Lumbar disc height as well as lumbar vertebral width within distraction is significantly reduced. (3) Depth of lumbar vertebrae is not significantly affected by distraction. (4) Morphology of thoracic vertebrae and adjacent discs is not significantly changed with distraction. (5) T1-T12 distance did not show any significant changes between surgical and control group, while T1-S1 growth was significantly reduced compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant changes of morphology of lumbar vertebra and discs are observed under distraction with MCGR compared to segments below instrumentation and the control group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III - retrospective comparative series.

The influence of early thoracic fusion on the pulmonary function of patients with idiopathic scoliosis in the early period of the second growth peak with different Risser signs

Background

Previous reports confirmed early spinal fusion may compromise pulmonary function and thoracic development in skeletal immature patients with scoliosis. However, the different effects in patients with various Risser signs remain unknown. This study aimed to compare the influence of early thoracic fusion on pulmonary function and thoracic growth in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) with closed triangular cartilage (TRC) and different Risser signs.

Methods

Thirty-six patients with IS and a closed TRC were retrospectively selected and divided into the low Risser (LR, Risser sign ≤2, 22 patients) and high Risser (HR, 2<Risser sign≤4, 14 patients) groups. Patient age, Risser sign, main Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, and fusion levels were recorded. Perioperative and minimum of 2-year follow-up pulmonary function and thoracic diameters were compared between both groups.

Results

There were no differences in patients’ general characteristics between two groups. The preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were 2.06±0.43 L and 2.50±0.49 L, respectively, in the LR group, and 2.31±0.49 L (p = 0.067) and 2.74±0.56 L (p = 0.122), respectively, in the HR group. While these values significantly increased postoperatively, to 2.62±0.46 L (p < 0.001) and 3.09±0.69 L (p < 0.001), in the LR group, they remained unchanged in the HR group [2.53±0.56 L (p = 0.093) and 2.70±0.98 L (p = 0.386), respectively]. The FEV1/FVC in both groups was >80% before and after surgery. The T1-T12 and anteroposterior thoracic diameter significantly increased after surgery in both groups, while the maximum inner chest diameter only increased in the LR group at the final follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in respiratory function and thoracic data between both groups.

Conclusion

For patients with IS, early fusion did not deteriorate pulmonary function or thoracic development in TRC-closed patients whose Risser sign was ≤2 compared with those with a Risser sign >2.

Growth-Friendly Spine Surgery in Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita

BACKGROUND

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) is a condition that describes neonates born with ≥2 distinct congenital contractures. Despite spinal deformity in 3% to 69% of patients, inadequate data exist on growth-friendly instrumentation (GFI) in AMC. Our study objectives were to describe current GFI trends in children with AMC and early-onset scoliosis (EOS) and to compare long-term outcomes with a matched idiopathic EOS (IEOS) cohort to determine whether spinal rigidity or extremity contractures influenced outcomes.

METHODS

Children with AMC and spinal deformity of ≥30° who were treated with GFI for ≥24 months were identified from a multicenter EOS database (1993 to 2017). Propensity scoring matched 35 patients with AMC to 112 patients with IEOS with regard to age, sex, construct, and curve. Multivariable linear mixed modeling compared changes in spinal deformity and the 24-item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) across cohorts. Cohort complications and reoperations were analyzed using multivariable Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, groups did not differ with regard to age (p = 0.87), sex (p = 0.96), construct (p = 0.62), rate of nonoperative treatment (p = 0.54), and major coronal curve magnitude (p = 0.96). After the index GFI, patients with AMC had reduced percentage of coronal correction (35% compared with 44%; p = 0.01), larger residual coronal curves (49° compared with 42°; p = 0.03), and comparable percentage of kyphosis correction (17% compared with 21%; p = 0.52). In GFI graduates (n = 81), final coronal curve magnitude (55° compared with 43°; p = 0.22) and final sagittal curve magnitude (47° compared with 47°; p = 0.45) were not significantly different at the latest follow-up after definitive surgery. The patients with AMC had reduced T1-S1 length (p < 0.001), comparable T1-S1 growth velocity (0.66 compared with 0.85 mm/month; p = 0.05), and poorer EOSQ-24 scores at the time of the latest follow-up (64 compared with 83 points; p < 0.001). After adjusting for ambulatory status and GFI duration, patients with AMC developed 51% more complications (incidence rate ratio, 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11 to 2.04]; p = 0.009) and 0.2 more complications/year (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.33 more; p = 0.03) compared with patients with IEOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AMC and EOS experienced less initial deformity correction after the index surgical procedure, but final GFI curve magnitudes and total T1-S1 growth during active treatment were statistically and clinically comparable with IEOS. Nonambulatory patients with AMC with longer GFI treatment durations developed the most complications. Multidisciplinary perioperative management is necessary to optimize GFI and to improve quality of life in this complex population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Spring distraction system for dynamic growth guidance of early onset scoliosis: two-year prospective follow-up of 24 patients

BACKGROUND

Current surgical treatment options for early onset scoliosis (EOS), with distraction- or growth-guidance implants, show limited growth and high complication rates during follow-up. We developed a novel implant concept, which uses compressed helical springs positioned around the rods of a growth-guidance construct. This spring distraction system (SDS) provides continuous corrective force to stimulate spinal growth, can be easily contoured, and can be used with all standard spinal instrumentation systems.

PURPOSE

To assess curve correction and -maintenance, spinal growth, complication rate, and health-related quality of life following SDS treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All skeletally immature EOS patients with an indication for growth-friendly surgery and without bone- or soft tissue weakness were eligible to receive SDS. For this study, all included patients with at least 2-year follow-up were analyzed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Coronal Cobb angle, sagittal parameters, T1-T12, T1-S1, and instrumented (ie, bridged segment) spinal height and freehand length, complications and re-operations, and the 24-Item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaires (EOSQ-24) score.

METHODS

All primary- and conversion patients (conversion from failed other systems) with SDS and ≥2 years follow-up were included. Radiographic parameters were compared preoperatively, postoperatively and at latest follow-up. Spinal length increase was expressed as mm/year.

RESULTS

Twenty-four skeletally immature EOS patients (18 primary and 6 conversion cases) were included. There were five idiopathic, seven congenital, three syndromic, and nine neuromuscular EOS patients. Mean age at implantation was 9.1 years (primary: 8.4; conversion: 11.2). Major curve improved from 60.3° to 35.3°, and was maintained at 40.6° at latest follow-up. Mean spring length increase during follow-up was 10.4 mm/year. T1-S1 height increased 9.9mm/year and the instrumented segment height showed a mean increase of 0.7 mm/segment/year. EOSQ-24 scores dropped after surgery from 75.6 to 67.4 but recovered to 75.0 at latest follow-up. In total, 17 reoperations were performed. Ten reoperations were performed to treat 9 implant-related complications. In addition, 7 patients showed spinal growth that exceeded expected growth velocity; their springs were retensioned during a small reoperation.

CONCLUSION

The 2-year follow-up results from this prospective cohort study indicate that the concept of spring distraction may be feasible as an alternative to current growing spine solutions. Curve correction and growth could be maintained satisfactory without the need for repetitive lengthening procedures. However, as in all growth-friendly implants, complications and reoperations could not be prevented, which emphasizes the need for further improvement.

Mid-term results of a modified self-growing rod technique for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis

AIMS

To report the mid-term results of a modified self-growing rod (SGR) technique for the treatment of idiopathic and neuromuscular early-onset scoliosis (EOS).

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis of 16 consecutive patients with EOS treated with an SGR construct at a single hospital between September 2008 and December 2014. General demographics and deformity variables (i.e. major Cobb angle, T1 to T12 length, T1 to S1 length, pelvic obliquity, shoulder obliquity, and C7 plumb line) were recorded preoperatively, and postoperatively at yearly follow-up. Complications and revision procedures were also recorded. Only patients with a minimum follow-up of five years after surgery were included.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were included. Six patients had an idiopathic EOS while ten patients had a neuromuscular or syndromic EOS (seven spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and three with cerebral palsy or a syndrome). Their mean ages at surgery were 7.1 years (SD 2.2) and 13.3 years (SD 2.6) respectively at final follow-up. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the major curve was 66.1° (SD 8.5°) and had improved to 25.5° (SD 9.9°) at final follow-up. The T1 to S1 length increased from 289.7 mm (SD 24.9) before surgery to 330.6 mm (SD 30.4) immediately after surgery. The mean T1 to S1 and T1 to T12 growth after surgery were 64.1 mm (SD 19.9) and 47.4 mm (SD 18.8), respectively, thus accounting for a mean T1 to S1 and T1 to T12 spinal growth after surgery of 10.5 mm/year (SD 3.7) and 7.8 mm/year (SD 3.3), respectively. A total of six patients (five idiopathic EOS, one cerebral palsy EOS) had broken rods during their growth spurt but were uneventfully revised with a fusion procedure. No other complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that SGR is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of EOS in nonambulatory hypotonic patients with a neuromuscular condition. Significant spinal growth can be expected after surgery and is comparable to other published techniques for EOS. While satisfactory correction of the deformity can be achieved and maintained with this technique, a high rate of rod breakage was seen in patients with an idiopathic or cerebral palsy EOS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1560-1566.

The potential of spring distraction to dynamically correct complex spinal deformities in the growing child

Purpose

Current treatment of progressive early onset scoliosis involves growth-friendly instrumentation if conservative treatment fails. These implants guide growth by passive sliding or repeated lengthenings. None of these techniques provide dynamic correction after implantation. We developed the spring distraction system (SDS), by using one or multiple compressed springs positioned around a standard sliding rod, to provide active continuous distraction of the spine to stimulate growth and further correction. The purpose of this study was to determine feasibility and proof of concept of the SDS.

Methods

We developed a versatile, dynamic spring distraction system for patients who would benefit from active continuous distraction. This prospective case series evaluates four patients with exceptional and progressive congenital spine deformities.

Results

Four patients had a mean age of 6.8 years at surgery with a mean follow-up of 36 months (range 25–45). The mean progressive thoracic lordosis, which was the reason for initiating surgical treatment in two patients, changed from 32° lordosis preoperatively to 1° kyphosis post-operatively. During follow-up, this further improved to 32° thoracic kyphosis. In the two other patients, with cervicothorcacic scoliosis, the main coronal curve improved from 79° pre-operatively to 56° post-operatively and further improved to 42°. The mean T1-S1 spine growth during follow-up for all patients was 1.3 cm/year. There was one reoperation because of skin problems and no device-failures.

Conclusion

These early results show the feasibility and the proof of concept of spring-based distraction as a dynamic growth-enhancing system with the potential of further correction of the deformity after implantation.

Spinal Deformity in Sotos Syndrome: First Results of Growth-friendly Spine Surgery

BACKGROUND

Sotos syndrome (SS), or cerebral gigantism, describes children with macrocephaly, craniofacial abnormalities, general overgrowth, ligamentous laxity, developmental delay, and neurological disabilities. Fewer than 500 cases have been reported since Sotos and colleagues described the condition in 1964 and no literature exists on the management of spinal deformity in children under 10 years old.The aims of this study were: (1) to characterize the presentation of spinal deformities in patients with SS; and (2) to provide preliminary results of growth-friendly instrumentation (GFI) in these children.

METHODS

Thirteen children (9 boys) with SS and minimum of 2-year follow-up were identified from 2 multicenter early-onset scoliosis (EOS) databases (1997-2017). Mean age at index surgery and follow-up duration were 5.0 years (range, 1.8 to 10 y) and 7.2 years (range, 2.1 to 14.9 y), respectively. Patients underwent GFI for a mean of 5.7 years (range, 2 to 10.2 y), with an average of 9 lengthenings (range, 2 to 18). Definitive spinal fusion was performed in 4 patients (31%). Major curve magnitude, T1-T12 and T1-S1 lengths, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis were evaluated preindex, postindex, latest GFI, and postfusion, when possible.

RESULTS

Five thoracolumbar (38%), 4 double major (31%), 2 main thoracic (15%), and 2 double thoracic curves (15%) were seen that spanned a mean of 6.8 levels (5 to 9). Major curves improved 36% (range, 5% to 71%), from a mean of 71 degrees (range, 48 to 90 degrees) to 46 degrees (range, 20 to 73 degrees) postindex surgery (P<0.001). Major curves remained stable at a mean of 52 degrees (range, 20 to 87 degrees) at latest GFI (P=0.36). True T1-T12 and T1-S1 growth velocities during GFI were 0.5 mm/mo (range, 0.4 to 0.8 mm/mo) and 0.8 mm/mo (range, 0.1 to 2.1 mm/mo), respectively. Twenty-six complications occurred in 9 patients (69%) averaging 2 complications per patient (range, 0 to 7).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to evaluate the outcomes of GFI in children with SS and EOS. Compared with published data for outcomes of GFI in EOS, children with SS may have less major curve correction. Growth-friendly surgery remains an effective treatment method for EOS in patients with SS.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-retrospective case-series.

Current status of the magnetically controlled growing rod in treatment of early-onset scoliosis: What we know after a decade of experience

The magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) has had approximately 10 years of clinical experience worldwide. Clinical effectiveness to control early-onset scoliosis is consistent even at final surgery. MCGRs have significantly lower relative percentage of infection or wound complications as compared to traditional growing rods. Most common complications include foundation failure and failure of distraction. Contouring of the rod especially at the proximal segment while accommodating for the straight actuator remains a difficult task and its failure may lead to proximal junctional kyphosis. Unique complications of MCGR include clunking, temporary diminishing distraction gains, and metallosis. Temporary reductions in distraction gains are observed as the MCGR lengthens but return to normal baseline distraction gains after rod exchange. Lack of standardization for rod configuration, distraction strategies and decisions of whether to keep the rods in situ, remove without fusion surgery or to perform spinal fusion at skeletal maturity will require further study.

Non-Pedicular Fixation Techniques for the Treatment of Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the use of pedicle screws has become the gold standard for achieving stable, 3-column fixation of the spine. However, pedicle screw placement may not always be ideal, such as in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, because of pedicle morphology. An understanding of the alternatives to pedicle screw fixation is therefore important in the treatment of patients with spinal deformity. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, advantages, disadvantages, and complications associated with non-pedicular fixation techniques of the thoracolumbar spine.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were performed for 10 methods of non-pedicular fixation. Articles published between January 1, 1990, and June 1, 2019, were considered. Non-English-language articles and studies involving fixation of the cervical spine were excluded from our review.

RESULTS

After reviewing >1,600 titles and abstracts pertaining to non-pedicular fixation, a total of 213 articles met our inclusion criteria. Non-pedicular fixation may be preferred in certain cases of spinal deformity and may provide stronger fixation in osteoporotic bone. The use of non-pedicular fixation techniques is often limited by the inability to place multilevel constructs on intact posterior elements. Additionally, some methods of non-pedicular fixation, such as spinous process tethering, primarily have utility for the end of constructs to minimize junctional problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Pedicle screws remain the anchor of choice in spinal deformity surgery because of their ability to engage all 3 columns of the spine and provide safe correction in all 3 planes. Nevertheless, non-pedicular fixation may be useful in cases in which pedicle screw placement is extremely difficult.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

3-Year follow-up of a single magnetically controlled growing rod with contralateral gliding system and apical control for early onset scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Two-center retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of the MCGR hybrid in terms of spinal growth, 3D correction, balance, and complications. The magnetic-controlled growing-rod (MCGR) growth instrumentation method has gained popularity for early onset scoliosis (EOS) treatment in the past years due to the non-invasiveness of the subsequent interval elongation procedures. To improve 3D correction and reduce the costs, we combined a single concave MCGR with a sliding rod on the convex side to control the apex.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 18 EOS children with an average 3-year follow-up (range 2.0-3.7) from two European spine centers treated with the single MCGR hybrid concept; 14 primary and 4 conversion cases. The primary and conversion cases were both evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, 1 year, 2 years, and last follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age was 9.9 (SD ± 2.9 years). The average frontal Cobb angle was reduced from mean 65° to 30° postoperatively, and had increased to 37° at latest follow-up. Rotation of the apical vertebra improved from mean 27° to 20° postoperatively which was partially lost to 23°. Kyphosis and lordosis both increased by an average of 5° during the time of follow-up. Spinal balance was improved. The post-implantation T1-S1 spine growth rate averaged 10 mm/year at last follow-up. There were 13 implant-related complications in 6 out of 18 patients. No screw pull-outs and nor surgical site infections were registered.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first medium-term results of a single MCGR hybrid construct. Maintenance of correction and growth are reasonable, and the complication rate is relatively low as compared to bilateral MCGR application.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.