Using PROMIS-29 to predict Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores using a national sample of cervical spine surgery patients

Clinical Effectiveness of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Tritanium C Anterior Cervical Cage vs. PEEK Cage

Introduction

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has proven to be a clinically efficient and cost-effective method for treating patients with degenerative cervical spine conditions. New intervertebral implant products are being developed to improve fusion and stability while decreasing complications. This study assesses the effectiveness of Tritanium C (Tri-C) Anterior Cervical Cage (Stryker) in the treatment of degenerative disk disease (DDD) of the cervical spine compared with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data prospectively collected from two institutions. Patients who underwent ACDFs for DDD using either the Tri-C cage or PEEK cage were identified. The patients' demographics, comorbidities, operative variables, and baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected. PROs included the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and numeric rating scale (NRS) for neck and arm pain. The primary outcomes included 3- and 12-month PROs as well as the rates of 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation, and perioperative complication. The radiographic outcomes included rates of subsidence, cage movement, and successful fusion within 12 months. Multivariate linear regression models were run to identify variables predictive of 12-month PROs.

Results

A total of 275 patients who underwent ACDF were included in this study and were divided into two groups: PEEK (n=213) and Tri-C (n=62). Both groups showed improvement in neck and arm pain and NDI postoperatively. When Tri-C and PEEK were compared, no significant differences were observed in the 3- or 12-month changes in neck or arm pain or NDI. Furthermore, there were no differences in the rates of 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation, and perioperative complication. Regression analysis revealed that Tri-C vs. PEEK was not a significant predictor of any outcome.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the use of porous titanium Tri-C cage during ACDFs is an effective method for managing cervical DDD in terms of PROs, perioperative morbidity, and radiologic parameters. No significant difference was observed in any clinical outcome between patients undergoing ACDF using the Tri-C cage and those in whom the PEEK cage was used.

Level of Evidence

III.

A 3-Year Study Investigating the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 for Long-Term Follow-Up in Adult Spinal Deformity

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) significantly impacts the quality of life due to three-dimensional spinal abnormalities. Patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29), play a crucial role in assessing postoperative outcomes. This study aims to investigate trends in PROMIS-29 scores over 36 months in patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion for ASD and provide insights into its long-term utility.

METHODS

A retrospective study including 163 ASD patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion was conducted. PROMIS-29 scores were collected at baseline and at postoperative (0-), 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30-, and 36-month follow-ups. Statistical analyses was performed to assess significant score changes from baseline and in consecutive recordings.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in all PROMIS-29 categories were observed at 36 months, with the greatest changes in pain intensity (-35.19%, P < 0.001), physical function (+29.13%, P < 0.001), and pain interference (-28.8%, P < 0.001). Between the 0 and 3 month mark, the greatest significant changes were recorded in pain intensity (-26.5%, P < 0.001), physical function (+24.3%, P < 0.001), and anxiety (-16.9%, P < 0.018). However, scores plateaued after the 3-month mark, with zero categories showing significant changes with subsequent consecutive recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS-29 scores demonstrated notable improvements in ASD patients particularly in pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function. However, scores plateaued beyond the 3-month mark, suggesting PROMIS-29's limited sensitivity to nuanced changes in long-term patient recovery. Future investigations exploring optimal combinations of patient reported outcome measures for comprehensive short- and long-term outcome assessments in ASD surgery would be beneficial.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy With Fusion in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative differences in racial and socioeconomic factors in patients undergoing laminoplasty (LP) versus laminectomy and fusion (LF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

DCM is prevalent in the United States, requiring surgical intervention to prevent neurological degeneration. While LF is utilized more frequently, LP is an emerging alternative. Previous studies have demonstrated similar neurological outcomes for both procedures. However, treatment selection is primarily at the discretion of the surgeon and may be influenced by social determinants of health that impact surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Quality Outcome Database (QOD), a national spine registry, was queried for adult patients who underwent either LP or LF for the management of DCM. Covariates associated with socioeconomic status, pain and disability, and demographic and medical history were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess patient factors associated with undergoing LP versus LF.

RESULTS

Of 1673 DCM patients, 157 (9.4%) underwent LP and 1516 (90.6%) underwent LF. A significantly greater proportion of LP patients had private insurance (P<0.001), a greater than high school level education (P<0.001), were employed (P<0.001), and underwent primary surgery (P<0.001). LP patients reported significantly lower baseline neck/arm pain and Neck Disability Index (P<0.001). In the multivariate regression model, lower baseline neck pain [odds ratio (OR)=0.915, P=0.001], identifying as non-Caucasian (OR=2.082, P<0.032), being employed (OR=1.592, P=0.023), and having a greater than high school level education (OR=1.845, P<0.001) were associated with undergoing LP rather than LF.

CONCLUSIONS

In DCM patients undergoing surgery, factors associated with patients undergoing LP versus LF included lower baseline neck pain, non-Caucasian race, higher education, and employment. While symptomatology may influence the decision to choose LP over LF, there may also be socioeconomic factors at play. The trend of more educated and employed patients undergoing LP warrants further investigation.

Preoperative patient-reported physical health-related quality of life predicts short-term postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to assess patients' perioperative health. The PROM Information System 29 (PROMIS-29) is a well-validated global health assessment instrument for patient physical health, though its utility in cranial neurosurgery is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utility of preoperative PROMIS-29 physical health (PH) summary scores in predicting postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients.

METHODS

Adult brain tumor patients undergoing resection at a single institution (January 2018-December 2021) were identified and prospectively received PROMIS-29 surveys during pre-operative visits. PH summary scores were constructed and optimum prediction thresholds for length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition (DD), and 30-day readmission were approximated by finding the Youden index of the associated receiver operating characteristic curves. Bivariate analyses were used to study the distribution of low (z-score≤-1) versus high (z-score>-1) PH scores according to baseline characteristics. Logistic regression models quantified the association between preoperative PH summary scores and post-operative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 157 brain tumor patients were identified (mean age 55.4±15.4 years; 58.0% female; mean PH score 45.5+10.5). Outcomes included prolonged LOS (24.8%), non-routine discharge disposition (37.6%), and 30-day readmission (19.1%). On bivariate analysis, patients with low PH scores were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with a high-grade tumor (69.6% vs 38.85%, p=0.010) and less likely to have elective surgery (34.8% vs 70.9%, p=0.002). Low PH score was associated with prolonged LOS (26.1% vs 22%, p<0.001), nonroutine discharge (73.9% vs 31.3%, p<0.001) and 30-day readmission (43.5% vs 14.9%, p=0.003). In multivariate analysis, low PH scores predicted greater LOS (odds ratio [OR]=6.09, p=0.003), nonroutine discharge (OR=4.25, p=0.020), and 30-day readmission (OR=3.93, p=0.020).

CONCLUSION

The PROMIS-29 PH summary score predicts short-term postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients and may be incorporated into prospective clinical workflows.

Identifying Correlation Among Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Study of PROMIS-29, ODI, and VAS in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is becoming increasingly common in aging populations. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are self-reported patient surveys administered pre- and postoperatively that provide insight into patient improvement. We aim to compare 3 of the most utilized PROMs: PROMIS-29, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), to investigate whether they provide unique and independent assessments of patient outcomes when assessed longitudinally.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a database of ASD at UT Southwestern Medical Center between 2016 and 2021. Adult patients (>18 years old) were included if they underwent long-segment (>4 levels) thoracolumbar fusion. PROMIS-29, ODI, and VAS scores were collected preoperatively and at 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30-, and 36-month follow-ups. Scores were recorded ±1 month of the time points. Pearson correlation coefficients for each PROM were then calculated in a pairwise fashion.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients were included in our analysis. ODI and VAS showed significant covariance, with VAS Neck and VAS Back having Pearson coefficients of 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. ODI and PROMIS-29 also showed significant covariance, with Physical Function and ODI showing a Pearson coefficient of 0.95. PROMIS-29 and VAS demonstrated less correlation regarding Pain and Physical Function; however, they showed a significantly high Pearson coefficient when comparing VAS Back with PROMIS-29 Sleep and Pain Intensity (r = 0.97 and r = 0.96, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 PROMs demonstrated significant correlation over 36 months, indicating that simultaneous administration of each during follow-up is redundant. The measure that provided the least unique information was ODI, as both VAS and PROMIS-29 demonstrated similar progression and assessed additional metrics. PROMIS-29 provided the same information as VAS and ODI, with extra facets of patient-reported outcomes, indicating that it may be a more comprehensive measure of longitudinal patient improvement.

Estimating individual health-related quality of life changes in low back pain patients

BACKGROUND

There is a need to evaluate different options for estimating individual change in health-related quality of life for patients with low back pain.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of data collected at baseline and 6 weeks later in a randomized trial of 749 adults with low back pain receiving usual medical care (UMC) or UMC plus chiropractic care at a small hospital at a military training site or two large military medical centers. The mean age was 31; 76% were male and 67% were White. The study participants completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®)-29 v 1.0 physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, anxiety, satisfaction with participation in social roles, physical summary, and mental health summary scores (T-scored with mean = 50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 in the U.S. general population).

RESULTS

Reliability estimates at the baseline ranged from 0.700 to 0.969. Six-week test-retest intraclass correlation estimates were substantially lower than these estimates: the median test-retest intraclass correlation for the two-way mixed-effects model was 0. 532. Restricting the test-retest reliability estimates to the subset who reported they were about the same as at baseline on a retrospective rating of change item increased the median test-retest reliability to 0.686. The amount of individual change that was statistically significant varied by how reliability was estimated, and which SD was used. The smallest change needed was found when internal consistency reliability and the SD at baseline were used. When these values were used, the amount of change needed to be statistically significant (p < .05) at the individual level ranged from 3.33 (mental health summary scale) to 12.30 (pain intensity item) T-score points.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that in research studies estimates of the magnitude of individual change needed for statistical significance be provided for multiple reliability and standard deviation estimates. Whenever possible, patients should be classified based on whether they 1) improved significantly and perceived they got better, 2) improved significantly but did not perceive they were better, 3) did not improve significantly but felt they got better, or 4) did not improve significantly or report getting better.

Comparison of Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System With Traditional Outcome Metrics in Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to address certain shortcomings of traditional, or legacy patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Because the use of PROMIS across orthopedic populations continues to increase, the purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the use and validation of PROMIS in spine surgery.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles reporting on the use and validation of PROMIS in spine surgery. The PROMIS formats and individual domains used by investigators were noted. Additionally, psychometric properties reported in validation studies were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both individual studies and systematic reviews have demonstrated the convergent validity of PROMIS domains, reporting moderate-to-strong correlations with legacy measures in a variety of spine patient populations. Across spine surgery patient populations, PROMIS instruments are consistently efficient, demonstrating decreased question burden compared with legacy PROMs. PROMIS domains overall exhibit responsiveness comparable with legacy measures, and the normalization of PROMIS scores to a general population allows for broad coverage, resulting in acceptable floor and ceiling effects. Despite the many strengths of PROMIS, there remain some populations where PROMIS is not suited to be used in isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS is widely used as an outcome measure in spine surgery and has been validated in a range of patient populations. Although PROMIS domains cannot fully replace legacy measures in spine patients, they can be used in certain settings to provide an efficient and psychometrically sound PROM.

Outcomes With a Mobile Digital Health Platform for Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Digital health solutions have been shown to enhance outcomes for individuals with chronic medical illnesses, but few have been validated for surgical patients. The digital health platform ManageMySurgery (MMS) has been validated for spine surgery as a feasible method for patients along their surgical journey through in-app education and completion of patient-reported outcomes surveys.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the rates of 90-day emergency room (ER) visits, readmissions, and complications in patients undergoing spine surgery using MMS compared to patients using traditional perioperative care alone.

METHODS

Patients undergoing spine surgery at a US-based academic hospital were invited to use MMS perioperatively between December 2017 and September 2021. All patients received standard perioperative care and were classified as MMS users if they logged into the app. Demographic information and 90-day outcomes were acquired via electronic health record review. The odds ratios of having 90-day ER visits, readmissions, mild complications, and severe complications between the MMS and non-MMS groups were estimated using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 1015 patients were invited, with 679 using MMS. MMS users and nonusers had similar demographics: the average ages were 57.9 (SD 12.5) years and 61.5 (SD 12.7) years, 54.1% (367/679) and 47.3% (159/336) were male, and 90.1% (612/679) and 88.7% (298/336) had commercial or Medicare insurance, respectively. Cervical fusions (559/1015, 55.07%) and single-approach lumbar fusions (231/1015, 22.76%) were the most common procedures for all patients. MMS users had a lower 90-day readmission rate (55/679, 8.1%) than did nonusers (30/336, 8.9%). Mild complications (MMS: 56/679, 8.3%; non-MMS: 32/336, 9.5%) and severe complications (MMS: 66/679, 9.7%; non-MMS: 43/336, 12.8%) were also lower in MMS users. MMS users had a lower 90-day ER visit rate (MMS: 62/679, 9.1%; non-MMS: 45/336, 13.4%). After adjustments were made for age and sex, the odds of having 90-day ER visits for MMS users were 32% lower than those for nonusers, but this difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.45-1.02; P=.06).

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first studies to show differences in acute outcomes for people undergoing spine surgery who use a digital health app. This study found a correlation between MMS use and fewer postsurgical ER visits in a large group of spine surgery patients. A planned randomized controlled trial will provide additional evidence of whether this digital health tool can be used as an intervention to improve patient outcomes.

Differences in postoperative quality of life in young, early elderly, and late elderly patients undergoing surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy

OBJECTIVE

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common progressive spine disorder affecting predominantly middle-aged and elderly populations. With increasing life expectancy, the incidence of CSM is expected to rise further. The outcomes of elderly patients undergoing CSM surgery and especially their quality of life (QOL) postoperatively remain undetermined. This study retrospectively reviewed patients to identify baseline differences and validated postoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in elderly patients undergoing CSM surgery.

METHODS

The multi-institutional, neurosurgery-specific NeuroPoint Quality Outcomes Database was queried to identify CSM patients treated surgically at the 14 highest-volume sites from January 2016 to December 2018. Patients were divided into three groups: young (< 65 years), early elderly (65-74 years), and late elderly (≥ 75 years). Demographic and PRO measures (Neck Disability Index [NDI] score, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] score, EQ-5D score, EQ-5D visual analog scale [VAS] score, arm pain VAS, and neck pain VAS) were compared among the groups at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 1151 patients were identified: 691 patients (60%) in the young, 331 patients (28.7%) in the early elderly, and 129 patients (11.2%) in the late elderly groups. At baseline, younger patients presented with worse NDI scores (p < 0.001) and lower EQ-5D VAS (p = 0.004) and EQ-5D (p < 0.001) scores compared with early and late elderly patients. No differences among age groups were found in the mJOA score. An improvement of all QOL scores was noted in all age groups. On unadjusted analysis at 3 months, younger patients had greater improvement in arm pain VAS, NDI, and EQ-5D VAS compared with early and late elderly patients. At 12 months, the same changes were seen, but on adjusted analysis, there were no differences in PROs between the age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' results indicate that elderly patients undergoing CSM surgery achieved QOL outcomes that were equivalent to those of younger patients at the 12-month follow-up.

Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Quality Outcomes Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) may use anterior or posterior approaches. Our objective was to compare baseline differences and validated postoperative patient-reported outcome measures between anterior and posterior approaches.

METHODS

The NeuroPoint Quality Outcomes Database was queried retrospectively to identify patients with symptomatic CSM treated at 14 high-volume sites. Demographic, comorbidity, socioeconomic, and outcome measures were compared between treatment groups at baseline and 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 1151 patients with CSM in the cervical registry, 791 (68.7%) underwent anterior surgery and 360 (31.3%) underwent posterior surgery. Significant baseline differences were observed in age, comorbidities, myelopathy severity, unemployment, and length of hospital stay. After adjusting for these differences, anterior surgery patients had significantly lower Neck Disability Index score (NDI) and a higher proportion reaching a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in NDI (P = 0.005 at 3 months; P = 0.003 at 12 months). Although modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were lower in anterior surgery patients at 3 and 12 months (P < 0.001 and P = 0.022, respectively), no differences were seen in MCID or change from baseline. Greater EuroQol-5D improvement at 3 months after anterior versus posterior surgery (P = 0.024) was not sustained at 12 months and was insignificant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest analysis to date of CSM surgery data, significant baseline differences existed for patients undergoing anterior versus posterior surgery for CSM. After adjusting for these differences, patients undergoing anterior surgery were more likely to achieve clinically significant improvement in NDI at short- and long-term follow-up.

Patient Participation With a Mobile Phone Application for Objective Activity Assessment Before and After Spinal Fusion

Background 

Evolution within spine surgery is driven by a surgeon’s desire for expertise and significant improvement in their patients’ quality of life. As surgeons move away from using subjective patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys, there must be an alternative objective metric in its place. Modern iPhone (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) technology can be used to capture daily activity in a simple, non-user biased manner. These health data can be used to analyze objective functional status in conjunction with PRO surveys to measure surgical outcomes.

Methods 

Patients who underwent an awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) between 2014 and 2018 at our institution were identified. Patients were consented and instructed to download the application “QS Access” (Quantified Self Labs, San Francisco, CA). Following data collection, we analyzed the demographic information of patients who were reached to gauge participation and feasibility of data exportation.

Results

A total of 177 patients who underwent an awake TLIF at our institution were contacted. Of those who answered, 41 (44.6%) agreed to participate and 51 (55.4%) declined to participate. When comparing those who either participated or declined, there were no significant differences in age (p=0.145), sex (p=0.589), or ethnicity (p=0.686).

Conclusion 

Our pilot study examined the patient participation in the novel usage of Apple "Health" data, queried from "QS Access" (Quantified Self Labs), to objectively measure relative patient functional status surrounding spinal fusion. We demonstrated that a smartphone-based application was mostly well received by our patient cohort and has the potential to be used as an objective operative metric moving forward.